|
|---|
Friday, 25 September 2009
To quote Thomas Jefferson, "every generation needs a new revolution."
At first glance this statement seems to be a noble and realistic assertion made by a man who personally experienced revolution and knew by experience that in order to protect hard-won freedoms, each generation must be ever vigilant and prepared to overthrow a new generation of oppressors. Thomas Jefferson was a signatory of the Declaration of Independence which marked the birth of the USA as an officially independent nation. He went on to become the third President of the USA. Jefferson was an architect of the American Constitution, and in every way an insider in the revolutionary movement which split the British colonies from rule by the British State. That is how official history has recorded the man, but as those who delve beyond the carefully prepared version of reality will know, what we are told to believe, rarely, if ever, has any substantial similarity with what really occurs.
Jefferson, as an insider, knew that the Colonial revolution was a sham and that power remained firmly in the hands of the Sabatteans in charge of the British Empire. As a close associate of the other Founding Fathers, he was linked to the highest Freemasons in the overseas British Establishment. It is claimed that he was not a Freemason himself, but he was certainly favourable to them. In all probability he was a secret Mason, although that is an issue which is deliberately left unclear by those who gain by maintaining he was not of the Craft.
The British Revolution in North America was a manipulated event which saw genuinely concerned Britons fighting a fratricidal war for ideals which were betrayed by those who led them into battle. The Loyalists were betrayed by an establishment which had no interest in maintaining overt control, and the Republicans were betrayed by fake revolutionaries who were linked by blood to the establishment, and remained in its employ throughout the struggle. The rival leaders were rivals in name only - they served a common purpose, to maintain the rule of the British Royal Family and their servants in the Rothschild financial dynasty. The blood spilt on both sides was real enough, as was the destruction of families and the implanting of hatred focused on one another rather than upon the string pullers of the pantomime in both Washington and London. Aside from the location, the scenario was repeated in an exact manner in Ireland.
Jefferson and his associates have been upheld in the American culture as heroes who framed the Bill of Rights to ensure that the enemies of humanity in the British Monarchy could never again oppress them. As can be clearly seen by current events in the USA under the presidency of Barack Obama, the Bill of Rights wasn't worth the paper it was printed on. Obama, alike to nearly (if not) all the Presidents of the USA is a blood relative of the British Monarchy. The USA did not achieve independence at all - the same bloodlines control it as always have. Those who died in the Revolution, died in vain.
The Jefferson quote, when considered in the context of the establishment insider who made it, is very interesting indeed. Can anyone doubt the veracity of the statement that each generation needs a new revolution, when one considers for whom Jefferson speaks?
Taking the Twentieth Century as a focus of study, can anyone deny that each generation was subjected to a revolution which strengthened the power of the oppressive establishment? The Great War of 1914-18 shattered the traditional structure of society and created a groundswell of hatred against the Capitalist structure. This was manipulated by the materialists into support of Communism which is pure Capitalism in disguise. Then came the rise of the anti-materialist doctrines in Europe which were crushed by the Zionist war machine in the 1939-45 conflict. The 1960s saw the sexual revolution which ripped the family apart and turned the natural form of society on its head with the fomenting of egocentric individualism, which rather than liberating the masses actually more greatly enslaved everyone. The 1980s saw the triumph of materialism with the selfishness of the Yuppie enshrined as a virtue, and compassion for one's indigenous brethren scorned. The century ended with a string of European wars and fake revolutions in which the openly Communist system was made to appear to collapse. The truth was that the rot of the Christian West was so far gone that it was ready for absorption into the Talmudic system. The substitution of Judaeo-Christianity for authentic Christianity (which is the absolute opposite of Talmudism) was completed in a series of generational revolutions, each a step more degenerate than the last.
Jefferson was a mouthpiece for the Globalist cabal. His statement was phrased in such a way as to give the appearance of defence of the common man against the tyranny of the elite, making the Globalist stooge appear a hero. This technique is common to the establishment. What better way to show one's power than to state one's objectives, and not only provoke no dissent, but in actuality, provoke applause and blind support. The gradualism of a revolution per generation is an old technique. Jefferson was espousing Fabianism before the term was officially coined.
Never underestimate the cunning of the enemy. Never take at face value anything said by people in positions of authority - to do so is to accept their lies and to pave the way for your own enslavement.
Tuesday, 15 September 2009
Europeans who are not totally self-absorbed cannot fail to be aware of the influence of the influx of millions of unassimiable aliens into our homelands. The reaction of many people who find themselves discriminated against in jobs, housing and health care, for no reason other than being a member of the indigenous population (or in the case of overseas Europe, the founding population), is understandable outrage. This outrage tends to be focused against the newcomers, and not against the globalists who so damaged our nations as to justify mass immigration to fill the places of those who were slaughtered to further the self-serving aims of the internationalist cabal. An issue of much importance which we tend to overlook, is the importance of understanding how the strangers in our midst see we Europeans (including Australians, Argentinians, Americans et al). The typical English woman exhibits a complete lack of morality, flaunting herself, having sex with many different men (and women), exposing her breasts, wearing a skirt which barely (if at all) covers her backside, drinking herself into oblivion, and either eating so much junk she resembles a pig in lipstick, or so little she looks like an emaciated inmate of a British Concentration Camp during the Boer War. White women dress in the manner of prostitutes, differing only in that they sell their bodies for alcohol and drugs, rather than purely for money. The behaviour of the male counterpart is virtually identical - even to the obsession with looks, the bisexuality and the drug abuse. Both the males and females behave as vain, materialistic, self-obsessed hedonists without any compassion or appreciation of the feelings of others.
Social networking sites such as Facebook exemplify the decline in the standards of a once decent people. To scour the pages, one finds a vast array of perversion, with people who would be treated as mentally ill in any society which had a sense of self-worth, flaunting their sickness as if it was normal - to the point that those who do not indulge in debauchery and exhibitionism, are regarded as outcasts to be despised and mocked. From men in frocks, to women in relationships posting pictures of their scantily or unclad bodies for the titillation and masturbation of strangers, anything goes. The catalogue of sickness is on public display for anyone to see. Sacred institutions such as marriage are ignored and reviled, with sites dedicated to perversity, adultery and all manner of deviancy abounding. This sickness on the internet is a perfect mirror for the sickness in the real world.
Ask yourself, how would a member of your own family from a few generations ago react to the degeneracy of what passes for European culture? How would a moral, disciplined, and spiritually based ancestor react to the world we now live in? How would anyone who has a sense of decency and empathy with the core feelings of his or her kinsfolk react to seeing children dressed as sex objects, to nominal adults behaving in the most self-indulgent and childish manner - caring not a jot for themselves or anyone else - to the masses drinking themselves to death or rushing headlong into self destruction with drug abuse, promiscuity and mindless violence? How would anyone with a sense of right and wrong react to the destruction of family and the replacement of reverence for the divine with worship of money, celebrity, fashion, sport, and self? The reaction would be horror and disgust - and quite rightly so.
The Islamification of Europe is an understandable reaction to the deliberately contrived destruction of our Christian culture. When we see men and women of our own race converting to Islam, we should not focus upon the Muslims who accept them into their culture, but on the degeneracy in our own communities which has pushed our own people into turning their backs on the globalist filth which has been substituted for our traditional and natural way of life. when We see alien drug dealers selling their poison to our children in exchange for sex, as much as we rightly despise these paedophiles, we must ask ourselves, why are these children seeking the oblivion of heroin, crack, alcohol etc, as a means of escaping the grim reality of life in our tortured society?
We need to stop focusing on the scapegoats which the globalist mafia have provided for us. Certainly we need to return to a homogeneous society, but we need to accept that the foreigners who walk amongst us have been lured here with lies of our nations being better places to live. They have been molly-coddled and given preferential treatment by our rulers - they didn't ask for this treatment until they were made aware that the host society was so decadent it would grant them all material benefits available. in reality this molly coddling is a trap for them to undermine their spiritual culture and enfeeble them alongside the indigenous peoples.
Our priority must be to look at what is happening to our people and to combat it. We must reject the purveyors of pornography, we must turn off the TV mind control apparatus, we must awaken ourselves to our own beauty and strength - and permanently expel the deeply entrenched enemy which has manipulated our nations to the point that they would no longer be recognisable to even our immediate forefathers.
The sickness which walks the corridors of power and has sexualised our culture and replaced the divine with Mammon is manifest in how our people behave. We need to take a step back and see ourselves as others see us. only by so doing may we arm ourselves to destroy that which is destroying us. We cannot heal our people by attacking others. The sickness within must be the focus of all our attention.
Friday, 11 September 2009
On The 11th September 2001, the Zionist Illuminati launched a murderous attack on the ordinary people of the USA. The aim, and result, was to terrify the people into accepting a war of aggression for the establishment of a Globalist military presence in Central Asia - a presence to link up the web of bases which will be used to attack anyone who resists the Global Superstate. The atrocity was carried out by Zionists with passports giving them the nationalities of the USA, UK and Israel. These documents are to these Global citizens merely useful tools. Their only loyalty is to the Sabbatean cult of materialism and self-worshipToday let everyone remember the actions of the puppets in positions of official power, and of the trained murderers of the CIA, MI5, and the MOSSAD who collaborated in the implementation of these homicidal and pathological crimes. Let us also remember the faithful servants of Mammon in the BBC, CNN and the other branches of the controlled media who covered up for the criminals, and in the leaders of the controlled opposition (such as Alex Jones and Michael Moore) who worked tirelessly to focus the blame on the American government and not on the Khazar elite who are responsible for the murders of 11/09/2001, and for the millions of deaths which have followed at the hands of the trained killers in the British, American and coalition forces.
To use their own slogan - Never Forgive, Never Forget.
Wednesday, 9 September 2009
I've used the term faux-White in essays and comments here and in other forums. It merits an explanation.
By faux-White I mean specifically those double-talking pro-jews who try to dictate to Whites who we are and what we're permitted to think. Their rhetoric is also notably disingenously anti-"liberal". They won't squarely face the anti-White nature of neo-liberalism or the jewish interests it serves. They espouse a carefully constrained race-realist neo-"white" version of neo-liberal "non-discrimination": we're all equal but jews are more equal.
For a good example of in-your-face faux-White pro-jewish arrogance read just about anything written by The Undiscovered Jew. For example, see his comments at OneSTDV's "More Thoughts on White Ethnostate". For a double dose of faux-Whiteness see his exchange with Auster in Is human bio-diversity the next conservatism? I noted the strange humor they find in their own confused hypocrisy in A Moron Amused by a Fool Helping an Idiot.
I don't think it's a coincidence that faux-Whites are often semi-jews. They exhibit a deep psychological conflict, craving for whatever reason to be seen as White, or more accurately "white", while deprecating Whiteness. They echo neo-liberal anti-White guilt-tripping even as they strike a pose against it. They tend to ignore, distract from, or dissemble about jewish exclusion/particularism/discrimination/supremacism and anti-White culpability.
Contrast faux-Whites with ordinary Whites, who generally don't want to discuss race, and certainly not jews, but when we do we tend to speak earnestly, without guile. Then compare faux-Whites with ordinary jews, who tend to be openly concerned about what they think is best for jews, and almost unanimously recoil with disgust at White anything. The main difference is that faux-Whites are able to partially mask this disgust and are more cryptic or even in complete denial about the primacy of their pro-jewish priority, but they tellingly denounce anyone who sees through them as "anti-semitic". Rather than attacking from outside they prefer to cloak themselves in "white" as they subvert/co-opt/neuter Whiteness from within.
For more on neo-liberalism, White/jew double standards, and typical faux-White behavior see Fruitloopable Presumption, The Urge to Purge, A Censorious Debate, and Race Realism Meets Tribal Denial (Mencius Moldbug.is more iconoclastic reactionary semi-jew than faux-White).
The mainland of the British Isles is named 'Great' Britain to distinguish it from 'Little' Britain, or as it is now called, Brittany and the Channel Isles. The word Great refers to size, and not to any favourable quality as flag-waving jingoists would like us to believe. Whether Britain was ever 'Great' is a matter for debate, but what is certain now is that, aside from the countryside and the minority of decent people who suffer under the heel of the sub-human moronic masses, it most certainly is not in any way a land which brings about a feeling of pride for its residents. The British were, until recent times, a fiercely proud people. This stems from the merging of ancient peoples from the European family into what became the modern Britons. The Germanic tribes (Angles, Saxons, Frissians, etc), and the earlier migrants from Scandinavia (the Norsemen, Vikings) settled and mixed with the few remaining Romans who had come before, added to the culture and family-centred spirit of the Celts who formed the majority population at the time. It is true that the Druidic caste of the original peoples of the Isles were subjected to persecution by the Romans, however overall, contrary to the official historical record, the waves of immigration from the east were relatively peaceful and the European migrants who came to the British Isles blended with the original people, creating a stable, regionally proud, yet nationally conscious, homeland. It was only with the coming of a disruptive and incompatible alien elite that this unity of culture and purpose was broken.
The beginning of the decline of the British came when the ruling Monarchy abandoned the spiritual direction of the people in favour of the individualistic and materialistic doctrine of Capitalist-Anglicanism. The original 'religion' of the people was the Druidic doctrine, which was family and nature centred. In essence, the religion was a method for transmitting the ancient knowledge of the people of the Isles who survived the destruction of the former global civilisation. The hostility of the Romans impacted upon the ability of the people to maintain the traditions of the ancestors, but with the departure of the imperialists, the natural emphasis on family and society was restored. This was perfectly compatible with the Norse religions, which were in many ways variations of the old traditions which had been taken to the Scandinavians by people kindred to the indigenous folk. Sadly, the Roman assault on the heritage of the ancient civilisers resulted in the information they bore having to be transmitted in the manner of a coded mythology - which has had repercussions through the centuries, with our true history becoming lost in a sea of folklore and fantasy. For those with the key to understanding, the information is still there, however much of it has become generally inaccessible.
As a people, the British have suffered more than any other nation under the heel of the materialist caste. Our spiritual unity has been ripped apart with the false dogma of Anglicanism promoting all manner of un-natural evils, such as infanticide, fratricide and mammonism. Britain became known as the workshop of the world, but fitting description would be the workhouse and sweatshop. The British people suffered terribly to fulfill the imperialist dreams of their oppressors, who they ironically became conditioned to see as their betters. The Royal Family and their Rothschild accomplices butchered the British, enslaving them and poisoning their minds with lies about the 'protestant work ethic'. It was only when the brutality against the true Britons became unbearable that the cosmopolitan slave traders shifted their unforgivable practice onto the people of Africa. By this time, they had murdered massive numbers of Britons in the mills of England, the 'Royal' pirate navy and in the Irish potato famine. For fear of a just revolution seeing the heads of the tyrants removed from their parasitic shoulders, the Royals and their comrades in despotism were forced to alter the techniques by which they continued to oppress Britons and many other peoples from across the world.
The 'British' Empire was an Empire in the interests of international finance capitalism, and was controlled by people who had no roots in the British nation. It was the fore-runner for the global superstate which we are near to entering - ad indeed the same vermin were in charge - the Royal Family and the Rothschilds. Having tried unsuccessfully to destroy the British people, the ruling elite pushed the agenda forward with fratricidal warfare, such as the murder of the Dutch farmers in Southern Africa, in the Boer War, and the butchery of our kinsmen in the Crimea. In the twentieth century the decline of the British nation, which had been carefully planned by the Fabian scourge, was accelerated with the murder of an entire generation of the nation's finest men in the Great War, known afterwards as the First World War. When this also failed to annihilate the spirit of the people, the plutocratic mafia and the traitors in the Nazi hierarchy organised the butchery of Europe to resume in the Second World War. In that contrived conflict, the financial elite gained mastery over all of Europe, and using the lie of the holocaust, they were able to sow the seeds for the infliction of thought control on the people using the weapon of political correctness, and guilt for the deaths of the 6 million Jews. In reality the Jewish death-toll was far smaller - although ordinary Jews did suffer as the Zionist movement needed some deaths in order to justify their theft of the land of Palestine.
The aftermath of the Second World War gave the Fabian Zionists the opportunity to finally break the spirit of the British people. Using the lie of the Holocaust to silence any calls for national pride, the Royals and their lackeys in Westminster managed to achieve what centuries of persecution had failed to - they were able to make the indigenous people feel afraid to have any sense of self-worth. This weapon was then used to prevent any opposition to the machinations of the ruling caste, by categorising anyone who objected to the imposition of humanist-materialism (communitarianism) as a Nazi. The fact that the accusations levelled against the German Nazi Party were the work of malicious propagandists in no way lessened the impact of the labels 'anti-Semite', 'racist' etc. The real National Socialists were betrayed by the cabal around the illegitimate Rothschild, Adolf Hitler, with many being murdered for refusing to accept his betrayal of the folk-centred ideology and its replacement with a militaristic xenophobic materialism.
We now live in a land which our forefathers would disown. Personal responsibility and Family have been replaced with individualist selfishness and reliance on the neo-Soviet State. Community with the ancestors and the divine have been replaced with a soul-less materialism and a hatred for tradition and heritage. Appreciation of natural beauty has been replaced by a drive to destroy the land fro profit, and on an individual level by the devotion to fashion and the obsession with image. Style without substance has replaced an understanding of the need for balance in all things - indeed what passes for style is proof that the ruling caste are enjoying making the masses act in the manner of circus animals. On a more serious note, the justice of the community has been replaced by the power of the law - with insane punishments for political transgressions (thought crime) running side-by-side with the molly-coddling of rapists, murderers, and thieves - although when one considers that these are the attributes of the Royal Family, and their political-economic-religious underlings, that is only apt.
We now live in a lawless, soul-less, rootless hellhole. The only consolation we may grasp is that the Illuminati through their puppet Marx declared in advance that the sub-human masses, the lumpen proletariat, the 'Chavs', would be eliminated once they had helped undermine the greater society. Surely the demise of this scum amongst us must be nigh?
Tuesday, 8 September 2009
UN wants new global currency to replace dollar - Telegraph:
In a radical report, the UN Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD) has said the system of currencies and capital rules which binds the world economy is not working properly, and was largely responsible for the financial and economic crises.So much for that old amero "conspiracy theory". Globalists, demonstrating how to not waste a crisis, are now openly proposing a global currency. And even if this radical proposal goes nowhere it helps make the relatively less radical amero (which will remain a "conspiracy theory" right up until it or the UNo becomes reality) that much more likely.
It added that the present system, under which the dollar acts as the world's reserve currency , should be subject to a wholesale reconsideration.
Although a number of countries, including China and Russia, have suggested replacing the dollar as the world's reserve currency, the UNCTAD report is the first time a major multinational institution has posited such a suggestion.
In essence, the report calls for a new Bretton Woods-style system of managed international exchange rates, meaning central banks would be forced to intervene and either support or push down their currencies depending on how the rest of the world economy is behaving.
Friday, 4 September 2009
We are on the verge of the establishment of a single global authority. For the first time in officially recorded history, the ruling caste is within grasp of achieving its age old objective - the domination of the masses of the world, and the subjugation of all those outside the ruling caste, to the control of the self-chosen elite.It is exasperating to see that at a time when the sheeple are being conditioned to accept the chains of debt which enforce the global slave state, party politicians are still playing the same failed games of trying to gather the most votes and activists, at the expense of other parties which are ostensibly fighting on the same side. Is it possible that the rival leaders know that democracy can never be anything other than manipulation of the herd? With this knowledge are they taking money from people desperate enough to think their leaders can save them from the global Zionist beast by winning seats in puppet show Parliaments? This would explain their behaviour in a rational, albeit despicable and corrupt manner.
In England we have a neo-Soviet government which has operated along Fabian lines for generations. At present the main factions are the Labour and Conservative Parties, although this is about the only change since the days of the Tory and Whig factions. The Party of Government pushes the globalist agenda, which the Party of Opposition objects to. When the parties switch place, the agenda continues, with the former opposition faction pushing the agenda even more virulently than its alleged rival when that party was enjoying the lime light of phony power. Parties which try to get a share of this farce either are deluded to the point they really believe they can change the course the international financiers have set the country on, or, more likely, they understand the game and know that they can get fat and rich if they play along and only discuss issues which are acceptable to the establishment.
In the European elections, we had the outrageous exhibition of petty politicking with States-rights parties refusing to co-operate in order to halt the consolidation of power by Central Government in Bruxelles and Strasburg. Using the nonsense of hiding behind ideological details, parties which had the real opportunity to achieve a landslide victory over the Euro-centralist and federalist parties, threw the advantage away in pointless vote splitting. The last election may have been the last chance to get enough anti-EU candidates into parliament to dissolve the Union. The fact that the factions fought against one another in the interest of personal financial gain, shows that they really had no interest in saving the sovereign nations. This is the essence of party politics - rival factions are created to fight one another, to ensure the establishment is never seriously threatened and the false image is maintained that 'the people' are in control of their own affairs.
The globalist machine is slick. Those who aim for global dominance have been pursuing this goal for many hundreds of years. They have no interest in day-to-day political fads, other than to use them as distractions to avert attention from their real agenda. Modern political parties are either wholly controlled by the establishment, or otherwise manipulated. If the globalist elite are to be in any way challenged, the party strategy has to be completed overhauled, if not abandoned.
The strength of the party lies in its ability to gather a large number of activists, however therein lies its weakness. In order for a party to function it must have a structure. If everyone in the party has the same rank and input on policy, the risk is for the party to become so bogged down in bureaucracy as to become unable to function realistically. In order to combat this, control by committee is an option - however, committees tend to become breeding grounds for factionalism, and for splits. This is not inevitable, but power struggles do seem to be common. Whether as a result of egomania, or due to the presence of elements planted for the purpose of causing division, committees more often than not degenerate into mutually hostile camps. The alternative to this is rule by a small number forming the party elite, sometimes even being an elite of one - this structure offers the greatest stability, but also the greatest danger for manipulation (and should the leader lose touch with the rank and file, for internal demise). All that is needed to take over an entire movement is for the leader, or leadership to be compromised. An entire nation can then be brought into the globalist fold by the leadership betraying the wishes of the people they purport to serve - as arguably was the case with the NSDAP which was betrayed by those at the top.
If we take a leap of faith and assume that the party of our choice is structured in a manner which ensures that the voice of the ordinary member is heard, yet also limits the possibility of infiltration, take-over or schism, then the merits of this remarkable party still have to be considered with regards to how well the party operates within the confines of the overall party system of the nation. This is where the futility of competing in the system comes to the fore.
In Europe, we have several tiers of government. We have the local level of town councils, parish councils and metropolitan wards. Above this we have district and county councils. Next we have regional authorities, then national (State) governments, and finally the Federal Government. At present this is as far as it goes, although there are plans to merge the European Union with the North American Union , and eventually create a Global government. By eventually, I should really say, as soon as is practicable.
The biggest problem facing all peoples of the world is the drive towards a Global State. All the problems which face us - economic, environmental, migratory, cultural, etc - all of the great problems of our time stem from the machinations of the Globalists. We are to be forced to pay a Global Tax justified by the Global Warming lie. Global Taxation, Global Policing, Global Administration, Global Servitude - that is the future if we allow this monstrosity to continue consolidating power unchallenged. The solution to Globalism is National Freedom. At this stage in the battle, nothing else matters. Without National Freedom, there can be no economic freedom, no cultural integrity, nothing but conformity and serfdom.
In Europe, and I suspect across the world, there is a ground swell of opposition to Globalism. In Europe in particular, this ground swell is being wasted by the practitioners of party politics. We have Nationalists, National Socialists, National Revolutionaries, Libertarians, Populists, Fascists, Economic Self-determinists, Ethno-Nationalists, to mention but a few of the varieties of organised formations opposed to the EU. Do these activists work in concert to dismantle the EU and alert the ordinary people to the threat against us all? No. They concentrate at least as much effort in attacking one another as they do in attacking the Globalists. To them, getting subscriptions to party papers, and getting people to carry meaningless membership cards matters more than forging ahead with a united campaign to release the nation states from the federal web. In elections they stand against one another on issues which are secondary to the prime purpose of restoring independence to the nation. To make the situation even more farcical, they pay the state massive amounts in deposits to stand for election - money which has been extracted from hard pressed activists and is spent on pointless campaigns which they cannot win due to their refusal to cooperate with others who are pro-independence.
The way parties waste resources and turn activists into disillusioned burnt out individuals who opt out of the struggle all together, is shameful. Parties are divisive in that they put the Party above everything. What good is ideological purity when your nation is gone, your culture has been replaced by a coca cola anti-culture, and your people are indistinguishable from the global swarm? Elections are futile because the institutions to which the candidate aspires to be elected, are owned and controlled by the Globalists, and at any rate, access is blocked by failure to cooperate with everyone who has a corresponding agenda. If parties did not exist, the internationalist cabal would invent them. They are a joke, a farce, and an affront to the intelligence.
Real change comes from within - from disengaging from all aspects of the fear and control mechanism, from attaining a sense of self-reliance, and understanding one's own strength. Parties concentrate activists in the same way as a farmer corals his sheep. Those who indulge in the fantasy of a revolution through the ballot box need to wake up and see that the revolution IS self-awakening and liberation from our oppressors by dismantling the system through non-cooperation. The Parties are but cards in the house of cards which we are led to perceive as an inevitable and omnipotent power structure. The strongest individual is the one with self realisation. Parties stifle this. The time to decide is now - will you awaken yourself to the false reality and help dismantle the materialistic illusion by withdrawing your support and encouraging others to do the same by your example, or will you bleat in the party fold and deserve the label of being one of the unthinking, and spiritually non-human Goyim? Your choice.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
