Beullogeo's

Possible Obama Supreme Court Pick Slapped Down Reverse Discrimination Case in One-Paragraph Opinion:

U.S. Appeals Court Judge Sonia Sotomayor, mentioned as a possible Supreme Court nominee, voted to deny a racial discrimination claim in a 2008 decision. She dismissed the case in a one-paragraph statement that, in the opinion of one dissenting judge, ignored the evidence and did not even address the constitutional issues raised by the case.

The case, Ricci v. DeStefano, involved a group of 19 white firefighters and one Hispanic firefighter who filed suit in 2003 claiming that the city of New Haven, Conn., engaged in racial discrimination when it threw out the results of two promotion tests because none of the city’s black applicants had passed the tests.

Each of the plaintiffs had passed the exam. The case is currently before the U.S. Supreme Court.

The city threw out the results because it feared potential lawsuits from activist groups if few or no minority candidates were promoted. The city also claimed that in addition to potential lawsuits, promotions based on the test results would undermine their goal of diversity in the Fire Department.

The firefighters sued, arguing that New Haven was discriminating against them by deciding that the tests would promote too many white candidates and too few minorities.

Federal Judge Janet Bond Arterton rejected the firefighters’ appeal, siding with the city and saying that no racial discrimination had occurred because the city didn’t promote anyone at all.

U.S. Appeals Court Judge Sotomayor issued an order that affirmed Arterton’s decision, issuing a one-paragraph judgment that called Arterton’s ruling “thorough, thoughtful, and well reasoned,”

Steve Sailer wrote about Ricci in Playing With Fire: The Obama Administration Backs Anti-White Discrimination in Ricci.

Sotomayor’s View of Judging Is on the Record from the New York Times, 14 May 2009:

"I would hope that a wise Latina woman with the richness of her experiences would more often than not reach a better conclusion than a white male who hasn’t lived that life," said Judge Sotomayor

Note that if the ethnies were reversed and this came from a White mouth anti-Whites wouldn't hesitate to identify such an opinion as "racist" "anti-latino" "White supremacism". They would not only exclude such a White from consideration for SCOTUS, they would agitate to terminate whatever current employment the White enjoyed.

The penalty for Sotomayor? Nothing. It might even be a reason she got nominated. But the NYT thinks it "could provoke sharp questioning in a confirmation hearing".

How -- and why -- Barack Obama picked Sonia Sotomayor for Supreme Court at politico.com, today:

An Obama aide said the president, who interviewed her for an hour in the Oval Office, “was blown away by her — her personal story, her sharp intellect and confidence, and her experience as prosecutor, trial judge, litigator and appellate judge.”

As the most arguably liberal of the four finalists, Sotomayor provides the most fodder for conservative groups, which have vowed to spend millions of dollars on television advertising. Leaders hope a court brawl will help rebuild their movement.

Via Elena Kagan: Free Speech Denier comes The Case Against Sotomayor by Jeffrey Rosen, 4 May 2009:

The most consistent concern was that Sotomayor, although an able lawyer, was "not that smart and kind of a bully on the bench," as one former Second Circuit clerk for another judge put it. "She has an inflated opinion of herself, and is domineering during oral arguments, but her questions aren't penetrating and don't get to the heart of the issue."

UPDATE 26 May 2009: In Sotomayor hates white people and Sotomayor hates white people, pt. 2 James Edwards covers the same subject. He concludes:

Get ready, white folks. Obama is making it as clear as he can that it’s payback time for honkies. You know how he said he wants judges who have “empathy” to be on the Supreme Court? Well, “empathy” means hatred for white people, just like “equality” and “diversity” do.

Anti-Whites call euphemisms like these "dog whistles" - though as the Wiki page describes, they think this cynical label only applies to phenomena that confirm their own one-sided view of "racism".

There is no moral equivalence between the appeal to the popular, instinctive desires of White voters that these anti-White anti-racists so detest, and the dishonest euphemisms they themselves so cherish and pretend are popular due to repetition ad nauseum by a like-minded anti-White press. But the comparison does support Edwards' blunt observation. If the "dog whistle" people think popular sympathies for state's rights or against immigration reflect White "racism", then by their own reasoning it's safe for us to conclude that their orwellian celebration of "empathy", "equality" and "diversity" means "I hate Whites".

UPDATE 27 May 2009: From the WSJ, dated 28 (sic) May 2009, Battle Over Sotomayor Heats Up:

Conservatives are focusing on a speech Ms. Sotomayor delivered at the University of California at Berkeley law school, where she said, "I would hope that a wise Latina woman with the richness of her experiences would more often than not reach a better conclusion than a white male who hasn't lived that life."

"Imagine a judicial nominee said 'my experience as a white man makes me better than a Latina woman.' Wouldn't they have to withdraw?" asked former House Speaker Newt Gingrich on his Web site. "New racism is no better than old racism."

White House aides said the comment was being taken out of context, and predicted it wouldn't put the nomination off course. Indeed, the White House believes the president is operating from a position of strength, and officials emphasized that a pitched confirmation fight isn't inevitable.

"We're all extremely pleased at how the first 24 hours went," said Sen. Charles Schumer (D., N.Y.), who has been assigned to chaperone the Bronx-born judge through her confirmation.

"We wanted to make sure we showed the broad support she has in the community," said Mr. Wilkes [executive director of the League of United Latin American Citizens], whose group has 115,000 members.

Ms. Sotomayor's critics are fighting an uphill battle, unless some unknown personal scandal emerges, because Democrats control the Senate.

Heat? Scandal? Where? She's anti-White and that's "extremely pleasing". The nomination is "right on course".

What in the world could sink her? A quip about pubic hair? Plagiarism? Unpaid taxes? Not paying an undocumented migrant ladeeenyo employee's social security? Starring on Celebrity Apprentice, killing a less wise White competitor with less rich experiences and eating his still beating heart, in prime time? Please. Can anybody imagine anything that might cause Obama or Schumer or Sotomayor herself to withdraw this "historic" nomination?

Good Afternoon.

Readers of this blog will know from the title (News from Atlantis), that although I write about empirical matters, my focus is not solely on the present and near past/future. Indeed, I do not accept the official linear view of history, but look to the study of the entire timescape essential for understanding where we are, where we have come from, and where we are going. Focusing on the here and now, and trusting in official history is a recipe for disaster.

It is with interest that I approach the assertions of my friend and Chess opponent, Eddy Morrison, that the theories which abound on the 'fringe' of the politically active, should be subservient to the Party approach. Eddy writes in his posting (http://britnationalist.blogspot.com/2009/05/pseudoscience-and-fringes-of-white.html) that Astrotheology, Hollow Earth Theory, Atlantis, the power of Ley Lines, and other areas which have been retained as Occult knowledge by the Secret Societies, are matters which should be confined to personal study, and areas which have no impact upon the real world.

I would like to point out an undeniable fact - the people who really take the hidden knowledge seriously and guard it with their very lives, are the people who have real power in this world. The study of mythology is a key to understanding forgotten and suppressed history. The perfect alignment of monuments such as the Pyramids, Stonehenge etc with the signs of the Zodiac, and the perfection of the Mayan Calendar, cannot be coincidental, and certainly not the product of inferior societies.

The proof of the existence of the Global Civilisation which Plato recorded as Atlantis, is scattered across the whole Earth. The underwater Pyramids near Japan, for example, must have been built in the antediluvian era. The presence of glass in the middle east which was created by an atomic blast in pre-official historical times points to the probability of a nuclear conflict which devastated the Old World Order. We are still recovering from this calamity.

Official history in the current era is replete with propaganda frauds, such as the Gulf of Tonkin Incident, The 11th September 2001 atrocity in New York City, the '7/7' London bombings, the death of Princess Diana, the Holocaust, to name but a few. If it is plausible to accept that we are being lied to about issues which have occurred within living memory for many people, then why then is it so hard to imagine that events which occurred millenia ago are being kept hidden from us, and distorted by those who stand to gain politically and materially by so doing?

There are many people who are now awakening to the phenomenon of political Zionism. Not long ago they would have viewed any discussion of the 'Jewish' (for want of a better term) domination of the international financial system, as 'racism', 'anti-Semitism' and the like. Now they can see that those who are in charge of the banking cartels are linked by familial ties. Zionism is but one facet of the move towards a new Global Superstate built on serfdom and oppression. It is no longer solely in the fringe realms where Zionism is discussed.

The opposition to the lie of Global Warming and the use of the new Religion of Earth Worship is slowly gathering amongst those who are considered the 'fringe' of politics, environmentalism, religion, economics etc. The seriousness of the stampede to Global Governance is such that unless the 'mainstream' disseminate the information the 'fringe' present them, then we will all be subjected to the Global Tyranny our would be masters have in store for us.

Searching for the truth is vital, lest we be pushed along a path of false resistance which has been carefully crafted for us. For example, the 'Jews' who control the banking system are not what we anti-Semites would have us believe. Thus being anti-Jewish will not affect the Zionist bankers in any palpable way. Understanding who controls the Zionists and those behind them, is the key to escaping the trap the real rulers have set for us.

The whole area of metahistory, astrotheology, sidereal cosmology et al is so deep that it cannot be grasped other than by attaining knowledge in stages, absorbing it and moving forward. This is how the Secret Societies have held on to and used much of the Occult knowledge of pre-history. Those who seriously wish to understand the fabric of reality need to pass through stages of initiation into real knowledge. To use an analogy, every great Chef must begin his/her culinary adventure by first boiling an egg. Exposing the uninitiated to the highest level of cooking would be to overwhelm the would be catering artisan. Of course, knowledge of the essence of reality goes beyond cooking!

The 'fringe' must be separate from the mass movement as the latter cannot hope to comprehend the undistilled ideas of the former, and the former hasn't the manpower to put those ideas into practice to effect vital change. Organisations such as the Freemasons know this, which is why they are so successful. More to the point, those behind these visible front groups understand this. Attempting to deal with the guiding force in the world we live in by fighting shadows is pointless and counterproductive. Party Politics are exactly such a diversion, and will remain as worse than useless if those who participate continue struggling against the web which has been so skillfully crafted to enmesh them.

Have a look at the above picture. Is this one of Barack Hussein Obama’s campaign posters? Maybe it belongs to Bill Clinton, who also pledged to bring about Change when standing for election. No, this image belongs not to an American shyster, but to a British one.

David Cameron is using the ‘Change’ slogans so beloved of fellow Zionists to hoodwink the British people into believing he is going to overturn the harm wrought by the Blair-Brown labour regime. This exactly apes the Obama campaign, which promised to undue the harm committed by the hated Bush Republican administration.

So will Cameron buck the trend and actually save the electorate from the despotic policies formulated by the incumbent order? Taking a look at the man behind the Tony Blairesque smile, one would think perhaps not.

David Cameron is as establishment as he possibly could be. He was educated at the elite training barracks, which goes by the name of Eton Public School. This innocuous sounding name is a barefaced lie. A School it may be, but it is in no way accessible to the general public, but is in fact a preserve of the super-rich, and an establishment for moulding the figureheads of the establishment.

After leaving Eton, Cameron went on to study at the elitist Oxford University, which is heavily connected to the Rhodes Group and has alongside its twin, Cambridge, has long been a finishing school for enemies of the nation who pass into Free Masonry, to further serve the internationalist agenda.

David Cameron is establishment even in blood. Cameron is a direct descendent of William IV, and his wife is of aristocratic stock, thus ensuring his children share the establishment lineage. This in itself is interesting, but of more obvious concern is his business history. Cameron’s family have been financiers for generations. His Great Great Grandfather worked for that most democratically minded family – the Rothschilds. Cameron has been immersed in the propaganda tool known as Public Relations, which is used by politicians and the financial establishment for conning people into buying products they do not need. That really doesn’t bode well for Great Britain.

The British public are heartily sick of the Police Sate being built around them. Cameron is being pushed by the controlled media as the alternative to Gordon Brown. As Obama was presented as Saviour for the USA, so Cameron is the darling of the establishment in Great Britain. He is an insider who is related to the very people who have destroyed the nation. He is a servant of the financial elite. His party is falling over itself to be the most Politically Correct party in the country. He has taken every opportunity to promote homosexuality, excuse drug taking, be cuddly to immigrants, be touchy feely on Islam, be subservient to Zionism, and promote the interests of the banking industry and international order.

How exactly can this doyen of the ruling plutocracy be the instrument of Change, when he is so deeply rooted in the establishment, professionally and biologically? In the USA, the Obama administration has accelerated the programme of the Bush administration. The only ‘Change’ has been that the Fabian crawl to Global Governance and the ‘New World Order’ has become a headlong rush at breakneck speed.

Change, Real Change, can only come by rejecting the old order and all its poisoned strategies. The New World Order is simply the realisation of the Old Order. Freedom will always remain an elusive dream so long as people play the Party game. True Change comes from within – by a complete rejection of the politicians, royals, spin-doctors, materialists and Public Relations clowns.

Cameron or Brown? It makes no difference who is the puppet in Parliament, all we can look forward to is more of the same veiled tyranny. They Win – We Lose. The only way to fight them is to refuse to play the game at all.

Czech President Vaclav Klaus has stood firm in his support of freedom. The criminal clique who control the European Union have bribed, blackmailed and otherwise manipulated enough members of the Czech Senate to procure a 54-20 vote in favour of ratification of the European Constitution, which is being presented under the alias of the Lisbon treaty.

Vaclav Klaus stated that "The Lisbon Treaty is dead for this moment. It is dead because it was rejected in a referendum in one member state. Therefore, a decision on ratification of this treaty is not on the agenda at this point."

President Klaus defended the democratic decision of the people of Ireland who rejected the Constitution in a referendum last year. This rejection means that the Constitution/Treaty is legally void. In spite of this, the puppet regime in Dublin has plans for a new vote to ratify the Treaty in Ireland. Had the referendum gone in the EU's favour, you can guarantee that a further referendum to overturn the adoption would not have been allowed. Such is the state of democracy in Erin.

Vaclac Klaus and his Civic Democrat Party are true European Heroes. The Czech Republic suffered under the heel of Communism. President Klaus is making a bold stand to protect his nation from the Communitarian menace which threatens us all.

It would come as no surprise if President Klaus were to suddenly become ill. He is the voice of freedom against the New Soviet tyranny. Hopefully the people of Ireland will again reject the evil machinations of the Rothschild controlled Bruxelles-Strasburg cabal, and Vaclav Klaus will not succumb to the criminality of the EU kommisariat.

Long live Vaclac Klaus. Long live the Czech Republic, Ireland and all free Europe.

In addition to reporting and opining on the latest developments in the ATCGs of human differences, n/a at race/history/evolution notes has a gift for finding and exposing historical evidence of the long struggle between race-realists and race-deniers.

Quoting Jonathan P. Spiro in Grant vs. Boas:

These students of Boas set about devising the intellectual weapons and amassing the ethnographic data they would need to combat the disciples of Grant. And while on a theoretical level the debate between the Grantians and the Boasians pitted the defenders of heredity and biological determinism against the proponents of environment and the primacy of culture, it was difficult not to notice that it was at heart a confrontation between the ethos of native Protestants and the Zeitgeist of immigrant Jews.

Quoting Gelya Frank in Boasianism as a cult:

THERE HAS ALWAYS BEEN a lively, if sometimes hushed, in-house discourse about American anthropology's Jewish origins and their meaning. The preponderance of Jewish intellectuals in the early years of Boasian anthropology and the Jewish identities of anthropologists in subsequent generations have been downplayed in standard histories of the discipline.

There has also been a whitewashing of Jewish ethnicity, reflecting fears of anti-Semitic reactions that could discredit the disci- pline of anthropology and individual anthropologists

Now I'm shocked, shocked to discover that jews, especially supposed professionals dedicated foremost to the study of man's tribalism, could so whitewash the full extent of their own tribe's dominance of that field until so long after the fact. Doubly shocking is the excuse, which is of course that "the anti-semites" made them do it.

Actually I'm well beyond shock, as the more I've examined the subject the more commonplace and even banal such revelations have become. Today, looking back at what transpired in the hundred years or so since the Grant/Boas struggle, I'm compelled to make two points:

1) The Boasians, prevailing as they did, have produced as a consequence a social and academic environment which is anti-racist only in name. The regime is in fact as race-based as ever, the discrimination has only been reversed. Today it is perfectly acceptable to be anti-White, and horribly taboo if not illegal to be "anti-semitic".

2) Those who opposed the Boasians, to the extent they saw and objected to the self-serving jewish agenda and feared for the future of their posterity, were correct. And if it's proper to label them and those of us who continue to struggle "anti-semites", then it's only fair to recognize that our opponents were and still are anti-White. It conforms to their own name-calling standards and, more important, accurately reflects the empirical results of their words and actions.

The image above is from Race: Reality and Denial by Richard McCulloch.