Beullogeo's

The following comes from issue 43 of the British nationalist electronic newsletter, National Front News (27th February 2010)

"A WHITE AFRICA – NF FOREIGN POLICY

"In the last issue of National Front News (No.42), we covered some projected aspects for the establishment of a new White Commonwealth of Nations to replace the disastrous EU experiment which is robbing our nation of its sovereignty. We mentioned in that piece about the number of White people born and brought up and still living in Africa and for the most part, of British descent. There are over seven and a half million White folk in Africa. Three per cent of South Africa’s population is White. For the most part, the whole technological infrastructure of ‘The Dark Continent’ has been built and maintained by White Africans. Mugabe is finding out about that to his and his Black population’s cost as he disenfranchise and brutalises the White Rhodesians still living and working in ‘Zimbabwe’. The NF’s proposal vis-à-vis the White Africans is that using economic inducement, we could persuade the various tin pot countries in Black Africa to set aside a large area of the Continent to which White Africans could move too. This WHITE AFRICA would then be offered a place in the NF’s White Commonwealth of Nations. This is a reasonable and economically viable solution to the millions of White Africans and will ensure their safety, livelihood and a future for their children separate from the ever-emerging Black Nations of which they are now a reluctant part of.

"Break down of White Africans at the moment: White African Population by Country (Approximates) - South Africa: 5,265,300 (as of July 2008). Namibia: 124,000 - 160,000.Mozambique: 30,000. Zimbabwe: 23,000. Kenya: 24,000. Angola: 7,000. Zambia: 8,000. Botswana: 7,000. Senegal: 5,000 . Other African nations: 10,000-25,000.

"Let us build this White Africa policy into overall NF Foreign Policy. "

The article exhibits a complete lack of understanding of the reality of power dynamics in the twentyfirst century. Referring to the previous issue, the writer expresses the National Front's desire for 'the establishment of a new White Commonwealth of Nations to replace the disastrous EU experiment which is robbing our nation of its sovereignty.' Since December 2009 British sovereignty has ceased to exist - the territories of the British Isles are regions within the nation known as the European Union. As for taking Britain out of the EU and into a Commonwealth comprised of the white nations of former British Empire (Canada, Australia, New Zealand), the writer obviously hasn't taken into account the fact that Canada is even more under the heel of the Zionist mafia than Britain is. Also, this spokesman of the NF assumes that the people of sovereign nations which were until relatively recently controlled by the internationalist elite in London, would be happy to give up their independence and to once again take orders from the British Establishment. Considering the abuse meted out to the ordinary people of every nation which has been dominated by the Monarchies of Europe and their Zionist bankers, this assumption is in the realm of the bizarre - and also indicative of an unhealthy subservience to a despotic elite which has done nothing but harm to the common man and woman within the British Isles themselves.

The article takes a position which is untenable for a number of reasons. Firstly, there is the idea that because a large number of Europeans live in South Africa, this justifies the presence of a non-African colony on African soil. This belief is a dangerous one as it justifies the existence of alien colonies due to reasons of the number of people in the colony. This could be used to justify the Netherlands being given over to Muslims due to the demographic increase in Muslim births and the decline in the Dutch birthrate - or for that matter, in England, the cities of London and Leicester by this argument should be recognised as non-English due to the ethnic cleansing of the indigenous population. Likewise, the Serbian province of Kosovo, and the neighbouring territories of Bosnia, Herzegovina, and nearby Albania should, using National Front logic, be incorporated into the Islamic sphere with the White Christian indigenous population abandoned to dimmitude and eventual islamification or death. It goes without saying that this ridiculous argument condones the Turkish occupation of Cyprus and the Khazar occupation of Palestine.

National Front members would doubtless argue that non-Europeans have no place in Europe - which is of course true. To then state that Europeans have a right to exclusive control of territories in Africa shows that the National Front has reverted to an imperialistic position which sees non-Whites as inferiors who, (as the article claims), need Whites to tell them how to live. This is pure lunacy. The idea that Black Africans are inferior to White Europeans is one which does not help to protect and advance the beleaguered European people. This dehumanising ideology is divisive and can only cause resistance amongst sections of the White population who have not experienced the full ravages of multi-culturalism at close quarters. Needless to say, within the Black communities, knowledge of such thinking is hardly helpful in finding a mutually beneficial solution to the disastrous multi-cultural society which is detrimental to every culture involved.

The ideology of supremacy comes from a false belief that Blacks must be stupid because Africa is rich with diamonds and gold, but prior to the arrival of Europeans, these commodities were left in the ground, with the people of Africa 'failing' to industrialise their continent. To those who take this position, I would like to ask just what exactly is so wonderful about the destruction of the land and the spiritual debasement of the people which comes as a result of industrialisation and the promotion of materialist individualism? Are we, the ordinary people of lands which have undergone the Industrial Revolution, happier, stronger, healthier or wealthier (a questionable goal in itself) as a result of having the land of our fathers' wrenched from us and given over to international corporations? Have we benefited one iota by being reduced to the position of wage-slaves who must work in soul-destroying tedium in order to have a subsistence existence? Is there anything positive about the urbanisation which comes with industrialisation? The Urbanisation which denies the family the living space to grow one's own food; the Urbanisation which destroys the family and turns individuals into mindless producer-consumers devoid of morality and any sense of community, culture, tradition, place in time and space; the Urbanisation which gives the natural autonomy of the person over to the anti-human State - are we to condemn the peoples of Africa for not rushing to embrace this poison which has led us to the point of absolute extinction as a culture and a people?

The article continues in its imperialist style by proclaiming that even though the White people in Africa are reluctant to find themselves living in nations ruled by Black Africans, they must be encouraged to live there and given financial support to do so. To this end, the writer envisages a situation in which Europeans will either be allowed to exploit the land of Africa with commodities flowing out of Africa to the new British Empire (!), or they will be settled on large reservations (yes reservations akin to those on which the Cherokees of North America live), which will be supported by the tax-payers of Britain and her neo-imperial realm. Forgive me if I find this all somewhat bizarre. Are we to seriously believe that Europeans are to be settled on African land, subsidised by Europeans in the home territories, with financial benefit going to the African leaders which the writer himself refers to as 'tin pot' regimes? This is the stuff of Alice in Wonderland, is it not?

One would hope that the failed and unsupportable policy of imperialism would have been confined to history. Sadly in the rantings of the National Front it is evident that this toxic ideology is alive and kicking. We are on the very brink of a complete collapse of Europe. If not halted now, the accession of Turkey to the European Union is only a matter of time. If this is allowed to happen, Europe will become an Islamic state and the centrepiece of the Khilafah. If Europe falls, it is a case of when, not if, the USA, Canada, Australasia, European South America etc fall. Yet we have the National Front campaigning on a dead issue which is unobtainable and morally reprehensible.

We need to face the grim reality of the situation in Europe. Certainly the European Union is a problem, but it is the political and bureaucratic system which needs dismantling - Britain cannot afford to turn her back on Europe, nor can any other European nation, whether it be Canada, Chile, New Zealand, Norway, Ireland, Russia or wherever. The petty nationalism and imperialism being displayed by the National Front is contrary to the best interests of all the people of Europe, including the British. The only solution to the onward march of internationalism and multi-cultural genocide is for Europeans to come together in solidarity.

With regards to the National Front policy on Europeans living in Africa, what they are proposing is the exact opposite of what needs to be done. The Europeans stranded in Africa must be given the opportunity to return to their ancestral homelands. Unlike the bogus Law of Return which the Khazars use to draw fellow Khazars into the territory of Palestine, a Law of Return for Europeans back to Europe is fully justifiable. Indeed having accepted that the multi-cultural system is harmful to all cultures, the only solution to the problem of incompatible peoples living in the same territory is for these peoples to be returned back to the lands of their origins. Europe belongs to Europeans, the Orient to Orientals, Arabia to Arabs, South Asia to South Asians, Africa to Africans, Palestine to Palestinians, The Caucasus to the Khazars. The situation in the Americas and Australasia is more complicated, but could (with very careful planning) provide a solution to the problem of those who have been created by miscegenation and have mixed identities.

In the European Regions formerly known as Great Britain, the political parties mobilised against internationalism are in disarray. The British National Party has embraced Zionism and the internationalist concept of nationality. People are leaving the BNP in disgust at the betrayal of the central tenet of the preservation of culture and ethnicity. They are being driven into the waiting arms of the imperialist, royalist, loyalist National Front. The National Front denies the right of autonomy to the constituent nations of the British Isles, demanding the Irish, Scots, Welsh, Picts, Manx, Cornish, Anglians, West-Saxons, East-Saxons, Mercians, Jutes, Britons, and the various Nordic peoples (to mention but some) submit the the rule of the 'British' state - the very same state which through no solid identity with the diverse peoples under its despotic rule, created the problem of international materialism in the first place!

The National Front is wrong with its support of Imperialism and control of African land; it is wrong in its support of the Zionist monsters in the Royal Family; it is wrong in its hatred of the Irish, who are fellow Europeans and fellow peoples of the British Isles; it is wrong in its refusal to accept the rights of the various peoples of the Isles to self-determination and cultural autonomy; it is an anachronism fighting battles from the past and failing to fight the battles of the present.

To any members of the BNP reading this who seek refuge in the National Front, I would advise you to think again - you will be leaving one (allegedly) anti-internationalist pressure group to join another. To members of the National Front, I ask that you seriously look at the direction your leaders are pulling you in. Political Parties are irrelevant - they are traps to contain and diffuse resistance against the internationalist agenda. The only way we can reverse the destruction of the European civilisation is by exposing those who are behind the drive to a single anti-human materialistic Global State. We need to think for ourselves and to act by our own initiatives. We don't need a Party Official to tell us how to do this, whilst he takes our money for subscription to an organisation that cannot, and will not change anything. Europe is dying and the NF is speaking of establishing colonies in Africa!

Stop relying on others to save you. Stop expecting someone else to lead you to a better life. Stop playing the Establishment's Party Game. The situation is dire but not unwinnable - We can stop the destruction of all we hold dear, but we must do it ourselves.