|
|---|
Showing posts with label Party Politics. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Party Politics. Show all posts
Thursday, 16 June 2011
In 1982 the Thatcher regime sent men to die in the Falklands in order to ensure that her hated government was re-elected. Now, nearly 20 years after the Falklands Conflict, those who lost relatives are being further insulted by the Tory depletion of the military, which means that should Argentina again wish to take charge of the Falklands Islands, they will have no problem so doing - and considering what a boost that would be for the politicians in Buenos Aires, it would be surprising if that doesn't happen.The Falklands Conflict of 1982 was sheer political opportunism. The regime in London had been in power for a mere three years, during which they had reneged on every promise made in the 1979 General Election. A promise to halt immigration, for example, turned into an increase in the number of people entering the country. This exacerbated the unemployment situation and led to riots across many English cities. By 1982, public discontent with the regime was such that it seemed inevitable that the government would fall. Faced with the prospect of bowing to the will of the electorate, the London criminals chose another option - they chose war.
The prospect of war came with the invasion of the Falkland Islands by the Argentine Navy. The Islands had been in dispute for sometime and the British government, eager for an opportunity to distract the people from the social ills wracking the UK, had manipulated the Argentine government into invading the Islands in order to create such a diversion. The war was not about defending the Islanders from foreign aggression. Prior to the Thatcher regime's slander of Argentina, the Islands had a very close relationship with Buenos Aires. Stories that the Islanders were in any way endangered by Argentina were pure fantasy.
Once hostilities broke out, the media went into overdrive spreading lies about our European kin in Argentina; dehumanising them with absurd propaganda. During the War, the Argentine ship, the General Belgrano, was sank by the Royal Navy whilst attempting to return to Argentina with injured servicemen. The Establishment media greeted this war crime with applause; notably with the infamous Sun scandal sheet 'Gotcha' headline. The reaction of the British people to the atrocities being committed in their name was to wave flags and celebrate. To date no one has been held to account for this crime. Just as with Bomber Harris, the Butcher of Dresden, the British war criminal responsible for the sinking of the Belgrano were treated as heroes, not murderers.
Now, 19 years on, the people of the Falklands are forgotten. No longer of political value, the Westminster regime is not interested in keeping a Naval force ready to defend them in case of invasion. So what has changed? Absolutely nothing. The Falkland Islanders were pawns in Westminster politics - pawns which are no longer needed. As for the military dead and injured, they were never more than instruments of the political Establishment. If the government cared about the people, the military would be at home defending the borders from the ongoing invasion of illegal immigrants. Instead the military are in North Africa and Asia killing foreigners in their own lands for the benefit of international finance; creating conditions which compel people to migrate from their homelands. Imperialism leads to the displacement of people - and the destruction of the Homeland. It happened to Egypt and to Rome; now it is happening to us.
Politicians lie and people die. Until people wake up to this reality and demand a new system of government based on popular rule and people's congresses, it will remain this way. The solution to mass migration is to create conditions in the home countries which encourage people to stay where they come from. Bombing them and stealing their resources doesn't do that! War benefits corrupt politicians and munitions producers, no one else.
On the plus side, the Falkland Islanders will now have to come to terms with their neighbours. Argentina is a civilised European nation. In the long term, the end of the influence of the depots in London can only be a good thing.
RIP the victims of the Thatcher War: Argentine and British.
Tuesday, 31 May 2011
The above video by Dahlia S. Wasfi graphically shows what the wars against humanity, outrageously and mockingly described as humanitarian wars, are really about. Doubtless the censors at Youtube will swoop on this video - it is already only available to those who sign in and give their identity (possibly to be used at some stage by the Establishment under Nacht und Nebel style political incarceration).
Why is access to this particular video subject to control? Children can readily see videos encouraging them to embrace all manner of perversion and to embrace materialism as the only way of life (in 'pop' videos and children's TV programmes); the 'news' is filled with gruesome imagery of slaughter which should make people sick and angry (but due to being deliberately desensitised provokes little reaction if any); soaps are weapons for social engineering to make people comply to the destruction of society, lest they be seen as out-of-step with what the TV dictates is 'normal' (being 'different' just won't do, ironically); even the weather forecast is filled with Global Warming scare stories to indoctrinate and terrify the populace into supporting lies which will fleece them financially and remove their freedom to live as they see fit. Dr Wasfi must be a heinous individual pushing something really vile if we can see every evil imaginable at leisure, but cannot see her work. Is this the case?
So what has the creator of the video done to cause such offence? She has committed the most unacceptable of all crimes, she has told the truth - a truth which the Establishment does not wish anyone to hear. The 'War on Terror' is a War OF Terror, and the real terrorists are the barbarians who wear the NATO emblem on their uniforms. It is the military of the UK, USA, France, Italy et al who are murdering ordinary people across the globe. Al-Qaeda is a creation of the CIA, which is itself a puppet of British Military Intelligence (MI5/6). The myth of Al-Qaeda being the enemy has been shattered once and for all by the FACT that Al-Qaeda soldiers are right-now fighting alongside NATO forces to extinguish the flame of freedom in Libya.
The wars of aggression being conducted using the military of the West are wars for profit. They are wars of corporate imperialism. In Afghanistan, the prize was Gold and Opium, in Iraq and Libya, Oil. In every war, the construction of permanent military bases to defend multi-national corporations has underlined the true reason for the invasions. The profits of the multi-nationals are not worth a single drop of blood - military or otherwise. The parasites-in-chief who have replanted the Opium fields destroyed by the Taliban don't give a damn about ordinary people anywhere. All they are interested in is ensuring they continue to gain financially from the misery caused by heroin addiction back home. The Establishment are cold-blooded calculating materialists who have no empathy with humanity. The Islamic accusation that the USA-UK-NATO Axis of Evil is the Great Satan is not entirely unjustified. We, the people, are not evil, but those who rule over us certainly are.
Kudos to Dr Wasfi. Doubtless the masses will continue to watch sport, be obsessed with fashion and the latest gadgets, and continue to fund their own serfdom whilst muttering approval for whatever lies the Establishment war machine feed them. The masses will always be like cattle - but this doesn't necessarily have to be a bad thing. It is the intelligent and influential section of the population we need to reach if we are to have any chance of opening the minds of the people to the truth. We need to get busy. Time is against us. Today NATO is after the great Muammar al-Qaddafi and the free people of Libya. Tomorrow they will come for all of us who resist their global gulag. We cannot procrastinate or get bogged down in petty divisions. We need to act now. Knowledge is power - use it.
Henry Kissinger once commented that military men were 'dumb, stupid animals' to be used as pawns for foreign policy. Kissinger may be many things, but a fool he isn't. Military personnel who blindly obey orders, butchering civilians in their own lands deserve the epithet given above. Political Parties which maintain the position that once a war starts, full support must be given to the military, regardless of the justifiability (or lack of) of the war itself, are accomplices to the murder committed by those they support. The only servicemen who deserve our support are those who refuse to obey the criminal orders of their 'superiors'. Mutiny against butchers is not a crime, but a duty. We must encourage our military men to stand up for what is right and disobey en masse. Today we have a military force comprised mainly of Europeans and other Occidentals bombing the peoples of Africa and southwest Asia. Should the time come for the homelands of todays murderers to be attacked, military personnel from the Orient could well be used. The Dumb Stupid Animals who murder civilians abroad today, condemn civilians at home tomorrow.
Dr Wasfi's site with more forbidden information can be found HERE - at least until a puppet ruler such as Barry Soetoro has it removed from Google and other search engines, if not closed completely. We need to disseminate the truth and undermine the despots who wish to crush all our freedoms.
Monday, 30 May 2011
The following was posted: 29th May 2011 07:19 PDT by FINAL CONFLICT. For those outside the UK, the BNP is the largest patriotic party (nationalist/populist) and the EDL the largest street organisation (soccer hooligans mainly). The BNP was originally a pro-British organisation but has descended into an anti-Muslim one. The EDL is solely anti-Muslim with an agenda which can only harm the British people, especially women. Both organisations are rabidly Zionist, kowtowing to Israel in the most embarrassing manner. Despite this Talmudophilia, they are berated as 'far-right extremists', 'neo-Nazis', 'haters' etc by the Establishment media. They are unwittingly (I hope) serving the Establishment agenda. Such is the state of the patriotic movement in the UK. Final Conflict is a part of the International Third Position which grew out of the original National Front when that party fell into neo-imperialism and reactionary conservatism in the 1980s. The BNP is a joke, controlled by profiteers. The EDL is dangerous and must be exposed for the Establishment internationalist trap it is. Kudos to FC for an excellent expose. Original link HERE.
The stories of 911 and 7/7 are unravelling as fast as the JFK, Dr David Kelly and Osama Bin Laden stories.
This is why the "patriot" movements who try to screech "it's all the muzzies," like the BNP and EDL are (whether they like it or not) part of the con. They are a small ingredient in the Neo Con/Zionist/Israel Lobby recipe.
Right: The BNP & EDL prove that Muslims are taking over America.
Their job was to keep the white working class (still a sizable proportion of the British population) bumbling along, blaming the Muslims for all their ills.
- We were dragged into foreign wars. FOCUS ON THE MUSLIMS.
- The banks dragged us to the edge of total ruination. FOCUS ON THE MUSLIMS.
- The politicians filled their pockets as we were taxed to the hilt. FOCUS ON THE MUSLIMS.
The world is falling apart. The very many woes affecting us (including immigration) are the work of the Masonic-Zionist elite, and that same elite are playing the BNP/EDL (and whoever comes along next) so that we as nationalists never pose a risk to their policies.
The Muslims have been here for 40 odd years, give or take. They have been the government/media enemy for the last 20 odd years, give or take.
Do you, nationalist, really think we had no problems before this time? Do you think our people lived in freedom before this time?
Wake up.
The Muslim issue is just a very small part of a much bigger problem, and the elites behind those problems (the oligarchs, the fat cats, the media moguls, the big businessmen, the politicos etc.) are of the same Masonic-Zionist elite; that is why the family, Christianity, nationalism etc. have been under attack for so long.
Nick Griffin still Twitters incessantly about the Muslims. It is boring. It is futile. It is treacherous.
The Masonic-Zionist elite are pulling the strings. Watch the marionettes dance.
Link:
7/7 Ripple Effect VICTORY
Thursday, 21 October 2010
Every email and website to be stored
Every email, phone call and website visit is to be recorded and stored after the Coalition Government revived controversial Big Brother snooping plans
By Tom Whitehead, Home Affairs Editor
Published: 12:40PM BST 20 Oct 2010
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/technology/news/8075563/Every-email-and-website-to-be-stored.html
It will allow security services and the police to spy on the activities of every Briton who uses a phone or the internet.
Moves to make every communications provider store details for at least a year will be unveiled later this year sparking fresh fears over a return of the surveillance state.
The plans were shelved by the Labour Government last December but the Home Office is now ready to revive them.
It comes despite the Coalition Agreement promised to "end the storage of internet and email records without good reason".
Any suggestion of a central "super database" has been ruled out but the plans are expected to involve service providers storing all users details for a set period of time.
That will allow the security and police authorities to track every phone call, email, text message and website visit made by the public if they argue it is needed to tackle crime or terrorism.
The information will include who is contacting whom, when and where and which websites are visited, but not the content of the conversations or messages.
The move was buried in the Government's Strategic Defence and Security Review, which revealed: "We will introduce a programme to preserve the ability of the security, intelligence and law enforcement agencies to obtain communication data and to intercept communications within the appropriate legal framework.
"This programme is required to keep up with changing technology and to maintain capabilities that are vital to the work these agencies do to protect the public.
"Communications data provides evidence in court to secure convictions of those engaged in activities that cause serious harm. It has played a role in every major Security Service counterterrorism operation and in 95 per cent of all serious organised crime investigations.
"We will legislate to put in place the necessary regulations and safeguards to ensure that our response to this technology challenge is compatible with the Government’s approach to information storage and civil liberties."
But Isabella Sankey, director of policy at Liberty, said: "One of the early and welcome promises of the new Government was to ‘end the blanket storage of internet and email records’.
"Any move to amass more of our sensitive data and increase powers for processing would amount to a significant U-turn. The terrifying ambitions of a group of senior Whitehall technocrats must not trump the personal privacy of law abiding Britons.”
Guy Herbert, general secretary of the No2ID campaign group, said: "We should not be surprised that the interests of bureaucratic empires outrank liberty.
"It is disappointing that the new ministers seem to be continuing their predecessors' tradition of credulousness."
.........................................................................................................................................................................
And this from a Government which pledged to roll back the State and end the erosion of freedoms imposed by the previous administration. If we needed any further proof that the Party System is a fraud, this is it. Regardless of the alleged political ideology of the party officially in power, the Establishment continues to direct policy from behind closed doors. The democratic system can be seen as a relay race, with the baton being passed from one runner to the next. The baton remains the same, and the end goal never changes. It is all just for the entertainment and manipulation of the people.
All over England people are bemoaning the replacement of the Labour administration with the Tory-Whigg Coalition. People have forgotten that it was under the last administration that immigration was ratcheted up to the point that no one has any idea of how many illegal immigrants, and hostile aliens are in this country. The people have forgotten that the Banks were given free rein to wreck the economy (and did so), and that the wars in the Middle East and Central Asia were started under that regime.
People who one would hope have the sense to see a pantomime act for what it is, are becoming vocal in protest at the asset stripping and financial persecution of the people we are experiencing. Sadly this valuable and vital reaction is being channelled into support for the previous regime! So long as the Masonically created Party System remains and people fall into the phony Left-Right paradigm, we will be stuck in this mire. The solution to the Party System is not to join it and fight it (in truth become another pawn on the chess board), but to reject it and to establish an existence beyond the Establishments reach.
We must Home School our children, trade with one another with alternative currencies (or barter), and defend ourselves rather than submit to the uninterested tyranny of the Police. politics is a game. the only way to win is to not take part.
As for the surveillance society, we already live in it. the measures above as detailed by the Establishment media, are simply the codification of this surveillance. They want us to be scared and to submit like serfs. We must not! We must study their machinations then live outside their control. Otherwise we will be as flies in a spiders web, desperately struggling to live inside the system with no hope of breaking free.
Sunday, 18 July 2010
We are in the middle of a war. On some levels this war is physical, such as the slaughter in Iraq, Afghanistan, and too many other places. On other levels the war is mental, such as through the stream of mind control and thought manipulation which passes for entertainment, news and advertising. On every level, the over-riding influence is spiritual - we are in a struggle against the forces of Luciferianism. On every front, it is the forces of decency and morality which are in retreat, and the forces of evil and materialism which are advancing. We cannot afford to lose this battle, as to do so would be to lose in this life, and the life to follow.We are losing because our enemies have insight into how we feel and think. They have studied us for generations, much as a scientist studies lab rats. Fighting them using the weapons they have created means playing their game. There can only be one outcome to fighting our enemies using their rules, and that is victory for the hidden forces who are the real enemy. If we are to stand any chance of success, we must first look at ourselves, and abandon all the time worn tactics which have failed us again and again.
"Insanity", said Rudyard Kipling, "is doing the same thing over and over and expecting different results". Repetition of failed tactics to undermine our enslavers is beyond insane, it is tantamount to treason.
Party politics form one of the more obvious strategies for removing our enemies from power. Political Parties which contest elections fail because they are attempting to defeat the shadows cast by the real power. If a genuine party was ever to emerge with an unselfish agenda for the very real freedom of the people, it would be banned and its leaders incarcerated or killed. Should this prove not enough to silence a genuine party, it would be flooded with Establishment agents and brought back into the party game as a safety valve for opposition to the anti-human agenda. The corrupted party would then be used to corral genuine enemies of the hidden power, to more efficiently liquidate them. The NSDAP was one such compromised movement which was used to round up and eliminate opponents to the money power. The Iron Guard of Romania, withstood attempts to infiltrate it and so was destroyed by the compromised NSDAP on behalf of the alleged common enemy. Election-fighting Political Parties are a dead end and should be discarded as should all tools of the Establishment.
There are people who, seeing the futility of playing the party game, insist upon engaging in the 'armed struggle' to overthrow our oppressors. This is just an alternative brand of lunacy to the party farce. One need only look to Ireland for proof of the insanity of this idea. Invariably the proponents of such action fall into one of two categories; either they are Establishment assets, or, they are fantasists with no understanding of reality. These individuals are a gift to the Police State (if not indeed agents of it), as their rantings can be used to ratchet up repressive measures against the population as a whole, and to label as 'terrorists' and 'extremists' anyone who could be tied to these people by direct association or membership of the same or linked organisations. In any event, armed struggle is not an option as the people who pull the strings are so well protected that they are immune from attacks by the people. Any victims of direct action would be innocent civilians or puppets of the Establishment, and thus easily replaced individuals. Likewise buildings can be rebuilt. The armed approach is futile, not to mention immoral and unacceptable by the fact that murder is wrong!
So, if we cannot displace our enemies by voting them out, or blowing them up, what alternatives do we have? Well, for a start we can wake up to the reality that the Government are puppets, so any attempt at taking their positions is pointless - unless the objective is to gain the material benefits of becoming the new puppets, and thus becoming accomplices to the hidden elite. Our only hope is to wake up enough of the thinking portion of the population so as to drive a wedge between the rulers and the masses, and by so doing to dissolve their power by removing any acceptance of their institutions and authority. We do not need to awaken the sheeple, only the people still capable of rational independent thought - the sheeple will more than likely continue living in a trance-like state regardless of the benevolence or sickness of the society around them. Our goal is to awaken the few. The many are, at this stage, an irrelevance.
We need to expose the hidden elite, or at least the hidden agenda. We cannot do this by using the Established media which is barred to us. At present we can use the internet, but with censorship growing daily, it is a matter of time before we lose this medium also. The internet is great for getting information out to people who are looking for it, but not so good for awakening people who are blissfully ignorant of the orchestrated demise of all that is good in the world. We must utilise every tool at our disposal, but most importantly we must not get stuck in armchair warfare - we must take the battle to the people, in the real world.
There is a young lady in Portugal who privately tutors students in language skills. She uses the sessions as an opportunity to discuss important issues, thus not only enhancing the students' vocabularies, but also opening their minds to the reality the Television will not show. This is an excellent use of her time and energies, and even if it does not have immediate results, lays the seeds of awakening, which must surely bear fruit as the hidden reality becomes less easy to conceal.
I was waiting at a set of traffic lights only yesterday when a van pulled up at an adjacent filter lane with a great piece of propaganda painted on it. The van had a European Union flag painted across the centre of the back of it, with a skull and crossbones in the middle. Underneath the flag was a slogan about EU toxic corruption, but what stuck in my mind was the image. How many motorists must have seen the image by now? The combination of the EU flag with the symbol for death is one which provokes thought. Vans are routinely daubed with advertising because the advertisers know this works. This innovative thinking has powerful potential in getting people to think about issues which the Establishment would rather they didn't. If you have a vehicle, why not use it as a mobile propaganda device. If your vehicle is a motorbike, or even a bicycle, you could use the back of your jacket as a display piece.
People are heartily sick of political parties, so material which is not linked to parties is more effective than that which is used to get people into the party shambles. In the area where I live, walls were daubed with the slogan 'Free Gaza' to get people thinking about the crimes of Israel. Doubtless had these slogans been on posters attributed to Hizb ut-Tahrir, they would have provoked hostility to Muslims, and thus nullified any consideration of the suffering of the Palestinians. Whether Hizb were responsible for the graffiti is unknown - which is why it worked so well. When they staged marches carrying their banners, the result was more negative. Parties are at the heart of our problems, and anything which associates one with them should be avoided lest the information be ignored and dismissed as partisan.
The key to our salvation is awakening enough people of a sufficient calibre to threaten the hidden power. We need to awaken people who will refuse to cooperate with the Establishment, and who will encourage others to do likewise. The Establishment exists because we submit to it. We don't have to. Should enough people refuse to accept the authority of our enemies, and to live outside their rules, the Establishment will fail and we will be free. We need people who can think for themselves, people who will not blindly accept the evils of usurious materialism, people who will see the alternatives and put them into practice - taking the people who know and trust them out of the Establishment's grasp. In order to free these people from the unreality they live in and get them to join us in our common struggle, we must communicate with them using every means at our disposal. By using our imaginations to think up new form of propaganda, and keeping out of the party trap, we can win.
We don't have much time. We must ACT now.
Sunday, 25 April 2010
The 6th of May 2010 is the date set for the people of most of the non-continental parts of the European regions which formerly were known as the United Kingdom, to vote for which variety of puppet they wish to lie to them over the next four years. In previous years, a General Election in the United Kingdom would give the population the opportunity to decide which politicians would oversee the extraction of their wealth. However, since the ratification of the Lisbon Treaty, the last vestige of choice has been removed. It matters who is elected to Westminster about as much as who wins the next reality TV contest.
Am I being a bit unfair? Does it really not matter at all who wins the Election? To answer that question simply and clearly - No! It doesn't matter at all to anyone, excepting of course, the individuals who get elected and thereby gain access to a lucrative supply of expenses and a gateway into a lavish corporate lifestyle when they leave Parliament.
Since December, every Nation in the trading bloc known as the European Union, has ceased to exist as a sovereign entity. The position of the United Kingdom in the European Union is comparable to that of Wessex or Mercia in England. The ancient nations which predate England are still very much alive, with local customs and cultures, even with identifiable differences in the spoken language which hark back to the time when they were free, but they are locked inside England. The absorption of the nations of the Heptarchy into England, can be directly compared to that of the UK in the EU insofar as regards shifts of power. Mercia, Wessex, Anglia etc may remain as names which we still identify with, but none of these former nations have any power whatsoever. They are divided internally into counties, and metropolitan units of administration, but as whole entities they are devoid of power - this is exactly what is happening across the European Union.
With regard to the UK, that imperialist entity is thankfully passing away. The demise of the UK should have provided an opportunity for a rebirth of the States of England, Scotland, Wales etc, with a very real possibility of these reborn States taking the form of federations, restoring power to the constituent Nations within. With the ratification of the Lisbon Treaty, that opportunity has been wasted. The structure of the European Union very much mimics that of England. The former Nations are being divided into smaller administrative units with little regard for ethnic and cultural boundaries. It is no exaggeration to compare the Westminster Parliament to a County Council.
The 2010 UK General Election is an expensive farce, which serves as a distraction and as entertainment. One only has to read the ever more fanciful manifesto promises being made by the competing factions of the Establishment, to realise that the election is mere window dressing, and is devoid of substance. It is almost laughable to hear the TV-operated masses debating the merits of each party. They may as well debate the profound differences between Pepsi Cola and Coca Cola!
In less than twenty four hours the voting will be over and the smug politicians will desist from kissing babies for another four years. Whether the puppets in Parliament wear Masonic Blue or Masonic Red, the same sinister cabal will maintain its rule, and for all the use of the word, nothing will 'change'. We may see previously unrepresented parties gaining seats in the cess pool of Westminster, but this will not mark a revolution in the system of government, rather the absorption into the Establishment of parties which had previously operated independently of the ruling power. For parties such as the National Front, the General Election will be a financial disaster. Hard-pressed members will yet again have been fleeced by deluded leaders into giving their money to an unwinnable cause (money which will pass into the hands of the State they purport to oppose).
Competing in the General Election is proof of a lack of understanding of the reality of power, and for those who do understand, proof of a base motive which has more to do with personal aggrandisement than with saving the nation. This has to stop. This shambles of an election must be the last one in which people who genuinely oppose the movement towards a single global state, allow themselves to be sullied by association.
Real power does not reside in Westminster, and it really never has. Real power resides with the people, at the community level. If we are to break away from our slave masters, we must stop giving them credence by competing in games of their choosing. The solution to Internationalism is not the central authority of nation states, but grass roots autonomy. To break the Soviet European Union, we need to stand together as Europeans, and not fall into petty nationalistic rivalries such as French versus German versus Briton. We need to build our own ethnic territories and celebrate our identities as Bavarians, Catalans, Mercians, Lombardis etc. Ours must be a Europe of a thousand flags, with pride in our distinct identities, but pride also in our common European heritage. And, this be confined just to geographical Europe, but to all our people from California to Vladivostok. One would hope for non-Europeans to also look to localism as a solution to internationalism.
Let us put this lunacy of the 2010 Westminster Election behind us, and look to the real battle for the freedom of humanity. The solution to the Single World State is not the Nation States and Empires of the twentieth century, but to a vast number of truly homogeneous tribal nations with a collection of protective indigenous federations. Power comes from the people and must reside with the people. The house of cards is so delicate, that with concerted effort we can - and MUST - realise our inherent strength and remove the support our would be owners take for granted.
Sunday, 28 February 2010
The following comes from issue 43 of the British nationalist electronic newsletter, National Front News (27th February 2010)
"A WHITE AFRICA – NF FOREIGN POLICY
"A WHITE AFRICA – NF FOREIGN POLICY
"In the last issue of National Front News (No.42), we covered some projected aspects for the establishment of a new White Commonwealth of Nations to replace the disastrous EU experiment which is robbing our nation of its sovereignty. We mentioned in that piece about the number of White people born and brought up and still living in Africa and for the most part, of British descent. There are over seven and a half million White folk in Africa. Three per cent of South Africa’s population is White. For the most part, the whole technological infrastructure of ‘The Dark Continent’ has been built and maintained by White Africans. Mugabe is finding out about that to his and his Black population’s cost as he disenfranchise and brutalises the White Rhodesians still living and working in ‘Zimbabwe’. The NF’s proposal vis-à-vis the White Africans is that using economic inducement, we could persuade the various tin pot countries in Black Africa to set aside a large area of the Continent to which White Africans could move too. This WHITE AFRICA would then be offered a place in the NF’s White Commonwealth of Nations. This is a reasonable and economically viable solution to the millions of White Africans and will ensure their safety, livelihood and a future for their children separate from the ever-emerging Black Nations of which they are now a reluctant part of.
"Break down of White Africans at the moment: White African Population by Country (Approximates) - South Africa: 5,265,300 (as of July 2008). Namibia: 124,000 - 160,000.Mozambique: 30,000. Zimbabwe: 23,000. Kenya: 24,000. Angola: 7,000. Zambia: 8,000. Botswana: 7,000. Senegal: 5,000 . Other African nations: 10,000-25,000.
"Let us build this White Africa policy into overall NF Foreign Policy. "
When I opened the email of which this was the main article, I could hardly believe what I was reading. The National Front was formed on the 7th February 1967 when the Racial Preservation Society, the British National Party and the League of Empire Loyalists merged. The above article would have fitted very easily into a publication of the League of Empire Loyalists, which praised the Empire and the occupation of alien lands to benefit the tyrannical Establishment of the Royal family and their Zionist Establishment, but to find it in the most recent publication of the modern National Front was surprising and alarming.
The article exhibits a complete lack of understanding of the reality of power dynamics in the twentyfirst century. Referring to the previous issue, the writer expresses the National Front's desire for 'the establishment of a new White Commonwealth of Nations to replace the disastrous EU experiment which is robbing our nation of its sovereignty.' Since December 2009 British sovereignty has ceased to exist - the territories of the British Isles are regions within the nation known as the European Union. As for taking Britain out of the EU and into a Commonwealth comprised of the white nations of former British Empire (Canada, Australia, New Zealand), the writer obviously hasn't taken into account the fact that Canada is even more under the heel of the Zionist mafia than Britain is. Also, this spokesman of the NF assumes that the people of sovereign nations which were until relatively recently controlled by the internationalist elite in London, would be happy to give up their independence and to once again take orders from the British Establishment. Considering the abuse meted out to the ordinary people of every nation which has been dominated by the Monarchies of Europe and their Zionist bankers, this assumption is in the realm of the bizarre - and also indicative of an unhealthy subservience to a despotic elite which has done nothing but harm to the common man and woman within the British Isles themselves.
The article takes a position which is untenable for a number of reasons. Firstly, there is the idea that because a large number of Europeans live in South Africa, this justifies the presence of a non-African colony on African soil. This belief is a dangerous one as it justifies the existence of alien colonies due to reasons of the number of people in the colony. This could be used to justify the Netherlands being given over to Muslims due to the demographic increase in Muslim births and the decline in the Dutch birthrate - or for that matter, in England, the cities of London and Leicester by this argument should be recognised as non-English due to the ethnic cleansing of the indigenous population. Likewise, the Serbian province of Kosovo, and the neighbouring territories of Bosnia, Herzegovina, and nearby Albania should, using National Front logic, be incorporated into the Islamic sphere with the White Christian indigenous population abandoned to dimmitude and eventual islamification or death. It goes without saying that this ridiculous argument condones the Turkish occupation of Cyprus and the Khazar occupation of Palestine.
National Front members would doubtless argue that non-Europeans have no place in Europe - which is of course true. To then state that Europeans have a right to exclusive control of territories in Africa shows that the National Front has reverted to an imperialistic position which sees non-Whites as inferiors who, (as the article claims), need Whites to tell them how to live. This is pure lunacy. The idea that Black Africans are inferior to White Europeans is one which does not help to protect and advance the beleaguered European people. This dehumanising ideology is divisive and can only cause resistance amongst sections of the White population who have not experienced the full ravages of multi-culturalism at close quarters. Needless to say, within the Black communities, knowledge of such thinking is hardly helpful in finding a mutually beneficial solution to the disastrous multi-cultural society which is detrimental to every culture involved.
The ideology of supremacy comes from a false belief that Blacks must be stupid because Africa is rich with diamonds and gold, but prior to the arrival of Europeans, these commodities were left in the ground, with the people of Africa 'failing' to industrialise their continent. To those who take this position, I would like to ask just what exactly is so wonderful about the destruction of the land and the spiritual debasement of the people which comes as a result of industrialisation and the promotion of materialist individualism? Are we, the ordinary people of lands which have undergone the Industrial Revolution, happier, stronger, healthier or wealthier (a questionable goal in itself) as a result of having the land of our fathers' wrenched from us and given over to international corporations? Have we benefited one iota by being reduced to the position of wage-slaves who must work in soul-destroying tedium in order to have a subsistence existence? Is there anything positive about the urbanisation which comes with industrialisation? The Urbanisation which denies the family the living space to grow one's own food; the Urbanisation which destroys the family and turns individuals into mindless producer-consumers devoid of morality and any sense of community, culture, tradition, place in time and space; the Urbanisation which gives the natural autonomy of the person over to the anti-human State - are we to condemn the peoples of Africa for not rushing to embrace this poison which has led us to the point of absolute extinction as a culture and a people?
The article continues in its imperialist style by proclaiming that even though the White people in Africa are reluctant to find themselves living in nations ruled by Black Africans, they must be encouraged to live there and given financial support to do so. To this end, the writer envisages a situation in which Europeans will either be allowed to exploit the land of Africa with commodities flowing out of Africa to the new British Empire (!), or they will be settled on large reservations (yes reservations akin to those on which the Cherokees of North America live), which will be supported by the tax-payers of Britain and her neo-imperial realm. Forgive me if I find this all somewhat bizarre. Are we to seriously believe that Europeans are to be settled on African land, subsidised by Europeans in the home territories, with financial benefit going to the African leaders which the writer himself refers to as 'tin pot' regimes? This is the stuff of Alice in Wonderland, is it not?
One would hope that the failed and unsupportable policy of imperialism would have been confined to history. Sadly in the rantings of the National Front it is evident that this toxic ideology is alive and kicking. We are on the very brink of a complete collapse of Europe. If not halted now, the accession of Turkey to the European Union is only a matter of time. If this is allowed to happen, Europe will become an Islamic state and the centrepiece of the Khilafah. If Europe falls, it is a case of when, not if, the USA, Canada, Australasia, European South America etc fall. Yet we have the National Front campaigning on a dead issue which is unobtainable and morally reprehensible.
We need to face the grim reality of the situation in Europe. Certainly the European Union is a problem, but it is the political and bureaucratic system which needs dismantling - Britain cannot afford to turn her back on Europe, nor can any other European nation, whether it be Canada, Chile, New Zealand, Norway, Ireland, Russia or wherever. The petty nationalism and imperialism being displayed by the National Front is contrary to the best interests of all the people of Europe, including the British. The only solution to the onward march of internationalism and multi-cultural genocide is for Europeans to come together in solidarity.
With regards to the National Front policy on Europeans living in Africa, what they are proposing is the exact opposite of what needs to be done. The Europeans stranded in Africa must be given the opportunity to return to their ancestral homelands. Unlike the bogus Law of Return which the Khazars use to draw fellow Khazars into the territory of Palestine, a Law of Return for Europeans back to Europe is fully justifiable. Indeed having accepted that the multi-cultural system is harmful to all cultures, the only solution to the problem of incompatible peoples living in the same territory is for these peoples to be returned back to the lands of their origins. Europe belongs to Europeans, the Orient to Orientals, Arabia to Arabs, South Asia to South Asians, Africa to Africans, Palestine to Palestinians, The Caucasus to the Khazars. The situation in the Americas and Australasia is more complicated, but could (with very careful planning) provide a solution to the problem of those who have been created by miscegenation and have mixed identities.
In the European Regions formerly known as Great Britain, the political parties mobilised against internationalism are in disarray. The British National Party has embraced Zionism and the internationalist concept of nationality. People are leaving the BNP in disgust at the betrayal of the central tenet of the preservation of culture and ethnicity. They are being driven into the waiting arms of the imperialist, royalist, loyalist National Front. The National Front denies the right of autonomy to the constituent nations of the British Isles, demanding the Irish, Scots, Welsh, Picts, Manx, Cornish, Anglians, West-Saxons, East-Saxons, Mercians, Jutes, Britons, and the various Nordic peoples (to mention but some) submit the the rule of the 'British' state - the very same state which through no solid identity with the diverse peoples under its despotic rule, created the problem of international materialism in the first place!
The National Front is wrong with its support of Imperialism and control of African land; it is wrong in its support of the Zionist monsters in the Royal Family; it is wrong in its hatred of the Irish, who are fellow Europeans and fellow peoples of the British Isles; it is wrong in its refusal to accept the rights of the various peoples of the Isles to self-determination and cultural autonomy; it is an anachronism fighting battles from the past and failing to fight the battles of the present.
To any members of the BNP reading this who seek refuge in the National Front, I would advise you to think again - you will be leaving one (allegedly) anti-internationalist pressure group to join another. To members of the National Front, I ask that you seriously look at the direction your leaders are pulling you in. Political Parties are irrelevant - they are traps to contain and diffuse resistance against the internationalist agenda. The only way we can reverse the destruction of the European civilisation is by exposing those who are behind the drive to a single anti-human materialistic Global State. We need to think for ourselves and to act by our own initiatives. We don't need a Party Official to tell us how to do this, whilst he takes our money for subscription to an organisation that cannot, and will not change anything. Europe is dying and the NF is speaking of establishing colonies in Africa!
Stop relying on others to save you. Stop expecting someone else to lead you to a better life. Stop playing the Establishment's Party Game. The situation is dire but not unwinnable - We can stop the destruction of all we hold dear, but we must do it ourselves.
Saturday, 16 January 2010
Political Parties which strive to gain power through partaking in the democratic process will only have success if they water down their policies and transform themselves into carbon copies of the Establishment Parties they purport to oppose. Make no mistake about this - the political system will change as a result of the removal of the power of the internationalist mafia who have embedded themselves in the ruling clique. To this end, parties are not worth applying an inordinate amount of energy to. However, they are not without use.Readers who are members of a party/movement, or any organisation/association which aims to influence the public will know that meetings seldom achieve anything of worth. By and large, a meeting will comprise of a series of speakers passing on information to the membership, the passing round of the collection hat to raise funds for the organisation (etc), a paper/literature sale, maybe a raffle/dutch auction, and a rousing speech by a skilled orator to end the meeting on a positive and inspiring note. Then, there may or may not be a social aspect with some members staying after the meeting to talk to people who have become friends as a result of membership. The social aspect is the most valuable of the meeting as it builds bonds amongst those present. What is generally disappointing is that however good the speeches, and however valid the information which is shared, on far too many occasions, that information is either lost in a sea of alcohol at the following social (or even during the meeting), or is bottled up inside the members who guard it in much the same way as members of secret societies such as the illuminised levels of the Freemasons.
Are you an organiser, or a key activist in any structured political/social movement? Does the above paragraph ring true? How frustrating is it that for all the time and work, (not to mention material/financial outlay), which is expended, targets are repeatedly not met. Meetings which are attended (when they don't clash with more 'important' events such as football matches) descend into back-slapping self-congratulatory shindigs are in reality just circuses to entertain the membership, who leave the venue with a surreal belief that by attending the meeting they have made a difference, and have moved one step closer to a change in society. This is a tragedy - in such instances it would be better had the meeting not taken place at all. It shouldn't, and doesn't have to, be this way.
To focus upon political movements, it is unacceptable that members attend meetings and do not share the information which is given to them. Certainly this is not the case with every organisation, but it is for far too many of them. This problem can be overcome by the imposition of expectations which members must meet. For example, the purchase of literature should be mandatory for all members - to this end a new edition of the party paper should be available at each meeting and members should be required to purchase the paper in bulk. If a single copy is priced at 50 pence/cents, then fifteen copies of the paper should sell for 5 pounds/euros/dollars. This allows the member to keep a copy for him/herself and to sell the others to recoup the initial outlay, and either make a small profit or give away some copies for free. Should the member so desire, all copies could be given away - that is down to the individual. When one considers that the cost is equivalent to the price of a couple of beers, is it really an unreasonable requirement? Maybe there are members who cannot afford the expense - this is where comradeship comes into play - those who are financially unable to fund the cost should be subsidised by those who are able.
All aspects of a meeting should be educational and should also be an opportunity to form bonds of friendship and support. These bonds will prove invaluable as times get harder. Of utmost importance is that information other than internal organisational matters is dispersed to the public at large. It could be argued that it is unrealistic to expect members to pay for papers which are created by others. It is. Members should be encouraged to contribute to the paper by submitting articles which they feel should be in the public domain. Not everyone will wish to contribute in this manner, but the option should be available. This will inspire members to do their own research into issues which they are passionate about. Parties should be happy to tap the skills of their members - otherwise they are just as bad as the mainstream and as such are not worthy of joining. This will naturally lead to problems on occasion, but a seasoned organiser should be able to deal with whatever arises. A further benefit is that by opening the writing of the paper to the membership, a sense of community and value can be inculcated - and a wealth of material will be readily available.
To those in leadership positions who object to the idea of members being able to participate in their own parties, I would have to ask exactly how do the leaders see the members? If they see them as cattle to milk for funds, and to do the donkey work, then I would question the motives of such leaders. To the members who would argue that a requirement to purchase literature in bulk and distribute it, is asking too much, I would question their motives for joining a party at all. Their reluctance to make small contributions in order to free their nations and their own families from the tyranny of the internationalist speaks volumes. They are not sincere, and certainly not active in any meaningful sense - they are hobbyists. Our struggle is not a hobby, it is a battle for the very survival of our way of life, our culture, our freedom, from the ever growing centralisation and uniformity of the cultureless and spiritually moribund globalist machine.
To all members of political parties I submit that it is your right to contribute to your party, and it is your duty to ensure that you distribute information which your countrymen would benefit from receiving. The globalist cabal will not be beaten without a massive resistance by the people at large. It is going to take work to overcome our enemies. Whether you are in a party or not, you will have to share information about the nature of the beast we are fighting. If you are not prepared to speak to others and inform them of the dire situation we face, then you may as well turn on your TV and enjoy watching your world become the inhuman creation the Establishment wish to turn it into - and watch your children become degenerate and materialistic automatons. The choice is yours.
Sunday, 13 December 2009
In a previous article I discussed the irrational attacks upon those who strive to do what is best for their nations, and the almost religious devotion afforded to people who, in a sane society, would be classed amongst the deviant elements , and accordingly dealt with. In particular, I wrote about the pervert, Simon Sheppard. I have received requests that I provide evidence to support my assertion that the man is not the type who should be honoured for his service to the cause of freedom. I shall endeavour to do so here, using his own words to highlight exactly what kind of man is being held up as a hero of the Nationalist community.The following quotes come from Sheppard's book, The Tyranny of Ambiguity, the italics are my comments.
(Page 28) "I was still in a virgin state after my circumcision six weeks previously and became conscious of a desire to lose my second virginity in some special manner.....First, two bids were made...in the Nieuwendijk, the long shopping mall which ran parallel to the Damrak. To three young girls about 15 I said "Hello, I'm looking for someone to talk to." They burst into giggles and I asked them what they were laughing at. "Wie! Wie!" (Who! Who!) one shouted... (so begins his 'scientific research' into how a male can get a female - with approaches to three children, of 'about' 15 (14, 13, 12???)
(Page 94) "My last approach of the day was near the Bloemenmarkt (Flower Market). Two girls were walking in the opposite direction. One, the older, was large and unattractive but the other was a definite target. She was a little heavier than I would have preferred, about 14 and soft, with brown hair and a sweet face. I could fall in love with her for sure. I doubled back and sidled up beside her. "Hello" I smiled. Someone walked towards us and I moved aside to let them pass, then rejoined her. "Can I talk to you?" "Y..." "NO" shouted the one on the other side. She took the arm of the younger girl and forcefully led her forward, leaving me standing." Here the delightful Mr Sheppard describes how he attempted to 'chat up' a 14-year old who was young for her age, and how the poor girl had to be rescued by her older friend. Note the creepy method of approach. It makes one wonder if, had the girl agreed to talk, he would have offered her sweeties or invited her to see his puppies! Continuing his retelling of the shameful event, after noting his repeated rejected attempt to get the girl to talk to him, he states (page 95) "I was despondent and depressed, I wanted to leave town or give up completely and become celibate. This was cause for despair. From his own pen he states despair at not being able to have sex with a 14 year old who was young for her age, and most definitely resembled a child more than a young woman - which in any case she was not.
Page 152, note 2 (referring to signals given to indicate a desire for sex, Sheppard writes "the Basic Erroneous Signal is girl-children giving the Open Legs Signal. Females are totally sexual creatures and the emission of sexual signals by non-reproductive females (young and old) confirms this. Here Sheppard steps into Freudian territory claiming prepubescent girls desire sex and indicate it by such obvious sexual displays as sitting with their legs open or sucking their thumbs in place of a desired penis! Freud and Sheppard are wrong. Children are children and it is sick perverts who fantasise about sexual activity with them and justify their perverted lusts by such rubbish as Freudian Psychology and Sheppard's own work which he labels 'Procedural Analysis' - both are attempts to rationalise and justify the unjustifiable.
Page 174, description of approaching a 15-year old, who was "an obvious target for me (Sheppard), young and soft and fresh"
Page 236 "I spoke five or six time to a young dark skinned girl. This happened at first by some kind of accident and then by anticipation, that is anticipating her movements as she progressed down the Kalverstraat. He is describing stalking a 12-year old who he fully intended to have sex with. Thankfully Sheppard is so repugnant that his attempts to bamboozle her failed. Note he tried to seduce the poor girl half a dozen times. So obsessed is he with this little girl that he returns to her on page 266 where he continues "pursuing a twelve year old target wasn't exactly normal but the persistence of my approaches was, I felt, more or less the usual state of affairs in this environment. He is grooming a child for sex in the typical paedophile manner and trying to justify it as a part of his research!
Page 281 and 288 he goes after a 14 year old half negro who he describes as beautiful, page 395 he targets a 15 year old who he describes in detail, especially her breasts and white knickers which obviously worked him into a frenzy of paedophilic masturbation. Page 441 he describes frequenting a bar and targeting 14-16 year olds, page 453 he admits to repeatedly telephoning a 14 year old half Indonesian, adding a taste for half caste to his lust for children.
I would advise anyone who considers Sheppard to be a hero of the Nationalist scene to think again. He is a half-wit who gained notoriety for his extreme website with its humorous only to imbeciles rants against negroes, who he describes as monkeys. His claim to fame is that he has manged to get himself imprisoned for his stupidity and has in the process made any serious attempt to combat the cultural aspects of internationalism more difficult for everyone. the man is a pervert who lusts after children and half-castes. How exactly that fits with defending our people and standing up for the 14 words is beyond me.
I suspect his book will be available online, maybe in pdf form, for anyone to examine. I would recommend that all who wish to examine the man's sickness do so by accessing a copy for free. I have only touched upon some of his confessions of deviancy. There are many more if the reader is prepared to plough through the unscientific and self-obsessed drivel which he would like us to consider academic material. The last thing anyone should do is give this monster financial support. the only support he deserves comes in the form or a rope to support his neck. The likes of Sheppard and Martyn Gilleard have wormed their way into the Nationalist Movement. Why I do not know. What I am certain of is these beasts are enemies of our culture, indeed are enemies of humanity, regardless of nation or ethnicity, and no one, of any political persuasion should give any aid to such scum.
Thursday, 3 December 2009
Eddy Morrison is a personal friend of mine. As all people do we have have arguments, however, he has never given me any reason to believe that he is anything but a committed patriot who sincerely loves his country and wishes to see her freed from the stranglehold her enemies have on her.Through the course of Eddy's political career he has been in high-ranking positions in a number of parties. The consistency of his commitment to the ideal of Official National Socialism have frequently brought him into conflict with Populists who prefer to bend their politics to whatever the prevailing wind dictates. I certainly disagree on a variety of issues, including how we see Adolf Rothschild, sorry Hitler, but I cannot doubt that his intentions are honourable.
It is with dismay that I have to relate news of Eddy being threatened in his own home by 'nationalists' from the British Zionist Party, sorry British National Party. Eddy is currently active with the British National Front (NF) who released the following statement regarding the actions against Eddy:
"West Yorkshire Police were called today after Tommy Williams and Dave Howard turned up at 2.35pm on the Leeds doorstep of National Front Director of Information Eddy Morrison. Williams spoke while Howard stayed in the background filming. (We look forward to seeing if a video appears on Williams' blog.) Eddy was at home with a NF comrade, three other members having left about half an hour ago. Tommy Williams knocked at the door and, when it was answered, said
"Come outside, Eddy, and I'll do you."
"This was mingled with much swearing and more specific threats. Eddy and his comrade have informed the police that they saw either a knife or cosh in Williams' right hand. When Eddy and the other NF member attempted to shut the door, Williams stuck his foot in to prevent this. They only left when the NF member said he would call the police and Williams kicked the door as they departed. As they drove away, the NF members were able to take down the registration number of Howard's car, which has been supplied to the police.
"When the police arrived, they were extremely concerned that such an incident had taken place in an old persons' residential complex and stayed for several hours. They took statements from Eddy and the comrade who was with him at the time, as well as other residents of the complex. They were also shown a threatening email sent by Williams a few days previously (see Eddy's blog), which shows a prior intent to intimidate and harm the recipient. When they were told about the many threats which have appeared on the Covert blog, they asked to see it and requested many printouts which they took away with them. The opinion of the police officers present was that the actions of Williams and Howard warranted, at the very least, a charge of threatening behaviour, and a file will be sent to the Crown Prosecution Service.
"The police were also interested to learn that an elderly female NF member had been threatened and abused over the phone by a man with a South Yorkshire accent and will be speaking to her also. National Front members are greatly angered by today's events and all of us regard an attack on a single member as an attack on the entire party."
How have the Nationalist community reacted to this outrageous behaviour? Unbelievably, there are posts appearing across the internet claiming that Eddy reporting the behaviour of Williams and Howard proves that the man is a Police informer! He is a pensioner who suffers with ill-health! How was he supposed to react to two thugs with weapons threatening him in his own home?
Where is the condemnation of the abuse (on his own doorstep) of a pensioner living in a retirement home? Where is the press release from the BZP, sorry BNP, stating categorically that they refuse to have anything to do with thugs who intimidate pensioners? Where, in fact, is the announcement that Williams and Howard have been expelled from the BNP? To the credit of the BNP, the revolting site (Covert Undercover Nuisance Tactics (oh how amusing)) has been shut down - but to their shame it was used to intimidate and abuse activists within the Nationalist sphere, for years.
The childish duo who ran the thankfully defunct Covert site acted on behalf of the leadership of the BNP in the role of attack dogs, being used to threaten and abuse anyone who the Party objects to - they are of course, expendable. I wonder if Nick Gri££in authorised the attack on Eddy Morrison, or if the moronic pair concocted this act of stupidity all by themselves whilst over-indulging in too much of the non-liquid variety of coke?
Due to the key witness in the incident against Eddy being a frail 93-year old lady, Eddy has refused to press charges against the men (anatomically speaking) who saw fit to bring trouble to a quiet residential home for pensioners.
In contrast to the vile treatment meted out to the likes of Eddy Morrison we have the undeserving hero-worship afforded to people such as Simon Sheppard and Stephen Whittle.
Simon Sheppard and Stephen Whittle were convicted of racial hatred for the publication of material which denies the use of gas chambers to kill Jews in the Second World War. A little background to this case shows the lunacy of the 'Heretical Two'. Sheppard and Whittle had written a range of articles which could not have been more provocative had they been designed to break the laws in existence in politically correct Britain. Amongst the articles, were discussions of the racial character of Africans - featuring images of monkeys. Not even Covert tactics was that extreme. The website, http://www.heretical.com/, was a gift to those who see themselves as custodians of acceptable thought.
Convicted in England for the offence of publishing racially inflammatory material via the internet, Sheppard and Whittle fled to Los Angeles to claim political asylum. Acting in a manner which should raise questions as to their sanity, the two men accused of 'anti-Semitic' offences fled Britain to seek asylum in the USA. If anything, the USA is even more in the grip of internationalism than is Great Britain. Claiming asylum in the USA showed a complete lack of intelligence. Had the pair sought refuge in Iran, they may have fared better. Their strategy was akin to Jerry the cartoon mouse seeking refuge from Tom in a cattery!
The Heretical website has been operating for several years. So why should the two Englishmen suddenly come under scrutiny by the Law? Bizarrely, somebody put a copy of a the illustrated magazine ‘Tales of the Holohoax’ through the door of Blackpool Reform Synagogue. Unsurprisingly, the magazine was handed to the Police who, with uncharacteristic efficiency, managed to identify the PO Box address as that of Simon Sheppard. They then raided his address in a manner which would have been more appropriate to a raid on a suspected serial killer than a publisher of a comic, and found on his computer articles entitled “Dumb Niggers, Gloating Jews” and “Make Niggers History”. For writing and publishing these juvenile articles, the Heretical Two became heroes in the eyes of those who get pleasure from infantile and inflammatory cartoons. Morrison, on the other hand, for focusing on the Zionist leadership, and not poking fun at ordinary Jews who are as much victims of Globalism as everyone else, has received threats at his own home. Something is very wrong in Nationalism in England.
To return to the heroes of the football-watching, yobbos who are courted by those who see mass membership of parties as a key goal for saving the nation, during their court case, the Crown Prosecution Service lawyer, Mari Reid (of the Counter Terrorism Division) stated that:
"(Tales of the Holohoax) went much further than simply denying the Holocaust, which is not in itself an offence in this country. The whole subject was treated in a way that was insulting and abusive and as a subject for humour...Another example was a leaflet called ‘Ohdruff, Auschwitz Holiday Resort’, where the general theme was that Auschwitz was in fact a holiday camp provided by the Nazi regime and to which Jews from all over Europe came to enjoy a free holiday...People are entitled to hold racist and extreme opinions which others may find unpleasant and obnoxious. What they are not entitled to do is to publish or distribute those opinions to the public in a threatening, abusive or insulting manner, either intending to stir up racial hatred or in circumstances where it is likely racial hatred will be stirred up."
Bassetlaw MP John Mann, chairman of the All-Party Parliamentary Group against Anti-Semitism (ie the Witch finder general of the Zionist Committee for the Suppression of Free Speech), remarked:
“The conviction of Simon Sheppard and Stephen Whittle is proof that if you write, disseminate and publish anti-Semitic racist propaganda in the UK, or on the internet from here in the UK, the police will come after you and the courts will convict. This case sets an excellent precedent — anti-Semitic hate is not welcome here in the UK."
To translate that into English, what was achieved by the Heretical Two was to give to the Zionist establishment a golden opportunity to further clamp down on freedom of speech. Skipping bail and fleeing to the USA was sheer idiocy, and an action which will hamper justice for all in future, as the State will now be able to cite a concrete example of alleged nationalists trying to evade justice.
I have never met Stephen Whittle so I feel unable to comment on the man, other than to say he showed extreme bad judgement in associating with Simon Sheppard. Simon Sheppard on the other hand, is a man I have spoken with at length. I also bought his bizarre and pointless cd (Musigeny), and his book, Tyranny of Ambiguity.
I found Sheppard to be a disturbed individual and conversation with him was uncomfortable. I discovered just why my neck hairs stood on end in his presence when I read his book from cover to cover. Sheppard tries to pass his book off as a work of science. It is nothing of the sort. Sheppard uses his book to brag about his sexual antics with children in the Netherlands. Thankfully his predatory approaches are generally rejected by his would be victims. The man is a paedophile who is so creepy that he scares the children in question - Thank heaven!
It is a real shame that Nationalists have supported the 'Heretical Two'. Comparing Auschwitz to Butlins is the sort of lunacy which the Zionist elite love, as it makes those who repeat it appear mentally retarded. It has the damaging effect of linking real serious revisionist research with stupidity. If the likes of Sheppard and Whittle think this is the way to expose the Holyhoax propaganda, they are very very wrong. Those who titter with delight at such antics are laughing at the foolish works which the Establishment use to justify repression.
The conviction of Whittle and Sheppard gives the establishment ammunition to use against genuine upholders of free speech and truth seeking. Whilst I find the conviction of anyone for thought crimes abhorrent, I cannot be anything but pleased that the sick pervert Sheppard is off the streets. He is finally somewhere where he cannot injure any more children. He is in a place where nonces are not well liked, and where he may well receive some real justice for his pederasty.
When one looks at the treatment of Simon Sheppard and Eddy Morrison, one cannot but wonder at the mentality of the rank and file of the Nationalist movement. On the one hand we have a man who has fought against his daemons and has helped to educate generations of people to the evils of the Zionist cabal who form a significant part of the leadership of the internationalist network. On the other we have a paedophile who is so proud of his perversion he has written a book on it. Likewise, Eddy Morrison was responsible for the White Nationalist Party which built a non-Sectarian movement in the North of Ireland in which Catholics and Protestants marched shoulder to shoulder against the common foe. The only 'achievement' of Sheppard was to help tighten up the repressive laws against free thought and speech, and to get himself and his hapless dupe, Whittle, locked up.
Unbelievably, Morrison is portrayed as an enemy of the nation, and Sheppard is treated as a shining example of how we should all behave. It is no wonder that those from outside the Nationalist community who are our natural allies in the struggle against internationalism, refuse to have anything to do with the Nationalist movement. The attitude of the foot soldiers which the leadership have carefully crafted is repugnant to anyone with any sense.
If we are to have any hope of saving our people, our culture and our lands, then we must accept that the petty divisions, the emphasis on party above all else, and the resulting back-biting and hostility, have caused an immeasurable amount of ill to our nation. The Party System has pitted activist against activist in a fratricidal war, whilst the real enemy has gained victory upon victory at our expense. It has created an image of Nationalist as 'thickos' who enjoy violence for the sake of it, and are politically illiterate. It has reinforced the left-right division which has ensured that genuine opponents of internationalism are kept from uniting to halt the progress of the real enemy.
Scum like Sheppard should be thrown to hungry dogs to be torn apart for their crimes against children. they most certainly should not be revered for their ability to get themselves (and others) locked up! I disagree with Eddy on the issue of Parties, but I respect him for his genuine love of his country and his determination to do something to halt its demise. Nationalists need to stop being sheeple, and start thinking for themselves. They need to stop following orders and fight the true enemy - internationalism. This means ditching parties, and reaching out to everyone in our society, regardless of politics. If we can do this we will beat the Zionist machine. If we continue to fight amongst ourselves, and let the Zionist mafia advance unhindered, then we deserve to lose our lands. The choice is stark. Think or die.
Monday, 23 November 2009
I do not normally respond to the accusations of ne'er do wells, axe-grinders and others who enjoy spreading dis-info and making pointless and unworthy accusations. However, since I have changed tactics and begun posting blog articles to a wide variety of fora and social networks, I have become the focus of an orchestrated attack. Rather than answer the accusations individually - which is a massive waste of valuable time and effort, I shall answer the accusations here, and link my response as applicable. The attacks I have received come in two main strands. Firstly, insinuations about how I earn a living, and secondly outright accusations that I am an advocate of the dissolution of the Church of England, which, it is maintained, is a bad thing. Thirdly, I am accused of anti-Semitism. I will answer these accusations in turn.
Firstly, there is the accusation that what I do for a living impacts upon what I write. Well, obviously, it does. It seems to me that a lot of the people who complain that I do work, are themselves shiftless, and happy to be doley scroungers. These people get their information from the tabloids, and the mainstream media. Other than 'news' from Establishment sources, those who rail against me tend to be Party activists, who receive politically-biased stories from the parties to which they belong. They take the propaganda they absorb at face value and do not question its validity. If the Party says that all the ills of the world are caused by people who eat bread, these activists will take it upon themselves to attack bakeries - whilst munching on a sandwich no doubt. Parties exist to spread propaganda, and if that happens to contain a reasonable degree of truth, then that is a happy coincidence. By using sources which are forbidden by the Party hierarchy, I am seen as a part of the enemy. In truth, by refusing to access all sources, Party activists are denying themselves the ability to see beyond the contrived version of reality the Establishment and the party create for them. They are going into the battle blindfolded - and hate anyone who refuses to cover his or her eyes and dares to search for the truth.
Firstly, there is the accusation that what I do for a living impacts upon what I write. Well, obviously, it does. It seems to me that a lot of the people who complain that I do work, are themselves shiftless, and happy to be doley scroungers. These people get their information from the tabloids, and the mainstream media. Other than 'news' from Establishment sources, those who rail against me tend to be Party activists, who receive politically-biased stories from the parties to which they belong. They take the propaganda they absorb at face value and do not question its validity. If the Party says that all the ills of the world are caused by people who eat bread, these activists will take it upon themselves to attack bakeries - whilst munching on a sandwich no doubt. Parties exist to spread propaganda, and if that happens to contain a reasonable degree of truth, then that is a happy coincidence. By using sources which are forbidden by the Party hierarchy, I am seen as a part of the enemy. In truth, by refusing to access all sources, Party activists are denying themselves the ability to see beyond the contrived version of reality the Establishment and the party create for them. They are going into the battle blindfolded - and hate anyone who refuses to cover his or her eyes and dares to search for the truth.
There does seem to be a bizarre train of thought which maintains that people who work can't be trusted. People who undertake menial tasks are seen as a threat, and God forbid anyone tries to climb out of the trap of minimum wage slavery and secure a position where he or she can provide for his or her family! It needs to be understood that by working in jobs which are not run-of-the-mill, people gain access to information which unemployed layabouts and unskilled wage-slaves cannot. I am fortunate in that my job is very interesting, and it does allow me to examine the workings of the State. To a limited degree I am privy to information which the public at large is not - and I use this first hand knowledge against the Establishment itself. We're not going to change a thing by shouting against the system from the outside - we need to get to its very core to do that. I make no apology for working, and for working my way into the beast. Only with knowledge of what 'they' are really doing, can 'they' be stopped
If all those who opposed the system were to get inside it, then it could be dismantled overnight. Attacking it from a position of ignorance, where the only information you have is what they want you to have, is to play a part in their pantomime - and to actively participate in furthering their agenda. This is beyond pointless - it helps reinforce the Establishment. If we are to defeat this monster, we have to know what we are fighting, and how best to go about it. Withdrawing our support by refusing to participate in their games is a key step. The system exists because people prop it up. Removing that prop is an essential part of the struggle.
If all those who opposed the system were to get inside it, then it could be dismantled overnight. Attacking it from a position of ignorance, where the only information you have is what they want you to have, is to play a part in their pantomime - and to actively participate in furthering their agenda. This is beyond pointless - it helps reinforce the Establishment. If we are to defeat this monster, we have to know what we are fighting, and how best to go about it. Withdrawing our support by refusing to participate in their games is a key step. The system exists because people prop it up. Removing that prop is an essential part of the struggle.
The most repugnant aspect of the work-related attack upon me is the insinuation that I work for the Security Services, as some sort of 'double agent' - this is sheer lunacy! I am an individual who is aware of what is going on in the world around me, and can see that the traditional methods of opposition are controlled by the very enemy they purport to oppose. Those who cling to the Party System feel threatened by those who have escaped it and can see it for the farce that it always has been and always will be. I have noticed that it is common practice to refer to people who do not fit into the ideological boxes which have been constructed to keep the opposition in line, as State assets, informers, infiltrators etc. certainly such people do exist, and a careful eye must be kept out for them. But attacking anyone who doesn't toe the Party-line is sheer idiocy. Working with people who ideologically (and even personally) hate one another makes sense if the end result is positive for the restoration of freedom. The Establishment has constructed a web to keep us at each others throats. We must stop this childish behaviour and form alliances issue by issue to dismantle our common enemy. Thinking and acting as an individual is dangerous to those who make a living from the Party system, and those cannot see the reality beyond it. It doesn't make one a State plant - the notion is ludicrous and shows a lack of imagination and a degree of paranoia in the accuser.
As to the second accusation - that I oppose the Church of England. in a single word - Yes! I have written in detail about how until the Judaic takeover of Britain facilitated by the Royals, England was the staunchest Catholic nation of them all. Those who defend Judaeo-protestantism are pawns for the Establishment, who are blinded by an irrational hatred which doesn't stand up to scrutiny. Catholicism in its pure form is the strongest defence against Talmudism that Christians have. Ironically, after that there is really only Islam. England would be better off if it converted to Islam than it is being a tool of Protestantism, aka, Pharaseeism. And, I make no apology for that statement either.
As to the second accusation - that I oppose the Church of England. in a single word - Yes! I have written in detail about how until the Judaic takeover of Britain facilitated by the Royals, England was the staunchest Catholic nation of them all. Those who defend Judaeo-protestantism are pawns for the Establishment, who are blinded by an irrational hatred which doesn't stand up to scrutiny. Catholicism in its pure form is the strongest defence against Talmudism that Christians have. Ironically, after that there is really only Islam. England would be better off if it converted to Islam than it is being a tool of Protestantism, aka, Pharaseeism. And, I make no apology for that statement either.
Of the religions of Christianity, Islam and (Talmudic) Judaism, the oldest is Christianity. When the Jews broke the covenant by killing Christ, they established a new religion. The Talmud is the Holy book of the Judaic religion and negates everything Christianity stands for. Christianity and Judaism are as different as black is to white. Islam is interesting insofar as it attempts to synthesise elements of pre-Talmudic Judaism with Christianity, but rejects the divinity of Christ. Islam and Christianity differ in that for Muslims Jesus is a Prophet, who was followed by the last Prophet, Mohamed. For Christians, Jesus is the incarnation of God in human form, and His incarnation is the final stage of the development of the faith - Mohamed is not a part of the equation and is in fact an impostor. This is the great division. Both Christians and Muslims reject the Talmud, which is the work of Satan. This is why Judaeo-Christianity is such an abomination.
My objection to the Church of England rests entirely on its negation of Christianity. Anglicanism behaves very much like Talmudic Judaism. Its officials have argued over Biblical text to the point that they have reversed dogma. The Decalogue is infallible, yet only Catholics obey all Ten Commandments. The Church of England makes a virtue out of sin - it approves of abortion (Murder), divorce (Adultery/Dishonouring family), materialism (Covetousness/Theft) etc. It is the very foundation of the Capitalism which has destroyed the Spiritual unity of Europe, and as such is indefensible.
The third accusation is as ridiculous as the others, but needs to be addressed due to the serious legal implications. I state categorically and unequivocally here and now that I am not, never have been, never will be, and do not condone anyone who is, an anti-Semite.
The third accusation is as ridiculous as the others, but needs to be addressed due to the serious legal implications. I state categorically and unequivocally here and now that I am not, never have been, never will be, and do not condone anyone who is, an anti-Semite.
I am opposed to Internationalism in any form which oppresses ordinary people. In its present incarnation the most inhumane form of Internationalism is Zionism. Zionism is an Imperialistic philosophy which has successfully tied itself to an entire people and to a religion. The idea that Zionism equates to Jewishness is an evil and sickening lie. (See http://endwhiteguilt.blogspot.com for examples of Zionist Lies). Zionism is a philosophy. Its adherents come from a variety of faiths and races, which they use to hide their real core unifying faith which is Sabatteanism (Satanism). This spiritual poison has polluted all religions, of which Judaism is but one victim. It has very much become an integral part of the British Establishment and its Church, which is an important reason for exposing Royal Family, the diseased faith of Anglicanism and defending its opponent, Traditional (Pre-Vatican II) Catholicism. Indeed opposition to Zionism is in reality defence of all faiths which reject Satanism.
Racially, many of the key players (such as the Rothschilds) are Ashkenazi - many but not all. Opposition to Zionism does not mean opposition to the Ashkenazim as a people. The shrieking of anti-Semitism at those who discuss the Ashkenazi origins of the Rothschilds and theri partners-in-crime, the British Monarchy, comes from a blurring of the classification of who is racially a Jew. The original Jews of the Old Testament were Semites. The Semites who still practice the Jewish faith are known as the Sephardim. The Ashkenazim, in contrast, are the descendants of the Khazars from Central Asia, who converted en masse at the command of their Monarchy. Claiming the Ashkenazim are Jewish by race is like claiming that all Canadians who practice Islam are Arabs due to Islam originating in Arabia. The Sephardim are routinely persecuted by the Ashkenazi government of Israel. The Palestinians whose land the Rothschilds stole and misnamed Israel practice Sabatteanism behind the mask of Judaism, and are racially Caucasian. They are simply not Jews in faith or by race! The true anti-Semites are the rulers of Israel. If anything, those of us who expose Zionism should be classed as philo-Semites, as we favour a freedom for Palestine and the restoration of Torah Judaism with the eradication of Sabattean Talmudism.
Of interest to British and kindred people, there is as wealth of research which points to the probability of the original Israelites (who were the people of the Old Testament) leaving the region and relocating in Western Europe, especially the British Isles. If this is so, then it is highly likely that a significant proportion of modern Britons are descended from the Abrahamics, and are, at least in part, Semites. (See http://thy-weapon-of-war.blogspot.com/) This further weakens the label of anti-Semitism as that would in part be an attack on my own people. Much to the horror of the Judaeo-Protestants, and Royalist, I am an ardent defender of the true character of my people. This is why those who have swallowed the Establishment propaganda attack me on these grounds. If they would only think for themselves and not allow the Freemasonic Orange Odour, the Satanic Church of England, and the blood lust of Bnai Brit-ish materialist-Zionist-Imperialism, to dictate their thoughts, they would realise they are fighting for their own destruction, and that people such as myself are trying to defend them, even for all the animosity this brings.
I have wasted a lot of time and energy arguing these points with people who refuse to abandon their idols. This article will serve as an answer to those who wish to defame me. we don't have the luxury of time to bicker amongst ourselves. Hopefully those who worship the Monarchy and Anglicanism, and argue that we must defend Israel at all costs, will realise they are worshipping their greatest enemies - before it is too late.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
