|
|---|
Showing posts with label feminism. Show all posts
Showing posts with label feminism. Show all posts
Wednesday, 27 October 2010
Family is the fundamental building block of society. A real family consisting of a Husband, Wife and Child (or Children) provides a barrier against the intrigues of the State. Fidelity is the keystone of the family. In order for the Establishment to destroy all opposition to its machinations, Family must be destroyed.The natural role for a man is to protect his wife and offspring. The natural role of a woman is to look after her husband and any children. The media have pushed the lie that adultery is OK in order to weaken the bonds between a man and his wife. Women and Men who seek sexual gratification outside the family are enemies of society and indeed of humanity.
Women have been especially targeted by the Establishment. The media teaches them that they are merely objects and that their every concern should be material. Whether it is buying clothes which fit a prepared stereotype (trendy, Goth or other), or spending hours studying make-up and 'perfecting' a certain look, women have become victims of a system which reduces them to consumers and to little more than showroom dummies. Men are not immune from this, albeit to a lesser degree (at least for now).
The result of turning a woman into an object who is obsessed with her appearance, is to focus her sense of identity and worth into a purely materialistic area. This distances her from her family and causes friction when the process of putting on make up takes so long that it impinges on family activities. For example, taking three hours to put on make up when a family activity is planned leads to the time available for the activity being shortened, if not in fact resulting in the activity not happening at all. The child suffers, the husband is made to feel as if all his plans are of less importance than staring into the mirror, and the family relationship is damaged. Should this become a regular occurrence, planning excursions becomes seen as pointless and thus begins the slide into inactivity and frustration.
Women are conditioned to emulate pop stars, who are nothing more than glorified prostitutes. Modern pop music (whether R&B, Goth or whatever) is built upon the use of repetitive lyrics which act as a form of mind control. Lyrics which speak of sexual promiscuity implant in the mind of the listener the acceptance of promiscuity. Lyrics which speak of hatred of men and of the desirability of self-harm condition the listener to self hatred and hatred of others. These sick distortions of normality push the listener into a position of confusion and split identity. It is from such evil that schizophrenia and bi-polar disorder take root. Whether the medium used to break the spirit and mind of the individual is in musical form or in visual form, the result is an undeniable destruction of the self.
By implanting a diseased outlook in the minds of women, and undermining the traditional roles of men, the anti-family (so-called Feminist) Establishment has laid the seeds for the crushing of the family. By creating the conditions in which friction becomes inevitable, the door is open to further State interference for the breaking of the family. It is at this point that the Establishments role in destroying the Family takes a lead overt role.
Hiding behind the lie of being for the protection of abused women, Women's Centres exist to facilitate the break up of families. It is illegal for a man to assault his wife or children, and quite rightly so, thus the idea that Women's Refuges are vital to protect women is a lie. Refuges can be accessed by any woman who claims her husband has caused her stress. For a bi-polar woman who cannot get herself away from the mirror, it is a matter of time before her husband complains about her self absorption. Furthermore, when the woman self-harms and puts her child in danger, it is not only inevitable, but morally right for the husband to take charge and become the dominant member of the family. This natural and healthy reaction to the self-harming of a loved one is a matter of defence of the family, not, as the Establishment claim, a matter of abuse and control freakery.
When a woman who is in a weakened mental state enters a Women's Refuge, egged on by Social Workers and other Establishment family haters, the husband is denied knowledge of her whereabouts. This removes the father from his child. Once the Feminist man-haters have her in their grasp, they push anti-male propaganda on her, disguised as literature to help women. The assault on the mind of the woman is near completion. Attempts are then made to turn the woman lesbian, and should that fail, the pre-programmed pro-adultery sickness is activated. A man separated from his wife and child is less likely to seek a reconciliation if his wife is having sex with an opportunist male who is himself a product of the anti-family sex-obsessed media.
Now that the family is broken, the woman is given access to free legal services and encouraged to divorce her husband. She is promised that the hard working husband will be stripped of his financial assets and if he owns a home, will have to sell it and give his adulterous wife half the proceeds. Thus what would in normal society be an easily resolved argument, becomes a devastating assault on the family leading to a child without a father, a husband without a child or home, and a mother turned into a financial and physical whore.
Thus is life in feminised modern England and indeed most countries of the west. So long as these feminist enemies of decency and tradition have any power at all, the hopes of saving our nations from the all powerful materialism of the anti-human internationalists, are slim indeed.
Men and women need to unite and fight this feminist assault. The only solution to our sick society is a return to traditionalism, to the sanctity of marriage, and to the overthrowal of so called Social Services. Adultery is not a right, but a disease created by the Establishment, and for this evil the Establishment must pay the ultimate price.
Friday, 16 October 2009
Fashion is a word which seems inoccuos enough. At face value, the manipulation of the vanity of people who are so vacuous as to seriously believe that how they look is the be-all and end-all of their existence, seems to be a sad indictment of the self-obsession of the individuals in question. However, the curse of fashion should not be so readily dismissed. Fashion goes beyond clothing, hairstyles, and other such material matters, and is indeed a problem which must be addressed by anyone who has the desire to understand how our oppressors control the societies we live in, and who wish to use this knowledge to undermine this control and free us all from this menace.When we think of fashion, we tend to think only in terms of physical appearance. From the ridiculous flared trousers of the 1960s to the revolting tracksuits tucked into socks of the 2000's, it is easy to regard fashion as comical - but is it? Is it really a source of amusement that chronologically adult people dress themselves in the manner of circus performers at the command of an industry which revels in the ability to make allegedly sensible people reduce themselves to figures of ridicule - and to put themselves into debt in order to do so?
The phenomenon of fashion is worthy of study as it is clearly displays the strategy of our rulers in containing all the options available to the manipulated populace. For example, the mainstream fashion for girls may consist of the 'cheer-leader' or slutty look, with the fashion for those who reject the mainstream being the 'goth' or dyke look. Those who have the intelligence to see through the manipulation of the overt media are neatly herded into the camp of those who refuse to buy the designer label and TV-endorsed look. Far from expressing their individuality and freedom from the manipulators, they reveal that they too are falling in line with the mind controllers. Dressing in black and spiking one's hair may cause a reaction of indignation which serves to satisfy the desire to feel as if one is in rebellion against the system, but it is a completely controlled rebellion - ie no rebellion at all. When the punk group Crass stated that Punk was dead, they were referring to this manipulation - sadly the devotees of Crass, Conflict etc who confine their rebellion to clothing, music and repeating lyrics which they haven't bothered to examine, have fallen into the trap of becoming a part of the controlled opposition.
Fashion in music is an interesting arena. Unless one lives on a remote mountain top, with no radio or television, and no need to visit what passes for civilisation, one cannot escape exposure to what the establishment laughingly class as music. Nearly every shop, pub, cafe etc pumps out the music of the establishment. Whether it is the sexually explicit boy band and girl band material, or it is the controlled anger of the tailor-made false rebels, there is almost no break from the relentless aural assault on the senses of the passive listener.
What does it matter that the people have bread and circuses to keep them occupied? What else would the masses do if they didn't have their sensory pleasures catered for? Perhaps, just perhaps, they would begin to think for themselves and to see the world for how it really is, and not for how they have been conditioned to see it. What does is matter that pop culture is manufactured and all pervasive? Well, it matters precisely because it is all pervasive.
Pop music is targeted at children. Why? They are not economically independent, so the motive goes beyond material greed. Sexually explicit lyrics and calls to reject the authority of parents are not in the majority of songs played on the radio by mere chance. These lyrics are placed in the public realm deliberately. It is a much researched fact that repetition is a key method of brainwashing. Radio stations have a limited number of songs which they play over and over. The result is to place in the mind of the listener an attitude which is beneficial to the establishment. The ruling powers need to atomise society to the point where there are no familial ties and there is no respect between individuals and generations. What better way to destroy the natural order of a healthy society than to implant in the minds of its youth the idea that (as Mrs Thatcher stated in the 1980s) 'there is no society, only the individual'? Children sing about the primacy of the individual, the importance of being popular, about hatred of family, about love being an illusion, about meaningless anonymous sex with every man, woman, and animal being a positive thing. This self-brainwashing then transfers into reality - destroying the family, spreading selfishness and perversion, and giving authority to the establishment to the detriment of wholesome and natural structures.
Fashion goes beyond the material into every aspect of life. Religion for example has been subjected to the ceaseless assault of the politically motivated doyens of anti-morality. Before Vatican II, even Anglicans looked to homosexuality and abortion as examples of spiritual decay. Now the Anglican 'church' has openly homosexual priests, and has quietly dropped the last of the Christian principles it once held. Anglicanism has always been a heretical cult which has been a front for anti-Christian beliefs, so to see the facade drop is not that surprising. However the Holy Roman Church has mirrored its Anglican counterpart by embracing all manner of apostasy in order to appear 'with it' and fashionable. Only a few years ago one could expect to be given Hail Marys and Our Fathers to recite as penance for confessed sins, but that now has been dropped by the modernisers - it seems even God must conform to the whims of the dictators of fashion.
In politics, traditionalism and respect for country is laughed at - except when the establishment require patriotism to bolster their homicidal wars of aggression. This cynical manipulation of the feelings of the public is gently pushed by the 'news' media, who select which stories to tell to the public, and in reality create the news. At present it is fashionable to be pro-war, to 'support the troops' (the images of British soldiers murdering defenceless civilian in criminally occupied lands children and babies are hidden from the public gaze) and to love US President Obama (whose subservience to the globalist agenda and betrayal of the USA, perversion, drug addiction and blood lust never gets mentioned). Only a few years ago, flying the Union Jack in England was classed as racist - now failing to do so is unpatriotic. - so easily are the people swayed by the fear of being 'different' and out of step. In truth the Union Jack is an imperialist rag which when one understands its significance as a symbol of the Monarchy and their Zionist criminal brethren, deserves only to be burned whenever one comes across it.
Fashion has come to be an indicator of the power of the establishment. What is the reaction one gets when one is critical of the sexualisation of children, or the contrived immigration of unassimiable aliens for the benefit of the economic elite? Are the arguments in favour of morality, decency, protection of children, defence of family, the primacy of the spiritual over materialism, the halt to degeneracy and decadence etc... are these arguments met with reasoned discussion? No! Those who uphold morality and decency are immediately labelled as 'old-fashioned' are by the application of this label, all debate is prevented!
We need to confront this farce and reject the pressure to conform to fashion. We are right to defend our people and to expose the enemy. Being out of step and out of fashion with the sickening Zionist cult which is destroying the world is no source of shame, but rather of pride.
Fashion is just another word for thought control. Resist it.
Wednesday, 13 August 2008
We now have a situation where a young woman can get a house and a steady liveable income if she has a child on her own. If she has a husband or lives with her boyfriend she will get nothing. As a result many women aged 16+ are choosing single motherhood as a way to get a house and all the material benefits. It is not unusual for a woman to split up with her man and sneak him into the house unofficially - however if she is caught trying to have a traditional family, she will lose all the benefits and be prosecuted - with the state taking her child/children into 'care.'
'Care' is in reality a horrendous institution where children are routinely physically, sexually and mentally abused - many go on to be abusers, criminals and junkies.
The collapse of the family has come about since the introduction of the Marxist Welfare State. It has become an epidemic since the 'sexual revolution' of the nineteen sixties wherein women were taught that they didn't need men and men were taught that women were merely for sexual gratification. The result is women are either stuck in the Welfare System or are forced to work and hand their children over to strangers in a crèche. Men have been reduced to sex-obsessed animals that abandon their children to single mums and live irresponsible, pointless, selfish, degenerate lives. The children have no role models other than footballers or fashion models (some role models!) and society is being ripped apart.
None of this would have been possible had the fake Feminist Movement not had such success in destroying the traditional family. A Man used to have a function - as Husband, Father and provider of material needs. A Woman had the function of Mother, Wife, and provider of non-material sustenance. Children were cared for and loved and set good examples of how to behave.
I do not for one moment suggest that Women are inferior to Men. They are of equal worth. Men and women and are only truly at their best when together as a strong bonded couple. Feminism has split Men from Women and from Children. The results are that Britain is a sick nation. The American Dream is to be rich. The British Dream is to escape from Britain and its diseased anti-family 'culture'.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
