Beullogeo's

Comrades! Following our highly successful defence of gangsta rap, we have decided to tackle the issue of Folk Music. We will be leaving our secret workers headquarters in Yeadon tonight to confront the purveyors of this evil music. We have been reliably informed that the Grove Inn, in Leeds city centre, regularly hosts folk music events. This is unacceptable.

We will be meeting at the railway station before going to physically confront the folk crowd. Hey Nonny Nonny is code for Sieg Heil. Sid from Adel says so and he knows everything about music. Those who listen to Folk are Natsis. Of course they are. If they weren't, they'd be listening to R&B.

We believe that everyone should be allowed to listen to whatever they want, but Folk is beyond the pale. Folk is an expression of Englishness. It is racism in music. Join us tonight and help us beat the fash out of Leeds. Peace out.

Immigration is an emotive issue. Amongst the indigenous peoples of Europe, the rapid influx of non-Europeans following the defeat of the European powers by the US/UK axis of Zionist evil, has become an issue which has created a lot of anger - both on the part of those who oppose immigration, and those who welcome the newcomers.

Immigration has resulted in the break-down of social cohesion as wholly different cultures have arrived en masse. A common argument by the defenders of immigration is that countries such as Great Britain were built of waves of immigration. This is true. However, the immigrants arriving from the European mainland were members of the same European family and tended to arrive in small enough numbers to be absorbed by the country as a whole. That is not to say that they did not impact upon the culture of the British Isles.

One only has to look at the regional differences in England to see the result of the blending of the original Britons with the European mainlanders. The Geordies of the North-east have a dialect which includes many Norwegian words. Yorkshire is fiercely Viking, being known for its welcoming but tough Danish character - it is particularly fierce in the West Riding where the blend with the original Celts is most profound. The people of East Anglia have the laid back 'steady-away' approach of the North Germans. The Southern English Saxons are 'soft' in comparison with their Nordic brothers. The Kentish have their own distinctive character. The people of Mercia (the West Midlands) have a cut-throat approach to business, hidden behind a false image of naïveté which is second to none. These are only the main variations in England. There are others across Scotland, Cymru and Kernow. However there is a unity which binds all Britons together. We are descended from different branches of the same European stock.

The immigration from Europe which created the blend in the British Isles was an immigration of military conquest. The Romans, Vikings, Angles, Saxons, Jutes, Normans etc came as soldiers. The Britons defended the shores. As a result only the strongest amongst the invaders and the defenders survived. The result was to infuse the blood of the people of the Isles with good, strong and eugenic genetic material. The British were moulded over centuries of limited incursions, gradually adapting and building upon the new influences.

Immigration post World war Two has none of the qualities of the productive immigration which preceded it. Whereas the immigration of the past was gradual, the immigrants since the 1950s have come in huge numbers. The make-up of the immigrants has also been radically different. Whereas in the past the invaders shared a common European culture and common religion (Pagan or Christian), the new immigrants have none of this commonality. They come from Africa and Asia, having their own distinct cultures, identities and religions. Another difference is that due to the scale of the new (non-military) invasions, the newcomers do not adapt to the country to which they have come; they establish ghettos. One only has to look to Leicester, Bradford etc to see entire communities which are culturally, racially, religiously and linguistically Pakistani. The same applies across the whole of Europe, with whole communities of Turks, Chinese, Somalis - infact every type of non-European - setting up self contained communities which do not integrate or even attempt to assimilate with the host population.

Why has this come to pass? How is it that every European nation world-wide has been impacted in the same way? Had just Great Britain been subjected to the non-European invasion, we could say it was proof of how wonderful Britain is that everyone wants to live here. The situation applies to every European nation, so that is obviously not the reason. Is life that hard outside Europe that people are fleeing to wherever they can? No, that isn't the case either. Certainly there are countries where life is tough, but as can be seen with the Pakistanis who divide their time between living in Europe and in Pakistan, fleeing from destitution or persecution is not the reason for the majority of those who come to Europe. What is it then?

Money! The reason immigrants are coming to Europe in their millions is financial. How can this be? Quite simply, the Governments of Europe are subsidising the invasion. Newcomers are given preferential treatment in housing. They are allowed to work within their own communities, paying less tax then the indigenous population, in some case no tax at all and claiming benefits as well as working. Not all of the newcomers indulge in tax-dodging and benefit fraud, but a sizable proportion do. This is not because they are 'dishonest thieving tax-dodging scroungers', as the hysterical media would have one believe; it is because they are allowed by government to live that way.

The media are happy to sell their 'news'papers by putting stories of immigrants taking advantage of the good-will of the nation. This fuels feelings of hostility in the indigenous population. This in turn creates protest. How do the government deal with this? They enact legislation forbidding people to question the presence of alien ghettos. They classify anyone who objects to the breakdown of societal cultural cohesion as a 'racist', then using manufactured and controlled 'Nationalist' Parties they focus upon how evil are those who do not want their country to be balkanised. They then create anti-racist groups to fight the Nationalists. Using the tired propaganda of the Holocaust, they whip the anti-racist groupings into wild hatred of anyone who declares him/herself an opponent of the cuddly one-world agenda. When people point to the fact that the Holocaust is as big a piece of state propaganda as the 9/11 lie, the government have them arrested and incarcerated. On top of this, they radicalise the newcomers to manufacture race-riots.

Why would the Government do this? Why did the British Government fund, train and arm the IRA? Why did the Government of the USA murder 3,000 Americans in New York, 11/09/01? Why did Zionists orchestrate the bombing of supply lines to the Concentration Camps in war-time Europe to kill interned Jews by starvation and disease? Why did Israel create Hamas to murder ordinary Jews going about their daily business? The answer is, to further the agenda of the New World Order.

When the individual free nations of Europe were racially homogeneous, the populations had a common identity and an instinctive national pride. National Pride is a safeguard against globalism. The Zionist elite orchestrated the World Wars to break the cultures of the individual nations. They used sick propaganda to instill a hatred of all things German in fellow Anglo-Saxon and kindred nations. They created a feeling of guilt for the days of Empire, even though the people at home were as oppressed, if not more so, than the people in the colonies. Then they used all the false guilt of Empire and Holocaust to make the indigenous populations accept mass immigration. Anyone who objects, we are told, is a Nazi and an Imperialist.

The new immigrants to Europe were brought here by government deliberately to be used to create social disunity. Colonies of Muslims, Africans, Chinese etc, being seen to be given preferential treatment over the tax-paying indigenous people, have been used as pawns in a global chess game. Nationalist and Anti-fascists have been duped into attacking one another over the presence of these colonies. All the while, legislation upon legislation has been passed to restrict freedom of speech. Ostensibly this has been to protect 'minorities' from 'discrimination'. In reality it has been to condition the population to the dogma of political correctness; to an understanding that the Government has a right to dictate what one is allowed to say or think.

Immigration is not about 'Johnny Foreigner' coming to our shores to steal our women and our wealth. It is about dividing the people and rendering them unable to defend themselves against the New World Order. The immigrants are not to blame. It is the Zionist elite who have used them who are behind the problems immigration has contributed to. The presence of nationally/racially proud ghettos in our midst is dangerous. The anti-Islamic red-herring is being used to whip the Muslim communities into a murderous frenzy against the non-Muslim host. When the bombs drop in Pakistan, the blood of Muslims and non-Muslims alike will flow in the streets in Europe. The foot-soldiers of Antifa will suffer the same fate as the Nationalists they have been taught to fight. The Globalists will push their insane wars to the long-planned World War III if we continue to give then passive unwitting support.

We must stop the Zionist globalist agenda. The solution to Globalism is Nationalism. Not the skinhead racist stereotype, but a genuine Nationalism built upon mutual respect of racial and cultural differences. Racial hatred is a tool of the Globalists, used to make opposition to their goal appear to come from hatred of others, not love of freedom. We must help the alien colonies in Europe to resettle in their own homelands. We must reject all those who would encourage hatred due to differences. Global diversity in homogeneous free nations is the only cure for the disease of anti-cultural, anti-national coca cola Zionism.

Shimon Peres is to be knighted by Queen Elizabeth II when he visits Great Britain in November. He is to be awarded the title of Knight of the Order of Saint Michael and Saint George.

So what has Shimon Peres contributed to the world, and to Britain in particular? What has this man done which merits an award from Her Majesty Queen Elizardbeth?

Shimon Peres is implicated in the murder of Yitzhak Rabin. Rabin's crime was to call for peace with the Palestinians and an end to the ethnic cleansing of Palestinian land in Greater Israel. Rabin did not advocate the dismantling of the bandit state, merely a reduced level of occupation in the West Bank and Gaza. This was so offensive to the self-chosen elite of Zionism, that Rabin was murdered. Immediately following the murder of Prime Minister Rabin, Peres took the helm. One of his first acts was to invade the sovereign nation of the Lebanon, forcing 400,000 people to flee from their homes, and an unknown number to be murdered. The butchering of Rabin and the Lebanese by Israeli and Zionist forces under Peres' command is to be rewarded by the Queen.

Peres has all the chutzpah of the snake he is. When visiting fellow Zionist state, Turkey, he stated that the massacre of 1,500,000 Armenians by the Turks in the Great War could not be called genocide and should not be considered to be of equal worth to the suffering of the Jews in the Second World War. In a sense, he is correct. The massacre of the Christian people of Armenia is a historical fact, and therefore should not be compared with the propaganda lie of the Holocaust. The murder of Armenians is in no way similar to the detention of Jews and their subsequent highly subsidised relocation to the USA, Israel and across the world. The fact that the massacres in Armenia were ordered by the Jewish leader of Turkey, Mustafa Kemal, for the benefit of Zionism may be the only link - After all, Zionism benefited greatly from the fabled Holocaust.

The knighting of Peres follows in the footsteps of the knighting of mass murderer and accomplice to the New York World Trade Centre massacre, Rudolph Giuliani. Knighthoods are allegedly meant to acknowledge deeds which have benefited the Crown of Great Britain. Certainly the WTC bombings aided the British invasion of the Middle East and Central Asia and help secure the goal of a Global Zionist Empire. Obviously the millions of murdered Asians are of no consequence to our beloved Queenie.

There are still people who tug their forelocks and proclaim 'God save the Queen'. They argue that the Monarchy have served the British people and deserve our respect. They are wrong. The Monarchy are arch-Zionists who serve the New World Order. The knighting of murderers such as Giuliani and Peres show who they really serve. They serve their fellow Zionists. To that end it should also be noted that Zionists use the ordinary Jews as a smokescreen to hide their real nature. Not all Jews are Zionists and not all Zionists are Jews. The leaders of Zionism are Jews who use non-Jews to divert attention from their racist anti-gentile agenda. The hatred of the Ashkenazim for the Sephardim (the semitic Jews) is legendary. The Ashkenazi Zionists would sacrifice every Sephardi Jew and every free-thinking anti-Talmud Jew to further their satanic agenda. They fear ordinary Jews waking up and abandoning the Jewish strait-jacket. The ordinary citizens in Israel will suffer under the heel of the Zionist New World Order as much as everyone else.

If the Queen is so keen to honour her partners in crime, perhaps she would do Great Britain, Israel and the rest of the world a favour and take her entire family to live in New York with the other vipers of the New World Order. Queen Elizabeth - you are not welcome in this country. Pack your bags and leave!

The flag-waving Monarchist should also take note that the 'God' the Queen serves is not the Christian God, it is Satan. The people of Great Britain, especially those who call themselves Nationalists, need to wake up from their hypnotic slumber. The Monarchy, which misguided souls such the 'Loyalists' in Ulster support, are a key part of the Satanic Bankers New World Order. Those who stand for freedom must oppose the Crown.

Blacks are polling 95-1 for Obama, but a black commentator at CNN.com assures us: Black vote isn't monolithic. Which sounds about as plausible as Ian Jobling's assertion that jews aren't ethnocentric.

The explanation for any apparent bias can presumably be found only in the minds of hate-filled racist Whites. That's the way Harold Meyerson sees it. Blacks flock to Obama and somehow he blames it on deracinated Republicans.

Brace yourselves. For the forseeable future any criticism of Obama will be called racism. His smallest failures will be blamed on racism. His smallest successes will be proclaimed as great triumphs over racism. What remains of the constitution will be shredded in the name of halting the scourge of racism. Racism will ruin the economy, kill our soldiers, and make our children stupid. AIDS and cancer will be found to be caused, in part, by racism.

As Georgetown University sociology professor Michael Eric Dyson recently said, "black people don't vote for candidates just because they are black. If Clarence Thomas ran for president, he would get five black votes."

This is like saying, "jewish people don't vote for candidates just because they are jews. If Israel Shamir ran for president of israel, he would get five jewish votes." Shamir would lose for the same reason as David Duke. Because jews are intensely aware of and motivated by their collective interests, not because they aren't.

Likewise with blacks. Colin Powell would be a fairer comparison to McCain, both being RINOs, but it's not hard to imagine even Clarence "Uncle" Thomas getting more black votes than any White opponent he faced. Blacks would certainly cross party lines to vote for any black Republican over any White Democrat, just as they are crossing the other way in this election. The black votes Thomas wouldn't get would be those who don't trust him because he thinks and acts too White. Thomas' ratio of black votes would only differ from Obama's in quantity, not quality.

Whites had a similar choice with Clinton vs Obama and now with McCain vs Obama. In both cases White-haters denounce us as racists because we don't vote 95-1 against the White candidate. The double standard is so blatant that even deracinated Whites are beginning to notice. When they start asking questions some of them are going to find out that not only are they "racists", they're "anti-semites" too. Uh oh.

Rather than trying to deny our "insane hate" I think more Whites will, like me, recognize such ridiculous rhetoric as a reflection of our critics' ethnocentric character, not our own. These Whites will grow a shell and their heretofore reflexive apologetic reaction to accusations of "racism" and "anti-semitism" will disappear.

(Image by INCOGMAN.)

Sodium Fluoride is being added to milk in primary schools across Sheffield. It is argued by the local NHS that it should also be added to the water supply. The rationale for this is that Fluoride is useful in the prevention of tooth decay. This however is not only incorrect, it is a lie.

Fluoride is a poison. Don't believe me? Good - you shouldn't believe anyone; you should do your own research. On this issue the research is very easy to do. To find out what Sodium Fluoride is for, go into a shop which sells rat poison and look at the ingredients. There you will find Sodium Fluoride listed as the principle ingredient. Fluoride is used to kill rats. In the UK, it is a Part II poison under the Poisons Act (1972). It is a key ingredient of Sarin poison gas.

Another use of Fluoride is as a sedative. Prozac is probably the best known anti-depressant. It is prescribed to many millions of people across the globe. It has been linked to suicides, and all manner for mental ill-health. If it has any impact on curing depression, that is only because it suppresses the ability of the patient to experience any emotions. It turns people into zombies. What is the main ingredient in Prozac? Fluoxetine - a compound based on Fluoride. Fluoride was used in the Soviet Union to keep prisoners docile. The USSR used Fluoride on those they considered undesirable. Prozac is used in the EUssr in the same way - on anyone the Doctors can push it onto.

So what is this substance they want to medicate us all with? Sodium Fluoride is a by-product of aluminium smelting and also of fertiliser. It is, quite simply, industrial waste. Rather than pay for the toxic waste to be taken away and safely disposed of, the industrial giants and their partners in crime (for that is what it is) in government have come up with the lucrative solution of putting this poison in the water supply - and you, the taxpayer, foot the bill!

But isn't fluoride good for children's teeth. In a word, NO. Fluoride causes Fluorosis which is a pitting and yellowing of the teeth. Rather than improving teeth, it actually harms them. It also causes bones to become weak and brittle. Fluoride in toothpaste is bad enough - although proper brushing techniques do not involve swallowing toothpaste. However in the case of fluoridated water, the victim who drinks it has no way of avoiding the harm which will be caused. A good way to get your teeth white is to brush them using (white) cider vinegar. It doesn't taste as bad as it sounds and it actually works. Fluoride on the other hand, does not work and causes a whole range of problems.

Research in the USA where Fluoridated water is commonplace, has found a link between intake of fluoride and lowered IQ. This marvellous product causes tooth decay, osteoporosis, mental illness, docility and makes the drinker stupid. Anything else? Oh yes, it also causes Alzheimer's, Attention Deficit Disorder (ADD), Learning disabilities, Memory loss, Arthritis, Bone Cancer to mention but a few.

Bottled water company Danone are putting it in their water. Others are set to follow. The Georgia Guide Stones call for a reduction of the population of the planet to no more than 500 million. Fluoridation is one of the ways they they hope to achieve this - by weakening the ability of the people to resist the evil they have planned for us.

Resist fluoridation. Do not buy fluoridated water. Do not allow the government to give fluoridated milk to your children. Expose these liars who want to physically and mentally cripple us all. Do your own research. Share your research. Stop the satanic bankers' New World Order.

For more information see here and here

We are on the verge of another New World order. Yet again we find ourselves in a highly technological era. The hidden rulers are amassing ever more dangerous weapons, and are using them. They are devastating Iraq with depleted Uranium, which is causing all manner of genetic mutations. They are on the brink of openly creating human-animal hybrids (I say openly, for they have been doing this for some time). They are finalising a control grid which will enable them to have absolute knowledge (Omniscience) of everyone on the planet, with the power to impose their will without the possibility of an effective resistance (Omnipotence). The rulers are about to give themselves the powers of Gods.

We have in our mythology a folk-memory which describes the event we are experiencing now as they happened in a time long ago. It doesn't matter where in the world we are, the mythology describes the same event. In Europe, the mythology relates to the global civilisation known as Atlantis.

We have stories of the nuclear destruction of Sodom and Gomorrah. These stories in the Old Testament predate the Bible - it is just there that they were written down. Until very recently the story of the destruction of the two cities was taken to be a religious fable. Now evidence is available which proves that nuclear weapons were used in a war which resulted in their utter destruction.

We have in Greek Mythology stories of the Minotaur and other creatures which we have been led to believe were pure fantasy. Now with the science of genetics we have proof of genetic engineering such as genes from humans in pigs. This explains the prohibition against eating pig flesh as being more than a religious whim. The theory of evolution simply doesn't work. The only explanation which makes any sense is that a highly technological society manipulated the genes of extant species, with the resultant sudden shift in the forms of life on the planet. Religious people call these genetic manipulators 'Gods'. In modern parlance we call them scientists.

We have the stories of flying machines wreaking havoc on civilian populations. These stories were treated as the product of a healthy imagination, until ærial warfare became a reality. Many researchers confuse the issue by speaking of aliens from outerspace. There is no need for this. The cosmonauts of prehistory were more advanced than our current military fliers, but were of the same vein.

We have the story of a great flood which wiped out the global civilisation. This story, like the others, is repeated the world over. Archaeologist are finding proof of a great flood in many places around the world. The pyramids off the coast of Japan could not possibly have been built under the ocean, but there they stand. They must have been built before the flood. Other underwater structures have been found in places as far afield as Bermuda and India.

Evidence is mounting in all manner of areas to point to the myths of today being the memory of the facts of yesterday. The destruction of the civilisation we call Atlantis came at the peak of their power. They were a scientifically advanced global society who abused their knowledge and destroyed themselves. We have scientists now trying to prove the 'Big Bang' theory by means of the world's largest particle accelerator. They admit themselves that a successful experiment could destroy the world as we know it. Yet still they press on.

The HAARP facility in Alaska has been implicated in the New Orleans Hurricane, the China Earthquake and the Indonesia Tsunami. They are manipulating the weather to cause massive loss of life. Chemtrails are proof of their attack on the environment. They orchestrated the fake War on Terror to butcher as many soldiers and civilians as possible. These people are not sane in any way that we would use the word.

The hidden rulers of the world are linked by blood. They are, in effect, one big unhappy dysfunctional family. These people are the descendants of the Atlanteans who destroyed the world roughly 12,000 years ago. It has taken them all this time to regain control. They have no compassion for the vast majority of the planet. They relish making humanity suffer. In a word they are the embodiment of Evil.

The hidden rulers of the New World Order are putting into effect a plan they have used before. They have an agenda, the reality of which we can only surmise. What we know for certain is it involves the deaths of at least 7,000 million of us. They do not want money or power - they have that in abundance already. Whatever it is they are after, the last time they attempted to achieve their goal, they very nearly destroyed the planet. This time the world may not survive. Good cannot coexist with evil. That is why we must stop them; if we don't they will enslave us until such time as we are no longer of any use, then they will exterminate us.

We do not have much time left to deal with those who would destroy us. Everyone must help expose the truth of the New World Order if we have any of us have any chance of survival. Not tomorrow - tomorrow is too late. We must act now.

Sex education lessons in England are to be compulsory for all school-children, immediately they start school (currently at 5 years of age). The twisted logic the Government are employing is that if children receive sex education they will be less likely to be promiscuous. This is akin to telling a child that there are sweeties in the kitchen and then expecting the child not to want to eat them! It is human nature to want to try new things. this is especially the case with children. To imply that telling children about sex will somehow stop them wanting to try it, is ludicrous. As if we needed any more proof that the Catholic Church has been destroyed from within by years of infiltration, the Catholic Education Service support this!

The Government has already ordered teachers to present homosexuality in a positive light, and to encourage people to 'experiment'. It is now illegal for school teachers to tell children that sodomy is unhealthy and immoral. As part of the Religious Hatred Bill (2008) it is illegal to criticise homosexuality. This tendency has spread into the Police Force who now are under instruction from Government to not arrest homosexuals who engage in cottaging (having anonymous sex in public toilets, parks and other places frequented by the general public).

It is becoming increasingly obvious that the Government are not merely trying to create a 'tolerant' society with equality for everyone regardless of sexual orientation (to use the politically correct spiel). The thrust of Government policy is aimed at implementing the Communitarian agenda which requires the destruction of the normal family and its replacement with sex obsessed deviants. This should come as no surprise considering the number of perverts who walk the halls of Westminster. It is however no laughing matter.

The politicians and their front groups such as Common Purpose are using the law to destroy the next generation. The Globalist agenda requires a destruction of morality and decency, in order to turn humans into machines for the production and consumption of material goods.

Anyone who has children and is able to, needs to home school them. In many countries this is now illegal. Why? Because they do not want an educated population, but an indoctrinated one. TheProtocols of Zion called for the destruction of Christian youth - this certainly is part of that agenda. The people who rule the UK, (including the monarchy) and their counterparts across the globe are sick monsters out to rape the minds of the innocent. And they dare call us the extremists!

A black and white version of this photo was on DrudgeReport Wednesday morning with the caption "LANDSLIDE" just below. I didn't have time to save Drudge's image or read the story he linked, but it did occur to me how manipulative it was to make the image black and white, deliberately modifying it in a way that left the messianic dimension intact while obscuring the racial dimension.

Later I was able to find the original full-color version. According to the source the photo was taken on 6 July 2008. Since then it has apparently bounced around the internets via secret brotha chain email. Sorta like the Obama-is-a-muslim meme and worse have been bouncing around the jewish internets.

Oddly enough I'm not in either social circle, so I didn't see this picture until just now. After searching for it. Doesn't the media usually monitor and report on popular phenomena like this? The full-color image sure does make a dramatic impression. It's Pulitzer material. Why should Whites be shielded from the graphic reality this race is revealing about race? Oh, that's right. We're not supposed to think about race.

Until you read the next headline. And the next. And the next...

- - -

Also from Drudge Wednesday: Shame on McCain and Palin for using an old code word for black:

The "socialist" label that Sen. John McCain and his GOP presidential running mate Sarah Palin are trying to attach to Sen. Barack Obama actually has long and very ugly historical roots.

J. Edgar Hoover, director of the FBI from 1924 to 1972, used the term liberally to describe African Americans who spent their lives fighting for equality.

. . .

McCain and Palin have simply reached back in history to use an old code word for black. It set whites apart from those deemed unAmerican and those who could not be trusted during the communism scare.

Drudge's headline, "PAPER: 'Socialist' label called 'old code word for black'...", made the any-criticism-of-Obama-is-racism meme transparent enough. The hilarious thing about the article's actual argument is that in the "old days", before reality-twisting honesty-smothering political correctness came to power, nobody used code words for blacks. People spoke plainly and simply said "negro" or "colored" when they meant negro or colored. "Socialist" might be a new code word for blacks, but it isn't an old one.

On the other hand "socialist", or more precisely "communist", was indeed an old code word for jews. Even as early as 1917 many Whites were afraid of the stigma attached to being called "anti-semite". Many of these Whites, even the ones in government whose job it was to defend us from enemies foreign and domestic, couldn't bring themselves to actually say out loud what they could plainly see with their eyes. That's because their brains knew what would happen to their wallets if they didn't bite their tongues. Just as it works today, only the "social pricing" was not as expensive.

There were men who spoke out anyway. Henry Ford. William Dudley Pelley. Charles Lindbergh. They all paid a price.

By 1972 even presidents dared to express anti-jewish thoughts only in private. Today we're told by our enlightened elite that Nixon was an anti-semite, because he must have been imagining the jewish influence that only an anti-semite can imagine has since become ever more pervasive and obvious. And it's just in our wild imaginations that the country seems to be going down the drain, just as Billy Graham and Nixon feared. But that's just more raving. Here's what's really important:

There's no way to settle whether Nixon was an anti-Semite—not just because you can't peer into someone's soul, but also because there's no litmus test for anti-Semitism. No, Nixon didn't hate all Jews personally, nor did he use unreconstructed Henry Ford-style anti-Jewish appeals—though, of course, virtually no major public figure in the last 50 years has. Yet clearly he thought and spoke of Jews as a group, more or less united in their opposition to him, possessing certain base and malign characteristics, and worthy of his scorn and hatred. You don't have to call that anti-Semitism if you don't want to. But there's no denying it represents a worldview deserving of the strongest reproach.

Never mind that you can find in the media virtually every day - without looking hard - opinions expressed about Whites as a group (sometimes coded), as more or less racist and possessing certain other base and malign characteristics, and worthy of scorn and hatred. Never mind that Ford's warning is almost 90 years past, not 50. In jewish minds Ford inspired Hitler to almost exterminate their race just yesterday, and today's rising crescendo of White-bashing from on high isn't a crime at all. It's not even happening. La la la la la. And if it is happening, so what? It's justice. And if you notice any jews bashing away it isn't because they're "deserving of the strongest reproach". No. It's because you're an anti-semite throwback - like Ford, Nixon, Graham, Pelley, Lindbergh, ... Knuckledragging jackbooted ignoramuses one and all.

- - -

Among the things Lindbergh mentioned in Des Moines was how smears and slurs are used to manipulate us. Here's a contemporary example. It concerns Rep. Michele Bachmann of Minnesota who "appeared on Hardball and pounded away at Barack Obama’s associations with his long-time minister, Reverend Jeremiah Wright and bomber Bill Ayers, suggesting that the media should be investigating these associations with very anti-American voices". This prompted Mike Malloy, the former CNN news writer, to say:

She represents a district in Minnesota, she's a Republican of course, and she’s a hatemonger. She’s the type of person that would have gladly rounded up the Jews in Germany and shipped them off to death camps. She’s the type of person who would have had no problem sending typhoid smeared blankets to Native American families awaiting deportation to reservations. She’s the type of person that I’m sure believes that the use of Agent Orange in Vietnam was good and the use of depleted uranium in Iraq served a purpose. This is an evil bitch from hell. I mean, just an absolute evil woman.

Note that Malloy implies that Whites who oppose Obama are not just guilty of being "racist", and we're not just guilty of genociding jews and indians. No. Now we're also guilty of genociding the poor vietnamese and iraqis.

Imagine what Whites will be accused of after four years of Change. I bet genociding somalis and latinos will be on the list. Read that link and see how those jews and socialists "fighting for equality" really get around. Somehow racist Whites will get the blame. You can bank on it. In fact you can build a Rube Goldberg-style business based on loaning somebody else's money to other somebodies you know will never repay while collecting a fat fee and selling the loans to other somebodies who will get screwed later. When that plays out you can get your distant relative in the government to "rescue" you with more money from some other people, so you can get out of that old used-up business and into another. Cha-ching.

If that "getting" and "making" stuff of Ford's is starting to make sense it's either because you're a loser who needs a non-White scapegoat to blame, or because it makes sense.

- - -

Such is the fruit of 60+ years of pretending race doesn't matter. Tastes a bit fecal, doesn't it?

I am an entity from the Lacerta constellation. In need of a change of scenery, I recently traversed space and made my way to the city of Wakefield. Unlike humans who eat food to survive, my species feeds on misery and depravity. Wakefield proved to be a veritable Eden for me. I assumed the physical form of a Yorkshireman and walked down Westgate absorbing the negative energy from the spotty loud-mouthed youths. Around the Cathedral I almost passed out, so vile were the local scratters. I realised I would have to calm my feeding or risk being overwhelmed by too much poison. I decided to seek accommodation so I could relax for a while before resuming a more leisurely feast.

I spoke to a bearded man clutching a bottle of White Star Cider about how to go about getting somewhere to live. He fell into paroxysms of laughter, explaining that I had no chance. "They don't give houses to the likes of you and me" he shouted in between swigs of his apple-free drink. I tried to get more information but to no avail. I spoke to several other people about this, only to be met with denial of what the first man had said, and accusations of being a 'natsi'. Eventually a rather sad but helpful lady told me of a new breed of bipeds that had arrived in the city, who apparently got preferential treatment in housing, benefits, health care and all manner of things. I immediately shape-shifted into one of these super-beings (much to the woman's shock) and made my way to the jobcentre.

The jobcentre resembled one of the jungle planets near from where I come. I was astounded by the variety of bipeds and the number of tongues spoken. Oddly, the identity I had first assumed was not amongst those represented. I could see what the cider-swiller was talking about, and wondered whether his choice of beverage was in some way linked with these newcomers.

I spoke to the woman on the reception desk who told me I would have to ring her from a 'phone box, even though I was in the building already! I took this to be a bizarre custom, but followed it through. The man at the end of the 'phone told me I would have to wait about six weeks for money and it could be months before I got a house. Remembering the reaction of the Wakey locals to my questions about housing, I called him a Natsi and told him the only reason he was refusing me benefits was because I was a newcomer. This mantra worked like a charm. Immediately his manger came on the line and arranged for an immediate appointment with a job-adviser! I told the adviser I couldn't possibly work because it was against my worldview. He told me that was fine, I could go on sick pay. This made me very happy.

After sorting my money, I asked about a house. The adviser put me through to the housing department of Wakefield Council. I told them I was considering bringing my ten wives to live with me, each of whom has many children. He said that was fine and gave me the keys to Wakefield Cathedral!

I love this country. No where else in the Universe have I been able to get so much for doing so little. It is true what they say about the generosity of Yorkshire folk. They will even go without food and heating, whilst working like dogs, just to keep us newcomers in luxury. The misery in this town could feed my entire planet. God bless Wakefield!

Since its inception, the Roman Catholic Church has been the bulwark against the megalomania of the followers of the Talmud. There has been a battle going on for centuries to destroy the Church of Rome in order to make possible the long dreamed of global victory of the 'Chosen People'. In its current incarnation as political Zionism, the ancient enemy of the Church has finally achieved the victory it has long sort.

Christianity began as a fulfillment of Old Testament prophecy. Jews who followed Jesus were the first Christians. The racially non-specific nature of Christianity led to the rapid expansion of Christianity from a Jewish sect to a multi-ethnic religion. In contrast, the Jews who rejected Jesus as the fulfillment of prophecy became the racially obsessed religion which although called Judaism, should really be referred to as Talmudism, or even Satanism. At the most fundamental level, Christianity sees Jesus as the prophesied Messiah, Judaism sees him as a fraud, indeed as a work of the Devil. From the very beginning, the two religions were absolutely incompatible.

The power of the Church led to excesses and corruption such as the selling of dispensations (basically forgiving sins for cash). The notion of dispensations was rabbinical in origin. The result of this heresy was the protestant Reformation and the end of the unity of the Church. This was a highly successful Judaic attempts to subvert the Church. Around the same time as this, the Anglican Church was founded. Rather than being an attempt to reform Catholicism, Anglicanism was a rejection of it.

The Church of Rome survived the Reformation and was still a power to be reckoned with in the first half of the twentieth century. Then the impact of mass infiltration of the Priest-hood by communists began to be felt. The last true Pope was Pius XII. Following the death of Pius XII in 1959, Jewish Communist and Freemason, Paul VI, took over the Papacy. He ushered in Vatican II which was a wholesale rejection of traditional Catholic dogma. Paul VI even signed his name so it could be read as 666 when reversed. This evil man wore the Ephod of a Jewish High Priest. When he died he was buried in a plain box with no crucifix, as is the Jewish way. In no way could Paul VI be called Catholic.

One of the architects of Vatican II and disciple of Paul VI was Joseph Ratzinger, who went on to become Benedict XVI. The harm caused bu Paul VI has been accelerated under this Pope. Benedict takes great pride in attending services at Synagogues, thus rejecting two millenia of Catholic teaching, that salvation can only be found by embracing Roman Catholicism. If this was not bad enough, we now have the dire heresy of dispensationalism being openly espoused.

Dispensationalism is a belief that the Jews are a chosen people and that they do not have to embrace Christ to enter Heaven. This is the ultimate blasphemy, as it rejects completely the teachings of Jesus himself. Dispensationalism is Satanism writ large. It accepts Israel as the land given to the Jews by God. It is absolute theological Zionism. It is the most dangerous heresy to ever befall Christianity.

After trying to destroy Christianity for 2000 years, the globalist enemy have realised their dream. Anglicanism was a Satanic cult from the start, the Protestant Churches have become wishy-washy pro-Zionist entities, with very few exceptions, and now the Church of Rome has fallen. Organised Christianity has been taken over by Masons, Communists and Satanist Jews. The Jews who follow their own religion (or none) are not the problem. It is Zionists who use the cloak of religion to hide their agenda who are our enemies. This includes many gentiles and is not a simple case of one race or another being at fault. Certainly the Jews have been pushed to prominence, but this is merely an illusion to take attention from the diverse nature of the leaders of Zionism. What binds them is not race, it is religion. That religion is not Judaism or Christianity, it is Satanism. This is what was prophesied in the time of Christ, and what was set out step by step in the Protocols. Is it possible that the men who walk around with sandwich-boards proclaiming the 'End is Nigh', may be right at last?

Proof of the fulfillment of the Protocols of Zion can be seen in the fact that, with very few exceptions, the Zionist lie that they are a forgery is parroted by everyone. The education system has been so debased that the sheeple no longer have the capacity to think, and are becoming the useful drones necessary for the architects of the New World Order to complete their plan to enslave us all. Read more here.

Comrades! What a victory! On Saturday 18th October the Anti Natsi League led 349 students in a chorus of shouting and hissing at the British Peoples Party demo against racist/sexist/chauvinistic/homophobic/black supremacist cds. Imagine the scene...350 of us all gathered in Leeds to smash the fash. What a great day!

The numbties in the BPP numbered barely double figures. There they stood ranting on about how wrong it is for multi-national capitalist chain store, HMV, to profit from sales of rap cds which abuse women, gays and whites. We showed our true socialist credentials by shouting abuse at these natsi scumbags. At one point we put some gangsta rap on loud speakers to drown out the fash. How we laughed as the BPP campaign for equal treatment for all, regardless of race, gender or sexuality was drowned out by booyakah rap calling for white women to be raped and queers to be shot! That showed the fash!

We had a dicey moment when some of the students started asking whether we should be holding this demo, as perhaps the BPP had a point. One obvious retard even had the cheek to say that if HMV could stock anti-white cds, why shouldn't they stock pro-white cds by the likes of Skrewdriver? These democracy lovers soon got what was coming to them as the militant rugger boys gave them wedgies. These pacifist types have no place on our demos!

As the day went on the filth did their best to stop us getting to the fash. We believe in peace and socialist love. If we could have got to the fash we would have killed them - rest in peace is our motto.

We got some great publicity with the Yorkshire Post turning up. Funny thing is, the BPP contingent was so small the YP wouldn't have turned out had it not been for us. Still, the fash may have got in the papers, but we got more coverage for smashing up Lands Lane. Leeds Council Tax payers will have to cough up to put the damage right. That doesn't bother us - Students and Doleys don't pay tax - we're too revolutionary to work!

After the demo we got wrecked on cheap cider and ketamine. We let the people of Leeds know how principled we are. One of the lads filmed our antics and put in on youtube. I'm going to show the video to my Mum - she'll be proper proud!

On the 18th October the British Peoples Party held a demo against racist rap music. Antifa turned up mob handed to protest against the BPP, thus holding a counter-demo in defence of racist, sexist, homophobic, black-supremacist music! There is a a video of the event on youtube on which it can clearly be seen that the much hyped Antifa presence was mainly made up of students on a day out. The hard-core Anti-Fascists showed themselves for the violent thugs we have come to know them as. They set out to deliberately destroy public property and attempted to intimidate the opposition by means of threats of violence. This tactic of terrorising people one does not agree with has a name - it is called TERRORISM.

West Yorkshire Police did a commendable job in keeping the terrorist AFA away from the peaceful protest of the BPP. The BPP objective was to highlight the racist, sexist, supremacist and homophobic nature of some of the products being sold by HMV. This objective was met, with the added bonus of the Leeds city centre HMV shop remaining closed, thus losing money as a direct consequence of stocking such vile 'music'. The AFA objective was to 'Smash the Fash', which in English translates as silencing anyone who does not conform to the Stalinist ideology of AFA and their handlers. The AFA counter-demo and resulting riot served only to give publicity to the BPP protest. In fact, it was AFA's presence which led to HMV losing money - a result which goes in the BPP's favour. Overall, AFA failed miserably.

The BPP presence was only small, which has led to some claiming it was a failure. To tally up the result, the BPP acted legally and got their message across, HMV were exposed as mercenary peddlers of hate, losing money into the bargain, and AFA showed their true colours as violent terrorist scum, wrecking part of Leeds and alienating themselves from the ordinary people they farcically claim to represent.

There is a blog dedicated to documenting Charles Johnson's purge of commenters at Little Green Footballs.

The post titled Levi from Queens and the Great Discarded Lizard Chainsaw Massacre of 2008 - Case Study #24 - LGF BANNED AND BLOCKED concerns the banning of several "racists" and "fascists" who dared to speak in favor of "race realists" Lawrence Auster and Ian Jobling.

I left a comment that compared Charles to Auster, noting that they disagree on ethnic European nationalism, but agree on jewish nationalism (it's good), muslim nationalism (it's bad), and silencing anyone who vexes them.

Then Ian Jobling dropped by. He linked an ostensibly pro-"white" manifesto in which he writes:

Carrying on the dismal tradition of American white supremacism, most pro-whites today believe our current racial dispossession is due to Jewish influence on the West, if not actual Jewish conspiracies against whites. However, these tired lies conceal the real dynamics of white dispossession, which has been inflicted by white Gentiles on themselves. While it is true that Jews have been inclined towards highly liberal—that is, leukophobic—beliefs, nevertheless more than 90 percent of white racial liberals are Gentiles. Moreover, that Jewish leukophobia could thrive in America suggests that it was a mere extension of something in our national character. For these reasons, the pro-white movement repudiates anti-Semitism and will resolutely oppose the obsession with Jews that poisons and discredits our cause.

Jobling unequivocally blames Whites and absolves jews for any animosity between us. His is a pro-jewish manifesto cloaking itself in "white". It is cut from the same cloth as Auster's blame-for-the-"majority" protection-for-the-"minority" double-talk:

In my view, the Jewish neoconservatives advance an _ideological_ vision of America, and oppose any notion of a _substantive_ American nation, precisely because they fear that they would not be seen as 100 percent full citizens in it. To this degree, they are still functioning as a self-conscious minority trying to weaken an "oppressive" majority. And the majority, by yielding to the minority's demands, does indeed weaken itself and even puts itself on the path to extinction.

My solution to this dilemma is that the majority must re-discover itself _as_ the majority, and see the minority _as_ the minority. This doesn't mean exclusion, persecution, or loss of rights of the minority.

With "allies" like Jobling and Auster Whites don't need enemies.

UPDATE 24 Oct 2008: Thanks to Guessedworker I see Jobling has answered, after a fashion. In Anti-Semites Stink Up Another Discussion Thread he writes:

I left a comment linking to my blog post on the incident and explaining why I’m not a fascist, hoping I might get a decent discussion of race realism going with the moderates who traffic the site. However, it was not to be: I was immediately set upon by a couple of professional anti-Semites named tanstaafl, who runs the blog Age of Treason, and Greg Polden.

Jobling either doesn't care or is counting on the LGF BANNED thread disappearing, because anyone who's interested can read for themselves who said what and who set upon who.

Jobling adds very little to what's already been said. All he presents here is essentially point-and-sputter. He seems to be hoping LGF BANNED will delete the offending thread now that he has declared it "stinked up". His modus operandus is just like Auster's. What a coincidence.

I will continue to purge my comment queue of all dire ruminations sent in by tanstaafl and his like.

The urge to purge is strong in this one. I consider myself forewarned and thus will only waste time responding here.

The most substantial thing he wrote was in a comment:

Tanstaafl is referring to the fact that moderates like Johnson support Israel, but neither Islamic fundamentalism nor white nationalism. Since all that tanstaafl can see in politics is conflicts between different ethnic interests, or nationalisms, Johnson’s attitude seems completely nonsensical to him and can only be explained as a result of Jewish brainwashing.

However, once you go outside this absurdly narrow view of human motivations and realize that people’s political views are motivated by many different factors, then Johnson’s views make sense, even if you think they are mistaken. What matters most to moderates like Johnson is democratic, Western values. Since they think Israel exemplifies these values, they are pro-Israel. Since they think neither Islamic fundamentalism nor white nationalism are democratic ideologies, moderates are against them. Nationalism really has nothing to do with this preference; values explain them.

Bottom line: A person’s political outlook is rooted in many different factors, such as political ideology, ethnicity, class, and so forth. If you take a simplistic view of human motivations, the world makes no sense to you and leads you to make an ass of yourself in public.

I'm glad to see I got my point across. Yes, I think ethnic/racial interests are important. More important than class or political ideology. Jews are a perfect example. Despite their class, politics, country of residence, or how much Jobling denies being able to notice - jews just can't seem to set aside their ethnocentrism.

I am simplistic. I say flat out that I'm pro-White. Jobling and Auster are more complicated, but in a deceptive way. They present themselves as pro-"white", as "race realists". But they refuse to distinguish between Whites and jews. And they attack Whites who do distinguish, but not jews.

Going on about "democratic, Western values" while calling for political opponents to be silenced is a good way to make an ass of yourself. If Johnson and Jobling think the jewish ethnostate represents "democratic, Western values" then why do they oppose White ethnostates? If jews do not differ from Whites "in any important respect" then I should be able to move to israel and collect welfare, right? What's that? My mother has to be jewish? I don't object. But to demonstrate his consistent values Charles Johnson should either denounce zionists as racists, or he should support White ethno-nationalism like he supports zionism. The latter is especially sensible if he cares for "the West".

I’ve been deleting a lot of pro-MacDonald comments because their authors show no sign of having read the Lieberman article and are thus incapable of expressing an informed opinion. Anti-Semites show their typical dogmatism by leaping to the defense of MacDonald before they even know what the argument against him is.

Jobling seem to realize at some level that the urge to purge is not right. Thus he tries to transfer responsibility for the problem to those expressing the opinions he wishes to suppress. He makes repeated appeals to psychology...say doctor, heal thyself.

I didn't mention MacDonald until Jobling did. I agree with and respect much of what MacDonald has written, but what I think and write doesn't hinge on the truth or falseness of MacDonald's positions.

Yes, trying to convince the Age of Treason types to take a reasonable view of this issue is like trying to teach a monkey table manners. All you’ll get for your pains is faeces thrown at you.

I've taken pains to understand Jobling's arguments and to use his own logic and phraseology in answering and critcizing him. He can call that feces if he likes.

Possibly with the exception of the nomads of the remotest areas of Mongolia, or the junkies of Todmorden, everyone on the planet will be aware that there is a global economic downturn underway. Whether it is the Zionists and their bankers who have engineered this economic crisis, or the downtrodden workers who are being bled white by the aforementioned criminals, virtually everyone is being effected.

Nationalists have long argued that the only way to have a healthy economy is to end unrestricted immigration and repatriate the criminal elements and spongers who have arrived in Europe and kindred lands. Then, and only then, can we break away from the Finance-Capitalist / State-Socialist economy and introduce a Distributist system based on mutual co-operation, not exploitation. Not everyone agrees with this.

The Daily Mail, a typical bleeding heart liberal 'news'paper is decrying the British Government's decision to vet immigrants to weed out the unskilled who would not benefit the economy. In typical liberal style, these arrogant champagne-Marxists have attacked the Government list as being elitist. They use the example of a shortage of Ballerinas to pour scorn on the need for immigrants to have skills. To liberals, culture is a bad thing. They hate the idea of a healthy nation with pride in its culture - the only reason Ballet is seen as elitist is because the sick rulers of this nation encourage the false class system as a means of dividing the people from one another.

The Daily Mail is not alone in its whinging about the unfairness of stopping every featherless biped nesting in soil to which it does not belong. The Socialist Party argues that immigration should be allowed with no limits at all. The loonies of the SP are kindred spirits with the do-gooders of the Mail. They belong to the same internationalist mindset. Of course they have the luxury of not having to survive on the minimum wage, or having to live in areas enriched by their beloved international friends.

The whole quota issue is a red herring. So long as the EU exists, all member states will be subject to potential unlimited immigration from other member states. As one part of the Union becomes prosperous, people from areas in decline will be able to move to it en masse. The result will be to turn Europeans into rootless cosmopolitans, and to turn Europe into a cultural wasteland. Limiting non-Europeans is a side issue.

So what is the solution to mass unemployment and the skills shortage problem? Simply put, a realistic immigration policy, genuine national sovereignty, and education.

In order to have an immigration policy, each nation must become sovereign. That means the termination of the EU and other international super-states. The free nations must then repatriate all non-kindred immigrants. This will lead in some nations to a population shortage. Countries such as England which are heavily populated with non-Europeans will find themselves in a position where there is more work than people to do it. The solution - a policy of tax breaks for larger families, and sterilisation of those unfit to breed. This would reverse the communist programme of dysgenics which has done so much harm to Europeans. Then we must have an education system which elevates the people so no job is unfilled.

I speak of Europeans. Of course other peoples have suffered from internationalism. It is not only Europeans who are afflicted by the constant stream of unassimiable immigrants. The disgusting trade in children in Thailand is funded largely by European perverts. An ethnically based population policy would benefit everyone, of all nations and races.

Of course that would make the liberal bleeding heart hæmorrhage, which would be a good thing in itself!

Letter to the White Race, ostensibly written from the point of view of a non-white, provides a fair summary of how impotent and defeated Whites have been made to appear.

This is facilitated by decades of brainwashing, beginning in early school years, portraying Whites not as the builders of a great civilization, or the admirable leaders of the Free World, but in a lopsided, entirely slanted way as oppressors, enslavers, genocidal “Nazis”, southern Klansmen, imperialistic Colonials, and toothless hillbillies just itching for a chance to lynch the first colored individual that comes along. This brainwashing not only inflames the minorities in these now racially-mixed “schools”, but also inculcates a sense of “White guilt” that the Out Group finds particularly useful in maintaining control.

Tonight I watched a prime-time television documentary called The Last Lynching:

Just weeks before the history-making 2008 presidential election, the first in which any political party has nominated an African American as its candidate, Discovery Channel presents a one-hour special on race in America. Some commentators are now speaking of a “post-racial” period in American history. While the nation has come a long way on the road toward racial equality, there is still much left to accomplish.

It is a prime example of Out Group brainwashing.

The documentary focuses on a Ku Klux Klan-related murder that took place in Mobile AL in 1981. Ted Koppel, who is jewish, interviews 1960s "freedom rider" and current congressional representative from San Diego, Bob Filner, who is jewish, and the SPLC's founding hate-crusader Morris Dees, who is jewish. The moral of the story: Whites are lynch-happy racists - but we can redeem ourselves by voting for Barack Obama.

Daniel M. Gold writes in his New York Times review: "The past is never dead. It’s not even past." And concludes his critique-free review with this:

In these accounts Mr. Koppel offers inspiration and a tribute to an event — the nomination of a black presidential candidate by a major party — that many had not expected in their lifetime. Yet “The Last Lynching” also conveys how close to the surface racial resentments can lie, and how easily they can be channeled into blind rage. In the end the program is as much cautionary tale as celebration.

Racial resentments indeed. This documentary is an excellent example of anti-White resentments motivating jews to not-so-subtly nurse black victimology and channel black resentments against Whites. When their man doesn't win in November, whose "blind rage" is more likely to spill over? The blacks polling 95-1 for Obama and threatening race riots, or the Whites polling 55-40 for McCain who dare not make a peep about jews like Harold Meyerson who openly say "whiteness is a huge problem".

In The Last Lynching the mendacity begins at the beginning with a cliched glossing over of the history of lynching in America. Quickly flashing images and carefully selected words convey the impression that only blacks were hung, and that none of it was just or warranted. Some 5000 who were lynched between the civil war and the 1930s are described only as "victims" - as if they were all selected at random, or simply because they were black. There is scant mention of the victims whose rape or murder instigated more than a few of the lynchings.

In glossing over this past Koppel even brazenly refers to The Birth of a Nation, a 1915 film that tells a quite different story from his own. Koppel and friends used snippets of the film to flesh out their characterization of hooded Klansmen mindlessly murdering random negroes. They're counting on modern day viewers not to know the film's story and not to know that the Klan rose from the post-war chaos in reaction to the depravities and injustices visited upon southern Whites. As late as 1915 most Whites still knew this history and celebrated the KKK, but even by then racial resentments were brewing:

When Griffith released the film in 1915, the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (or NAACP) and other groups protested; the NAACP published a 47-page pamphlet titled "Fighting a Vicious Film: Protest Against The Birth of a Nation," in which they referred to the film as "three miles of filth." W. E. B. Du Bois published scathing reviews in The Crisis, spurring a heated debate among the National Board of Censorship of Motion Pictures as to whether the film should be shown in New York. However, President and former history professor Woodrow Wilson viewed the film at the White House and proclaimed it not only historically accurate, but like "history writ with lightning." Like Woodrow Wilson, many whites felt it a truthful and accurate portrayal of racial politics, so much so that they flocked to join the rejuvenated Ku Klux Klan. The years after Griffith released The Birth of a Nation saw massive race riots throughout the country, peaking especially in the North in 1919; many historians lay the blame for this racial conflict on Griffith's The Birth of a Nation.

What happened between then and now? Well understanding that the early NAACP was organized, funded, and led by jews helps explain. It seems WEEJs (white eastern European jews) had an axe to grind with the WASP elite. It seems these WASPs were a wee slow in handing over control of the nation their forefathers gave birth to. After almost a century of "culture war" those busy little WEEJs are still grinding away. Today "KKK" is an epithet, and jews are making documentaries to explain how the ever expanding racial conflict they've poured gasoline on is all for the better. The only threat to their utopia are racist Whites itching to once again start lynching at random.

If jewish influence in the media were not so strong, or if jews did not so uniformly resent Whites, then perhaps today's mainstream journalists and pundits would not so strongly and uniformly insist on inverting reality. The reality of post-KKK, post-Jim Crow, post-White, jewish-dominated America is black on White violence:

The Color of Crime
New Century Foundation, 2005

Mapping The Unmentionable: Race And Crime
February 13, 2005
By Steve Sailer

CRIME IN THE HOOD
La Griffe du Lion
November 1999

THE RACE WAR OF BLACK AGAINST WHITE
Paul Sheehan
From the Sydney Morning Herald, May 20, 1995

Guy White calls out "liberal" Tim Wise on his "lying" and "false logic" about this reality. Guy makes sense, except in failing to note that Tim Wise is a jew who makes a living channeling racial resentment towards Whites. Jewish race-based indifference, hostility, and even genocidal feelings toward Whites, no matter how hard we might wish to avert our eyes and pretend jews are "White Like Me", is another harsh reality the media won't discuss.

One final thought.

If an atypical murder from 1981 rates a prime-time documentary, then when might Ted Koppel make a documentary exploring the racial resentments behind the quadruple murder in Wichita, the rape/torture/murder of Christopher Newsom and Channon Christian, or the sickeningly common racial murder and rape of White women in America? When might Bob Filner spend time on a bus or in a jail cell for the benefit of White victims of racial violence? When might Morris Dees hound black rapists and murders in court?

I think they'll get around to these things right after making a documentary guilt-tripping jews for their involvement in the biggest fraud in history.

In other words: never.

UPDATE 15 Oct 2008: The image at the top of this post is a corrected version of the reality-inverting original that was attached to a Slate essay from May titled In Praise of Liberal Guilt - It's not wrong to favor Obama because of race. In that essay Ron Rosenbaum, who is jewish, delivers virtually the same message as Koppel/Filner/Dees: Whites should feel guilty because of slavery, lynching, and Jim Crow. We should feel guilty about it forever. And because of it we should vote for Obama.

He also neglects to address the black on White violence occurring today.

What a coincidence.

We must recognize these attempts to guilt-trip us for events that occurred generations ago, to libel and damn us forever because of the race we are born into. We must recognize that these smears are not only false, they represent attacks made by people who wish us ill.

In 1984 in Æthiopia, one million people starved to death, with another six million at risk of starvation. The BBC began pushing images of starving children to get the public into a state of shock. Liberals such as Bob Geldof organised the Live Aid concerts to raise money. The result was a massive £100 million raised by the general public, with more tax-payers' money given by Government. The money dispatched to Africa was siphoned off by the Marxist regime for funding their war against the people of Æthiopia. However, enough money got through to feed the starving multitude.

The Live Aid campaign prevented a more-or-less natural cull of the excess population of Æthiopia. The masters of heart-rending propaganda at the BBC used every underhand trick to make the British people feel guilty if they didn't give money to feed the hungry. At the same time, millions were unemployed in Great Britain, and sporadic riots were breaking out. The focus of attention on Africa helped take the public gaze away from the ills afflicting the nation. Bob Geldof received a knighthood for his services to the Crown. Indeed, his help in playing on the natural empathy of the British people for the suffering of others allowed the Government to continue its anti-British agenda. The people of Britain, including many of the Live Aid organisers, were manipulated for political gain.

In 2002, four million Africans were in danger of starvation. This included people in South Africa - a nation which had previously been a prosperous nation under European rule, which had helped feed African nations which were under indigenous rule. Again the begging bowls went out, culminating in the 2005 Live8 concerts.

The result of European charity globally, has been to foster a dependency culture in Africa and parts of Asia. Rather than encouraging the people to help themselves, the constant influx of money has bolstered brutal regimes, allowing them to wage war on their own people. Food has become used as a weapon to keep the ordinary people oppressed. Another result is that many more Africans are leaving their homelands to seek the easy life in Europe and kindred lands. These people tend to be the most motivated as they are the ones who put in the effort to leave their lands. This is effectively a drain of the very people who could, if encouraged to stay, help their nations.

The BBC has been a hotbed of Bolshevism since its inception. The propaganda they use to get people to give money to the starving millions is cynically designed to appeal to the heart, not the head. If nature had been allowed to take its course in 1984, one million would have died. This would have saved many more millions who have subsequently died due to hunger or conflict. It would also have sent a message to the people of Africa that they need to take control of their lands, oust the Marxist oppressors and become self-sufficient. Obviously the BBC would not want their brothers-in-Marx to lose control.

The rulers of the New World Order want mass starvation and ignorance as it displaces indigenous populations, leading to civil disruption in the lands to which the emigrants flee. The people of Africa are being used to destroy the social cohesion of Europe, the Americas and other lands. Charities who beg for cash for food are fueling this global catastrophe.

The BBC fund-raiser, Children In Need, is about to begin. Yet again the hard-pressed ordinary people will be made to feel guilty for not being close to starvation. Our nation is one of the most highly taxed in the world. There is no excuse for poverty in the UK. Children In Need claims to be for the benefit of poor families in Great Britain. In reality much of the money goes abroad. Of the money which stays in the country, a substantial proportion goes to unhealthy politically motivated causes, such as funding sex-education (liberal brainwashing) for the very young about the joys of homosexuality and helping Islamic terrorists.

Other charities raise millions for politically correct causes. Oxfam is openly dedicated to giving money to people outside Europe. For those who wish their money to be spent in that way, Oxfam is fine. Cafod is of a similar vein. Cancer Research funds vivisection but is at least honest about this. The problem lies with think-tanks like Common Purpose, and charities such as British Red Cross, Help the Aged, Shelter etc, who purport to look after people in Britain, which to an extent they do, but not exclusively. A lot of money is diverted to politically correct causes which ordinary people would probably not support, and to other countries. Even animal charities are not exempt from corruption and misuse of funds.

How do we deal with this misappropriation of funds? There is a saying 'Charity begins at Home'. This is where it must end too. People need to look after their neighbours, friends and relatives. By building a support network, decent people would be helped keep out of poverty. Unworthy sorts, such as heroin addicts who are given housing, benefits, food parcels etc almost as a reward for their anti-social and criminal lifestyles should be left to either sort their lives out or face the natural consequences.

Ordinary people must refuse to give tax-money to prop up the banking system, fund illegal wars in the Middle East, pay for the European Union and push the Marxist brainwashing of the masses. They must refuse to accept the global warming lie which is being used as a global tax to fund the One-World State. They must gird themselves to say NO when the begging bowls come around. Even giving ten pence to these gangsters is unacceptable. Every penny given pays for your own exploitation.

If government was refused the funding and the permission to engage in political and military atrocities at home and abroad, the taxes which would otherwise go to undermining our society could be used to help our own people. The government gains its power from us. We must take that power back by refusing to give them unquestioning obedience. We must refuse to donate to charities. we can help our own people by being decent citizens. We can look after animals by giving food to the shelters, or housing those we can. We don't need faux-charities who are bleeding us white whilst helping destroy our culture. We are on course to living in a complete dictatorship. The choice is stark - either stand up to the politically correct commissars of the State and their friends with the begging bowls, or accept the absolute tyranny of the New World Order.

Comrades! The hateful BPP are holding a demo in Leeds against gangsta rap cds. They claim that the cds are racist because they call for whites to be killed. This is nonsense. Rap is an art form, and anyway whites who don't conform to the great ANaL deserve to be butchered.

On the 18th October, the ANaL will be holding a demo against these foul beasts. We will have our comrades from Class Wart and AFFE in attendance. I will be stealing a Volvo to pick everyone up. Actually its my brother's Volvo but he's working nights so he won't miss it - that will teach him for joining the enemy and getting a job. Class Wart can sit in the front seat, but I must insist AFFE goes in the back with the dog due to his alternative hygiene. I've got a scented muzzle for the hound so he should be ok. No offence Af!

The plan is that we will meet outside HMV, bash the fash, then march on Holbeck Police Station. Our superior intellects and courageous fight for rap artists will inspire the plebs of Leeds to march with us. We will direct them to attack the Police and bring about revolution in the city. Our comrades in Sheffield will then arrive to take charge of the situation. Yes comrades, it will be our long awaited Red October.

If Socialite Unity want to come, they can squeeze in the boot. See you on the 18th brave Class Warriors!

....

Update: Bad news I'm afraid, Class Wart won't be able to come. His Mum has grounded him for trying to untoilet-train the dog. She is such a capitalist bitch. We wish him success in breaking the poor dog's social conditioning. He pledges to join us on Monday when the revolutionary government is installed. He'll be with about 1pm, but keep that to yourselves as he's supposed to be having a PE lesson.

Kate Dermody of the British People’s Party has organised a demo against racist rap cds, to be held outside the HMV shop in Leeds city centre on the 18th October 2008. Leading up to this demo, Kate Dermody has been purchasing cds, such as Ice Cube’s Death Certificate, which she has then taken to Milgarth Police Station to protest against the racist content of the cds. The Police have told her that the cds are perfectly legal even though they call for the rape and murder of white people. When she asked whether it would be legal for a white band to cover these cds, substituting the word ‘Black’ for ‘White’ she was told it would not be. The official word from West Yorkshire Police is that it is fine for a song to call for whites to be butchered, but it is racist for a song to call for the same treatment of whites!

The politically correct storm troopers of Anti-Fascist Action, Searchlight etc have organised a counter-demo against the BPP. In effect, these alleged anti-racists are to campaign for the sale of racist cds. This exposes their claim to be anti-racist as a lie. They are anti-white.

The AFA counter-demo is about pushing their Marxist agenda, using the race issue as an excuse for violence. With the notorious criminals of Class War backing up AFA (who themselves are advocates of physical violence to censor free speech), the stage is set for street confrontation of the Direct Action variety. Indymedia have even posted a hit-list.

The BPP demonstration has been organised with the Police to fully comply with the law. Attendees from the BPP group have voluntarily agreed to register formally so as to emphasise the desire for the demo to be peaceful. Class War etc have had no such restrictions placed upon them - indeed they have vowed to attack the legal, peaceful, opponents of racist cds. It will be interesting to see how many people are rounded up by the Police, how many people are put into hospital, and most importantly who gets off unscathed and at liberty.

More will be written on this after the 18th.