Beullogeo's

Fashion is a word which seems inoccuos enough. At face value, the manipulation of the vanity of people who are so vacuous as to seriously believe that how they look is the be-all and end-all of their existence, seems to be a sad indictment of the self-obsession of the individuals in question. However, the curse of fashion should not be so readily dismissed. Fashion goes beyond clothing, hairstyles, and other such material matters, and is indeed a problem which must be addressed by anyone who has the desire to understand how our oppressors control the societies we live in, and who wish to use this knowledge to undermine this control and free us all from this menace.

When we think of fashion, we tend to think only in terms of physical appearance. From the ridiculous flared trousers of the 1960s to the revolting tracksuits tucked into socks of the 2000's, it is easy to regard fashion as comical - but is it? Is it really a source of amusement that chronologically adult people dress themselves in the manner of circus performers at the command of an industry which revels in the ability to make allegedly sensible people reduce themselves to figures of ridicule - and to put themselves into debt in order to do so?

The phenomenon of fashion is worthy of study as it is clearly displays the strategy of our rulers in containing all the options available to the manipulated populace. For example, the mainstream fashion for girls may consist of the 'cheer-leader' or slutty look, with the fashion for those who reject the mainstream being the 'goth' or dyke look. Those who have the intelligence to see through the manipulation of the overt media are neatly herded into the camp of those who refuse to buy the designer label and TV-endorsed look. Far from expressing their individuality and freedom from the manipulators, they reveal that they too are falling in line with the mind controllers. Dressing in black and spiking one's hair may cause a reaction of indignation which serves to satisfy the desire to feel as if one is in rebellion against the system, but it is a completely controlled rebellion - ie no rebellion at all. When the punk group Crass stated that Punk was dead, they were referring to this manipulation - sadly the devotees of Crass, Conflict etc who confine their rebellion to clothing, music and repeating lyrics which they haven't bothered to examine, have fallen into the trap of becoming a part of the controlled opposition.

Fashion in music is an interesting arena. Unless one lives on a remote mountain top, with no radio or television, and no need to visit what passes for civilisation, one cannot escape exposure to what the establishment laughingly class as music. Nearly every shop, pub, cafe etc pumps out the music of the establishment. Whether it is the sexually explicit boy band and girl band material, or it is the controlled anger of the tailor-made false rebels, there is almost no break from the relentless aural assault on the senses of the passive listener.

What does it matter that the people have bread and circuses to keep them occupied? What else would the masses do if they didn't have their sensory pleasures catered for? Perhaps, just perhaps, they would begin to think for themselves and to see the world for how it really is, and not for how they have been conditioned to see it. What does is matter that pop culture is manufactured and all pervasive? Well, it matters precisely because it is all pervasive.

Pop music is targeted at children. Why? They are not economically independent, so the motive goes beyond material greed. Sexually explicit lyrics and calls to reject the authority of parents are not in the majority of songs played on the radio by mere chance. These lyrics are placed in the public realm deliberately. It is a much researched fact that repetition is a key method of brainwashing. Radio stations have a limited number of songs which they play over and over. The result is to place in the mind of the listener an attitude which is beneficial to the establishment. The ruling powers need to atomise society to the point where there are no familial ties and there is no respect between individuals and generations. What better way to destroy the natural order of a healthy society than to implant in the minds of its youth the idea that (as Mrs Thatcher stated in the 1980s) 'there is no society, only the individual'? Children sing about the primacy of the individual, the importance of being popular, about hatred of family, about love being an illusion, about meaningless anonymous sex with every man, woman, and animal being a positive thing. This self-brainwashing then transfers into reality - destroying the family, spreading selfishness and perversion, and giving authority to the establishment to the detriment of wholesome and natural structures.

Fashion goes beyond the material into every aspect of life. Religion for example has been subjected to the ceaseless assault of the politically motivated doyens of anti-morality. Before Vatican II, even Anglicans looked to homosexuality and abortion as examples of spiritual decay. Now the Anglican 'church' has openly homosexual priests, and has quietly dropped the last of the Christian principles it once held. Anglicanism has always been a heretical cult which has been a front for anti-Christian beliefs, so to see the facade drop is not that surprising. However the Holy Roman Church has mirrored its Anglican counterpart by embracing all manner of apostasy in order to appear 'with it' and fashionable. Only a few years ago one could expect to be given Hail Marys and Our Fathers to recite as penance for confessed sins, but that now has been dropped by the modernisers - it seems even God must conform to the whims of the dictators of fashion.

In politics, traditionalism and respect for country is laughed at - except when the establishment require patriotism to bolster their homicidal wars of aggression. This cynical manipulation of the feelings of the public is gently pushed by the 'news' media, who select which stories to tell to the public, and in reality create the news. At present it is fashionable to be pro-war, to 'support the troops' (the images of British soldiers murdering defenceless civilian in criminally occupied lands children and babies are hidden from the public gaze) and to love US President Obama (whose subservience to the globalist agenda and betrayal of the USA, perversion, drug addiction and blood lust never gets mentioned). Only a few years ago, flying the Union Jack in England was classed as racist - now failing to do so is unpatriotic. - so easily are the people swayed by the fear of being 'different' and out of step. In truth the Union Jack is an imperialist rag which when one understands its significance as a symbol of the Monarchy and their Zionist criminal brethren, deserves only to be burned whenever one comes across it.