Beullogeo's

How can one tell when a public figure is good for his or her country? Very simply, the Establishment media will castigate that person, concoct all manner of vile lies against him or her, and then use the robots of the military to smash said individual. Such as with the heinous crimes perpetrated against Saddam Hussein and the people of Iraq, the latest victim of globalist tyranny is the honourable Libyan regime headed (so we are told) by Colonel Muammar al-Qaddafi.

The liars in Westminster who - lest we forget - justified the carnage in Iraq with the faery tale of 'Weapons of Mass Destruction' are now ceaselessly jabbering about how the government in Libya is anti-democratic and how 'we' must save them - by raping their economy and butchering their population.

What is the truth about the leader of Libya? Well, for a start, he is the titular head of the nation, but unlike the tyrant of Buckingham Palace, he has no real power. So much for the 'mad dictator' we hear about. Far from being the enemy of the people, Qaddafi is revered as the beloved 'Great Brother, Leader of the Revolution'. More than any African figure, he has consistently promoted peace and prosperity for the continent, arguing that its destiny lies in wrenching itself free from foreign imperialism. Qadaffi is a fervent supporter of Arab unity, and stands unwaveringly against Zionism. However, he is not a supporter of religious extremism, as the biased globalist media would have it. (Odd how Zionism is never portrayed as extreme...)

We are told that Qadaffi is a monster and a despot, and that the people of Libya live in fear. This is pure propaganda nonsense. Far from being a dictator, Qadaffi is an advocate of genuine popular rule. In his 'Green Book' he accurately describes western-style democracy as a trick by which rule is given over to "a dictatorship in the seat of power garbed in the guise of democracy...democracy can only exist with the presence of the people, and not in the presence of representatives of the people. Parliaments have become a legal barrier between people and their right to exercise authority. They exclude the masses in order to prevent them from practicing politics, and monopolise the control of politics in their name...the people are prey fought over by the predators: instruments of government compete in their power struggle for the votes of the people they in turn neglect and exploit...In order to rule, the opposition party must defeat the existing instrument of government. To do so, the opposition must undermine the government’s achievements and cast doubt on its plans, even if these plans were beneficial to society, to prove the incompetence of the current governing instrument. Consequently, the interests and programmes of society become victims of the power struggle raging among the political parties". How true.

Qadaffi does not merely highlight the fallacy of Western Democracy, he offers an alternative. His Third Universal Theory outlines the essential qualities of Direct Democracy. He argues for the establishment of Popular Congresses comprised of all the people in each locality. These Congresses feed into the National Government and provide the people with the power to govern themselves. The smoke and mirrors of Western Democracy are done away with and replaced by Direct Rule by the people. This necessitates a focus upon Social Justice for all and the centrality of Family as the most important part of the nation. This rejection of materialism is perhaps what has prompted the imperialist aggression which Libya is now enduring. The Libyan system puts people above profits, sees the socialisation of the national infrastructure as vital to guarantee the survival of the nation and rejects destructive internationalist practices such as unlimited immigration and multi-culturalism. The Third Universal Theory is the solution to political Correctness. It is the worst nightmare of the Zionist-Masonic anti-human worldview.

So, how has Libya fared under the guidance of Qaddafi? Until the sadistic barbarians of NATO (led by the British Establishment and its military puppet, the USA) started bombing Libya, the nation had the highest standard of living in all of Africa, the strongest sense of culture, the lowest infant mortality rate and highest life expectancy in Africa, ranked 61st in the Global league for percentage of population incarcerated and, unlike 'civilised' England, had no taxation on food whatsoever. Such was the strength of the economy, that massive numbers of migrant workers were required for the national social development programmes and general production. Because foreign ownership of oil production is forbidden, Libya is rich - with oil revenue being equally distributed amongst the general population for the good of all. Contrast this with Scotland where the oil companies make a fortune and many Scots live below the poverty line and eek out an existence rather than a fruitful life. Scenes on CNN and the BBC of people fleeing across the border into Tunisia have been manipulated to produce the idea that Libyans are escaping the Qadaffi regime. In truth the people leaving are guest workers fleeing the NATO murderers.

Qadaffi wrote prophetically in the Green Book about the importance of national homogeneity. The tribal eruption in the east of Libya is precisely what he warned against. However, the tribes of the east did not spontaneously rise up against the government in Tripoli, nor is their campaign one of cessation as would be expected if the 'rebels' were genuinely seeking independence. What is the truth of these 'rebels'? It should come as no surprise that the rebels are mostly foreign in origin and entirely controlled by foreign interests, notably the unholy trinity of UK-USA-Israel. Why would foreign interests wish to destabilise the most cultured, civilised, prosperous and peaceful country in Africa? There are several reasons:

So, what of the people of Libya? Far from rising up against Qadaffi (who of course is really a ceremonial head of state, as power resides with the people), they are courageously fighting back against the internationalist invaders. Civilians are being armed so they can defend themselves, their familes, their nation and their way of life. Was Qadaffi truly a dictator he would be taking their weapons away from them, not arming them. Is it not interesting that the regimes in Washington and London are ceaselessly disarming the populations they rule over, but 'tyrant' Qadaffi is arming his countrymen?

The controlled opposition and the internationalist invaders are fighting a war of aggression against the common people of Libya in order to subjugate them to the will of the internationalist machine. The inhumanity of the aggressors can be seen in the use of depleted uranium tipped missiles, which cause all the ailments associated with radiation poisoning. Libya will become a nuclear wasteland, just as has Iraq and other victims of the materialist menace.

What is to be done about this? Quite simply, the truth must be told. Copies of the Green Book should be distributed to undermine the lies of the Establishment (print a copy for yourself HERE). We must stand in solidarity with our brothers and sisters in Libya against the war machine. If you are in the military, you must refuse to fight for the enemies of humanity - should this necessitate mutiny against your superiors to the point of armed revolt, so be it. Enough is enough. What the butchers of NATO are doing to Libya today they will do soon enough to all who resist absolute slavery. Take a stand. Fight for national freedom and social justice. Do not pay taxation to the tyrants in Westminster, Bruxelles, Washington etc. Say no to their laws and refuse to recognise their authority.

Bring the military home. No more wars for economic conquest, imperialism or politics. The military should be for defence only. If we tolerate this we deserve the serfdom and suffering which awaits us.