|
|---|
Thursday, 17 July 2008
Everybody with any grip on reality who has the desire to live how he/she wants, rejects the New World Order. To this end, from the diverse range of activists, there is a unity of purpose - to regain freedom. However, that is as far as the wider unity goes.
Everyone has a different set of priorities and a unique idea as to how to combat the New World Order. We all differ in how we see our ideal future world. Some people have religious/spiritual convictions, some people see the world in terms of politics, economics, culture, genetics etc, others believe in an alien/interdimensional agenda, some even see the struggle as involving Pixies. Everyone has an individual perspective. Needless to say, there is a great deal of cross-over with regards to the different aspects touched upon. In effect, there are as many different ideals as there are activists.
Our unity of purpose ends once the New World Order is gone. The battle against this monster is a life and death struggle for freedom. We cannot afford to fight amongst each other to the point where we are expending our energies against one another. To do that is self-defeating and doing the work of our enemies. What we need to do is explore our own areas of interest and bring to the battlefield our own expertise.
We may be wrong in our assertions - healthy discussion may bring this out. What is vital is that we treat each other with decorum. How many good people have left the struggle as a result of being abused by someone typing on a computer, safe in the knowledge that no real harm will come his/her way? Some people are more sensitive than others - and perhaps more enlightened. These people could bring a lot to the debate and maybe offer solutions which are lost to us all with their departures. Oversensitivity is however, a problem. The fight against the New World Order requires a certain strength. A balance needs to be struck. The tendancy to resort to name-calling and expulsions from organised formations is very much the work of the enemy.
We do no have to agree with one another - in fact it is probably better that we do not as this enables a proper debate. What we do need is to be civil and decent. Reacting to opinions which we are not comfortable with by being abusive, insulting and offensive is negative and unhelpful. Arguments should be countered in a calm measured manner, or not at all.
Everyone has a different set of priorities and a unique idea as to how to combat the New World Order. We all differ in how we see our ideal future world. Some people have religious/spiritual convictions, some people see the world in terms of politics, economics, culture, genetics etc, others believe in an alien/interdimensional agenda, some even see the struggle as involving Pixies. Everyone has an individual perspective. Needless to say, there is a great deal of cross-over with regards to the different aspects touched upon. In effect, there are as many different ideals as there are activists.
Our unity of purpose ends once the New World Order is gone. The battle against this monster is a life and death struggle for freedom. We cannot afford to fight amongst each other to the point where we are expending our energies against one another. To do that is self-defeating and doing the work of our enemies. What we need to do is explore our own areas of interest and bring to the battlefield our own expertise.
We may be wrong in our assertions - healthy discussion may bring this out. What is vital is that we treat each other with decorum. How many good people have left the struggle as a result of being abused by someone typing on a computer, safe in the knowledge that no real harm will come his/her way? Some people are more sensitive than others - and perhaps more enlightened. These people could bring a lot to the debate and maybe offer solutions which are lost to us all with their departures. Oversensitivity is however, a problem. The fight against the New World Order requires a certain strength. A balance needs to be struck. The tendancy to resort to name-calling and expulsions from organised formations is very much the work of the enemy.
We do no have to agree with one another - in fact it is probably better that we do not as this enables a proper debate. What we do need is to be civil and decent. Reacting to opinions which we are not comfortable with by being abusive, insulting and offensive is negative and unhelpful. Arguments should be countered in a calm measured manner, or not at all.
Labels: Tactics
0 Comments:
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
