Beullogeo's

In 1690, Catholics in service to James Stuart fought Protestants near to the River Boyne in Ireland. The Battle of the Boyne, as it became known, was a turning point for Scotland, England and Ireland. London became a centre for the Talmudic banking cabal who financed William Stadholder. It has remained a key point of International Finance ever since.

For the people of Ireland, the victory of Stadholder meant the subjugation of the Irish to the rule of financial rapists in London. In the North, where a large number of Anglicans had been settled, the Irish Catholics were reduced to second class citizens. This overturned their dominance over the Protestants under James Stuart. The Catholic-Protestant strife in the province of Ulster had been ongoing before the time of 'King Billy' with dominance shifting from one community to the other. Stadholder's victory insured the Protestant place as the ruling section of Ulster right up until the partition of Ireland in 1921 and the bungled creation of the Irish Free State in 1922.

The historical difficulties between the Protestant and Catholic communities in the North of Ireland have been greatly exaggerated. It was the from legislation for the creation of the Irish Free State that the modern inter-community conflict stems. Rather than granting independence to the 23 counties of Munster, Connaught and Leinster, and keeping the 9 counties of Ulster within the UK, the London government divided Ireland into the North (consisting of 6 of the 9 counties of Ulster) and the South (consisting of the other 26 counties). The entire Island of Ireland was then given independence as the Irish Free State, with an option for 'Northern Ireland' (as defined by the Boundary Commission) to return to the UK should it so desire. This is of course what happened.

In the 1920 Irish local elections, pro-independence candidates had won in the three provinces outside Ulster and in the Ulster counties of Fermanagh and Tyrone as well as the city of Derry and much of Armagh and County Londonderry. By rights, the territory of Northern Ireland should not have included these areas as they had democratically chosen to be apart from the UK. However, the London regime insisted that these outright Nationalist areas be included in Northern Ireland alongside the Unionist areas. The justification for this was that a fully Unionist Northern Ireland would not be economically viable.

From the creation of the Irish Free State, the emphasis of the London regime was that the entire Island should be one nation run by Freemasonic stooges of the Crown in Dublin. The Dublin government has never been representative of the Irish people. It was created to be a tool of the Crown, giving a false impression of independence. It remains so to date.

By refusing to grant the democratic wishes of the Orange and Green communities to live apart, the London regime created conditions for conflict. When conflict did not arise, the Masonic brethren in the Orange Order manipulated tensions to force idealistic but naive Protestant men into armed units to attack Catholics. The brother Masons manipulated the Catholic community to from similar units to attack Protestants. Each side was controlled by Freemasons who stood to gain economically from inter-community violence; each side was trained by British Military Intelligence to the point of the officers in the paramilitaries being serving British operatives. Higher level Freemasons are not Christians - the dupes at the lower levels may be, but those at the top are not. The religion of Freemasonry is anti-Christian and fits very well with Talmudism. Catholics and Protestants were pitted against one another by leaders professing Christianity for purely manipulative motives.

The London regime showed its lack of respect for the people of Northern Ireland in 1940 when the territory of Northern Ireland was offered to the Irish Republic as a bribe for the neutral state to enter the war on the UK's side. The Taoiseach, Éamon de Valera, acted as a statesman and turned down this poisoned chalice. The Unionist community of Northern Ireland who volunteered to fight for the UK were not consulted and this offer remained secret until de Valera published his memoirs thirty years later. Catholics and Protestants who wished to remain in the UK were betrayed by London - yet again.

Today, sections of the Protestant community are marching across parts of Northern Ireland and in sectarian areas of Scotland and England. They are marching in the colours of the Orange Lodge, complete with the Sash which is a sign of loyalty to William Stadholder. They are marching to show their loyalty to the ruling family in London - a family which has betrayed them repeatedly. There will be demonstrations by the radicalised Nationalist community to oppose this show of fidelity to the UK. Had partition been enacted along democratic lines, the peoples of the South and West of Northern Ireland would be living in the Irish Republic and thus would have no issues with the cultural festivities of their Northern neighbours.

The London regime forced the inclusion of Irish Nationalist communities in Northern Ireland in order to force the eventual incorporation of the region into the Irish Republic. The higher birth rates in the Catholic community make this a demographic certainty. The absurd claim that the inclusion of anti-Unionist areas in a part of the UK was for economic reasons is pure chutzpah. The Sinn Fein claim that they are representative of Catholics is equally absurd. Sinn Fein are Marxist. They support homosexuality, abortion, divorce, immigration, multi-culturalism and religious diversity. They are as un-Catholic as it is possible to be.

The people of Northern Ireland have been used by the London regime to justify the militarisation of the Police. Thousands have been murdered to acclimatise the British and Irish to intrusive policing and the erosion of liberty. Bombs built by MI5 have been planted by patsies working unwittingly under MI5 direction. The stooges who get arrested may think they are serving a noble (to them) cause, but for all their UVF/IRA rhetoric, they are in reality serving the interests of the arms industry and Police State. The UVF are serving the Crown but not in the way they think!

Those marching today have every right to celebrate their culture. The link to anti-Catholicism needs to be broken; many Catholics in Northern Ireland are Unionists. Ultimately, we are all European: Irish; Scottish; English; Protestant; Catholic. Fighting one another for the benefit of the Establishment is sheer lunacy. Sinn Feiners who proclaim they are fighting for Catholics but push the internationalist agenda of multi-culturalism have no place in the Catholic world; Orangemen who proclaim to be fighting for Protestants but push for racial diversity and international finance are the enemies of the community they feign to defend.

I wish the 12th July marches a good day. Hopefully the sun will shine at some point! May they celebrate their culture and history in the spirit of national honour. May they also reject the Freemasons who manipulate them into hatred of their neighbours. For non-Unionists and my Catholic brothers and sisters, I hope you will enjoy a peaceful day and not be dragged into fighting our Celtic kinfolk. We are all Europeans; we are all Christians. It is time to say no to this insane conflict. No More Brothers Wars.

On the 4th July 1776, the British people in the North American colonies of modern day New England, issued a proclamation of independence from the government in London. The decision to separate from Britain was not taken lightly. The colonists had been placed in an untenable situation by the financiers in London. Faced with unjustifiable taxation, the British colonists felt they had no other option than to make a break from the government of the Motherland. This did not mean antipathy to their kin, only to the despots in Parliament.

The tyrannical regime in London had reacted with hostility to the repeated colonial requests for economic decency. Fighting was already underway by the time that the Declaration of Independence was issued. The central government in London sent in military forces to crush the new nation and force the 13 colonies back under the heel of Monarchical oppression. In the American Revolutionary War of 1775-1783, many British people (Crown Loyalists and Republicans) perished. At the end of the War, after much bloodshed, the United States of America emerged as an independent nation.

The USA was founded by Freemasons. Although it was declared independent, it remained tied to London through the institution of Freemasonry. In spite of this, attempts were made to smash the USA and officially reabsorb it into the British system. The most notorious of these was the Second American Revolutionary War of 1861-1865. This war was a result of unjust taxation being passed by the dominant Northern States to the detriment of the South, forcing the latter to form their own Confederate States of America to survive economically. The attempt to economically cripple both the USA and the new CSA failed due to Abraham Lincoln issuing debt-free 'Greenback' currency. To the chagrin of the Masons around him, Lincoln put his nation above the wishes of London banksters who had manipulated US policy in order to force conflict amongst the people. For his loyalty and humanity, he was murdered.

Whilst military efforts to enslave the USA had failed (possibly deliberately), economic conquest succeeded. The banking cabal in London attempted to impose a Central Bank on the USA as early as 1781 with the Bank of North America. This project failed in 1785 due to suspicion of foreign involvement. The First and Second Banks of the United States (1791-1811 and 1816-1836 respectively) created mass inflation and corruption, such that Andrew Jackson led a successful campaign for the Presidency on a promise to not renew the SBUS charter. It would not be until 1913 that the London banking cabal were to force another of their usurious institutions on the USA.

After engineering the economic crisis of 1907, the same criminals proposed a new central bank as the solution. The new bank was to be the Federal Reserve, which became a reality with the passing of the Federal Reserve Act of 1913. The Federal Reserve was responsible for the economic crisis in the 1930s which became known as the Wall Street Crash. The true end of Independence for the USA came with the 1951 Accord which granted the Federal reserve full control over US currency. Even moreso than Woodrow Wilson, President Harry Truman betrayed his nation by granting outrageous powers to the banking cabal. Known as 'Give 'em Hell Harry', he certainly lived up to this adage. Not only was Truman responsible for cutting the final checks on Federal Reserve power, he also was instrumental in the creation of Nihilistic Accursed Talmudic Ochlocracy (NATO).

Today, as millions of Americans celebrate their Day of Independence, it is a sobering fact that they are celebrating a lie. For sixty years, the USA has been an instrument of the international financial cabal. Those who died in the Revolutionary Wars to keep their nation free of usury and serfdom, died in vain. The same evil which controls the City of London, against which they fought, now has absolute control.

Why has the USA been transformed from a nation which had one of the highest standards of living in the world, into a nation wracked with poverty? Why is she no longer loved by the world, but loathed by it? Why has she left the path of respectful isolationism to become the military wing of financial imperialism? Why has the Republic become yet another Crown territory, albeit not in name?

America has faltered because it has succumbed to the banking cabal. Thankfully, it is not the first time this tragedy has befallen the USA, which means that it can be overcome as it has been before. The financial tyranny engulfing the USA is different to previous occurrences, in that it is a global phenomenon. It is for this reason that freedom for the USA is important to people the world over. If the nation most visible for wallowing in worship of money can free itself, then every nation can.

America has a choice - she can rise up and throw of the shackles of international finance or she can sink ever deeper into the living hell of total materialism. What is it to be? The Land of the Free; or the Home of the Slave?

The tide is turning in the UK. Our military are renowned the world over for being the fiercest fighters with the highest discipline. They are also very accurately described as Lions led by Donkeys. With very few exceptions, the Lions have been led to the slaughter by the Donkeys in charge and have obeyed orders unquestioningly. The most infamous example of this behaviour is the destruction of British youth in the Great War. The brave men who did refuse to 'go over the top' to meet certain death for no reason, were shot as cowards by order of the men in Whitehall who ensured that they were personally never in the firing line.

After requesting for 500 volunteers to take redundancy from the British Army, over 1,000 have applied. These include 52 Colonels, 6 Brigadiers and 48 Majors - and many others with a long service history. A poll on the Army Rumour Service (ARRSE) recorded a 2/3 majority who would take voluntary redundancy if they could.

Why are the soldiers leaving? Because they joined up to defend their nation, not to murder foreigners in their own lands for the benefit of corrupt politicians and internationalist corporations. Being given inadequate support in terms of equipment that can be relied upon has certainly not helped. Also, the majority of the military are sick to the back teeth of the politicisation of the army. The situation in the British military is not dissimilar to the inclusion of kommissars in the ranks of the Red Army at the worst period of the Soviet Union. Another major factor remains the natural British sense of fair play which still permeates our culture - in spite of massive propaganda through the media and education systems to reduce our people to materialistic drones. It seems that Political Correctness cannot over-ride humanity. When decent men and women are ordered to murder civilians who are no threat to the Motherland, as we are seeing now, the healthy response is to firmly and with dignity, say No.

Bravo to the good men and women of the military who have refused to blindly obey the parasitic vermin who run the UK, and are leaving the military en masse rather than serve our oppressors. The highest patriotic duty is to oppose those who threaten the nation - especially the enemies within.

News link here

In 1982 the Thatcher regime sent men to die in the Falklands in order to ensure that her hated government was re-elected. Now, nearly 20 years after the Falklands Conflict, those who lost relatives are being further insulted by the Tory depletion of the military, which means that should Argentina again wish to take charge of the Falklands Islands, they will have no problem so doing - and considering what a boost that would be for the politicians in Buenos Aires, it would be surprising if that doesn't happen.

The Falklands Conflict of 1982 was sheer political opportunism. The regime in London had been in power for a mere three years, during which they had reneged on every promise made in the 1979 General Election. A promise to halt immigration, for example, turned into an increase in the number of people entering the country. This exacerbated the unemployment situation and led to riots across many English cities. By 1982, public discontent with the regime was such that it seemed inevitable that the government would fall. Faced with the prospect of bowing to the will of the electorate, the London criminals chose another option - they chose war.

The prospect of war came with the invasion of the Falkland Islands by the Argentine Navy. The Islands had been in dispute for sometime and the British government, eager for an opportunity to distract the people from the social ills wracking the UK, had manipulated the Argentine government into invading the Islands in order to create such a diversion. The war was not about defending the Islanders from foreign aggression. Prior to the Thatcher regime's slander of Argentina, the Islands had a very close relationship with Buenos Aires. Stories that the Islanders were in any way endangered by Argentina were pure fantasy.

Once hostilities broke out, the media went into overdrive spreading lies about our European kin in Argentina; dehumanising them with absurd propaganda. During the War, the Argentine ship, the General Belgrano, was sank by the Royal Navy whilst attempting to return to Argentina with injured servicemen. The Establishment media greeted this war crime with applause; notably with the infamous Sun scandal sheet 'Gotcha' headline. The reaction of the British people to the atrocities being committed in their name was to wave flags and celebrate. To date no one has been held to account for this crime. Just as with Bomber Harris, the Butcher of Dresden, the British war criminal responsible for the sinking of the Belgrano were treated as heroes, not murderers.

Brian Haw is an exceptional individual. For the past ten years he has been fighting the vipers in Westminster, encamped in Parliament square every day until forced to leave due to ill health. His protest has been ignored by the media, proving (if anyone doubted it) that there is no such thing as democracy or a free press in the UK.

Now seriously ill due to ten years of inhaling pollution from vehicles, or maybe just from ten years of being in such close proximity to THEM (The Hierarchy Enslaving Mankind), Brian Haw has had to withdraw from Parliament Square. He will not be allowed to return (even if he is well enough) as it is now illegal to do so! This is the reality of the mother of all parliaments. If she was a human being, her children would have been taken into care due to the poisonous nature of this bad parent.

Brian Haw has been an inspiration. His political views are his own, but his resistance to the tyrants is truly magnificent. One individual CAN make a difference. Resistance is far from futile.


************************************************************************************
UPDATE: Brian Haw passed away from cancer yesterday (18th June 2011). RIP Brian.

It is seldom indeed that the shenanigans of the faux democratic system are of any interest other than as an annoyance. Living in a part of England over-run by non-Europeans, the local council elections proved to be of such dubious merit - not a single candidate in my council ward was English, or even from the broader European family. The Establishment party (oops parties!) at least printed their propaganda in English on the reverse side of their pointless internationalist pamphlets, although I suspect this courtesy to the host population will be dispensed with in due course as the last of the Europeans leave the cess pit which was once a strong and vibrant beacon of European culture. My family have lived in this area for many generations - I owe it to generations to come to move out as soon as I can sell up and leave. It is sad but vital for my kin.

What grabbed my attention was not the depressing sewer politics in England, but the outstanding victory for the National Party in Scotland. The SNP won a clear majority in the national election, despite the system being rigged to prevent a single party gaining overall control. Leader of the SNP, Alex Salmond, has promised the people that now he has a mandate to hold a referendum on independence for the Celtic nation, he will deliver the referendum, and (assuming the Scots are allowed to vote as they choose, free from the machinations of Westminster) the great nation of Alba may at last be reborn. Clearly the idea of the Scots being treated with respect by the despots in London is the stuff of fantasy, but to reach this stage is remarkable in itself.

So, what does the victory of the SNP mean for Scotland and the UK? Sadly, it does not mean the fulfilment of the long-cherished dream of freedom from the tyrants in Buckingham Palace. Alex Salmond portrays himself as a true Scot, fighting for the rights of the Scottish people, but he is just as kosher as his counterparts south of the border. He may munch the odd Scotch Pie on the election trail, but I suspect he is more partial to Gefilte Fish at home. Should the people of Scotland understandably vote to break from London in any forthcoming plebiscite, the SNP are in place to ensure that freedom is achieved in name only, with power remaining with the British Establishment as before.

Contrary to popular myth, Scotland was not taken over by England, but rather the Act of Union of 1707 consolidated the power of Freemasonry across the British mainland. The visible focus of power became London, but the Monarchy and their Freemasonic henchmen did not give away any real power. The SNP may speak of independence, but they are mere pantomime actors continuing to perform in the public spotlight, keeping the light of truth away from the reality of the Monarchical Freemasonic Zionist cabal which genuinely controls everything in British political, economic and social life. The SNP are a part of the Establishment and in no way a threat to its continuing control.

In a genuine democracy (such as the one which the British Establishment is now destroying in Libya), the promise of a referendum on independence would be a promise which one could rely upon. However, in the heartland of the Masonic money power, a promise means nothing. Just as with the times that a referendum on membership of the EU (or acceptance of treaties) has been promised in the Westminster elections, and then refused on grounds so tenuous they would make a barrister blush, the promised referendum on Scottish Independence is not as straight forward as it should be. The SNP propose to keep Scotland in the EU, retain the Windsor mafia family as Heads of State, and continue to use the British Pound as currency with full monetary control remaining with the Bank of England!

Let me recap the bizarre definition of Independence as envisioned by the 'Scottish' National Party:

Is it just me, or does that sound like the very antithesis of freedom and independence?

The victory of the SNP is positive insofar as it shows that the Scottish people desire freedom from the decadence of London. If Scotland does break free from the Union then all the peoples of the British Isles will gain. The battle now is to ensure that the reality of the SNP's sham independence drive is exposed and that a campaign for real independence is fought - in every nation of the UK. Real independence requires complete financial independence and therefore demands the abolition of the Bank of England with the entire usurious debt-based monetary system being buried alongside it. Independence must mean complete National Freedom - that means withdrawal from all globalist institutions (EU, NATO, UN, IMF, et al). Independence without Social Justice is meaningless. The Monarchy must be abolished, preferably in a permanent manner which prevents the possibility of any of the bloodline from ever being able to return to a position of power at any level, anywhere.

A free Scotland means a free England, Cymru, Mannin, Kernow et al. It also means the end of the occupation of Ireland after centuries of tyrannical terrorist rule by the Monarchy and their puppets in the Orange Order and the Green Lodge. The SNP version of independence is a farce, but the desire of the people is genuine enough. It is time for all Britons to build on the victory in Scotland and to demand real freedom for all the British nations from the evil cabal in the City of London. We are in an uphill fight against the Windsor criminal family, but it is a fight we must win.

Are you looking for a way out of the System? Do you want justice for the false-flag terror attacks in the U.S., U.K. and elsewhere? Do you want to end the endless wars in the Middle East that are bankrupting both the U.S. and the U.K.?

The only solution is a change of government. Many people recoil in horror at the thought of a revolution, and for good reason: human history has shown that revolutions cause ruin and death, while often resulting in few improvements for the common man. It doesn't have to be that way.

A unique opportunity has presented itself to create a new government in a peaceful and logical manner. It doesn't require us to take up arms nor does it require us to go to war. All that is required is our solidarity and support for someone who is doing the hard work for us all.

How can one tell when a public figure is good for his or her country? Very simply, the Establishment media will castigate that person, concoct all manner of vile lies against him or her, and then use the robots of the military to smash said individual. Such as with the heinous crimes perpetrated against Saddam Hussein and the people of Iraq, the latest victim of globalist tyranny is the honourable Libyan regime headed (so we are told) by Colonel Muammar al-Qaddafi.

The liars in Westminster who - lest we forget - justified the carnage in Iraq with the faery tale of 'Weapons of Mass Destruction' are now ceaselessly jabbering about how the government in Libya is anti-democratic and how 'we' must save them - by raping their economy and butchering their population.

What is the truth about the leader of Libya? Well, for a start, he is the titular head of the nation, but unlike the tyrant of Buckingham Palace, he has no real power. So much for the 'mad dictator' we hear about. Far from being the enemy of the people, Qaddafi is revered as the beloved 'Great Brother, Leader of the Revolution'. More than any African figure, he has consistently promoted peace and prosperity for the continent, arguing that its destiny lies in wrenching itself free from foreign imperialism. Qadaffi is a fervent supporter of Arab unity, and stands unwaveringly against Zionism. However, he is not a supporter of religious extremism, as the biased globalist media would have it. (Odd how Zionism is never portrayed as extreme...)

We are told that Qadaffi is a monster and a despot, and that the people of Libya live in fear. This is pure propaganda nonsense. Far from being a dictator, Qadaffi is an advocate of genuine popular rule. In his 'Green Book' he accurately describes western-style democracy as a trick by which rule is given over to "a dictatorship in the seat of power garbed in the guise of democracy...democracy can only exist with the presence of the people, and not in the presence of representatives of the people. Parliaments have become a legal barrier between people and their right to exercise authority. They exclude the masses in order to prevent them from practicing politics, and monopolise the control of politics in their name...the people are prey fought over by the predators: instruments of government compete in their power struggle for the votes of the people they in turn neglect and exploit...In order to rule, the opposition party must defeat the existing instrument of government. To do so, the opposition must undermine the government’s achievements and cast doubt on its plans, even if these plans were beneficial to society, to prove the incompetence of the current governing instrument. Consequently, the interests and programmes of society become victims of the power struggle raging among the political parties". How true.

Qadaffi does not merely highlight the fallacy of Western Democracy, he offers an alternative. His Third Universal Theory outlines the essential qualities of Direct Democracy. He argues for the establishment of Popular Congresses comprised of all the people in each locality. These Congresses feed into the National Government and provide the people with the power to govern themselves. The smoke and mirrors of Western Democracy are done away with and replaced by Direct Rule by the people. This necessitates a focus upon Social Justice for all and the centrality of Family as the most important part of the nation. This rejection of materialism is perhaps what has prompted the imperialist aggression which Libya is now enduring. The Libyan system puts people above profits, sees the socialisation of the national infrastructure as vital to guarantee the survival of the nation and rejects destructive internationalist practices such as unlimited immigration and multi-culturalism. The Third Universal Theory is the solution to political Correctness. It is the worst nightmare of the Zionist-Masonic anti-human worldview.

So, how has Libya fared under the guidance of Qaddafi? Until the sadistic barbarians of NATO (led by the British Establishment and its military puppet, the USA) started bombing Libya, the nation had the highest standard of living in all of Africa, the strongest sense of culture, the lowest infant mortality rate and highest life expectancy in Africa, ranked 61st in the Global league for percentage of population incarcerated and, unlike 'civilised' England, had no taxation on food whatsoever. Such was the strength of the economy, that massive numbers of migrant workers were required for the national social development programmes and general production. Because foreign ownership of oil production is forbidden, Libya is rich - with oil revenue being equally distributed amongst the general population for the good of all. Contrast this with Scotland where the oil companies make a fortune and many Scots live below the poverty line and eek out an existence rather than a fruitful life. Scenes on CNN and the BBC of people fleeing across the border into Tunisia have been manipulated to produce the idea that Libyans are escaping the Qadaffi regime. In truth the people leaving are guest workers fleeing the NATO murderers.

Qadaffi wrote prophetically in the Green Book about the importance of national homogeneity. The tribal eruption in the east of Libya is precisely what he warned against. However, the tribes of the east did not spontaneously rise up against the government in Tripoli, nor is their campaign one of cessation as would be expected if the 'rebels' were genuinely seeking independence. What is the truth of these 'rebels'? It should come as no surprise that the rebels are mostly foreign in origin and entirely controlled by foreign interests, notably the unholy trinity of UK-USA-Israel. Why would foreign interests wish to destabilise the most cultured, civilised, prosperous and peaceful country in Africa? There are several reasons:

So, what of the people of Libya? Far from rising up against Qadaffi (who of course is really a ceremonial head of state, as power resides with the people), they are courageously fighting back against the internationalist invaders. Civilians are being armed so they can defend themselves, their familes, their nation and their way of life. Was Qadaffi truly a dictator he would be taking their weapons away from them, not arming them. Is it not interesting that the regimes in Washington and London are ceaselessly disarming the populations they rule over, but 'tyrant' Qadaffi is arming his countrymen?

The controlled opposition and the internationalist invaders are fighting a war of aggression against the common people of Libya in order to subjugate them to the will of the internationalist machine. The inhumanity of the aggressors can be seen in the use of depleted uranium tipped missiles, which cause all the ailments associated with radiation poisoning. Libya will become a nuclear wasteland, just as has Iraq and other victims of the materialist menace.

What is to be done about this? Quite simply, the truth must be told. Copies of the Green Book should be distributed to undermine the lies of the Establishment (print a copy for yourself HERE). We must stand in solidarity with our brothers and sisters in Libya against the war machine. If you are in the military, you must refuse to fight for the enemies of humanity - should this necessitate mutiny against your superiors to the point of armed revolt, so be it. Enough is enough. What the butchers of NATO are doing to Libya today they will do soon enough to all who resist absolute slavery. Take a stand. Fight for national freedom and social justice. Do not pay taxation to the tyrants in Westminster, Bruxelles, Washington etc. Say no to their laws and refuse to recognise their authority.

Bring the military home. No more wars for economic conquest, imperialism or politics. The military should be for defence only. If we tolerate this we deserve the serfdom and suffering which awaits us.

The United Kingdom is the home to the international financial menace. From these shores, the parasitic banking elite have pushed their agenda of Global Government since before the UK even was an officially recognised State. They operate from the British Isles, but are not of these Isles.

The financial elite in the City of London have ruled over the British in the manner slave masters rule over their human property. They have maintained an official distance from the official political government, and by so doing, the real Establishment has hidden in the shadows. Not any longer does this appear to be the case.

The 7th September 2010 is a date which would be unremarkable but for the appointment of the head of the HSBC to the post of Minister for Trade in the UK Government. Stephen Green is not an elected politician and therefore has no justification for being in the Government. He is not even an indigenous Briton, as can be noted by his name Green (an English enough sounding name, but one favoured by a certain type of alien).

Stephen Green's qualification for taking the significant post as Minister of State for Trade, is that he is the Chairman of the British section of the international bank, the HSBC - one of the most powerful of the ruling banks of the entire world, based in the powerhouse of international Capitalism...Communist China.

Green will remain head of the HSBC in Britain until the end of the year, thus maintaining his position as high ranking bankster whilst preparing to dictate economic policy. Is this a conflict of interest? Or, is it just an arrogant display of power by the real Establishment? He is to be made a member of the House of Lords to cement his position in Government. How 'democratic'!

Green will be joining in Government his co-religionist Leon Britannisky who has been appointed as Trade Advisor, and yes he too has no democratic mandate.

Is the mask finally slipping? More to the point, will this blatant usurping of power by hostile elements more suited to the Knesset than Westminster even be noticed?

Internationalism is a clear and present danger which, if unstopped, will see the entire globe subjugated under the heel of a cabal which has fed its tentacles into every hierarchy on the Earth. But, what exactly is this 'Internationalism' which brings so much harm? More importantly, how can it be stopped?

Internationalism is the complete erosion of Nationalism. It is presented by its adherents as a solution to the ills of the world. A world without borders, so they reason, would be a world without war, and, (the bleeding hearts contend) would be such a wonderful accomplishment that only truly evil people could object to it. People who take such a position are either wholly ignorant of reality, and experience life with a childlike naivety, or they are motivated by an attachment to ideology which is nothing short of self-induced mind control. Alongside these types are the calculating liars who are driving the march to a One World Government.

How dare I say such a 'hateful' thing? How dare I speak out against Internationalism? More to the point, how dare anyone who cherishes freedom, NOT speak out against Internationalism?

The Internationalist propagandists maintain that the merging of nations and the free movement of diverse peoples contributes to the cultural enrichment of humanity as a whole. They use the nonsense word 'multi-culturalism' to describe this blending of cultures. The problem is that behind this fanciful term, the reality is that rather than cultures merging to form a greater culture, the effect is akin to the addition of differing paints to one another - the result is a bland mess devoid of beauty or any worthy character.

The dream of the Internationalists of a multi-cultural interdependent world rests on the ability of of every culture to tolerate (and be tolerated by) every other. To be successful in their endeavour, the multi-culturalists must impose their ideology on every facet of life, not even food is free from the Internationalist ideology. For example, a meat eater who does not support Halal slaughter, will find his or her personal choice denied in the interest of merging Islamic practices with their secular and spiritually opposed cultural counterparts. Thus one culture has to give way to the other. In this case (as in every other!) it is the more vocal culture which triumphs over the others, and in the case of European Christian culture, the imposition of alien dietary measures means the destruction of a part of the indigenous culture. Multi-culturalism is a lie.

The driving force of Internationalism is an economic one. In the above example, the imposition of Halal slaughter is justified as necessary on religious grounds, insofar as there are no religious restrictions on meat-eating people to avoid such meat. Thus it is seen as better for all meat to undergo such ritual sacrifice in order to avoid restricting the ability of observers of the Qu'ran to purchase meat. The average brain-washed consumer who has swallowed decades of multi-cultural propaganda, will accept the ritual slaughter of animals in order to not appear 'racist' or 'Islamophobic'.

In a nation such as England which refers to itself as a 'nation of animal-lovers', the kowtowing to multiculturalism is an acceptance of a thought process which runs counter to the indigenous mindset, and in in essence an abandonment of the innate culture. Those who stand up for their principles are labelled as haters by the liberal mafia by the association of opposition to ritual slaughter with opposition to people of a different religion. The result? The standardisation of meat production is achieved with maximisation of profit to the Establishment, with any opposition on animal welfare grounds silenced as hateful opposition to Muslims and Islam as a whole. Oddly, the Talmudic aspect of ritual slaughter is carefully kept away from public attention, with any opposition kept trained on the Islamic dimension. Surely this must be a coincidence and nothing to do with the dietary demands of the diabolical global rulers?

Meat production is but one example of the lie of multi-culturalism. Where cultural standards clash, there can be no multi-culturalism, only the existence of rival cultures which will coexist only until such time as one or the other gives way. In Europe especially, the indigenous culture is being displaced. Opposition to the erosion of culture tends to manifest as opposition to the new communities which have been brought into previously mono-ethnic lands. This allows the architects of Internationalism to continue their anti-cultural agenda virtually unopposed. Rolling a pig's head into a Mosque in Europe may temporarily amuse an individual who instinctively feels the need to do something to halt the destruction of his or her cultural identity, but it will not have any impact whatsoever on the forces who have manipulated the migration of Muslims into Europe. The Internationalists sitting in Government are more than happy to provoke indigenous anger against the new-comers, which can then be used to justify the introduction of further draconian legislation to silence free speech under the lie of protecting minority rights and promoting equality and diversity. Hot-headed stupidity will not help anyone. Think before you act!

There is no easy answer to our predicament. We are now in a situation where our Governments are our enemies. Whether it is the treacherous politicians in the Dáil allowing foreign Police on Irish soil, or the Reichstag passing legislation to assist pædophile infiltration of German schools, we cannot rely on the Establishment to help us. We have to face the fact that our legal, political, economic and religious Establishments have been compromised to the point of comprising the greater part of the visible enemy. Our enemies are not going to come to our rescue! We have to become self-reliant and separate from these institutions.

The answer to Internationalism is not a return to Nationalism, but rather a radical departure from the old systems. What we need is to build organic communities which are self-policing and self-governing. Our loss of liberty is a direct result of our acceptance of the ability of others to control our lives. The current superstates are a logical extension of the large nation states, which merged the wholesome regions (countries) which preceded them. We need to stop thinking of ourselves as Germans, but as Westphalians, Bavarians etc. We are not British, but West Saxons, Mercians, Yorkshiremen. Rather than identify with Washington DC, look to your local county.

We need to restore the natural State. Internationalism only exists because we allow it to. We need to give up the imperialist pretensions we have been handed and start to see ourselves as the sources of authority, not some remote President or Monarch. Our natural Government is the tribe. That may be impracticable right now, but it is what we need to march towards. The movement of people across the globe occurs for one reason only - because the opportunities are better away than at home. We need to be self-reliant and take care of our own. When there is no longer a pull factor, people will not leave their homelands. When we create all we need locally, and trade only with our neighbouring ethno-States, the reliance on slave labour from China will collapse - which is great news for the exploited Chinese too.

Internationalism means the assimilation of all cultures into a mono-culture of soul-less materialism. Real multi-culturalism comes from the preservation of distinct peoples in their places of origin. That is our choice - a beautiful and varied world with every possible way of life, cherished and respected, or an anti-human international abomination, a living death for humanity.

Equality. Just what exactly is meant by this word? Does it mean sameness? Or maybe it means of equal worth, reducing the object of the term to monetary value? It has become quite clear that even to the pushes of the neo-con/neo-communist lunacy, the meaning of the word is meaningless, for why else would they expand the politically correct nonsense word into the ludicrous phrase, "equality and diversity"?

The brain-washed, (and more often than not, the unwashed) will parrot the answer to the above question with some nice sounding drivel about Equality meaning that everyone should be treated in the same way, and that no one should be treated differently because of their (by which the Politically Correct buffoon means his or her)...take a deep breath...Gender, Gender Identity, Gender Alignment/Re-alignment Status, Ethnicity, Nationality, Language, Sexuality, Sexual Orientation, Sexual Preference, HIV Status, AIDS Status, Physical Ability Status, Mental Functioning Capacity, Culture, Religion/Belief System (or lack of), Marital Status, Dietary Preference, Height, Weight, Age, Mental Age, Pregnancy, Carer Issues, etc etc ad nauseum. The cretin (sorry, rational thinkingly disadvantaged person) will reel of the list in the manner of a Hare Krishna mantra, and if questioned about the fact that the list is one of differences, state that this is what Diversity is all about!

In a nutshell, the hard of thinking and the politically corrupt will tell you, with no trace of a grin, that Equality and Diversity means treating everyone in exactly the same manner whilst being fully conscious of the massive differences between each individual, and ensuring that everyone is treated according to those differences! I really wish I was making this up, but alas this is the all pervading pattern of thought in modern Britain.

The lunacy of political correctness has seen words removed from the English language lest they offend people who are so mentally unstable that they need to be removed from society and placed in asylums for their own good. These paranoid creatures who think everyone is out to get them, have been joined by greedy opportunists who can see that money can be made by suing people for saying words which they consider (or claim to consider) 'hurtful and 'discriminatory'. The people who have imposed political correctness on us have made it a dangerous philosophy precisely by applying the full force of the law to transgressors of the new thought pattern, with heavy fines, loss of work and imprisonment for people who dare to speak the forbidden truth of human nature and of right and wrong.

Westminster is called the 'Mother of Parliaments', by which it is supposed to be taken that modern democracy was given to the world after being created in London, and that this is something to be proud of. A study of the word 'democracy' shows that except at the smallest possible scale, in groupings where everyone knows everyone else personally, it is unworkable. What we have in Britain is a system of corruption whereby the real rulers retain power, and the puppets who pass for government get rich at the expense of the masses, who have no real say whatsoever. Democracy has been called mob rule - in reality it is despotism hidden behind the pretense of mob rule. It is a system to be ashamed of, and one which has been used to facilitate the total control of the people's thoughts and words, for the benefit of the parasitical few, under the lie of being for the good of all - and not just in Great Britain, but in every nation where this cancerous political system has spread.

Equality and Diversity is a phrase which the Establishment use to beat the people into servitude. The Police State which is being built around us is not one of CCTV and crushing taxation, but a system of paranoia and fear. Certainly the surveillance technology is a part of it, but not as a method for tracking people who disagree with the Establishment (the quality of the footage is, in the main, laughable, and with thought, the system is evadable). Rather, CCTV is used to create a feeling of powerlessness against the all-mighty State. The real Police State is built on the mutual suspicion of the people and the willingness to report one another for saying naughty words, not recycling, or any of the multitude of sins we have allowed 'our' Government to impose on us by the simple act of failing to say NO.

When we start speaking in the plural ('they/their') to discuss a single individual ('he or she/him or her/his or hers'), we are collaborating with our oppressors by using Equality-speak. When we start calling pieces of slate in a classroom 'chalkboards' rather than 'blackboards' for fear of offending someone with dark skin who most bizarrely identifies with the slate (does anyone do that?), we are helping to destroy our own language and are acquiescing with the destruction of our ability to think - blackboards are not made of chalk! Think about it. When we speak of the legal recognition of two sodomites or lesbians living together as 'marriage', we are desecrating a solemn religious institution and, should the 'gay' couple go on to adopt a child and bugger the poor creature (paedophilia is predominately homosexual) we are guilty of placing the infant in harms way by failing to stand up and defend morality and the real natural normal family.

Equality and Diversity are more than buzzwords from the Frankfurt School, which should have died when the USSR collapsed. No, Equality and Diversity is a very real danger to our generation, and should we continue as accomplices to the destruction off all that is decent and good, to the generations which follow. Communism did not collapse, it triumphed un-noticed by infiltrating our education system. Communism is about concentrating wealth in the hands of the few at the expense of the many. It merged easily with finance capitalism, because it IS finance capitalism! In the West we were spared the social consequences because we had our strong sense of national pride, our religion, our culture, and our morality to give us the strength to see evil for what it is, and to oppose it. Political Correctness has removed our natural spiritual defence and made us ripe for total enslavement, the likes of which not even Stalin's victims would have feared possible.

We have to say No to the whole system of political correctness. Look to nature and you will see the reality of Equality. There is none! Equality does not exist. It is ironic that the pushers of Darwinism use the lie that we are all equal; all the same. From a biological outlook this is beyond ridiculous. As professed atheists, how dare they claim we are all created the same - how can that be if there is no Creator? Of course, the Atheism of the Elite is all for show, they know there is a God, and more to the point there is a Devil - who they serve. They also know that God gave humanity free will, thus making any 'Equality' spiritual (in the sense of being equally without sin until choosing otherwise), not material as the pc liars advocate.

We have to stop this nonsense now. We must reclaim our words, and use them in the real sense. To be Gay means to be having a good time, to be happy, not to be a degenerate who is so enamoured with his own physique that he tries to have sex with himself by having sex with another man and fantasising the other man is him. It is ok to say blind people can't see! How can we help people who are physically disabled if we treat them as if they were just like us? Calling someone from Pakistan a Paki is just shorthand for Pakistani, and there is no shame in that. Paki means Pure - it is a high complement to a Muslim. We need to stop allowing our enemies to tell us how to think. We need to act like grown adults and take responsibility for our own lives, and not allow the Wolf in Sheep's clothing, the Nanny State, to think for us and lead us by the hand into the Police State.

We are building our own prison by indulging liberal fantasies that we can defy nature and become Equal by legislating our innate differences out of existence. We need to take a step back and see reality afresh - and live in it. Our enemies are developing the technology to keep us enslaved, but they can only do that if we allow them to mentally enslave us now. Their control is an illusion and all we need to break it is to refuse to cooperate and to actively defy them.

We Britons have been divided against each other by our real enemies in the Establishment through their puppets in Governments of every hue. Now that we have the farce of a Coalition Government containing the 'mortal enemies' of Tory Conservatives and Whigg Liberals, surely the idea that the people who claim to lead us are anything but puppets cannot be taken seriously by anyone not crippled by their media lie machine. We are governed by a financial cabal of bankers and royal parasites and our parties are for show. We must re-examine events with focus upon the hidden powers. Perhaps this way we can understand events, and make sure we cannot be fooled into supporting our enemies again.

A vital area to examine is the reality of the 'British-Irish' Conflict, and in particular the phoney resistance movements which purport to protect sections of the British family of nations from other sections. An unpopular but appropriate place to start is with the IRA.

The IRA was created as a fighting front for the Irish Republican Brotherhood, which is a Masonic order. The drive towards a single cultureless mongrelised world required the destruction of any form of unity in the 'Old World Order'. That made it essential to smash the power houses, of which Britain was one.

The soft underbelly of the British homeland was Ireland. Working together with their Masonic brothers in the Orange Lodge, the IRB stirred up religious tensions to foment divisions amongst the British peoples. The ancient name of the Irish is Scotti, and it is from theses people that the lowland Scots came. The Irish are as much a part of the British family as are the Anglo-Saxons, Celtic English, Welsh, Picts, Manx et al. The Freemasonic mafia worked on the memories of the brutalisation of the Irish by the tyrannical Cromwells, leading people into rival camps from which to attack one another. The whole idea was to destabilise the British Isles, and pit Briton against Briton in a fratricidal war.

The Irish are not stupid. They refused to play the game, and continued to live in peace with their British brothers and sisters. In the absence of violence, the Masonic Establishment created the IRA and UVF. These organisations were not grass roots groups which sprang up to defend their own communities, as the propagandists claim - indeed there were no antagonistic communities to speak of. The leaders were (and are today) Freemasons. The first 'soldiers' were indeed soldiers - but members of the British Army, not outraged civilians, aka 'terrorists'. In time, manipulated individuals may have entered the ranks of the organisations (in truth, organisation), but the leaders remain State operatives.

The likes of Martin McGuiness are brother Masons with their Orange counterparts, and are only 'enemies' in public to maintain the myth. The Irish tricolour has the colours Orange and Green sitting next to the central colour, White. This is to show hide the truth in plain sight, knowing that most people will not be able to see it for all the lies they have swallowed. The colour White, by the way, symbolises the puppets masters behind the Orange and Green partners in crime. White is the colour of the Light Bringer - Lucifer, God of Freemasonry, as worshipped by the Rothschilds and other figures in the British Establishment.

The rival factions in Northern Ireland have become real at the local level due to the horrific crimes committed by the MI5 operatives in the paramilitaries on both sides. The truth is that the rivalry is as real the the Labour - Conservative rivalry in Westminster or the Fianna Fáil - Fine Gael rivalry in the Dáil. Just as the official parties of the London and Dublin parliaments have no real policy differences, nor have the political mouthpieces of the paramilitaries. You will never hear Sinn Féin or Progressive Unionist Party condemning the racial genocide of the people by non-European invasion. You will not hear them expose the Global Warming lie. They will not speak or act in a way which differentiates them from the Establishment, because at the highest level, they are part of the Establishment.

Don't get drawn into the Masonic false flag operation in Ulster. They want us to hate each other so they can implement more Police State measures for our 'defence' from the criminals they create. The Red Shield of the Rothschilds sits in the centre of the British Ulster flag, with its Yellow mirror in the centre of the Irish Ulster Flag. They are laughing at us.

Were it not for the evil committed by the British (internationalist-Kabbalist) Establishment, the peoples of the Isles would still live together in one nation (possibly a federal one) as brothers and sisters, which is precisely what we are. No Surrender to the Internationalist Rothschild Agenda. Our destiny is Unity for all Britons from Norfolk to Galway. Tiocfaidh ár lá.

Misguided believers in the færy tale of 'democracy' expected that by voting out the Marxist Labour Party, all the ills which had beset the United Kingdom during the thirteen years of Labour misrule would evaporate and freedom would magically be restored. It is testament to the success of the indoctrination system that voters swallowed the lies of the politicians and turned out in significant numbers to mark a cross against the name of the puppet which offered the most convincing fable to appease their individual whims.

The result of the election was the formation of a coalition government comprised of the Cohenservative Party and the Libertine Dæmoncrats. The controlled media promised that the new regime would bring about 'change'. Just exactly how much change resulted from the election can be gauged by the mini-Budget which took place last month.

The mini-Budget was vaunted by the media as the solution to the economic crisis ushered in by the previous administration. Oversimplifying world economics and politics to such an extent that without decades of 'dumbing down', no one would believe such ludicrous propaganda, the media presented the fantastic idea that the economic mess which had overcome the UK was solely caused by politicians, and could be reversed by replacing one set of politicians with another. Those who believe this nonsense most probably write letters to the fictional characters in 'soap operas' such as Eastenders.

So, looking beyond the lies, what has the Coalition Government achieved thus far? Well, as the good little puppets that they are, they have continued the anti-human agenda of the puppets who preceded them. Last month's Budget was a travesty. The media dutifully exaggerated any whiff of tax cuts then downplayed all aspects which will be detrimental to the nation. For example, the media emphasis on the additional £1000 tax allowance was practically orgasmic. One would be forgiven for believing that the British worker was £1000 richer thanks to the benevolence of the Coalition Government, but under closer scrutiny, the truth is that as the starting rate for tax is 10%, the individual tax payer will only gain £100 per year from this extension to the Allowance, not £1000 - big difference! Thus the British Worker will be less than £2 a week better off.

Along with the distorted coverage of the increased Tax Allowance, the media dutifully downplayed the hike in Value Added Tax (a tax used to enrich the bureaucrats of the Soviet European Union), which at 20% of all goods purchased (previously 15% at the end of 2009), will wipe out the insulting tax 'allowance' increase for the entire year, almost instantly. Yet again, the media crow over tax cuts but ignore tax hikes, and the fact that every man, woman and child in the UK (excepting those in the Establishment fold who can afford tax avoidance measures) will be significantly worse off as a result of the Government's tax grabs.

The outright lies of reducing the tax burden were a cynical attempt to pull the wool over the eyes of the people. The puppets in Westminster are simply continuing the old game of one administration creating debt, followed by an alleged opposite regime which has to reduce services in order to reduce the debt. The cycle continues regardless of the identities of the puppets, but then considering that the puppets are manipulated by the same puppet masters, it could be no other way. Whichever party is given the role of Government, be it Masonic Red (Labour), or Masonic Blue (Conservative), the Establishment maintains control, and wealth is redistributed away from the people into the coffers of the real power - the kabbalists of the City of London. An aspect of the Budget which scarcely received any attention was the passing of official control of the economy to the private bankers who call themselves the Bank of England. These monsters, centred on the Rothschilds and the Crown, have long ruled Britain's economy from behind the scenes. Now they are acknowledged as rulers of the economy - with the 'spin' that their position is one of benevolence!

So much for the 'change' in the country at the macro level, but what of the micro level? Surely the new regime must be delivering on its promise to unravel the Police State and the Puerile Communism which is systematically destroying Great Britain from within?

We have been told that the country is in dire financial straits, and to save our nation we must all make sacrifices. Not the banksters who are profiting like never before, not the international cartels who are devouring every last service and industry, not to mention land and property, no, it is we the people who are being made to pay for the destruction of our nation and to finance our own serfdom. The wars for Greater Israel and the destruction of Islam are to continue apace - with money ring fenced for the butchery of innocent Middle and Near Easterners. Where money is to be saved is by slashing expenditure by 25% in vital services such as Social Security and Healthcare. As a public servant myself, I am well placed to see these cuts in practice.

One would hope that politically carcinogenic and financially wasteful entities designed for the purpose of social engineering would be abolished in order to save money which could be spent of services for the good of the people. One would hope that the ridiculous and counter productive CCTV system would be turned off with resources focused instead on restoring a sense of nationhood rather than a culture of fear and criminality. One would...but then, that would be the way of sanity, and sadly, sanity is distinctly lacking in the administrative systems in Great Britain.

Rather than reducing the grip of Political Correctness, the new puppets have accelerated it. I have myself had to undertake 'Equality and Diversity' training, which is something I managed to avoid under Labour, but is now mandatory, and a legal requirement for all public and civil servants. The only way to avoid such mendacious thought policing is to resign from the public sector.

So, what is this 'Equality and Diversity' training which is so important that refusal to undergo it will result in breach of contract and instant dismissal? No doubt there are various forms by which the training is presented. For myself, it took the form of an excruciating and insulting act of herd control. I was made to sit in a room with about a dozen colleagues taking part in general exercises concerning general work issues such as Data Protection, Health and Safety, and Fire Legislation. This was spread across the best part of a working day. The objective was to personalise the training so to create a shared identity and a reluctance to 'rock the boat' by speaking with a different opinion to the group. The Equality and Diversity section of the training came at the end, once the group had been moulded into a malleable and obedient unit.

The common perception of Civil Servants is that we are robots, repeating the dictat of Government without thinking. The Establishment like to maintain this perception, and are actively attempting to turn it to a reality. Equality and Diversity Training in the Public Sector is part of a strategy to dehumanise those in the employ of the State, with the rest of society to follow. I relate here the methods used to brainwash State employees in order to warn the general public of the type of thinking which is set to destroy what is left of western society.

Suitably numbed by hours of tedium, we were harangued with diatribes about the blessings of multi-culturalism and the necessity to adapt to a changing world where cultures and peoples cross all boundaries. This is the dogma of internationalism, and the fact that it is mandatory for State employees speaks volumes. We were told that it is essential that everyone who comes into contact with the service must be treated as an individual and that all obstacles to accessing the service must be removed. This appeal to human decency and fairness shows an understanding of the English psyche. Sadly, this understanding has become a weapon against us. Numbed by tedium, we were now put into a position where any objection to the propaganda being spewed forth would be construed as refusal to do one's best for the public at large - which is tantamount to treason in the public sector.

Our beloved Coalition Government has gone further than any of its predecessors in advancing the anti-human internationalist cult. People in the employ of the State are being used as guinea pigs for total societal control. We are being subjected to psychological warfare techniques designed to break our resistance. The wider use in society as a whole comes through the media, legal and financial apparati, employing the exact same techniques of wearing the resistance of the individual down and manipulating what may be considered 'right' and decent to the point where opposition to evil is considered the greatest possible evil.

Having created an atmosphere which could be described as trance-like, the Equality and Diversity trainers moved the emotional and psychological abuse to a deeper level. We were each given cards with words such as 'Nigger', 'Paki', 'Gypo', 'Irish', Gay', 'Girl', 'Picnic', 'Nitty-Gritty', 'Poof' et al, and told to walk to a board with two intersecting circles upon it, and place the word in the left circle, right circle, or central point where the circles mixed. The left circle was for words which are always acceptable, the right for words which are never acceptable, and the central point for words which may be acceptable depending upon context. Each participant had to walk from the back of the room, to the board, and back again, watched by trainers and trainees alike. Once all words were in place each participant had to explain why he or she had placed the word in the chosen position.

To my disgust, but to no surprise, practically everyone placed the politically forbidden words in the unacceptable section, and when asked to describe the words, spoke in embarrassed and apologetic tones. The trainer began the ordeal of questioning by apologising for the 'evil' word 'Nigger', which made her sick to the stomach - she was actually tearful at this point. I am happy to say that although most of the trainees reacted as politically correct Pavlovian dogs, not everyone did. When my turn came, I explained that words have always changed meaning throughout time, and that all words are valid. I spoke of the danger of banning words as this was a short step to banning thought and extinguishing freedom for everyone. I stood my ground and placed all my allocated words in the acceptable circle. The trainers were at a loss as to how to handle my refusal to play the game. Discussion broke out amongst the group with people agreeing that the Equality and Diversity training was an insult to our professionalism and a waste of resources in these days when we are being told all services must achieve financial cutbacks! The training was cut short by the trainers who couldn't cope with a polite, well argued and firm rebuttal of political correctness.

We are in dire times. We must all resist. It is amazing how lap dogs of political correctness can be awoken from their trances by the example of a few individuals who will not submit to the herd. The Establishment is desperate to silence criticism of its agenda, but without the cooperation of those it employs, it has no chance. I experienced first hand the victory of reason over Sovietism. If we can replicate this, their house of cards will fall. We are that House and we can choose to bring it crashing down.

There is no democracy in Great Britain, or any other nation under the heel of the banking cartel. The only change that the election has brought is of one set of inanely grinning puppets for another. It is becoming increasingly obvious that the rulers do not represent the ruled. This is to our advantage. The more the Establishment loses its bond with the people, the less chance for the internationalists to achieve their goal. Times are dire, but ripe with potential. We must not waste the opportunities given us - no matter how small. In the end, we will win by using the enemy's arrogance and tyrrany against them.