|
|---|
Friday, 17 April 2009
Are you feeling marginalized, cheated, or otherwise oppressed? Disturbed by abortion? Angry about the current economic and political climate? Upset about millions of illegal immigrants our government won't arrest or deport? If you said yes to any of these questions and you're White then be advised that the Department of Homeland Security considers you a potential enemy of the state.
Rightwing Extremism: Current Economic and Political Climate Fueling Resurgence in Radicalization and Recruitment (via Washington Times):The DHS/Office of Intelligence and Analysis (I&A) has no specific information that domestic rightwing* terrorists are currently planning acts of violence, but rightwing extremists may be gaining new recruits by playing on their fears about several emergent issues. The economic downturn and the election of the first African American president present unique drivers for rightwing radicalization and recruitment.
Rightwing extremists have capitalized on the election of the first African American president, and are focusing their efforts to recruit new members, mobilize existing supporters, and broaden their scope and appeal through propaganda, but they have not yet turned to attack planning.
Note that "rightwing extremists" are being accused of reacting to actual facts and events, while the writers of this report are the ones "playing on fears". This report is a perfect example of propaganda. It not only demonizes an opposing cause, it does so by inverting reality.* Rightwing extremism in the United States can be broadly divided into those groups, movements, and adherents that are primarily hate-oriented (based on hatred of particular religious, racial or ethnic groups), and those that are mainly antigovernment, rejecting federal authority in favor of state or local authority, or rejecting government authority entirely. It may include groups and individuals that are dedicated to a single issue, such as opposition to abortion or immigration.
This is the footnote many media reports have focused on.
Note that the hate rhetoric is another inversion. The effect of this report, if not its desired purpose, is to fuel ill will towards Whites who are reacting to what we perceive as aggression and dispossession.
The "rightwing extremist" and "white supremacist" smears used to describe the disparate and well-intentioned people who favor state or local authority or oppose abortion or immigration reveals the report writers' hypocritical hatred of even the weakest and most disjoint expressions of racial/religious self-interest from a particular racial/religious group: White Christians.
The report specifically targets and deliberately pathologizes Whites who are disturbed by anything we consider harmful to our interests.Proposed imposition of firearms restrictions and weapons bans likely would attract new members into the ranks of rightwing extremist groups, as well as potentially spur some of them to begin planning and training for violence against the government. The high volume of purchases and stockpiling of weapons and ammunition by rightwing extremists in anticipation of restrictions and bans in some parts of the country continue to be a primary concern to law enforcement.
The founders of our country clearly trusted in and recognized the value of a well-armed citizenry and unambiguously expressed these beliefs in the 2nd amendment. Those who propose the imposition of firearms restrictions and weapons bans without amending the constitution are the extremists.A recent example of the potential violence associated with a rise in rightwing extremism may be found in the shooting deaths of three police officers in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, on 4 April 2009. The alleged gunman’s reaction reportedly was influenced by his racist ideology and belief in antigovernment conspiracy theories related to gun confiscations, citizen detention camps, and a Jewish-controlled “one world government.”
Note that this report is not only specifically antagonistic toward Whites acting in our own defense, it is also specifically sympathetic to jews.Rightwing extremist chatter on the Internet continues to focus on the economy, the perceived loss of U.S. jobs in the manufacturing and construction sectors, and home foreclosures. Anti-Semitic extremists attribute these losses to a deliberate conspiracy conducted by a cabal of Jewish “financial elites.” These “accusatory” tactics are employed to draw new recruits into rightwing extremist groups and further radicalize those already subscribing to extremist beliefs. DHS/I&A assesses this trend is likely to accelerate if the economy is perceived to worsen.
The chain of causation is reversed. The very real foreclosures and loss of jobs fuels the perceived disastrous costs of the globalist, materialist, consumerist pyramid scheme euphemistically referred to as "the economy".
The writers of this report are so keen to protect "financial elites" (and specifically jews) who have perpetrated fraud that they use the very accusatory tactics they decry to direct blame and hate instead onto what they imagine is deliberate conspiracy conducted by a cabal of admittedly powerless "rightwing extremist groups".Rightwing extremists are harnessing this historical election as a recruitment tool. Many rightwing extremists are antagonistic toward the new presidential administration and its perceived stance on a range of issues, including immigration and citizenship, the expansion of social programs to minorities, and restrictions on firearms ownership and use. Rightwing extremists are increasingly galvanized by these concerns and leverage them as drivers for recruitment. From the 2008 election timeframe to the present, rightwing extremists have capitalized on related racial and political prejudices in expanded propaganda campaigns, thereby reaching out to a wider audience of potential sympathizers.
Once again the word "perceived" marks an inversion.
Whites were the most evenly split racial group in the presidential election. The more lopsided votes of every other group are justifiably understood to reflect antagonism toward Whites because the new presidential administration's support for immigration is in fact reducing Whites to a minority. The new presidential administration has and continues to capitalize on related racial and political prejudices against Whites - this report being a prime example.Paralleling the current national climate, rightwing extremists during the 1990s exploited a variety of social issues and political themes to increase group visibility and recruit new members. Prominent among these themes were the militia movement’s opposition to gun control efforts, criticism of free trade agreements (particularly those with Mexico), and highlighting perceived government infringement on civil liberties as well as white supremacists’ longstanding exploitation of social issues such as abortion, inter-racial crimes, and same-sex marriage. During the 1990s, these issues contributed to the growth in the number of domestic rightwing terrorist and extremist groups and an increase in violent acts targeting government facilities, law enforcement officers, banks, and infrastructure sectors.
Here's how "longstanding exploitation" works.
Some Whites recognize and complain about the unrelenting assault on our social and political interests and try to defend them. In this defense we constantly face smooth-talking dishonest aggressors just like the people who wrote this DHS report. This fills some Whites with frustration and despair, and they react violently. Then we're all smeared as "extremists" and the violent reactions are exploited, even decades later, to justify and continue the assault against us. This report again provides a prime example. In seven pages of text Timothy McVeigh and the Oklahoma City bombing are mentioned three times.Historically, domestic rightwing extremists have feared, predicted, and anticipated a cataclysmic economic collapse in the United States. Prominent antigovernment conspiracy theorists have incorporated aspects of an impending economic collapse to intensify fear and paranoia among like-minded individuals and to attract recruits during times of economic uncertainty. Conspiracy theories involving declarations of martial law, impending civil strife or racial conflict, suspension of the U.S. Constitution, and the creation of citizen detention camps often incorporate aspects of a failed economy. Antigovernment conspiracy theories and “end times” prophecies could motivate extremist individuals and groups to stockpile food, ammunition, and weapons. These teachings also have been linked with the radicalization of domestic extremist individuals and groups in the past, such as violent Christian Identity organizations and extremist members of the militia movement.
Over the past five years, various rightwing extremists, including militias and white supremacists, have adopted the immigration issue as a call to action, rallying point, and recruiting tool. Debates over appropriate immigration levels and enforcement policy generally fall within the realm of protected political speech under the First Amendment, but in some cases, anti-immigration or strident pro-enforcement fervor has been directed against specific groups and has the potential to turn violent.
The constitution describes the political structure of a government. The fear that this structure has been subverted and illegitimately replaced with what amounts to a new kind of government is based on the very real evidence (the report we're examining here for example) that the current government and its defense is based primarily on economics. In addition, the writers of this report are clearly antipathetic to the constitutional principles codified in the 1st and 2nd amendments. Their strident fervor is directed specifically against Whites who would defend and uphold the constitution.Rightwing extremist paranoia of foreign regimes could escalate or be magnified in the event of an economic crisis or military confrontation, harkening back to the “New World Order” conspiracy theories of the 1990s.
The report writers seem to resent that theories with predictive value are naturally magnified. They present no evidence to substantiate their paranoid theories concerning "rightwing extremist paranoia of foreign regimes". The bulk of their report makes the case that "rightwing extremists" are most concerned about the domestic regime.— (U//LES) DHS/I&A has concluded that white supremacist lone wolves pose the most significant domestic terrorist threat because of their low profile and autonomy—separate from any formalized group—which hampers warning efforts.
Note that the biggest threat they perceive to the deliberately organized and government-supported demonization, disarming, and dispossession of Whites is the disorganized resistance of individual Whites acting independently. The moral: native Whites who conclude that our current government is acting against our interests are by this very act justifying the government to work that much harder against us. Regardless of what they might think or do however, immigrants and financial elites can rest assured that the government is actively defending their interests.
— (U//FOUO) Similarly, recent state and municipal law enforcement reporting has warned of the dangers of rightwing extremists embracing the tactics of “leaderless resistance” and of lone wolves carrying out acts of violence.A prominent civil rights organization reported in 2006 that “large numbers of potentially violent neo-Nazis, skinheads, and other white supremacists are now learning the art of warfare in the [U.S.] armed forces.”
The "prominent civil rights organization" is not specified, but the source of the quote indicates that it is actually an anti-White-rights group.
Racist Extremists Active in U.S. Military - SPLC urges Rumsfeld to adopt zero-tolerance policy:Southern Poverty Law Center President Richard Cohen urged Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld to adopt a zero-tolerance policy regarding racist extremism among members of the U.S. military.
Zero tolerance for Whites pretty much sums up the hate-oriented nature of the domestic terrorists who have insinuated themselves and their anti-White ideas into the very highest levels of our government.
"Because hate group membership and extremist activity are antithetical to the values and mission of our armed forces, we urge you to adopt a zero-tolerance policy when it comes to white supremacy in the military and to take all necessary steps to ensure that the policy is rigorously enforced," Cohen wrote in a letter to Rumsfeld.
Military extremists present an elevated threat both to their fellow soldiers and the general public. Today's white supremacists become tomorrow's domestic terrorists.
I boarded my train and waited for it to depart for Pixiechester. Along came the ticket inspector - a bright crimson coloured entity who spoke in clicks and bleeps. It took all my efforts to work out what he was saying. I would have asked one of the other beings in the carriage to translate but alas, amongst the multitude of diverse beings from every imaginable dimension and space-time zone, not one shared the same tonal wavescale as the inspector, nor was a single human in sight aboard.
The train arrived at Pixadilly Station where I disembarked. Heading out towards the City Centre I passed rows of non-humans begging for cash to spend on poppy essence. This was much the same as back in Cruddersfield. The only difference was that the non-humans here were more persistent in their begging ways, and to my horror a good many humans were also lining the streets with their hands outstretched begging for poppy-buying cash.
I thought back to happier times before the Reptilian Shape-shifters had completely taken over the Government. In those days, the gateway to the other dimensions had remained closed, and the only people one would come across were actually humans who spoke with the same words and had the same cultures. Certainly there were differences from area to area, but at least we were all of a common source. As I pondered this, the grey from Cruddersfield emerged from the Station, having climbed aboard the same train as myself.
My plan had worked! Unbeknownst to the grey and the rat-dæmon, I knew that the area adjacent to Pixadilly was a portal to the hell realm, from whence the rat-dæmon had come. Carefully invoking Alocer, the Guardian of the Seventh Gate to open the portal, I side-stepped the grey and its companion who were sucked through the portal to a dimension from which not even their reptoid masters could retrieve them.
A job well done, I returned to Cruddersfield to see which other beings I could lure to the portal in Pixichester, the City of the Damned. But that, as they say, is another story...
Wednesday, 15 April 2009
Open letter to the National Front (11.7.8)
I write this with a degree of sadness. I strongly believe in Nationalist Unity and have up to this point refrained from commenting adversely on any organisation that belongs to the Nationalist family. However, I feel that I can no longer remain silent with regards to the National Front. I have remained silent in spite of the National Front proscribing the British People’s Party. This proscription was an act of spite, coming from the jealousy of the National Front for the British People’s Party being stronger numerically and ideologically. This pettiness is indicative of a profound malaise at the heart of the National Front.
....I do not believe in the proscribing of any legal organisation. Certainly, taking steps to ensure that members do not fraternise with terrorists (IRA, UVF) and Police honey traps (C18), is vital. No serious organisation can tolerate those who advocate violence. The BPP wholeheartedly opposed terrorism. If it had been any other away, I would not have given the BPP my support.
The National Front is an organisation with an impressive history. In the 1970s it was a serious force in British politics. Had the Conservative Party not cynically stolen the NF’s policies, life in this country may well have been much better than it is today. The developments in the 1980s that led to Third Positionism becoming an important aspect of Nationalist thought also deserve much praise. Unfortunately these advances tend to be forgotten due to the personality clashes and schisms that resulted. They remain praiseworthy nonetheless.
The National Front of today is not even a shadow of its former self. It has neither the physical impact of the original Front nor the spiritual and moral ideological presence of the Political Soldier stage of the NF. Both stages of the NF were impressive, the latter even more so than the former for the continuing influence of the radical ideas the NF infused into the greater Nationalist movement.
Such have been the splits and regroupings that aside from the name, the current NF has virtually nothing in common with the great party whose name the modern pretenders have usurped. It is a shame that the name ‘National Front’ has not been given a decent burial so it may be remembered with respect as the inspiration to generations of Nationalists. By continuing to use the NF name, the current grouping is tarring that memory. The Beatles are remembered as a band which had a significant impact on popular culture (for good or ill is a matter of debate!) Their strength is in part due to knowing when to quit on a high, the Rolling Stones lamentably stumbled on and lost their way. Such is the situation with the NF today.
....Whilst I still stand by my point that the NF name should have been dropped in order to preserve it as an inspiration, we find ourselves in a situation where nostalgia is a luxury we cannot afford. The NF continues, and it offers an organisational platform for driving the opposition to Globalism which is destroying every nation of the world. We need organised groups to fight the New World Order. The NF is one such group. We could get involved in romantic reminiscing for the movement that was, but it would do none of us any good. The group exists, and as such provides a vehicle for exposing the despotism of Westminster and Bruxelles. History is important, but the present is where we must fight if we are to have any chance of securing a viable future for our people.
On Thursday, 10th July, the group that calls itself the National Front stood in the Haltemprice and Howden by-election. They never stood a chance in this Conservative stronghold. The result they achieved is an embarrassment. The National Front came 4th, behind the Conservatives who won with 71.6% of the vote (17,113 votes), the Greens (7.4%, 1,758 votes) and the English Democrats (7.2%, 1,174 votes).
The National Front achieved a pathetic 2.3% of the vote – a mere 544 votes, losing their deposit. They only managed to get 23 more votes than Gemma Garrett (Miss Great Britain Party). The fact that the English Democrats trounced the NF shows just how out of touch with the electorate these pseudo-political dinosaurs are. If the NF had not stood, the English Democrats would have come in second and denied the internationalist Greens second place. The NF standing was a disaster all round.
It is a shame that Tess Culnane allowed herself to be involved in this farce. Tess is a lady for whom there is great esteem in the nationalist community. She did not need to stand in the election to prove her worth and decency – she has already done that.
....Not long after the ill-conceived election campaign, Tess Culnane left the NF due to the refusal of the old leadership to face up to the realities of political life in the Police State which is twentyfirst century Britain. It is to the shame of the immovable dinosaurs who misled the NF into the July 2008 election, that they treated Tess in such a deplorable manner. The rank and file, and Tess Culnane, are to be applauded for the effort they put into the campaign. However, the leadership should not have been so short sighted as to have pushed this petty political ploy.
The tactic of standing against David Davis in order to gain publicity was pure publicity seeking opportunism. It was wholly unprincipled. The National Front had no chance of even saving their deposit in the Haltemprice and Howden by-election. By standing they sent out a message that they oppose an honourable politician (now how often does one of those appear?) in his campaign to stop the Government grabbing the obscenely draconian power to hold suspects for 42 days without charge.
The Stalinist policy of the Brown regime is a threat to everyone - Do the National Front believe they are immune to this evil? History shows that Nationalists will suffer as much as, if not more than everyone else. David Davis stood for the sole purpose of raising awareness of the dictatorial nature of the government’s policy of detaining anyone they wish to, without trial and without reason, for 42 hours.
Tess Culnane stated that she wished to broaden the debate to cover the reasons for the current terrorist attacks, covering issues such as immigration and the wars in Iraq, Afghanistan, and Occupied Palestine etc. These are important factors, which need addressing. However, the Haltemprice and Howden by-election was not an appropriate arena for this. The 42-hour detention issue is so important that no distraction should be indulged in. Tess is a lady with convictions. Sadly the National Front leadership have taken advantage of Tess. They have proven themselves to be inappropriately opportunistic. Our complaint is not against Tess or the decent hardworking members of the National Front (and other individuals) who campaigned for her, far from it, these people acted honourably. Our objection is with the leadership of the National Front who chose to indulge in petty politics to the detriment of us all.
....I absolutely 100% stand by this statement. Fighting an unwinnable election at great expense, against a candidate who was at least discussing the tyranny of the State (albeit as a lackey of the same establishment he feigned to oppose), was in my opinion a huge error in judgement.
The NF is run by amateurs who seem incapable of formulating a coherent political strategy. The lack of direction has been apparent for some time, but this year this has palpably worsened. We have witnessed marches of around twenty people, which have served only to show the weakness of the Front and have been easy target for the opposition. We have seen failure to expel a member for proven pædophilia. We have seen tolerance of members who espouse terrorism. We have seen participation in an election that has sent out a message of support for the Brown regime and resulted in the vote received being an embarrassment. This is not all - I could go on.
....Again, I stand resolutely behind this statement. Marches of tiny bands of activists only serve to display weakness. Failing to expel pædophile scum Martyn Gilleard was an affront to decency. For this, the leadership of the time should hang their heads in shame. Ordinary members are not to blame for this lack of action by the higher echelons. It is to be hoped that the shame brought on the party will be remembered should the old leadership call on the support of the rank and file who they dishonoured with this failure to uphold the good name of the party.
This letter is an appeal to the ordinary members of the National Front who do not indulge in fantasies of armed struggle – to the vast majority. Anyone who lives under the illusion that terrorism can achieve anything other than to give the State an excuse to take away even more of our freedoms is not welcome in our ranks. This is an appeal to the decent Nationalists in the National Front, including those in the leadership who can see beyond the idea of being a big fish in a tiny murky puddle, to see that the time has come to accept that the National Front has had its day. The time has come to consign the National Front to history, to remember it with fondness and to move on.
....As I’ve written above, we are now in such a dire situation, with the imminent imposition of the European Constitution through the bogus Lisbon Treaty, that we have to fight with very legal weapon at our disposal. It matters not one jot if the NF name is dropped, and in the time lost, the slim chance of defeating the completion of the Soviet European Union, is lost. If we do not stop the shift from the current EU to the Fabian wet dream of the Communitarian Superstate, then all hope is lost. It is as simple as that.
The National Front is a Royalist Party. The Monarchy of this country is directly responsible for the unprecedented betrayal of the indigenous population and associated kinfolk. Under the First Queen Elizabeth, ordinary people (including children) were press-ganged into the Queens Navy. They were enslaved to make the Royals rich. The Royal Family claim the ‘divine right’ to rule over us. This blasphemy comes from King James who ordered the rewriting of the English translation of the Bible to give him non-existent God-given authority. This tyrant is the man who planted the Protestant Scots in Ulster. These Scots became the Loyalists who the NF supports in the ongoing sectarian warfare. We do not support the IRA – we do not support anyone who encourages intra-ethnic warfare, however we do appreciate that the Loyalists are the descendants of people who were not originally native to Ulster. This ethnic difference, with its most noticeable expression in terms of religious variation does not merit conflict – from either faction. Both Orange and Green Nationalists need to see the bigger picture. The outcome of sectarian warfare is the ultimate demise of all, to the benefit of people who have no kinship whatsoever with the folk of the British Isles.
The internationalist agenda of the burgeoning New World Order has been pushed relentlessly by the British Monarchy. It was the Royal Family who encouraged General Kitchener in his policy of murdering farmers and their families in Southern Africa. The tyrannical Queen Victoria presided over the invention of Concentration Camps, the burning of Pretoria, the rape and murder of entire Boer families – men, women, children and babies – all for the pursuit of increasing her despotic family’s wealth. The wholesale slaughter of civilians continued with the destruction of Dresden, Hamburg and other cities. The present Queen rewarded Rudi Giuliani for his part in the murderous attacks on the New York World Trade Centre. The present wars for oil and empire in the Middle East. Asia and elsewhere all fit the Globalist agenda which the Royals not only support, but revel in. The NF supports these imperialist criminals. The BPP feel that there is no justification for the British people giving their loyalty to a family who have been demonstrably disloyal to the people of the nation they purport to serve.
....Again, I stand by this statement. The Monarchy are the smiling face of our financial, social and cultural enemy. The NF must drop all support for these monsters. I hope that by working with the NF, I can expose the Royal Family for the murderers, rapists, and all round Satanic usurious vermin that they are. This may offend some people, but those who tug their forelocks and sing ‘God Save the Queen’ need to be woken up to see the reality that those they misguidedly genuflect to, are the vilest, sickest family on the planet.
All decent members of the NF, from top to bottom, who genuinely believe in putting the interests of our Nation and People before all other matters, are welcome to come to the BPP. Ours is a movement of principles.
Our movement does not indulge in petty politics but sees the bigger picture. We will not contest elections as a reaction to the political wind. We will certainly not oppose those whose ideals we share!
....I would question the principles of the BPP and the commitment to not indulge in petty politics: What else would one call mischievously publishing an article I wrote 9 months ago? Perhaps where I wrote ‘We will certainly not oppose those whose ideals we share’, I should have written ‘I’ in place of ‘We’.
We will not put our people in danger by going on marches in inadequate numbers. We do not say that we will never have marches – we may, when our numbers are sufficient to send out a message that we are strong. That time will come.
....This commitment was abandoned when the BPP held a demo against racist rap music. Whilst I applaud the initiative, the fact is that BPP personnel were put at risk. On a positive note, the hypocrisy of AFA/ACF & ANaL/SWP was exposed, with their much-vaunted anti-racism shown to be a complete sham.
We will never tolerate pædophiles in our ranks. Our movement is a family in which comradeship matters. We have a support network unrivalled in the broader Nationalist movement.
We fight for all our people, not just for a particular religious faction. We reject the sectarianism of the National Front. It is ludicrous for people of European stock to be killing one another over matters such as whether divorce is or isn’t allowed, whilst all the time we are losing our territory to outsiders. This if even less tolerable when one considers that the sectarian factions (Sinn Fein, Orange Order etc) embrace the very multiculturalism that is destroying our lands.
....The anti-Sectarian stance of the BPP has been eroded since this article was written, with badges being sold in support of Loyalist paramilitaries. I personally oppose all terrorists operating in or from the North of Ireland. They are all, trained, funded and often staffed by British Military Intelligence (MI5). Doubtless there will be some members of the NF who support these agents of British tyranny, and they will need to be educated to awareness of how they are being hoodwinked into supporting their enemies, else kicked out for the agents provocateur and idiots they must otherwise be. However, in the light of BPP leaders selling terrorist fund-raising material, this naïvety pales into near insignificance.
The NF is imperialist, sectarian, royalist and rooted in the dark history of a past we need to overcome. People who support this agenda have no part in the Nationalist movement. The NF has no part in the Nationalist movement.
....So long as the NF aids in the fight against the Global prison, then it is a useful part of the struggle. Its Imperialist, Royalist, Sectarian past is a major problem, which must be dealt with. Right now, however, it is urgent that all opponents of the New World Order march against this peril. I would go so far as to say that we should be encouraging the rank and file of groups such as UKIP and the BNP in fighting the EU totalitarian superstate.
The time has come to join a movement rooted in the present, which looks to the future. The past is gone forever – remember it but don’t try to recreate it. Join the movement, which can and will, make a real difference!
....If I was writing this article now, I would say that the time has come to get involved with any and all movements which oppose the rapid move to a Global Superstate. It is certainly not the time for poaching members to boost membership lists. Parties must now be seen as regiments in the battle against the common enemy, and not as part of the Westminster circus. To that end, we must be steering each and every organisation we can in this battle for national and cultural life and death. If you think that winning seats in Parliament will make any difference, then you may as well join one of the Parties who are already in Parliament and feed from the rotting carcass of your nation, alongside the willing servants of the establishment.
Monday, 6 April 2009
However, the 'Environmentalism' being preached by the likes of Al Gore, is not about caring for the planet. Sustainability is a propaganda technique to brainwash us into falling for the lie of man-made climate change. The climate is changing - it always has done so, regardless of human activity. What is the cause then? In a nutshell, the temperature of the Earth is regulated by the Sun. Increased Solar activity results in increased Earth temperature. For that matter, the other planets are influenced in the same manner. Mars, Uranus, Saturn and the rest are also experiencing 'Global Warming', but I don't think we can blame 4 by 4 drivers for that!
Why then the constant propaganda saying that ordinary people are killing the planet? Why the silencing of Science which exposes the Man-made Global Warming fraud? Why? To justify a Global tax, administered by a Global Government, enforced by a Global Police and Army. What better way to ensure compliance with the new Global Superstate than to create a new Religion for the masses to blindly follow?
Religion has long been a means of manipulating the people into serving their rulers. Fear of the big daddy in the sky watching everyone and damning all transgressors (of Priestly/State laws) to eternal suffering amid fire and brimstone, no longer works. Fear of unprovable environmental destruction is the new bogeyman to beat the masses into obedience. It is the new 'Faith' for the New World Order.
..Thanks to 'la bella senorina' for questioning this new dogma, and being a heretic swimming against the sea of political correctness - you know who you are!
Sunday, 5 April 2009
Lawrence Auster's latest fruitloopery - the "rebuttable presumption", a term he introduces in the course of smearing Pat Buchanan:The obvious explanation is animus against Jews. Let's call it a rebuttable presumption. If Buchanan and others want to rebut it, let them do so.
Let's call it a new name for a very old, very jewish tactic. The mechanics are simple. They cry "hate", and you waste your time protesting that it's not true. Or not. Either way the subject has been changed, you've been smeared, and anyone who might come to your defense knows they will be treated likewise.
A few days later an acolyte troubled The Fruitloopy One with an impertinent question. Must my analysis of Buchanan be applied to the Jews?Is it a rebuttable presumption that any organized Jewish attacks on conservative Christian politicians in the West (America, Western Europe) are motivated by an animus against gentiles? I was under the impression that you attributed Jewish animus towards conservative America as being motivated by their utopian liberalism.
Note how the power of fruitloopery so effortlessly transforms "organized Jewish attacks on conservative Christian politicians in the West" into "The Jews".
"No, no, no", protests The Fruity One. "The Jews are compleeeeeetely different. It's not at all valid to take a standard or line of reasoning I've concocted for The Someone Elses and apply it to someone else I wasn't thinking of. I used "rebuttable presumption" to defend The Jews. You can't take it and use it against The Jews. That's just not right. But it sure does remind me of the time another person tried to apply my logic about The Blacks and The Muslims to The Jews."
That would be Auster's First Law of Majority/Minority Relations in Liberal Society, whereby The Loopster freely generalizes about groups qua groups:The more egregiously any non-Western or non-white group behaves, the more evil whites are made to appear for noticing and drawing rational conclusions about that group's bad behavior.
Does this not fit Whites whom have noticed and drawn rational conclusions about the jewish group's bad behavior? "Not fair", scolds His Loopiness, "I only intended My Law (it's mine, you can't use it) to apply to the under-achievement and dysfunction of The Blacks and The Muslims, not the border-opening, financial-fraud-creating, minority-under-achievement-and-dysfunction-celebrating, free-speech-snuffing over-achievements of The Jews!"
- - -
In Explaining the anti-Semites' psychology Fructus Maximus Loopus tries to gyrate his way out of answering for his serial intellectual gyrations. He actually places special emphasis on stating, without rebutting, a "rebuttable presumption" he sees aimed at himself:by the very fact of speaking in defense of white people and white society, what I am really doing is advancing the false and pernicious belief that Jews are on the side of whites. What I am really up to is helping Jews get accepted by whites as part of the white race
He has pondered this before. If he wants to rebut it, let him do so.
It is Mr. F. Loop's preoccupation with israel and "anti-semites" that reveals what he is really up to. That and his "defense of white people" which includes blaming us for suiciding ourselves, and admonishing us to fix all of the West's problems by reasserting ourselves. * In pursuing their own interests jews have led the pathologization of White racialism for more than a hundred years. They proudly led the long march of the cultural marxists through our institutions, inverting and/or obliterating our societal norms to soothe their undying alienation. But we don't need Abe Foxman or Morris Dees to "defend" us from such truths. Ever-ready friends like the Fruitinator will gladly do it for them. That's how much he cares about us "white people".
Of course, like so many of the other famous white people defenders throughout history - selfless, censorious men like Ian Jobling - Rooty Tooty Fresh n'Fruity permits himself to distinguish between jewish and non-jewish whites. He is first and foremost pro-jew. In his defense of white people however he will not tolerate anyone who would distinguish between jew and non-jew who is first and foremost non-jew.
- - -
So here's another "rebuttable presumption" for Loopenstein. He wrote in The cause of the white race will not go away:when I consider today's systematic campaign, organized and backed by all the ruling powers of society, to put down, demonize, disempower, and marginalize the white race, I think it is shaping up as the greatest crime in the history of mankind
I don't belive he actually believes this. Fruitby Doo, if you believe this, then when will you call for the arrest and prosecution of the criminals who are responsible? Not "The Jews" Loopadoop - but those jews responsible for this crime you say you've noticed, along with everyone else who is responsible. No, of course you won't. Your "defense of white people" ends where jewish culpability begins.
* Here's the usual Toucan Sam "defense of white people":But never forget: blacks keep indulging in such appalling behavior, decade after decade, because white America keeps giving them the moral sanction to do so--because in the 1960s whites out of a misplaced sense of racial guilt gave up their moral legitimacy and their moral leadership in this country. From which it follows that a decent social and racial order can be only restored in America if whites resume their position of leadership.
"Never forget - Whites are to blame for black behavior." What would we do without such inspired defense? How would we ever set aside our misplaced sense of racial guilt without Austard's guilt-tripping us into it?
Friday, 3 April 2009
Yesterday saw the G-20 Circus arrive in London. The Summit was really just a pantomime event; with real policy having been settled well in advance. The ludicrous official story the media would have us believe, is that elected officials from the G-20 nations met to thrash out economic policy to deal with the global economic crisis, and reached a consensus all could agree on in just a single day. There were no clashes with regards to differences in National interests and no quibbling over monetary input. That really is an insult to our intelligence.
Personality Trivia
The media focussed on how every woman in Great Britain wants to look like the US President’s wife, Michelle Obama. I haven’t met anyone who was asked, or knows anyone who was asked, what they think of Obama’s dress sense! Frankly, with the ever-spiralling cost of living, no one cares. But according to the media, the entire nation is obsessed with this non-issue.
What other vital information did the British media impart to the people? Well, we were told that Jamie Oliver catered from the Vile Irrelevant Parasites (VIPs), that Michelle Obama (the media’s darling) hugged the Queen and that US President Obama prostrated himself before the Queen in a manner which all thinking Americans would find horrific, and all thinking Britons would find embarrassing (servile arse-licking impresses no one in Britain).
Here are just two of Obama’s nauseating grovelling statements:
“I think in the imagination of people throughout America, I think what the Queen stands for and her decency and her civility, what she represents, that's very important… There’s one last thing that I should mention that I love about Great Britain, and that is the Queen.”
The Queen stands for all that is wrong with Britain. To taody to this monster is absolutety disgraceful – and this from the President of a nation which fought for independence from the tyrannical Monarchy, is just unbelievable.
With all the attention focussed by the media on the new Washington DC puppet, one would be forgiven for thinking Obama was the ruler of Great Britain rather than a foreign Head of State. The way the Westminster regime sucked up to the US President was even more sickening than the way Tony Blair made himself a poodle of George Bush.
Orchestrated Violence
Away from the fawning over politicians and their entourage, the media took great delight in putting the spotlight on the poor hard done by Police who had to bravely defend private property from hordes of rioting scum.
The media focussed on the Anarchist Black Bloc, or as those who haven’t been poisoned by the propaganda machine call them, undercover Police / special Army units. But, to play along with the media færy tale, the Police did a stalwart job preventing massive destruction by marauding hooligans. They had to detain a few innocent people, but all in all they were magnificent!
The truth is somewhat different. The Black Bloc were allowed by their uniformed colleagues to do some superficial damage to a Royal Bank of Scotland building, at the precise moment a team of journalists had assembled there. How very fortunate indeed! The TV broadcasts showed masked Anarchists attacking a symbol of Capitalism. This obviously contrived event was reminiscent of the Battle of Orgreave in South Yorkshire in 1984.
Same agenda, Same tactics
For those who are unaware of the Battle of Orgreave, it marked a low point for the British media. In a nutshell, British miners were fighting for the existence of their industry, against the Thatcher regime, which was hell, bent of crippling all British Industry so the nation could never again be self-sufficient, but would be enmeshed in the Globalist web of interdependence. The Establishment-serving media demonised the Miners as Communist troublemakers. In fact they were ordinary British Workers fighting for a living. Certainly there were Communist elements in the Unions, but they hardly represented the Workers themselves.
At Orgreave, the Police herded the Miners into a field and then led charge after charge on horseback into the corralled Miners. After inflicting very many and serious casualties on the Miners, they finally began defending themselves by throwing whatever could be found at the Police lines. The media then changed the order of the images so it appeared as if the Police had charged the Miners in response to being stoned by them. This outrageous media manipulation was aired on the BBC1, BBC2 and ITV News programmes (there were only three channels in Britain at the time).
The result? The masses of the British people became hostile to the demonised Miners, and supported the State crackdown. With the most powerful union in Britain smashed, the Government went on to destroy the entire manufacturing and production base of the nation and made Great Britain dependent on imports. This betrayal of sovereignty and destruction of Self-sufficiency was greatly eased by the media complicity is this heinous crime
The Battle of Orgreave
Casualties of G-20
The greatest casualty of G-20 is National Freedom. The Summit was used to push through a whole raft of Globalisation. Arch Globalists including Nicholas Sarkozy, Angela Merkel, Gordon Brown and Barack Obama vied with each other for who could commit the most treason against the people they purport to represent.
"This is the day that the world came together to fight back against the global recession, not with words but with a plan for global recovery and reform and with a clear timetable," stated Brown, "I think a new world order is emerging with the foundation of a new progressive era of international cooperation,"
As hailed in the Manchester Guardian, under the agreement, the G20 countries proposed:
• New reforms of the global banking system, including institutions such as hedge funds, and other parts of the so-called "shadow banking system" coming under global regulatory control for the first time
• Tighter regulation for credit rating agencies, to prevent conflicts of interest
• A list of tax havens to be published immediately, and sanctions to be deployed against countries that do not comply with anti-secrecy regulations
• Completion of the creation of international colleges of supervisors for national regulators
• An agreement to do whatever is necessary to promote growth in individual countries, allowing for the possibility of the further use of fiscal stimuli in the future
• The injection of an additional $1tn into the global economy through measures including a $500bn increase in the funding available to the IMF, an increase in the availability of money for developing countries through the IMF's "special drawing rights" to $250bn and a total of $250bn being set aside for trade assistance
• Reform of institutions such as the IMF to allow countries like China to have greater influence. Senior posts at the IMF and the World Bank will open to candidates from the developing world.
• Renewed commitment to the millennium development goals.
• $50bn for the world's poorest countries.
This is pure Globalism. This seemingly innocuos rhetoric translates as the centralisation of all the world’s financial institutions, the criminalisation of economic freedom, the abolition of National Sovereignty insofar as it will be illegal to resist the global financial apparatus, the elevation of the World Bank and IMF to positions of being the only authority to determine economic policy anywhere, and the completion of the Communist-Communitarian Global takeover via the specific inclusion of the Peoples Republic of China as an arbiter of power.
This Summit also acted as a smokescreen for the first phase of the introduction of internal passports within Great Britain. The massive publicity the Summit was given was used to quietly bury the requirement of people travelling between the British Mainland and any of the many islands, to carry ID and register their details with officials. Never in history has travel with the nation been regulated. The justification? The bogeyman of ‘terrorism’.
Another victim was the Ian Tomlinson who died on the street, surrounded by uniformed Police. It is possible that he died of natural circumstances. Of course the British Police would never murder anyone would they? Ask the relatives of Jean Charles de Menezes that. Or for that matter the relatives of the thousands murdered by the State in Northern Ireland by the ‘IRA’ (MI5)
G-20 was a very bad day for freedom. A very bad day indeed.
Wednesday, 1 April 2009
Tomorrow, the 2nd April 2009 will see representatives of the financial controllers of the world meet in London for the G-20 Summit. These representatives of Global Usury hide behind the façade of democracy, but the proof of how ‘democratic’ they are can be seen in the security measures they have put in place to keep the enraged public at bay.
The British Police, who are portrayed to the world as unarmed Bobbies, have over the years been transformed into the Brutish Police. Tomorrow will see them at their paramilitary worst. Rather than the fabled lovable Coppers who help little old ladies to cross the road, they will be more like the stuff of nightmares. The stereotypical image, which used to be the reality of British Policing, is sadly now pure fantasy. The Police now more closely resemble a mercenary army, enforcing tyrannical order not protecting the people they claim to serve.
According to the Times of London,
“SCOTLAND YARD is to deploy officers armed with 50,000-volt Taser stun guns to deal with violent demonstrators planning to disrupt this week’s G20 summit in London.
The centrepiece of the security plan will be hundreds of officers from the Metropolitan police territorial support group, who are routinely armed with speedcuffs, extended batons and CS gas spray…they will be supported by officers equipped with Tasers…“There will be an armed response vehicle element to this operation and [those officers] will be carrying Tasers,” said a spokeswoman…All police leave has been cancelled and 10,500 officers, including reinforcements from other forces, will be deployed in the biggest policing operation undertaken in London.“
For those unfamiliar with the Territorial Support Group, this branch of the Police was used in the 1980s to physically beat the Coal Miners, in order to destroy the Unions and the Coal mining industry in Great Britain. This was part of the Globalist agenda to destroy British self-sufficiency in manufacturing and production, thus making the country reliant on imports. Internationalism cannot tolerate Nationhood and Self-Sufficiency.
The G-20 Summit is just a stage in the process to a One World Government. The fact that so much Police manpower is being called in, alongside the vast private apparatus which is being employed, highlights that the Internationalist agenda is not yet complete. Protesters are also mobilising to campaign against the plutocratic depots of the G-20. That is a good thing isn’t it? Well, sadly, looking at the organisations massing in London, the answer is no.
According to the Times, Protest Groups include:
“London Anarchists: (who) have appealed for people to join in “direct action” similar to that seen at previous anti-globalisation protests
Whitechapel Anarchists: London group which praised the attack on the home of Sir Fred Goodwin, the disgraced bank boss
Class War: veteran anarchists who are encouraging supporters to “burn a banker”
G20 Meltdown: A new organisation which will host a carnival at the Bank of England
Climate Camp: environmentalists behind direct action at Heathrow airport and power stations in North Yorkshire and Kent
Climate Rush: group against airport expansion who have “rushed” parliament
People and Planet: student network campaigning to end world poverty, defend human rights and protect the environment
Stop the War Coalition and CND: anti-war protesters against Iraq and Afghanistan wars “
This collection of Environmentalists and Anarchists is actually a faux opposition. The Environmentalist Movement has been hijacked by Internationalists who are actually campaigning FOR a Global Tax to deal with Climate Change. They are pushing the lying propaganda of Al Gore and other Internationalist gangsters. Doubtelss many of them are sincere, but they are sincerely wrong!
The Anarchists in London are just there to cause mayhem. Most, if not all of the ‘leaders’ (sic) of these Anarchist Groups will be MI5 operatives. Class War in particular, are a group who, although they call themselves Anarchists, are really Anarcho-Communists, or to be more precise, well-to-do students playing at rebellion until such time as their Daddies gets them jobs in the City as Bankers and Solicitors. They are sad, pathetic rich kids who like to play at street heroes but don't have a clue that the real enemy is controlling them. I doubt whether any of these Class Warriors has realised that the State want destruction and death on the streets of the capital in order to justify harsh repression, classify protest as terrorism, and complete the Police State. But, of course, to these people, that doesn't matter because they can then slip back into the establishment workplace and officially join the oppressors they feign to oppose.
The strategy of creating an opposition against visible instruments of power has been used the world over. Tomorrow, the only people who will gain from the chaos caused by the controlled opposition, will be the State and the International elite. Anyone tempted to go to London must be aware of the trap being laid. Tomorrow has been orchestrated to create an excuse to usher in the Police Sate our rulers have long dreamt of. If we fall for this trick, it will be a guaranteed victory of Internationalism over Freedom. If you are going, be very, very, careful indeed.
Interesting articles:
http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/2009/mar/30/cctv-london-government-transport-g20
http://www.infowars.net/articles/march2009/310309G20_plot.htm
