Beullogeo's

Catcher In The Rye author shaped the popular culture he came to shun - Times Online:

For a man who spent half his life as a recluse, J. D. Salinger left an extraordinary, indelible imprint on popular culture. His influence transcended his literary fame and shaped future directions in film, television, music, and theatre as well as popularising the term “to screw up”.

Salinger’s classic is frequently cited as proof that culture cannot be held responsible for acts perpetrated by the people who consume it.

Really? That's not at all what they say about The Turner Diaries or The Protocols of the Elders of Zion.

J. D. Salinger: Author of The Catcher in the Rye | Times Online Obituary:

J. D. Salinger shot to worldwide fame with his novel The Catcher in the Rye, which appeared in 1951. With its disenchanted adolescent anti-hero, perpetually at war with adulthood, especially as embodied in his own parents, it seemed to encapsulate the mood of an entire generation. Perhaps more remarkably it simultaneously exercised a considerable effect on that generation’s behaviour.

Its protagonist Holden Caulfield instantly became the symbol of teenage alienation in America and his influence spread rapidly across the Atlantic. Not merely, as is so often the case, for his own generation, but for those that followed, the character of Caulfield continued to stand for the seeming impossibility for the younger generation of communicating in any meaningful way not only with their parents but also with the friends and associates of those parents. When the Sixties opened, with teenage rebellion in Western society taking on a different hue and, under the influence of rock’n’roll, sexual emancipation and drugs, having apparently a different set of preoccupations, the gospel of Catcher in the Rye remained as potent as ever.

Jerome David Salinger was born in New York in 1919, the son of a kosher cheese salesman of Polish ancestry, and his wife, who was a convert to Judaism.

Here is an example why distrust of even partial jews is justified. Their racial confusion can express itself in highly destructive forms. Yet Salinger's refusal to bask in the media's adulation seems to confound and bemuse them, though they seem to know more than they let on about why. Perhaps what drove Salinger to become a recluse was shame and disgust at the negative impact of his novel, and perhaps that sprang from his non-jewish side.

Why did J D Salinger spend the last 60 years hiding in a shed writing love notes to teenage girls? | Mail Online:

Born in New York on January 1, 1919, J.D. (Jerome David) Salinger's early life gave little hint of what he would become, although there were several factors that affected him deeply.

One was the shock of believing he was Jewish and then discovering that he was only half-Jewish - his mother was, in fact, a Catholic.

More scarring still, however, were his experiences in World War II, in which he saw numerous comrades killed around him.

He landed on Utah Beach on D-Day and fought all the way to Paris. There, he met Ernest Hemingway who encouraged his writing.

Still in Europe when the war ended, he was sent to Germany to interrogate Nazis.

There, he fell in love with a girl called Sylvie - later believed to be a former Nazi official - whom he married and, after eight months, divorced.

He later described her as 'an evil woman who bewitched me'.

Salinger went back to his life of seclusion in the hidden cabin, around which he now owned 450 acres. Dressed in a blue boiler suit, he wrote every day, although not for publication - a possible treasure trove of up to ten novels are believed to lie in his locked safe.

I get the distinct impression these later writings would be hated by the same people who love Catcher. Ironically, in today's anything-goes, sexually-liberated environment smears of a sexual nature are a typical treatment for heretics. "Nothing to see here! Don't pay any attention to what this pervert has to say!" Tellingly, Salinger didn't hole up in Manhattan, Palm Beach, or the Hollywood hills where he could have much more freely slaked his supposed tastes sheltered alongside other celebrated perverts.

How alienating it is to witness the media today looking back and celebrating the impact of Salinger's novel, even as they ridicule the author and his own reaction. But then they celebrate everything destructive about the White/jewish "culture war". Caulfield's alienation makes sense to them, it's laudable even, while the alienation engendered by themselves they paint as malevolent "ignorance" and "hate".

It is for good reasons that Francis Parker Yockey described jews as Culture-distorters and the bearers of Culture-disease. In a culture free of jewish influence novels such as Catcher in the Rye would be disparaged, not celebrated.

I ran into an interesting statement in the February issue of Wired that neatly captures the essence of the plutocracy's current dilemma. The statement came from Peter Thiel - "billionaire", "staunch libertarian", and "VC philanthropist" - in Utopian Pessimist Calls on Radical Tech to Save Economy:

Wired: What happens if we don’t get the growth everyone expects?

Thiel: If it doesn’t happen, people will go bankrupt in retirement. There are systemic consequences, too. If we don’t have enough growth, we will see a powerful shift away from capitalism. There are good things and bad things about capitalism, but inequality becomes completely intolerable to society when everything’s static.

"The economy", such as it is today, is essentially a pyramid scheme. Its "health" hinges entirely on growth. More people, more consumption, more loans, more interest, and more profits, especially for those on top. The plutocrats fear that if the growth ever stops, or even pauses for any length of time, the jig is up.

Is Thiel, like so many other "philanthropist" plutocrats, jewish?

He's hated for supporting NumbersUSA and has written a book criticizing multiculturalism, two things rather untypical of jews.

With friends like these ... Tom Hodgkinson on the politics of the people behind Facebook, 14 January 2008:

But Thiel is more than just a clever and avaricious capitalist. He is a futurist philosopher and neocon activist. A philosophy graduate from Stanford, in 1998 he co-wrote a book called The Diversity Myth, which is a detailed attack on liberalism and the multiculturalist ideology that dominated Stanford. He claimed that the "multiculture" led to a lessening of individual freedoms. While a student at Stanford, Thiel founded a rightwing journal, still up and running, called The Stanford Review - motto: Fiat Lux ("Let there be light"). Thiel is a member of TheVanguard.Org, an internet-based neoconservative pressure group that was set up to attack MoveOn.org, a liberal pressure group that works on the web. Thiel calls himself "way libertarian".

Thiel says that PayPal was motivated by this belief: that you can find value not in real manufactured objects, but in the relations between human beings. PayPal was a way of moving money around the world with no restriction. Bloomberg Markets puts it like this: "For Thiel, PayPal was all about freedom: it would enable people to skirt currency controls and move money around the globe."

Thiel is #377 on the 2009 Forbes 400, but he isn't counted as jewish ("either personally or in their giving") by Jacob Berkman in Jewish Philanthropy Navigates The Economy’s Rough Seas.

The authors of Jews On The Internet and The Jewish hand behind Internet come from polar opposite views on jewish influence, but they both agree Thiel is a jew.

George Soros, another plutocrat who definitely is a jew, was quoted in the news today offering his underling in the White House some public advice.

Davos Soros: Obama reform plan not tough enough - Times Online:

Mr Soros told delegates: "To tax the banks when they are doing everything they can to get out of a hole is the exact opposite of the policy you are trying to pursue...This development came too soon because the banks are not out of the woods.”

Mr Soros also said governments around the world needed to continue spending, even if they had sizeable budget deficits, to avoid the risk of a double dip recession.

What Soros is saying is: tax and indebt the masses, not the plutocrats.

Other bankers expressed concern over "stifling growth".

As Hunter Wallace put it:

Democracy: the theory that you have as much power and influence as George Soros.

You could say the same about any plutocrat. But the power and influence of Thiel, Soros, David Gelbaum, and other jewish plutocrats is compounded by its tribally-networked nature. What comes through clearly in the Berkman article is the "supremacism" with which jews view their collective power, and the unapologetically "racist" way in which they direct so much of their "philanthropy" to fellow jews. What should make this situation troubling for any White, rich or poor, is that jews do it under the aegis of a regime which favors and defends jews and jewish interests even as it directs fear and hatred toward Whites.

Where are the mainstream media's fierce critics, the speakers of truth to power? Like the figureheads in our illegitimate government they'll bash powerless White "teabaggers" with glee, but they're afraid to question their jewish overlords.

Hunter Wallace, whose blog Occidental Dissent I regularly visit and comment at, recently created a new blog called Antisemitica whose byline is "Reasoned Analysis of the Jewish Question". Visitors who sympathize with the topics and attitudes discussed at this blog can find a much greater and steadier source at either of these blogs.

At Antisemitica Hunter has been especially successful at eliciting responses from prominent opinion-shaping jews. I enjoyed the recent critique of James Howard Kunstler, who I recently wrote about in Who Thinks Thinking is Unthinkable and Why. Hunter wrote Kunstler and Whites, then he answered Kunstler's dismissive response in Kunstler on Antisemitica. I left comments on both posts.

Beyond this, HW's new blog regularly provides brilliant insights into exactly the kind of White/jew faultlines that have drawn my attention for the past two years. HW offers pro-White views and explanations that have been excluded from mainstream discourse even as unapologetically pro-jew views and explanations have become more common. I'll excerpt and comment on a few points I found of particular interest.

The Jews and Obamacare:

In a racially homogeneous country, an Iceland or Finland, I think such a system could work. In America, it will become just another mechanism for wealth redistribution from Whites to non-Whites. The “47 million uninsured” are disproportionately blacks and Hispanics. I don’t want to see scarce resources drained away from the White community and wasted on people who nurse racial and ethnic grievances against us. I oppose the bill for that reason.

With that in mind, I wasn’t surprised at all to learn this morning that “Jewish groups have been at the forefront of lobbying the U.S. Senate and House of Representatives for health care reform, framing their support within the Talmudic mandate of Tikkun Olam, repairing the world.” In other words, Jews as Jews are lobbying the government for wealth redistribution from Whites to non-Whites. The Jewish community is the vanguard of the interests pushing for this destructive piece of legislation.

I haven’t heard a peep of this from conservatives, libertarians, or race realists.

The only peep I think we're likely to hear is the unthinking accusation that the whole problem is unthinking "jew-hate".

Why Jews Hate Palin:

Ultimately, Jews hate Sarah Palin for the same reason White conservatives adore her. They hate her for the same reason John McCain picked her as his running mate. She is the goddess of implicit Whiteness. Palin appeals to the demographic that American Jews have alway considered their traditional enemy: rural and suburban White Christians from the Southern and Western states.

She is one of them. If Palin was ever elected president, she could unite this demographic and represent their small town values at the highest level of the American government. Jews would feel threatened by “hope and change” of this sort. Dire warnings about the “new anti-Semitism” would be issued by Jewish organizations. Emigration to Israel would be contemplated. Jews would feel even more alienated from America than they already do now.

Fear and loathing of White Americans, “leukophobia” or “anti-Whitism,” is normal, acceptable, and mainstream in the Jewish community. It is a form of racial prejudice like any other. It is also a driving force behind Jewish support for Barack Obama. What better way to drive a stake through the heart of White America than to elect a mulatto as President of the United States?

I noted this jewish fear and loathing in The Election is Over, written directly in the wake of the 2008 election. Only now, more than a year later, are famously hyper-sensitive, hyper-critical, and hyper-opinionated jews frankly discussing the issue. Of course a major portion of that discussion consists of denial that the issue is real, or that it's worth discussing.

Swastikas and Hate Crimes:

Trivial property crimes against Jews routinely get national press coverage. Violent crimes against Whites are buried in local newspapers. This is one the small daily reminders of Jewish privilege.

In the comments to If Hasan Were White I noted how while everyone in the media and government was telling everyone not to jump to conclusions about Hasan's motives a shooting near an LA synagogue inspired an instant and publically announced assumption that the cause was "anti-semitism". Nobody in media or government criticizes jews for words or actions that go beyond what is pathologized as "hate" or "racism" in Whites. To even call attention to these White/jew double standards is considered "anti-semitism".

Israel and Jewish Privilege:

Jewish privilege is real. White privilege is non-existent. Just recently, Switzerland was widely condemned around the world for its ban on the construction of minarets. The rejection of this bill in Israel [that would force the Israeli Lands Administration to allocate land equally between Arabs and Jews] (and dozens like it over the years) hasn’t set off a similar backlash in the United States. It is understood that Israel has a right to remain a Jewish state whereas the right of Switzerland to remain a White Christian nation is highly controversial.

White/jew double standards are palpable. See my related posts Whose Country Is This Anyway? and Switzerland Minus Minarets.

Neocons are Anti-Semites:

This is a great example of what Kevin MacDonald calls Jewish self deception. The charge happens to be true. Jews look at Sarah Palin and they see the most white bread conservative leader since Pat Buchanan. They see the implicit whiteness in the metastasizing Tea Party crowds.

Their cultural antennae has a visceral negative emotional reaction. It goes far beyond public policy disagreements. Their gut instinct tells them crowds of angry White people are “bad for the Jews.”

When White Americans respond to negro and Hispanic chauvinists in this way, Jews decry it as “racism.” In a sense, they are right. It is racial prejudice at work; an emotional short cut that bypasses reason.

I think this view of the Tea Party phenomena is correct. There's much, much more to be said about it. It strikes me as similar not only to the prismatic polarization Palin has provided, but Polanski as well. The pattern is this: White/jewish visceral disgust, followed by jewish/White instinctual reaction to that disgust, followed by largely jewish opinion-shaping aimed at obscuring the White/jew divide, often mixed with one-way blame on supposedly irrational "jew-hate" emanating from Whites.

I've read brief allusions to this supposed jewish self-deception, but I haven't read MacDonald's original argument. Can someone point out in which book it is made? Perhaps I misunderstand the idea.

Ironically, the idea that jews don't know what they're doing or why seems to me an unconscious attempt to downplay the significance of the obvious stereotypical jewish lack of scruples and utter contempt for the notion that lying or hypocrisy is something to be avoided or to be ashamed of, at least when it comes to serving their own personal or wider jewish interests. I see true self-deception in Whites, especially those who won't judge jews, or judge them by softer standards than jews themselves see fit to judge non-jews by. We don't have to make excuses for the harm jews cause us any more than jews feel the need to excuse what they deem to be harm caused by Whites. You never see them excusing "racists", "haters", "tea baggers", "rethuglicans", "neo-nazis" - which are all codewords for Whites - as self-deceivers. In jewish eyes any White who acts White is simply a threat. The enemy. For example, when accused of being anti-White Kunstler answered:

I'm not against white people... I'm just against white people who are against other people....

It's one of the same responses I got from the anti-White "reality-based community". Only those who see Whites as some kind of lesser beings have a problem with us saying "I'm not against non-White people... I'm just against non-White people who harm White people..." Jews don't like that, and it's not because they're unaware or lie to themselves about their own outrageous, self-serving hypocrisy. They don't like it because they are hyper-aware of their own group's interests and don't give a shit what anybody else thinks about that. It reflects a fundamental difference in mental function, not some innocent oversight.

On Antisemitica's Kunstler thread I responded similarly to "David F" (David Frum?), who seemed eager to explain away Kunstler's behavior as unconscious. "David F" dissembled, claiming Kunstler is "just writing about the underclass the way everyone in his social circles does", without noting that it's very visible, very outspoken jews like Kunstler, Frum, Horowitz, Brooks, etc. shaping and pruning and leading the way - pathologizing and excommunicating Whites who question the pro-jew/anti-White social circle norms.

Another illustration of what I'm getting at is faux-White jew Lawrence Auster, who strikes an explicitly pro-"white" pose and urges "the majority" to reassert our interests. Simultaneously he considers Whites who criticize jews to be worse than an evil enemy. To him we're subhuman. He's not lying to himself, he's lying to everyone else. Auster is an extremely self- and group-aware pro-jewish chauvanist who simply lacks the honesty to plainly state his priorities, which are clear from his frequent and energetic attacks on "the anti-semites". He absurdly maintains that the recognition of this fact itself represents irrational "jew-hate". This has been pointed out to him and he has read the critiques, repeatedly, and he continues to maintain his position (see for example, Is Majority Rights cleaning up its act?, Anti-Semitism and the Jews--a collection, What the anti-Semites believe, An apostate anti-Semite, and The Darwinian anti-Semites' self-contradiction). To paraphrase his co-tribalist Kunstler, Auster isn't against "white" people... He's just against White people who resent jewish interests being misrepresented as identical to "white" interests. Both men have stated their positions clearly and openly in response to being challenged.

Paul Gottfried on Neocons:

Gottfried bluntly says that Jews control the American Right. From their throne in Manhattan, Jewish neocons enjoy the privilege of being able to manipulate the status system (using their own ethnic interests as a litmus test) to determine who is “mainstream” and “respectable” and thus who can be granted entry into the national political conversation.

In the end, Gottfried sounds more like an apologist than a truth teller.

Gottfried is yet another faux-White, pale-conning jewish critic of "liberal" jews. In the end he blames Whites and his strongest vitriol is reserved "the anti-semites". Neither he nor his friend Auster actually hold jews responsible for anything. In their minds the fault for all White/jew conflict lies entirely with Whites, whom they blame under cover of euphemisisms such as "the majority", "WASPs", "gentile whites", etc. much like Kunstler blames "yeast people" and "cornpone nazis". Pro-Whites can use whatever euphemisms or qualifiers we want in expressing negative opinions about jews, however precise, and for all their hair-splitting these brainy critics will unanimously identify and denounce that as "anti-semitism". The exception is when the criticism comes from themselves, because that's motivated by what they believe are the best interests of jews.

The Jews and NBC:

In the Jewish Journal, a recent article explicitly discusses Jewish control of NBC. White Nationalists have claimed for years that “Jews control the media” and use it to brainwash the White masses in anti-racist mores.

An excellent example of how jewish media influence allows jews to have their cake and eat it too, discussing the jewish power brokers behind the scenes at NBC amongst themselves while the mainstream discussion focuses almost exclusively on the roles and personalities of the pampered hired help who work out front. Jewish media influence is usually painted, both by jews and those currying favor with jews, as a ridiculous "canard" motivated by "jew-hate". One typical and true canard they respond with is that "[insert non-jew here] isn't jewish!" Another is that jews argue all the time. Of course as the Jewish Journal admits in its reportage intended for fellow jews, at NBC it's a "whole bunch of jews" doing the arguing. And of course it's jewish influence that keeps such frank discussions of jewish influence from being printed on the front page of the New York Times and Wall Street Journal.

January saw the Zionist mafia publicly displaying their influence over the Occidental World. In a typical display of oecumenical subservience, the Pope made his third visit to a Synagogue - this time to the Synagogue in Rome. Completely reversing the teachings of Christ that only those who accept Him as God may enter Heaven, the Pope pushed the lie of the Jews being a Chosen people, and stated that their religion was of equal validity to Christianity. This was nothing less than the preaching of anti-Christian dogma. The Pope's shameful grovelling to the enemies of Christianity may have been applauded by woolly-minded liberals, but was met by the Jewish community with the contempt it deserved.


Using the Pope's visit to Rome Synagogue as an excuse to attack the Church, Israel's Deputy Prime Minister, Silvan Shalom, demanded that the Church "open the archives in the Vatican in order to give some details of the Papacy of Pius XII in order to ease tensions between the Jewish people and Catholics." Holocaustianity preaches that Pope Pius XII was instrumental in the destruction of European Jewry during the Shoah. Even if there was any truth in the Holyhoax fable, the Catholic Church under Pope Pius XII aided the emigration of Jews from Europe. The statement that the wartime Pope should have spoken out against an event which didn't even happen, highlights the lunacy of the Holocaustian mentality - and to do so at the very moment that the present Pope was trying to appease those who stand in diametrical opposition to all the Church holds dear (family, morality, honest usury-free labour) is the profoundest chutzpah. That Pope Benedict affords such people any respect whatsoever is indicative of the spiritual malaise afflicting Christianity in the Zionist era.

A mere ten days after the spectacle in Rome which disgraced Christianity, came the International Day of Zionist Ascendancy (Holocaust Memorial Day). This year, the criminals behind the lie of the Holocaust, flaunted their power by (openly) taking over the German Parliament. Terrorist and Titular Gangboss of the 'turf' known as Israel, Shimon Peres, droned on about how the evil Germans had set out to exterminate European Jewry, and how the evil Arabs were still trying to do so, but that now the biggest threat was Iran, which sought to wipe Israel from the map (ignoring the irony that the brutal regime exists only because the beautiful and civilised nation of Palestine HAS been wiped from the map by the real Zionist genocide of the Palestinian nation.) In typical blasphemous fashion, the Zionist butcher Peres recited the Kaddish which prays for the coming of the Messiah - denying that He has already been in the incarnation of the Christ, Jesus. This highlights the folly of the Pope grovelling to the anti-Christs in Rome earlier in the month and the idea that there can ever be such a thing as Judaeo-Christianity.

Referring to the 6 million people who were not gassed, electrocuted, turned into soap, or otherwise maltreated before being reincarnated in the Zionist lands of Canada, the USA, the UK, Israel, and many other troubled lands, Peres stated that

"My Friends, the leaders of the German people and its representatives, in the State of Israel, and across the world, survivors of the Holocaust are gradually departing from the world of the living. Their numbers are daily diminishing. And at the same time, men and women, who took part in the most odious activity on earth – that of genocide – still live on German and European soil, and in other parts of the world. My request of you is: Please do everything to bring them to justice."

He failed to mention that Zionist in Great Britain are campaigning to have Israeli Terrorists in the Knesset exempted from prosecution under International Legislation against War Criminals, in order that they may enter Britain in safety. In an unbelievable display of disregard for the criminal actions committed by those under his command, Peres remarked that

"(Holocaust Memorial Day) constitutes the lesson learnt from the world's inattention in the face of the rising flames, and the killing machine that operated day after day, year after year, with no opposition"

This, from a man who has MOSSAD-controlled organisations such as the Anti Defamation League, prosecute as 'anti-Semites' anyone who criticises the Israeli slaughter of civilians in and around Palestine due to race and religion, which has been ongoing since before the alleged Holocaust which he demands all gentiles must honour in perpetuity! Later in his speech he laughingly states

"Since the day when the Jewish nation was founded, we have been commanded: "Thou shall not kill!" "Thou shall love thy neighbor as thyself!" "Seek peace and pursue it!" – in every situation, in every place."

Tell that to the people who have lost loved ones in Palestine, Lebanon, Iraq, Serbia, the World Trade Centre massacre, Suez, Hungary, Romania, Rhodesia, Afghanistan, Haiti, Northern Ireland, Bali, and the many, many other places afflicted by Zionist-manipulated terror and whole scale murder. The casualties make the alleged 6 million figure paltry in comparison - and these victims are real, not imaginary. To add calumny upon calumny, Peres stated that

"And if we constituted, we the Jews, a terrible threat in the eyes of Hitler's regime, this was not a military threat, but rather a moral threat." (Au Weh!)

With direct reference to the fact that the Federal Republic of Germany is wholly controlled by the Zionist cabal, Peres gloated:

"You, President Horst Köhler, you declared at the Knesset in Jerusalem that "the responsibility for the Holocaust is part of the German identity." We very much appreciate this. And you, Madam Chancellor, Angela Merkel, you have conquered the hearts of our nation with your sincerity and your warmth. You said to the American Senate and House of Representatives that "an attack on Israel will equate an attack on Germany." We shall not forget this" (We shall not forget this treason either Herr Köhler, Frau Merkel.)

For the full speech, including chilling demands for war against Iran which will destabilise the entire region and could be a catalyst for a conflagration of apocalyptic proportions, visit:

http://www.thejc.com/news/world-news/26488/peres-speech-german-parliament-in-full

International Day of Zionist Self-worship was not confined to the political realm. School children across the world were treated to sob stories designed to emotionally harm them and make them hate themselves and their people. An example of this comes from England, where the leading religious figure, Chief Rabbi Lord Jonathon Sacks took the opportunity to tell brainwashed self-hating goyim that:

"We encounter the worst evil in the history of mankind together with the greatest courage in the history of humanity. This is not an easy encounter but it gives us hope and direction for our future. May God avenge the victims.”

How many of the sobbing dupes know that according to Rabbinical tradition, the Jews ARE God? How many have investigated the Nazi regime and found that rather than being anti-Jewish, it was a Zionist Front, without which Israel would not exist? How many have come across the extraordinary comment of Izaak Greenbaum that 'One Cow in Palestine is worth more than all the Jews in Poland'? Or that as head of Jewish Agency Rescue Committee, this monster told the Zionist Executive Council on the 18th February 19 that:

"If I am asked, "Could you give from the UJA moneys to rescue Jews, 'I say, NO! and I say again NO!"

At its most fundamental, the Jewish experience in Nazi Germany can be summed up thus: The leadership of the NSDAP and the Armed Forces was compromised by Zionists (mostly part or full Khazars); the financial base of the NSDAP (without which war would have been impossible) was almost wholly built by Zionist Khazars (and non-Khazar collaborators); of the people who were rounded up, the Khazars (Ashkenazim) 'mysteriously' survived and went on to establish Israel and make up the backbone of the Globalist cabal; the Sephardim (the real Jews who comprised a minority of those who suffered under the regime) continue to be persecuted and murdered in the Khazar State known as Israel. The liars of Holocaustianity consistently fail to mention that the victims of the totalitarian states in Eurasia were the indigenous peoples, and those who ordered the crimes (such as the war) were the very Khazars who, to this day, are stealing from the emotionally-blackmailed taxpayers, the world over.

Following on from the hysterical drivel about persecution by others (whereas, infact the Khazars who complain of persecution can be seen to be the chief persecutors), the following worrying developments have come in quick succession, highlighting just how strong the Zionists feel...

• The puppet Zionist Reichstag have presented a common front with Israel against Iran (see: http://www.thejc.com/news/world-news/26628/analysis-germany-gets-tough-iran)
  
• The Italian Zionist regime has called for Israel to join the European Union (see
  http://www.thejc.com/news/israel-news/26695/berlusconi-my-dream-israel-join-eu )
  
  
• Bloggers who criticise the Zionist criminal network are being treated as dangerous enemies of society (see
  http://www.thejc.com/news/uk-news/26540/blogger-questioned-anti-zionist-harassment )

And its only February!

We are living in nightmare times, with the vast majority of the population sleep-walking their way to servitude and a certain death of self. This blog serves to provide the reader with the truth about what is really going on in this world. However, information provision is in itself not enough. I want the reader to become enraged at the lies he or she is being told. There is enough to be angry about.

We are told that we live in a democratic era in which the ordinary people have power over their own destinies. Insofar as people who are awake to reality can alter the way they are affected by events, this is true. However, the notion of 'democracy' goes against the notion of freedom. How so? The democracy experienced in the majority of nations is little more than the dictatorship of the corporations, with the acquiescence of a dumbed down mob. When your every word and action is monitored, with serious negative implications for those who do not obey the diktat of the Establishment, where then is the democracy? There is none.

This beloved democracy is reminiscent of Orwell's Big Brother, who controls every aspect of our lives and is greeted not be hatred but by the love of a child for its father. Big Brother is really the wicked step-mother of faery tales, who provides just enough to keep the child alive, but unbeknownst to the child, is stealing its heritage. Here in Great Britain we have the bizarre spectacle of the Party of Government establishing a charity (Common Purpose) which is then used to push political correctness and other aspects of communism onto public sector workers. This is obscene. Worse still, this state propaganda machine is funded by the tax-payer. We are literally paying for our own destruction.

Up until 2001, the USA was regarded as a land of opportunity, which offered a lifestyle of unlimited options for those willing to work hard and aim for the American Dream. Certainly this ideal was not shared by everyone, with many Europeans looking at America as the land of greed and debased culture, but there was a grudging respect for a nation which guaranteed its citizens the freedom to speak, write, and express themselves in any manner they saw fit. Since the MOSSAD/MI5/CIA atrocity in New York on 11th September 2001, the USA has become a nation in fear of the terrorist bogeyman, who really isn't some turban-wearing extremist from the Middle East, but is a Yarmulke-wearing extremist in the Government. People in the USA should be livid that there way of life has been trampled upon by enemies in the Establishment who seek global power and hate the freedoms the USA was once so cherished for. The average American has no desire whatsoever for the wars in the Middle East to expand the Rothschild State which languishes in occupied Palestine, heavily subsidised by Europeans in the USA and EU. Americans would be horrified to know their nation is hated worldwide as seen as a despotic military state. I hope to help inform the people in the USA of this, and generate the anger necessary to awaken them from the media slumber which is keeping them in check.

As I have said above, the illegal Rothschild base which calls itself Israel, is heavily subsidised by European nations worldwide. Why? Because, official historians tell us, the Jews were murdered en masse by Europeans between 1942 and 1945, and Europeans forever owe the Jews for what they did. Well, this is a monstrous lie. The leadership of the Nazi regime in Germany were Khazars, and far from exterminating million Jews, they created a war, with support from their Khazar brethren in charge of the British Empire and the USA (which in reality NEVER gained freedom from the British Monarchy). This war destroyed Europe and paved the way for the creation of Israel, and the Zionist control of much of the world. Certainly real Jews suffered during the war, but the Khazar impostors flourished. The real victims were the indigenous Europeans who were murdered in the tens of millions, of which very little mention is made in the Zionist media. For more on this see the excellent article on the part Khazar, and British spy, Hitler, at:

http://endwhiteguilt.blogspot.com/2010/01/adolf-hitler-founder-of-israel-by.html

Does it make you angry that you have been told you must be forever ashamed for the actions of your ancestors, when in fact your ancestors were the victims, and the perpetrators are stealing from you in the form of taxes extracted by their collaborators in the Establishment? It should.

In this blog I have also examined the lies of the Medical Establishment. They have told you that HIV causes AIDS and is incurable - actually AIDS is caused by a degenerate lifestyle of drug abuse and promiscuity, and can be reversed by adopting a healthy lifestyle and a good balanced, vegetable rich diet. They don't tell you this as they want people to die. Likewise we have seen the Bird Flu, Sars, and H1N1 Swine Flu farces, in which people have been scared into taking dangerous medication for no reason other than to increase the profits of the pharmaceutical industry. When confronted with evidence that the National Health Service in the UK, is in truth a National Homicide Service, staffed by people who are incompetent and serve only to push dangerous prescription drugs onto a terrified public, does that not shake your faith in modern Western Medicine? Does that make you want to research for yourself and uncover real therapies which cure rather than mask symptoms? Does it not make you angry that your taxes are being used to push onto you medicines which could kill you?

I could list the topics covered here - the anti-human Monarchy, the lies of religion, war for profit, education which keeps knowledge hidden from those outside the elite, globalisation, the Carbon Tax to fund the Global Superstate - even though Global Warming has been proven to be a lie (see: http://snardfarker.ning.com/profiles/blogs/climate-gate-videos-from-the ). We are being lied to on an outrageous scale. Doesn't this make you seethe with rage? I hope it does!

Why do I wish to create a state of anger in the readers of this blog? Why? Because I want people to go beyond gathering information, and start spreading it. It is not enough to uncover the truth of all which is wrong, if we do not use that information to expose those who seek our ruination, and to reverse the damage they have already done.

If the reader is sufficiently enraged to turn off the computer, and go out into the real world and spread the forbidden knowledge of the machinations of our enemies, then I have done my job. We must be realistic and sensible. We do live in a Police State, albeit one which hides behind an array of distractions so to convince the individual he or she is free. There is absolutely no point in indulging oneself in fantasies of armed insurrection - there have been no large scale revolutionary or terrorist groups which were not created by, or at least controlled by, the State. The IRA, UVF etc are simply branches of the British Security Services. Anyone who gives any serious thought to violence as a means of overthrowing the Establishment by so doing exhibits a complete lack of understanding of the enemy. We must fight - but peacefully, and unless absolutely unavoidable, within the law.

Our task is to awaken the people and show them that the enemy we are up against is a paper tiger. We have been subjugated because we have allowed ourselves to be. We must learn the value of saying NO to the authorities and refusing to cooperate with our oppressors. Our primary task is to educate our people.

Communication is the key to victory. Whether it is talking to people in a queue in a shop about the absurdities being passed off as news, or it is leafleting where we live with information which is pertinent to our neighbourhood, or maybe some imaginative and spectacular propaganda exercise which fuels the imaginations of the people, there are so many ways of reaching others that lack of action is unacceptable. The Establishment will not go away. Things will not suddenly get better on their own. What we need is to build mass civil disobedience and refusal to kowtow to those in uniform and those in positions of authority. Their authority exists only because we allow it. The power they have is really our power - we must take it back.

I do not have all the answers. I would be grateful for suggestions for how we can get the truth out to the wider population. Information without action is pointless.

I have generally avoided discussing details of my personal life on this blog. I don't wish to change that, but there is something I feel obligated to divulge.

My wife's father was an ashkenazi jew. He died when she was young but was by all accounts a loving, intelligent, and productive man who was not involved in stereotypically jewish politics or activism. My wife was not raised as a jew, though she is of course genetically 1/2 ashkenazi, and thus our children are, on average, genetically 1/4 ashkenazi.

I have not previously written of this for several reasons.

When I first started blogging in 2005 it seemed no more relevant to what I was thinking and writing than any other detail of my personal life. At that time I had no explicit racial awareness. I knew little about jews and considered them "white". People who thought otherwise seemed insane to me.

In 2007, with a deepening understanding of globalization and immigration, and especially neo-conservative hypocrisy (Sailer's "invade the world, invite the world"), I began to violate PC in earnest. I became racially aware. I realized then that my wife and children's jewish heritage was relevant, though at that time I saw it only as a potential shield from smears of "anti-semitism". I did not use it then for the same reason I have never resorted to "some of my best friends are..." defenses. Such tactics are a distraction, ultimately a waste of time and energy.

Since 2007 I have come to appreciate the biological and psychological differences between Whites and jews, as well as the history of jewish aggression and malfeasance against Whites. What I had seen as a shield turned into an achilles heel. I cared less about offending jews and more about offending fellow Whites. My self-regard shifted from confidence to unease.

I love my family. What I want stands. I can't roll back time and make this revelation sooner, but I can at least be forthright about it from here on.

• homosexuality is against nature: In the natural order planned by God, the purpose of the carnal union is generation. Now, generation is the natural fruit of the carnal union of man and woman. Therefore the carnal union of two persons of the same sex goes against the natural order planned by God.
  
• homosexuality is against reason: Reason presupposes things as determined by nature, before disposing of other things according as it is fitting. Now, in matters of action, it is most grave and shameful to act against things as determined by nature. Therefore, since the homosexual transgresses that which has been determined by nature with regards to the use of sexual actions, it follows that he acts against reason.
  

Thoughts of some Doctors of the Church about homosexuality:

• St. Augustine: "Those foul offences that are against nature should be everywhere and at all times detested and punished, such as were those of the people of Sodom, which should all nations commit, they should all stand guilty of the same crime, by the law of God, which hath not so made men that they should so abuse one another. For even that very intercourse which should be between God and us is violated, when that same nature, of which He is the Author, is polluted by the perversity of lust". (Confessions; III.8)
  
• St. John Chrysostomus: "The worst of it is that such an abomination is committed boldly and that the monstrosity becomes the law. Nobody nowadays fears, nobody blushes. They boast and they laugh at these actions. The people who abstain appear stupid and they who condemn are regarded as fools. If they appear to be the weaker ones they are crushed with blows. If they are stronger, people laugh, people mock them and make many jokes about them. They have no redress in tribunals or in law." (...) "I have heard also many men who are surprised that up to the present a new shower of fire has not fallen on us and that the chastisement of Sodom has not fallen again on our town which is even more deserving of punishment since it did not learn from the evils of the Sodomites. Although after two thousand years this place accursed and overwhelmed which was Sodom cries to the whole world by its appearance more eloquently than any one voice could, not to dare to commit such heinous offences, our fellow citizens have committed these offences not with less effrontery but quite on the contrary they show themselves more daring and unashamed as if they were determined to do battle with God and that they wish to prove that they wish to add to their crimes, in proportion as the threats become more terrible. How is it that according as the crimes of Sodom renew themselves the chastisement of Sodom is not also renewed? Ah, the reason is that a more terrible fire waits them and that a chastisement is reserved for them which will have no end." (Against the opponents of Monastic Life, III.8)
  
  (1) De adult. conjug.; cap. Adulterii; cause 32; q 7; quoted by St. Thomas Aquinas: Summa Theologica; II II q 154, a 12.
  
  (2) St. Thomas Aquinas: De Malo; q xv, a 2, ad 6.
  
  (3) Pope Alexander VII: Decree from the Holy Office, Sept. 24, 1665 prop. No. 24. (Dzs. 2044).

From the above it is clear the homosexuality is the most heinous of sins, and that no-one who commits homosexual acts can be a Christian. From a theological perspective, homosexuality is the work of Satan, and all who engage in homosexuality are condemned to eternal damnation. This is not purely Catholic dogma - it applies to all who call themselves Christian.

One may ask why I have gone into such detail regarding homosexuals? Precisely because the vast majority of children who are victims of paedophilia committed by men who dare to call themselves Priests, are male. Paedophilia is unforgivable regardless of the sex of the victim of the perpetrator or that of the victim, but I place emphasis on homosexuality as the majority of cases are that of men raping, or otherwise abusing boys.

The condemnation of homosexuality is so severe that homosexuals should not be allowed into the Church, and certainly not into the Priesthood. I imagine that there must be a screening process which seeks to find people who are unsuitable to join the Priesthood. However good that process, some homosexuals obviously do get through, and the result is the tragedy of child abuse at the hands of these vile monsters who are not Christian, and have no place in the Church.

It is indeed a disgrace and a shame upon the Church of Rome that homosexuals have been allowed to remain in the Church. This is a problem relating to the confessional - once anyone seeks absolution, their sins are forgiven. Priests take a vow of celibacy which forbids them having any sexual relations. A Priest who breaks this vow but confesses can remain a Priest. Herein lies the problem. Paedophilia is such a disgusting crime against humanity that it is hard to imagine how anyone could commit such a vile act.

When one considers the vast size of the Church of Rome, the number of paedophiles is actually very small - media focus is placed because the crime is so horrendous, and because those who seek to destroy humanity know they must first destroy all organised religions. The Church is the guardian of the family, and the family is the bulwark against the atomisation of the New World Order. The Roman Catholic Church is under constant surveillance by her enemies precisely for this reason. It is my personal belief that the Church has erred by trying to cover up the offences committed by Priests. The Church would have been better served by excommunicating the perpetrators and sending out a clear message. Trying to cover up the actions of the tiny minority of people who have joined the Priesthood and used their positions for evil purposes, is a mistake.

Our enemies are ruthless in highlighting problems which damage the reputation of the Church - in the same way as they are silent about the numerous good works of the Church. We cannot hope to avoid scandal by trying to hide. The cover-ups have most certainly been to protect the reputation of the Church, but they have failed because the liberal-Zionist enemy is hell-bent on using every weapon at its disposal to discredit the last stronghold of Christianity. If Rome falls, then the Globalists will have removed a powerful obstacle to their culture-less, spiritually-debased, materialist empire. Everyone will be worse off for this - including non-Catholic Christians.

It is a fact that a great many non-believers and communists have attempted to gain control of the Church. It comes as no surprise that active homosexuals have attempted to infiltrate the Church. I have met many Priests, Bishops, Monks and Nuns, and not a single one of them has behaved in a manner which would disgrace the Church. The overwhelming majority of the officials of the Church are decent and devout men and women, who are sincere in their desire to spiritually elevate mankind. There are some paedophiles and homosexuals who have managed to evade detection and have gone on to harm innocents, but they are very few in number.that the Priesthood is only open to men of virtue and decency.

I reiterate my position that no homosexual is welcome in the Church. This is a theological position as Scripture decrees that sodomy is anti-Christian. Sodomites who wish to join the Church are akin to bacon eaters who seek to force religious Talmudists to eat pig flesh at Chanukah! If one's chosen lifestyle goes against the Church, then why attempt to join it?

Leaving aside theology, the issue of homosexuality in society at large is one which also requires attention. Homosexuality comes in a variety of forms. It is apparent that some people are biologically predisposed to be homosexual, and it is futile trying to change them. However the advent of mass propaganda in the media which makes homosexuality appear normal and 'cool' is a different thing entirely.

Soap operas, mainstream films, liberal sex education etc are being used to promote homosexuality and encourage pubescent children who are plagued by the confusion which comes with hormonal changes, to 'experiment' - these people are victims of the mind-manipulators and can be helped. I say helped as the 'Gay' lifestyle is far from gay in the real sense. Most homosexuals live a promiscuous and miserable life, which embitters them against heterosexual society. Indeed, the increase in promiscuity and the decline in marriage amongst mainstream society can be seen to be a heterosexual version of the 'Gay' way of life.

The self-focused hedonistic lifestyle (whether heterosexual or homosexual( is fully artificial and engineered by those who seek to undermine society by atomising individuals and destroying that which has made society strong for time immemorial - a healthy traditional family, with strong and well-defined male and female role models. Remove the bond between a husband and wife, and the child is more readily manipulated by the Establishment to be a faceless consumer without thought or feeling. Lifestyle 'gays' are the Establishment model for all of us. In this regard, non-biological homosexuality and its counterpart in promiscuous heterosexuality, is Zionism in action.

In general society we must accept that homosexuality is a reality. Many homosexuals are the product of miseducation, and media propaganda. It is possible that a large percentage of homosexuals are the product of environmental factors, such as the presence of oestrogen in the water supply, and other products which would not naturally be present in vast amounts. For these people there is hope - the education system and media could very easily be turned from anti-natural, to pro-natural, giving emphasis to the benefits of traditional family structures and healthy ways of living. With regards to the pollution of the water supply, over time that could be eradicated.

Most homosexuals are victims of a liberal mindset which encourages them into lifestyles which are ultimately unfulfilling and miserable. Freed from the chemical and mental poison which has corrupted them, they could enjoy a wholesome and happy life. There are stable homosexual couples who do live fulfilling lives, just as there are many heterosexuals who suffer under the heel of materialism.

My hope for homosexuals in general secular society is that those who are biologically homosexual will live their lives in peace with heterosexual society, and stop demanding preferential treatment, or such lunacies as .'marriage' and the right to adopt (which is harmful to children mentally and is really a form of child abuse). For those who are content and fulfilled in stable relationships, I wish them well. My concern is primarily with those who are victims of thought control which is destroying a sense of worth in society as a whole. The traditional family is the best foundation for children, and should be represented as such in schools and the media. The current politically correct indoctrination of our children into accepting that which they would normally reject is something which we must resist. We must also reject the reactionary knee-jerk response of 'queer-bashing'.

We also are witnessing the failure of the Swine Flu scare, with people refusing to accept the vaccination - in the face of a massive blackmailing propaganda campaign. Leaked information, such as the refusal of those at the top of the World Health Organisation to take the vaccine, has further undermined the credibility of the globalists.

On the war front, there is a growing trend amongst soldiers in the USA of refusal to fight in occupied Afghanistan and Iraq, for the benefit of international finance. Some truly heroic individuals who are currently serving in the military, are risking everything by marching shoulder to shoulder with their civilian counterparts to demand an end to war for profit, and the restoration of the true purpose of the armed forces - to protect the people from foreign AND domestic enemies.

The advent of the Obama presidency has removed any doubt that the Constitution of the USA can in any way protect the people. The new President was not born in the USA (which the Constitution demands) and when questioned about this, resorts to ridicule. Evidence that the Founding Fathers were all Freemasons (or collaborators of the same) is now readily available. When these points are linked to the fact that every President has been a relative of the British Monarchy, it becomes clear that the Revolutionary War of Independence was a farce, and that the British Monarchy never relinquished control of the USA. Maybe this realisation will spread across the Atlantic and give those indentured to the Crown in the USA and the UK the resolve to deal with these parasites once and for all.

Information is coming out thick and fast. The European Union has no democratic credibility. Materialism, whether Communist or Finance-Capitalist, has been exposed as anti-human and an obstacle to freedom. The reliance of the world on sweat shops in China for the production of almost anything is enraging those who are now shiftless due to the contrived collapse of their economies, not to mention offensive to anyone who cherishes liberty for all.

2010 is starting to look like a year of opportunity. The internationalist Zionist machine has overstretched itself and become so confident in its success that it has failed to stop the truth getting out. The inherent contradictions and lies of internationalism are now in the public arena for all to see. We need to get that information into the hands of the masses - and to encourage people to be aware that WE have the power to stop this madness, by simply saying No to the Establishment and not cooperating with our oppressors. Our people have faced calamity before, and have overcome it. Now we have the opportunity to deal with our enemies so that future generations don't have to.

Nadolig ilawen a blwydden newydd dda i gyd. Oddi wrth Rufus.