Beullogeo's: November 2009

Monday, 30 November 2009

Switzerland Minus Minarets

Power to the Swiss people and the Schweizerische Volkspartei (SVP). The image caption reads, "Swiss quality, the middle class' party".

Swiss Ban Building of Minarets on Mosques - NYTimes.com:

The government must now draft a supporting law on the ban, a process that could take at least a year and could put Switzerland in breach of international conventions on human rights.

Apparently even the mildest, most indirect attempts to resist genocidal levels of immigration can put Whites in breach of "international conventions on human rights".

Of 150 mosques or prayer rooms in Switzerland, only 4 have minarets, and only 2 more minarets are planned. None conduct the call to prayer. There are about 400,000 Muslims in a population of some 7.5 million people. Close to 90 percent of Muslims in Switzerland are from Kosovo and Turkey, and most do not adhere to the codes of dress and conduct associated with conservative Muslim countries like Saudi Arabia, said Manon Schick, a spokeswoman for Amnesty International in Switzerland.

Nothing to see here. Only 5 percent of Switzerland's population is muslim, close to 100 percent of them cultural and genetic aliens.

“Most painful for us is not the minaret ban, but the symbol sent by this vote,” said Farhad Afshar, who runs the Coordination of Islamic Organizations in Switzerland. “Muslims do not feel accepted as a religious community.”

The kosovars, turks, and other muslims can go home, feel accepted, and build as many minarets as they like. Most painful for the Swiss is that if "international human rights" prevail it's only a matter of time before the Swiss will be entirely dispossessed of their one and only homeland.

To the consternation of anti-White internationalists resistance is beginning to come not just from the "nativist", "xenophobic", "racist", "nazi" SVP - but also from leftist feminists.

Women lead Swiss in vote to ban minarets - Times Online:

A right-wing campaign to outlaw minarets on mosques in a referendum being held in Switzerland today has received an unlikely boost from radical feminists arguing that the tower-like structures are “male power symbols” and reminders of Islam’s oppression of women.

A “stop the minarets” campaign has provoked ferment in the land of Heidi, where women are more likely than men to vote for the ban after warnings from prominent feminists that Islam threatens their rights.

This resistance is "right-wing" with "an unlikely boost" only if seen from an anti-White internationalist cheerleading point of view. Media bias isn't "liberal", it's anti-White.

Socialist politicians have been furious to see icons of the left joining what is regarded as an anti-immigrant campaign by the populist Swiss People’s party, the biggest group in parliament.

One of them, Julia Onken, warned that failure to ban minarets would be “a signal of the state’s acceptance of the oppression of women”. She has sent out 4,000 emails attacking Muslims who condone forced marriage, honour killings and beating women.

Normal, healthy people don't like being replaced by aliens who look, think, and act alien, obliterating their precious homeland and traditions before their very eyes, forever. Apparently, neither do radical feminists.

Swiss business is horrified. There are fears of a reaction against Swiss products similar to the one suffered by Denmark over the publication of cartoons depicting the prophet Muhammad in 2005.

“The brand ‘Swiss’ must continue to represent values such as openness, pluralism and freedom of religion,” said Hanspeter Rentsch, a member of the board of Swatch, the watchmaker.

It's more horrorifying that Swiss businessmen feel free to favor "brand 'Swiss'" over people Swiss. The irony is that openness and pluralism will eventually destroy the Swiss and all their "brands", and the freedom to build minarets will ultimately be very, very bad for business.

Can you guess who else thinks openness, pluralism and freedom of religion are more important than Swiss self-determination?

Push to ban minarets in Switzerland a 'threat':

Switzerland's biggest Jewish groups said Wednesday that a far-right push to ban the construction of minarets here was a "threat" to religious harmony and hindered the integration of Muslims.

- The referendum infringes religious freedom, a concept enshrined in the constitution - said the Swiss Federation of Jewish Communities and the Platform of Liberal Jews in Switzerland in a statement.

It - also poses a threat to peaceful relations between the religions and inhibits the integration endeavours of Muslims in Switzerland - they added.

This is pure double-talk. Immigration brings the threat to harmony. The Swiss citizenry, who to the extent they've been informed and consulted have expressed their disfavor for immigration, muslim or otherwise, and should not be forced to suffer it, whether the immigrants wish to "integrate" with them or not. It is their very existence which is being infringed. What gives "jewish communities", who have not integrated after more than two millenia among Europeans, any standing to lecture anyone about immigration or integration? They consider themselves jews first, not Swiss, so they can STFU or move to israel and lecture their own tribe about immigration and integration.

The two Jewish groups said they - take seriously the fears of the population that extremist ideas could be disseminated in Switzerland. -

- But banning minarets is no solution -- it only creates in Muslims in Switzerland a sense of alienation and discrimination - they said.

If creating a sense of alienation is the concern then surely the alienation the native Swiss feel at the sight of minarets in their homeland trumps the senses of migrant muslims and jews, who after all are only guests. What the Swiss and all other Whites should take seriously is how jews and muslims do not hesitate to "discriminate", i.e. identify with and advocate in favor of their own groups, even as they pathologize Whites for any attempt to do so.

It's true that banning minarets is no solution. Deporting aliens would be better, but even that wouldn't solve the problem. The problem is "international human rights". What horrifies Swiss business is the precedent for internationalist punishment that has already been set by organized jewry. See The Jewish Declaration of War on Nazi Germany: The Economic Boycott of 1933.

Why would any normal, healthy people want to see the dysfunctional middle east recreated inside their country's borders? In part because we're constantly told, as we're reminded here in this case, that it harms peaceful relations, harmony, and integration to see it this way. And in part because if we set that concern aside and persist then we're threatened - all the double-talk about peaceful relations, harmony, and integration aside - with open war.

Some pundits characterize what's happening to every White country, and only White countries, as "suicide", or "self-destruction" caused by "liberalism". This story of resistance from Switzerland, among others, puts the lie to that poisonous, blame-shifting meme.

UPDATE 2 Dec 2009: In a comment on Interview: Arthur Kemp, Hunter Wallace writes:

Banning minarets is treating symptoms, not the disease.

I disagree.

The disease is the idea, which produced its most fateful results during the Enlightenment in the service of emancipating jews, that Whites, and only Whites, must not "discriminate" against "minorities". Since this meme took root it has been fed and twisted to genocidal proportions. Whites everywhere now live under a regime which subsidizes, supports, and even directly imposes "discrimination" against Whites, defending the interests of interloping aliens over the interests of the native-born citizenry.

The banning of minarets by popular vote strikes only obliquely at this idea, but it is a blow against the disease itself. Organized jewry roundly condemns it for exactly this reason. "Liberal" feminists played a prominent part in the minaret ban, putting the lie to the corollary meme, pimped constantly by faux-White pro-jews and others, that "suicidal" White "liberalism" is to blame for all that ills us. Even "liberals", it turns out, resist when their "suicide" becomes too blatant. The genocide is inflicted in the name of "liberal" "non-discrimination" in name but not in fact, and it is inflicted by "the international community" - which means the plutocrats, their media, their jet-setting cosmopolitan courtiers, jewish groups, muslim groups, and the treaonous costume clowns who serve their interests in their governments.

"Treating symptoms" is more fairly applied to much of what conservatives do here in the US - for example, to their focus on the transfer of wealth via taxes or healthcare, never identifying who the wealth is transferred from or to; or to the "culture war", never identifying who's at war with whom.

The State will Provide - from Cradle to Grave

0 comments Posted by VA at 06:06

England is a mess - not only England, but the entire European World. The decline of our world hasn't happened over night, but it certainly has accelerated in recent years. Apologists for the modern malaise will argue that those of us who object to our demise are 'dinosaurs' who yearn for a golden age which never existed. They are wrong. We object, not out of some misplaced romanticism, but out of an understanding of the bigger picture. We understand that the death of our way of life is not a natural and inevitable event, but is rather a carefully calculated assault on us which aims to remove all obstacles to the complete global slave state which our mis-rulers have been constructing for hundreds of years and are now near to realising.

The assault on our culture and our ability to defend ourselves is the more pernicious because it comes from within. To be more accurate, the assault is organised by a self-serving cabal who have manipulated an entire sub-section of society that it carries out the work which the cabal are numerically unable to do. Social engineering has wrought more damage than any foreign invasion or war ever has. Our demise has been stage managed by those in authority.

How have our mis-rulers forced their agenda upon us? There are many methods they have used, but most notable have been the campaigns to control people economically, spiritually, and mentally, all of which are interweaved.

Economically, the Establishment have taxed the population to the point where those who work are financially crippled. The progressive income tax system punishes those who are educated and skilled. By taking more and more money from the workers, the Establishment ensures that the vast majority of them are denied financial independence. The Establishment, of course, create 'money' and thereby are separate from the rest of us who must work until we die, just to survive. Certainly some people are able to retire at a relatively young age, but they must still sacrifice most of their lives in order to achieve a semblance of financial security - and this is only for themselves; the following generation is pulled back into the work-trap and must live in economic serfdom.

At the lower end of the economic spectrum are the shiftless underclass. These come in different forms. There are the involuntarily unemployed, and those who choose to live at the expense of the workers. The very term unemployed means unused - and points to the thinking of the Establishment. Employment has become synonymous with manipulation. In the past, people worked in order to provide for their own. They worked the land on small-holdings and bartered with artisans for luxuries. This noble and honourable form of living is mocked as the lifestyle of the peasantry. In England, the Peasants have been replaced by wage-slaves and the Lumpenproletariat - the latter of whom are a growing burden on the hard-taxed former, and a menace to the very fabric of society.

The Lumpenproletariat are a thorn in the side of the majority. This is by design. By reducing the Spiritual element of the English character to a mockery of its true self, the need to live in compassion and cooperation has been replaced by a completely alien ethos of greed and selfishness. Before our nation succumbed to the corrupting influence of the alien elite which had burrowed into its Ruling Class, we had our Faith to protect us. The essence of that Faith was mutual respect and the observance of the Decalogue. With the Faith subverted, the alien anti-values which are now so apparent began to take root. The Underclass exist because they have been deliberately nurtured in order to destroy those who hold true to our real values and sense of worth.

The process of smashing the self-respect and mutual support which has been the strength of all Europeans, has been a long one. In England in particular, the first stage was to destroy the spiritual backbone of the nation by tearing it away from its Christian roots, and foisting upon it an alien mindset which shared nothing with real Christianity other than the symbols and the name, but was in fact a version of its irreconcilable enemy and opposite, Talmudism. Having removed the spiritual support, and embedded a destructive cuckoo in its place, the focus was upon 'the Protestant Work Ethic', which made a virtue out of wage-slavery. With the ascension of Capitalism to a position where those who suffered under it were so manipulated as to see it as a positive thing, the next stage was to implode the economy and remove the comfort afforded by the economic system which was responsible for the ills afflicting the people.

Through manufactured war and the internationalist agenda of relocating industry and other forms of work to far-flung parts of the world, the self-sufficiency of every nation was smashed. Accompanying this was the massive movement of people across the globe, removing the homogeneity of each land which had formed the very essence of the culture. This reduced people form members of a distinctive nation, with a strong sense of culture, spiritual identity, family, and kinship, into atomised consuming individuals. The final stage was to destroy any sense of pride in personal achievement, and replace the dignity of labour with a pride in idleness. This was achieved via the Welfare State which was officially created to protect the masses from hardship, but, as with all political phenomena, in true double-speak, served to drag people into a dependent state of subsistence living, with a harsh taxation system making it economically senseless to attempt to live by working, rather than on benefits.

With an entire strata of society being born into the Welfare system, it then became necessary to destroy any respect for civilised behaviour and decency. To this end, the legal system was turned into a mockery of justice. Punishment for crime was gradually reduced in severity, under the lie of 'human rights', to the point where all deterrents were removed. Pop music, films, and the news media were manipulated to glorify violence and crimes against property and people. In contrast, crimes against the Establishment were ceaselessly pushed in the popular media as abhorrent and unacceptable. To this end, Holocaust denial became a focus of evil, but rape, murder and theft became 'cool'.

We now live in a ludicrous situation where the Welfare System provides a comfortable existence for people who know how to manipulate the system. The State have very kindly provided an army of 'do-gooders' to help people to scrounge their way to a life of leisure. By taxing workers beyond any measure of what is reasonable, and paying the rent and council tax of the unemployed (in addition to a fortnightly handout for beer etc), it has now become pointless to take minimum wage jobs as one can 'earn' as much sitting on one's backside as one can by working for the basic rate and then paying all one's own bills. People who own their own houses do not have their mortgages paid so must take slave wages or face eviction - and in the latter case, they will be housed at the expense of the tax-payer! This removes any incentive to own property - but of course that is the idea of the Communitarian, aka Communist, Establishment who spout the mantra "Property is Theft" (at least, Property for others). Madness.

The legal system has been equally distorted. Bleeding hearty liberals employed as Probation workers, Prison Governors etc have made prisons so lax that they no longer are a deterrent. The prisons are now so overcrowded that Courts are ordered by the State to only remand people in exceptional circumstances. Instead, criminals are tagged electronically and given curfews - thus allowing them to continue their criminal activities hindered only by having to be at home for set periods (usually night-time). They may also have to give urine samples for drug analysis once a week, and undertake a couple of hours unpaid work per week. It really does prove how lax the Prison system is that criminals will offend over and over whilst on a non-custodial Court Order in order to be incarcerated for a couple of weeks to quash the Probation requirements! They WANT to go to prison! But why wouldn't they? In prison they have access to more heroin, crack etc than they could dream of outside, and due to 'human rights' campaigners they do not have to do any work at all, and must be provided with leisure and educational facilities. For many people, Prison accommodation is preferable to that which they have in the real world, and it is a great place to network with other criminals.

The scum class which has emerged as a visible strata of society did not appear over night. However, since the 1960s when the Frankfurt School Revolution really began to bite into the culture of the European nations, the rise of the dregs of humanity to prominence has proceeded at an alarming rate. The Zionist Frankfurt School has attempted to destroy our nations by destroying our peoples. By importing masses of unassimiable aliens, breeding retards and cripples who should have died in infancy, and encouraging all manner of greed and deviancy, they have tangibly damaged our nations. They have, however, over-reached themselves. By encouraging the inherent vices of the underclass, they have exposed the weaknesses of our people.

Decent people must refuse to aid the parasites amongst us. We must turn the assault upon our people into an opportunity to eliminate the vermin who walk amongst us. The Zionist mafia who have created this mess must be removed from our lands and never allowed to re-enter. Those who have become trapped in the Welfare System by no fault of their own must be helped by being encouraged to work outside the system - indeed we must all find ways to trade with one another and work without exchanging the fiat money which feeds the Zionist machine. For the hard-core of scum who are congenitally hostile to our well-being, we must be thankful that they are now so visible, and take the opportunity to identify them, protect ourselves from them, and remove all sustenance they take from our well-meaning but foolish support. For now, this is all we can do. We must save all we can, who deserve to be saved. When we emerge from this struggle victorious over the forces of evil, then we can exact a permanent justice which will make our enemies quake - but that is for a later time.

Friday, 27 November 2009

The New Soviet takes shape

0 comments Posted by VA at 02:10

Nigel Farage, MEP for the UK Independence Party is an interesting character. At face value he is a man fighting for his country against the leviathan of the European (Soviet) Union. However, when one digs a little below the media-manufactured image, one finds that alike to the 'Great White Hope' Vaclav Klaus (President of the former nation of the Czech Republic), he is a member of Faction Two, which is not an entity which is overly preoccupied with National Freedom.

Vaclav Klaus hoodwinked the people of Europe into a cosy state in which those who could see the evil behind the Lisbon Treaty were dulled into a position of inaction in the belief that the white haired old man would save us in the event of a 'Yes' vote in Ireland. It was believed that the Irish would hold out against the Lisbon Treaty, but if they did not, it didn't really matter, as (Santa) Klaus would refuse to sign the Treaty until the British General Election, after which the incoming Conservative administration would guarantee the British people a referendum, and the Treaty would be killed. The result of this ruse was that aside from Sinn Fein, who fought valiantly for Irish and European Freedom, the Irish 'No' campaign was badly organised. The rest of the nations of Europe left the Irish to fend for themselves, and as such were complicit in their own downfall. Knowing full well that the British would reject the Treaty, the moment the 'Yes' result was achieved, the stooge Klaus, signed it, and it became an irreversible part of European Law, sealing the fate of everyone in new Soviet bloc.

Considering Farage's links to Faction Two, one must have a healthy skepticism when considering whether he is sincere in his desire to restore British independence. Alike to his colleague Klaus, he may be just another puppet taking the spotlight upon himself, in order to draw attention away from the real manoeuvres of the power elite. He has stated that the European Parliament and President Van Rompuy are powerless mouthpieces of the European Commission. This is true. However, he fails to mention that the Commission itself exists as a front for the real rulers of Europe who exercise power through it. This omission is worrisome to say the least.

Regardless of the true agenda of Farage and UKIP, he has made a great many statements which have highlighted the corruption in the European institutions. It could be a case of putting the truth into the public arena in order to gain a mandate for tyranny when there is no serious reaction to the horrors he reveals. be that as it may, this week he has made some very interesting points about the undemocratic nature of the EU.

Focusing upon the former member of the Communist Party of Great Britain, and the Soviet front group CND, now Baroness Ashton, EU High Representative for Foreign Affairs, Farage had the following to say:

(President Van Rompuy is) "at least..an elected politician unlike (Commissioner/Commissar) Baroness Ashton...In some ways she’s ideal isn’t she...She has never had a proper job, and has never been elected to anything in her life, so I guess she’s perfect for this European Union...She married well, she married an advisor and a friend and a supporter of Tony Blair and got put in the House of Lords, when she was put in the House of Lords she was given one big job, and the job was to get the Lisbon Treaty through the House of Lords, and to do so pretending that it was entirely different to the EU Constitution…and she vigorously crushed any attempt in the House of Lords for the British people to have a referendum...she’s not been elected and the people don’t have the power to remove her...Baroness Ashton...has never been elected to public office in her entire life, she takes an enormously powerful job and the peoples of Europe do not have the power to hold her to account and to remove her and that fundamentally is what is wrong with this whole European Union, it’s all about bureaucracy versus democracy.”

Every Word spoken by Farage about Ashton and the other Commissars, sorry Commissioners, is true. It will be interesting to see just how far the EU will go to silence Farage. If he is just playing a role in a carefully choreographed pantomime, then we may expect to see him perform for some time. If, however, he is genuinely fighting against the Globalist agenda, then like the last great British Prime Minister, Neville Chamberlain, who ignored the warnings of the Zionist cabal who needed the British and German Empires to destroy one another, it would come as no surprise should he mysteriously fall ill and be permanently removed from the political arena.

If Farage is anything other than yet another clown in the circus of European politics, then no doubt we can expect to see the internationalist imperialist British Zionist Party, sorry BNP, rolled out to entertain the Euro-sceptic population. This is precisely what they have been groomed to do, and why they have seats in the European Parliament. This is how democracy works, and why no one should have any faith in it.

The USSR didn't bother with a multi-party front behind which the tyrants could have operated without anyone seeing them for the butchers and usurers they are. The new Soviet doesn't need an anti-Soviet mirror as it is but a stage away from going global. The multi-party charade will allow any real dissidents to be identified and neutralised.

This blog post is illegal under the 1999 ruling of the European Court Of Justice (case 274/99), which criminalises criticism of the EU. Legislation has been prepared which will outlaw all parties which are in favour of national independence, justifying this abuse of freedom in true politically correct form as legislation to protect people against Xenophobia. Forget the Party system. That game belongs to the Establishment.

Freedom comes from realising that you don't need Parties and Personalities to fight for you - you just need to stop participating in your own enslavement. Say No to Zionism, to politicians and bureaucrats, and to everyone who wants to restrict your freedom. Your Freedom cannot be taken from you unless you allow it. Don't assist our common enemy. Spread the truth and build the Resistance. Our oppressors are few, and will fail when we accept that we are strong.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0vBqyG6qYXE&feature=player_embedded

http://www.youtube.com/user/ukipmeps

Thursday, 26 November 2009

Planet of the Michelle Obama Defenders

0 comments Posted by VA at 09:57

Google apologizes for results of 'Michelle Obama' image search - CNN.com:

For most of the past week, when someone typed "Michelle Obama" in the popular search engine Google, one of the first images that came up was a picture of the American first lady altered to resemble a monkey.

On Wednesday morning, the racially offensive image appeared to have been removed from any Google Image searches for "Michelle Obama."

Google officials could not immediately be reached for comment.

Google faced a firestorm of criticism over the episode. First, it banned the Web site that posted the photo, saying it could spread a malware virus. Then, when the image appeared on another Web site, Google let the photo stand. When a Google image search brought up the photo, an apologetic Google ad occasionally appeared above it.

The Michelle Obama ape photo can be found at FlyStyleLife » WTF IS THIS? MICHELLE OBAMA AS AN APE HUH?

Google: An explanation of our search results:

Sometimes Google search results from the Internet can include disturbing content, even from innocuous queries. We assure you that the views expressed by such sites are not in any way endorsed by Google.

Search engines are a reflection of the content and information that is available on the Internet. A site's ranking in Google's search results relies heavily on computer algorithms using thousands of factors to calculate a page's relevance to a given query.

The beliefs and preferences of those who work at Google, as well as the opinions of the general public, do not determine or impact our search results. Individual citizens and public interest groups do periodically urge us to remove particular links or otherwise adjust search results. Although Google reserves the right to address such requests individually, Google views the integrity of our search results as an extremely important priority. Accordingly, we do not remove a page from our search results simply because its content is unpopular or because we receive complaints concerning it. We will, however, remove pages from our results if we believe the page (or its site) violates our Webmaster Guidelines, if we believe we are required to do so by law, or at the request of the webmaster who is responsible for the page.

We apologize if you've had an upsetting experience using Google. We hope you understand our position regarding offensive results.

Sincerely,
The Google Team

Insincerely, actually. In truth, hit rank for almost every search engine, and certainly for google, is based almost entirely on the popularity of the hit, which in most cases reflects its popularity with the general public. Google is lying to the public even while apologizing to the hypersensitive people offended by popular opinion.

Google returns lots of insulting, defamatory search results. See for example (with SafeSearch off):

george bush
laura bush
bush twins
michele bachmann
ann coulter
glenn beck

Why does google protect Michelle Obama from ridicule? Who else does it protect? Hypersensitive people offended by impious use of the word jew, of course.

Monday, 23 November 2009

Answers to Imbeciles

0 comments Posted by VA at 04:46

I do not normally respond to the accusations of ne'er do wells, axe-grinders and others who enjoy spreading dis-info and making pointless and unworthy accusations. However, since I have changed tactics and begun posting blog articles to a wide variety of fora and social networks, I have become the focus of an orchestrated attack. Rather than answer the accusations individually - which is a massive waste of valuable time and effort, I shall answer the accusations here, and link my response as applicable.

The attacks I have received come in two main strands. Firstly, insinuations about how I earn a living, and secondly outright accusations that I am an advocate of the dissolution of the Church of England, which, it is maintained, is a bad thing. Thirdly, I am accused of anti-Semitism. I will answer these accusations in turn.

Firstly, there is the accusation that what I do for a living impacts upon what I write. Well, obviously, it does. It seems to me that a lot of the people who complain that I do work, are themselves shiftless, and happy to be doley scroungers. These people get their information from the tabloids, and the mainstream media. Other than 'news' from Establishment sources, those who rail against me tend to be Party activists, who receive politically-biased stories from the parties to which they belong. They take the propaganda they absorb at face value and do not question its validity. If the Party says that all the ills of the world are caused by people who eat bread, these activists will take it upon themselves to attack bakeries - whilst munching on a sandwich no doubt. Parties exist to spread propaganda, and if that happens to contain a reasonable degree of truth, then that is a happy coincidence. By using sources which are forbidden by the Party hierarchy, I am seen as a part of the enemy. In truth, by refusing to access all sources, Party activists are denying themselves the ability to see beyond the contrived version of reality the Establishment and the party create for them. They are going into the battle blindfolded - and hate anyone who refuses to cover his or her eyes and dares to search for the truth.

There does seem to be a bizarre train of thought which maintains that people who work can't be trusted. People who undertake menial tasks are seen as a threat, and God forbid anyone tries to climb out of the trap of minimum wage slavery and secure a position where he or she can provide for his or her family! It needs to be understood that by working in jobs which are not run-of-the-mill, people gain access to information which unemployed layabouts and unskilled wage-slaves cannot. I am fortunate in that my job is very interesting, and it does allow me to examine the workings of the State. To a limited degree I am privy to information which the public at large is not - and I use this first hand knowledge against the Establishment itself. We're not going to change a thing by shouting against the system from the outside - we need to get to its very core to do that. I make no apology for working, and for working my way into the beast. Only with knowledge of what 'they' are really doing, can 'they' be stopped

If all those who opposed the system were to get inside it, then it could be dismantled overnight. Attacking it from a position of ignorance, where the only information you have is what they want you to have, is to play a part in their pantomime - and to actively participate in furthering their agenda. This is beyond pointless - it helps reinforce the Establishment. If we are to defeat this monster, we have to know what we are fighting, and how best to go about it. Withdrawing our support by refusing to participate in their games is a key step. The system exists because people prop it up. Removing that prop is an essential part of the struggle.

The most repugnant aspect of the work-related attack upon me is the insinuation that I work for the Security Services, as some sort of 'double agent' - this is sheer lunacy! I am an individual who is aware of what is going on in the world around me, and can see that the traditional methods of opposition are controlled by the very enemy they purport to oppose. Those who cling to the Party System feel threatened by those who have escaped it and can see it for the farce that it always has been and always will be. I have noticed that it is common practice to refer to people who do not fit into the ideological boxes which have been constructed to keep the opposition in line, as State assets, informers, infiltrators etc. certainly such people do exist, and a careful eye must be kept out for them. But attacking anyone who doesn't toe the Party-line is sheer idiocy. Working with people who ideologically (and even personally) hate one another makes sense if the end result is positive for the restoration of freedom. The Establishment has constructed a web to keep us at each others throats. We must stop this childish behaviour and form alliances issue by issue to dismantle our common enemy. Thinking and acting as an individual is dangerous to those who make a living from the Party system, and those cannot see the reality beyond it. It doesn't make one a State plant - the notion is ludicrous and shows a lack of imagination and a degree of paranoia in the accuser.

As to the second accusation - that I oppose the Church of England. in a single word - Yes! I have written in detail about how until the Judaic takeover of Britain facilitated by the Royals, England was the staunchest Catholic nation of them all. Those who defend Judaeo-protestantism are pawns for the Establishment, who are blinded by an irrational hatred which doesn't stand up to scrutiny. Catholicism in its pure form is the strongest defence against Talmudism that Christians have. Ironically, after that there is really only Islam. England would be better off if it converted to Islam than it is being a tool of Protestantism, aka, Pharaseeism. And, I make no apology for that statement either.

Of the religions of Christianity, Islam and (Talmudic) Judaism, the oldest is Christianity. When the Jews broke the covenant by killing Christ, they established a new religion. The Talmud is the Holy book of the Judaic religion and negates everything Christianity stands for. Christianity and Judaism are as different as black is to white. Islam is interesting insofar as it attempts to synthesise elements of pre-Talmudic Judaism with Christianity, but rejects the divinity of Christ. Islam and Christianity differ in that for Muslims Jesus is a Prophet, who was followed by the last Prophet, Mohamed. For Christians, Jesus is the incarnation of God in human form, and His incarnation is the final stage of the development of the faith - Mohamed is not a part of the equation and is in fact an impostor. This is the great division. Both Christians and Muslims reject the Talmud, which is the work of Satan. This is why Judaeo-Christianity is such an abomination.

My objection to the Church of England rests entirely on its negation of Christianity. Anglicanism behaves very much like Talmudic Judaism. Its officials have argued over Biblical text to the point that they have reversed dogma. The Decalogue is infallible, yet only Catholics obey all Ten Commandments. The Church of England makes a virtue out of sin - it approves of abortion (Murder), divorce (Adultery/Dishonouring family), materialism (Covetousness/Theft) etc. It is the very foundation of the Capitalism which has destroyed the Spiritual unity of Europe, and as such is indefensible.

The third accusation is as ridiculous as the others, but needs to be addressed due to the serious legal implications. I state categorically and unequivocally here and now that I am not, never have been, never will be, and do not condone anyone who is, an anti-Semite.

I am opposed to Internationalism in any form which oppresses ordinary people. In its present incarnation the most inhumane form of Internationalism is Zionism. Zionism is an Imperialistic philosophy which has successfully tied itself to an entire people and to a religion. The idea that Zionism equates to Jewishness is an evil and sickening lie. (See http://endwhiteguilt.blogspot.com for examples of Zionist Lies). Zionism is a philosophy. Its adherents come from a variety of faiths and races, which they use to hide their real core unifying faith which is Sabatteanism (Satanism). This spiritual poison has polluted all religions, of which Judaism is but one victim. It has very much become an integral part of the British Establishment and its Church, which is an important reason for exposing Royal Family, the diseased faith of Anglicanism and defending its opponent, Traditional (Pre-Vatican II) Catholicism. Indeed opposition to Zionism is in reality defence of all faiths which reject Satanism.

Racially, many of the key players (such as the Rothschilds) are Ashkenazi - many but not all. Opposition to Zionism does not mean opposition to the Ashkenazim as a people. The shrieking of anti-Semitism at those who discuss the Ashkenazi origins of the Rothschilds and theri partners-in-crime, the British Monarchy, comes from a blurring of the classification of who is racially a Jew. The original Jews of the Old Testament were Semites. The Semites who still practice the Jewish faith are known as the Sephardim. The Ashkenazim, in contrast, are the descendants of the Khazars from Central Asia, who converted en masse at the command of their Monarchy. Claiming the Ashkenazim are Jewish by race is like claiming that all Canadians who practice Islam are Arabs due to Islam originating in Arabia. The Sephardim are routinely persecuted by the Ashkenazi government of Israel. The Palestinians whose land the Rothschilds stole and misnamed Israel practice Sabatteanism behind the mask of Judaism, and are racially Caucasian. They are simply not Jews in faith or by race! The true anti-Semites are the rulers of Israel. If anything, those of us who expose Zionism should be classed as philo-Semites, as we favour a freedom for Palestine and the restoration of Torah Judaism with the eradication of Sabattean Talmudism.

Of interest to British and kindred people, there is as wealth of research which points to the probability of the original Israelites (who were the people of the Old Testament) leaving the region and relocating in Western Europe, especially the British Isles. If this is so, then it is highly likely that a significant proportion of modern Britons are descended from the Abrahamics, and are, at least in part, Semites. (See http://thy-weapon-of-war.blogspot.com/) This further weakens the label of anti-Semitism as that would in part be an attack on my own people. Much to the horror of the Judaeo-Protestants, and Royalist, I am an ardent defender of the true character of my people. This is why those who have swallowed the Establishment propaganda attack me on these grounds. If they would only think for themselves and not allow the Freemasonic Orange Odour, the Satanic Church of England, and the blood lust of Bnai Brit-ish materialist-Zionist-Imperialism, to dictate their thoughts, they would realise they are fighting for their own destruction, and that people such as myself are trying to defend them, even for all the animosity this brings.

I have wasted a lot of time and energy arguing these points with people who refuse to abandon their idols. This article will serve as an answer to those who wish to defame me. we don't have the luxury of time to bicker amongst ourselves. Hopefully those who worship the Monarchy and Anglicanism, and argue that we must defend Israel at all costs, will realise they are worshipping their greatest enemies - before it is too late.

War: What is it Good for? International Finance!

0 comments Posted by VA at 03:16

History is a catalogue of wars. In Europe, none was so devastating as the Great War of 1914-18, which differed from those which preceded it insofar as the result was not the transfer of power from one European nation to another, but the diminishing of power for all European nations, including those not actively involved. The Great War saw the dismemberment of many European nations, the merging of others, and the subjugation of many to Zionist control. All these factors contributed to the destabilisation of Europe and set the scene for the next war - which was, of course, the whole idea.

Official historians constantly tell us that the Great War was caused by the shooting of Franz Ferdinand. What they fail to mention is that he was not the only prominent figured to be killed in the run up to the outbreak of war. Europe was twitching with war fever, and had the murder of Ferdinand not been the excuse for the slaughter of the common people (and the financial gain of the Rothschilds et al), another excuse would have been very easily found. The War was a staged event, which sadly saw the real destruction of European civilisation, and the murders by official decree, of millions of people who were used to advance the Globalist agenda.

The only victor in any war is the cabal which funds it. Wall Street financed the Nazis and the Communists, and made a massive profit from the further destruction which followed within three decades of the end of the Great War. The Rothschilds, as financiers to the Globalist elite, have funded every side of every war, since the Napoleonic era. Before that, the Rothschild name may not be found, but the same bloodlines are apparent.

War is a con trick. A very sick and barbaric trick which involves blood sacrifice and theft to transfer power and wealth further away from the people whilst making them feel that the Establishment is acting for them out of duty and kinship. War isn't stupid - War is sick. War for defence is one matter, war for greed is another matter altogether.

Internationalism and capitalism have brought the world to a state where the military is used to advance corporate interests. The Armed Forces are the paid mercenaries of the Rothschilds and their Royal partners-in-crime. This is a very sorry state of affairs. The Zionist Kissinger referred to soldiers as 'stupid beasts' to be used as the political-financial power structure see fit. This is no mere insult; it is actually how they are being used. This makes a mockery of the raison d'etre of the common soldier.

People join the military in order to protect their own people. Certainly some misfits have ulterior motives, but in the main, people join for honourable reasons. They then find themselves being shipped all over the world to fight for big business and the Global super-power which is THE biggest threat to EVERY nation. Soldiers are enforcing embargoes which are starving to death civilians in Iraq (etc), protecting terrorists such as Tony Blair and the Queen, and protecting Opium fields in Afghanistan in order to flood the homeland with poison which kills our people and provides revenue to our enemies - this is not right, and shames all involved.

The military must be brought home. The US Army would be better deployed protecting the border with Mexico, eliminating anyone trying to illegally enter the nation that way - which is a form of invasion, and as such an act of aggression against US soil which merits, nay demands, the most serious consequences. The British Navy should be deployed in our seas sinking ships of immigrants and drug dealers. Likewise, the military forces of Europe should be deployed along the border keeping the Asiatics and Africans out. Transport aeroplanes which are bringing drugs into Europe ad America should be used to get the non-European population out of our homelands and by so doing helping to fight in the War of European Genocide, which has been going on since the 1940s (or earlier), but on OUR side, not on the side of the internationalist enemy which is using them to destroy us!

The military should be used to ensure our borders are secure, and the homogeneity of our people is protected. That is what they are for - to defend our peoples, not to advance multi-culti-rootless cosmopolitanism and the Zionist mafia who are pushing this agenda for their own purposes.

Sunday, 22 November 2009

Quick Links, 22 Nov 2009

0 comments Posted by VA at 09:04

In the Battle Between Facebook and MySpace, A Digital 'White Flight' | The New York Observer - Berkeley grad student examines online social networks and sees metaphorical "White Flight", which is something bad people do, because integration is what every good person should want.

ADL Special Reports: Rage Grows in America: Anti-Government Conspiracies - The Influence of the Mainstream Media - organized jewry can't stomach even buffoonish deracinated zionist Whites like Glenn Beck. They don't like the philo-semitic Oath Keepers either. It's enraging.

Bashing Palin and the horse she rides in on. Too many Whites scares Chris Matthews - "I think there is a tribal aspect to this thing, in other words, White vs. other people."

Semitic tribal aspects at Princeton. The Death of the Grown-Up | Diana West - "This is how it works: Defy Islamic supremacism and be demonized as a supremacist." Substitute "jewish" for "islamic" and you get... Choosing the chosen people - The Daily Princetonian - a student body that's 13% jewish isn't good enough, it should be 25% jewish like Harvard, Brown, Columbia and Penn. Commenters clash.

A cartoon croons, Not My Waterpark. Tragic comedy, not at all funny.

Thursday, 12 November 2009

Who Thinks Thinking is Unthinkable and Why

0 comments Posted by VA at 19:44

Jewish "social critic" James Howard Kunstler has specialized in ridiculing suburbia while paying relatively little attention to the non-White immigration, non-White sociopathy, and forced integration motivating Whites to flock there. The disproportionately jewish race-hustlers, developers, and financiers enriching themselves in the process also get a pass. Kunstler's made a living hyping a variety of threats, like Y2K and depleted uranium, and warning most recently that "peak oil" will cause a "long emergency". The effect, if not intent, has been to direct attention away from the more immediate and more substantial problems for more Americans, especially White Americans - the displacement and dispossession caused by genocidal levels of immigration and systemic financial fraud, each fueling the other.

Lately Kunstler has been keeping a nervous eye on a particular facet of the fraud. In Thinking the Unthinkable he writes:

How bad is the situation 'out there' really? In my view, things are veering toward such extreme desperation that the US government might fall under the sway, by extra-electoral means, of an ambitious military officer, or a group of such, sometime in the near future. I'm not promoting a coup d'etat, you understand, but I am raising it as a realistic possibility as elected officials prove utterly unwilling to cope with a mounting crisis of capital and resources. The 'corn-pone Hitler' scenario is still another possibility - Glen Beck and Sarah Palin vying for the hearts and minds of the morons who want 'to keep gubmint out of Medicare!' - but I suspect that there is a growing cadre of concerned officers around the Pentagon who will not brook that fucking nonsense for a Crystal City minute and, what's more, would be very impatient to begin correcting the many fiascos currently blowing the nation apart from within. Remember, today's US military elite is battle-hardened after eight years of war in Asia. No doubt they love their country, as Julius Caesar and Napoleon Bonaparte loved theirs. It may pain them to stand by and watch it dissolve like a castle made of sugar in a winter gale.

I do believe it might pain Kunstler to watch israel dissolve. It certainly doesn't pain him to watch and snark at "the morons" while it happens to America. Does he think what Goldman Sachs and friends have been doing is unethical, unfair, unjust, immoral, illegal, indefensible, or just plain slimy? Maybe. But for sure he's concerned how the rubes will react when they find out. He's afraid it might be bad for jews. And he thinks that's unthinkable.

This isn't the first time Kunstler has expressed such fears. Hunter Wallace (formerly Prozium) wrote about Kunstler in Cornpone Nazism toward the end of July, linking to a Kunstler essay titled Evil Syndicated. I'll excerpt a few bits to illustrate how Kunstler recognizes Goldman is creating a problem, but that the real problem is the potential backlash.

By now, everyone in that fraction of the world that pays attention to something other than American Idol and their platter of TGI Friday's loaded potato skins knows that Goldman Sachs has been caught at another racket in the stock market: front-running trades. What a clever gambit, done with the help of the markets themselves - the Nasdaq in particular - in which information on trades is held back a fraction of a second from public view, while the data is shoveled to the computers of privileged subscribers who can execute zillions of programmed micro-trades before the rest of the herd makes a move. This allows them to vacuum up hundreds of millions of dollars by doing absolutely nothing of value.

Don't mistake Kunstler's accurate description here for disapproval. If anything he sees it as a "clever" way to shear "the herd".

In any sensible society - i.e. a society with an instinct for self-preservation - it would be against the law and the people doing it would be sent to prison.

Maybe the larger question is: since when did we become a society lacking the instinct for self-preservation - that is, a society bent on suicide?

Yes, a sensible society would have stopped Madoff and Hasan too. Whites have an instinct for self-preservation. We express it all the time, even though doing so has long been pathologized and is becoming increasingly criminalized. Since when? It's been getting worse ever since jewish emancipation. The proper word for what's happening, by the way, is genocide, not suicide. It's done over our objections. Jews like Kunstler aid and abet the crime by hyping symptoms rather than causes, and misdirecting blame. They see "anti-semitism" everywhere because they're not suicidal.

I think the larger question for Kunstler is: what's best for jews? The larger question for me is: when will Whites take note of this jewish obsession with themselves and their own interests? And when will we see through the dissembling of jewish "social critics" who ridicule and pathologize everything we do to resist what they misrepresent as "suicide"?

As we turn the corner toward autumn, President Obama looks increasingly like a dupe, a tool, or a co-conspirator of Goldman Sachs.

What bothers me is that, sooner or later, the conduct of Goldman Sachs will lead the growing ranks of the unemployed, foreclosed, disentitled, and hopeless into the hands of a savage right wing seeking mindless vengeance, for instance, against "the Jews," (as represented by Goldman Sachs), or brown-skinned people (as embodied by a vilified president).

"It's that brown-skinned guy's fault! Blame him!"

What bothers me is that Kunstler is saying that blaming the group who is responsible is "mindless", because he's acutely mindful that it might be bad for "the jews" and "brown-skinned people". Note however that even as Kunstler does this he feels perfectly free casting aspersions on Whites (as represented by "the savage right wing"), and white-skinned people (as embodied by the "evil syndicated"/"cornpone nazis"). What we have here is a conflict of group interests. Rather than addressing it honestly Kunstler tries to obscure and caricaturize it, advising those who already have their hands on "the growing ranks of the unemployed, foreclosed, disentitled, and hopeless" how to best manipulate them.

Readers of this blog know I'm allergic to conspiracy theories. But surveying the scene out there, it is hard to not conclude that Goldman Sachs has become the "front-runner" of a criminal syndicate defrauding US taxpayers.

Kunstler knows it's hard because he's tried. Now he's trying something more familiar and easier: scapegoating Whites.

In the meantime, the US economy gives the illusion of recovery - but to what? Back to a "consumer" credit card shopping orgy? Another house-buying fiesta?

There you go. One last kick in the nuts for the evil morons. Pay no mind to the hedge fund managers who might be called to account for ripping off the evil morons, if only in Kunstler's nightmares.

Kunstler's not the only "social critic" who's thinks it's important to suppress/redirect the backlash.

Oy! Noam Chomsky Compares Right-Wing Media To “Nazis”:

The memory that comes to my mind — I don’t want to press the analogy too hard, but I think it’s worth thinking about — is late Weimar Germany. There were people with real grievances, and the Nazis gave them an answer. ‘It’s the fault of the Jews and the Bolsheviks and we’ve got to protect ourselves from them, and that will take care of them.’ And you know what happened…

[...]Germany in the 1920s was at the peak of Western civilization. A decade later, it was at the pits of human history.

Chomsky's characterization of those two decades is from a jewish point of view, which is likely the opposite of how a contemporary native German would have described them.

Unless an answer can be given to these people, unless they can be led to understand what’s really happening to them, we could be in for trouble.

"We" could be in for trouble? Me and mine are already in trouble. We are ruled by a corrupt and illegitimate regime whose highest priority is to drown us in "people of color", each and every one of which is afforded special rights over Whites. To even question this is considered a crime. Why should we care about the trouble the fraudsters and the "social critics" spinning excuses for them might suffer? They don't care about our troubles.

Wednesday, 11 November 2009

Our Own Worst Enemy

0 comments Posted by VA at 05:40

The plan for Global Government is not new. In one form or another it is a plan which has been around since not long after the last Global Government dissolved in the time before officially recorded and acknowledged history. For people living since that time, it has either been a utopian dream or a dystopian nightmare. Until now it has never felt like anything but a fantasy. Now it is only a very short time from becoming reality.

The proof of the imminence of the Global State is all around for everyone to see. It is testament to the power of those who control the media that through their mendacious technology they are able to at once announce their agenda, and at the same time convince people that there is no agenda, and that only lunatic 'conspiracy theorists' would believe there is one.

The influence of the media can be experienced in everyday conversation; such as the statements "we won the game/war/election" spoken by people who may be spectators of the media show, but not direct participants. Many people who have seen through the lie of democracy and know that neither the Party of Government nor the Party of Opposition can be trusted, still believe that change can come through elections! They see that Parliamentary Democracy is a sham, but are so conditioned that they cannot grasp that it isn't a simple case of the main parties being corrupt, but rather it is a fact that the system itself is so constructed as to corrupt everyone who participates in any effective manner. How so? By making effective participation possible only for those who have been compromised and accepted the geld of the Zionist mafia.

In recent times Nationalists across Europe have won many seats in the European Parliament. At the same time, the Lisbon Treaty has passed and the Copenhagen Treaty which will seal the fate of all of us will be in force by 2010 (weeks away). The Nationalists who have done well have included parties such as the British National Party which has become avowedly Zionist - making British insofar as it supports the Establishment, and Nationalist in no way at all. The UK Independence Party is likewise controlled by the Internationalist Zionist Faction Two. Parties which genuinely oppose European Union, and World Union have failed to achieve any relevant representation in Britain, if not in all Europe. The Great White Hope Vaclav Klaus of the Czech Republic has likewise proven himself a tool of the elite by allowing all opposition focus on himself, preventing a media-hypnotised population from acting for themselves until too late - when he simply 'gave up' the fight at precisely the moment his masters willed.

There are people who are awake to the futility of the party system who seek alternative means to halt the march to the Global Gulag. The Establishment has an answer to such people - just as it neatly fits people into nonsensical divisions of left and right, then uses the people who accept these labels to attack each other, it uses the same people to attack those who won't take any labels. The left-right division is a Masonic creation. It keeps natural allies apart on superficial grounds. People who won't play the game are a bigger threat to the Establishment than those who take their places like good little pawns in the grand chess game.

In the British Isles we have many political movements. Those who take the Masonic label of being 'left-wing' attack anyone who takes the label 'right-wing' - sometimes verbally, sometimes physically. The same applies in the other direction. The Establishment create these divisions in order to prevent a viable opposition forming. Globalism reduces everyone to the position of materialistic slaves, regardless of nationality, race, religion, sex, or whatever. the common enemy is Globalism, and its drive to turn every town in every country into a faceless characterless, cultural vacuum. They are succeeding because people who oppose this spend more time fighting one another than fighting the Global menace.

An example of the futility of the Party game is the meandering of activists from one Party to another. In the Nationalist arena, we are witnessing the BNP becoming ever more internationalist and Zionist, with the members who oppose this moving to other parties, such as the National Front. This is really a pointless exercise. With the ratification of the Lisbon Treaty, parties such as the NF are redundant, and when the laws against Xenophobia are passed, they will be outlawed. All they serve to do is to contain the opposition by recycling activists from one group to another. The same applies to the 'Left'. The difference is that there is some unity amongst the 'Left' at least on the single issue of opposing Nationalists. That is about as far as the unity goes though.

Parties are not entirely pointless. They are reservoirs of activists, and as such, are home to people with a passion to put right the ills in society. Sadly this passion, rather than being nurtured, is stifled by the leadership. The priority of Party leaders is to win seats in elections. to do this, the policies must change to suit the media-driven political climate. This requires a succession of compromises, twists and turns, which will reduce any party to being a mirror image of the governing party it seeks to oust. Parties which retain ideological purity fail. Individuals within parties who refuse to adopt every policy change are removed. If the goal is to win elections at any cost, then yes, parties can do this. If the goal is to halt the Globalist Zionist destruction of our world, then by their very design, they must fail.

If political parties are such a waste of time, effort, and resources, then what can be done to halt our decline, and our enemies' advances? Of prime importance is to stop playing games we cannot win. The Party System is such a game. Winning elections does not produce power, elections are only won by those who have power - or to be more accurate by those who do the bidding of the real power which controls all elections. the only instances when the democratic process is worth joining is at the parish level. Parish Councils very often are undermanned, and all it takes to get on a council is to put your name forward. If you are unopposed, the seat is yours. Party affiliation will provoke interest and possibly opposition. standing as an independent individual avoids this - and allows the individual to speak freely.

What we must do is stop attacking one another. There are Police Informers and agents provocateur placed in all organisations. Whereas it is important to expose the shills, it is vital to not become paranoid and point the finger of accusation at anyone who has opinions which differ from one's own. Likewise the Left-Right nonsense must be dropped. There are good Nationalists who oppose internationalism due to love of their nation, not hatred of others; there are good Socialists who oppose materialism through an appreciation of the value of humanity over commerce; similarly many Anarchists take their opposition to Government from an awareness of the corruption inherent in the system, and the propensity of Government of any hue to oppress and manipulate the people. Refusing to cooperate with one another by compartmentalising our beliefs and the beliefs of others, is exactly what the Establishment need us to do. We do not have to agree on everything. Our common opposition to the Internationalist menace is reason enough to cooperate. The Zionist cabal is destroying the only world we have, and fighting amongst ourselves only helps them. United we are strong, divided, our efforts are pointless.

All that can be achieved by fighting for ideological purity is to ghettoise ourselves. We will achieve the purity we seek at the expense of losing any hope of protecting the ones we love from the Global Prison being built around us. Our children will have no future other than as slaves to materialism and cannon fodder for commerce. Whatever '-ism' we attach to ourselves, we will still be crushed under the heel of the Global Jackboot. Fighting silly street battles and Internet wars will do none of us any good. We need to unite if only to stop the completion of the Internationalist Empire. After that we may fight against one another again, if we still haven't learnt the value of understanding and appreciating our individual strength and worth.

In practical terms we must take the fight to where it matters - to everywhere we can. We must speak to everyone of every political hue. We must agitate on every forum, every social network, in every workplace, and every interaction. We are losing this fight because we are acting as players in a pantomime not or our making. We need to exit the stage and take over the reality beyond the theatre. And we need to do this now. 'Tomorrow' will be too late.

Honour the Victims of War - Punish the Perpetrators

0 comments Posted by VA at 03:00

The 11th November, marks Armistice Day - the day when the Great War (subsequently known as the First World War), formally ended. The exact timing chosen for the Armistice was 11 o'clock on the 11th day of the 11th Month (11/11, 11). Does it strike anyone as odd that a war could end in such a numerologically significant manner? How was this possible? Simply because that is how the end to the ritual slaughter of the Great War was planned.

The annual spectacle of Remembrance Day ostensibly commemorates the sacrifice of the men and women who died fighting for the survival of the British Empire in the War of 1914-18. Subsequent wars involving the British military (with the exception of the 1948 War in Palestine) have been added to the Great War, as a focus for contemplation. Alike to every almost officially sanctioned event, the truth behind the ceremony is very different to that which we are made to believe.

The Great War of 1914-18 was an exercise in imperialism. Great Britain and her Empire were not threatened in any manner by any foreign power. The men who rushed to enlist were victims of hysterical jingoist propaganda. As the war progressed, the much promised quick victory over continental Europe was exposed as a political lie. After it became impossible to continue to romanticise the murder by the State of Britain's idealistic young men, (who were marched into the bullets of a similarly brain-washed and coerced opposition army), conscription was introduced. Brave men who refused to be cannon fodder were murdered in cold blood by the establishment, whilst those who were forced under threat of execution to fight, were ritually butchered as agreed by the monsters of the Royal Family in London and Berlin.

The Great War was won in 1917 by Germany, which offered to restore the battered land of Europe to its pre-war status. However, the fully plutocratic establishment of Great Britain refused to accept this chivalrous offer and instead sought to extend the war by enticing the USA to join on Britain's side. To achieve this, the nation of Palestine was promised to International Zionism. The American media were mobilised to push stories of German barbarity to the American people in order to so enrage them that they would support the insanity of a foreign war for the benefit of no-one other than a self-chosen elite.

At the end of the Great War, the financial elite were given control over Palestine, and the countries which had stood in the way of International Finance were handed over to the same mafia who now had a foothold in the Middle East. The Christian nation of Russia, which formed the frontier between Europe and the non-White world, was handed over to asiatics with their ancestry rooted in Khazaria. The heroic Russians fought back against this alien take-over of their nation, but were defeated by the financial might of the Khazars in London and Washington who provided every possible assistance to ensure their brethren maintained control of the enslaved Russian Nation. Attempts to install similar regimes across Europe in order to completely destroy Christian Europe, by imposing Communist fronts in the Orthodox and Catholic nations, to match the Capitalist fronts in the Judaeo-Protestant lands they already controlled, had to be delayed. Interestingly, the Romanov dynasty which had resisted the advance of Zionism were ritually murdered, but the Hapsburgs who acted in concert with the Saxe-Coburg-Gothas to create the War in the first place, received no such treatment.

The Great War was labelled as the 'war to end all wars'. This was, of course, nonsense.

The failure of the Khazar elite to capture all of Europe necessitated another war. This was accomplished using the illegitimate Rothschild, Adolf Hitler, and Soviet plants in the NSDAP hierarchy such as Martin Bormann. Conning the German people with promises of restoring to the Reich the territories stolen from it by the Zionist victors, the patriotic German people were pushed into an unwanted war, from which all that was gained was the further dismemberment of the nation and the slaughter of all who had a healthy appreciation of the need for an undying defence of faith, folk and fatherland. Unbelievably, in Britain, Oswald Mosely ordered members of his British Union of Fascists to murder fellow Europeans at the demand of the Zionist London regime! By associating the opposition to Globalism with an opposition to all things Jewish, the Zionist elite (who are nearly entirely non-Semitic) managed to instill in the people of Europe a suicidal worldview which categorised as the natural desire for National Freedom and Social Justice as synonymous with the desire for anti-Semitic genocide. The fact that the Holyhoax was a barefaced lie thought up by the diseased minds of Zionist Washington, Moscow and London, in no way weakened this Pavlovian linkage of thought, which has become the death-wish of Europe worldwide.

Alike to the false promise of the Great War that it would be a war to end all wars, the Second World War was sold to the people as a war to liberate Poland (which itself immorally occupied land alien to it). Poland remained subject to the control of the Khazar USSR for nearly half a century before experiencing a brief period of freedom, followed by absorption into the Khazar EU. Former Polish territory is still administered by other nations. The Second World War strengthened by Zionist move to Globalism and all who died, like those who died in the Great War, died in vain.

Since 1945, the British military have been involved in wars across the world. In many they have been publicly humiliated as the Empire has collapsed to the point that aside from a few rocks scattered across the globe, the British nation has been reduced to the British Isles alone (and not even to all of them). The same elite control the interests which were formally known as the Empire, but they operate behind the scenes rather than overtly. Now, Britain herself has been absorbed by the European Union, and the age old dream of the Khazars to occupy all of Europe has been realised. Khazars control every nation of the EU, Eurasia, North America, and elsewhere. This is what the wars of the Twentieth Century achieved.

Now, in the early Twentyfirst Century, we have the lie of the War on Terror. TV-viewing retards have been convinced that for the first time ever (and not since) steel-framed buildings have collapsed to dust due to fire (I wish I was joking, but this is the fable), and that a tiny group of Muslim extremists are responsible. Those who know this is absurd are herded by the likes of Alex Jones into believing that '9/11 was an inside job' - safely venting their anger at political puppets who serve the real Zionist culprits who control the establishments of the EU, USA, etc. This has led to the ongoing wars in Africa, the Middle East and Central Asia, in which British, American and allied servicemen are murdering civilians on an industrial scale. In Iraq alone the death-toll is approaching two million - people murdered in their own countries for the crime of living in territory with resources, artifacts, and strategic importance coveted by the Globalists.

In Afghanistan, the British and American military are guarding the poppy fields to ensure that our streets are awash with the poison of Heroin, which destroys individuals, families, and entire communities. These same soldiers are treated as heroes when they parade in British and American towns. How are they heroes? What is heroic about murdering people in their homes, enforcing food and medicine embargoes to kill civilians (especially babies) with malnutrition and disease, and with helping the establishment to produce drugs which are wrecking the home nations? The heroes are the men and women of the (Afghani and Iraqi) Resistance who are fighting to remove the forces of occupation from their lands. These people are labelled by the Zionist media lie machine as Terrorists.

On Remembrance Day we must remember the victims of war - the civilians butchered in Iraq, Afghanistan, Somalia, Palestine, Hiroshima, Nagasaki, Dresden, Hamburg, and too many other places; the soldiers who naively volunteered to enlist in the military in wars which served no national interest, and which in fact invited attack by people reacting to the actions of soldiers in uniforms bearing our flags; the conscripts who fought against their will, the conscientious objectors and deserters who were murdered for doing the right thing and refusing to fight for the Khazar elite. We must also remember those responsible for war - the Zionist-Plutocratic-Masonic-Royal Establishment; the psychopathic volunteers who enjoy killing for money; the politicians and media who push the lie that we must 'support our troops' in these insane and criminal campaigns.

The Armed Forces should exist for the sole purpose of defending the Nation from all who threaten it - be they financial parasites, Monarchists, Sabbatean Cultists, unassimiable immigrants or those who advocate imperialism and atrocities on our own or foreign shores. The most fitting tribute to the victims of war is to campaign for the military to be brought home, and for the war criminals in or out of uniform to be executed. Never again must our military be reduced to the role of paid butchers in service of our real enemies. The role of the military should be to defend the nation from enemies domestic and foreign who threaten our homeland - nothing else. National Freedom and Imperialism cannot coexist. No more wars for Zionist Profit and Empire.

Tuesday, 10 November 2009

If Hasan Were White

0 comments Posted by VA at 21:41

Contrast this...

Obama: Hasan May Have ‘Cracked’ From ‘Stress’ | The FOX Nation

On Fort Hood shooting, Obama says: Do not jump to conclusions | Jerusalem Post

with this...

Round Up Hate-Promoters Now, Before Any More Holocaust Museum Attacks - CBS News, by Bonnie Erbe.

The Big Hate - NYTimes.com, by Paul Krugman.

- - -

If Major Nidal Malik Hasan were White these people wouldn't hesitate to recognize and denounce his motives. Likewise if James von Brunn had been a palestinian muslim. The one constant is that when jews perceive a threat to jewish interests, the conclusions they jump to get aired, no matter how insane, illiberal, or insensitive, and usually without any challenge or retraction. When there is no direct threat to jewish interests, as with the Fort Hood attack, then defending against indirect threats to minority privilege (the presumption that non-Whites, including jews, are disadvantaged) and dual loyalty (it's ok to be a jew or muslim first) is paramount.

There is no need to jump to conclusions about the anti-White regime. Pay attention to its reaction to any particular clash of White and non-White interests and the conclusions jump out all by themselves.

Thursday, 5 November 2009

Remember, remember, the 5th of November

0 comments Posted by VA at 00:00

Today in England is the festival known as Bonfire Night. This festival involves the usual English traditional celebrations such as eating junk and drinking too much, but unlike other festivals it has not degenerated into a big shopping bonanza. Instead, it continues in much the same way as it has for centuries, with processions of people in historic garb, solemnly taking the effigy of Guy Fawkes through the streets to the steady beat of the drum, finally arriving at a bonfire, upon which it is placed and set alight. This is followed by a fireworks display.

Guy Fawkes hailed from Yorkshire - the historic county of Northern England which was also home to the much loved Robin Hood. Alike to Robin Hood, Guy Fawkes was a revolutionary who sought to help the people of England by combating the anti-Christian despots who had usurped power from the indigenous population. Unlike Robin Hood, the truth of whom is shrouded in mystery and folklore, Fawkes is well documented. He heroically fought against the despicable Stadholders in the Spanish Netherlands in an attempt to liberate the people from the tyranny of Protestantism. It was in the Netherlands that Fawkes became an expert in the use of explosives - an expertise which made him a key part in the Gunpowder Plot of 1605.

In 1605 England was ruled by King James I. This was the monarch responsible for the blasphemous King James Bible in which it is stated that Kings rule by Divine Right. This Bible has become the most widely used Protestant Bible and is so far removed from the real Christian texts that it sits better alongside the Talmud than it does the teachings of Christ. In 1604, King James attacked the Catholics of England in such strong terms that it became certain that the persecution of Christians by the Protestant heretics would be increased beyond any tolerable limits. This fear would prove to be prophetic as within the century came the rule of Oliver Cromwell - the most evil man to rule England since William the Bastard.

Driven to desperate measures, the Gunpowder Plotters led by Robert Catesby set out to bomb the Palace of Westminster during the State Opening of Parliament whilst the hated King James and his diabolical family were present, alongside the Members of Parliament, the Nobility, the Aristocracy and the entire leadership of the Anglican-Satanic Cult. Had the Plot been successful, England would have been freed from the nightmare it had endured since Elizabethan times, and could have returned to its true path as a beacon for Christianity and a bulwark against the power of Judaic-usury. Sadly, well-meaning plotters informed their friends in Parliament of the need to keep away from the building on that fateful day - and these lackeys of the establishment betrayed them to the Monarch's Secret Police. The result was the arrest of the Plotters and the continuation of the anti-Christ rule over England.

To his eternal credit, even though Guy Fawkes suffered the most unimaginable tortures, this true hero refused to name any of his co-conspirators, save only the ones he knew were already dead. Sentenced to be 'Hung, Drawn and Quartered', Fawkes cheated the sick and depraved blood lust of the Monarchy by hurling himself from the hangman's scaffold, breaking his neck - thus depriving the enemies of humanity from ripping him apart whilst still alive.

Guy Fawkes will forever be remembered as the man who attempted to destroy the rule of King James and those around him who we would now call Zionists. To quote the popular rhyme :

"Remember, remember, the Fifth of November,
Gunpowder, (t)reason and plot,
I see no reason why gunpowder treason,
Should ever be forgot."

Well said. Let us forever remember this honourable gentleman and his comrades who fought to save us from those he foresaw would enslave us all.

Guido Fawkes - Presente!

Monday, 2 November 2009

Double Speak in action

0 comments Posted by VA at 03:54

Political Correctness was designed in the Soviet Union to control how people express themselves, and by extension, how they think. The theory is quite simple - control what words people are allowed to use, manipulate the meanings attached to individual terms, and by so doing, limit the possible linguistic expression available, thus preventing dissent by removing the ability of the individual to put into words any feelings of opposition to the establishment agenda. By controlling language, the theory maintains that the ability to think in a manner which is dangerous to the ruling regime, will become impossible, and thus opposition in any tangible form will become impossible.

This is, of course, complete nonsense! People do not think with words, but with images (consider your memories - they are like films inside your head and not akin to the words in a book). However, the politically correct mafia have such faith in their ideology that they undertake their assault on language with the zeal of unbridled fanaticism. They are damaging our language, and in fact every language which has come under their scrutiny. With regards to English in particular, they are so distorting the meaning of words as to make the language barely intelligible to those who are not fully cognisant of the language as it should be used. Whether it is the niggling use of the word 'they' (plural) in place of he or she (singular), or the use of 'she' to refer to a man who has a mental illness and has had himself castrated in the bizarre belief that by having no penis he will magically become a woman, (rather than a mutilated man, which is what he is), the English language in its every day use is becoming absurd. Foreigners trying to learn English must find this corruption of the language confusing and irritating.

A serious result of the politicisation of the language is the perceived danger of being ridiculed for having opinions which are out of fashion (i.e. forbidden by the media manipulators), or being unpopular and seen as an elitist for using English in a manner which doesn't pander to the lowest common denominator. It has become a badge of honour to speak and act in the way of a mental retard. Using words of more than one syllable invites reactions such as "what's up wiv you mate, dya swallow a dickshunairee?" suggesting that it is a bad thing to seek self-improvement through the acquisition of knowledge and the ability to effectively communicate using the vocabulary suited to an adult level. This, of course, is the whole point of political correctness - to 'dumb down' the population to the point where they are barely human and are thus more easily controlled, like the cattle they have become.

It is routine for the commissars of political correctness to claim that not only does political correctness not exist(!), but if it did, it would be a benevolent phenomenon, which only 'haters' and bigots could object to. By this simple ploy, all criticism of the manipulation of society is silenced - well, that is the idea at any rate. Anyone who is not totally submersed in the propaganda system which passes for the news and entertainment media cannot fail to see that the way ideas and events are presented is highly controlled, and nothing at all is left to chance which the media manipulators can control.

The English language, like all living languages, goes through changes, with some words reversing their meanings over and over. With regards to everyday words which have no real cultural value, this is of little importance. The natural development of the language contrasts with the PC agenda in that it is orchestrated by the establishment and pushed at every level. The only comparable example, (in times other than those of conquest), of the high level distortion of English in our past is that of the Elizabethan era, in which the Freemasonic Francis Bacon created a whole array of new words, to knit together the various dialects of England into a unified national language. At the time, 'English' spoken in the North was as different from that of the South as Plat Deutsch is to Bairisch for our Anglo-Saxon brethren in Germany in our day. Defenders of the English State will argue that Bacon's deeds helped forge a national culture, in place of the regional cultures which preceded it. Whether one considers this a good or bad thing is an issue in itself. Personally, I find abhorrent the destruction of our indigenous organic cultures in the service of the imperialism of the ruling elite, but in Bacon's defence, the vocabulary of the enhanced language was greatly increased. Try as one may, it is impossible to find any positive consequences of the modern Political Correctness sickness.

The distortion of words is important insofar as words connected with our culture and heritage when lost amount to a break with our ancestors. The old systems of measurements for example, are being lost in order to create a single global system. This would not be a problem but for the fact that the traditional units of measurement link us with the past and help us understand the truth of our world, not the lies given us by court historians. For example, the English Mile is an exact division of the measurement of the circumference of the planet. It was created after the Earth was measured, proving that our ancestors were not savages, but were in fact highly intelligent and technologically advanced. The Politically Correct lie of Evolution maintains that humans came from monkeys, who in turn came from primordial slime, which came out of the big bang when gases just happened to explode (although where these gases came from isn't explained). The demise of the English Mile removes the link to the ancient measuring system which proves that our forebears were not apes, but people - like us, nay better than us. The Materialist-Darwinist lie of Evolution is a key point of the PC argument. They claim we are all 'the same' and 'equal' and they justify this with the ludicrous theory of evolution, which is taught in schools as fact. The theory is so full of holes as to be nonsensical. Giving us the culturally and historically neutral Kilometre in place of the ancient Mile adds validity to their theory by removing evidence from human knowledge which proves that advanced civilisations were in place at least 100,000 years ago, when the Darwinist-Communist-PC liars would have us living in trees and eating bananas.

Alongside the twisting of words and the attack on basic grammar used by the PC mafia, is the assault on intelligence, with the focus upon trivia as a new source of wisdom. Turn on the TV or Radio or read a 'Newspaper' and you will be bombarded with stories of which 'celebrity' is having sex with which 'sports star', or some other such nonsense. People shout and scream like inmates of a lunatic asylum at contestants on game shows, and is if that isn't bad enough, they congratulate one another and take pride in the fact that they have learnt every tiny piece of irrelevant information that the mass media have chosen to spoon feed them. Never mind that they are sleep-walking slaves trapped in an economic system which could destroy their lives in an instant, no, they can repeat the tedious details which they have swallowed form years of obediently devouring what their masters have provided for them in the circus of TV living. This 'pride' should be a sense of pride for the establishment as it indicates just how successful they have become at controlling the masses.

The 'news' media is full of propaganda in support of the criminal wars of aggression being fought by the unthinking robots who are labelled as soldiers, on behalf of the globalist elite. There are decent soldiers who are refusing to fight and are quitting the Armed Forces in disgust at being used not to protect their nations, but to destroy obstacles to the Global Superstate which is step-by-step absorbing ALL nations. These men and women who refuse to serve are the true heroes, not the scum who blindly obey orders and murder civilians of all ages and foreign soldiers and members of the Resistance protecting their own people in their own lands. Ask any flag-waving drooling TV viewer what is going on in the world, and the reaction will be a repetition of whatever that dumbed-down individual has been exposed to. Even those who can see that politicians lie will still parrot support for 'our boys' - stating that we have to support the troops even though they are butchering the people of foreign lands and paving the way for their international counterparts to do the same to us, right here. Sickeningly, people cheer in the streets when these paid psychopaths march in the streets freshly returned from their tours of occupied lands, their flesh only recently scrubbed clean of the blood of the innocents they have hacked to pieces for the Global leadership. Such is the power of the media to make otherwise intelligent people speak and act as morons.

The greatest victory of the pushers of the Political Correctness machine is that people see the ridiculous examples of men in frocks being called women, or men 'marrying' men, or quota systems giving work to people unsuited to particular jobs solely because they fit a stereotype which the PC mafia maintain doesn't matter! By seeing the ludicrous and pointless, people focus upon the irrelevant, and fight against side-issues. This keeps attention away from the bigger picture and allows the Globalists to advance their agenda unhindered. The likes of Common Purpose are seen as liberal extremists and political crackpots, precisely because the real power behind them want them to be seen as such. They are puppets in a pantomime show and we have been directed to watch them, whilst all the while our hidden masters are sending their agents amongst us to pilfer from our pockets and steal us of our heritage, our present, and our future.