|
|
|---|
Tuesday, 29 June 2010
Misguided believers in the færy tale of 'democracy' expected that by voting out the Marxist Labour Party, all the ills which had beset the United Kingdom during the thirteen years of Labour misrule would evaporate and freedom would magically be restored. It is testament to the success of the indoctrination system that voters swallowed the lies of the politicians and turned out in significant numbers to mark a cross against the name of the puppet which offered the most convincing fable to appease their individual whims.The result of the election was the formation of a coalition government comprised of the Cohenservative Party and the Libertine Dæmoncrats. The controlled media promised that the new regime would bring about 'change'. Just exactly how much change resulted from the election can be gauged by the mini-Budget which took place last month.
The mini-Budget was vaunted by the media as the solution to the economic crisis ushered in by the previous administration. Oversimplifying world economics and politics to such an extent that without decades of 'dumbing down', no one would believe such ludicrous propaganda, the media presented the fantastic idea that the economic mess which had overcome the UK was solely caused by politicians, and could be reversed by replacing one set of politicians with another. Those who believe this nonsense most probably write letters to the fictional characters in 'soap operas' such as Eastenders.
So, looking beyond the lies, what has the Coalition Government achieved thus far? Well, as the good little puppets that they are, they have continued the anti-human agenda of the puppets who preceded them. Last month's Budget was a travesty. The media dutifully exaggerated any whiff of tax cuts then downplayed all aspects which will be detrimental to the nation. For example, the media emphasis on the additional £1000 tax allowance was practically orgasmic. One would be forgiven for believing that the British worker was £1000 richer thanks to the benevolence of the Coalition Government, but under closer scrutiny, the truth is that as the starting rate for tax is 10%, the individual tax payer will only gain £100 per year from this extension to the Allowance, not £1000 - big difference! Thus the British Worker will be less than £2 a week better off.
Along with the distorted coverage of the increased Tax Allowance, the media dutifully downplayed the hike in Value Added Tax (a tax used to enrich the bureaucrats of the Soviet European Union), which at 20% of all goods purchased (previously 15% at the end of 2009), will wipe out the insulting tax 'allowance' increase for the entire year, almost instantly. Yet again, the media crow over tax cuts but ignore tax hikes, and the fact that every man, woman and child in the UK (excepting those in the Establishment fold who can afford tax avoidance measures) will be significantly worse off as a result of the Government's tax grabs.
The outright lies of reducing the tax burden were a cynical attempt to pull the wool over the eyes of the people. The puppets in Westminster are simply continuing the old game of one administration creating debt, followed by an alleged opposite regime which has to reduce services in order to reduce the debt. The cycle continues regardless of the identities of the puppets, but then considering that the puppets are manipulated by the same puppet masters, it could be no other way. Whichever party is given the role of Government, be it Masonic Red (Labour), or Masonic Blue (Conservative), the Establishment maintains control, and wealth is redistributed away from the people into the coffers of the real power - the kabbalists of the City of London. An aspect of the Budget which scarcely received any attention was the passing of official control of the economy to the private bankers who call themselves the Bank of England. These monsters, centred on the Rothschilds and the Crown, have long ruled Britain's economy from behind the scenes. Now they are acknowledged as rulers of the economy - with the 'spin' that their position is one of benevolence!
So much for the 'change' in the country at the macro level, but what of the micro level? Surely the new regime must be delivering on its promise to unravel the Police State and the Puerile Communism which is systematically destroying Great Britain from within?
We have been told that the country is in dire financial straits, and to save our nation we must all make sacrifices. Not the banksters who are profiting like never before, not the international cartels who are devouring every last service and industry, not to mention land and property, no, it is we the people who are being made to pay for the destruction of our nation and to finance our own serfdom. The wars for Greater Israel and the destruction of Islam are to continue apace - with money ring fenced for the butchery of innocent Middle and Near Easterners. Where money is to be saved is by slashing expenditure by 25% in vital services such as Social Security and Healthcare. As a public servant myself, I am well placed to see these cuts in practice.
One would hope that politically carcinogenic and financially wasteful entities designed for the purpose of social engineering would be abolished in order to save money which could be spent of services for the good of the people. One would hope that the ridiculous and counter productive CCTV system would be turned off with resources focused instead on restoring a sense of nationhood rather than a culture of fear and criminality. One would...but then, that would be the way of sanity, and sadly, sanity is distinctly lacking in the administrative systems in Great Britain.
Rather than reducing the grip of Political Correctness, the new puppets have accelerated it. I have myself had to undertake 'Equality and Diversity' training, which is something I managed to avoid under Labour, but is now mandatory, and a legal requirement for all public and civil servants. The only way to avoid such mendacious thought policing is to resign from the public sector.
So, what is this 'Equality and Diversity' training which is so important that refusal to undergo it will result in breach of contract and instant dismissal? No doubt there are various forms by which the training is presented. For myself, it took the form of an excruciating and insulting act of herd control. I was made to sit in a room with about a dozen colleagues taking part in general exercises concerning general work issues such as Data Protection, Health and Safety, and Fire Legislation. This was spread across the best part of a working day. The objective was to personalise the training so to create a shared identity and a reluctance to 'rock the boat' by speaking with a different opinion to the group. The Equality and Diversity section of the training came at the end, once the group had been moulded into a malleable and obedient unit.
The common perception of Civil Servants is that we are robots, repeating the dictat of Government without thinking. The Establishment like to maintain this perception, and are actively attempting to turn it to a reality. Equality and Diversity Training in the Public Sector is part of a strategy to dehumanise those in the employ of the State, with the rest of society to follow. I relate here the methods used to brainwash State employees in order to warn the general public of the type of thinking which is set to destroy what is left of western society.
Suitably numbed by hours of tedium, we were harangued with diatribes about the blessings of multi-culturalism and the necessity to adapt to a changing world where cultures and peoples cross all boundaries. This is the dogma of internationalism, and the fact that it is mandatory for State employees speaks volumes. We were told that it is essential that everyone who comes into contact with the service must be treated as an individual and that all obstacles to accessing the service must be removed. This appeal to human decency and fairness shows an understanding of the English psyche. Sadly, this understanding has become a weapon against us. Numbed by tedium, we were now put into a position where any objection to the propaganda being spewed forth would be construed as refusal to do one's best for the public at large - which is tantamount to treason in the public sector.
Our beloved Coalition Government has gone further than any of its predecessors in advancing the anti-human internationalist cult. People in the employ of the State are being used as guinea pigs for total societal control. We are being subjected to psychological warfare techniques designed to break our resistance. The wider use in society as a whole comes through the media, legal and financial apparati, employing the exact same techniques of wearing the resistance of the individual down and manipulating what may be considered 'right' and decent to the point where opposition to evil is considered the greatest possible evil.
Having created an atmosphere which could be described as trance-like, the Equality and Diversity trainers moved the emotional and psychological abuse to a deeper level. We were each given cards with words such as 'Nigger', 'Paki', 'Gypo', 'Irish', Gay', 'Girl', 'Picnic', 'Nitty-Gritty', 'Poof' et al, and told to walk to a board with two intersecting circles upon it, and place the word in the left circle, right circle, or central point where the circles mixed. The left circle was for words which are always acceptable, the right for words which are never acceptable, and the central point for words which may be acceptable depending upon context. Each participant had to walk from the back of the room, to the board, and back again, watched by trainers and trainees alike. Once all words were in place each participant had to explain why he or she had placed the word in the chosen position.
To my disgust, but to no surprise, practically everyone placed the politically forbidden words in the unacceptable section, and when asked to describe the words, spoke in embarrassed and apologetic tones. The trainer began the ordeal of questioning by apologising for the 'evil' word 'Nigger', which made her sick to the stomach - she was actually tearful at this point. I am happy to say that although most of the trainees reacted as politically correct Pavlovian dogs, not everyone did. When my turn came, I explained that words have always changed meaning throughout time, and that all words are valid. I spoke of the danger of banning words as this was a short step to banning thought and extinguishing freedom for everyone. I stood my ground and placed all my allocated words in the acceptable circle. The trainers were at a loss as to how to handle my refusal to play the game. Discussion broke out amongst the group with people agreeing that the Equality and Diversity training was an insult to our professionalism and a waste of resources in these days when we are being told all services must achieve financial cutbacks! The training was cut short by the trainers who couldn't cope with a polite, well argued and firm rebuttal of political correctness.
We are in dire times. We must all resist. It is amazing how lap dogs of political correctness can be awoken from their trances by the example of a few individuals who will not submit to the herd. The Establishment is desperate to silence criticism of its agenda, but without the cooperation of those it employs, it has no chance. I experienced first hand the victory of reason over Sovietism. If we can replicate this, their house of cards will fall. We are that House and we can choose to bring it crashing down.
There is no democracy in Great Britain, or any other nation under the heel of the banking cartel. The only change that the election has brought is of one set of inanely grinning puppets for another. It is becoming increasingly obvious that the rulers do not represent the ruled. This is to our advantage. The more the Establishment loses its bond with the people, the less chance for the internationalists to achieve their goal. Times are dire, but ripe with potential. We must not waste the opportunities given us - no matter how small. In the end, we will win by using the enemy's arrogance and tyrrany against them.
Labels: Political Correctness, Westminster
Wednesday, 23 June 2010
Maywood to lay off all city employees, dismantle Police Department | L.A. NOW | Los Angeles Times:At a council meeting Monday night, city leaders said they were forced to dismantle the Police Department and lay off city workers because they lost insurance coverage as a result of excessive police claims filed against the department. They also blamed years of financial abuse and corruption from the previous council.
I have said that Mexico does not stop at its border, that wherever there is a Mexican, there is Mexico
- Mexican President Felipe Calderon
Labels: california, immigration, la raza, race
Tuesday, 22 June 2010
In The Eternal Obsession, Steve Sailer quotes Sarah Kaufman's WaPo article, Ballet series has lots of talent, little diversity:The companies are also overwhelmingly white and dotted with Europeans -- as they have always been. Diversity in ballet remains a serious problem for the small companies as well as the large, on the coasts as well as in the heartland. In the 21st century, we can put a black man in the White House, but as last week's survey shows, we can't put a black ballerina in the Opera House. Clearly, not enough work is being done to foster African American dancers. But with public money in their coffers, ballet companies -- and the local, state and federal funders -- need to make equal opportunity in the dancer ranks a priority.
Sailer then witlessly tries to dismiss this as friendly fire:I'm always struck by how white people are constantly admonishing each other
Sarah Kaufman thinks too many "white" people in ballet is a "serious problem", but she didn't have anything to say about that in Israel Ballet at Silver Spring Performing Arts Center. An all-jew troupe? That's just splendid. In fact, in Paul Taylor's Marvelous Melting Pot Kaufman gives the distinct impression she can't get enough of jewish "diversity". In To strengthen Jewish identity in America through the arts and humanities Richard Siegel, "the Executive Director of the National Foundation for Jewish Culture, an organization dedicated to enhancing Jewish identity in America through the arts and humanities", cites Kaufman's article in defense of Taylor's production. Defense from what? Well, it seems some jews think Taylor's production wasn't jewish enough.
Kaufman's snide attack on "whites" in ballet echoes Harold Meyerson, who in Economy? What Economy? wrote about the "huge problem" of "whiteness" in politics, likewise using blackness as a proxy:In a year when the Democrats have an African American presidential nominee, the Republicans now more than ever are the white folks' party, the party that delays the advent of our multicultural future, the party of the American past. Republican conventions have long been bastions of de facto Caucasian exclusivity, but coming right after the diversity of Denver, this year's GOP convention is almost shockingly -- un-Americanly -- white. Long term, this whiteness is a huge problem.
Meyerson is #48 in The (shockingly jewish) Atlantic 50.
I'm struck, like many of Sailer's commenters, by a pattern of jews attacking "whites". That they are funded and broadcast by mainstream sources only underscores the seriousness of the problem. Contra Sailer it appears Kaufman and Meyerson don't consider jews "white", otherwise we could find them criticizing the more lopsided voting of jews, the bipartisan power of the Israel lobby, jewish over-representation on SCOTUS, in law generally, in finance, in media, or in pushing an anti-White agenda. It seems to me that anti-White jews behave as they do precisely because they consider their "jewishness" distinct from Whiteness.
I'm also struck by Sailer, a proponent of "human biodiversity", lamely describing this situation as "white people constantly admonishing each other". Is political correctness making him stupid, or is it the jewish genes he suspects he carries? Either way he can consider himself admonished.
Kaufman, meanwhile, has just been lauded by her anti-White/pro-jew peers. The Pulitzer Prizes | Citation:Awarded to Sarah Kaufman of The Washington Post for her refreshingly imaginative approach to dance criticism, illuminating a range of issues and topics with provocative comments and original insights.
Contrast this with Helen Thomas, who was excoriated and ultimately lost her job for making a provocative comment about jews.
Labels: anti-white, art, harold meyerson, media, sarah kaufman, steve sailer
Wednesday, 16 June 2010
In The anti-white left and the non pro-white right Auster once again describes the aggression of "liberals", like David Zirin, who he never identifies as a tribemate.
Once again Auster blames the "non pro-white right" "conservatives" for being worst:The liberal-left's bigoted campaign to delegitimize and dehumanize conservatives is thus total and absolute.
And once again Auster absurdly links all of this to his truest love, Israel. In conclusion an Auster commenter identifies the problem as a lack of "white" "tribal loyalty".
But the hell of it doesn't stop there. The worst part is that the conservatives themselves are so much under the thumb of liberal-left premises that they never identify what the left is doing to them, and never attack the left for what it is doing to them.
. . .
But they never identify what the left is really up to, namely removing of any human value from conservatives by painting them as hopelessly sick and immoral racists who deserve to be racially marginalized and turned into a dispossessed minority in their own country. The conservatives don't identify it, because they themselves have no principle by which they can oppose being turned into a dispossessed minority in their own country. And the reason they have no such principle is that they themselves subscribe to the liberal view that any concern by whites about race is disgusting and immoral.
Of course anyone who distinguishes jews from Whites, "left" or "right", is violating Auster's "liberal" view that any concern by Whites about jews is disgusting and immoral. In his view however, jews can be concerned about Whites - that's perfectly normal. In "Larry Auster's lies", for example, Auster explains his motivation for removing any human value from "conservatives" by painting them as hopelessly sick and immoral "racists" against jews:Here is my motivation: to expose the anti-Israelism and anti-Semitism that currently are harbored at the heart of the paleocon and immigration restrictionist movements, and to get conservatives and immigration restrictions to reject those evils, so that the cause of saving America and the West is not tainted and discredited by them and might actually have a chance of success.
By his own words and logic, what Auster is really up to is doing his part in the "liberal-left" anti-White cause he knows so well, campaigning to delegitimize and dehumanize the "racists" who identify jewish aggression against Whites. Auster wants Whites to feel tribal loyalty for jews (we're all just one indivisible "white" tribe, ready to defend Israel) even though jews, far from reciprocating in kind, treat us not just as "others", but as inferiors to be lectured, commanded, and ultimately punished if we disobey them.
Labels: anti-white, lawrence auster, liberalism
Sunday, 13 June 2010
The Madoff Circle: Who Knew What?, by Jake Bernstein, ProPublica: What these men undeniably shared were similar backgrounds and interests. Based largely in New York and South Florida, they moved through parallel milieus of affluent Jewish country clubs and synagogues. They were active in similar philanthropies and served on the boards of foundations, universities and yeshivas.
The cast of characters, spelled out mostly in complaints filed by the trustee and the SEC, includes: Carl Shapiro,, 97, a Boston-based philanthropist who made one fortune in ladies dresses and a larger one with Madoff; Robert Jaffe, 66, Shapiro’s son-in-law; Maurice “Sonny” Cohn, 79, a onetime Madoff neighbor turned business partner; Stanley Chais, 83, a close friend of Madoff’s for more than 50 years and one of his earliest investors; and Jeffry Picower, a lawyer and accountant, who recently died of a heart attack at 67.
None of these men has been charged criminally. Thus far, federal authorities have indicated in court filings that just one of them – Chais – is the subject of a criminal inquiry. A year ago, The Wall Street Journal, citing anonymous sources, reported that the U.S. Attorney's Office in Manhattan was investigating at least eight investors, including Picower, Chais and Shapiro.
All have denied being anything but victims of Madoff’s.
Chais, Cohn and Jaffe have drawn considerable ire from investors for running so-called feeder funds that channeled huge sums into Madoff’s investment business. Jaffe alone funneled more than $1 billion of investor money to Madoff, according to the SEC. He worked with Cohn in a business called Cohmad – a contraction of Cohn and Madoff – that operated out of Madoff’s offices. Contrary to what some investors in the funds believed, it appears the men did little to manage the money beyond simply collecting it for delivery to Madoff.
Members of this circle not only did far better than other investors, who averaged 10 percent to 12 percent returns annually, they also had a highly unusual level of input into the nature of their returns.
Labels: bernie madoff, economy, fraud, jewish malfeasance, plutocracy
Israel is a state which came into existence in 1948. From its very inception, it has courted controversy, and polarised the opinions of people who care to take interest in the world around them. Israel deservedly demands attention. Created by the Zionist criminal network through its agents in Great Britain, and its plaything, the United Nations, Israel was founded as a 'land without a people for a people without a land'. This noble ideal totally ignored the reality that the 'land' in question was home to 1.35 million Palestinian Arabs.
Why was the territory on the eastern shore of the Mediterranean given to people calling themselves Jews? Even if it had be uninhabited, as the propagandists claimed, what was the rationale for moving these people in particular en masse to this particular territory? Was this perhaps the only land available? The answer to this is that not only was the land NOT available (as it belonged to the Arabs), but it was not the only land that the people identified as Jews had been offered. No, the Arab land occupied by the modern state of Israel was the only land which the elders of Zionism would accept, and the presence of 1.35 million native inhabitants was of no consequence to them.
Conventional history tells us that the new bogey man (Napoleon 'Boney' Bonaparte being the first - Boney hence Bogey), Adolf Hitler, had hated the Jews so much that he wished to exterminate them, killing 6 million before being vanquished by the evil Europeans who allowed his atrocities to continue until he turned on them and they had no choice but to defend themselves. The survivors of this madman therefore needed somewhere to live unmolested, lest a new Hitler attempt to finish the job. They had lived in the land the Balfour Declaration would later grant them until being expelled by the evil Romans (more nasty Europeans), so it was only 'fair' and 'right' that they be given that land. Conventional history is a lie, and in the case of the a complete fairy tale. As Goethe put it,
"Not all that is presented to us as history has really happened; and what really happened did not actually happen the way it is presented to us; moreover, what really happened is only a small part of all that happened. Everything in history remains uncertain, the largest events as well as the smallest occurrence."
This is especially pertinent as applied to Israel.
We are supposed to believe that Israel was created to provide the persecuted Jews with a safe place to live. What we are not supposed to do is question the timescale of the building of Israel. Official history places the birth of Israel in 1948, however, it fails to mention the build up to the Israeli Declaration of Independence. The Zionist take over of Arab land had been on going for some time. Long before tales of Nazi persecution of Jews, people calling themselves Jews had been steadily emigrating to Palestine (with a significant number moving from the nation which was supposed to be hell bent on murdering them, Germany). The main drive had been under way following the promise of Zionist/Talmudist Ashkenazi, and British Government Minister, Arthur J Balfour, of the creation of a Jewish homeland bordering the River Jordan.
The story that Israel was created as a safe haven following the Nazi era is a lie. The incarceration of Jews as enemy aliens during the war came long after the 'British' Establishment promised to create Israel, and was used as a justification of the theft of Arab land, after the crime was committed. The notion that Israel was given to the 'Jews' as a result of Nazi persecution during the Second World War is laughable - it was promised to the Zionist elite by the British Establishment during the First World War (decades earlier).
The Establishment in Great Britain is almost (if not entirely) comprised of people who pay loyalty to the Luciferian religion, which in its political expression is known as Zionism. From the time that the usurper to the throne, William of Orange, arrived on British soil with his Talmudic entourage, the anti-Gentile supremacists have held sway over the British Isles. The entire surviving aristocracy and monarchy are so mixed with the followers of the Talmud, that it is no exaggeration to say they are no longer of the same stock as the indigenous population of the Isles. For this reason, one must regard the 'British' elite as parasitic aliens who serve their non-indigenous brethren to the detriment of all who do not adhere to the Talmud.
Ersatz Israel (yes Ersatz, not Eretz!) was created by criminal Zionists in London. London had been the hub of the Sabbatean cabal for centuries, providing the internationalists with the ideal staging ground for expansion of their financial tentacles throughout the world under cover of the British Empire. In the twentieth century the British Empire had to be abolished in order to make way for the mass migrations of peoples and cultures. Homogeneous nations with adherence to tradition, religion and morality stood in the way of the move to global governance. Every nation had to be mixed together in order to make nationhood irrelevant as all people would be found everywhere, and all share the same culture-less irrelevant existence. The Sabbateans had to move their centre of operations to a new location which would be exempt from the mongrelisation of the rest of the planet, somewhere they could preserve the purity of their own bloodlines whilst using financial, political and military pressure to ensure the miscegenation of all outside their protected territorial area - and that location was to be Israel.
Through their economic power, the Russian Empire had been broken and passed to Sabbatean Jews, using the lie that they were 'liberating' the people from the evils of capitalism. Next Germany was crippled economically, then 'miraculously' raised to the position of a world power by the same banking interests. With Zionists installed in Moscow and Berlin to compliment the main centre of operations in London, the stage was set for the pantomime act of the Second World War. The suffering of the hundreds of millions who died, were injured, lost loved ones etc, served to demoralise all of Europe (and other embroiled lands), whilst temporarily satiating the bloodlust of the Sabbateans.
The purpose of the two World Wars was to destroy European resistance to internationalism, and to make massive profits for the industrialists and bankers. The genuine Nationalists (from across all of Europe) who were hoodwinked by the Zionists in charge of the Nazi regime were murdered at the Nürnberg show trials and similar acts of legalised terrorism. The bankers and industrialists who funded the war and profited from the labour camps such as Auschwitz, financially raped the carcass of Europe which their assets had led to the point of oblivion. From this ruin, a new power was born. Nationalism, mono-culturalism, and ethnic homogeneity were made into unforgivable crimes - except for the people who were hailed as victims of an attempt to destroy their identity and their very existence. These dupes were to herded into Israel to provide a cover for the Sabbatean elite who masquerade as Jews.
What is special about Israel? Why is this the part of the world the Sabbatean criminals have chosen to operate from? Israel lies at the meeting point of Africa, Europe and Asia. It is also the place where the Bible was written. For billions of people across the Earth, Israel holds a special place as the spiritual centre of the Earth. The two main religions of the world (Christianity and Islam) cite the land of Israel as the place where God revealed His laws. The reason that the internationalists have chosen Israel is not only its location, but its spiritual hold over many people.
The Israelites of the Torah were the people to whom God spoke, thus the people who currently call themselves Jews claim a religious birthright to the land. This, like all other Sabbatean/Zionist/Talmudic claims is largely a lie. History has been twisted to suit the internationalist worldview and the people who call themselves Jews have been used as a front for the internationalist one world elite. Because the Torah forms the foundation of both the Christian Bible and Muslim Qur'an, the People of the Book hold a special place amongst those who adhere to these religions. The claim of modern Israelis to be descendants of the Biblical Israelites is largely bogus.
The original Israelites left the Eastern Mediterranean not long after the time of Jesus. They migrated west and were absorbed into the nations of Western Europe, notably the Celtic, Nordic and Anglo-Saxon nations. It is a great irony of the twentieth century that people who genuinely had Israelite ancestry would be labelled as anti-Semites for opposing the financial power of non-Semitic bankers who claimed to be Jews. Soldiers in the British armed forces had more Israelite heritage than the people who were interned in the relocation camps and would later become citizens of Israel as a result of the machinations of the 'Jews' in charge of the regimes in London, Berlin, Moscow and Washington.
The vast majority of the people which had come to be known as Jews, were of Khazar descent, and had as much claim to the ancient Biblical lands of Israel and Judah as a Chinese Muslim would have to Mecca. Certainly it would be over simplistic to state that absolutely none of the Khazar Jews (the Ashkenazim) could claim a genetic heritage with the people of Biblical Judah and Israel, but the number would be a tiny fraction of a percent,. The Khazar nation had converted en masse eight centuries into the Christian Era, with the ordinary people having no blood link to the ancient Jews. The situation was complicated by the presence in the Khazar domains (roughly from the Crimea to Georgia and northwards to the Don and Volga) of a very small number of Jews who claimed descendency from Japeth, however, the infusion of genes from the Semitic gene pool contributed by these people would be so dilute as to be wholly insignificant.
The overwhelming majority of those who have evicted the Semitic Arab people from the land stolen to create the modern nation of Israel, have no ethnic link to that land. That alone should have been enough to protect the indigenous population from the invaders. However, the lie of the Israeli State is that it is a homeland for a religious group. This is the twin headed nature of the Jewish character - it is at once ethnic, and religious. It was upon the religious aspect that the architects of Israel built the modern country.
In order to shepherd enough people into the territory of Israel, the myth had to be created that Jews in Europe were a people without a land. This was achieved by Zionist front organisations stirring up anti-Jewish hostility. Movements such as the NSDAP were funded and controlled by Zionists with the intention of using manipulating the Jewish as instruments to further their internationalist agenda. Rabbis, motivated by fear of seeing their power base crumble as ordinary Jews rejected the Talmud, worked side-by-side with non-religious Zionists to terrify ordinary Jews into staying apart from the wider population.
For the vast majority of Jews in the early twentieth century, Europe was the land they identified with. In Germany, for example, the number of Jews marrying outside the faith had reached 42% by 1925. This was replicated across Europe. The stranglehold of the Rabbis had been broken, and through assimilation with mainstream society, Talmudic Judaism was ceasing to exist as anything other than an anachronistic cult. With the opening up of the ghettos of the East, Judaism was in decline. For the shiftless Rabbinical caste, this would not do, and so the spectre of 'anti-Semitism' was invoked to terrify the Jews who embraced Europe back into the arms of the self-appointed leaders who had held sway over the Jewish people for too long.
The rise of anti-Semitism in the nineteenth and twentieth centuries came about as a part of the phenomenon of political Zionism. The Founding Fathers of the Zionist Movement knew full well that the Talmudic Faith was dying, so, in the time-honoured manner, they created anti-Semitic movements. This protection of Talmudic Judaism has always been to protect the Sabbatean/Luciferian cult which hides behind Rabbinical Judaism. The Talmudic religion is a racist perversion of the faith of the Israelites. As Jesus Himself stated, the followers of the Talmud 'call themselves Jews, but are not Jews', but are rather a 'Synagogue of Satan'.
The true Jews were the people who held true to the Written Law of the Torah. The Oral Law of the Talmud is the negation of Torah and is literally diabolical. Jesus' purpose was to bring the Jews back to God by freeing them from the evils of the Pharisees, who were the Rabbinical caste of His day. The claim of Israel that it is a Jewish State by means of religion is a lie of even greater magnitude than the claim of biological descent from the original Israelites.
A substantial percentage of the Jews of the East rejected Talmudic Judaism and the rule of the Rabbis. The Karaites (amongst others) upheld the Torah as the word of God and as such were relatively immune from the machinations of the religious leaders. Zionists worked with the Rabbinate to hide the many differences between the various types of Jews (ethnic, religious etc) and create a common identity. By funding anti-Jewish organisations and persecuting the common Jew, the assimilation process was interrupted and the freedom of the Karaites smashed. Zionist agents such as Hitler were of the utmost help in this matter.
To return to the political intrigues of the Zionist movement, Theodor Herzl and Ze'ev Jabotinsky can justifiably be named as the fathers of the modern theory of Political Zionism. This theory maintains that life in the Diaspora had reduced the once proud Jewish Nation to an unheroic mass of superstitious and backward people who were neither capable nor worthy of having a land of their own. After centuries of persecution, Herzl argued, a radical change in the Jewish character was necessary. The subservient Sabbath-observing Jewish traders had to give way to a new breed of energetic and proud Jews. This new class of Jews would be the best fighters, the strongest workers, articulate and intellectual, and would achieve this transformation only by shedding their primitive past and putting the ghetto and shtetl behind them in favour of a modern Euro-centric state - Israel.
Political Zionism in action became the driving force of the kibbutzim. Far from Israel being a land for the religious observance of the faith of Abraham, the state developed as a materialist entity. The relationship of Zionism to religious Jewry was, from its inception, precarious. Biblical Israel provided the geographical frontiers of the theoretical state, and a convenient historical justification for the claim that the Jews had a 'right to return' to a land which they had been forced to leave as a result of persecution by an alien occupying force. Zionism took from the Jewish religion anything which was useful to support its ideology. Zionism and Judaism collaborated on common areas in order to secure Israel as a nation, but the collaboration was always built on mutual need and mutual hostility.
Jabotinsky was more fervent than Herzl in his desire to establish a Jewish homeland in Israel. Whereas Herzl was prepared to build Israel by steady emigration of Jews from Europe into Palestine, and create two states side by side, Jabotinsky favoured a more rapid approach to colonising the country. His brand of Zionism was built on the idea of building an army which would be secretly placed on Palestinian soil and once numerically able, would drive the indigenous population out by acts of terrorism guerrilla warfare. In the end, the strategy of terror over-ruled the liberal Europeanism of Herzl, with Jabotinsky leading the persecution of the Palestinians which continues to this very day.
The Zionist regime in Israel is anti-Jewish. The Sabbatean cabal are showing themselves daily to be the enemies of peace and the God of Abraham. The Israeli Government is pressing to have a separation of Church and State, making a mockery of the claim that Israel is the Jewish State. The Commandment to Keep the Sabbath Holy is routinely violated in the materialist den of iniquity called Tel Aviv. Ancient Jewish cemeteries, such as the Second Temple Era Cemetery at Ashkelon are being bulldozed in acts of blatant desecration. Moderates such as Herzl have been replaced by extremists of the Jabotinsky mould. The evil Sabbatean Cult which has existed as a disease amongst Talmudic Jews has become the power behind the State.
Claims that it is anti-Semitic to oppose Israeli atrocities are nonsensical. The real Semites are the victims of Ashkenazi tyranny. The Palestinians have been ethnically cleansed from practically their entire country. Sephardic Jews (also Semites) have been persecuted to the point of genocide (see article here). Orthodox Jews stand in direct opposition to the Sabbatean devils who run Israel. Torah Jews are becoming ever more vocal in their opposition to the perverse Talmud and its Satanic product, Qabbalah. The real Jews of the Biblical age moved into Europe, or remained in the Middle East as the first Christians. Some did not accept Christ's divinity but still remained part of the Jewish family by refusing to follow the Rabbis and their evil Talmud. Those who accepted Talmud were lost and cannot be considered Jews, but instead followers of a new anti-Yahweh religion - which can interchangeably be called Talmudic, Luciferian or Satanic.
Perhaps in the end, the establishment of Israel will prove to be positive for humanity. The Satanic Sabbateans have been able to hide behind organised Jewry with impunity, knowing that should their evil deeds become public knowledge, it is religious Jews who will take the fall. Gentile victims of Sabbatean child sacrifice have been defended for too long by Jews who have been whipped into hysteria by their leaders - and those who have died in the resulting pogroms have been sacrificed so the real monsters could go free. Rabbis have led the Jewish people into idolatry (self-worship, materialism) but now are openly opposed. Perhaps we will yet see the end of the Synagogue of Satan and the rehabilitation of those who misguidedly were a part of it.
Zionists, Talmudists, Qabbalists and Sabbateans are not Jews. These are the creatures behind Israel, and internationalism. We must take care to focus our attention on the real enemy, and not continue to fall into their trap by attacking the scapegoats they hide behind.
Thursday, 10 June 2010
Israelis Wonder: Has the World Lost Its Mind?, by Yossi Klein Halevi at wsj.com: The outcry in Israel over the operation against the Gaza flotilla has cut across political lines. Yet unlike the outrage being expressed abroad, the concern here is over tactics, not morality. "It's not enough to be right," wrote one liberal columnist in the daily Ma'ariv, "one also needs to be smart." The assumption that Israel was right to stop the flotilla—and right to maintain its siege on Hamas-led Gaza—is largely a given here.
The "dissonant moral languages" problem is that the "the world" is talking morals while the Israelis (and their cheerleaders abroad) are talking tactics.
Israel and the rest of the world seem to be speaking dissonant moral languages. How, Israelis wonder, can pro-Hamas activists wielding knives be confused for peace ...
The derangement of the world, by Melanie Phillips. Her "key point": The treatment being meted out to Israel is qualitatively and quantitatively different from the treatment meted out to any other nation. Ever. It's not just that the tyrannies of the present are not even reported on, let alone seen as a worthy and legitimate target of protest. Even the great progressive causes of the past, such as the campaign against apartheid South Africa, for example, never provoked such hysterical obsession, let alone such a sustained and frenzied onslaught of lie after distortion after fabrication after blood libel. Just like the Jew-hatred of the past, the characteristics of this victimisation are unique; just like the Jew-hatred of the past, it treats the Jewish people as some kind of cosmic evil; and just like the Jew-hatred of the past, ultimately it simply defies explanation. But it is happening, right now, before our disbelieving eyes; it is quite simply a derangement of the world.
According to Phillips, the international campaign against South Africa was "great", but the toothless disapproval of Israel is "hysterical obsession", "a sustained and frenzied onslaught of lie after distortion after fabrication after blood libel", "just like the Jew-hatred of the past" (repeated three times).
Right after Phillips insists the contrast between South Africa and Israel "simply defies explanation" she claims the explanation is "simply a derangement of the world". A more plausible explanation is that Phillips is deranged. She treats jews as some kind of cosmic victims of unique hatred. An even more plausible explanation is that Phillips is perfectly sane. She's just hysterically guilt-tripping "the world" about "jew-hate" because she knows that this tactic has worked for jews many times in the past.
For some people it is indeed simple - crazy "jew-hate" explains everything. It's a liberating idea. It justifies any jewish behavior whatsoever.
Just Torpedo The Next Flotilla, by Jonathan Mark at The Jewish Week: The beauty of the almost unanimous international condemnation of Israel for attempting to stop the terrorist flotilla like gentlemen -- using paint guns? -- instead of using serious military force, should send a message to Jews: You can't win by being polite to terrorists who have a schoolyard bully mentality. Weakness brings out even more outrageous behavior in bullies.
Next flotilla that violently resists a search -- just sink it. Torpedo it. See how many more flotillas follow. The condemnation won't be any different. Better that than even one more Jew being injured while boarding these floating Jenins.
Few events in recent decades have illuminated the complete hypocrisy of the world. There is nothing that Israel can do or could have done that would stop the next diplomatic ambush. So start acting tough.By Israel fighting as if their lives actually depended on it -- which it does -- Israel will, in fact, be taken more seriously by the international scholyard bullies. Bring back the "fear factor." It is the reason why in 1980 Iran released the hostages when Reagan became president, and not during Carter's presidency, because Carter was rightly seen by the Iranians as a wimp and Reagan was feared as a trigger-happy cowboy.
Here Mark is rationalizing bank robbery and torpedoing civilian ships, slinging "blood libels" at Europeans, and he thinks the problem is "the complete hypocrisy of the world".
We are no longer in the general Euopean anti-Semitism mode but deeper into the new run-up (in the Arab mind) to the Final Solution -- the extermination of Israel. In old Germany, a Jew sitting on an Aryan park bench was as much of a criminal as a Jew who robs a bank. So we might as well rob the bank. We might as well take out Iran as take out the flotilla.
The Other Side is fearless now. If someone is going to fear anyone, make the bad guys fear Israel. Right now, too many Jews fear the world. Turn the tables. Make the bad guys think that Israel is craziest S.O.B. in the room. Make everyone wonder what the Jews will do. The world will be furious? Imagine that. Imagine winning.
Labels: israel, jonathan mark, melanie phillips, yossi klein halevi






