Beullogeo's

1.CanSpeccy said about SCHOOLS:



"Lack of motivation must be a factor.



"When youth unemployment among black Americans is 50%, WTF use is a high school diploma...



"Best to start selling drugs right away and forget school altogether.



"The same sort of destructive thought processes must afflict many children in almost any Western society where work has been offshored and outsourced, to beef up corporate profits, which have rarely been higher.



"In the meantime, workforce skills are wasting away.



"What is the reward for the hard work necessary to obtain a good education? LOL



"They have plenty of good brains in India and China, so who's gonna rush to employ a math wiz. or programming geek who expects to earn a decent salary and who, in any case, is not permitted by law to work for less than than a minimum wage that a fresh graduate in India would die for."



http://canspeccy.blogspot.com/



The Economist Who Said "The Emperor Has No Clothes"

2. Anonymous said...



Japan is no better



"Students’ academic ability is in free-fall, writes Okabe.



"Simple logical thinking is beyond them.



"Their vocabulary is childish, their grasp of mathematics feeble, their curiosity nowhere in evidence.



"The latter is doubly surprising, he points out, in view of the young generation’s easy familiarity with the Internet — but the Net apparently appeals to them more as a playground than as a research venue.



http://educationinjapan.wordpress.com/



Japan's colleges facing 'meltdown' « EDUCATION IN JAPAN COMMUNITY Blog

Website for this image

In the UK, on 7 April 2011, teachers at Darwen Vale High School, near Blackburn Lancashire, are to stage a walk-out.

The teachers are protesting at the lack of support they have received from the head teacher.

"They say pupils frequently challenge teachers to fights, push and shove them in the corridors and classrooms and are constantly swearing and insulting them." (Strike-hit school governor blames pupil anarchy... on wind and rain‎)

The teachers say that when they take the matters to the head teacher she often sides with the pupils instead of staff.

Americans are worried that their education system is no longer producing enough inventors like Thomas Edison. Thomas Edison invented the light bulb. "Nearly all his childhood learning took place at home."

So, how should schools be organised?

1. Give pupils a choice of schools.

This means there must be lots of small schools of different types.

All schools should be tiny.

The big schools should be broken up.

2. Give headmasters and teachers the right to exclude pupils who are disruptive.

3. Set up special schools that give intensive care (very expensive) to the disruptive children.

4. Set up top quality schools that cater for the less academic kids.

There are parents and children who want such schools - so long as they are well run, and do not become dumping grounds for the disruptive children.

5. Lower the school leaving age and shorten the school day.

This will mean children will learn more.

That is the paradox.

6. Sack the bureaucrats.

According to an article about UK schools in Scotland on Sunday, 9 September 2007, (Alexander attacks 'bloated' education authorities) one in every four pounds of education funding never makes it to schools.

Studies show that of the average £5,160 spent on a child's education annually, £1,700 is swallowed up by local government.

It is time to close down the "bloated" education authorities. Get rid of the government bureaucrats, both local and national. Sack the education chiefs. It is these folks who have helped to ruin British schools.

Why is the world suffering from the machinations of the internationalist mafia? What has happened to us that has allowed these inhuman monsters to gain such power over our lives? It seems that not many years ago, although intrigue was afoot, the world at large was for all practical purposes immune to the drive towards the global gulag. So what happened to weaken our natural immunity? Why did we let our mortal enemies get the upper hand?

This is indeed a tricky question to answer. I would hazard to suggest that the reason our hidden masters have such power is that we perceive them to have this power. What has changed is that we now have a mass media which presents a false image of the world to us, and by owning that media, our enemies have convinced us that we are powerless to halt their progress, and that we really shouldn't waste our time trying to.

The printed word, which offered the opportunity for a great spreading of knowledge, has become a medium for the spreading of ignorance and falsehood. To an even deeper extent, audio, and visual media, have become a source of power for those who seek to control us. This is because the human brain works in sounds and pictures and absorbs more information if presented in a manner which mimics natural interaction and experience. Thus the advent of Hollywood and television has proven to be highly significant in influencing how the world is perceived and how this perception is reflected in how people behave in reality.

Our enemies control the media. They own every major outlet, either directly, or directly by being hold the purse strings through advertising. Thereby, they are the editorial power - deciding exactly which issues will be discussed, and in which manner, and which will be ignored. People who speak of revolution are deluding themselves - the media as it exists is in the hands of the globalists, and so long as they have financial power, that is where it will rest.

'Money', in the form we have come to know it, is an illusion. It is produced at the strike of a key on a computer, and from that moment on exists as a generator of debt. We cannot compete with the globalists by trying to become financially more powerful in the conventional sense, as they control the money supply and can create currency at will. What we have to do is look beyond the playing field that has been concocted for our enslavement, and work in reality, rather than in illusion, refusing to play their game and support their agenda.

How do we escape the web which has been spun for us? The media constantly tell us that we cannot. Well, we can. A key step in our struggle for freedom is to stop listening to the lies which are used to imprison us. How many people watch television from the moment they get home, to the moment they go to bed? Some may convince themselves they are 'selectively' viewing and that by filtering out what they consider the most harmful programmes, music, films etc, they are safe from the influence of the mind controllers. This is rubbish! The powers-that-be are far from stupid. They have created levels of control - some obvious, some subtle - but all designed to manipulate the viewer/listener. The obvious mind control is deliberately obvious, so as to allow the participant of the media circus to consider him or herself to have discovered the game and dodged it. 'I don't watch the soaps, I only watch history documentaries' etc - if this is you speaking, you haven't escaped the mind programming, you have actually embraced it more than those who watch all the drivel on the TV, as you belive what you watch to be fair and unbiased. the solution? Turn the machine off, put it in a cupboard, and when the withdrawla symptoms have worn off (It is an adiction - you will experience withdrawal), bin it!

Freeing your mind from the media is but one step in the march to freedom. It is, however, the most important step. Once you are 'clean' of the media poison, you will come to realise that the media are really powerless. they gain control over us because we invite their toxic propaganda into our minds. Once we no longer partake of their lies, they have no power at all. 'But what will i do if I don't have a TV?' I hear you ask. Think about that question - what will you do, other than stare at a box in the corner of your room? For a start you will NOT stare at a box in the corner of your room! You will Not be programmed to be a servant to the machine - eating your meals at certain times so you can watch the programmes you just MUST see! You will be free to leave your home and live in the real world. You will be free to talk to your loved ones - about things which really matter. You will be free to explore your desires, to explore the world and to enjoy your imagination. In short, you will be free to begin living in a manner of your choosing, not in the manner designed by those who seek to control you.

This is but the first step. Believe me, once you have made yourself aware that the media control is a lie, you will begin to see concrete ways to live outside the wider control of the ruling elite - and then we will take back our power from the minority who rule us, and take back our freedom. Their power is the power we give them. Take it back!

Third Positionism is twenty years old. The 10 points of Third Positionism which were formulated in 1989 have proven their worth. Not only do they remain as valid as they did in 1989, but they become more valid as each day passes.

It is true that the likes of Gri££in publicly espoused Third Positionism, then went on to advocate reactionary 'right-wing' politics. By accepting the left-right Masonic spectrum and seeking a place in it, these people have proven that they only paid lip service to the Spiritual Purpose encapsulated in the ideology they flirted with.

Those who now call themselves National Bolsheviks, National Anarchists, (Ziono-)Populists, Third Wayists etc have slipped into a materialist way of thinking - if they ever escaped it at all. This does not in any way dilute the importance of the Third Position.

Third Positionism is not merely an ideology, it is a way of life. All the movements which have been touched by this creed have benefited as a result. It is those which cling to materialist and establishment dogma (Monarchism, Zionism, Capitalism, Communism, Imperialism, Sectarianism, Addiction to Westminster &c)who have fallen into the traps set for them by the dogmas they adhere to.

As we race towards 2012 and the Global Superstate, Third Positionism is the only creed for those who refuse to sacrifice themselves and their families on the altar of International Materialism.

Let Gri££in and co accept the microchip and all that comes with it. Our concern is not with those who refuse to see the world for what it is; less so for those who purposely squeeze their eyes shut to block out the truth.

See the Ten Point Declaration of the Third Position HERE

Pop singer Jamelia is fronting a campaign to get British school-children to give 10 pence from their dinner money to help children in Africa and Asia. How nice is that? How could anyone possibly object to this lovely warm-hearted encouragement of over-privileged children in rich Great Britain, helping poor under-privileged children in Kenya, Cambodia and other lands? It will encourage social responsibility and international compassion. How could anyone be so mean-spirited to not want British children to do their bit for their counterparts in the developing world?

Well, at the risk of being labelled politically incorrect, I object! Jamelia is a stooge of the New World Order. I very much doubt that she is aware that she is being used, or that she has any evil intent, however she is fronting a campaign which is politically motivated and psychologically damaging to the children it targets.

School children in the West are being told that they are over-privileged. This nonsense is a communitarian ploy to instill the lie that just because they are not starving (yet), children in the West are responsible for children everywhere that are starving. The terms under and over privileged are politically correct buzzwords which like all NewSpeak words, mean whatever the political commissars see fit at any given time. The terms are designed to enforce a sense of guilt.

What is sickening is that many school-children in Great Britain live on or below the poverty line. Death through malnutrition is a fact in Britain. Poverty is gripping more people daily. The idea that Britain is a rich nation is a lie. Britain is economically bankrupt. The only rich people in the country are the bankers and financial elite who have reduced the ordinary people of the nation to the position slavery. Slavery is an accurate word. Everyone in the country must work to pay taxes to the government - taxes which the government have granted themselves to pay their Zionist banking masters. Those who do not work survive on benefits - certainly some people manage to play the system, but generally most people just eke out an existence. To use the Marxist phrase, the workers of this nation, regardless of occupation, are wage-slaves. Through taxation and over-bearing legislation, aside from the Zionist paymasters, no-one in this country is free. Telling our children they are over-privileged and must part with their dinner money is a sick and twisted lie.

If for just one moment we accept the lie that the people of Britain are rich, the idea that those who work hard and save to look after their families must pay for those who won't, is nonsense. Why should people who have money give to those who haven't? The campaign Jamelia is fronting is simply an endorsement of global scrounging. How many of us have had someone come up to them in a pub and demand a pint, using the excuse 'I haven't any money and you work!' to justify this sponging mentality? Would you buy this scrounger a beer, or tell him/her to buy his/her own? As an adult, the choice is yours. The equivalent blackmailing in the schools is different, because it is children who are being pressured by Teachers, pop-stars, charities and a whole industry of scroungers to give up their parents' money. It is officially sanctioned school-bullying and child abuse, pure and simple.

To the parents out there, I say to you, do not let your children give your money to international scroungers. The money won't benefit the poor in foreign nations anyway. Whatever money gets through will only encourage them to demand more. The money you earn is yours. You do not have to give a penny to anyone. Those who live in poverty through a failure to deal with the despots in their own countries, must rise up and deal with the parasites who rule their lands - as indeed must we. Charity only helps prop up the financial elite who oppress the people they rule over. Worse still, it encourages those who get hand-outs from Britain to come here and leach even more money from the put upon workers.

They are after your children's' dinner money! They want to take the food from the mouths of your children. They are instilling false guilt into the minds of the impressionable youth. This is child abuse. This is Politically Correct pædophilia. Defend your nation, defend your children. Say no to international charity. They will call you mean-spirited for refusing to give your money to unworthy scroungers. Let them! Take pride that you are looking after your own. Educate your children. Make them strong enough to resist the state-sanctioned bullies!

We must secure the existence of our people and a future for white children. This begins by saying no to our enemies who would starve our children and psychologically damage them. No, Jamelia, you are not getting a penny from my family! You are the one who should feel shame for endorsing such a sick and harmful cause. If you care anything about children you will condemn this child abuse!

Etymology is a fascinating subject. Languages are natural living entities which change and adapt as the culture in which they are based develops. The exception is dead languages, which through lack of usage become frozen in time. Looking at how words gradually alter their meanings is am interesting way of understanding the fluidity of the national culture they reflect.

Only last night, whilst playing chess with friend and comrade, Eddy Morrison, the question arose as to the reason why the chess-piece known as the 'Rook' is so named. Although Chess experts frown upon the use of the word 'Castle', insisting the word 'Rook' be used, 'Castle' is the word which the vast majority of ordinary Britons use. Why is this? Quite simply, in English, a Rook is a bird, whereas the chess-piece looks like one of the many castles we have in our country. It is odd that the 'Castle' is a piece which can (if able) move right across the board in a single move. Apart from maybe hippies at Glastonbury who've eaten too many magic mushrooms, I can't think of anyone who has actually seen a castle move!

Why then is the piece we call the castle able to make such manœuvres? The reason lies squarely with the etymology of the word 'Rook'. Rook, when used in chess, has absolutely nothing to do with the bird which shares the same name. It has nothing to do with rooks being birds which are often seen in castles. The word when seen in the context of its original meaning makes a great deal of sense. Chess is a game which has existed for many years. In modern times, it can be dated back to the seventh century Gupta empire in India, and to Persia, although its origins probably go back further. The Persian word for the piece we call the castle, was رخ (rokh). This is the Persian word for a chariot. The Chariots of Persia were high speed vehicles, made to resemble small buildings. In Italy, the word rokh became rocca, which means a siege tower - again a castellated vehicle. This morphed into the English word Rook. Thus it can be seen that the high speed long range chariot of old, which resembled a small castle (and not a bird), is indeed a Rook.

As I say, I find the origins, meanings and natural development of words fascinating.

Since the middle of the twentieth century, the healthy gradual change of the English language has been hijacked for political motives. It is true that this has occured before, notably in the time of Shakespeare, when a group based around Francis Bacon created a wealth of new words, which simultaneously enriched the English language and united the regional variations. The new manipulation of English is, however, not beneficial to national cohesion, and certainly does not enrich the language. The modern engineering of our language is destructive, detrimental to its users and dangerous to society. George Orwell called it NewSpeak. We have come to know it as Political Correctness.

The destruction of the English language is so fast paced that anyone born after the Second World War who has grown up immersed in the impostor which calls itself 'English' will have difficulty in understanding the language spoken by the previous generation. For example, who would dare say he or she had enjoyed a gay day out, or that during the night out, he or she had felt a little queer?

Political Correctness is also making English grammatically nonsensical. It is practically forbidden to describe an individual as male or female. A basic sentence such as 'he asked her to dance' has become 'they asked them to dance'. This makes no sense! Describing someone by physical characteristics is now classed as discrimination and can result in imprisonment. Indeed the word 'discriminate' has been corrupted into meaning to treat in a detrimental manner. Personally I discriminate everyday. If I was offered a raw chicken or a cooked chicken to eat, failing to discriminate could result in hospital treatment!

The defenders of Political Correctness would have us believe that the manipulation of the language and the legal punishment of transgressors, is for the benefit of all - is to help the underprivileged(!) and protect disadvantaged minorities(!) They have a dishonest lexicon to 'spin' the destruction of our culture through the control of our language, into something positive. Don't be fooled. Political Correctness is NewSpeak. The self-appointed Language and Thought Police, through front groups such as Common Purpose, are destroying our beautiful and poetic language. Humans think using words and symbols. By reducing the number of words and symbols we have, they reduce the potential for thought, and in turn curtail our freedom. They could not care less for minorities or any particular group. They use political correctness to pit Male against Female, Rich against Poor, Northerner against Southerner etc. They use foreigners and deviants to confuse the issue by implying these outsiders belong in the national culture. In effect, they turn each of us into a Political Policeman to do their dirty work for them.

What is the solution to this despicable attack on all we hold dear? For once, the solution is simple: educate yourself! Study your language, refuse to use pc terms, refuse to get drawn into the Thought-crime apparatus. The PC/CP (or is that CCCP?) commissars are few. We are many. Without our co-operation, they cannot destroy our language. With a vibrant flourishing language at our disposal, we can enjoy absolute freedom of thought and make their attempts at mind control impossible. A technique they use is to instill a belief that those who use a variety of words are 'snobs', 'poofs' etc. This discourages many people from increasing their vocabularies and enjoying the enhanced freedom of expression this brings. Don't fall into their traps! Don't become an unwitting agent of the enemy.

Our language is the key to our freedom. Defend it. Use it in its organic sense. Refuse to surrender a single word to the linguistic oppressors. Take pride in the roots of your language - for therein you will find the foundations of your self. This is a battle we can win. This is a battle we must win.

Sex education lessons in England are to be compulsory for all school-children, immediately they start school (currently at 5 years of age). The twisted logic the Government are employing is that if children receive sex education they will be less likely to be promiscuous. This is akin to telling a child that there are sweeties in the kitchen and then expecting the child not to want to eat them! It is human nature to want to try new things. this is especially the case with children. To imply that telling children about sex will somehow stop them wanting to try it, is ludicrous. As if we needed any more proof that the Catholic Church has been destroyed from within by years of infiltration, the Catholic Education Service support this!

The Government has already ordered teachers to present homosexuality in a positive light, and to encourage people to 'experiment'. It is now illegal for school teachers to tell children that sodomy is unhealthy and immoral. As part of the Religious Hatred Bill (2008) it is illegal to criticise homosexuality. This tendency has spread into the Police Force who now are under instruction from Government to not arrest homosexuals who engage in cottaging (having anonymous sex in public toilets, parks and other places frequented by the general public).

It is becoming increasingly obvious that the Government are not merely trying to create a 'tolerant' society with equality for everyone regardless of sexual orientation (to use the politically correct spiel). The thrust of Government policy is aimed at implementing the Communitarian agenda which requires the destruction of the normal family and its replacement with sex obsessed deviants. This should come as no surprise considering the number of perverts who walk the halls of Westminster. It is however no laughing matter.

The politicians and their front groups such as Common Purpose are using the law to destroy the next generation. The Globalist agenda requires a destruction of morality and decency, in order to turn humans into machines for the production and consumption of material goods.

Anyone who has children and is able to, needs to home school them. In many countries this is now illegal. Why? Because they do not want an educated population, but an indoctrinated one. TheProtocols of Zion called for the destruction of Christian youth - this certainly is part of that agenda. The people who rule the UK, (including the monarchy) and their counterparts across the globe are sick monsters out to rape the minds of the innocent. And they dare call us the extremists!

Proof of the fulfillment of the Protocols of Zion can be seen in the fact that, with very few exceptions, the Zionist lie that they are a forgery is parroted by everyone. The education system has been so debased that the sheeple no longer have the capacity to think, and are becoming the useful drones necessary for the architects of the New World Order to complete their plan to enslave us all. Read more here.

Possibly with the exception of the nomads of the remotest areas of Mongolia, or the junkies of Todmorden, everyone on the planet will be aware that there is a global economic downturn underway. Whether it is the Zionists and their bankers who have engineered this economic crisis, or the downtrodden workers who are being bled white by the aforementioned criminals, virtually everyone is being effected.

Nationalists have long argued that the only way to have a healthy economy is to end unrestricted immigration and repatriate the criminal elements and spongers who have arrived in Europe and kindred lands. Then, and only then, can we break away from the Finance-Capitalist / State-Socialist economy and introduce a Distributist system based on mutual co-operation, not exploitation. Not everyone agrees with this.

The Daily Mail, a typical bleeding heart liberal 'news'paper is decrying the British Government's decision to vet immigrants to weed out the unskilled who would not benefit the economy. In typical liberal style, these arrogant champagne-Marxists have attacked the Government list as being elitist. They use the example of a shortage of Ballerinas to pour scorn on the need for immigrants to have skills. To liberals, culture is a bad thing. They hate the idea of a healthy nation with pride in its culture - the only reason Ballet is seen as elitist is because the sick rulers of this nation encourage the false class system as a means of dividing the people from one another.

The Daily Mail is not alone in its whinging about the unfairness of stopping every featherless biped nesting in soil to which it does not belong. The Socialist Party argues that immigration should be allowed with no limits at all. The loonies of the SP are kindred spirits with the do-gooders of the Mail. They belong to the same internationalist mindset. Of course they have the luxury of not having to survive on the minimum wage, or having to live in areas enriched by their beloved international friends.

The whole quota issue is a red herring. So long as the EU exists, all member states will be subject to potential unlimited immigration from other member states. As one part of the Union becomes prosperous, people from areas in decline will be able to move to it en masse. The result will be to turn Europeans into rootless cosmopolitans, and to turn Europe into a cultural wasteland. Limiting non-Europeans is a side issue.

So what is the solution to mass unemployment and the skills shortage problem? Simply put, a realistic immigration policy, genuine national sovereignty, and education.

In order to have an immigration policy, each nation must become sovereign. That means the termination of the EU and other international super-states. The free nations must then repatriate all non-kindred immigrants. This will lead in some nations to a population shortage. Countries such as England which are heavily populated with non-Europeans will find themselves in a position where there is more work than people to do it. The solution - a policy of tax breaks for larger families, and sterilisation of those unfit to breed. This would reverse the communist programme of dysgenics which has done so much harm to Europeans. Then we must have an education system which elevates the people so no job is unfilled.

I speak of Europeans. Of course other peoples have suffered from internationalism. It is not only Europeans who are afflicted by the constant stream of unassimiable immigrants. The disgusting trade in children in Thailand is funded largely by European perverts. An ethnically based population policy would benefit everyone, of all nations and races.

Of course that would make the liberal bleeding heart hæmorrhage, which would be a good thing in itself!