Beullogeo's

Political Parties which strive to gain power through partaking in the democratic process will only have success if they water down their policies and transform themselves into carbon copies of the Establishment Parties they purport to oppose. Make no mistake about this - the political system will change as a result of the removal of the power of the internationalist mafia who have embedded themselves in the ruling clique. To this end, parties are not worth applying an inordinate amount of energy to. However, they are not without use.

Readers who are members of a party/movement, or any organisation/association which aims to influence the public will know that meetings seldom achieve anything of worth. By and large, a meeting will comprise of a series of speakers passing on information to the membership, the passing round of the collection hat to raise funds for the organisation (etc), a paper/literature sale, maybe a raffle/dutch auction, and a rousing speech by a skilled orator to end the meeting on a positive and inspiring note. Then, there may or may not be a social aspect with some members staying after the meeting to talk to people who have become friends as a result of membership. The social aspect is the most valuable of the meeting as it builds bonds amongst those present. What is generally disappointing is that however good the speeches, and however valid the information which is shared, on far too many occasions, that information is either lost in a sea of alcohol at the following social (or even during the meeting), or is bottled up inside the members who guard it in much the same way as members of secret societies such as the illuminised levels of the Freemasons.

Are you an organiser, or a key activist in any structured political/social movement? Does the above paragraph ring true? How frustrating is it that for all the time and work, (not to mention material/financial outlay), which is expended, targets are repeatedly not met. Meetings which are attended (when they don't clash with more 'important' events such as football matches) descend into back-slapping self-congratulatory shindigs are in reality just circuses to entertain the membership, who leave the venue with a surreal belief that by attending the meeting they have made a difference, and have moved one step closer to a change in society. This is a tragedy - in such instances it would be better had the meeting not taken place at all. It shouldn't, and doesn't have to, be this way.

To focus upon political movements, it is unacceptable that members attend meetings and do not share the information which is given to them. Certainly this is not the case with every organisation, but it is for far too many of them. This problem can be overcome by the imposition of expectations which members must meet. For example, the purchase of literature should be mandatory for all members - to this end a new edition of the party paper should be available at each meeting and members should be required to purchase the paper in bulk. If a single copy is priced at 50 pence/cents, then fifteen copies of the paper should sell for 5 pounds/euros/dollars. This allows the member to keep a copy for him/herself and to sell the others to recoup the initial outlay, and either make a small profit or give away some copies for free. Should the member so desire, all copies could be given away - that is down to the individual. When one considers that the cost is equivalent to the price of a couple of beers, is it really an unreasonable requirement? Maybe there are members who cannot afford the expense - this is where comradeship comes into play - those who are financially unable to fund the cost should be subsidised by those who are able.

All aspects of a meeting should be educational and should also be an opportunity to form bonds of friendship and support. These bonds will prove invaluable as times get harder. Of utmost importance is that information other than internal organisational matters is dispersed to the public at large. It could be argued that it is unrealistic to expect members to pay for papers which are created by others. It is. Members should be encouraged to contribute to the paper by submitting articles which they feel should be in the public domain. Not everyone will wish to contribute in this manner, but the option should be available. This will inspire members to do their own research into issues which they are passionate about. Parties should be happy to tap the skills of their members - otherwise they are just as bad as the mainstream and as such are not worthy of joining. This will naturally lead to problems on occasion, but a seasoned organiser should be able to deal with whatever arises. A further benefit is that by opening the writing of the paper to the membership, a sense of community and value can be inculcated - and a wealth of material will be readily available.

To those in leadership positions who object to the idea of members being able to participate in their own parties, I would have to ask exactly how do the leaders see the members? If they see them as cattle to milk for funds, and to do the donkey work, then I would question the motives of such leaders. To the members who would argue that a requirement to purchase literature in bulk and distribute it, is asking too much, I would question their motives for joining a party at all. Their reluctance to make small contributions in order to free their nations and their own families from the tyranny of the internationalist speaks volumes. They are not sincere, and certainly not active in any meaningful sense - they are hobbyists. Our struggle is not a hobby, it is a battle for the very survival of our way of life, our culture, our freedom, from the ever growing centralisation and uniformity of the cultureless and spiritually moribund globalist machine.

To all members of political parties I submit that it is your right to contribute to your party, and it is your duty to ensure that you distribute information which your countrymen would benefit from receiving. The globalist cabal will not be beaten without a massive resistance by the people at large. It is going to take work to overcome our enemies. Whether you are in a party or not, you will have to share information about the nature of the beast we are fighting. If you are not prepared to speak to others and inform them of the dire situation we face, then you may as well turn on your TV and enjoy watching your world become the inhuman creation the Establishment wish to turn it into - and watch your children become degenerate and materialistic automatons. The choice is yours.