Beullogeo's

When I opened the email of which this was the main article, I could hardly believe what I was reading. The National Front was formed on the 7th February 1967 when the Racial Preservation Society, the British National Party and the League of Empire Loyalists merged. The above article would have fitted very easily into a publication of the League of Empire Loyalists, which praised the Empire and the occupation of alien lands to benefit the tyrannical Establishment of the Royal family and their Zionist Establishment, but to find it in the most recent publication of the modern National Front was surprising and alarming.

Chechar questions the non-anti-semitic limits on his White nationalism: A lightning in the middle of the night!

Lawrence "the majority should reassert itself" Auster supports the move, saying he understands Whites and jews have different, sometimes conflicting interests, and though he unequivocally favors jews he does not object to White political or cultural self-determination: An anti-anti-Semitic blogger announces that he is removing the first "anti".

Just kidding. Larry is such a serious anti-"anti-semite" he'd never say anything remotely like that.

UPDATE 26 Feb 2010: "Tanstaafl on Auster (I)"

While searching for the government immigration report mentioned in Cheerleading Genocidal Immigration I ran into a recent Australian government report.

Clear-eyed report spells out the risks | The Australian:

THE government's white paper on counter-terrorism is a landmark, a watershed, a signal moment: choose your metaphor.

What I mean to say is, it's a very important document, and for none of the reasons you have been hearing about in the past few days.

Sometimes the press gallery and the main media commentators so spectacularly miss the point that you wonder what universe they are living in.

For example, have you heard Hezbollah terror groups are operating in Australia? It's in the white paper, but not the media.

Have you heard the government has declared the level of terror threat a society faces depends on the size and composition of its Muslim minority? It's in the white paper but not the media.

The other criticism of the white paper is for using the term jihadist. If it really was Rudd who insisted on this he deserves high praise. It is crucial we tell the truth. The al-Qa'ida version of jihad, like that of the Muslim Brotherhood or of many Wahabi Muslims and of the strand of Shia represented by the Iranian government, is, terribly, a minority but longstanding tradition within Islam. To pretend otherwise is to intellectually disable ourselves.

The descriptive passages in the white paper are written in calm but straightforward language and have the virtue of telling the truth clearly and unapologetically.

One weakness, or contradiction, for the government is that the white paper rightly extols the need for tight border security, yet the government's policies have weakened border security to our north. Virtually any Middle East or South Asian Muslim who gets to Christmas Island now gets to stay in Australia permanently and ultimately gets access to family reunion. That's starting to be many thousands of people who have not been chosen under regular Australian procedures.

The scale of the problem will continue to depend on factors such as the size and make-up of local Muslim populations, including their ethnic and/or migrant origins, their geographical distribution and the success or otherwise of their integration into their host society.

Future geo-political events could mean other terrorist movements with a presence or support base in Australia could become willing to engage in operational activity here. And in the future new terrorist threats could manifest themselves in Australia, either as a by-product of events overseas or as a result of a political grievance within Australia. There will always be the disaffected and disempowered, often but not always at the fringes of communities or the followers of radical ideologies, who mistakenly see advantages in the use of terrorist tactics.

The aim of Australia’s counter-terrorism strategy is to protect Australia, its people and interests from terrorism.

Australia’s counter-terrorism efforts are intelligence-led and focused on prevention.

Australia’s counter-terrorism efforts are supported by our open democratic society. There are inherent strengths in our society that make Australia resilient to the divisive worldview of al-Qa’ida and like-minded groups. However, we know from experience that the terrorist narrative may resonate with a small number of Australians. It is incumbent upon all Australians to work together to reject ideologies that promote violence, no matter from where they arise or to what purpose they aspire. We must all support and protect the values and freedoms from which all Australians benefit. By reducing disadvantage, addressing real or perceived grievances and encouraging full participation in Australia’s social and economic life, government policies can help to mitigate any marginalisation and radicalisation that may otherwise occur within the Australian community.

To be effective, Australia must pursue a principled and proportionate response that promotes and upholds the values we seek to protect.

This chapter explains how Australia will counter violent extremism by:

* building on Australia’s history of inclusion, multiculturalism and respect for cultural diversity to maintain a society that is resilient to the hate-based and divisive narratives that fuel terrorism;

Australia’s inclusive, multicultural society is one of our strengths. Australia needs to harness this strength in the face of the divisive narrative of terrorist groups. We have a key interest in not allowing messages of hate to divide our community. Maintaining a resilient society based on shared freedoms, respect and understanding of our diversity helps us achieve that.

Australia is a country that recognises, accepts and respects cultural diversity. However, Australia will not tolerate the propagation of violent extremism and hate under the cloak of that diversity. The Government is committed to promoting respect, inclusion and a sense of belonging, in ways which address issues impeding social cohesion.

Exclusion or marginalisation of any individual or group of people can affect us all. It can affect a society’s cohesiveness, economic performance and, as we have seen overseas, the security and stability of the community as a whole. There are few countries in the world where migrants have achieved the level of economic, political, social and cultural participation that they have in Australia. But we cannot afford to be complacent. We know that a small number of Australians hold extreme beliefs and some of these individuals are or may be committed to supporting or engaging in acts of terrorism.

Illegal immigrant population in Georgia doubles, confirms changing migration trends - latimes.com:

In the years since [the Olympic Games came to Atlanta in 1996], the number of illegal immigrants living in Georgia has skyrocketed, more than doubling to 480,000 from January 2000 to January 2009, according to a new federal report. That gave Georgia the greatest percentage increase among the 10 states with the biggest illegal immigrant populations during those years.

"In a way it could be a sort of badge of success to have a higher undocumented immigrant population" because it means the economy is strong, [Demographer William] Frey [of the Brookings Institution] said.

"The only way you're going to get the illegal immigrant population in Georgia to go down is to legalize them or get rid of the jobs," said Dowell Myers, a specialist in demographic trends at the University of Southern California.

Consider the position of the American Indians at the present day. They live side by side with a people which always wishes to increase in numbers, to strengthen its power. They see thousands of ships passing up and down their waterways. They know that the strength of their masters is irresistable. They have no hope whatever of seeing their native land one day delivered from their conqueror; their whole continent is henceforth, as they all know, the inheritance of the European. A glance is enough to convince them of the tenacity of those foreign institutions under which human life ceases to depend, for its continuance, on the abundance of game or fish. From their purchases of brandy, guns, and blankets, they know that even their own coarse tastes would be more easily satisfied in the midst of such a society, which is always inviting them to come in, and which seeks, by bribes and flattery, to obtain their consent. It is always refused. They prefer to flee from one lonely spot to another; the bury themselves more and more in the heart of the country, abandoning all, even the bones of their fathers. They will die out, as they know well; but they are kept, by a mysterious feeling of horror, under the yoke of their unconquerable repulsion from the white race, and although they admire its strength and general superiority, their conscience and their whole nature, in a word, their blood, revolts from the mere thought of having anything in common with it.

Arther Gobineau, circa 1854, p121 of The Inequality of Human Races, copyright 2009 by General Books LLC.

ENVY

The concept of envy — the hatred of the superior — has dropped out of our moral vocabulary …

The idea that white Christian civilization is hated more for its virtues than its sins doesn’t occur to us, because it’s not a nice idea. …

Western man towers over the rest of the world in ways so large as to be almost inexpressible.

It’s Western exploration, science, and conquest that have revealed the world to itself.

Other races feel like subjects of Western power long after colonialism, imperialism, and slavery have disappeared.

The charge of racism puzzles whites who feel not hostility, but only baffled good will, because they don’t grasp what it really means: humiliation.

The white man presents an image of superiority even when he isn’t conscious of it. And, superiority excites envy.

Destroying white civilization is the inmost desire of the league of designated victims we call minorities. …

~ Joseph Sobran (Sobran’s — April 1997)

As many regular visitors here probably know, Lawrence Auster has been writing for years about an idea he calls "The First Law of Majority-Minority Relations in Liberal Society". The essence of it is that "liberalism" dictates that "minorities" who behave worst must be treated best by "the majority". It's a valuable insight, but I use sneer-quotes where Auster's terminology obscures reality. The law is more precisely stated in less euphemistic terms. Neo-liberalism dictates that non-Whites or non-Christians who behave worst must be treated best by White Christians. Jews behave the worst and must be treated the best.

This explains how news and opinion are reported by the media, how subjects are taught in academia, and how policy is formed by the government. Day in and day out they tell us that Whites are monsters and jews are saints.

When I first pointed out that Auster's law applies to jews he responded first by making an attempt, lame beyond belief, to explain why it shouldn't, can't, doesn't, and musn't. Then he shifted the argument to what a bad person I was, based in part on my pseudonym. No shit. He eventually settled, and remains settled to this day, on the logically unassailable position that only a "serious anti-semite" would think negatively of jews, therefore such thoughts should be ignored.

That summarizes the exchange until now. I refer those who want more detail to Auster and Anti-Anti-Semitism, which contains my initial challenge and his response. Criticizing Auster reviews the argument eight months later. Other comments regarding Auster are here.

What prompts me to write today is that a few days ago Chechar posted "Auster’s Law and Corollary". I left a comment there with the two links above and some short comments.

A few days later Auster linked Chechar in The more the Other threatens us , the more we accommodate ourselves to him, yet another pithy formulation of his law that fits jews. Auster no doubt thinks it is a safe statement to make. In his mind anyone who says they feel threatened by jews is declaring themselves a threat to jews, and this in no way represents any special accomodation whatsoever.

Don Marco Jawsario and Hesperado left comments on Chechar's post arguing against Auster's law applying to jews. It seems they are unaware of or don't care what has already been written, but I made some brief responses.

It's important to know where these commenters are coming from, as Auster is fond of saying. Don Marco Jawsario appears to be Auster's frequent correspondent Mark Jaws, AKA Marco Jawsario, who is jewish ("in the Army I was usually the only Jew in my regiment"). I have previously written about Hesperado in Hesperation. He has made it clear that he thinks "support for Judaism and the Jews is a non-negotiable virtue".

Auster obviously formulated his law with muslims and blacks in mind, not jews. He and his supporters want to exclude muslims and blacks (and "anti-semites") from "our" society, but not jews. They'd like to roust "the majority" to do the heavy lifting, and they point to just the portion of the anti-White system they want us to dismantle. It's a gambit. They know "the majority" might notice that a particular minority has long been dictating the terms for their own benefit. (After all, here I am saying it.) So for appearences they try to keep their version of the law jew-safe by adding subtle qualifications only indirectly exempting jews. "Oh, misbehavior doesn't include things like fraud, opening the borders, hate speech laws, bribery, organ trafficing - misbehavior means violence!" Of course when this doesn't fly it's right back to the same old story. Blame "anti-semitism". Jews are exempt and only jew-haters/conspiracy theorists/bad stupid evil subhumans think otherwise.

The question is, why should Whites heed this jew-serving double-talk? The law itself explains this aspect of "majority-minority relations" perfectly. In fact it fits better when they make their excuses and sling their insults than it would if they didn't. We can pretend the law doesn't apply to jews, and came from who knows where. Or we can say it does apply to jews, serves their interests, and has been promulgated by them for that very reason.

At the root of this double-talk is Auster's dissembling. "The majority" is White, and we are quickly being reduced to a minority, not by "liberalism" but by anti-White/pro-jew neo-liberalism. We can argue about whether "the majority" means White Christian, but Christian is an increasingly imperfect proxy for White. Non-White Christians don't get shit on by neo-liberalism. Non-Christian Whites do. Whites are distinct from "whites", which is Auster's term for an amalgam of Whites and jews inseparable except when jews see fit to distinguish themselves for special treatment. The regime is not anti-"white", it is anti-White. If what is being done to Whites were being done to jews, even as part of an anti-"white" regime, they would call it genocide, and people who tried to paint it as "suicide" would be accused of aiding and abetting that genocide. Auster may get warmer at times, but I don't believe he will ever come clean about these crucial distinctions. He's more concerned with the consequences for jews than anything else.

When Auster discusses Whites (euphemized as "the majority", or "white gentiles", or "white Christians") it is only to blame us. He does not blame jews. For example, in Black racial preferences at Annapolis; and a conversation with Paul Gottfried about white guilt,, Jews, and Protestants, Auster writes (my emphasis):

What distinguishes Jewish liberalism from Protestant liberalism is the following: Jewish liberals see white Christians as guilty. The Jews feel OK about themselves, they think the white gentile majority is the problem.

By contrast, white Protestant liberals feel guilty about themselves. This leaves them without a confident group selfhood. They believe only in equality, only in their own guilt for somehow standing in the way of equality. It is this lack of collective and even individual selfhood, this inner nothingness, this willingness to be destroyed, that makes the white Protestants the true liberals.

The Jews, whose collective and individual psyche is not guilty under liberalism (since in the liberal world view Jews are victims and the champions of victims), have psychological power and self-confidence and thus are not true liberals.

The above short film is of a march protesting against the planned accession of Turkey to the European Union. The march was organised in Greece by the Nationalist Movement, the Golden Dawn. Sent originally to Final Conflict, the Greek activist wrote the following:

"Hello comrades!

Last Saturday nationalist party of Greece GOLDEN DAWN organized a demo against turkey in Europe and against multiculti society! Comrades from Serbia, Russia, Italians of FORZA NUOVA, Germans of NPD and other European nationalists also also took part in this great moment for European nationalism.

UNITED WE'LL WIN!"

This is positive news indeed. For centuries, our enemies have exploited petty squabbles amongst indigenous Europeans in order to prevent us identifying the real enemy and dealing with it once and for all. Pitting European against European due to artificially manipulated differences has been a key strategy of the Globalists. At last these differences are being put aside as people are waking up to the fact that appreciating what we have in common as Europeans is paramount in our struggle for survival against the Global enemy. This applies to Europeans overseas in the Americas, Australasia, Soutn Africa, in fact anywhere our people are to be found.

Splitting people into rival factions within Christianity has led to the deaths of massive numbers of our people. Who has benefited from this fracturing of our common spiritual heritage? Certainly not those who have perished for adherence to, or rejection of, doctrinal minutiae. The only lasting effect has been to weaken peoples faith and to thus allow the Judaeo-Christian disease of materialism to take hold. Often this sickness hides behind atheism, but its roots are undeniably found in Talmudism. Regardless of whether one is a Christian (of any non-Judaeo variety), or a follower of Odinism, Druidism or other ethnically European Faiths, belief in something beyond the physical provides protection against the Internationalist 'religion' of Materialism. The march above has seen religious differences put aside - uniting the forces of Europe against the diabolical enemy at the gates.

Materialism is the fundamental enemy. It has been presented in many forms, notably the Class War of Communism and Capitalism, and the anti-Family ideology of Feminism, which rather than liberating women has enslaved them in the same shackles as endured by men. Regardless of the noble sounding demands for equality, brotherhood and freedom, those who espouse the Internationalist ideology, are unwittingly (in some instances) advancing the cause of Zionist despotism and universal serfdom for those outside the cabal of the Chosen.

The purpose of Internationalism is to reduce humanity to obedient consumer-producers. To this end, all cultural and ethnic differences have to be destroyed. Bringing Turkey into the European Union will reverse the victory of Europe over the Islamic invaders near Kosovo Polje in 1389. It will bring over 200 million non-Europeans into the European homeland. They will bring with them an alien religion and culture which is wholly incompatible with the spiritual and cultural identity of Europe. Further they will bring an entirely incompatible ethnicity which, (when one considers the decline in European births versus the ever-increasing breeding rate of the Turks), will see the genocide by miscegenation and out-breeding of the indigenous people of Europe.

To those who would call this alarmist, look at European territories which have already been occupied by the Turks. Cyprus is a relatively recent example - invaded by Turkey on the 20th July 1974, the island has suffered terribly. Some of the results of the Turkish presence in this European and include:

• at least 55 churches have been converted into mosques
• another 50 churches and monasteries have been converted into stables, stores, hostels, museums, or have been demolished
• the cemeteries of at least 25 villages have been desecrated and destroyed
• innumerable icons, religious artifacts and all kinds of archaeological treasures have been stolen and smuggled abroad
• illegal excavations and smuggling of antiquities is openly taking place all the time with the involvement of the occupying forces
• all Greek place names contrary to all historical and cultural reason were converted into Turkish ones.
• about 142.000 Greek Cypriots living in the north – nearly one quarter of the population of Cyprus – were forcibly expelled from the occupied northern part of the island where they constituted 80% of the population. These people are still deprived of the right to return to their homes and properties. A further 20.000 Greek Cypriots enslaved in the occupied area were gradually forced through intimidation and denial of their basic human rights to abandon their homes. Today there are fewer than 600 enslaved persons (Greek Cypriots and Maronites).
  

Turkey is wholly alien to Europe. The atrocities conducted by Turkish soldiers in the invasion of Cyprus, as recorded by the European Commission of Human Rights, include:

• Execution of eight civilians taken prisoner by Turkish soldiers in the area of Prastio, one day after the ceasefire on August 16, 1974.
• Killing by Turkish soldiers of five unarmed Greek Cypriot soldiers who had sought refuge in a house at Voni.
• Shooting of four women, one of whom survived by pretending she was dead.
• A mentally-retarded girl of 24 was raped in her house by 20 soldiers. When she started screaming they threw her from the second-floor window. She fractured her spine and was paralysed
• One day after their arrival at Voni, Turks took girls to a nearby house and raped them
• One woman from Voni was raped on three occasions by four persons each time. She became pregnant
• One girl, from Palekyhthrou, who was held with others in a house, was taken out at gunpoint and rape
• At Tanvu, Turkish soldiers tried to rape a 17-year-old schoolgirl. She resisted and was shot dead
• A woman from Gypsou told Dr H that 25 girls were kept by Turks at Marathouvouno as prostitutes. A fellow prisoner who was kicked in the mouth. He lost several teeth "and his lower jaw came off in pieces."
• A Turkish officer, a karate student, who exercised every day by hitting prisoners.
• Fellow prisoners who were hung by the feet over the hole of a lavatory for hours.
• A Turkish second lieutenant who used to prick all prisoners with a pin when they were taken into a yard.
  

Modern Turkey was founded by the Zionist Kemel Ata Turk, a homosexual and a marrano Jew. The Turkish nation has been run along Zionist lines since its creation. Its military has a great deal in common with the terrorist Israeli Defence Force, including the persecution of people in their own lands, under its occupation. Much is said of the horrific treatment of the people of occupied Kurdistan - the same cruelty is meted out to the Greeks of Cyprus.

Turkish Prime Minister, Recep Tayyip Erdogan, openly proclaimed the reality behind the liberal lie of multi-cultural tolerance in Islam when he stated:

“The mosques are our barracks, the domes our helmets, the minarets our bayonets and the faithful our soldiers…”

Anyone who doubts that Turkish accession to the European Union would be anything but catastrophic to the ancient European nations need only look at areas where the former invasions took hold - such as East Thrace, which was the seat of Constantinople and Byzantium, but is now an Islamic beech head in mainland Europe. Likewise the impoverished and backward nation of Albania, which was such a disgrace to the civilised world that its Communist regime was held at arms length by the European Eastern Bloc. Islamic occupied Bosnia, Herzegovina and Kosovo have clearly shown what Islamic dominance means for the people to whom the land belongs - the slaughter of Croats and Serbs, with the full blessing of the Zionist terrorist group, NATO, is still ongoing, regardless of the silence of the controlled Zionist media.

The unity of the march of Europeans against the proposed invasion of the Turks is a positive step, and must be the first of many campaigns to rid our lands of the hostile elements who seek to destroy Europe and Europeans worldwide. We must spread the truth of the real nature of Turkey, and the religion it carries. Turkish accession to the European Union means the genocidal end of Europe and the absolute victory of the culture destroyers of Zionism.

The Zionists have yet again overstepped the mark with their open proposal of incorporating the Asiatic nation of Turkey and the criminal nest of Israel into the European Soviet. This lunacy is such that only the willfully blind will fail to see the danger ahead. This is an opportunity to stand together regardless of language and nation, and free Europe from the parasites who dominate her - and by so doing, make Europe the starting place for the demise of internationalism and the restoration of freedom for all nations all over the world.

Send California inmates to Mexico, says Schwarzenegger - Yahoo! News, Jan 25:

"I think that we can do so much better in the prison system alone if we can go and take, inmates for instance, the 20,000 inmates that are illegal immigrants that are here and get them to Mexico," Schwarzenegger said.

"Think about it -- if California gives Mexico the money. Not 'Hey, you take care of them, these are your citizens'. No. Not at all.

"We pay them to build the prison down in Mexico. And then we have those undocumented immigrants down there in prison. It would half the costs to build the prison and run the prison. We could save a billion dollars right there that could go into higher education."

California has some of the most overcrowded prisons in the United States, with an estimated 170,000 inmates housed in facilities designed for 100,000 people, according to 2007 figures.