|
---|
Monday, 29 June 2009
Whites fleeing Britain - by Michael Walsh
240,000 Britons in Mass Evacuation Every Year
The number of Britons fleeing the United Kingdom has reached levels last experienced during the assisted passage era. Then, hundreds of thousands of destitute emigrants escaped the poverty of post-war Britain to settle abroad. Today for the first time in history over 1,000,000 retired Britons choose to live anywhere but England, and most but not all choose mainland Europe. It is estimated that 240,000 UK citizens of all ages are now burning their boats and turning their backs on the United Kingdom - every single year.
One newspaper alone, the Friday edition of the Daily Mail carries nearly sixty advertisements for companies cashing in on 'the evacuation'. These include details of 36 'escape centre' exhibitions in England alone where England's refugees can seek assistance in re-locating abroad.
At these exhibitions, some of them multi-stand, visitors in their thousands queue to learn about the attractions of life outside their own beleaguered country.
Typically one exhibition at York fielded over 100 homes abroad specialists early in June last year. As with similar 'escape departure points' it attracted unprecedented numbers of would-be UK refugees.
Although the doors to the exhibition were not scheduled to be open until 10.00am by a little after 9.00am two queues, each a hundred metres long, had formed. In each one desperate and depressed Britons chose to stand in the rain, each with a pre-taxed entrance fee of £3, to get the chance of seeking a new life abroad.
"I WISH TONY BLAIR COULD SEE THIS EXODUS."
One exhausted exhibitor said, "It was just like the January sales. As soon as the doors open they pour in; we never even get the chance to eat a sandwich for lunch! It was the same at the much bigger exhibitions at Earls Court, the Cumberland Hotel at Marble Arch, and the National Exhibition Centre in Birmingham."
A visitor said ruefully: "I wish Tony Blair could see what he is doing to this country - and the results," he added as he waved his hand at the throngs surging around the various exhibits.
The reasons given for leaving England in such numbers are varied but they all add up to general dissatisfaction. Whilst Britain's poor weather is a factor it doesn't stand alone. Tony Blair and his cohorts have little control over the weather anyway.
When questioned as to their reason for seeking a new life abroad the overwhelming majority of escapees is quick to respond. "We are over taxed and working for nothing' is on everyone's lips. "Bloody immigration" is often cited but such words are whispered in hushed tones as though frightened that they will be overheard.
Crime being out of control, Britain's drug culture, the cost of living, the state of the health 'service' and a general feeling that England has had its chips makes up the general consensus. As one astute American put it: "Britain today is like the Titanic. and they are not even hanging around to watch the bubbles."
THE GREAT ESCAPE
A tired stand advisor at one of the exhibitions told of how visitors are dismayed to learn that they may have to wait up to two years, sometimes three, for their new home abroad to be built. Some opt for re-sale properties so they can leave quickly, which is a good idea as demand is pushing prices up anyway. He grinned and added that when dealing with apprehensive migrants he introduces himself as 'the Chairman of the Escape Committee.'
"That way," he added they know exactly where I am coming from. They identify and often pour out expressions of disgust at their country's rapid decline.
The rush to leave Britain may increase as it is revealed that Britain's trade balance has now reached a record 3 billion pounds. This is the difference between what it sells and purchases. Such a deficit identifies the depressed manufacturing and service economy, which is faltering. Few believe the massaged unemployment figures.
The hapless Chancellor of the Exchequer, Gordon Brown now concedes that the artificially strong pound needs to be devalued by as much as 20% to bring it in to line with the more realistically valued Euro.
ASSET STRIPPING
Experts say this cannot happen overnight as the fragile economy would likely collapse as a result. They predict that it will gradually be reduced over the next two years. "Death duties, the erosion of pensions and the evaporation of savings is driving people to desperation," one said.
A visitor returning from a recent trip to southern Spain says he often chats with ex-patriates. They cannot bring themselves to believe what has happened to their country. One pensioner when asked if she ever returned home to England, or if she missed England at all, vehemently replied that she didn't and anyway she couldn't afford to return.
UK NOW MOST EXPENSIVE COUNTRY IN EUROPE
Many if not most are heading directly to the Spanish Costas; the Mediterranean coastal strip running from Barcelona at the north of the Costa Brava, right through the 210 kilometre Costa Blanca Stretch and through to the Costa del Sol. All paradise compared to Britain. The lower cost of living, crime negligible by comparison, a better quality of life, are all a big draw.
Others are evacuating to France, northern Italy, the Greek islands and in particular Cyprus and Crete where crime is just 6% that of Britain's. Many others are heading west to Florida in the United States.
The United Kingdom is now the most expensive country in Europe, where taxation has even passed that of notorious Germany. The cost of living and house prices in particular are driving native-born Britons abroad. Many young Britons can no longer afford a home of their own in their own country. Mortgages after the highest taxation levies in Europe simply can't be paid. Some young married couples are facing first home mortgages of £200,000 and are being driven out of their own country.
THE ALARMING EXCHANGE OF CULTURES
The Daily Mail recently reported that "Massive increases in house prices in recent years have made Britain one of the most expensive places to buy a home in the world. Low prices, the strong pound and low interest rates have led to a surge in demand for foreign property and the search for a better quality of life."
One exhibitor who didn't wish to be named said: "How much longer can any country take it? The equivalent of a fair sized city is now leaving every year. They are taking their wealth, their experience, and their way of life abroad.
In the meantime similar numbers of incoming refugees, who have no means of support; people who have no home, no skills, who aren't able to contribute in any way, are replacing them. People who furthermore have a cultural background wholly alien to that of the indigenous population. It is frightening," he concluded.
The refugees in similar numbers are flooding in to take advantage of huge handouts, funded by the escapees before they join 'the chicken run' to southern Europe and the United States and the Republic of Ireland.
Homes Overseas magazine says: "Experts are still forecasting moderate growth in sales over the next two or three years and, over the next five, some are predicting up to two million families will move into the Costa Blanca region over the next five years."
BRITAIN, A SINK ESTATE OF POVERTY AND DESPAIR
Many emigrants are attracted to the more prosperous life abroad where people can still stroll, shop, enjoy life without fear of being mugged or be accosted by druggies and aggressive street beggars that infest Britain's mean streets today.
"It's the quality of life that people go for. If you look at the cost of living, it's at least 40 per cent lower than in the UK or Ireland," reports Richard Saunders, a prominent expert.
Fleeing Britons are also outraged by the depressingly predictable sleaze in politics, degrading material being shown on television, and the poorest educational opportunities in Europe. "Britain is one stinking sink estate, riddled with crime, vandalism, and despair," said one exhibition visitor.
Many are attracted to Cyprus where, as in other parts of Europe, bi-lingualism is commonplace and over half the young people enjoy a university education. Derek Workman, who left for Spain two years ago, when asked what the main differences in lifestyle were replied, "Immeasurable." Asked if he had any regrets the ex-patriot responded ruefully. "Only that I didn't do it 20 years ago - a phrase you oft hear repeated here."
He smiled when asked what he missed most about England? "The Spanish phrase is nada de nada meaning absolutely nothing - with bells on!" he grinned.
EX-SERVICEMEN THE MOST DISGRUNTLED
John ------ an ex-career officer in the Royal Air Force said that the happiest moments of his life was when sailing across the English Channel, with his family, heading for a new life abroad. Another, an ex-colonel in the Kings Regiment echoed his views. "England," he surmised. "I don't give a cuss if I never see it again."
It is estimated that during any one weekend scores of homes abroad exhibitions are held throughout England. Some cities host several at the one time. An exhibitor for a Spanish company told of one small city in which three organisations were assisting people in their quest to leave Britain, yet they still couldn't cope with the numbers attending.
He recounted with a smile how one harassed family man, commenting on the continental ambience background music suggested that it might be more appropriate to play the theme tune to The Great Escape movie.
Contact Michael Walsh - euroman_uk@yahoo.co.uk
meanwhile...
British citizenship has rocketed almost 500 per cent under Labour.
The number of British passports given to migrants is set to hit a record 220,000 this year.
In the first three months of 2009, 54,615 citizenship applications were approved - up 57 per cent on the same period in 2008.
At that rate, the number receiving passports - and with them the right to full benefits - this year will smash the record of 164,540 set in 2007.
Last year the total was 129,310, and when Labour came to power in 1997, just 37,010 people were given citizenship.
It means approvals have rocketed by almost 500 per cent under the current Government.
Officials blame the massive increase on the fact that ministers are introducing a 'tough' new system of earned citizenship next year.
They say migrants are rushing to obtain their passports before they have to undergo an extra probationary period.
Under the new system, obtaining a passport will take six to eight years from a migrant's arrival in most cases, rather than the current five.
Critics said the rush shows just how lax the current system is.
They also point out that, by handing out so many passports, the Government is changing the make-up of Britain without any public debate.
Shadow home secretary Chris Grayling said: 'This is yet another example of the Government's incompetence in managing our immigration system.
'They openly admit they are introducing a new system and that everyone is rushing to get in before it. It just smacks of ministers having no idea what they are doing.'
Immigration minister Phil Woolas said the new passports system for migrants will save taxpayers £2billion, but his shadow counterpart, Chris Grayling, branded Labour incompetent at managing the flow of migrants
Grants of settlement, the stage before citizenship, were also up in the first three months of 2009, running at an annual rate of 190,000.
Sir Andrew Green, chairman of Migrationwatch UK, said: 'At this rate, grants of settlement will have trebled under Labour.
'We are on course for a massive increase in the population which nobody wants and on which nobody has been consulted.
'At this rate, grants of settlement will have trebled under Labour'
'No wonder people are so angry with the political class. It is not just fingers in the till, it is fingers in their ears when the public have a serious concern.'
The top five native countries of those gaining citizenship in the past two years have been India, Pakistan, Iraq, Somalia and Zimbabwe.
India and Pakistan are historic sources of migration, particularly via marriage to a British citizen. The large numbers of Iraqis, Somalis and Zimbabweans reflects the fact that asylum seekers who arrived at the start of this decade have now been in the UK long enough to receive citizenship.
The introduction of the earned citizenship scheme was recently delayed by nine months, to Decemember 2010.
Immigration minister Phil Woolas claimed yesterday that it would save taxpayers up to £2billion in benefit claims.
He said the new rules will deter some migrants from travelling to the UK or staying long enough to obtain citizenship and benefits.
Until a passport application has been approved, migrants do not have access to child benefit, council and housing tax benefits and income support.
Mr Woolas insisted: 'The pull factor of coming to the UK is to be taken away.'
The Home Office said last night: 'The increase in settlement grants reflects the success of UK Border Agency staff in clearing outstanding applications. It also reflects the Home Office's decision to tighten up the criteria for settlement.
'In 2006 we raised the qualifying period for settlement from four to five years, which meant that migrant workers who wanted to stay permanently had to wait an extra year.
'We have also set out our plans for earned citizenship which demand that people earn the right to stay.
'We are now looking at raising the bar further by applying a points-based system to the path to citizenship and we will consult on this in the summer.'
Source - the Daily Mail, London 22.6.9
Labels: Immigration, New World Order, Westminster
Friday, 26 June 2009
For people who read this blog regularly, I apologise for not posting much this week. The reason for this is I have been helping to get articles on to another blog which is dedicated to the Zionist asset, Alex Jones. He has become such a thorn in the side of all who love freedom, that it has become necessary to gather evidence of his treachery so as to awaken his acolytes into the folly of being in his thrall. I hope to get back to writing here more regularly next week.
In the mean time, please visit http://alexjonesisazionistshill.blogspot.com to find out more about the false leader who is following the design of the Protocols of Zion by leading a false opposition movement which, in reality, is pushing the Globalist agenda onto those who have become hypnotised by his slick and emotive films.
Labels: Agents Provocateur, Protocols of Zion, Tactics
Wednesday, 24 June 2009
The recent turmoil in Iran and our regime's reaction to it are of interest even to those of us who aren't much concerned which hostile alien runs a country full of hostile aliens on the other side of the planet.
For example, contrast the media's intense interest in iran with it's interest in the ongoing violence right next door. The Los Angeles Times has written about Mexico's Drug War, as have others. From their own occasional reports the situation is so out of control they can hardly ignore it. "Mexico Under Siege - The drug war at our doorstep", "It's a war. - Mexican President Felipe Calderon", writes the LAT. Yet despite the occasional splash of recognition nothing much else happens.
When will the regime show some sustained concern, and when will someone in the media ask Obama "what took you so long" to address the war next door, across a border you don't want to defend?
The answer is never. Or at least not until the regime is toppled.
Violent immigrant aliens, economic crisis, and an outbreak of disease all cause the regime to leap to the defense of the aliens. Meanwhile they officially recognize native Whites as their most feared enemy, even acknowledging that we're displeased by and reacting to their own behavior. What's lacking is a broader recognition of the strength and nature of this assault on Whites.
Much of the attention the media has directed toward iran has the curious effect of revealing their double standards on political rights and censorship. In iran we're told the "cracking down" on people trying to express themselves is a hallmark of totalitarianism and thuggery. Meanwhile at home in the West the same media plays an instrumental role in demonizing "racism" and "hate".
Attempted Iran media clampdown meets Internet age contains a typical example of the media's attitude toward iran:
CNN turned in part to the social-networking sites, broadcasting images posted on Facebook and Twitter, and explaining on-air that it was using "creativity" to cover a big event under government restrictions.Yes indeed they are committed to using "creativity" to get the word out about the events in an alien country. At home however they demonstrate a decided lack of interest in the squashing of White political free expression. The case of Simon Sheppard and Stephen Whittle for instance. The Mail's Race-hate Britons return to UK for sentencing is fairly typical of the sparse, unsympathetic coverage:
"We cannot verify readily some of this material that we're going to show you," correspondent David Mattingly warned viewers. Much of the material on Twitter is posted anonymously.
CNN spokeswoman Bridget Leininger said that adding context and explaining issues was necessary when reporting with such online sources. "We are committed to making the most information available in a tough news environment, while being totally transparent with the audience," she said.
Two Britons who fled to the United States after they were accused of waging a campaign of hate against Jews and other minority groups appeared in front of a British court today after they were returned to the UK.
Simon Sheppard, 52, and Stephen Whittle, 42, were convicted of a number of race-hate crimes at Leeds Crown Court following two lengthy trials, the last of which finished in January.
The investigation into the men began when a complaint about a leaflet called 'Tales of the Holohoax' was reported to the police in 2004 after it was pushed through the door of a Synagogue in Blackpool.Here we see evidence, and only after the outcome of the case has been locked down tight, of the single standard behind what only seems to be a double standard. They sing the praises of free expression so that someone, anyone, replaces Mr. Wipe Israel Off the Map, while mostly burying their own disgust with the free expression of Sheppard and Whittle. Whether with iran or the persecution of our own free speaking heretics, the regime is concerned primarily about what's best for jews. It's a rhetorical question, but Whose Country Is This Anyway?
Here's another example of the government and its media being on the same page:
In what appeared to be a coordinated exchange, President Obama called on the Huffington Post's Nico Pitney near the start of his press conference and requested a question directly about Iran.Iranian aliens are able to ask questions of the US president. Iranian aliens are "courageous" to communicate online.
“Nico, I know you and all across the Internet, we've been seeing a lot of reports coming out of Iran,” Obama said, addressing Pitney. “I know there may actually be questions from people in Iran who are communicating through the Internet. Do you have a question?”
Pitney, as if ignoring what Obama had just said, said: “I wanted to use this opportunity to ask you a question directly from an Iranian.”
He then noted that the site had solicited questions from people in the country “who were still courageous enough to be communicating online.”
Reporters typically don’t coordinate their questions for the president before press conferences, so it seemed odd that Obama might have an idea what the question would be. Also, it was a departure from White House protocol by calling on The Huffington Post second, in between the AP and Reuters.The media, the government, and jewish activists (specifically the SPLC) have most assuredly coordinated their own anti-White activities here at home.
Bonnie Erbe, a media heavyweight who just happens to be jewish, responded to an attack in which a single non-jew was killed by calling for the government to Round Up Hate-Promoters Now, Before Any More Holocaust Museum Attacks:
If yesterday's Holocaust Museum slaying of security guard and national hero Stephen Tyrone Johns is not a clarion call for banning hate speech, I don't know what is. Playwright Janet Langhart Cohen appeared on CNN yesterday right after the shooting, as she wrote a play that was supposed to have been debuted at the Holocaust Museum last night. Her play is about Emmett Till, whose lynching helped launch the Civil Rights Movement, and Ann Frank, whose diary told the story of Holocaust victims in hiding in the Netherlands during World War II.The regime wants the internet open to iranian aliens (at least for now), and closed to "hate speakers". In fact silencing "hate" isn't enough. They want to "Round Up Hate-Promoters Now". Erbe's hysterical attitude reveals her own hate. The dishonest and hypocritical language of "hate" provides a politically correct way for jews to openly do themselves, from positions of power, what they constantly accuse powerless "haters" of wanting to do to them. They project their own thoughts onto others and then cry "hate!" It's disgusting as well as hateful.
She said something must be done about ridding the Internet and the public dialogue of hate speech. I agree.
Labels: bonnie erbe, censorship, iran, media, mexico, simon sheppard, stephen whittle
Saturday, 20 June 2009
A good (and true) joke, according to Lawrence Auster:
From a discussion at the blog Half Sigma, where the topic is the irrationality of the Jew-hating and Israel-hating white nationalists. A commenter says:Auster apparently didn't find the pseudonym of the commenter or the rest of his comment funny. Neither did I, but here it is:As I said on the von Brunn thread, the bigger mystery is why they hate the Federal Reserve.
The Fed has nothing directly or indirectly to do with race or genetics. It is a purely economic issue. But von Brunn and the Stormfronters want a gold standard almost as badly as a second Holocaust.
Yes, most Fed board members - including Bernanke and Greenspan - are Jewish; but the Stormfronters think the Jews already control ***Everything***.The Undiscovered Jew's "joke" was made in response to a brief post made by Half Sigma titled Why are white nationalists anti-Israel?:
If the Jews already control Western civilization from top to bottom then why should the Fed be such a focus of their hatred?
Posted by: The Undiscovered Jew | June 12, 2009 at 02:41 PM
More accurately they should be called white gentile nationalists, because they don’t want white people who are Jewish in their movement. They would love for all the Jews to leave the United States, but where would the Jews go if not to Israel?All of this - from Half Sigma's indignant confusion, to Undiscovered Jew's sack dance over a strawman, to Auster's shallow smirking - comes across as puerile, not funny. I don't presume to speak for James von Brunn or "the Stormfronters" or anyone else who "hates" the Federal Reserve, but it's easy to demonstrate how self-servingly clueless these three jews are.
Conversely, if Israel is taken over by Muslims, there would be millions of Jewish refugees, and the bulk of them would probably wind up in the United States. Thus white nationalists seem to be actively working against their goals by being pro-Palestinian and anti-Israel.
The question was merely a rhetorical one, because the answer is that the white gentile nationalists hate the Jews so much that they just want to enjoy seeing Israel overrun by Muslims.
Let's work backwards toward the source, in the order I've just introduced Larry and his cousins Moe and Curly.
- - -
Auster frequently provides grist for my mill. Some say too much. His part in this post is small. See Fruitloopable Presumption for more about him.
In the past few months Auster has spent a great deal of effort attacking and denouncing Darwinism. I'm not going to bother picking apart his "logic", he's cleary doing it for the same reason he does anything else. He thinks Darwinism is bad for jews, though it isn't really Darwinism per se that he dislikes, it's the use of evolution and genetics in understanding the world and how jews stand in it that Auster can't stand. This he labels "jew-hate", and there's nothing he hates more than "jew-haters". Except maybe "israel-haters".
Auster's passionate hatred for hate runs so deep that it wraps around and he actually gets a chuckle from the jokes one jewish Darwinist tells another about those jew-hating israel-haters, AKA "the Stormfronters". This fills him with such mirth that he left the name and punchline of The Undiscovered Jew undiscovered.
The Undiscovered Jew's name actually is a bit of a joke - an ironic reference to the jewish tendency to keep their jewish identity and interests from being discovered, except when they find it more convenient to proclaim the significance of their jewishness, which very often coincides with them ridiculing any non-jew who thinks jewishness has significance or is worth discovering.
The contradiction U-Jew sees in "Stormfronter" logic reflects his own witlessness.
The Fed has nothing directly or indirectly to do with race or genetics.He finds this misunderstanding of "Stormfronter" understanding so critical that he reiterates it:
It is a purely economic issue.Except it isn't.
But von Brunn and the Stormfronters want a gold standard almost as badly as a second Holocaust.Non sequitur. It is curious however that so many of those who think any negative proclamation about "the jews" is ipso facto "irrational" "hate", but have no problem making truly irrational statements (as Half Sigma and U-Jew do) about the mythically monolithicness of "the Stormfronters", which for Half Sigma and his commenters is nothing but a euphemism for pro-Whites they deliberately misconstrue instead as "jew-haters" (which they do because they are pro-jew).
Yes, most Fed board members - including Bernanke and Greenspan - are Jewish; but the Stormfronters think the Jews already control ***Everything***.So here we see that right after denying it U-Jew actually does see "the Stormfronter" point; but what he's really trying to do is distort it. Better than anyone else jews are acutely aware that they don't control everything. Many wish they did. The ones most obsessed with control are exactly the ones who are so quick to tick off the various vexing ways jews don't "control ***Everything***". Jewish media influence? "Ted Turner isn't jewish!"
If the Jews already control Western civilization from top to bottom then why should the Fed be such a focus of their hatred?Here's a better question. One that isn't based on a false premise. If "the Stormfronters" are powerless why should they be such a focus of hatred from "anti-liberal" "race-realists" like Auster and Half Sigma? Don't they have bigger fish to fry?
If U-Jew is in the slightest bit curious what causes anybody to "hate" the Federal Reserve he could begin by watching The Money Masters. This 215 minute documentary-style video reviews financial history, describing in deracinated jew-blind layman's terms how the modern Western banking system evolved over the last several hundred years, largely through war and intrigue. The distinct impression it leaves is that the banking system is essentially fraudulent, based on the creation of wealth by trickery (AKA fractional reserve banking) and the subversion and subordination of citizens and their governments to plutocrats and their agents (eg. the "international bankers" who own and operate the Fed). All you have to do is add even a dim "race realist" recognition of disproportionate jewish involvement in finance such as U-Jew exhibits and you have the solution to U-Jew's own very disingenous, very jewish reasoning.
Now on to Half Sigma and his rhetorical question: Why are white nationalists anti-Israel?
More accurately they should be called white gentile nationalists, because they don’t want white people who are Jewish in their movement. They would love for all the Jews to leave the United States, but where would the Jews go if not to Israel?Once again it's not possible to ignore the simplistic and unjustified implication that all White nationalists (i.e. Whites who would prefer to live in a White country that defends and pursues White interests) oppose jewish nationalism. The fact is that jewish nationalists have a country they can go to, where jewish interests are openly pursued and non-jews are second class citizens. This is only one of the many inconsistencies that irritate White nationalists. Another fact is that many jews, whether they support jewish nationalism or not, are rabid opponents of Whites pursuing their own interests, never mind nationalism. Any White who begins to experience even the dimmest racial consciousness can't ignore that jews are their most rabid opponents. Some jews who like the societies Whites build and desperately wish to be seen as "white" (as Half Sigma and Auster do) react to the undeniable reality of jewish aggression against Whites by desperately spinning excuses and rationalizations, in the end absurdly laying all the blame on "the Stormfronters" or "the jew-haters".
There are myriad organizations dedicated to the defense and pursuit of jewish interests, many of them excluding non-jews, even if only implicitly. If only in response then it is reasonable that Whites, nationalist or otherwise, organize for our own interests and exclude jews. We have and would be more successful at it were it not for the constant, venomous attacks on us by jewish organizations.
Conversely, if Israel is taken over by Muslims, there would be millions of Jewish refugees, and the bulk of them would probably wind up in the United States. Thus white nationalists seem to be actively working against their goals by being pro-Palestinian and anti-Israel.Yes, no doubt if israel collapses it will all be blamed on "the anti-semites". And yes, jews are already preparing to evacuate to the US. See for example The Kvetcher's Jewish Immigration Policy as Worst Case Scenario Appears Ever More Likely, especially the outrageously arrogant comments of blode0322, who in contrast to Half Sigma's suggested terminology I'd describe as a white non-Gentile nationalist.
Half Sigma concludes:
The question was merely a rhetorical one, because the answer is that the white gentile nationalists hate the Jews so much that they just want to enjoy seeing Israel overrun by Muslims.Race-realist Half Sigma's question was rhetorical, and the answer oddly based on the same "hate" rationale that race-denying "liberals" use, because he doesn't want to face the real answer, which is that jews aren't White. Unfortunately for Sigma the real answer explains not only the general antipathy self-conscious Whites have for the jewish state of israel, but also for the obvious fear and loathing jews express toward anything White - whether it's spelling White with a capital W, White nationalism, or even a Whites-only political party that doesn't exclude them.
Half Sigma, recognizing this threat to his convenient and comfortable hatred of "jew-hate", followed up later the same day with a lame assertion. In Jews are white he writes:
Judaism is a religion and not a race. Jews can be of any race, even black. If you think that Spaniards are white, then you would also conclude that Sephardic Jews from Spain are white.Coming from a popular, supposedly intelligent, "race-realist" blogger this confused babble would be perplexing, except that it makes perfect sense and is perfectly consistent once we realize that it's coming from a jew. Why should Whites not consider jewishness significant? Why should we look the other way while jewish apologists peddle such incoherent nonsense as a cover for jewish attacks on us? What Half Sigma is writing is in fact just another more insidious form of attack. "You can't call yourself White! You should call yourself "white gentile", because I as a jew consider myself "white" and I get to order you around because you hate jews!"
Only white nationalists and Stormfront types insist that Ashkenazi Jews aren’t white, and that’s because they hate Jews but love whites, so they need some sort of rationalization for the inconsistency.
A year ago, Steve Sailer posted a 3-D chart showing how Ashkenazi Jews cluster genetically when compared to other ethnicities, and it’s clear from the chart that Jews are similar to Russians and Western Europeans, and quite dissimilar from Middle Eastern ethnicities such as Druze, Samaritans, and Yemenites.
You shouldn’t even need the chart to figure out that Jews are white, because common sense should inform you that you can’t tell the difference between Jews and other Europeans. It’s true that some Jews have a Jewish look about them, but Italians have an Italian look about them, Irish have an Irish look about them, and Poles have a Polish look about them, but those European ethnicities are rarely accused of not being white. No one is better at identifying other Jews than Jews themselves, and Jews usually can’t tell whether or not someone looks Jewish. I remember an organization in the Phoenix area which threw parties for Jewish singles, and they would always ask at the door, “are you Jewish?” The reason they had to ask the question is because they can’t tell by looking. It’s hard to imagine a black organization asking at the door, “are you black?”
I don’t know of any Ashkenazi Jews who consider themselves anything other than white. There are many Jews who, when asked their ethnicity, say that they’re Jewish, but I don’t say that. I tell people I’m half Russian and half Polish. I would encourage more Jews to identify themselves that way.
Jewish political groups aren’t doing anything to defend against the anti-Semitic meme that Jews aren’t white because Jewish groups tend to be very liberal, and liberals think that defending against the accusation that one isn’t white would be admitting that you believe that there’s something wrong with not being white, and it would be racist to think there’s something wrong with not being white. But in my opinion, it’s not racist to point out that some white nationalists are saying stuff about Jews which isn’t true.
Immediately Half Sigma's own pro-jewish commenters tried to point out his foolishness. Unlike Auster, Half Sigma runs a somewhat open forum, but like Auster he shows the same discomfort with criticism, meticulously inserting his rebuttals right into the first few dissenting commenters comments. Later on The Kvetcher responded with Overreaching on Jewish Whiteness:
Half Sigma starts out with a half-truth, noting, “Judaism is a religion and not a race. Jews can be of any race…” This is, in and of itself, true, of course. Judaism is not based or limited to any race. In fact, there is no explicit term for race in the Torah.Kvetcher points out a graph that better illustrates jewish genetic distinctiveness at Gene Expression: SNPs don't lie. Another graph is attached to Criticizing Auster. It indicates ashenazi jews are genetically more distinct from Poles than Poles are from Italians or Greeks. I'm a Darwinist in the sense that I think the sociopolitcal distinctions I've already made between jews and Whites spring largely from personality differences which spring largely from genetics.
But Jews are, to a large degree, a specific people sharing similar genetic code. The reference to The Jews in our liturgy is filled with the mention of “am Yisroel,” or, “the nation of Israel.” Who comprises “the nation” of Israel? The twelve tribes. The convert is a “stranger.” Not the illegal immigrant — the convert.
- - -
So what explains jewish "race realist" Half Sigma's behavior? How can he be so acutely aware of his jewish heritage and yet unaware of its significance? What drives him to caricaturize and hate and wish to exclude "the Stormfronters" in the same way he mistakenly assumes "all" of "them" wish to do to jews? Why does he so desparately argue jews are "white", while he, like so many other jews, shows such a deep disrespect and disdain for Whites who disagree?
I think the cause is his jewishness. And I think this kind of thing isn't said more openly and more frequently because the West, or the White Gentile West to put it in terms Half Sigma might better understand, has become thoroughly judaized. After generations of effort by jewish-led intellectual and political movements, and more recently flipping into overdrive with the rise of mass media, and the aid of jewish influence in that media, any criticism of jews, even when they say the most hypocritical and self-serving things, is considered an egregious crime. To even say "you're only saying this crap because you're jewish" is considered "irrational" "jew-hate".
For this reason many jews have become accustomed to facing little or no opposition, which leads them to overreach, becoming more and more overbearing and openly hostile and resentful of Whites, revealing in their continuous and brazen arrogance and hypocrisy that they are not motivated by any principle or reason higher than "what's good for jews?"
- - -
I'll conclude with a few miscellaneous related items.
In Just Another Day (Part 2) Prozium points to Half Sigma's posts as just a small part of another typical day of jewish attacks on Whites. He also links to Ben Cohen at the Huffington Post who, big surprise, dictates MSNBC, Pull the Plug on Pat Buchanan. What is truly amazing is his reason why. It hinges on exactly the kind of pernicious race-based libels against Whites that jews are always so quick to see and denounce in any criticism of themselves:
When you consider the 6 million people the Germans managed to wipe out, there's not much the Jews couldn't take from Germany to make things right.Here's a rhetorical question for Half Sigma. Does Ben Cohen consider himself "white"? As I noted in Not the Last Brainwashing it certainly isn't uncommon for jews to peddle "blood libels" against Whites in the mainstream media. They're not even aiming at "the Stormfronters". They hate ordinary unsuspecting just-acting-natural White people.
White Europeans committed perhaps the biggest genocide in history when they came to the Americas. The native population was literally wiped off the land to make way for white settlers, and for those who managed to survive, a few crumbs were passed off to them decades later for their troubles.
White people transported millions of African slaves to the United States, subjected them to horrific treatment, murder and cultural annihilation. Blacks have only been treated as equal citizens in America since the 1960's, and the notion that centuries of enslavement, degradation and economic disenfranchisement could be reversed in a few decades is just laughable.
Every minority in America has suffered at the hands of white people. It is a country founded by white people, built by white people and controlled by white people. To pretend otherwise is akin to holocaust denial. It is a fact.
Attacks like this on Whites by "liberal" jews are commonplace. What causes me to believe the source is more jewish than "liberal" is that even "anti-liberal" jews like Lawrence Auster, pro-West half-jews like Takuan Seiyo, pro-"white" philo-semites like Ian Jobling, and half honest jewish-but-I-wanna-be-white race-realists like Half Sigma won't face a very simple fact:
The government and the mainstream media are staunchly anti-White, not anti-jewish. In fact an ever growing body of laws explicitly puts jews on a pedestal, whether they attend a synagogue or not. Laws and censorship curtailing "hate speech" are perpetrated and rationalized largely by jews whose first and foremost concern is to protect jews from criticism.
What these "race realist" faux-White dissemblers listed above have in common is their holier-than-thou insistence that they have every right to generalize about and criticize muslims, blacks, "the Stormfronters", or anybody else they wish, but consider it unacceptable to treat jews in the same way. Rather than openly proclaiming their pro-jewish sentiments, acknowledging and defending their double standards, and/or moving to israel to be with the people they love so much, they instead spend a great deal of effort doing exactly what "liberals" do, pretending to be "white" while directing hate toward anyone who acts White.
Labels: lawrence auster, onestdv, race, the undiscovered jew, white nationalism
Friday, 19 June 2009
Alex Jones is a shill for the Zionist machine. He misses no opportunity to divert attention away from his paymasters and onto long dead anti-internationalists, mainly but not exclusively, Germans.
Alex Jones has excelled himself in his latest lunatic offering on his site (infowars.com) with an article credited to Jurriaan Maessen, attacking the Green policies on the NSDAP. The article, "The Green Nazis: Environmentalism in the Third Reich" states that 'the Nazis were very much into environmentalism- not for environmentalism’s sake of course, but rather as a means of oppression and control.' According to Maessen, giving people cleaner air to breathe and better access to the forests and other areas of natural beauty was oppressive. By this logic, the Strength Through Joy initiative was designed not to give the workers holidays and better healthcare, but to make them less resistant to working!
The article continues: ‘The Nazis created nature preserves, championed sustainable forestry, curbed air pollution, and designed the autobahn highway network as a way of bringing Germans closer to nature.’ Several nationwide programs were initiated by the Nazis as a facade to cover their real plans. The first, ‘Beauty of Labour’, was created in 1934 to enhance the concept of a comfortable and pleasant workspace for the German worker. In the following year this ordinance was followed up by a ‘Reich Nature Protection Law’ to ensure the worker could walk through parks without worries....(How very sinister!)...But the hardcore environmentalists who had found their champion in the person of Adolf Hitler were soon to be disappointed. By the end of the 1930s, with a World War imminent, Hitler abandoned most of the environmental pretexts he had used to trick the masses, hook, line and sinker, replacing it with a war-ethos of sacrifice for the greater good and ‘lebensraum’.
Read that again - with War looming, environmental policies (such as breaking up the cities to favour a more agrarian existence) were abandoned. Well, of course they were! With the entire force of Organised Jewry against Germany and his allies, the march towards a healthier way of life by dismantling the un-natural and toxic industrialised society of the former plutocratic era, had to be put on hold. The vital matter of survival against the internationalist onslaught had to take priority. Had the European powers survived the Zionist war of aggression, implementation of the Green policies would have been resumed
What utter rubbish the propaganda of Alex Jones is. So the Germans had a policy of looking after the land, making it better for the people and animals, which the Globalists or our day are mimicking as an excuse to bring in a Global Tax? This therefore means that the crimes of the Zionist mafia being committed against US, are in truth really Nazi crimes?
Wait a minute Alex Jones. This is lunacy. Will you now suggest that those of us who oppose Vivisection are evil anti-Semites hell-bent on creating a One World State because the German regime of 1933-45 banned vivisection?
There were good aspects to the Third Reich, as well as bad. This simplistic view of all things ‘Nazi’ as evil, and all things anti-Nazi as good is the stuff of Hollywood, and should not be taken seriously by anyone who is not a very young child, or completely mentally subnormal.
You are a shill Alex Jones. By always focusing upon the German regime of over 60 years ago, you allow the Zionists who were victorious in the Second World War to continue their assault upon freedom. You divert the resistance movement into fighting ghosts, whilst the real enemy gains more power daily and realises the plans set forth in the Protocols of Zion.
Mr Jones - you are an enemy of humanity. You are the worst form of traitor. The other enemies get on with the job of enslaving us, as you put out disinfo and fear stories to confuse the opposition and lead them down a blind alley to the new Gulags. You are a sick man Mr Jones - a sick and corrupt man who has done more than anyone to help our oppressors whilst hiding behind crocodile tears.
You get rich selling lies and betraying those who trust you. You are the Judas of Texas.
In another article on the infowars site, the truth slips out about who is behind the NWO. The article describes how the Junker class built up the Nazis in order to create the opportunity for a Second World War and then used their power in the Army to sabotage the German war effort in order to usher in the New World Order from the ashes of the vanquished European nations?
How does this square with your Jonesy's statements that everything evil is the fault of the Nazis? It doesn't. The Nazis were manipulated by the Junkers in order to create a 'problem' which their Illuminati brethren could then 'react' to with War, leading to the 'solution' of the European Union under the control of the Bankers.
You've slipped up here Alex Judas, and admitted what those who don't wear the blinkers of AJ worship already know. The Monarchies are related by blood to the Rothschilds and are a part of the Global Illuminati family, which expresses itself politically as Zionism.
Thus you have for once told the truth - its not the Nazis who are behind the NWO, but those who they fought and who used and destroyed them - the Zionist mafia of Organised Jewry.
In response to the devotees of Alex the Judas who cannot bear to see their hero questioned, or to see Hitler as anything but the Devil himself, I write the following:
Alex Jones blames the visible puppets for the crimes of the hidden elite. He claims George Bush and his coterie committed the 9/11 massacre, but shys away from the involvement of MOSSAD. He makes the foolish statement that the PNAC were working to build an American Empire, whilst refusing to acknowledge that PNAC is Zionist through and through.
Similarly, Jones points to the Nazi regime as a German monster. He states that Prescott Bush funded the Nazis, but fails to pass on the information that Bush was merely a go between channeling money from the Warburgs/Rothschilds etc to the Nazis. Who were these bankers? Zionist Ashkenazim.
Obama, Bush, Hitler - puppets to a man. The real power is in the shadows.
Jones lies about the Illuminati. He makes the absurd statement that Adam Weishaupt was a German, and that the Illuminati was formed as a Germanic Death Cult. The Illuminati under Weishaupt plotted on Bavarian soil, but it was not German. Weishaupt was the son of a Rabbi.
At every turn, Jones hides the domination of the Ashkenazim. In the Second World War, the real Jews - the Sephardim - were butchered by people acting under the control of the Ashkenazim. Jones doesn't even differentiate between the Sephardim and the sick anti-humans who took over Palestine and now falsely call themselves Jews.
Jones works for the Ashkenazi agenda. He is a Zionist apologist. He consistently attacks the puppets put in place by Organised Jewry, but never attacks the hidden power itself.
Precisely because the Nazi movement was used as a tool to further Ashkenazi racism, to destroy Jews and Gentiles alike - precisely because Hitler was a patsy of the same ilk as Bush - the vicious evil Ashkenazi Zionist mafia must be exposed. Otherwise they cannot be stopped.
Jones has his infowarriors fighting shadows. The Nazis were a tool - the Zionist power used them to weaken Europe to pave the way for the Global Superstate. Without Zionist stooges such as Hitler, Stalin and Churchill, Europe would have remained a collection of strong free nations. Now the EU is a Zionist bloc which serves the Zionist will - exactly as planned by those who set up the Nazi regime and those who fought them.
Jones has proven his loyalties by consistently misleading the opposition. He is a Zionist stooge and an enemy of all who seek freedom. He must be exposed.
There is a great deal of unhealthy idolatry from Jones' supporters. He is a liar. No one could have carried out the Bohemian Grove infiltration in the way he did unless invited to do so. If he was a real threat he would be dead, or at least incarcerated on some trumped up charge - not getting fatter and richer selling his lies to people desperate to escape the coming 'prison planet'. He is a willing tool of our enemies, herding those who know something is wrong down a safe path of pointless resistance, opposing false and irrelevant enemies.
Hitler is dead. The Nazi movement is a fact of history. The real power continues through the Rothschilds and the Ashkenazi monarchs and aristocrats. Jones knows this but hides it - because he is one of their lackies. Wake up Infowarriors - your hero is an infiltrator placed in the movement to control you and mislead you so his paymasters can realise their goals unhindered.
Look at how Socialinfowars.com mysteriously ground to a halt and then folded when those of us who could see what Jones was doing began to make an impact. That couldn't be tolerated. Jones is a serious part of the problem and will remain so as long as decent people refuse to examine the reality of his message.
Opposing Zionism isn't anti-Semitic. Zionism is an Ashkenazi phenomenon. Ironically, those who suffer at the hands of the Ashkenazim include the Sephardim - the real Jews. Jones is a liar and a swindler and a Zionist asset. Do your own research. Then join with those of us who have awoken to the big lie and expose Jones and his collaborators.
Labels: Alex Jones, Climate, Hitler, New World Order
Thursday, 18 June 2009
Wednesday, 17 June 2009
Our wonderfully politically correct Bupkis Bolshevik Commisariat have been libelling the people of the UK once more. According to the BBC, the nasty people of Belfast have been conducting 'racist' attacks against poor innocent Romanians. See the story here.
Now, before anyone gets indignant about Irish yobs attacking our brothers and sisters from Romania, consider how ridiculous it is to describe attacking racial kinsmen as 'racist'! Something just doesn't ring true.
The BBC continue by giving news space for the lunatic rantings of such respectable characters as mass murderer Martyn McGuiness, and a rag bag collection of Orangemen - who are even more drenched in blood than their fellow Masons in the IRA. The false horror and outrage of these butchers is repeated by the odious pariahs of the establishment media here
The articles, which describe those opposing the presence of Romanians are refuted by the article printed in the Telegraph blog. the Telegraph point out that the people the BBC are presenting as Romanians are nothing of the sort. They are not the kinsmen of the great Codreanu, and are not in any way representative of the European people of that nation - they are 'Roma'.
So, what does the Telegraph mean by Roma? Does it mean the descendants of Asians from the Gujerat province of India? Or does it mean the workless scroungers who choose the workshy thieving lifestyle and are categorised alongside authentic Gypsies by the politically correct news makers? Or maybe they are Tinkers, Pikies,or any other breed of Diddicoys?
The BBC and the politicians who thrive on the anti-racist bandwagon make no distinction between genuine Gypsies and those who commit burglaries, muggings, and steal by begging, all the while living on dole money extracted from the tax-paying indigenous workers. Who are the racists here? Is it the local youths who, sick to the back teeth of thieves and criminals living the highlife, have finally decided enough is enough and have taken steps to move the parasites in their midsts away from their communities where they can prey on the local families? Or is it maybe the BBC, DUP, SF etc who make political capital from the natural response of the hard pressed people they purport to protect, by slandering them as 'haters'?
Answers to the real haters in the CRE, ADL & MI5
Labels: Immigration, Political Correctness, Westminster
Friday, 12 June 2009
Thursday, 11 June 2009
Royal loudmouth and wannabe King of Europe, Prince Charles, has opened his enormous mouth once more to give his subjects the benefit of his immense wisdom. Head of the Satanic Cult known as the Church of England, he not only divorced his wife, but also had her murdered. He has now turned his bloodlust on to Grey Squirrels.
In a letter to the Country Land and Business Association, Charles Saxe-Coburg-Gotha wrote of his desire to have all Grey Squirrels butchered. His rationale for this was that the Greys were destroying the habitats of the indigenous population of Red Squirrels. He argued that it was wrong for those who belonged to the land to be displaced by the newcomers. Oddly, this comes from a man who favours unlimited immigration of people, with all the mayhem this causes with the cultural and physical displacement the newcomers inflict on the indigenous people of this country (and the harm to the newcomers in being enticed by the false and unfulfillable promises of a better life).
For the lunatic prince, the welfare of people doesn't matter. He is quite happy to call himself 'defender of all faiths' and to play at dressing-up games in which he fawns over the people his family have brought to these shores. When it comes to animals, rather than suggesting humanely returning them to the lands from which they originated, he states his belief they should be slaughtered.
Should this desire for genocide bother us? After all, surely his hatred of Squirrels isn't that serious. Its not as if his family view us as animals to be butchered at will is it? Sadly, the Monarchy view us ordinary people exactly as verminous animals, to be destroyed and used as they see fit. The Royals are ardent internationalists. Through their lackies in such anti-human bodies as the Bilderberg Group and the Council om Foreign Relations, they have pushed for the globalisation of their tyranny. Through their banking connections in the Rothschild dynasty, the Royals have destroyed the spiritual focus of life which protected the people from absolute materialistic servitude.
One only has to look at the Georgia Guidestones to see where they are leading us. Charlie-boy is using the environmentalist cover story to condition people into accepting the global slave state. He speaks of butchering Squirrels, but it is humans who are his real target.
If the people were to follow the Prince's logic, then perhaps we could save our nation and rescue the embattled people of every nation. The Royals are the original parasites. they suck the lifeblood of the people, and in return spread their tyranny. The Royals are responsible for both World Wars, for the destruction of the unity of the British people by persecuting and murdering the Irish through their 'protestant' cult. If there is any justice in the world, then perhaps one day Prince Charles will see his desire for the extermination of destructive parasites fulfilled: starting with the source of the evil in this land - the Royal Family itself.
Labels: Animal Welfare, Immigration, Monarchy, New World Order
Tuesday, 9 June 2009
The British people are heartily sick of the establishment parties who have sold their country to the Rothschilds’ banking cartel, and their masters. The election of BNP and UKIP MEPs and the support for anti-EU parties is evidence of the mood of the nation. This has been mirrored across the European Union, with liberal-materialist fanatics being rejected by the ordinary people. The calibre of the new MEPs and the parties they belong to will be revealed in due course. What is certain is that with fewer integrationists in the Parliament, the battle for freedom from the new Soviet Empire has received a much-needed boost.
We now have the opportunity to build upon this backlash against the EU tyrants. Electing Sovereignty-defending MEPs is just one part of the struggle. We need to increase the pressure on the Fabian architects of the EU, and mobilise the many concerned citizens in the European Union, into an active and lawful resistance.
In Great Britain, the process of building a legal resistance to those who see us as cattle has been undermined by egocentric megalomaniacs whose desire to be ‘big fish in little pools’ has exceeded their desire to help to free their nation from those who have reduced it to a slave state. In addition to this, the grouping together of individuals into political parties has been met with establishment-controlled infiltrators and agents-provocateur wrecking the groups and thus stifling any effective opposition.
The use of emotional epithets such as ‘racist’ to describe anyone who oppose the destruction of the culture, traditions and ethnic homogeneity of the countries which make up the British Isles, has led many well-meaning people into the clutches of the anti-racist movements, which are nothing but fronts for the internationalist agenda. Years of conditioning through the media and the indoctrination system which masquerades as education, has led to some individuals reacting in a Pavlovian manner whenever the idea is raised of defending Great Britain. The constant repetition of holocaust propaganda has worked to make a substantial proportion of the indigenous population react with anger when it is suggested that maybe, the indigenous population deserves better than to be merged into a rootless identity free mass of consumers to be exploited by the Mammonist international cabal. This has put the pro-Sovereignty political formations on the defensive, with the resultant excessive focus on exposing the holocaust lie merely creating more hysteria in the anti-racist camp. This has led to activists being bogged down in battles against one another leaving the internationalist free reign to push forward their agenda.
There has to be another way to the failed party game. What we need is to mobilise individuals to use their own skills to attack the EU monster by spreading information and waking people up in their own communities. On Saturday 13th June, there will be a meeting in London, organised by the British Constitution Group, to help arm the attendees with the knowledge they need to mobilise their friends and neighbours. The aim is to get one million Britons out of their TV-induced hypnotic trance state and out into the streets, campaigning to free our lands from the banksters and their fellow travellers. Surely this is a worthy strategy. Everyone who is able to travel to London, and has the funds to get a ticket to this event, would be well advised to do so. If you can’t go yourself, then speak to friends who can, and share the information garnered by them. The EU has taken a blow. Were it not for the contrived vote splitting, then the Labour Government would be so embarrassed at the scale of its defeat, then we would probably now be on the verge of a General election, and potentially within grasp of a referendum to get us out of the EU altogether.
The momentum won’t last long if we don’t actively build on the recent victory over the old system. Get involved in any way you can. Support the actions of the British Constitution Group – this is an initiative which has real potential. Visit their site for information and tickets at:
http://www.thebcgroup.org.uk/
Labels: Agents Provocateur, EU vs UK, New World Order, Tactics, The Law
Monday, 8 June 2009
The majority of the results of the European Parliamentary Elections are now in. Across Europe there has been a swing from the liberal-socialist parties to the traditionalists. The votes have shown a clear wish of the ordinary people to halt the liberal experiment, to restore traditional Nations, to reverse the anti-family, anti-moral, anti-human policies which have been forced upon the people by the ruling parties across the EU bloc.
In the United Kingdom, the establishment parties have lost out to those that oppose further European integration. In Scotland, the Scottish National Party has built upon its standing in the Scottish Parliament by sending MEPs to Europe. In Wales, Plaid Cymru have been joined by UKIP in sending representatives that reject the status quo. Across the UK, parties that oppose the corrupt cesspool of Westminster have done well. The Labour-Conservative-Liberal beast has lost out across the UK, and in England this has resulted in UKIP and BNP representatives being elected to Bruxelles.
Looking at the percentages of votes cast, and how these have translated into seats, it can be clearly seen that the head-to-head battle between the BNP and UKIP has split the anti-EU vote and allowed the parties of the establishment back into Parliament. If the BNP or UKIP really cared about the people of Britain, they would have come to an arrangement not to fight in each other’s strongholds. That they did fight one another shows that they put party above people. The promise of lavish expenses obviously was a higher pull than principles.
The reaction of the establishment to the election of BNP MEPs has been predictable and only served to highlight the anti-democratic reality of British politics. The scenes of top flight MPs condemning the people of Yorkshire and the Northwest are reminiscent of the condemnation meted out to the people of Tower Hamlets when they democratically elected the BNP’s first Councillor, Derek Beacon, in 1993. Then, as now, establishment party leaders were rolled out to hiss abuse at the electorate for voting for parties of their own choosing. The usual epithet of ‘far right’ and ‘extremist’ ahs been hurled against the BNP by the liberal-fabian extremists who have worked ceaselessly to destroy this nation for the benefit for international finance.
In the UK, to oppose the destruction of one’s own country, to oppose the domination of humanity by finance, and to oppose the creed of soul-less materialism is to be ‘undemocratic’. Thus speaks the real voice of the rulers. You can vote for anyone they allow you to vote for!
There are many problems with the BNP. They are a pro-Zionist party, with policies, which ape the establishment. They have an image of being anti-immigrant, which no longer matches up with the reality of the post-Tyndall party. Under the auspices of Nick Gri££in, the BNP has become a Nationalist party in name only, serving the interests of its Zionist financers. Yet still it is the target of abuse by the establishment. This is the oldest trick in the book.
The BNP are being set up as the opposition to the Westminster gang. They will gain popularity until the many expense scandals racking the BNP are exposed. Then they will be destroyed in the media, and alongside them, all who are labelled ‘Nationalist’ by virtue of opposing subjugation to the European Soviet, will suffer. The Bruxelles regime will use laws against ‘Xenophobia’ to crush campaigns for independence, claiming they are ‘hateful’ and likely to incite violence (rather than measures to prevent violence which is inevitable in nations which have lost their cultural and ethnic homogeneity).
Will the new MEPs use their influence to bring the Parliament down and thus remove one of the pillars of the Zionist machine? Or will they sit there idly chatting and debating as the Sovietisation of Europe is completed, leaving the Parliament as a chamber not dis-similar to the talking shop of the Kremlin in the days before the Soviet Union moved westwards? Judging by how the British politicians have crawled over each other in order to get their snouts in the EU trough, the chances that they will put Nation above self are not good. Maybe our brothers and sisters on the European mainland will be more principled. We will find out soon enough, whether we will return to life in the warmth of freedom, or suffer the brutal cold of the prison state being built for us.
Thursday, 4 June 2009
Today, the 4th June 2009, swathes of seats are being contested for election to the Parliament of the European Union. Across the Union, 350 million people are eligible to vote. In England, there are a mass of parties fighting for their ticket to join the gravy train and live the high life at the expense of the increasingly impoverished tax-payer. So, what should we make of this current exercise in manipulated mobocracy?
The real seat of power in the European Union resides in the European Commission, or to be precise, in the people behind the scenes, who control the Commission. Thus, the elections to the Parliament are really an irrelevance. The Parliament functions as pantomime show for the entertainment of the masses. It is in reality a diversion to keep those who oppose the despotism and corruption of the new Soviet, focused upon a symptom of the malaise, and away from its root cause.
The EU is on the verge of pushing through the Constitution, which is being ratified by National, rather than Federal Governments. The representatives sent to the European Parliament will have no say on whether the Constitution is ratified. Groups such as the Green Party who favour European Federalism, or the UKIP who favour National Self-determination, can only argue in the talking shops in Strasburg and Bruxelles. So long as the European Commission and the State Governments act in unison, the Constitution will be ratified and the Superstate will be finalised as a single bloc, to be merged at a later date as part of the One World Government.
Why then, if the Parliament is a toothless body, then is so much media focus being placed on the elections? Why? Precisely because it is an irrelevance. Should focus fall upon the Commission, and the banking cartel who act to finance the hidden rulers of the EU, then the possibility would arise of the power structure they have built being threatened. By focusing their controlled media on the sideshow of their creation, the ruling cabal ensure that real opposition is strangled in its infancy, and precious financial and human resources are wasted on attaining positions of influence in an institution which has been designed to contain and diffuse any real counter power.
The Parliamentary elections, regardless of the powerless nature of the Parliament itself, do serve to act as a barometer of popular opinion across the Union. To that extent they are worthy of attention. The number of parties competing to get their people into the Parliament is indicative of the problem of party politics. The European Parliament is notorious for its corruption – rivalling even the theft and squandering of taxpayers’ money of its counterpart in Great Britain. Those who realise the true nature of the Parliament but still fight elections, do so in order to get their snouts in the trough. Those who genuinely believe they can make a difference by being elected, display a profound naïveté and ignorance of the reality of ‘democratic’ politics in the proto-globalist era.
The success of the diversionary tactic, and the desperation of well meaning party activists to do something to stop the EU juggernaut can be seen in the number of Parties standing in the current elections.
For example, the parties contesting the Yorkshire Region, listed HERE
In England, the pro-EU parties include the Greens, and Socialist Labour who are internationalist in aspiration and favour passing power to the United Nations. Against these parties are the Christians, who oppose the Islamification of the EU, especially with the imminent accession of Turkey to the EU, and a range of parties advocating self-determination outside the EU, which we shall briefly look at below:
These anti-EU parties include the English Democrats, British National Party, United Kingdom Independence Party and No2EU.
If one momentarily accepts the propaganda that the elections matter, then the range of anti-EU parties who are competing AGAINST one another, is an indictment of the parties themselves. Rather than coming to an agreement to not split the vote, these parties have stood in direct competition against one another. Were they seriously concerned with the best interests of the Nation, they would have thrashed out such an agreement. By not doing so they have put party politics above the people. This is despicable.
The English Democrats are wasting their finances in fighting in the EU elections. Their campaign for an independent England, free from the United Kingdom - the tyrannical imperialistic plaything of the Royal Family – is a worthy enough campaign. However, they would be better-placed contesting seats in the Westminster elections. A cursory glance at the liberal multi-cultural make up and polices of the English Democrats puts the lies to them being for an English England. Alongside this safety valve we have the No2EU group which is avowedly pro-immigrant. Their programme argues for a UK free from the EU but with open borders to the world. This is lunacy.
Then we have the BNP which under the leadership of Nick Gri££in has transformed itself into a Westminster style party, complete with corruption, fraud, financial scandal, flip-flop policies and adherence to all things Zionist – hardly a positive party which could be considered able to save anyone form the EU, and if anything, party most worthy of being labelled as seeking election in order to gain money for self gratification of the party elite. For analysis of the BNP's slide into the sewer of populism and its twists and turns in the service of international plutocracy, visit Final Conflict.
Finally We have UKIP. Perhaps this is the best of a bad bunch. At least Nigel Farage is active in promoting withdrawal from the EU, and not merely confining his efforts to attacking his rivals. However, with the EDP, BNP and No2EU parties fielding candidates against the UKIP, the anti-EU vote is certain to be split, which when added to the tendency for votes to be ‘lost’ and miscounted (especially postal votes), could see the groundswell of anti-EU feeling being translated into pro-EU candidates being elected.
I would not normally advocate voting, but I would suggest that today, every EU citizen should support the pro-freedom party in his or her Nation which is most likely to win. In England that means voting UKIP. Parliament is a fraud, but sending a clear signal of opposition to the integration agenda by returning parties opposed to EU integration would be at least slow the pace of integration. Not voting is to send the message that we the people are happy to let the despots continue unopposed.
We are truly living in an Alice in Wonderland false reality, where what we are told to believe is as far removed from what is real as is possible to imagine. The EU Parliament is a toothless safety valve, but our best hope in defeating the Leviathan of the EU is to actually vote in an election to its own institution. This is perversely to recognise and legitimise the Parliament, and thus to strengthen the EU itself. We are ensnared in a web so sophisticated that it is hard to imagine its full extent. The more we struggle to free ourselves, the tighter the grip we seek release from.
So what is our best option? If we vote we give our tacit approval of the body to which we the victors of the election will be returned. If we don't vote, then our lack of involvement will be used to signal a lack of opposition to the EU. Either way, the EU wins.
I would urge everyone to seriously consider his or her options. The game is rigged. We have to seek out the lesser of two evils. That is to partake in this diabolical charade and to vote. In the UK, the UKIP is the least bad choice - the BNP, No2EU and English Democrats are as thoroughly rotten as the establishment parties (Labour, Conservative and Labour), and the other parties are so internationalist their only objection to the EU is it isn't globalist enough!
Much as it goes against my inner beliefs, the situation we are in is so grave that I urge everyone to go to the polls and vote. By so doing we may stall the march to the global superstate, by forcing a slowing of the rush to total European Soviet Union. This may buy us some time - time to strike for freedom for all nations and the dismantling of the EU. Indeed, if enough people vote for anti-EU parties then the resulting delegates could vote the Parliament out of existence. This, of course, assumes that the powers-that-be would allow delegates they do not control to be elected. We have to take a leap of faith and trust that there may be some decent politicians campaigning to get into Government in order to dismantle the Parliament, and not merely to get fat enjoying the abundant spoils to which they will have access. Should enough people of such a high calibre be elected, then the focal point of the EU would face exposure for the talking shop it is, and better still its own demise. Now that WOULD be a significant blow against the European slave state.
Vote!
Labels: EU vs UK, Immigration, Monarchy, Party Politics, Tactics
Wednesday, 3 June 2009
Just in advance of election day in Britain both the political and media wings of the anti-White regime have pulled out all the stops in their reality-inverting propaganda. Discarding their masks as sober statesmen and unbiased journalists, as well as their usual lip-service in support of democracy, they are shamelessly, hypocritically resorting to the most extreme and prejudicial language to gin up fear and loathing against those they accuse and condemn for doing the same.
They're projecting their own guilty minds of course. The difference between the BNP and the anti-White bastards in control is that the BNP don't currently control anything. It is the anti-White anti-BNP forces who have made all the failing policies and who control and censor all the established megaphones with iron fist.
The thrust of the anti-BNP propaganda campaign is that voters should fear what the BNP might be and might do, even though much of the scare-mongering is fabricated from whole cloth. Repeated often enough they hope their snide smears will make White voters forget what they can see with their own eyes: the imported anti-White hate and violence wreaking havoc all around them, and the traitorous leaders who brought it, rejoice in it, and have themselves attacked native Britons in order to defend it.
If any part of what I'm writing seems like an exaggeration, review for yourself the media's own product.
Go to the polls to fight BNP hate, The Guardian, 2 June 2009:
We love Britain precisely because of its tolerance and diversity. The British National party and its allies are a threat to everything that makes us proud of this country we love. The BNP is working hard to conceal its extremism because it knows that people in Britain totally reject the politics of racism and hatred.This statement, signed by Prime Minister Gordon Brown, amounts to: "We love aliens more than we love native Britons, it is the aliens who make Britain great." With native leaders like this, who needs alien enemies?
Voters urged not to support BNP in poll, Alex Forsyth, Portsmouth Today, 2 June 2009:
Fears have been raised that the far-right party could win seats on Hampshire and West Sussex county councils because voters have lost faith in mainstream parties.Fears are being raised alright. By the media. Only in far-wacko minds is the simple act of voting your interests considered "far-right".
Europe braces for extremist gains in elections, Paisley Dodds, The Associated Press, 2 June 2009:
In some of Manchester's bleakest neighborhoods where unemployment is rife and anxiety about an immigration influx is palpable, one of Prime Minister Gordon Brown's worst fears is unfolding before Thursday's European Union elections.More rhetoric of fear.
The British National Party, which doesn't allow nonwhites as members and is against membership in the European Union, is gaining ground in former Labour Party strongholds that once threw their support behind Brown and his predecessor, Tony Blair.
Most anti-BNP articles won't even admit that reaction to the regime's support for genocidal immigration is a well-spring of support for the BNP. This article does but inverts reality, painting opposition to genocide as "extremist". The suggestion is that the BNP incites racial hatred, though the reality is that mass immigration bringing in other races is the more proximate cause.
Shameful day if BNP wins seat, says David Miliband, James Kirkup, Telegraph, 3 June 2009:
Mr Miliband, whose Jewish father fled Belgium before the Nazi invasion, added: "This is the country that flew the flag of freedom against fascism in the 1940s.David Miliband has no ground on which to stand. He should be ashamed for trying to shame native Britons for voting their own interests in their own homeland. He should bugger off to Belgium, or better, to israel, if he doesn't like that the British people today still wish to defend their homeland from being overrun by outsiders as their forefathers did. That was, after all what the Battle of Britain and the larger carnage of World War II was about, wasn't it? Or was it all, then and now, really about doing what's best for jews? Miliband's idea of shame assumes the latter.
"It will be a day of shame if we send fascists to the European Parliament."
Why you should not vote for the BNP, Kevin Maguire, mirror.co.uk, 3 June 2009:
The extremist BNP are thick, as well as nasty, thugs.
Please don't be conned into voting for this vile, racist, incompetent mob tomorrow.This is a prime specimen of the kind of pure hypocrisy published by major media outlets. Though it is an opinion/editorial rather than "journalism", it's easy to see how the one colors the other. No major media outlet would publish a similarly worded piece about any other political party, never mind anything like the continuous stream of vile, nasty, thuggish "opinion" aimed at smearing the BNP.
BNP bigots are racist AND sexist, Fiona Phillips, mirror.co.uk, 2 June 2009:
As a Briton, enjoying our rich and diverse country. As a mother, wondering what future my children will grow up in.And don't forget, they beat their spouses, molest children, lay about, and drink blood too! The media really knows no bounds when it comes to smearing anyone who stands up for White interests.
And as a woman, because the BNP isn't just a racist, homophobic, xenophobic party, it's a sexist party too. Whatever they pretend, they just aren't a normal party.
Even if any of the trash talk is true, the BNP's saving grace is that they aren't guilty of genocide. They don't want Britain flooded with surly hostile aliens. They're against that. So if it's really all about your children then stopping the genocide should be your first priority. If you favor the aliens, well then be honest, for you it's really all about their children, isn't it?
Racist campaigning for BNP, Chris Osuh, Manchester Evening News, 2 June 2009:
A CONVICTED racist is boasting about his leading role in the British National Party's campaign to win votes in this week's European elections.Astounding. The media normally (see Miliband's comment above) see self-righteous speech that puts jews on a pedestal as virtuous, but here they've managed here to turn it into racist hate. It's amazing to see the kind of contradictions created when all pretense at being consistent is discarded, except the rock solid consistent hatred for Whites standing up for their interests.
Roy West, from Dukinfield, pleaded guilty to racial harassment at Tameside Magistrates' Court in February after telling his German next-door neighbour to 'go back to Krautland and kill some more Jews.'
How BNP tries to hide its racist core, Harry Underwood, The First Post, 2 June 2009:
The BNP claims to have modernised, but its championing of British jobs for British people cannot hide its insistence that its members are whiteHide? The BNP is quite open about who they represent. You'll find it in their Mission Statement:
The British National Party exists to secure a future for the indigenous peoples of these islands in the North Atlantic which have been our homeland for millennia.It's the first thing anyone who's at all curious about the BNP find out. Logically a party so organized would restrict membership to the very people it purports to represent. It is not morally or ethically wrong, nor is it hidden.
We use the term indigenous to describe the people whose ancestors were the earliest settlers here after the last great Ice Age and which have been complemented by the historic migrations from mainland Europe.
Accusations otherwise are the projections of people who hide their hatred for Whites behind a false love of aliens.
Denial is opening the door to the extremists, Alice Miles, Times Online, 3 June 2009:
These were not skinhead thugs that I met on Monday. We should not stand, fingers in ears, pretending that such views do not exist on some of the ordinary housing estates of Britain.Some anti-BNP articles are more subtle, being aimed at the regime's thought-leaders rather than voters. This one admits the "hate" rhetoric isn't working, arguing against pretense that it is, while pretending that the regime has simply not been listening. The reality is that the regime has been actively squelching and pathologizing any and all dissent to their genocidal policies on immigration and "diversity".
The regime is far more likely to continue its denial, to the point of denying legitimacy to the BNP by outlawing opposition to immigration. To accept opposition to immigration would be a dangerous step toward admitting past wrong-doing. To do that, when the wrong-doing is genocide, would be suicidal, and the regime knows it. Those at the top are not in any way noble enough to stand down now.
BNP eyes 'seismic' breakthrough, BBC News, 2 June 2009:
The BNP was on course to win a seat in the North West, [Spokesman Simon Darby] said, and attract up to 12% of the vote in some regions.Native Britons on the fence should clearly see who their enemy is by comparing the hysterical anti-BNP smears and slander passed off by the media as news and opinon with the language used and positions taken by The British National Party itself.
Mr Darby said BNP candidates attracted unparalleled hostility from the media, campaigners, celebrities and other political parties - who accuse it of being racist and divisive - but said the election of a BNP MEP would "change the rules of the game".
Here are the anti-BNP headlines above gathered together to better illustrate the poison the media is trying to place in every readers' mind:
Go to the polls to fight BNP hate
Voters urged not to support BNP in poll
Europe braces for extremist gains in elections
Shameful day if BNP wins seat, says David Miliband
Why you should not vote for the BNP
BNP bigots are racist AND sexist
Racist campaigning for BNP
How BNP tries to hide its racist core
Denial is opening the door to the extremists
Labels: anti-white, bnp, britain, europe, media