Beullogeo's

There is a blog dedicated to documenting Charles Johnson's purge of commenters at Little Green Footballs.

The post titled Levi from Queens and the Great Discarded Lizard Chainsaw Massacre of 2008 - Case Study #24 - LGF BANNED AND BLOCKED concerns the banning of several "racists" and "fascists" who dared to speak in favor of "race realists" Lawrence Auster and Ian Jobling.

I left a comment that compared Charles to Auster, noting that they disagree on ethnic European nationalism, but agree on jewish nationalism (it's good), muslim nationalism (it's bad), and silencing anyone who vexes them.

Then Ian Jobling dropped by. He linked an ostensibly pro-"white" manifesto in which he writes:

Carrying on the dismal tradition of American white supremacism, most pro-whites today believe our current racial dispossession is due to Jewish influence on the West, if not actual Jewish conspiracies against whites. However, these tired lies conceal the real dynamics of white dispossession, which has been inflicted by white Gentiles on themselves. While it is true that Jews have been inclined towards highly liberal—that is, leukophobic—beliefs, nevertheless more than 90 percent of white racial liberals are Gentiles. Moreover, that Jewish leukophobia could thrive in America suggests that it was a mere extension of something in our national character. For these reasons, the pro-white movement repudiates anti-Semitism and will resolutely oppose the obsession with Jews that poisons and discredits our cause.

Jobling unequivocally blames Whites and absolves jews for any animosity between us. His is a pro-jewish manifesto cloaking itself in "white". It is cut from the same cloth as Auster's blame-for-the-"majority" protection-for-the-"minority" double-talk:

In my view, the Jewish neoconservatives advance an _ideological_ vision of America, and oppose any notion of a _substantive_ American nation, precisely because they fear that they would not be seen as 100 percent full citizens in it. To this degree, they are still functioning as a self-conscious minority trying to weaken an "oppressive" majority. And the majority, by yielding to the minority's demands, does indeed weaken itself and even puts itself on the path to extinction.

My solution to this dilemma is that the majority must re-discover itself _as_ the majority, and see the minority _as_ the minority. This doesn't mean exclusion, persecution, or loss of rights of the minority.

With "allies" like Jobling and Auster Whites don't need enemies.

UPDATE 24 Oct 2008: Thanks to Guessedworker I see Jobling has answered, after a fashion. In Anti-Semites Stink Up Another Discussion Thread he writes:

I left a comment linking to my blog post on the incident and explaining why I’m not a fascist, hoping I might get a decent discussion of race realism going with the moderates who traffic the site. However, it was not to be: I was immediately set upon by a couple of professional anti-Semites named tanstaafl, who runs the blog Age of Treason, and Greg Polden.

Jobling either doesn't care or is counting on the LGF BANNED thread disappearing, because anyone who's interested can read for themselves who said what and who set upon who.

Jobling adds very little to what's already been said. All he presents here is essentially point-and-sputter. He seems to be hoping LGF BANNED will delete the offending thread now that he has declared it "stinked up". His modus operandus is just like Auster's. What a coincidence.

I will continue to purge my comment queue of all dire ruminations sent in by tanstaafl and his like.

The urge to purge is strong in this one. I consider myself forewarned and thus will only waste time responding here.

The most substantial thing he wrote was in a comment:

Tanstaafl is referring to the fact that moderates like Johnson support Israel, but neither Islamic fundamentalism nor white nationalism. Since all that tanstaafl can see in politics is conflicts between different ethnic interests, or nationalisms, Johnson’s attitude seems completely nonsensical to him and can only be explained as a result of Jewish brainwashing.

However, once you go outside this absurdly narrow view of human motivations and realize that people’s political views are motivated by many different factors, then Johnson’s views make sense, even if you think they are mistaken. What matters most to moderates like Johnson is democratic, Western values. Since they think Israel exemplifies these values, they are pro-Israel. Since they think neither Islamic fundamentalism nor white nationalism are democratic ideologies, moderates are against them. Nationalism really has nothing to do with this preference; values explain them.

Bottom line: A person’s political outlook is rooted in many different factors, such as political ideology, ethnicity, class, and so forth. If you take a simplistic view of human motivations, the world makes no sense to you and leads you to make an ass of yourself in public.

I'm glad to see I got my point across. Yes, I think ethnic/racial interests are important. More important than class or political ideology. Jews are a perfect example. Despite their class, politics, country of residence, or how much Jobling denies being able to notice - jews just can't seem to set aside their ethnocentrism.

I am simplistic. I say flat out that I'm pro-White. Jobling and Auster are more complicated, but in a deceptive way. They present themselves as pro-"white", as "race realists". But they refuse to distinguish between Whites and jews. And they attack Whites who do distinguish, but not jews.

Going on about "democratic, Western values" while calling for political opponents to be silenced is a good way to make an ass of yourself. If Johnson and Jobling think the jewish ethnostate represents "democratic, Western values" then why do they oppose White ethnostates? If jews do not differ from Whites "in any important respect" then I should be able to move to israel and collect welfare, right? What's that? My mother has to be jewish? I don't object. But to demonstrate his consistent values Charles Johnson should either denounce zionists as racists, or he should support White ethno-nationalism like he supports zionism. The latter is especially sensible if he cares for "the West".

I’ve been deleting a lot of pro-MacDonald comments because their authors show no sign of having read the Lieberman article and are thus incapable of expressing an informed opinion. Anti-Semites show their typical dogmatism by leaping to the defense of MacDonald before they even know what the argument against him is.

Jobling seem to realize at some level that the urge to purge is not right. Thus he tries to transfer responsibility for the problem to those expressing the opinions he wishes to suppress. He makes repeated appeals to psychology...say doctor, heal thyself.

I didn't mention MacDonald until Jobling did. I agree with and respect much of what MacDonald has written, but what I think and write doesn't hinge on the truth or falseness of MacDonald's positions.

Yes, trying to convince the Age of Treason types to take a reasonable view of this issue is like trying to teach a monkey table manners. All you’ll get for your pains is faeces thrown at you.

I've taken pains to understand Jobling's arguments and to use his own logic and phraseology in answering and critcizing him. He can call that feces if he likes.

Possibly with the exception of the nomads of the remotest areas of Mongolia, or the junkies of Todmorden, everyone on the planet will be aware that there is a global economic downturn underway. Whether it is the Zionists and their bankers who have engineered this economic crisis, or the downtrodden workers who are being bled white by the aforementioned criminals, virtually everyone is being effected.

Nationalists have long argued that the only way to have a healthy economy is to end unrestricted immigration and repatriate the criminal elements and spongers who have arrived in Europe and kindred lands. Then, and only then, can we break away from the Finance-Capitalist / State-Socialist economy and introduce a Distributist system based on mutual co-operation, not exploitation. Not everyone agrees with this.

The Daily Mail, a typical bleeding heart liberal 'news'paper is decrying the British Government's decision to vet immigrants to weed out the unskilled who would not benefit the economy. In typical liberal style, these arrogant champagne-Marxists have attacked the Government list as being elitist. They use the example of a shortage of Ballerinas to pour scorn on the need for immigrants to have skills. To liberals, culture is a bad thing. They hate the idea of a healthy nation with pride in its culture - the only reason Ballet is seen as elitist is because the sick rulers of this nation encourage the false class system as a means of dividing the people from one another.

The Daily Mail is not alone in its whinging about the unfairness of stopping every featherless biped nesting in soil to which it does not belong. The Socialist Party argues that immigration should be allowed with no limits at all. The loonies of the SP are kindred spirits with the do-gooders of the Mail. They belong to the same internationalist mindset. Of course they have the luxury of not having to survive on the minimum wage, or having to live in areas enriched by their beloved international friends.

The whole quota issue is a red herring. So long as the EU exists, all member states will be subject to potential unlimited immigration from other member states. As one part of the Union becomes prosperous, people from areas in decline will be able to move to it en masse. The result will be to turn Europeans into rootless cosmopolitans, and to turn Europe into a cultural wasteland. Limiting non-Europeans is a side issue.

So what is the solution to mass unemployment and the skills shortage problem? Simply put, a realistic immigration policy, genuine national sovereignty, and education.

In order to have an immigration policy, each nation must become sovereign. That means the termination of the EU and other international super-states. The free nations must then repatriate all non-kindred immigrants. This will lead in some nations to a population shortage. Countries such as England which are heavily populated with non-Europeans will find themselves in a position where there is more work than people to do it. The solution - a policy of tax breaks for larger families, and sterilisation of those unfit to breed. This would reverse the communist programme of dysgenics which has done so much harm to Europeans. Then we must have an education system which elevates the people so no job is unfilled.

I speak of Europeans. Of course other peoples have suffered from internationalism. It is not only Europeans who are afflicted by the constant stream of unassimiable immigrants. The disgusting trade in children in Thailand is funded largely by European perverts. An ethnically based population policy would benefit everyone, of all nations and races.

Of course that would make the liberal bleeding heart hæmorrhage, which would be a good thing in itself!

Letter to the White Race, ostensibly written from the point of view of a non-white, provides a fair summary of how impotent and defeated Whites have been made to appear.

This is facilitated by decades of brainwashing, beginning in early school years, portraying Whites not as the builders of a great civilization, or the admirable leaders of the Free World, but in a lopsided, entirely slanted way as oppressors, enslavers, genocidal “Nazis”, southern Klansmen, imperialistic Colonials, and toothless hillbillies just itching for a chance to lynch the first colored individual that comes along. This brainwashing not only inflames the minorities in these now racially-mixed “schools”, but also inculcates a sense of “White guilt” that the Out Group finds particularly useful in maintaining control.

Tonight I watched a prime-time television documentary called The Last Lynching:

Just weeks before the history-making 2008 presidential election, the first in which any political party has nominated an African American as its candidate, Discovery Channel presents a one-hour special on race in America. Some commentators are now speaking of a “post-racial” period in American history. While the nation has come a long way on the road toward racial equality, there is still much left to accomplish.

It is a prime example of Out Group brainwashing.

The documentary focuses on a Ku Klux Klan-related murder that took place in Mobile AL in 1981. Ted Koppel, who is jewish, interviews 1960s "freedom rider" and current congressional representative from San Diego, Bob Filner, who is jewish, and the SPLC's founding hate-crusader Morris Dees, who is jewish. The moral of the story: Whites are lynch-happy racists - but we can redeem ourselves by voting for Barack Obama.

Daniel M. Gold writes in his New York Times review: "The past is never dead. It’s not even past." And concludes his critique-free review with this:

In these accounts Mr. Koppel offers inspiration and a tribute to an event — the nomination of a black presidential candidate by a major party — that many had not expected in their lifetime. Yet “The Last Lynching” also conveys how close to the surface racial resentments can lie, and how easily they can be channeled into blind rage. In the end the program is as much cautionary tale as celebration.

Racial resentments indeed. This documentary is an excellent example of anti-White resentments motivating jews to not-so-subtly nurse black victimology and channel black resentments against Whites. When their man doesn't win in November, whose "blind rage" is more likely to spill over? The blacks polling 95-1 for Obama and threatening race riots, or the Whites polling 55-40 for McCain who dare not make a peep about jews like Harold Meyerson who openly say "whiteness is a huge problem".

In The Last Lynching the mendacity begins at the beginning with a cliched glossing over of the history of lynching in America. Quickly flashing images and carefully selected words convey the impression that only blacks were hung, and that none of it was just or warranted. Some 5000 who were lynched between the civil war and the 1930s are described only as "victims" - as if they were all selected at random, or simply because they were black. There is scant mention of the victims whose rape or murder instigated more than a few of the lynchings.

In glossing over this past Koppel even brazenly refers to The Birth of a Nation, a 1915 film that tells a quite different story from his own. Koppel and friends used snippets of the film to flesh out their characterization of hooded Klansmen mindlessly murdering random negroes. They're counting on modern day viewers not to know the film's story and not to know that the Klan rose from the post-war chaos in reaction to the depravities and injustices visited upon southern Whites. As late as 1915 most Whites still knew this history and celebrated the KKK, but even by then racial resentments were brewing:

When Griffith released the film in 1915, the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (or NAACP) and other groups protested; the NAACP published a 47-page pamphlet titled "Fighting a Vicious Film: Protest Against The Birth of a Nation," in which they referred to the film as "three miles of filth." W. E. B. Du Bois published scathing reviews in The Crisis, spurring a heated debate among the National Board of Censorship of Motion Pictures as to whether the film should be shown in New York. However, President and former history professor Woodrow Wilson viewed the film at the White House and proclaimed it not only historically accurate, but like "history writ with lightning." Like Woodrow Wilson, many whites felt it a truthful and accurate portrayal of racial politics, so much so that they flocked to join the rejuvenated Ku Klux Klan. The years after Griffith released The Birth of a Nation saw massive race riots throughout the country, peaking especially in the North in 1919; many historians lay the blame for this racial conflict on Griffith's The Birth of a Nation.

What happened between then and now? Well understanding that the early NAACP was organized, funded, and led by jews helps explain. It seems WEEJs (white eastern European jews) had an axe to grind with the WASP elite. It seems these WASPs were a wee slow in handing over control of the nation their forefathers gave birth to. After almost a century of "culture war" those busy little WEEJs are still grinding away. Today "KKK" is an epithet, and jews are making documentaries to explain how the ever expanding racial conflict they've poured gasoline on is all for the better. The only threat to their utopia are racist Whites itching to once again start lynching at random.

If jewish influence in the media were not so strong, or if jews did not so uniformly resent Whites, then perhaps today's mainstream journalists and pundits would not so strongly and uniformly insist on inverting reality. The reality of post-KKK, post-Jim Crow, post-White, jewish-dominated America is black on White violence:

The Color of Crime
New Century Foundation, 2005

Mapping The Unmentionable: Race And Crime
February 13, 2005
By Steve Sailer

CRIME IN THE HOOD
La Griffe du Lion
November 1999

THE RACE WAR OF BLACK AGAINST WHITE
Paul Sheehan
From the Sydney Morning Herald, May 20, 1995

Guy White calls out "liberal" Tim Wise on his "lying" and "false logic" about this reality. Guy makes sense, except in failing to note that Tim Wise is a jew who makes a living channeling racial resentment towards Whites. Jewish race-based indifference, hostility, and even genocidal feelings toward Whites, no matter how hard we might wish to avert our eyes and pretend jews are "White Like Me", is another harsh reality the media won't discuss.

One final thought.

If an atypical murder from 1981 rates a prime-time documentary, then when might Ted Koppel make a documentary exploring the racial resentments behind the quadruple murder in Wichita, the rape/torture/murder of Christopher Newsom and Channon Christian, or the sickeningly common racial murder and rape of White women in America? When might Bob Filner spend time on a bus or in a jail cell for the benefit of White victims of racial violence? When might Morris Dees hound black rapists and murders in court?

I think they'll get around to these things right after making a documentary guilt-tripping jews for their involvement in the biggest fraud in history.

In other words: never.

UPDATE 15 Oct 2008: The image at the top of this post is a corrected version of the reality-inverting original that was attached to a Slate essay from May titled In Praise of Liberal Guilt - It's not wrong to favor Obama because of race. In that essay Ron Rosenbaum, who is jewish, delivers virtually the same message as Koppel/Filner/Dees: Whites should feel guilty because of slavery, lynching, and Jim Crow. We should feel guilty about it forever. And because of it we should vote for Obama.

He also neglects to address the black on White violence occurring today.

What a coincidence.

We must recognize these attempts to guilt-trip us for events that occurred generations ago, to libel and damn us forever because of the race we are born into. We must recognize that these smears are not only false, they represent attacks made by people who wish us ill.

In 1984 in Æthiopia, one million people starved to death, with another six million at risk of starvation. The BBC began pushing images of starving children to get the public into a state of shock. Liberals such as Bob Geldof organised the Live Aid concerts to raise money. The result was a massive £100 million raised by the general public, with more tax-payers' money given by Government. The money dispatched to Africa was siphoned off by the Marxist regime for funding their war against the people of Æthiopia. However, enough money got through to feed the starving multitude.

The Live Aid campaign prevented a more-or-less natural cull of the excess population of Æthiopia. The masters of heart-rending propaganda at the BBC used every underhand trick to make the British people feel guilty if they didn't give money to feed the hungry. At the same time, millions were unemployed in Great Britain, and sporadic riots were breaking out. The focus of attention on Africa helped take the public gaze away from the ills afflicting the nation. Bob Geldof received a knighthood for his services to the Crown. Indeed, his help in playing on the natural empathy of the British people for the suffering of others allowed the Government to continue its anti-British agenda. The people of Britain, including many of the Live Aid organisers, were manipulated for political gain.

In 2002, four million Africans were in danger of starvation. This included people in South Africa - a nation which had previously been a prosperous nation under European rule, which had helped feed African nations which were under indigenous rule. Again the begging bowls went out, culminating in the 2005 Live8 concerts.

The result of European charity globally, has been to foster a dependency culture in Africa and parts of Asia. Rather than encouraging the people to help themselves, the constant influx of money has bolstered brutal regimes, allowing them to wage war on their own people. Food has become used as a weapon to keep the ordinary people oppressed. Another result is that many more Africans are leaving their homelands to seek the easy life in Europe and kindred lands. These people tend to be the most motivated as they are the ones who put in the effort to leave their lands. This is effectively a drain of the very people who could, if encouraged to stay, help their nations.

The BBC has been a hotbed of Bolshevism since its inception. The propaganda they use to get people to give money to the starving millions is cynically designed to appeal to the heart, not the head. If nature had been allowed to take its course in 1984, one million would have died. This would have saved many more millions who have subsequently died due to hunger or conflict. It would also have sent a message to the people of Africa that they need to take control of their lands, oust the Marxist oppressors and become self-sufficient. Obviously the BBC would not want their brothers-in-Marx to lose control.

The rulers of the New World Order want mass starvation and ignorance as it displaces indigenous populations, leading to civil disruption in the lands to which the emigrants flee. The people of Africa are being used to destroy the social cohesion of Europe, the Americas and other lands. Charities who beg for cash for food are fueling this global catastrophe.

The BBC fund-raiser, Children In Need, is about to begin. Yet again the hard-pressed ordinary people will be made to feel guilty for not being close to starvation. Our nation is one of the most highly taxed in the world. There is no excuse for poverty in the UK. Children In Need claims to be for the benefit of poor families in Great Britain. In reality much of the money goes abroad. Of the money which stays in the country, a substantial proportion goes to unhealthy politically motivated causes, such as funding sex-education (liberal brainwashing) for the very young about the joys of homosexuality and helping Islamic terrorists.

Other charities raise millions for politically correct causes. Oxfam is openly dedicated to giving money to people outside Europe. For those who wish their money to be spent in that way, Oxfam is fine. Cafod is of a similar vein. Cancer Research funds vivisection but is at least honest about this. The problem lies with think-tanks like Common Purpose, and charities such as British Red Cross, Help the Aged, Shelter etc, who purport to look after people in Britain, which to an extent they do, but not exclusively. A lot of money is diverted to politically correct causes which ordinary people would probably not support, and to other countries. Even animal charities are not exempt from corruption and misuse of funds.

How do we deal with this misappropriation of funds? There is a saying 'Charity begins at Home'. This is where it must end too. People need to look after their neighbours, friends and relatives. By building a support network, decent people would be helped keep out of poverty. Unworthy sorts, such as heroin addicts who are given housing, benefits, food parcels etc almost as a reward for their anti-social and criminal lifestyles should be left to either sort their lives out or face the natural consequences.

Ordinary people must refuse to give tax-money to prop up the banking system, fund illegal wars in the Middle East, pay for the European Union and push the Marxist brainwashing of the masses. They must refuse to accept the global warming lie which is being used as a global tax to fund the One-World State. They must gird themselves to say NO when the begging bowls come around. Even giving ten pence to these gangsters is unacceptable. Every penny given pays for your own exploitation.

If government was refused the funding and the permission to engage in political and military atrocities at home and abroad, the taxes which would otherwise go to undermining our society could be used to help our own people. The government gains its power from us. We must take that power back by refusing to give them unquestioning obedience. We must refuse to donate to charities. we can help our own people by being decent citizens. We can look after animals by giving food to the shelters, or housing those we can. We don't need faux-charities who are bleeding us white whilst helping destroy our culture. We are on course to living in a complete dictatorship. The choice is stark - either stand up to the politically correct commissars of the State and their friends with the begging bowls, or accept the absolute tyranny of the New World Order.

Comrades! The hateful BPP are holding a demo in Leeds against gangsta rap cds. They claim that the cds are racist because they call for whites to be killed. This is nonsense. Rap is an art form, and anyway whites who don't conform to the great ANaL deserve to be butchered.

On the 18th October, the ANaL will be holding a demo against these foul beasts. We will have our comrades from Class Wart and AFFE in attendance. I will be stealing a Volvo to pick everyone up. Actually its my brother's Volvo but he's working nights so he won't miss it - that will teach him for joining the enemy and getting a job. Class Wart can sit in the front seat, but I must insist AFFE goes in the back with the dog due to his alternative hygiene. I've got a scented muzzle for the hound so he should be ok. No offence Af!

The plan is that we will meet outside HMV, bash the fash, then march on Holbeck Police Station. Our superior intellects and courageous fight for rap artists will inspire the plebs of Leeds to march with us. We will direct them to attack the Police and bring about revolution in the city. Our comrades in Sheffield will then arrive to take charge of the situation. Yes comrades, it will be our long awaited Red October.

If Socialite Unity want to come, they can squeeze in the boot. See you on the 18th brave Class Warriors!

....

Update: Bad news I'm afraid, Class Wart won't be able to come. His Mum has grounded him for trying to untoilet-train the dog. She is such a capitalist bitch. We wish him success in breaking the poor dog's social conditioning. He pledges to join us on Monday when the revolutionary government is installed. He'll be with about 1pm, but keep that to yourselves as he's supposed to be having a PE lesson.

Kate Dermody of the British People’s Party has organised a demo against racist rap cds, to be held outside the HMV shop in Leeds city centre on the 18th October 2008. Leading up to this demo, Kate Dermody has been purchasing cds, such as Ice Cube’s Death Certificate, which she has then taken to Milgarth Police Station to protest against the racist content of the cds. The Police have told her that the cds are perfectly legal even though they call for the rape and murder of white people. When she asked whether it would be legal for a white band to cover these cds, substituting the word ‘Black’ for ‘White’ she was told it would not be. The official word from West Yorkshire Police is that it is fine for a song to call for whites to be butchered, but it is racist for a song to call for the same treatment of whites!

The politically correct storm troopers of Anti-Fascist Action, Searchlight etc have organised a counter-demo against the BPP. In effect, these alleged anti-racists are to campaign for the sale of racist cds. This exposes their claim to be anti-racist as a lie. They are anti-white.

The AFA counter-demo is about pushing their Marxist agenda, using the race issue as an excuse for violence. With the notorious criminals of Class War backing up AFA (who themselves are advocates of physical violence to censor free speech), the stage is set for street confrontation of the Direct Action variety. Indymedia have even posted a hit-list.

The BPP demonstration has been organised with the Police to fully comply with the law. Attendees from the BPP group have voluntarily agreed to register formally so as to emphasise the desire for the demo to be peaceful. Class War etc have had no such restrictions placed upon them - indeed they have vowed to attack the legal, peaceful, opponents of racist cds. It will be interesting to see how many people are rounded up by the Police, how many people are put into hospital, and most importantly who gets off unscathed and at liberty.

More will be written on this after the 18th.

One of the great yarns of the shoah-business is that Rabbis in Auschwitz put God on trial and found him guilty. Professional 'Survivor' Elie Weasel has admitted that this blasphemy actually occurred. He told guests at a Holocaust Educational Trust dinner in London on Monday the 29th September that the Rabbis came to the verdict that God owes them for the ordeal of being locked up in the Auschwitz relocation camp. Talk about chutzpah!

Another great tale concerns Moshe Peer who was gassed 6 times - and survived! So much for German efficiency - or is the story perhaps a little, ahem, untrue?