Beullogeo's

Around the world, political correctness is replacing common sense. Organisations such as Common Purpose exist in most nations, with the shared goal being to the creation of a single bureaucratic system at the administrative level. This uniform bureaucracy is the instrument for the implementation of Fabianism which seeks to replace freedom of speech with absolute self-censorship, and freedom of thought with no thought whatsoever.

Much has been written about the intrigues of Common Purpose and the horrendous effects of Political Correctness and the Communitarian ideology. There is a belief that those within the system are willing accomplices. In some instances this is true, but for many, the opposite is the case. As someone who works from within the beast, I would like to share my typical daily experience.

My working day begins as does most people's, save only for most people inflicting upon their minds the poison of television. I leave my house and join the herd of indentured slaves who comprise the workforce. Like my fellow drones I am monitored for most of my journey by the sea of cameras atop the traffic lights which impede my progress along the road. In addition, as I enter the legal and financial district (interestingly based in the same area, betraying the truth of who controls the nation), my car is filmed by hundreds of CCTV cameras. This surveillance continues right up to the door of the building I work in. I could add that for many of my colleagues, this surveillance is reinforced by the GPS in their in-car satellite navigation and mobile telephones (or as Americans call them, 'cells').

Upon entering the building I am filmed by the internal monitoring system. The mass of cameras are fitted with microphones, adding a further dimension to the level of intrusion. For the entire day, not only will my every move be filmed, but my every word will be recorded. Like every other member of staff, I have a security door operator which contains my unique identification information. This, alike all the other measures, is ostensibly a device for heightening the level of security afforded the building, in order to protect the sensitive data held on the general public who are engaged with this particular aspect of the State. However, are the public really protected by the monitoring of how many times I visit the kitchen to make a drink, or how often, and for how long I visit the toilet? Every door is fitted with a security lock which is operated by an electronic i.d. recogniser - this is but another surveillance gathering mechanism. Before taking up my post, I have to sign in - further enhancing the level of data as to my activities. This replication of submission to surveillance is a psychological weapon for ensuring that at no time during the day does anyone forget that he or she is being monitored.

Although not a daily occurrence, meetings are a very common feature of the working week. At these, the current policy from Central Government is passed down. This changes weekly (if not more often) and affects the very minutiae of work. This ensures that no-one can become comfortable in the workplace, and that everyone is alert to the fact that no decisions can be made without recourse to higher levels of the bureaucratic chain. Policy reversals are continuous and concern every imaginable aspect of work. This ensures a complete sense of powerlessness, regardless of the position of the worker in the structure.

Meetings invariably incorporate a degree of 'training' which rather than being training to improve the ability to deliver a quality service to the public, tends to be a further spoon-feeding of political correctness. Recent examples of this have been sessions on 'negative words' which cause hurt and offence. Even staff who have no direct contact with the public are forced to endure such tedium. Needless to say, staff are monitored to ensure that forbidden words are not uttered. The negative impact of this upon worker morale is tangible. Such is the intrusive surveillance that aside from the extremists on the staff who embrace such lunacy (mainly because being such types as benefit from it), that open criticism of political correctness is commonplace, albeit qualified so as to not invite disciplinary measures. Doublespeak has mutated within the public sector into a manner for discussing its stupidity without referring to it directly.

Back in the office, the surveillance continues. The computer system is set up so as to allow remote viewing of every computer, in much the same way as the CCTV can be remotely viewed via secure internet connections. This ensures that workers only use the computers for work. This is of course reasonable. However, the monitoring is not restricted to work time, and even though staff are allowed to use the internet before work, or during breaks, the monitoring continues at all times. The result of this is that personal emails are recorded, as are visits to social sites such as Facebook. Up until recently, random checks of internet use were sporadic, making internet usage relatively safe. This has now been replaced by complete recording of all activity. Personally I no longer use the internet at all at work, and in this I am not alone. Resentment to the Big Brother State is growing within the belly of the beast itself.

So what is to be made of this surveillance and attempted political indoctrination? Ironically, the more the State removes power to make decisions, the more it shifts policy so as to remove any sense of solid purpose, the more is encroaches on the privacy of the staff, so the more easy it makes the overthrowal of the politically despotic regime.

There is a myth that Civil Servants and other public sector employees are politically neutral. For practical purposes, with regards to the daily working environment, this myth is for the most part a reality. There are certainly a few agitators who take every opportunity to advance their philosophical positions, but in the main, most of the workers keep their opinions private. The typical public servant is so used to policy changing with no reason given, that whatever is desired by the State is implemented. Therein lies the flexibility of the system, and the weakness of the internationalist mafia who presently preside over the central authority in Bruxelles and its provincial arm in London. I suspect the same can be said in most countries.

I have written repeatedly about how dire our situation is. However, we must not get despondent. The beauty of bureaucracy is that the control freakery from on high is so pervasive that it generates hostility at every level of the chain. An administration which relaxed the controls and allowed for the workers to use common sense in decision making would be welcomed by the public sector as a whole. The hated Communitarian system would collapse overnight once the despots at the top were removed. No public servant (with the exception of the rabid Marxist minority) would be sad to see the ideology of the internationalist criminals overturned. For some it would simply be another change in policy, for many it would be a welcome return to sanity.

The system seems to be a solid immovable force, against which there is no hope. Nothing could be farther from the truth. There is too much despair and fear-mongering amongst the defenders of freedom and decency. We need to take another look at what we are fighting. It appears to be immovable because that is the propaganda that it pushes through its collaborators and stooges (such as Alex Jones for example). Our enemy is only powerful in image. Without our support it is nothing. Take hope and strength in the knowledge that the un-natural situation we are enduring is hated by those who work within the system as much as any other sector of society. We can permanently banish political correctness and internationalism once we accept that the tiger is made of paper.

Take hope. The power of our enemy is an illusion. We have real power. We can, and must, win.