Beullogeo's

What is the best way for a ruling minority to ensure victory over the peoples of the world? The best way must surely be to pit them against one another and to make them hate that wherein lies their greatest chance for salvation. The slave must learn to hate the very concept of freedom and to identify full with the slave owner. This can be seen clearly in the popular use of the words 'Fascist' and 'Fascism' as terms of abuse, especially by people who purport to fight internationalism.

In the 'Truther' movement we have shills such as Alex Jones constantly described the 'New World Order' as Fascist. The rationale for the use of this term is that Benito Mussolini himself stated that the Italian system known as Fascism could better be described using the label Corporatism. Corporatism today has a different meaning to Corporatism in Mussolini's day. Just as the word 'Gay' meaning happy and care-free has been changed by the social engineers to mean homosexual (and such people are generally miserable and constantly worried in reality - not gay at all), so has the term Corporatism been altered to take on a meaning which is the diametrical opposite of its true meaning.

So what did Mussolini mean by Corporatism? Mussolini created a system in which the people were served by the economy, rather than be servants to it, as was the case before Fascism, and since its demise. Mussolini recognised that Nationalisation stifled productivity. Looking at the example of Bolshevik Russia where the State dogma was Marxist-Leninism, the socialisation of the means of production could be clearly seen to be to the detriment of the proletariat, rather than to their benefit as the theory maintained. Socialisation (nationalisation) took power away from the people and handed it to the bureaucrats in the Party, or to be more precise to those who controlled the Party: the international banking cabals.

Realising that the economic system of Communism was but a ruse for taking wealth and property from the people, Mussolini rejected nationalisation. He then turned to examine the alleged opposite of Communism, known as Capitalism. Under that system, due to its inherent contradictions, the concentration of wealth and property would inevitably become concentrated in fewer and fewer hands. We can see the truth of this today with international conglomerates absorbing entire industries, and with the IMF taking over entire countries. The basis of Capitalism was, and remains, the Banking System. The massive corporations which own everything are backed by the banking cartels without which they wouldn't exist. Unrestricted Privatisation under the 'free market' led to the exact same cabals taking control of the wealth, property and resources of the people, as its phony opposite, Communism.

Seeing the fallacy of materialism behind both its Communist and Capitalist masks, Mussolini sought to create a new system under which the people would be protected from the banking system and would genuinely be in charge of their own lives. The system he came up with was labelled Fascism. The term Fascism was coined due to Italy's history as the home of the Roman Republic. The Roman Fasces represented the idea of strength through unity. A single rod can easily be broken, but a bundle of rods can prevail against the harshest attempt to snap it. The ribbons tying the rods emphasised the exercise of restraint in the use of power, as symbolised by the axe atop the bundle. For Mussolini the Fasces represented the strength in unity of the Workers' Union, the Peasants' Co-operative, or the Artisans' Guild. The international cabals sought to break the workers etc and could do so easily if they were disunited (as under Capitalist of Communist serfdom), but coming together as a bundle, they could withstand the machinations of the bankers.

The Corporatism of Fascism emphasises the need of workers and managers to co-operate with one another for the benefit of the nation. This opposes the class warfare of Communism and Capitalism in that the people as a whole are a part of an organic nation, united in purpose and in spirit. Ownership by foreigners is not allowed due to the outsider having no allegiance to the nation. Corporatism in the modern sense should be referred to as monopoly internationalism, and has no interest in the welfare of the people. Modern Corporatism is exploitation for the benefit of the 'elite'. With institutions such as the IMF we can see the modern corporate ideology in action, with mass unemployment, wars for profit and the destruction of unique cultures and peoples to be replaced by a bland inhuman mass of consuming-producing materialists devoid of the essence of humanity. Corporatism as spoken of by Mussolini is its exact opposite. Profits are to be shared amongst the people, whose culture is to be strengthened by the sense of being part of a national family of equal worth but diverse roles.

Those who label the 'New World Order' Fascist due to the existence of international monopoly corporations as a focal point, are either ignorant of the reality of Fascism, or are dis-info agents acting to stop the people ably defending themselves by opting out of the false dichotomy of materialism. Alex Jones belongs to the latter, and sadly do his followers who swallow his propaganda without doing their own research.

The term 'Political Correctness' was coined in the Soviet Union to prevent dissent. Those who were out of step with the ruling clique were deem to have politically incorrect thoughts. They were forced to publicly recant and apologise for having independent thought, and were often killed for such a heinous crime. Their writings were destroyed and history was rewritten to ensure they appeared as enemies of the people. Fascism has undergone such an attack.

A modern nation which could be described as Fascist is Libya. The government is structured in such a way as to allow full representation of individuals and guilds in the national assembly. The Zionist butchers of NATO are anti-Qadaffi precisely because he puts his people first and has built a nation with a unity of purpose and spirit in which class warfare is not allow. The Green Book is simply Fascism ethnically tailored to suit Arabs. Look at the amazing works of Libya, such as the Great River Project. The Libyan system seeks only to better the Libyan people; it has no imperialist pretensions; it seeks to mould the people together into a strong nation - like rods held together by the ribbon of justice. Those who seek to destroy Libya are anti-Fascist. Internationalism is anti-Fascist. To describe the internationalist agenda as Fascist is ignorant to the point of propagandising for the globalist banking cabal.

We need to stop using the words of our enemies. We need to stop unwittingly using the dogma of political correctness. By accepting that anything Fascist must be evil, we are aiding our oppressors. How can we overcome our enemies if we willingly wear the blinkers of their creating and conform to what they deem politically correct? There is much to be gained from the study of National Syndicalism, Fascism and Strasserite National Socialism. These ideologies were tainted by the propaganda of the enemies of humanity, especially due to the actions committed by people claiming to uphold these beliefs who were in fact put in place by the internationalists to undermine the systems from within.

Open your eyes. Take off the blinkers. Do your own research. If you speak and act as your own gaoler, you will never be free.

The tide is turning in the UK. Our military are renowned the world over for being the fiercest fighters with the highest discipline. They are also very accurately described as Lions led by Donkeys. With very few exceptions, the Lions have been led to the slaughter by the Donkeys in charge and have obeyed orders unquestioningly. The most infamous example of this behaviour is the destruction of British youth in the Great War. The brave men who did refuse to 'go over the top' to meet certain death for no reason, were shot as cowards by order of the men in Whitehall who ensured that they were personally never in the firing line.

After requesting for 500 volunteers to take redundancy from the British Army, over 1,000 have applied. These include 52 Colonels, 6 Brigadiers and 48 Majors - and many others with a long service history. A poll on the Army Rumour Service (ARRSE) recorded a 2/3 majority who would take voluntary redundancy if they could.

Why are the soldiers leaving? Because they joined up to defend their nation, not to murder foreigners in their own lands for the benefit of corrupt politicians and internationalist corporations. Being given inadequate support in terms of equipment that can be relied upon has certainly not helped. Also, the majority of the military are sick to the back teeth of the politicisation of the army. The situation in the British military is not dissimilar to the inclusion of kommissars in the ranks of the Red Army at the worst period of the Soviet Union. Another major factor remains the natural British sense of fair play which still permeates our culture - in spite of massive propaganda through the media and education systems to reduce our people to materialistic drones. It seems that Political Correctness cannot over-ride humanity. When decent men and women are ordered to murder civilians who are no threat to the Motherland, as we are seeing now, the healthy response is to firmly and with dignity, say No.

Bravo to the good men and women of the military who have refused to blindly obey the parasitic vermin who run the UK, and are leaving the military en masse rather than serve our oppressors. The highest patriotic duty is to oppose those who threaten the nation - especially the enemies within.

News link here

Following the hijacking of the Egyptian Peoples' Revolution, it should be clear to everyone that to achieve freedom, it is not enough to simply changing the puppets who control our lives, we need to change the ideas which underpin the Establishment.

Those who argue for bloody revolution but cannot see beyond the ousting of the hated leaders are worse than those who glibly shuffle along accepting the status quo. They are worse because unlike the apathetic masses, the self-appointed leaders of revolution promote actions which give the Establishment the excuse to brutalise the opposition, even to the point of murder.

An armed struggle in the days of NATO hegemony is completely unfeasible. Naturally, as in the case of Libya, armed resistance to the internationalist machine is vital for survival. Except for exceptional circumstances, the idea of taking up arms against the global enemy is ludicrous.

People who advocate violence as a solution to our ills may be motivated by righteous hatred of our enemies, or they may be assets of the State. The problem we have is that due to the infiltration of the Establishment into every organisation with potential to effect a change, it is increasingly difficult to differentiate between genuine activists and individuals manipulated (or directed) to do the bidding of the ruling elite. As a rule of thumb, anyone who advocates violence (except for defence), should be treated as a servant of the Establishment - whether by manipulation, coercion or by virtue of being in the employ of the security services, is of no real importance.

Exterminating the 'Royal' Family and every single individual carrying there genes would be the greatest service imaginable to humanity as a whole, but it is hardly a realistic strategy! They certainly must be dealt with at some point for humanity to have a chance of survival, but that can only come as a result of attaining freedom. Extermination could come in the form of preventing them breeding so wiping out their gene pool in a single generation, but this is to digress. We need to sideline them and remove all support for the despotic reign. That doesn't require blood-letting, indeed such action would be counter-productive as it would allow anti-Monarchists to be labelled as terrorists. We need to open peoples' minds, not reinforce stereotypes of anti-establishmentarians as wild-eyed and dangerous lunatics.

The ruling class would love for the people to rise up and attack their puppets. Politicians can be readily replaced with no threat to the true rulers. Buildings can be rebuilt. What we must strive for is a revolution of ideas which will make the Establishment obsolete. We need to create our own society which exists parallel to the criminal society which we are currently a part of.

Real change comes from self-education and the transmission of understanding to others. Knowledge is Power - our rulers have always known this. The destruction of the Library of Alexandria was a deliberate act to remove important information from the public sphere. The books in the Library were not lost, only the building - the knowledge was hidden by the Elite who still have it to this day. Likewise the sacking of the Baghdad Museum saw the removal of the Sumerian Library to a location known only by the international cabal - the existence of information about the true nature of those who rule us had to be taken from Iraq lest it be translated and made available to the people. They have been reducing the information available to the public for millenia. It is our responsibility to ensure they do not complete their goal of forever enfeebling the masses and making a rebirth of humanity impossible.

We are at a dangerous juncture. The printed medium is rapidly becoming archaic. In true Orwellian style, much literature is not being transferred to the new electronic medium. We can 'do our bit' to keep the old literature alive by scanning any intellectually and culturally important books we have access to - and sharing the created documents as widely as we can. It is vital that we do not merely accumulate documents in electronic format, but print them too. Should our access to digital media be lost, then all our resources held therein will be lost also. A good printer and a safe secure place of storage for documents the elite wish to erase from history could become the last hope for civilisation in an era following an 'accidental' loss of the new technologies we now rely on. Electro-Magnetic Pulse weapons which could erase all digital information globally exist right now. It is surely a matter of time before they are used to consign all forbidden knowledge to the memory hole - all except that which has been saved in print and hidden from detection by the foot soldiers of the State.

We have to act like the hidden rulers. They have monopolised control of the wisdom of the past precisely because that knowledge is the source of their power. We must protect the knowledge available to us in order to ensure the continuation of our species as more than robotic 'goyim' to serve the elite. We must transmit this knowledge to all who are capable of fighting the Establishment. Political Correctness is a tool of our enemies used to frighten us into voluntarily destroying our heritage. We must expose this heinous lie at every opportunity.

Our enemies have access to the knowledge or our ancestors from times before acknowledged history. We have access only to the echoes of our ancestors' knowledge which have not been fully silenced by the censors and looters of the international mafia. We must preserve these echoes at all costs to ensure the link to our past - and future - is not broken. Should we fail, we will lose everything and our enslavers will be victorious in perpetuity.

How do we undertake this task? In practical terms we must seek out important information, keep hard copies for ourselves and provide digital copies to our contacts to preserve in hard form themselves.

What is vital and what is not is hard to say - in a sense, we are looking for links to links to links. Any part of the chain could prove invaluable in piecing together the information we need for survival, and ultimately to overthrow our enemies. Knowledge is power. We cannot defeat our enemies using physical violence (which is not to say we should give up without a fight!), we need to outflank them and reintroduce knowledge which will free the people from their grasp.

If you have any information which the Establishment wishes to silence, now is the time to preserve it and disseminate it. If you have links to information online, such as forbidden literature and hard-to-find books which will almost certainly be confined to history in due course, share those links. Together we have a chance of beating our enemies. Alone we will lose.

The following was sent in as a reply to the article on the victory of the 'Scottish' 'National' Party. The writer has chosen to remain anonymous, which in these days of so-called political correctness, makes much sense. The Police State in the UK is absolute and the idea that using one's real identity will save one from the murderous scum who run this country, is simply ludicrous.

I am publishing this comment as an article, as the writer has knowledge of Scotland which I do not have, and eloquently describes the dire situation north of the border in a manner which demands attention. Thank you anonymous for the following...

I am not a fan of Facebook. I joined the network in order to spread the truth about what is really going on in our troubled world. Every article posted here should (in theory) have automatically been re-posted on Facebook. I'm not interested in the mind-numbing posts about people having a cup of tea, getting stoned, 'hooking up' in the manner of unpaid prostitutes (of both sexes), or the tedious obsession with putting other the lyrics to other peoples' songs online, so I stayed away.

Having been sent the above video by RTR.Org I thought it would be an idea to link from that site to Facebook to increase the amount of information I could get out. Surprise surprise, my Facebook account has been disabled. It would seem that it is not only those who organise en masse who have fallen foul of the censors. I wonder what it is I must have said to offend the parasitic Freemasonic Monarchy-loving Sabattean vermin who run Facebook as an information-gathering front for the CIA/MI5?

If anyone is still on Facebook, perhaps it is time to get off it. We are under surveillance in so many forms it is mind-boggling (especially in the heartland of the Black Nobility, the UK). We do not need to help our enemies by volunteering trivia which can be accumulated for psychological profiling and eventually be used as evidence against us. Be sensible - Get off Facebook - Don't feed the wolves who are relentlessly eating away at our freedom.

I would like to apologise for the length of time it is taking to scan the Tyranny of Ambiguity and make it available for everyone who is interested to read it.

Until recently I was employed as a Civil Servant, working firstly for the Department for Work and Pensions, then for the Department of Health. Due to my increasing inability to keep my mouth shut and blindly obey the diktat of the kommissariat, I came under the scrutiny of the higher level management, who attempted to remove me from my post at every opportunity.

Forced to undergo Sensitivity Training, my natural resistance to the Establishment mind-controllers finally gave my bosses the excuse they needed to start disciplinary measures. Apparently, when told to divide a selection of words into categories of 'acceptable', 'neutral' and 'unacceptable', it is absolutely forbidden to place every single word under the heading 'acceptable' and then proceed to castigate the propaganda administrator for imposing political correctness on the staff. My position became increasingly more precarious following my decision to make a stand, and after months of surveillance of my every activity, an error in procedure from 5 years ago came to light. As a result, I am no longer in the employ of the State.

Since being forced out of the State sector I have had to take any work I have been able to get hold of, in order to survive economically. For that reason my free time has become such that scanning documents has become a near impossibility. I may be financially crippled and bereft of free time, but my conscience is clear. Some may argue it was foolhardy to take a stand against the politicisation of the Civil Service, but the point was reached where I had no choice. I could no longer function as a human being and accept the evil - yes evil - which the Establishment were attempting to inflict on the people, using me as an instrument of their terror.

I will redouble my attempts to get the Sheppard book scanned and ready to read. I thank you for your patience in this matter. Freedom isn't slavery, but working under the boot of the Establishment certainly is.

It is not very often that I find myself speaking favourably about Rabbinical Judaism, but in the light of recent developments in Israel, this bizarre situation has indeed come about.

Have no fear, I have not embraced the Zionist lunacy so favoured by kosher patriots such as the EDL and BNP, rather I have found trends in Israeli society which mirror those throughout the West. The liberal cancer of multi-culturalism which the Rothschilds and their Sabbatean co-religionists have used to undermine the values and morals of the non-Judaic world is now wreaking havoc in the Rothschild State. The poisoners are imbibing and suffering from the poison of their own creation.

Unlike many who would gloat at the destabilisation of the Judaic nation, I find the materialistic assault on the spiritual foundation of Eretz Israel alarming. It is perhaps poetic justice that the people who have engineered the downfall of humanity are now being sucked into the whirlpool of their destructive creation. However, if the owners of the Golem are turning their monster against those who have aided them (wittingly or unwittingly), how then does this affect mankind as a whole?

Internationalism requires the destruction of every nation, culture and faith. The Rothschild Empire has manipulated the people who call themselves Jews into supporting it through a false sense of kinship. In truth, the Sabbateans who hide behind the modern Jews are enemies of these people as every other. The Rothschilds have used the ersatz Jews as a human shield. As human shields are prone to do, the ordinary 'Jews' have received the punishment which the Sabbateans have deserved. Up until now, however, the human shield has been afforded some degree of protection as a cultural entity. This is no longer the case.

We are being herded like cattle into the international slaughterhouse of materialism. Why is the world suffering from the machinations of the internationalist mafia? What has happened to us that has allowed these inhuman monsters to gain such power over our lives? It seems that not many years ago, although intrigue was afoot, the world at large was for all practical purposes immune to the drive towards the global gulag. So what happened to weaken our natural immunity? Why did we let our mortal enemies get the upper hand?

We allowed our enemies to gain mastery over the world by failing to appreciate the danger we were in. Our hidden masters worked against us slowly and subtly, gradually dismantling our defences against them. By corrupting the sciences with wholly improvable theories which undermined the link between the physical and spiritual realms, the hidden enemy reduced the self perception of people from vehicles for the fulfillment of Divine will, to mere consuming and fornicating animals - with no more purpose and direction than a dung beetle. When Christendom transferred its faith from the Spiritual to the Scientific, the tyranny of the international forces of evil took a leap forward - to the detriment of humanity as a whole.

The printed word, which offered the opportunity for a great spreading of knowledge, has become a medium for the spreading of ignorance and falsehood. Darwin's Theory of Evolution provided the justification for Marx's materialist credo, 'Das Kapital', allowing a Talmudic heresy to implant itself in the psyche of the West. The medium of print was seized upon by the enemies of humanity to push a dogma which denies man's rightful place as a link between the spiritual and physical realms. Works by Hegel, Darwin, Marx have demoralised the West to the point where any Talmudic/Kabbalistic lie can be sold to the people. Feminism, Capitalism, Communism, and all manner of anti-human sickness would never have gained acceptance in the general populace but for the Sabbatean control of the printed word.

Beyond the printed word, lies the audio-visual media which to a ridiculous degree has become nearly entirely controlled by the Zionist mafia. Even in the so-called Truth Movement, the presence of Zionist manipulators is evident. One only has to think of shills such as Michael Moore and Alex Jones to see that some of the key figures who purport to fight against the internationalist menace, are in fact actively aiding that menace by leading the resistance down blind alleys and focusing attention upon imaginary enemies and the disposable puppets who may themselves not even realise that they have been given positions of visible authority, solely for the purpose of taking the fall when the people wake up to the fact that all is not well.

We find ourselves at this sorry juncture because we have entrusted others to make decisions for us. By delegating the ability to think critically, we have abrogated the responsibility of understanding which comes with knowledge. By placing faith in others to tell us what to do, how to behave, and in all seriousness, how to live, we have created our own serfdom. The internationalist menace is real enough, but we have allowed it to grow beyond any realistic bounds. By refusing to view the world as adults; by holding steadfastly to the childlike state of absolute trust in 'authority figures', we have become the architects of our demise.

As a species, we have an innate need for family support. We rely upon our parents to nurture us and guide us to adulthood, and in turn we take the burden of responsibility upon our own shoulders as we raise our own children to the best of our abilities. Perhaps the most diabolical aspect of the internationalist war on humanity is the destruction of family and the usurping of the natural role of parents to raise their children from the child state to fully conscious adulthood.

In countries such as Germany, Home Schooling is illegal. Why? Are German parents really so incompetent that they cannot be trusted to give their children the knowledge requisite for survival in the adult world? Or, maybe, just maybe, the Establishment seeks to break the bond between Father, Mother and Child, in order to take charge of every individual, who can then be slotted into the machinery of international materialism?

Across the European Union, anti-Home Schooling legislation either outright forbids the right of parents to parent their own children, or so hampers the parents' ability as to make it practically impossible. An adult response to this obscenity is to refuse to conform and to band together with other parents to raise the communities' children as each community sees fit. The acquiescence and submission to this crime is testament to the success of the Establishment.

We have allowed our enemies to gain power because we have blindly accepted that the experts they give us are more trustworthy than ourselves. We have swallowed the lie that the 'Party' will save us, or the Monarchy, or the 'Team'. Salvation lies within. We have committed treason against our selves and our children by failing to take responsibility for our own lives and to make hard choices. We have wallowed in ignorance, accepting whatever the Establishment tells us. We have become as infants, taking the materialistic toys from our surrogate parents and in return giving doting obedience.

The key to our salvation is to stop blindly obeying the Establishment. We must restore the sacred bonds of Faith, Family and Fatherland. These were the essentials which protected us from the intrigues of the rootless cosmopolitans who were unable to undermine our cultures so long as we stayed true to ourselves and our own ways. These bonds remain our best defence. We need to leave the Establishment kindergarten and face reality as adults. To hell with their shiny materialism. Our way must be to embrace what is wholesome and spiritual. That way we will overcome our adversaries.

Internationalism is the greatest danger facing humanity. We are led into fighting the symptoms of the disease whilst all the while our demise continues unchecked. Whether it is the Global Warming hoax, or the bogus War on Terror (in truth, War OF Terror), our enemies have used their propaganda machinery keep the opposition occupied, with spectres of their own creation. Some of the most idealistic people who should be fighting alongside us, have been tricked into siding with the architects of the global gulag. This is a situation we cannot allow to continue. If we are to defeat our common enemy, we need to reach out to idealists from across the spectrum - even to those who have fallen for the lies of the Establishment and see the defenders of National Freedom as the real enemy, nay, not even, but especially to these idealists.

People with a passionate love of ecological matters have been duped into supporting the imposition of taxation which transfers wealth from the ordinary people into the hands of the Establishment. They have swallowed the lie that pollution is causing the Earth's climate to change, and that only the abolition of national frontiers and private property can stop mass pollution. The multi-national corporations who produce the overwhelming majority of toxic waste have no loyalty to individual countries. Laws enacted to force the corporations to reduce their harmful emissions are laws written by the corporations themselves, who actually increase their profits by trading in carbon credits which are another form of taxation for making the Establishment richer and the people poorer. The environmentalist movement is a God-send to the Establishment, if not a product of it.

With regards to the environment, it is important that we treat our home with respect, and that we do not destroy whole swathes of land in order to maximise the profits of an anti-human elite. The 'green' activists are correct in their assertion that the multi-national conglomerates are killing the seas and wreaking havoc everywhere. However, their solution to these ills - to create Global institutions to control industry - is a false solution. Internationalism does not halt the monopolisation of wealth and power in the hands of the anti-human elite, it fulfills it. The only way to stop the greedy and destructive vast multi-national cartels is to dissolve them into the smallest practicable units of commerce - and to control them at local level. Internationalism increases the power of the polluters, localism restores the rightful place of industry to the servant of the people, not the master.

With the brutal wars of cultural genocide being waged across the globe, a mass of people are sufficiently outraged to demand an end to the slaughter. Whether it is the Zionist conquest of Gaza and the Arab territories west of the River Jordan, or the systematic murder of Afghanis and Iraqis in their own lands, people are waking up to the reality that these are not 'just' wars of defence against terrorism, but very unjust wars carried out by international terrorists using the military capabilities of the Occident. Again, the anti-war campaigners are right to demand an end to the butchery of civilians by military forces acting at the behest of governments in the pay of international finance. Sadly, however, they fail to realise that the governments are no more than puppets.

With puppet Bush being replaced by puppet Obama as figurehead of the branch of international commerce known as the USA - with absolutely no 'Change' in the military policy - all too many peace protesters still focus attention on the politicians in power at the time. There must be a feeling that all is not as it seems, and were it not for the leaders of the anti-war movement keeping the attention on the puppets rather than the puppet masters, the protesters would surely see what becomes glaringly obvious once one abandons the Establishment game of joining easy to control pressure groups. It is easy to fall for the propaganda that the wars in Central Asia are for the procurement of oil and other precious commodities, and that the 'war on terror' is a cover story. However, the oil to be had is but a fringe benefit, and one which scarcely compensates for the vast material outlay in armaments etc for its procurement.

The truth of war can be summed up by the following quote from Gutle Schnaper, wife of Mayer Amschel Rothschild:

"If my sons did not want wars, there would be none."

War is waged in the modern age solely for the consolidation of power in the hands of the internationalist mafia. The anti-war movement is being used to further this agenda with calls for the handing over of the military power of individual nations to international bodies such as the United Nations. The protesters fail to make the connection between the real powers which create wars and the internationalist political bodies which are provided as a solution to war. Using the nonsense label 'anti-Semite' to slander people who can see beyond the smokescreen, the leadership of the anti-war movement are providing invaluable aid to the internationalist cabal. Once all arms are in the hands of the Establishment, no-one will be safe. Giving military power to the UN means removing any possibility of defence from nations which do not submit to the rule of anti-human materialism and global serfdom. The disarmed people of Gaza are allegedly under the protection of the military power of Israel. Entrusting power to the UN would globalise this tragedy.

There are many organisations, with many sincere activists, which should be fighting on the same side. The strength of our common enemy has been to bamboozle us into fighting one another, and thus allowing them to continue their march to total global domination, unhindered by an effective opposition.

The Internationalists have in their ranks the weapon of political correctness. Alongside sincere libertarians, there are die hard communists who worship at the altar of Marx et al, and sincerely believe they are fighting against economic injustice. They have been tricked into aiding the Bankers and their Internationalist brethren by accepting the lie that the abolition of private property and the redistribution of wealth will cure the ills of society. The Internationalist elite plan to redistribute wealth from the people to themselves, and as for abolishing private property, that is a euphemism for stealing our property which they will then control themselves.
Our enemies have changed the meanings of many words so as to confuse, divide and control us. The word 'Fascism' has undergone such manipulation and distortion. The street level anti-Fascists are fighting against the expansion of corporate power - just as Mussolini before them! Sadly their leaders are more attuned with the likes of Stalin, as evidenced by their 'no platform' strategy - basically refusing to talk to anyone who does not conform to the Internationalist ideology, and using 'any means necessary' to silence free opinion.

The anti-Fascist leadership exploit the emotional sensitivities of the rank and file who they use to attack the real enemies of corporate power, thereby protecting the financial elite who the leadership serve. The rank and file are told not to speak to people labelled as Fascists, because such people are evil, and that speaking to 'Fascists' could pollute them with the same sickness. This, from people who not only publicly eschew God, and by so doing render the concepts of good and evil meaningless, but significantly from a leadership who are fully cognisant of the existence of a spiritual plain, and serve a power which can be justifiably described as dæmonic.

Opposition to Internationalism is not evil, indeed it is the very antithesis of the real evil which manifests in materialist-internationalism. Most of us who have been labelled as Fascists, or anti-Semites have incurred that label by daring to openly speak the name of the international menace. The labels used are intended to work at an emotional level, and do not stand close scrutiny - indeed, due to the emotive nature of the labels, in most instances it is a waste of time and energy to debate their merits (or lack of). The label anti-Semite, for instance, is applied to anyone who exposes the banking cartels - even to Jews. the word Fascist is bandied around to such an extent that it can be made to mean anything, and all too often can be used to silence the voice of reason with no debate whatsoever.

We are dangerous to the Internationalists and their lackeys in the anti-Fascist movement because we have seen through their lies, and should we be given the opportunity, we will help free the genuine idealists from the bigots from whom they naïvely take their orders. Thankfully, we do not have to wait for opportunities to be given to us. The contradictions in the professed goals and the actual results of the various protest movements are so obvious once one has the basic information, that we need do little more than infiltrate ourselves into the protest movements and expose the truth from within.

Environmentalists, Peace Campaigners, Free Tibetters, anti-Corporatists, etc, are being conned into supporting global solutions, which in truth will exacerbate the evils they oppose. They are missing key information as to the motives and techniques of the internationalists. Like Pavlov's dogs, they have been conditioned to bark 'Fascist!' and 'Anti-Semite!' at anyone who their leaders dictate they must not speak to. We need to treat these people as a Freemason would treat a brother mason from a lower degree - only revealing as much as he or she is capable of accepting. A lot of the people in the protest movements have been saturated with so much propaganda that they will react violently (often literally) when confronted with evidence of the duplicity of their leaders with the people behind the issues they are fighting. We have to be careful to coax them to the truth at a pace they can handle - albeit as quickly as practicable.

Fighting online is pointless if the battle is not taken to the real world. Taking the 'no platform' stance of the anti-Fascist hierarchy is counterproductive, as is making oneself an obvious target for such people. We need to get involved in all the movements we can, on condition only that we are sufficiently versed in the issues as to blend in un-noticed. We must then reveal the truth to all who we can identify as able to accept it. In this way we will open the minds of the high quality idealists who have been misled through manipulation and distortion of information. Doubtless we will be removed from such organisations, but if we can alert a sufficient number of the best activists, that will not matter one iota.

The Resistance has been subverted to serve our enemies. We need to take it back and undermine our enemies. By denying them the allegiance of the 'useful idiots' (as their own leaders so nicely call them), we can remove their power. Without the support of idealistic activists they are nothing. Let us remove that support and win back our freedom.

Misguided believers in the færy tale of 'democracy' expected that by voting out the Marxist Labour Party, all the ills which had beset the United Kingdom during the thirteen years of Labour misrule would evaporate and freedom would magically be restored. It is testament to the success of the indoctrination system that voters swallowed the lies of the politicians and turned out in significant numbers to mark a cross against the name of the puppet which offered the most convincing fable to appease their individual whims.

The result of the election was the formation of a coalition government comprised of the Cohenservative Party and the Libertine Dæmoncrats. The controlled media promised that the new regime would bring about 'change'. Just exactly how much change resulted from the election can be gauged by the mini-Budget which took place last month.

The mini-Budget was vaunted by the media as the solution to the economic crisis ushered in by the previous administration. Oversimplifying world economics and politics to such an extent that without decades of 'dumbing down', no one would believe such ludicrous propaganda, the media presented the fantastic idea that the economic mess which had overcome the UK was solely caused by politicians, and could be reversed by replacing one set of politicians with another. Those who believe this nonsense most probably write letters to the fictional characters in 'soap operas' such as Eastenders.

So, looking beyond the lies, what has the Coalition Government achieved thus far? Well, as the good little puppets that they are, they have continued the anti-human agenda of the puppets who preceded them. Last month's Budget was a travesty. The media dutifully exaggerated any whiff of tax cuts then downplayed all aspects which will be detrimental to the nation. For example, the media emphasis on the additional £1000 tax allowance was practically orgasmic. One would be forgiven for believing that the British worker was £1000 richer thanks to the benevolence of the Coalition Government, but under closer scrutiny, the truth is that as the starting rate for tax is 10%, the individual tax payer will only gain £100 per year from this extension to the Allowance, not £1000 - big difference! Thus the British Worker will be less than £2 a week better off.

Along with the distorted coverage of the increased Tax Allowance, the media dutifully downplayed the hike in Value Added Tax (a tax used to enrich the bureaucrats of the Soviet European Union), which at 20% of all goods purchased (previously 15% at the end of 2009), will wipe out the insulting tax 'allowance' increase for the entire year, almost instantly. Yet again, the media crow over tax cuts but ignore tax hikes, and the fact that every man, woman and child in the UK (excepting those in the Establishment fold who can afford tax avoidance measures) will be significantly worse off as a result of the Government's tax grabs.

The outright lies of reducing the tax burden were a cynical attempt to pull the wool over the eyes of the people. The puppets in Westminster are simply continuing the old game of one administration creating debt, followed by an alleged opposite regime which has to reduce services in order to reduce the debt. The cycle continues regardless of the identities of the puppets, but then considering that the puppets are manipulated by the same puppet masters, it could be no other way. Whichever party is given the role of Government, be it Masonic Red (Labour), or Masonic Blue (Conservative), the Establishment maintains control, and wealth is redistributed away from the people into the coffers of the real power - the kabbalists of the City of London. An aspect of the Budget which scarcely received any attention was the passing of official control of the economy to the private bankers who call themselves the Bank of England. These monsters, centred on the Rothschilds and the Crown, have long ruled Britain's economy from behind the scenes. Now they are acknowledged as rulers of the economy - with the 'spin' that their position is one of benevolence!

So much for the 'change' in the country at the macro level, but what of the micro level? Surely the new regime must be delivering on its promise to unravel the Police State and the Puerile Communism which is systematically destroying Great Britain from within?

We have been told that the country is in dire financial straits, and to save our nation we must all make sacrifices. Not the banksters who are profiting like never before, not the international cartels who are devouring every last service and industry, not to mention land and property, no, it is we the people who are being made to pay for the destruction of our nation and to finance our own serfdom. The wars for Greater Israel and the destruction of Islam are to continue apace - with money ring fenced for the butchery of innocent Middle and Near Easterners. Where money is to be saved is by slashing expenditure by 25% in vital services such as Social Security and Healthcare. As a public servant myself, I am well placed to see these cuts in practice.

One would hope that politically carcinogenic and financially wasteful entities designed for the purpose of social engineering would be abolished in order to save money which could be spent of services for the good of the people. One would hope that the ridiculous and counter productive CCTV system would be turned off with resources focused instead on restoring a sense of nationhood rather than a culture of fear and criminality. One would...but then, that would be the way of sanity, and sadly, sanity is distinctly lacking in the administrative systems in Great Britain.

Rather than reducing the grip of Political Correctness, the new puppets have accelerated it. I have myself had to undertake 'Equality and Diversity' training, which is something I managed to avoid under Labour, but is now mandatory, and a legal requirement for all public and civil servants. The only way to avoid such mendacious thought policing is to resign from the public sector.

So, what is this 'Equality and Diversity' training which is so important that refusal to undergo it will result in breach of contract and instant dismissal? No doubt there are various forms by which the training is presented. For myself, it took the form of an excruciating and insulting act of herd control. I was made to sit in a room with about a dozen colleagues taking part in general exercises concerning general work issues such as Data Protection, Health and Safety, and Fire Legislation. This was spread across the best part of a working day. The objective was to personalise the training so to create a shared identity and a reluctance to 'rock the boat' by speaking with a different opinion to the group. The Equality and Diversity section of the training came at the end, once the group had been moulded into a malleable and obedient unit.

The common perception of Civil Servants is that we are robots, repeating the dictat of Government without thinking. The Establishment like to maintain this perception, and are actively attempting to turn it to a reality. Equality and Diversity Training in the Public Sector is part of a strategy to dehumanise those in the employ of the State, with the rest of society to follow. I relate here the methods used to brainwash State employees in order to warn the general public of the type of thinking which is set to destroy what is left of western society.

Suitably numbed by hours of tedium, we were harangued with diatribes about the blessings of multi-culturalism and the necessity to adapt to a changing world where cultures and peoples cross all boundaries. This is the dogma of internationalism, and the fact that it is mandatory for State employees speaks volumes. We were told that it is essential that everyone who comes into contact with the service must be treated as an individual and that all obstacles to accessing the service must be removed. This appeal to human decency and fairness shows an understanding of the English psyche. Sadly, this understanding has become a weapon against us. Numbed by tedium, we were now put into a position where any objection to the propaganda being spewed forth would be construed as refusal to do one's best for the public at large - which is tantamount to treason in the public sector.

Our beloved Coalition Government has gone further than any of its predecessors in advancing the anti-human internationalist cult. People in the employ of the State are being used as guinea pigs for total societal control. We are being subjected to psychological warfare techniques designed to break our resistance. The wider use in society as a whole comes through the media, legal and financial apparati, employing the exact same techniques of wearing the resistance of the individual down and manipulating what may be considered 'right' and decent to the point where opposition to evil is considered the greatest possible evil.

Having created an atmosphere which could be described as trance-like, the Equality and Diversity trainers moved the emotional and psychological abuse to a deeper level. We were each given cards with words such as 'Nigger', 'Paki', 'Gypo', 'Irish', Gay', 'Girl', 'Picnic', 'Nitty-Gritty', 'Poof' et al, and told to walk to a board with two intersecting circles upon it, and place the word in the left circle, right circle, or central point where the circles mixed. The left circle was for words which are always acceptable, the right for words which are never acceptable, and the central point for words which may be acceptable depending upon context. Each participant had to walk from the back of the room, to the board, and back again, watched by trainers and trainees alike. Once all words were in place each participant had to explain why he or she had placed the word in the chosen position.

To my disgust, but to no surprise, practically everyone placed the politically forbidden words in the unacceptable section, and when asked to describe the words, spoke in embarrassed and apologetic tones. The trainer began the ordeal of questioning by apologising for the 'evil' word 'Nigger', which made her sick to the stomach - she was actually tearful at this point. I am happy to say that although most of the trainees reacted as politically correct Pavlovian dogs, not everyone did. When my turn came, I explained that words have always changed meaning throughout time, and that all words are valid. I spoke of the danger of banning words as this was a short step to banning thought and extinguishing freedom for everyone. I stood my ground and placed all my allocated words in the acceptable circle. The trainers were at a loss as to how to handle my refusal to play the game. Discussion broke out amongst the group with people agreeing that the Equality and Diversity training was an insult to our professionalism and a waste of resources in these days when we are being told all services must achieve financial cutbacks! The training was cut short by the trainers who couldn't cope with a polite, well argued and firm rebuttal of political correctness.

We are in dire times. We must all resist. It is amazing how lap dogs of political correctness can be awoken from their trances by the example of a few individuals who will not submit to the herd. The Establishment is desperate to silence criticism of its agenda, but without the cooperation of those it employs, it has no chance. I experienced first hand the victory of reason over Sovietism. If we can replicate this, their house of cards will fall. We are that House and we can choose to bring it crashing down.

There is no democracy in Great Britain, or any other nation under the heel of the banking cartel. The only change that the election has brought is of one set of inanely grinning puppets for another. It is becoming increasingly obvious that the rulers do not represent the ruled. This is to our advantage. The more the Establishment loses its bond with the people, the less chance for the internationalists to achieve their goal. Times are dire, but ripe with potential. We must not waste the opportunities given us - no matter how small. In the end, we will win by using the enemy's arrogance and tyrrany against them.

The architects of the global plantation which is being built around the sleep-walking masses are fond of their slogans. They bandy around phrases such as 'Equality and Diversity', 'Multi-Culturalism', 'Democracy', and 'Hate Crimes' in the knowledge that the masses will accept these nonsense slogans without thought. These, and the other phrases pushed by the high priests of political correctness, are more than just nonsense terms, they are in fact psychological weapons.

Political Correctness was a term coined in the Soviet Union, but, as we know to our detriment, cannot be regarded as a historically-confined phenomenon. Rather than viewing the current peddlers of political correctness as being latter day communists, we should see them in the context of the Frankfurt School - they are agents of an anti-human cabal, engaged in a war for the destruction of culture and identity in every part of the world, and they are adept at using psycho-sociological techniques to achieve that end.

The implementers of Political Correctness do not use an armoury of slogans simply because the words sound good to those who use them, but rather because in depth research has found that words have more than a conscious impact. Politically Correct slogans are used as a part of the mind control technique of Neuro-Linguistic Programming. We need to fully appreciate this fact in order to defend our minds from the concerted assault which our enemies are conducting via the manipulation of words and the repetition of concepts.

In many parts of the world, the parasites who sit in Government have enacted laws to combat 'Hate Crimes'. As well as the obvious impact upon freedom of speech that is obtained by incarcerating anyone who objects to the social engineering being carried out against the will of the people, there is a deeper and more dangerous result of such legislation. Far worse than the legislation itself is is the censorship which people have come to self administer. The statement 'you can't say that' is bleated at anyone who broaches serious matters in a manner which is not politically correct. Conversations for many of the self-policing populace have become nothing but trivia, such as what one has watched on the television. For those of us who have removed the accursed mind control box from our homes, the inability of many to speak without reference to the media, is truly exasperating. The television is by far the most powerful medium for mind control, as the programming it issues is absorbed into the sub-conscious, regardless of how selective the viewer may be.

There are people who hold the media at arms length, but are held in submission to the anti-human agenda by their inaction. Rather than formalise a plan to deal to expose our enemies, and deal with the results of their machinations, people who are enraged by the destruction of their culture, by their economic enslavement, and by the obliteration of a future for their children; people who should be in open revolt in defence of all they hold dear, are making the intolerable situation temporarily go away with drugs and alcohol. Why? Because they have subconsciously accepted the lie that they are powerless and that they may as well indulge themselves in unbridled hedonism rather than fight an enemy they cannot hope to beat.

Partly as a result of the controlled media constantly repeating the lie that nations which have a 'democratic' system of political administration are 'free', the people who live in those countries have come to believe that their Governments would never do anything to undermine their freedom. What is not realised is what exactly is meant by 'free'.

People in the Occident falsely believe they can speak and act as they see fit, so long as no law is broken. This is true. However, the existence of laws forbidding speech on a whole raft of issues (race, religion, sexuality, immigration, nationhood et al) gives the lie to the idea that the people have freedom of expression. In reality, the laws curbing free speech are such that one has to be constantly on one's guard that one doesn't inadvertently make a remark (even a joke) which could lead to prosecution. In Great Britain, for example, one can be arrested for expressing an opinion which is 'likely to incite hatred'. This means that quoting anti-goyim/kaffir texts from the Talmud or Qu'ran is forbidden. The offensive texts themselves can be discussed and advocated openly in the religious communities, but cannot be discussed at all by non-believers.

Due to the media programming, the brainwashed masses who believe they are 'free' react with hostility to those who know that the freedom which the Establishment allows is illusory. People who are arrested for thought crimes are dæmonised by the media, and as a result are regarded as the enemies of the people by the very people whose freedoms the Establishment have removed. This is problematic. The conditioning of the masses is such that a herd mentality exists, with people who stand out and 'rock the boat' being viewed with suspicion and hatred. Fear of not being popular, is enough for many people who can see that there is a concerted effort to destroy individuality and sovereign society, to force them to acquiesce.

In order to halt the construction of the One World State, we need to awaken the people, and do so in a manner which is tailored to the situation which confronts us. We have to break down the programming and to discuss issues of importance which the people have been conditioned to close their minds to - but we must do this without triggering the fear and hatred strategy of the parasitical pre-programming. This requires a disciplined and analytical approach to the problem; an approach which will ultimately result in the mental emancipation of others who will become an unstoppable force which will be victorious in our struggle. We must be the vanguard which will be unstoppable once the 'Hundreth Monkey' is awoken.

The first step to freedom comes with an understanding of the nature of our enslavement. We are not held in bondage by physical chains, but by mental ones. We need to study the various forms of Cognitive Behavioural Therapy, with a focus upon Neuro-Linguistic Programming. We need to make ourselves experts in the understanding of subliminal imprinting and other techniques of mind control.

Recognising the symbolism used by the architects of the One World Order is a part of the process to self-liberation, but only a part. Being able to recognise a Masonic hand gesture, or to see the symbols of secret societies in architecture can lead one to despondency, if that is the only level of awareness one attains. Of a deeper importance is the understanding of the techniques currently in use to keep the people in a state of unquestioning and unknowing servitude.

We are fighting an enemy which is multi-faceted, but guided by a common purpose. Our enemy uses techniques which are complex, but not incomprehensible. Studying the programming techniques is essential if we are to deprogramme ourselves. Appreciating that the enemy is not an immovable force but rather is a paper tiger gives us strength. When we become fully cognisant of the psychological weaponry which is being used against us relentlessly, we will achieve immunity to this level of attack. An analogy could be for a European to fully learn Hebrew or Chinese - the previously meaningless characters once learnt in their entirety within the context of the particular language, will never again pass un-noticed and bereft of understanding. Right now, for the majority of us, the 'characters' themselves are only vaguely evident, but with a concerted effort they will become so plain that their usage will not only fail as a method to enslave us, but will actually become a valuable tool for us to turn against our oppressors.

Fake Resistance 'leaders' such as Alex Jones use slogans such as 'New World Order' to describe the destruction of culture and nationhood. The One World Order is not new, but rather is rooted in history, and is unknown by the uninitiated due to the distortion of knowledge and the deliberate implanting of false ideas into the collective subconscious. The repetition of the slogan New World Order has made the term a point of reference for those who oppose the crushing of identity and the ascent of materialism. The impact upon the untrained mind is the false perception of the machinations of the anti-humans as a product of modern times, which can be beaten by correcting an ideology which is perceived as dysfunctional. In this way the conservative opposition to the One World Order is neutralised by focusing its efforts on reforming the current system.

In the USA, the conservative Resistance pins its hopes on restoring the Constitutional Republic, failing to appreciate that the Republic was but a stepping stone towards the One World State - put in place by the Founding Fathers with inherent flaws which were designed to be utilised at a later date for the purpose of enslaving the people of America. Similarly, in the UK, Monarchists campaign for the return of rule by the Royal Family and the Aristocracy, not noticing that these exact people never relinquished power and are at the forefront of the One World tyranny. The term 'New World Order', is an example of psychological warfare. By creating a rose-tinted view on an earlier stage of the destruction of humanity which is the One World Order, the 'Resistance' is emotionally dedicated to nurturing and defending a photo-shopped memory of the sickness itself.

The One World Order is taking shape because we are fighting the wrong battles. We are fighting the battles they have prepared for us. We need to study their techniques, and to arm ourselves with the weaponry of their making - we need to become masters of psychological warfare. Once our eyes are fully open, we will be able to open the eyes of others. Disengaging from the mind control of the Establishment is a prerequisite for victory, but it is not enough without action to awaken others. The House of Cards will fall once we stop propping it up - but that will require stopping others propping it up too.

Educate yourself in the techniques of the enemy. Neutralise their weapons by making yourself fully conscious of them. Then use this knowledge to awaken others, and to bring their tyranny crashing down. It is only fear which is stopping you - fear which the Establishment have programmed into you. Deprogramme and reprogramme yourself. Eliminate the fear and sense your inner strength. Then take the battle to the enemy, and destroy them.

Around the world, political correctness is replacing common sense. Organisations such as Common Purpose exist in most nations, with the shared goal being to the creation of a single bureaucratic system at the administrative level. This uniform bureaucracy is the instrument for the implementation of Fabianism which seeks to replace freedom of speech with absolute self-censorship, and freedom of thought with no thought whatsoever.

Much has been written about the intrigues of Common Purpose and the horrendous effects of Political Correctness and the Communitarian ideology. There is a belief that those within the system are willing accomplices. In some instances this is true, but for many, the opposite is the case. As someone who works from within the beast, I would like to share my typical daily experience.

My working day begins as does most people's, save only for most people inflicting upon their minds the poison of television. I leave my house and join the herd of indentured slaves who comprise the workforce. Like my fellow drones I am monitored for most of my journey by the sea of cameras atop the traffic lights which impede my progress along the road. In addition, as I enter the legal and financial district (interestingly based in the same area, betraying the truth of who controls the nation), my car is filmed by hundreds of CCTV cameras. This surveillance continues right up to the door of the building I work in. I could add that for many of my colleagues, this surveillance is reinforced by the GPS in their in-car satellite navigation and mobile telephones (or as Americans call them, 'cells').

Upon entering the building I am filmed by the internal monitoring system. The mass of cameras are fitted with microphones, adding a further dimension to the level of intrusion. For the entire day, not only will my every move be filmed, but my every word will be recorded. Like every other member of staff, I have a security door operator which contains my unique identification information. This, alike all the other measures, is ostensibly a device for heightening the level of security afforded the building, in order to protect the sensitive data held on the general public who are engaged with this particular aspect of the State. However, are the public really protected by the monitoring of how many times I visit the kitchen to make a drink, or how often, and for how long I visit the toilet? Every door is fitted with a security lock which is operated by an electronic i.d. recogniser - this is but another surveillance gathering mechanism. Before taking up my post, I have to sign in - further enhancing the level of data as to my activities. This replication of submission to surveillance is a psychological weapon for ensuring that at no time during the day does anyone forget that he or she is being monitored.

Although not a daily occurrence, meetings are a very common feature of the working week. At these, the current policy from Central Government is passed down. This changes weekly (if not more often) and affects the very minutiae of work. This ensures that no-one can become comfortable in the workplace, and that everyone is alert to the fact that no decisions can be made without recourse to higher levels of the bureaucratic chain. Policy reversals are continuous and concern every imaginable aspect of work. This ensures a complete sense of powerlessness, regardless of the position of the worker in the structure.

Meetings invariably incorporate a degree of 'training' which rather than being training to improve the ability to deliver a quality service to the public, tends to be a further spoon-feeding of political correctness. Recent examples of this have been sessions on 'negative words' which cause hurt and offence. Even staff who have no direct contact with the public are forced to endure such tedium. Needless to say, staff are monitored to ensure that forbidden words are not uttered. The negative impact of this upon worker morale is tangible. Such is the intrusive surveillance that aside from the extremists on the staff who embrace such lunacy (mainly because being such types as benefit from it), that open criticism of political correctness is commonplace, albeit qualified so as to not invite disciplinary measures. Doublespeak has mutated within the public sector into a manner for discussing its stupidity without referring to it directly.

Back in the office, the surveillance continues. The computer system is set up so as to allow remote viewing of every computer, in much the same way as the CCTV can be remotely viewed via secure internet connections. This ensures that workers only use the computers for work. This is of course reasonable. However, the monitoring is not restricted to work time, and even though staff are allowed to use the internet before work, or during breaks, the monitoring continues at all times. The result of this is that personal emails are recorded, as are visits to social sites such as Facebook. Up until recently, random checks of internet use were sporadic, making internet usage relatively safe. This has now been replaced by complete recording of all activity. Personally I no longer use the internet at all at work, and in this I am not alone. Resentment to the Big Brother State is growing within the belly of the beast itself.

So what is to be made of this surveillance and attempted political indoctrination? Ironically, the more the State removes power to make decisions, the more it shifts policy so as to remove any sense of solid purpose, the more is encroaches on the privacy of the staff, so the more easy it makes the overthrowal of the politically despotic regime.

There is a myth that Civil Servants and other public sector employees are politically neutral. For practical purposes, with regards to the daily working environment, this myth is for the most part a reality. There are certainly a few agitators who take every opportunity to advance their philosophical positions, but in the main, most of the workers keep their opinions private. The typical public servant is so used to policy changing with no reason given, that whatever is desired by the State is implemented. Therein lies the flexibility of the system, and the weakness of the internationalist mafia who presently preside over the central authority in Bruxelles and its provincial arm in London. I suspect the same can be said in most countries.

I have written repeatedly about how dire our situation is. However, we must not get despondent. The beauty of bureaucracy is that the control freakery from on high is so pervasive that it generates hostility at every level of the chain. An administration which relaxed the controls and allowed for the workers to use common sense in decision making would be welcomed by the public sector as a whole. The hated Communitarian system would collapse overnight once the despots at the top were removed. No public servant (with the exception of the rabid Marxist minority) would be sad to see the ideology of the internationalist criminals overturned. For some it would simply be another change in policy, for many it would be a welcome return to sanity.

The system seems to be a solid immovable force, against which there is no hope. Nothing could be farther from the truth. There is too much despair and fear-mongering amongst the defenders of freedom and decency. We need to take another look at what we are fighting. It appears to be immovable because that is the propaganda that it pushes through its collaborators and stooges (such as Alex Jones for example). Our enemy is only powerful in image. Without our support it is nothing. Take hope and strength in the knowledge that the un-natural situation we are enduring is hated by those who work within the system as much as any other sector of society. We can permanently banish political correctness and internationalism once we accept that the tiger is made of paper.

Take hope. The power of our enemy is an illusion. We have real power. We can, and must, win.