Beullogeo's

In the Battle Between Facebook and MySpace, A Digital 'White Flight' | The New York Observer - Berkeley grad student examines online social networks and sees metaphorical "White Flight", which is something bad people do, because integration is what every good person should want.

ADL Special Reports: Rage Grows in America: Anti-Government Conspiracies - The Influence of the Mainstream Media - organized jewry can't stomach even buffoonish deracinated zionist Whites like Glenn Beck. They don't like the philo-semitic Oath Keepers either. It's enraging.

Bashing Palin and the horse she rides in on. Too many Whites scares Chris Matthews - "I think there is a tribal aspect to this thing, in other words, White vs. other people."

Semitic tribal aspects at Princeton. The Death of the Grown-Up | Diana West - "This is how it works: Defy Islamic supremacism and be demonized as a supremacist." Substitute "jewish" for "islamic" and you get... Choosing the chosen people - The Daily Princetonian - a student body that's 13% jewish isn't good enough, it should be 25% jewish like Harvard, Brown, Columbia and Penn. Commenters clash.

A cartoon croons, Not My Waterpark. Tragic comedy, not at all funny.

Jewish "social critic" James Howard Kunstler has specialized in ridiculing suburbia while paying relatively little attention to the non-White immigration, non-White sociopathy, and forced integration motivating Whites to flock there. The disproportionately jewish race-hustlers, developers, and financiers enriching themselves in the process also get a pass. Kunstler's made a living hyping a variety of threats, like Y2K and depleted uranium, and warning most recently that "peak oil" will cause a "long emergency". The effect, if not intent, has been to direct attention away from the more immediate and more substantial problems for more Americans, especially White Americans - the displacement and dispossession caused by genocidal levels of immigration and systemic financial fraud, each fueling the other.

Lately Kunstler has been keeping a nervous eye on a particular facet of the fraud. In Thinking the Unthinkable he writes:

How bad is the situation 'out there' really? In my view, things are veering toward such extreme desperation that the US government might fall under the sway, by extra-electoral means, of an ambitious military officer, or a group of such, sometime in the near future. I'm not promoting a coup d'etat, you understand, but I am raising it as a realistic possibility as elected officials prove utterly unwilling to cope with a mounting crisis of capital and resources. The 'corn-pone Hitler' scenario is still another possibility - Glen Beck and Sarah Palin vying for the hearts and minds of the morons who want 'to keep gubmint out of Medicare!' - but I suspect that there is a growing cadre of concerned officers around the Pentagon who will not brook that fucking nonsense for a Crystal City minute and, what's more, would be very impatient to begin correcting the many fiascos currently blowing the nation apart from within. Remember, today's US military elite is battle-hardened after eight years of war in Asia. No doubt they love their country, as Julius Caesar and Napoleon Bonaparte loved theirs. It may pain them to stand by and watch it dissolve like a castle made of sugar in a winter gale.

I do believe it might pain Kunstler to watch israel dissolve. It certainly doesn't pain him to watch and snark at "the morons" while it happens to America. Does he think what Goldman Sachs and friends have been doing is unethical, unfair, unjust, immoral, illegal, indefensible, or just plain slimy? Maybe. But for sure he's concerned how the rubes will react when they find out. He's afraid it might be bad for jews. And he thinks that's unthinkable.

This isn't the first time Kunstler has expressed such fears. Hunter Wallace (formerly Prozium) wrote about Kunstler in Cornpone Nazism toward the end of July, linking to a Kunstler essay titled Evil Syndicated. I'll excerpt a few bits to illustrate how Kunstler recognizes Goldman is creating a problem, but that the real problem is the potential backlash.

By now, everyone in that fraction of the world that pays attention to something other than American Idol and their platter of TGI Friday's loaded potato skins knows that Goldman Sachs has been caught at another racket in the stock market: front-running trades. What a clever gambit, done with the help of the markets themselves - the Nasdaq in particular - in which information on trades is held back a fraction of a second from public view, while the data is shoveled to the computers of privileged subscribers who can execute zillions of programmed micro-trades before the rest of the herd makes a move. This allows them to vacuum up hundreds of millions of dollars by doing absolutely nothing of value.

Don't mistake Kunstler's accurate description here for disapproval. If anything he sees it as a "clever" way to shear "the herd".

In any sensible society - i.e. a society with an instinct for self-preservation - it would be against the law and the people doing it would be sent to prison.

Maybe the larger question is: since when did we become a society lacking the instinct for self-preservation - that is, a society bent on suicide?

Yes, a sensible society would have stopped Madoff and Hasan too. Whites have an instinct for self-preservation. We express it all the time, even though doing so has long been pathologized and is becoming increasingly criminalized. Since when? It's been getting worse ever since jewish emancipation. The proper word for what's happening, by the way, is genocide, not suicide. It's done over our objections. Jews like Kunstler aid and abet the crime by hyping symptoms rather than causes, and misdirecting blame. They see "anti-semitism" everywhere because they're not suicidal.

I think the larger question for Kunstler is: what's best for jews? The larger question for me is: when will Whites take note of this jewish obsession with themselves and their own interests? And when will we see through the dissembling of jewish "social critics" who ridicule and pathologize everything we do to resist what they misrepresent as "suicide"?

As we turn the corner toward autumn, President Obama looks increasingly like a dupe, a tool, or a co-conspirator of Goldman Sachs.

What bothers me is that, sooner or later, the conduct of Goldman Sachs will lead the growing ranks of the unemployed, foreclosed, disentitled, and hopeless into the hands of a savage right wing seeking mindless vengeance, for instance, against "the Jews," (as represented by Goldman Sachs), or brown-skinned people (as embodied by a vilified president).

"It's that brown-skinned guy's fault! Blame him!"

What bothers me is that Kunstler is saying that blaming the group who is responsible is "mindless", because he's acutely mindful that it might be bad for "the jews" and "brown-skinned people". Note however that even as Kunstler does this he feels perfectly free casting aspersions on Whites (as represented by "the savage right wing"), and white-skinned people (as embodied by the "evil syndicated"/"cornpone nazis"). What we have here is a conflict of group interests. Rather than addressing it honestly Kunstler tries to obscure and caricaturize it, advising those who already have their hands on "the growing ranks of the unemployed, foreclosed, disentitled, and hopeless" how to best manipulate them.

Readers of this blog know I'm allergic to conspiracy theories. But surveying the scene out there, it is hard to not conclude that Goldman Sachs has become the "front-runner" of a criminal syndicate defrauding US taxpayers.

Kunstler knows it's hard because he's tried. Now he's trying something more familiar and easier: scapegoating Whites.

In the meantime, the US economy gives the illusion of recovery - but to what? Back to a "consumer" credit card shopping orgy? Another house-buying fiesta?

There you go. One last kick in the nuts for the evil morons. Pay no mind to the hedge fund managers who might be called to account for ripping off the evil morons, if only in Kunstler's nightmares.

Kunstler's not the only "social critic" who's thinks it's important to suppress/redirect the backlash.

Oy! Noam Chomsky Compares Right-Wing Media To “Nazis”:

The memory that comes to my mind — I don’t want to press the analogy too hard, but I think it’s worth thinking about — is late Weimar Germany. There were people with real grievances, and the Nazis gave them an answer. ‘It’s the fault of the Jews and the Bolsheviks and we’ve got to protect ourselves from them, and that will take care of them.’ And you know what happened…

[...]Germany in the 1920s was at the peak of Western civilization. A decade later, it was at the pits of human history.

Chomsky's characterization of those two decades is from a jewish point of view, which is likely the opposite of how a contemporary native German would have described them.

Unless an answer can be given to these people, unless they can be led to understand what’s really happening to them, we could be in for trouble.

"We" could be in for trouble? Me and mine are already in trouble. We are ruled by a corrupt and illegitimate regime whose highest priority is to drown us in "people of color", each and every one of which is afforded special rights over Whites. To even question this is considered a crime. Why should we care about the trouble the fraudsters and the "social critics" spinning excuses for them might suffer? They don't care about our troubles.

The proof of the imminence of the Global State is all around for everyone to see. It is testament to the power of those who control the media that through their mendacious technology they are able to at once announce their agenda, and at the same time convince people that there is no agenda, and that only lunatic 'conspiracy theorists' would believe there is one.

The influence of the media can be experienced in everyday conversation; such as the statements "we won the game/war/election" spoken by people who may be spectators of the media show, but not direct participants. Many people who have seen through the lie of democracy and know that neither the Party of Government nor the Party of Opposition can be trusted, still believe that change can come through elections! They see that Parliamentary Democracy is a sham, but are so conditioned that they cannot grasp that it isn't a simple case of the main parties being corrupt, but rather it is a fact that the system itself is so constructed as to corrupt everyone who participates in any effective manner. How so? By making effective participation possible only for those who have been compromised and accepted the geld of the Zionist mafia.

In recent times Nationalists across Europe have won many seats in the European Parliament. At the same time, the Lisbon Treaty has passed and the Copenhagen Treaty which will seal the fate of all of us will be in force by 2010 (weeks away). The Nationalists who have done well have included parties such as the British National Party which has become avowedly Zionist - making British insofar as it supports the Establishment, and Nationalist in no way at all. The UK Independence Party is likewise controlled by the Internationalist Zionist Faction Two. Parties which genuinely oppose European Union, and World Union have failed to achieve any relevant representation in Britain, if not in all Europe. The Great White Hope Vaclav Klaus of the Czech Republic has likewise proven himself a tool of the elite by allowing all opposition focus on himself, preventing a media-hypnotised population from acting for themselves until too late - when he simply 'gave up' the fight at precisely the moment his masters willed.

There are people who are awake to the futility of the party system who seek alternative means to halt the march to the Global Gulag. The Establishment has an answer to such people - just as it neatly fits people into nonsensical divisions of left and right, then uses the people who accept these labels to attack each other, it uses the same people to attack those who won't take any labels. The left-right division is a Masonic creation. It keeps natural allies apart on superficial grounds. People who won't play the game are a bigger threat to the Establishment than those who take their places like good little pawns in the grand chess game.

In the British Isles we have many political movements. Those who take the Masonic label of being 'left-wing' attack anyone who takes the label 'right-wing' - sometimes verbally, sometimes physically. The same applies in the other direction. The Establishment create these divisions in order to prevent a viable opposition forming. Globalism reduces everyone to the position of materialistic slaves, regardless of nationality, race, religion, sex, or whatever. the common enemy is Globalism, and its drive to turn every town in every country into a faceless characterless, cultural vacuum. They are succeeding because people who oppose this spend more time fighting one another than fighting the Global menace.

An example of the futility of the Party game is the meandering of activists from one Party to another. In the Nationalist arena, we are witnessing the BNP becoming ever more internationalist and Zionist, with the members who oppose this moving to other parties, such as the National Front. This is really a pointless exercise. With the ratification of the Lisbon Treaty, parties such as the NF are redundant, and when the laws against Xenophobia are passed, they will be outlawed. All they serve to do is to contain the opposition by recycling activists from one group to another. The same applies to the 'Left'. The difference is that there is some unity amongst the 'Left' at least on the single issue of opposing Nationalists. That is about as far as the unity goes though.

Parties are not entirely pointless. They are reservoirs of activists, and as such, are home to people with a passion to put right the ills in society. Sadly this passion, rather than being nurtured, is stifled by the leadership. The priority of Party leaders is to win seats in elections. to do this, the policies must change to suit the media-driven political climate. This requires a succession of compromises, twists and turns, which will reduce any party to being a mirror image of the governing party it seeks to oust. Parties which retain ideological purity fail. Individuals within parties who refuse to adopt every policy change are removed. If the goal is to win elections at any cost, then yes, parties can do this. If the goal is to halt the Globalist Zionist destruction of our world, then by their very design, they must fail.

If political parties are such a waste of time, effort, and resources, then what can be done to halt our decline, and our enemies' advances? Of prime importance is to stop playing games we cannot win. The Party System is such a game. Winning elections does not produce power, elections are only won by those who have power - or to be more accurate by those who do the bidding of the real power which controls all elections. the only instances when the democratic process is worth joining is at the parish level. Parish Councils very often are undermanned, and all it takes to get on a council is to put your name forward. If you are unopposed, the seat is yours. Party affiliation will provoke interest and possibly opposition. standing as an independent individual avoids this - and allows the individual to speak freely.

What we must do is stop attacking one another. There are Police Informers and agents provocateur placed in all organisations. Whereas it is important to expose the shills, it is vital to not become paranoid and point the finger of accusation at anyone who has opinions which differ from one's own. Likewise the Left-Right nonsense must be dropped. There are good Nationalists who oppose internationalism due to love of their nation, not hatred of others; there are good Socialists who oppose materialism through an appreciation of the value of humanity over commerce; similarly many Anarchists take their opposition to Government from an awareness of the corruption inherent in the system, and the propensity of Government of any hue to oppress and manipulate the people. Refusing to cooperate with one another by compartmentalising our beliefs and the beliefs of others, is exactly what the Establishment need us to do. We do not have to agree on everything. Our common opposition to the Internationalist menace is reason enough to cooperate. The Zionist cabal is destroying the only world we have, and fighting amongst ourselves only helps them. United we are strong, divided, our efforts are pointless.

All that can be achieved by fighting for ideological purity is to ghettoise ourselves. We will achieve the purity we seek at the expense of losing any hope of protecting the ones we love from the Global Prison being built around us. Our children will have no future other than as slaves to materialism and cannon fodder for commerce. Whatever '-ism' we attach to ourselves, we will still be crushed under the heel of the Global Jackboot. Fighting silly street battles and Internet wars will do none of us any good. We need to unite if only to stop the completion of the Internationalist Empire. After that we may fight against one another again, if we still haven't learnt the value of understanding and appreciating our individual strength and worth.

In practical terms we must take the fight to where it matters - to everywhere we can. We must speak to everyone of every political hue. We must agitate on every forum, every social network, in every workplace, and every interaction. We are losing this fight because we are acting as players in a pantomime not or our making. We need to exit the stage and take over the reality beyond the theatre. And we need to do this now. 'Tomorrow' will be too late.

The annual spectacle of Remembrance Day ostensibly commemorates the sacrifice of the men and women who died fighting for the survival of the British Empire in the War of 1914-18. Subsequent wars involving the British military (with the exception of the 1948 War in Palestine) have been added to the Great War, as a focus for contemplation. Alike to every almost officially sanctioned event, the truth behind the ceremony is very different to that which we are made to believe.




The Great War was labelled as the 'war to end all wars'. This was, of course, nonsense.

Since 1945, the British military have been involved in wars across the world. In many they have been publicly humiliated as the Empire has collapsed to the point that aside from a few rocks scattered across the globe, the British nation has been reduced to the British Isles alone (and not even to all of them). The same elite control the interests which were formally known as the Empire, but they operate behind the scenes rather than overtly. Now, Britain herself has been absorbed by the European Union, and the age old dream of the Khazars to occupy all of Europe has been realised. Khazars control every nation of the EU, Eurasia, North America, and elsewhere. This is what the wars of the Twentieth Century achieved.

Now, in the early Twentyfirst Century, we have the lie of the War on Terror. TV-viewing retards have been convinced that for the first time ever (and not since) steel-framed buildings have collapsed to dust due to fire (I wish I was joking, but this is the fable), and that a tiny group of Muslim extremists are responsible. Those who know this is absurd are herded by the likes of Alex Jones into believing that '9/11 was an inside job' - safely venting their anger at political puppets who serve the real Zionist culprits who control the establishments of the EU, USA, etc. This has led to the ongoing wars in Africa, the Middle East and Central Asia, in which British, American and allied servicemen are murdering civilians on an industrial scale. In Iraq alone the death-toll is approaching two million - people murdered in their own countries for the crime of living in territory with resources, artifacts, and strategic importance coveted by the Globalists.

In Afghanistan, the British and American military are guarding the poppy fields to ensure that our streets are awash with the poison of Heroin, which destroys individuals, families, and entire communities. These same soldiers are treated as heroes when they parade in British and American towns. How are they heroes? What is heroic about murdering people in their homes, enforcing food and medicine embargoes to kill civilians (especially babies) with malnutrition and disease, and with helping the establishment to produce drugs which are wrecking the home nations? The heroes are the men and women of the (Afghani and Iraqi) Resistance who are fighting to remove the forces of occupation from their lands. These people are labelled by the Zionist media lie machine as Terrorists.

On Remembrance Day we must remember the victims of war - the civilians butchered in Iraq, Afghanistan, Somalia, Palestine, Hiroshima, Nagasaki, Dresden, Hamburg, and too many other places; the soldiers who naively volunteered to enlist in the military in wars which served no national interest, and which in fact invited attack by people reacting to the actions of soldiers in uniforms bearing our flags; the conscripts who fought against their will, the conscientious objectors and deserters who were murdered for doing the right thing and refusing to fight for the Khazar elite. We must also remember those responsible for war - the Zionist-Plutocratic-Masonic-Royal Establishment; the psychopathic volunteers who enjoy killing for money; the politicians and media who push the lie that we must 'support our troops' in these insane and criminal campaigns.

The Armed Forces should exist for the sole purpose of defending the Nation from all who threaten it - be they financial parasites, Monarchists, Sabbatean Cultists, unassimiable immigrants or those who advocate imperialism and atrocities on our own or foreign shores. The most fitting tribute to the victims of war is to campaign for the military to be brought home, and for the war criminals in or out of uniform to be executed. Never again must our military be reduced to the role of paid butchers in service of our real enemies. The role of the military should be to defend the nation from enemies domestic and foreign who threaten our homeland - nothing else. National Freedom and Imperialism cannot coexist. No more wars for Zionist Profit and Empire.

Contrast this...

Obama: Hasan May Have ‘Cracked’ From ‘Stress’ | The FOX Nation

On Fort Hood shooting, Obama says: Do not jump to conclusions | Jerusalem Post

with this...

Round Up Hate-Promoters Now, Before Any More Holocaust Museum Attacks - CBS News, by Bonnie Erbe.

The Big Hate - NYTimes.com, by Paul Krugman.

- - -

If Major Nidal Malik Hasan were White these people wouldn't hesitate to recognize and denounce his motives. Likewise if James von Brunn had been a palestinian muslim. The one constant is that when jews perceive a threat to jewish interests, the conclusions they jump to get aired, no matter how insane, illiberal, or insensitive, and usually without any challenge or retraction. When there is no direct threat to jewish interests, as with the Fort Hood attack, then defending against indirect threats to minority privilege (the presumption that non-Whites, including jews, are disadvantaged) and dual loyalty (it's ok to be a jew or muslim first) is paramount.

There is no need to jump to conclusions about the anti-White regime. Pay attention to its reaction to any particular clash of White and non-White interests and the conclusions jump out all by themselves.

Guy Fawkes hailed from Yorkshire - the historic county of Northern England which was also home to the much loved Robin Hood. Alike to Robin Hood, Guy Fawkes was a revolutionary who sought to help the people of England by combating the anti-Christian despots who had usurped power from the indigenous population. Unlike Robin Hood, the truth of whom is shrouded in mystery and folklore, Fawkes is well documented. He heroically fought against the despicable Stadholders in the Spanish Netherlands in an attempt to liberate the people from the tyranny of Protestantism. It was in the Netherlands that Fawkes became an expert in the use of explosives - an expertise which made him a key part in the Gunpowder Plot of 1605.

In 1605 England was ruled by King James I. This was the monarch responsible for the blasphemous King James Bible in which it is stated that Kings rule by Divine Right. This Bible has become the most widely used Protestant Bible and is so far removed from the real Christian texts that it sits better alongside the Talmud than it does the teachings of Christ. In 1604, King James attacked the Catholics of England in such strong terms that it became certain that the persecution of Christians by the Protestant heretics would be increased beyond any tolerable limits. This fear would prove to be prophetic as within the century came the rule of Oliver Cromwell - the most evil man to rule England since William the Bastard.

To his eternal credit, even though Guy Fawkes suffered the most unimaginable tortures, this true hero refused to name any of his co-conspirators, save only the ones he knew were already dead. Sentenced to be 'Hung, Drawn and Quartered', Fawkes cheated the sick and depraved blood lust of the Monarchy by hurling himself from the hangman's scaffold, breaking his neck - thus depriving the enemies of humanity from ripping him apart whilst still alive.

Guy Fawkes will forever be remembered as the man who attempted to destroy the rule of King James and those around him who we would now call Zionists. To quote the popular rhyme :

"Remember, remember, the Fifth of November,
Gunpowder, (t)reason and plot,
I see no reason why gunpowder treason,
Should ever be forgot."

Well said. Let us forever remember this honourable gentleman and his comrades who fought to save us from those he foresaw would enslave us all.

Guido Fawkes - Presente!