|
|---|
Friday, 3 October 2008
Another great tale concerns Moshe Peer who was gassed 6 times - and survived! So much for German efficiency - or is the story perhaps a little, ahem, untrue?
Tuesday, 30 September 2008
Comrades! Our long struggle to power has had a set back. BBC Radio Leeds regularly has Chris Banbury, editor of the Socialist Worker, as a guest on the Liz Green Live show (aired weekdays between 12 and 2pm). Liz even asks for callers to text in on 07786202924 to ask Chris questions. This could seriously hurt our image as a party of the workers.
The Socialist Workers Party is our parent organisation. We in the Anti Natsi League owe our masters allegiance. It is they who provide our attractive lolly pops for bashing over the heads of the fash. They are the ones who work in big city banks and have to endure the hardship of being at the very heart of the capitalist system, earning buckets of filthy money. They have to sacrifice a lot in order to undermine the evil white society. Imagine how it must hurt to see copies of Socialist Worker in WH Smith and other capitalist shops, especially as they won't touch Nationalist material for fear of offeding the establishment.
The BBC are clearly a gang of anti-Semites for putting the leadership of the SWP in this position. Today of all days, as we celebrate Rosh Hashanah, the evil BBC have betrayed their Zionist masters. No longer will we say BBC: Beloved Bolshevik Conspirators. We say to BBC Leeds, desist in making the SWP appear to be part of the system. You are hurting our revolutionary credentials. If you persist, the great unwashed students who make up the ANaL rank and file, will abandon us for more revolutionary organisations such as the Liberal Democrats...
The explanations range from the truly ridiculous to the plausible. The most bizarre is the coincidence theory which would have one believe that 18 hijackers boarded flights undetected on the day that NORAD just happened to be engaged in drills which precisely matched the real events. Further, the World Trade Centre towers which were designed to withstand multiple impacts from 747 æroplanes (in the manner of mosquito netting), collapsed due to fire (even though the jet fuel largely burned up on impact)because some of the asbestos lagging had fallen off.
The towers, states the coincidence theory, then disintegrated into dust with the steel cores evaporating. The heat of the kerosine was allegedly such that the fires in the rubble burned for weeks as if they were the result of thermite charges. Also, we know the identity of the hijackers because they kindly packed their id documents into cases which they forgot to put on the 'planes, and in one case, a passport flew through the fireball of the impact and the destruction of the WTC towers into the street - slightly singed but otherwise ok!
All this, goes the fable, was orchestrated by a terrorist group hiding in caves in Afghanistan, utilising pilots who couldn't fly yet performed turns at high speed which only the military could manage. This lunatic theory gets worse the more one delves into it (the Pentagon, WTC7 etc stories are pure drivel). WTC7 is especially irksome as the building was reported as having collapsed on the BBC twenty minutes BEFORE it fell neatly into its own footprint! Who came up with this nonsense? The 9/11 Commission! Yes, this is the official version of events!
9/11: In Plane Site is a video worth studying for its detailed accounts of the physics of the WTC collapse. Another video worth studying is 9/11: Missing Links which looks into who the real culprits were - not just the manipulated front men who took the blame, but the real villains who planned, financed, covered-up and profited from the events.
Beware of the 9/11 Truth Movement. There are many shills working for the Zionist agenda who are actively involved in focusing attention on the Bush regime. They even go so far as to blame the attacks in London, Madrid, Bali etc on the Neo-Cons in Washington. It is obvious that the international string of events could only be carried out by an international organisation with tentacles in the highest places.
Alex Jones is a key part of the distraction strategy. He has given much useful information concerning the growing Police State in his videos and his website, but he also has produced the awful 'Dark Secrets inside Bohemian Grove' which is an insult to the intelligence of the viewer. He constantly draws attention away from any discussion of the Zionist issue, even managing to dodge it in his alleged exposure of Israeli involvement in the film 'Fabled Enemies'. The evidence that he is a shill is now so strong that it cannot be ignored. He is but one of many.
Like everything in life, examination of the 9/11 atrocity must be undertaken with caution and awareness that many disinfo agents are in place to keep the real truth hidden behind the smoke and mirrors of official and pseudo-underground propaganda.
On the day that racist Jews across the world are reciting the Kol Nidre to allow themselves to lie to the Goyim for the next year, remember the role they and their Masonic Shabbat Goy Zionist bed-fellows played in 9/11 and are still playing in building the New World Order. Remember also that the ordinary Torah Jews are as much victims of these Talmud-huggers as are the Goyim they manipulate for their dæmonic ends.
Do your own research. Believe no-one who puts him/herself up as beacon of truth. The lazy option of accepting other people's research leads to accepting other people's mistakes and to accepting other people's lies.
Monday, 29 September 2008
Steve Sailer has written several essays noting the disproportional large involvement of "minorities" in the housing bubble that triggered the Wall Street bailout, and noting the disproportionately small amount of attention the media has paid to it. More specifically he has focused on the role of "NAMs", non-asian minorities, the euphemism he and his regular commenters use for blacks and latinos.
Sailer attributes the past decade of frenzied borrowing and spending in large part to the trendy but misplaced faith among our politically correct managerial class that relatively poor, uneducated, irresponsible blacks and latinos would pay back loans at the same rate as relatively wealthy, educated, responsible Whites. He labels this zeitgeist The Bullshit Years and calls the resulting bubble-bailout The Diversity Recession.
As usual there are some misguided souls who spring forth to defend the "brown people". Often their argument is based on the rationale that putting minorities in a negative light, i.e. discriminating against them, is nothing but a nefarious attempt to blame everything on them, to make them scapegoats, because this is the only thing racists driven mad by hatred can think to do.
This is a dishonest but predictable response made by seemingly intelligent people. It epitomizes the prevailing political correctness and actually helps demonstrate Sailer's point that "the Establishment" is infected with a mental disease which causes them to deliberately deny certain facts, as well as the consequences of this denial - and to villify anyone who will not behave likewise.
The fact is the plutocrats and their managerial class are more than willing to discriminate, to see minorities and their disproportions, even to the point that this willingness motivates offical policies which disproportionately aid minorities, even to the point where such policies are obviously detrimental to indigenous Whites.
Yesterday Sailer posted a reader's more intelligent objection to his ideas. The argument in The Diversity Recession: A debunking is not based on the virtue of ignoring minorities, or the evil of not ignoring them, but instead aims at denying that minorities were disproportionately involved.
In accepting the validity of discussing disproportion such an argument is a small concession to the truth, and possibly even made in good faith, but the net result is the same: it is an attempt to defuse and deflect attribution of blame away from where it rightfully belongs. When "the Establishment" wishes to do favors for minorities there is little hesitation not only to fudge the numbers in whatever way is required to produce disproportions that need correcting, but also to blame those disproportions, sometimes explicitly, sometimes by implication, on the machinations of Whites who are ostensibly disporportionately "racist".
In the case of Sailer's would-be debunker, if the argument that blacks and latinos were not disproportionately involved in housing bubble foreclosures is correct, then by implication Whites and/or asians must have been. Sailer and his commenters have already provided plenty of evidence countering this debunking, and at any rate it seems a moot point. Under the leadership of Carter, Clinton, and Bush the government stated its belief that blacks and (later) latinos were disproportionately suffering injustice and explicitly sought to right that wrong by applying new, discriminatory standards. Those are the facts.
Sailer's point, which several of his commenters have pointed out to his you-just-want-to-blame-brown-people critics, is not that the "NAMs" conspired to enrich themselves. The point is that intelligent non-"NAMs" in positions of authority consciously chose to pander to "NAMs" and pursue related fiscal policies that on their face would seem highly unintelligent because the macroeconomic consequences are turning out, as some predicted, to be incredibly bad.
This begs the question: why assume these otherwise supra-intelligent people in government and finance were behaving stupidly? Obviously some people got wealthy in the feeding frenzy leading up to the collapse. Some are now getting wealthy shorting and speculating during the collapse. Still more stand to get wealthy by securing taxpayer subsidies for themselves. There are plenty of people who simply do not care how much the macroeconomy suffers as long as their microeconomy gains.
Indeed Sailer and many of his commenters don't really seem to assume "the Establishment" is stupid. They insinuate that the negative results of the malfeasence were mostly unintentional and attribute the blame in part to short-sighted greed and in part to the hopeless naivete of "whiter people" - i.e. liberal, politically correct "whites".
For me this also is only a partial and thus unacceptable concession to the truth. The truth is there is another minority embroiled in this scandal. A minority whose participation nobody seems to want to note. I posted the following comment to The Diversity Recession: A debunking, but it did not make it past moderation:As long as we're examining disproportions of minorities, what about the disproportion of jews who:
To support my assertion of jewish disproportions I direct the reader to look into the matter for themselves. This would involve familiarizing yourself with the concept of disproportion, jewish population statistics, and the rather laborious process of finding and reading wikipedia and NNDB biographical entries of the principals involved. The most common objections are likely to be based on either innumeracy or an inability to discriminate.
A) argue any disproportion perceived as harmful to a minority is caused by White racism (described variously as redlining, institutional racism, White privilege)
B) "innovated" ways around regulation and created new forms of leverage built on the loosened lending resulting largely from A (described variously as mortgage-backed securities, credit default swaps, collateralized debt obligation)
C) advocate taxpayer-funded subsidies for private enterprises (described variously as loans, buyouts, bailouts)
D) enriched themselves via A, B, or C
E) are in positions of authority and oversight, and should now be seeking to ferret out and punish wrongdoing rather than what they are doing, which is trying to find some way, any way to provide more C
I have a theory that explains why the disproportionate involvement of the jewish minority goes even less frequently mentioned than the disproportionate involvement of either blacks or latinos. It has to do with the phrase "anti-semitism".
First, obviously, anyone who would mention the jewish minority in such a negative light can expect it to be denounced as "anti-semitism" (refer to item A). Second, but more important, this same defensive tendency means that if even a relatively small number of the jewish minority perceived that the effects of either the housing bubble or the bailout were bad for themselves or jews in general (disproportionately or not) then they would have already blamed either situation on "anti-semitism".
My theory is that the general jewish perception is that they have participated and benefited disproportionately. But most pundits, even the non-jewish ones who realize this and are un-PC enough to attribute blame to other minorities, dare not even mention jewish involvement for fear of the consequences of criticizing the most powerful and favored minority of all.
Perhaps someone here would do those of us in the White soon-to-be-minority who have been disproportionately defrauded the favor of trying to debunk this theory.
These obstacles should not impede Sailer or his disproportionately intelligent commenters. They have already expended great energy researching and arguing statistics concerning "NAM" disproportions. News From The West has started the task, but it's only the very tip of the jewish-disproportion iceberg. If jews are not disproportionately benefiting, then why haven't they been complaining about disproportionately suffering? It's fairly obvious that jews comprise more than 3% of the reality-twisting race hustlers, government officials who legislated that hustle, financiers who built the house of cards on top of it, economists who validated it, bureacrats and advisors negotiating a "fix" for it, and political and market pundits whose words and voices are right now so overwhelmingly shilling in favor of that fix. Are we to believe that jews enjoyed precisely 3% of the loosened lending largesse and 3% of the financial wizardry profits, and stand to receive only 3% of the bailout money and pay only 3% of the taxes that will fund it?
Hypothetically, if a disproportion of blacks and latinos in "the Establishment" had arranged to dole taxpayer money out to a disproportion of black and latino borrowers and then reward disproportionately black and latino financiers for "failing" because of those policies, then I trust intelligent and honest people would notice and discuss it as the ethnically motivated scandal it would be. Is the fact that the actual circumstances involve a jewish minority indirectly disproportionately enriching themselves by first lobbying for and then leveraging the disproportionate enrichment of blacks and latinos really so much harder to understand or accept?
Come now, what's constraining this discussion of minorities and disproportions?
I had seen advertised a performance of the Black Dyke Brass Band. I've never seen a Brass Band, although I have danced to many Steel Bands in London. I was expecting that the Brass Bands of the North would be a provincial variation on the Steel Bands of London. To my disgust I discovered that far from using Steel oil drums to make music as an expression of the soul of the tribal people of Africa, these Brass Bands are nothing less than the wind section of classical orchestras. They are the very embodiment of the evil white society which oppresses the ethnic peoples of the world. These so-called musical outpourings are offensive to everyone who is fighting for global equality against the tyranny of the Natural Society of Europe.
What I found even more disgusting was that the Black Dyke 'Brass' Band was made up of local Yorkshire men and women, not one of whom was from a minority and as far as I could tell, they were all heterosexual. Not a single purple Doc Marten boot in sight!
How dare these beasts put on their displays of European culture? How dare they, in twenty first century West Yorkshire, arrogantly parade their sickening whiteness? These monsters are PROUD of their heritage and their identity. They, and people like them, are tied to the English past, not to the global future.
Stop the Natsis. Silence the Black Dyke Brass Band.
Friday, 26 September 2008
Where the WASPs Aren’t
Posted by Austin Bramwell on September 23, 2008 (original links and emphasis):The TV show Gossip Girl, now in its second season, chronicles the “scandalous lives of Manhattan’s elite"—"elite" meaning private school kids and their families.
In Gossip Girl, rich kids all have names like Waldorf, Archibald, Bass and van der Woodsen. (In keeping with media’s loathing of the Texas Bass family, the villain is named “Chuck Bass.") In reality, however, the families of the old Protestant Establishment make up only a minority of New York’s wealthy elite. They haven’t entirely disappeared; they still host their debutantes balls, the Forbes family still keeps the Social Register afloat, and a handful of institutions (mostly hidden from public view) are still controlled by WASPs. Some WASPs even have substantial fortunes. (Those fortunes, however, are rarely very old; no Knickerbocker family like “van der Woodsen” can afford New York’s social whirl.) But WASPs as a whole just don’t have the numbers, much less the will, to dominate New York society. As Louis Auchincloss gently puts it, they have “lost their monopoly.”
The comments exerpted below are even more blunt.
Instead, perhaps a plurality of the rich private school kids in Manhattan—even at historically Protestant schools—are Jewish. The Jewish Daily Forward goes so far as to report that Trinity and Dalton, two of the top private schools in New York, are “largely Jewish.” An entire media industry follows the lavish bar mitzvahs of Manhattan private school kids. The closest real-world model for the high school in Gossip Girl, The Dalton School, has historically been the most recherché school for Jewish New Yorkers. (Most WASPs prefer to send their children to the old single-sex grammar schools.) Tellingly, the media now treat Dalton as the most posh school in Manhattan.
In Gossip Girl, however, Jewish kids don’t even exist, much less predominate. Everything about Gossip Girl is modern, from the drugs to the iphones, except for the sociological background, which the writers may as well have lifted out of the Gilded Age.“Gossip Girl” is produced by Josh Schwartz and Stephanie Savage...("Savage" is also used by the radio personality Michael Weiner)and produced by Bob Levy,Leslie Morgenstein and John Stephens.
Posted by Mega Therion on Sep 23, 2008.HCL:
“Never mind Jews took over Manhattan 100 years ago, no one wants to watch a sitcom of them, not even the Jews themselves.
“
The one US sitcom that ever really offended me was Seinfeld, where WASP women were treated as disposable bags of meat.
Most US sitcoms take the more passive-aggressive approach of making the WASP male characters impotent, like Chandler in ‘Friends’ or, more overtly, the Kyle MacLachlan character in Sex and the City (so his WASP wife leaves him for the virile Jewish lawyer).
I also get the impression, contrary to some posters above, that up until the ‘60s US sitcoms & drama generally showed a positive portrayal of WASPs and the WASP nuclear family, especially heartland WASPs (Leave it to Beaver, Mayberry PD etc).
Nowadays we have stuff like ‘Law & Order’, where the Great WASP Beast is slain every week, over and over again, in a manner renminiscent of pagan ritual. Here it’s the always rich, always ‘old money’ white perpetrator, imprisoned by the heroic crusading non-WASP prosecutors (ironically Sam Neill is the very model of a Scots-WASP, playing an Irish-American ADA).
There’s something quasi-religious about it. I think it’s fascinating that Jewish New York writers seem to feel the need to do this, to eternally re-enact their grandfathers’ victories over the WASP establishment on TV, always dressed up in modern clothing.
I suppose there’s a parrallel with the popularity of Cowboy & Indian films, up until the ‘50s, ever re-enacting America’ victory over a long-dead enemy. In Britain for a long time we did the same with World War 2. The obvious difference though is that the primary market for these ritualised TV tales of Victory-over-the-WASP… is WASPs.
Posted by Simon Newman on Sep 24, 2008.As the family of one of those ‘faded elite’ I would like to add a few thoughts:
a. there is little or no solidarity or identity among WASPs anymore - the networks of old families and communication simply do not exist.
b. Jews know FULL WELL they are the dominate elite now, and they also had a sense they were wresting power from WASPs and guilt ridden wasps didn’t seem to be a aware of it. You can often see manifestations of when Jews say the wasps ‘gave up without firing a shot’ - well we didn’t know we were in a war -we thought the jews were really upset about discrimination - it turns out they were upset about Jewish discrimination - they had and have no problem discriminating against us.
I openly admit I have bitterness against the new jewish elite not because they dominate but because they NEVER had any intention of being fair -it was all thinly vieled ethnic self interest. (and I emphasis my bitterness is towards the elite not ‘the jews’
Posted by Van Buskirk on Sep 24, 2008.Question:
the new elite and new system still has to ‘pretend’ the old establishment exists. Why? And once people find out who really runs the prep schools, Ivy Leagues and most elite institutions in NYC if not a large part of the US and just how much their ethics have changed, what are the implications? For example, does our support of Israel take on a whole new light? Or our support of the Oligarchs and hostility towards Russia? What about the hostility towards Christmas ornaments? All the sudden it looks a lot more hatred than fairness.
Posted by knickerblogger on Sep 24, 2008.Van Buskirk:
“Jews know FULL WELL they are the dominate elite now”
They seem nervous about it though. The one US show I see regularly is The Daily Show, so by now I’ve seen dozens of hours of Jon Stewart sitting talking behind that desk, interviewing Bill Kristol, and so on. One can’t help but notice a lot about what Stewart seems to think of himself, his interviewees, his place in the world, and so on. I don’t know exactly how typical he is of the New York Jewish media elite, but from how he’s deferred to I’m guessing he’s not much of an outlier. The main impression I get is nervousness, a kind of “OK, we’re on top NOW, but if THEY ever realise it, who knows what could happen...”
Where the New York WASP elite seems to have been excessively complacent, the New York Jewish elite seems excessively insecure. And their fear is not overtly directed towards any rising group that might one day replace them, but towards the remaining WASPs and especially the non-elite WASP heartlands of ‘flyover country’.
Posted by Simon Newman on Sep 24, 2008.I’m guessing 1/4 of John “Stewart’s” audience has no clue he is Jewish or that his name is John Stuart Liebowitz. Never underestimate the public’s wits.
Posted by Mega Therion on Sep 24, 2008.Yes, it took 100 years but the Jewish Supremacists who own and control the USA are CLEARLY ruling America now and turning it into a police state.
The only people who haven’t figured it out yet are the brain dead.
Posted by Bob on Sep 24, 2008.Bob, I don’t know that I’d phrase it that dramatically - they are clearly the dominate ethnic group in New York and have considerable, disproportionate influence in DC and, imhop, most importantly, in popular culture.
I will say, in my own waspy way, they have utterly failed as custodians and stewards (considering their long brutal history in East europe as buergermeisters , tax collectors and agents of oppressive regimes this should come as no surprise). It think this is deeply culturally ingrained - maybe even genetically- but the high mistrust and hostility towards ‘other’ particular the Christian west, makes them utterly unfit for leadership and trust as a group - individuals are another matter.
Posted by van buskirk on Sep 24, 2008.ACRONYM ENVY
One of the things we experience on the West Coast is some resentment in Jewish circles about the fact that only the Anglo-Saxons are allowed an acronym. Jews are insisting that WEJ is the correct acronym for white Jews when WASP is used, simply for equity.
WEJ as we all know stands for White European Jew and is pronounced “wedge” in the same manner that WASP is pronounced as the name of an insect.
It is to be much regretted that Austin Bramwell ignored this element of courtesy and we have to ask ourselves if he might be motivated by a little bias against Jews.
Posted by Sally on Sep 24, 2008.Interesting post! I’m new here, so I was amused but puzzled by some of the exceptionally silly crypto- (and not-so-crypto-)anti-Semitic comments above. But I think I figured it out!
I’m pretty sure the people making these comments are themselves Jews, trying to discredit WASPs by portraying them as anti-Semitic to the other readers, who are also Jews.
The Jews posting the faux-anti-Semitic comments are, of course, doing it out of a psychological need to simultaneously co-opt and destroy the power that they feel has traditionally been in the hands of mainline Protestant blog commenters.
And the Jew readers of the blog are here as a result of an assimilation neurosis that makes them want to be like WASPs, which they believe entails reading anti-Semitic comments left by “fellow WASPs.”
So, as a Jew myself, I’d just like to say, to commenters and lurkers alike, “Hi guys! See you at the next world domination meeting!”
Posted by JS on Sep 24, 2008.I think the pattern for Jews in relation to the Wasp governing class is ape, rape and escape. First they ape the Wasps; then they financially, politically and culturally rape them; then they escape them by surpassing them.
Commenter JS demonstrates that it is not possible to observe, openly and matter of fact, that jews now dominate New York's upper class without at least one reality-inverting anti-anti-semite showing up to shovel the usual combination of mockery, denial, fear, and effrontery.
We now live in a very dynamic period in which different Jews are at each stage of the ape, rape and escape process.
Posted by Tappir Zapper on Sep 24, 2008.
Edmund Connelly's Reel Bad WASPs provides an analysis of Caddyshack and Happy Gilmore as further examples of jewish in-your-face culture war grave-dancing - examples which predate Gossip Girls.Whether big screen or small screen, the message has been the same, as Hollywood insider Ben Stein noted. Writing in 1976 (and updated in book form in 1979), Stein explained how the preponderance of Jewish writers—men who assumed mainstream America hated them, so the writers loathed them in return—meant that a false image of majority Americans was being created:
A national culture is making war upon a way of life that is still powerfully attractive and widely practiced in the same country. . . . Feelings of affection for small towns run deep in America, and small-town life is treasured by millions of people. But in the mass culture of the country, a hatred for the small town is spewed out on television screens and movie screens every day. . . . Television and the movies are America's folk culture, and they have nothing but contempt for the way of life of a very large part of the folk. . . . People are told that their culture is, at its root, sick, violent, and depraved, and this message gives them little confidence in the future of that culture. It also leads them to feel ashamed of their country and to believe that if their society is in decline, it deserves to be.David Gelernter pointed out in a wonderful essay that “the old elite used to get on fairly well with the country it was set over. Members of the old social upper-crust elite were richer and better educated than the public at large, but approached life on basically the same terms.” The new, heavily Jewish elite is not only different from the non-Jewish masses, in Gelernter words, “it loathes the nation it rules.”
"WASP" rule was legitimate and forthright, so long as it lasted. To a fault they followed their precious principles, shared their power, and their progeny now find themselves marginalized to the point that they cannot or will not prevent their own scapegoating. The "WEJs" in contrast deny they have power. Yet it is only because they do have power and suffer no hesitation in using it that their domination goes unchallenged, even as it visits social and economic upheaval upon the law-abiding, taxpaying disproportionately White "middle class".
Now is the time to act against our coming enslavement. There are still people around who think that the way to achieve freedom from the Global Superstate is to physically attack its institutions and bureaucrats. At best this is political naïvety; at worst it is the work of agents provocateur.
The architects of the New World Order have consistently used fake terrorism as a tool to take away the freedoms of the people. In the United Kingdom, the British Secret Police (MI5, MI6) planted operative in the Orange and Green communities in order to create civil disorder. By manipulating the (British Loyalist) Masonic Orange Order and its counterpart, the (Irish Nationalist) Masonic Irish Republican Brotherhood, the hidden hand of British Intelligence was able to create a situation of fear and terror in the province of Ulster, which spread across the frontiers into Great Britain and Eire.
The ordinary people of the British Isles have no desire to butcher their neighbours. The terrorist atrocities were the work of the State, with Dublin collaborating with London. In many cases the vile atrocities, which led to the deaths of thousands, were carried out by people in the direct employ of the State. In other cases the perpetrators were guided by State handlers. No major terrorist atrocity in the Ulster 'Troubles' occurred without official control and direction. The individuals who reacted to the MI5/6 controlled terrorism only helped fuel the conflict. They became the foot soldiers of the hidden rulers, aiding their real enemies. The State used them in an elaborate war game - using Ulster and the British mainland as a practising ground for dealing with any real future civil uprisings.
People who advocate 'Direct Action' act themselves in the manner of the First World War Generals who ordered the ordinary soldiers to go 'over the top' of the trenches, to almost certain death. These scoundrels were safe in their plush offices. To quote the Crass song 'The Generals sip Bacardi while the Privates feel the pain'. Nothing has changed. The advocates of Direct Action who guide the civilian infantrymen into street battles rarely, if ever, get their own hands dirty.
When organised street confrontations occur, the leaders from both sides will be following the same agenda. Forget the labels (Nationalist, Anti-Fascist etc)- the fact that the alleged rival leaders are advocating Direct Action points to the fact that they are doing the work of the State. It doesn't matter whether they are acting in such a way because they have been blackmailed by the authorities, because they are willing traitors, or because they are employed by the State. What matters is that by following their insane agenda, people will get arrested, hurt, or worse, and the power of the State to smash any organised opposition will increase. This will threaten everyone regardless of politics. As a rule of thumb, if a planned event leads to people getting arrested, the chances are that State operatives are involved. The leaders who advocate Direct Action are the enemy of those they purport to lead. They have an agenda which involves pain for others and glory for themselves.
The first result of Direct Action is injury and potentially death for those who are incited by their leaders to 'get stuck in'. The lasting result is greater power to the State. In the UK we now have extreme gun control, ever more knife control, omnipresent surveillance and draconian legislation to restrict the movement and association of individuals. This destruction of our freedoms has all come about as a result of false terrorism. The State design an atrocity, create an outcry from the public (via the controlled media) for 'something to be done' and then deliver the solution of more intrusive legislation to 'protect' the public from reccurrences. Every aspect is controlled. Direct Action is a tool of the State.
The only way to unravel the monster which rules over us is to refuse to play its game. We are losing our freedoms because we are allowing the State to take our freedoms from us. The anti-human Police State exists because we let it exist. We pay our taxes without question. We obey every ludicrous law. If a significant proportion of us were to peacefully disobey their ridiculous laws, they would not be able to arrest us all. If we refuse to pay the fines they would impose, they could not imprison us all. The only laws we need to obey are the laws of morality; the laws of the natural society - not to kill, steal, rape, lie and cheat one another. Laws such as smoking in public, paying for a TV licence, etc are laws with no moral value which serve only to control us.
Resist the New World Order. Refuse to submit to their control. Demand a restoration of National Freedom by means of the abolition of the EU, NAU, USAN, APU, AU, NATO etc. Resist in every peaceful means at your disposal. Beware of those who would lead you down the path of violence - they are a part of the problem. Act wisely and non-violently to make yourself a part of the solution. We have built our own prisons by supporting our oppressors. Remove that support and their prisons will fall.
