Beullogeo's

I do not normally respond to the accusations of ne'er do wells, axe-grinders and others who enjoy spreading dis-info and making pointless and unworthy accusations. However, since I have changed tactics and begun posting blog articles to a wide variety of fora and social networks, I have become the focus of an orchestrated attack. Rather than answer the accusations individually - which is a massive waste of valuable time and effort, I shall answer the accusations here, and link my response as applicable.

The attacks I have received come in two main strands. Firstly, insinuations about how I earn a living, and secondly outright accusations that I am an advocate of the dissolution of the Church of England, which, it is maintained, is a bad thing. Thirdly, I am accused of anti-Semitism. I will answer these accusations in turn.

Firstly, there is the accusation that what I do for a living impacts upon what I write. Well, obviously, it does. It seems to me that a lot of the people who complain that I do work, are themselves shiftless, and happy to be doley scroungers. These people get their information from the tabloids, and the mainstream media. Other than 'news' from Establishment sources, those who rail against me tend to be Party activists, who receive politically-biased stories from the parties to which they belong. They take the propaganda they absorb at face value and do not question its validity. If the Party says that all the ills of the world are caused by people who eat bread, these activists will take it upon themselves to attack bakeries - whilst munching on a sandwich no doubt. Parties exist to spread propaganda, and if that happens to contain a reasonable degree of truth, then that is a happy coincidence. By using sources which are forbidden by the Party hierarchy, I am seen as a part of the enemy. In truth, by refusing to access all sources, Party activists are denying themselves the ability to see beyond the contrived version of reality the Establishment and the party create for them. They are going into the battle blindfolded - and hate anyone who refuses to cover his or her eyes and dares to search for the truth.

There does seem to be a bizarre train of thought which maintains that people who work can't be trusted. People who undertake menial tasks are seen as a threat, and God forbid anyone tries to climb out of the trap of minimum wage slavery and secure a position where he or she can provide for his or her family! It needs to be understood that by working in jobs which are not run-of-the-mill, people gain access to information which unemployed layabouts and unskilled wage-slaves cannot. I am fortunate in that my job is very interesting, and it does allow me to examine the workings of the State. To a limited degree I am privy to information which the public at large is not - and I use this first hand knowledge against the Establishment itself. We're not going to change a thing by shouting against the system from the outside - we need to get to its very core to do that. I make no apology for working, and for working my way into the beast. Only with knowledge of what 'they' are really doing, can 'they' be stopped

If all those who opposed the system were to get inside it, then it could be dismantled overnight. Attacking it from a position of ignorance, where the only information you have is what they want you to have, is to play a part in their pantomime - and to actively participate in furthering their agenda. This is beyond pointless - it helps reinforce the Establishment. If we are to defeat this monster, we have to know what we are fighting, and how best to go about it. Withdrawing our support by refusing to participate in their games is a key step. The system exists because people prop it up. Removing that prop is an essential part of the struggle.

The most repugnant aspect of the work-related attack upon me is the insinuation that I work for the Security Services, as some sort of 'double agent' - this is sheer lunacy! I am an individual who is aware of what is going on in the world around me, and can see that the traditional methods of opposition are controlled by the very enemy they purport to oppose. Those who cling to the Party System feel threatened by those who have escaped it and can see it for the farce that it always has been and always will be. I have noticed that it is common practice to refer to people who do not fit into the ideological boxes which have been constructed to keep the opposition in line, as State assets, informers, infiltrators etc. certainly such people do exist, and a careful eye must be kept out for them. But attacking anyone who doesn't toe the Party-line is sheer idiocy. Working with people who ideologically (and even personally) hate one another makes sense if the end result is positive for the restoration of freedom. The Establishment has constructed a web to keep us at each others throats. We must stop this childish behaviour and form alliances issue by issue to dismantle our common enemy. Thinking and acting as an individual is dangerous to those who make a living from the Party system, and those cannot see the reality beyond it. It doesn't make one a State plant - the notion is ludicrous and shows a lack of imagination and a degree of paranoia in the accuser.


As to the second accusation - that I oppose the Church of England. in a single word - Yes! I have written in detail about how until the Judaic takeover of Britain facilitated by the Royals, England was the staunchest Catholic nation of them all. Those who defend Judaeo-protestantism are pawns for the Establishment, who are blinded by an irrational hatred which doesn't stand up to scrutiny. Catholicism in its pure form is the strongest defence against Talmudism that Christians have. Ironically, after that there is really only Islam. England would be better off if it converted to Islam than it is being a tool of Protestantism, aka, Pharaseeism. And, I make no apology for that statement either.

Of the religions of Christianity, Islam and (Talmudic) Judaism, the oldest is Christianity. When the Jews broke the covenant by killing Christ, they established a new religion. The Talmud is the Holy book of the Judaic religion and negates everything Christianity stands for. Christianity and Judaism are as different as black is to white. Islam is interesting insofar as it attempts to synthesise elements of pre-Talmudic Judaism with Christianity, but rejects the divinity of Christ. Islam and Christianity differ in that for Muslims Jesus is a Prophet, who was followed by the last Prophet, Mohamed. For Christians, Jesus is the incarnation of God in human form, and His incarnation is the final stage of the development of the faith - Mohamed is not a part of the equation and is in fact an impostor. This is the great division. Both Christians and Muslims reject the Talmud, which is the work of Satan. This is why Judaeo-Christianity is such an abomination.

My objection to the Church of England rests entirely on its negation of Christianity. Anglicanism behaves very much like Talmudic Judaism. Its officials have argued over Biblical text to the point that they have reversed dogma. The Decalogue is infallible, yet only Catholics obey all Ten Commandments. The Church of England makes a virtue out of sin - it approves of abortion (Murder), divorce (Adultery/Dishonouring family), materialism (Covetousness/Theft) etc. It is the very foundation of the Capitalism which has destroyed the Spiritual unity of Europe, and as such is indefensible.

The third accusation is as ridiculous as the others, but needs to be addressed due to the serious legal implications. I state categorically and unequivocally here and now that I am not, never have been, never will be, and do not condone anyone who is, an anti-Semite.

I am opposed to Internationalism in any form which oppresses ordinary people. In its present incarnation the most inhumane form of Internationalism is Zionism. Zionism is an Imperialistic philosophy which has successfully tied itself to an entire people and to a religion. The idea that Zionism equates to Jewishness is an evil and sickening lie. (See http://endwhiteguilt.blogspot.com for examples of Zionist Lies). Zionism is a philosophy. Its adherents come from a variety of faiths and races, which they use to hide their real core unifying faith which is Sabatteanism (Satanism). This spiritual poison has polluted all religions, of which Judaism is but one victim. It has very much become an integral part of the British Establishment and its Church, which is an important reason for exposing Royal Family, the diseased faith of Anglicanism and defending its opponent, Traditional (Pre-Vatican II) Catholicism. Indeed opposition to Zionism is in reality defence of all faiths which reject Satanism.

Racially, many of the key players (such as the Rothschilds) are Ashkenazi - many but not all. Opposition to Zionism does not mean opposition to the Ashkenazim as a people. The shrieking of anti-Semitism at those who discuss the Ashkenazi origins of the Rothschilds and theri partners-in-crime, the British Monarchy, comes from a blurring of the classification of who is racially a Jew. The original Jews of the Old Testament were Semites. The Semites who still practice the Jewish faith are known as the Sephardim. The Ashkenazim, in contrast, are the descendants of the Khazars from Central Asia, who converted en masse at the command of their Monarchy. Claiming the Ashkenazim are Jewish by race is like claiming that all Canadians who practice Islam are Arabs due to Islam originating in Arabia. The Sephardim are routinely persecuted by the Ashkenazi government of Israel. The Palestinians whose land the Rothschilds stole and misnamed Israel practice Sabatteanism behind the mask of Judaism, and are racially Caucasian. They are simply not Jews in faith or by race! The true anti-Semites are the rulers of Israel. If anything, those of us who expose Zionism should be classed as philo-Semites, as we favour a freedom for Palestine and the restoration of Torah Judaism with the eradication of Sabattean Talmudism.

Of interest to British and kindred people, there is as wealth of research which points to the probability of the original Israelites (who were the people of the Old Testament) leaving the region and relocating in Western Europe, especially the British Isles. If this is so, then it is highly likely that a significant proportion of modern Britons are descended from the Abrahamics, and are, at least in part, Semites. (See http://thy-weapon-of-war.blogspot.com/) This further weakens the label of anti-Semitism as that would in part be an attack on my own people. Much to the horror of the Judaeo-Protestants, and Royalist, I am an ardent defender of the true character of my people. This is why those who have swallowed the Establishment propaganda attack me on these grounds. If they would only think for themselves and not allow the Freemasonic Orange Odour, the Satanic Church of England, and the blood lust of Bnai Brit-ish materialist-Zionist-Imperialism, to dictate their thoughts, they would realise they are fighting for their own destruction, and that people such as myself are trying to defend them, even for all the animosity this brings.