Beullogeo's

Turn on the Radio or Television, open a Newspaper, and you will be bombarded by stories about the outbreak of Swine Flu which, you will be told, is set to devastate the planet, killing millions. What is the reality? Well, as anyone who cares to look a little more deeply into the world around them than just accepting the official version of events will already suspect, the stories and reality are very different. The propaganda is designed to instill fear and unthinking panic. Take a deep breath, step back from the illusion being pushed by the establishment media and you will see that events are worlds apart from what we are being told.

According to the mass media, as of yesterday, 29th April, over 150 people have died worldwide of Swine Flu. However, this has been rejected by the World Health Organisation, which has recorded just 7 deaths. Vivienne Allan, of the WHO Patient Safety Programme stated on ABC Radio (29.4.9):

“Unfortunately that [150-plus deaths] is incorrect information….That figure is not a figure that’s come from the World Health Organisation and, I repeat, the death toll is seven and they are all from Mexico.”

The WHO has confirmed a total of 89 cases worldwide - 40 in the Latin America, 26 in Mexico, 6 in Canada, 2 in Spain, 2 in Great Britain and 3 in New Zealand. The 7 fatalities are included within the figures for Mexico. The 2 people in Britain with flu are classed as not being seriously ill, but rather a bit poorly.

So, what is this ‘Swine Flu’ which we are all being conditioned to be terrified of?

According to the Centre for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), Swine Flu is an influenza type A H1N1 virus which although unpleasant for pigs, rarely transfers to humans, and in the cases where it does, this only occurs where people are in very close proximity to the animals. Thus, a pig farmer would be at much greater risk than a town dweller, and then only at high risk should he be in intimate contact with the porker. The flu is not transmitted person-to-person. Living conditions in the affected region of Mexico cannot be considered comparable to conditions in Europe, or for that matter in the rest of Mexico. Although death does occur with influenza, this is incredibly rare. In the overwhelming majority of cases, symptoms are similar to the common cold and are best dealt with by isolating oneself and resting. The media scare-mongering is just that.

Alongside the irresponsible reporting of the media, who will repeat any salacious lie in order to sell their product, politicians are jumping on the misery and fear bandwagon. EU health commissioner, Androulla Vassiliou issued a warning on Monday 25th April against travelling to North and Central America. The British Foreign Office followed suit . The motive behind politicians issuing edicts is to reinforce the fear factor by giving the media a level of official governmental backing. Many people who are inclined to treating the media with a pinch of salt are less cynical when it comes to the Government. The much vaunted use of the so-called Cobra Committee is nothing but an instrument of psychological warfare.

The Swine Flu scare is just another in a series of contrived panics. In 1995-97 Britain had the BSE scare. We were told that up to 10 million Britons would be infected and die of a horrendous debilitating sickness. The nation’s farms were decimated as entire herds of cattle were slaughtered and farms forced to sell out to property developers and international businesses. The millions of dead Britons are still alive and uninfected. The BSE scare was more of a BSE scandal. The mass sickness did not occur, but the mass slaughter of cattle was real, as was the impact upon the farming communities.

The BSE travesty was followed a year later by the scare that Sheep were now infected. They were not. This did not stop the senseless butchery of millions of Sheep. The result of this was the destruction of the meat industry in Britain, with the ridiculous situation of foreign livestock being imported into the country, causing great suffering to the animals, and great cost to the consumer. The end of British self sufficiency and the on going reliance upon imports is of course part of the Globalist agenda of interdependency on all commodities, including food.

In 2003 there was the Sars outbreak in Asia. Dr Patrick Nixon was rolled out to give scientific credence to the lunacy that the Sars outbreak would kill at least a quarter of the population of Great Britain. How many died, or even were infected? Zero, Nil, None, No one at all.

In 2006 we had the Bird Flu non-epidemic. The 1 in 4 Britons who were predicted to die, did not. The ‘first pandemic of the twentyfirst century’ was nothing of the sort. Millions of birds were slaughtered, but there were no human fatalities. The murder of the wildlife was sickening, and pointless.

Now we are told that Swine Flu will kill hundreds of millions of people worldwide. Already we are witnessing the mass slaughter of pigs and the destruction of the Pig Farming Industry in many countries. Swine Flu is another scare like Avian (Bird) Flu, Sars and BSE.

Why would the Government make such a ‘mistake’ as to spread fear and panic which will result in the further erosion of the national self-reliant farming community. ? Why? In order to tighten the Globalist noose and make any chance of national self determination and self sufficiency much more difficult.

The Government (as agents of the Globalist agenda) are not the only ones to benefit from the Swine Flu scandal. Pharmaceutical companies are set to make a fortune in selling un-needed and harmful drugs to the bewildered and terrified populations across the globe. They are manipulating a non event in order to make profit. This is economic and chemical terrorism.

The worst aspect of all this is that alongside the senseless slaughter of animals, the gullible and cowed masses who accept the vaccinations against this spectral pandemic will be unwittingly weakening their immune systems, so should real flu come, they will be less able to fight it.

Then, as a result of the mass vaccinations, many people will die. The Globalists and the Pharmaceutical Companies will have achieved their aims – power and profits – whilst ordinary people suffer, and animals are destroyed for no reason. This is the level of sickness and insanity which our rulers have reached.

Protect your families. Refuse the Vaccination. Protect the animals and the farming communities - expose this disgusting lie. There is no Swine Flu epidemic.

In "Greenspan to testify on immigration" Steve Sailer wrote:

The Open Boarders (sic) crowd isn't even trying to make sense these days, are they?

My comment got lost/filtered:

In identifying them, "Genocidal Immigrationists" comes closer to the truth. For example, with that understanding of their intent, their nonsense makes perfect sense.

When something doesn't make sense it's often because you're view is distorted or incomplete. But sometimes it's willful. Sailer himself likes to call attention to and ridicule this kind of willful ignorance, categorizing his observations under "political correctness makes you stupid".

Recognizing that many of the wealthy, intelligent, educated, and well-informed progressivist globalist administrators of the world actively perpetrate genocide and many more acquiesce to and abet it is apparently something Sailer finds too dangerous to permit his commentariat to try and deride or dispute.

Then again, maybe Blogger just dropped my comment.

- - -

There has been no substantial criticism of Genocidal Immigrationists, though the accusation is quite explicit. Beside the relatively light volume of visitors here I attribute this mainly to the accusation's validity. At best the most ardent supporters of mass immigration simply don't care who suffers the consequences, and at worst they intend them. Their justification usually hinges on claims that immigration is profitable overall. When they respond to those who object it is only to smear us as losers, haters, or some combination of the two - another sign of their bad faith and ill will.

I learned only recently from a post at Majority Rights titled ‘La Loi’ de Frédéric Bastiat that there's an old name for the mendacity I had long noticed genocidal immigrationists indulging in, particularly those of the economist persuasion. It's called the Broken Window Fallacy, which is the idea that any economic activity whatsoever is more desirable than none. For example, when our genocidalist administrators permit thousands of aliens to flood into our countries to the point that they overload our schools, hospitals, courts, prisons, housing, utilities and roads we shouldn't see that as bad. No, it's a wonderful boon. We're so very lucky because it means lots of jobs and increases the globalist economist's holiest of holies, the Gross Domestic Product. Never mind that the lives and efforts of some of our finest men and women end up flowing down a rat hole or into aiding those who hate us.

Globalism is in essence a world-scale pyramid scheme. It can only exist because the kind of economic wisdom contained in Bastiat's essay What Is Seen and What Is Not Seen has for too long not been seen.

- - -

In their initial responses to the Swine Flu various globalist mouthpieces again reveal their genocidal motivations, falling over themselves as they have not to calm the public, or to announce measures that would slow or blunt the impact of the outbreak. No. Instead their first reactions have been to announce loudly and clearly that closing borders and restricting travel would most definitely NOT happen - and that only xenophobes and nativist loser-haters who would think such measures might help. Of course if your main concern is continuing to flood the West with third worlders, then an outbreak of infectious disease isn't important to you except as a threat to trade and travel.

Here's one typical example from Monday:

Swine Flu Border Closures are Political, WHO Says

Travel restrictions under consideration by the U.S. to prevent the spread of a new flu virus may be influenced by politics more than science, the World Health Organization’s chief said today.

WHO doesn’t recommend closing borders or restricting the movement of people or goods, Margaret Chan, director-general of the United Nations agency told leaders from health groups around the world in a conference call today. The disease, which may have caused more than 100 deaths and sickened more than 1,000 people, has spread too far and would be impossible to contain by closing borders, she said.

“By definition, pandemic influenza will move around the world,” Chan said in the call today. “Does that mean we are going to close every country? Does that mean we are going to bring the world’s economy to a standstill?

“We know from past experience that transmission of influenza or the spread of new influenza disease would not be stopped by closing borders and would not be stopped by restricting movement of people or goods,” Chan said.

Note the numerous hysterical exaggerations. "Impossible to contain", "every country", "bring the world’s economy to a standstill". Note also the inversion in the headline. It is WHO who is driven by politics more than science. The fact is that the rate and extent of the spread of an epidemic is directly related to the frequency and intimacy of contact among people. Reducing interaction slows the rate of infection, stretching it over time, reducing the severity of the impact (so all the cops, firefighters, doctors, and nurses aren't sick at once) and making it more likely medicine can be produced and distributed.

I don't think a world-class executive like Chan or her advisors fail to understand this. Instead it seems they are motivated by different priorities that override any such understanding.

Travel to Asia plunged during in the 2002-2003 outbreak of severe acute respiratory disease, or SARS.

SARS, which killed 770 people, reduced passenger air traffic 19 percent in Asia and 8.2 percent worldwide. Malaysia shut its borders to travelers from China and Hong Kong, and other countries instituted health checks at airports and borders. The U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention discouraged travel to some affected countries and said it might screen travelers in a bird flu epidemic.

“When we talk about travel advisories, we cannot think of the old days when we were dealing with SARS,” Chan said today. “It’s a totally different ballgame now.”

Calling 2002-2003 "the old days" and claiming the SARS outbreak is "totally different" is a transparently lame attempt to deny that closing borders and reducing travel might help. "Who cares how many people die", seems to be the thinking.

- - -

Contrast the current reaction with the reaction of the US government in 1976 to a single death from Swine Flu. Advisors feared a pandemic because "[t]he virus isolated at Fort Dix is antigenically related to the influenza virus which has been implicated as the cause of the 1918-1919 pandemic which killed 450,000—more than 400 out of every 100,000 Americans":

Then President Ford, on the same March 24, 1976, only one day after his surprise loss to Ronald Reagan in the North Carolina Republican presidential primary, announced on national television his recommendation to the American public for a crash nation-wide influenza vaccination program to include “every man, woman and child.” Congress responded promptly to the president’s call for funds (appropriations were voted by the Senate April 9, by the House April 12, and signed into law April 15, 1976). Vaccine was produced, field tested, and evaluated in April, May and June. There were problems with producing the vaccine. Nevertheless, between October 1 and December 16, 1976, the U.S. Public Health Service, through state and local public health department “public sector providers,” rapidly spread out among the citizenry to successfully vaccinate 85% of 40 million voluntary vaccinees in 10 weeks (the other 15% of the 40 million voluntary vaccinees received their vaccinations from “private sector providers”).

It seems we're heading for something closer to a repeat of 1918 than 1976.

- - -

This morning I was listening to NPR and was quite surprised to hear the commentator declare that the common thread in the outbreak so far was a connection to Mexico.

A minute later they mentioned that the israeli health minister found the word swine offensive to jews and muslims and suggested calling it mexican flu instead, which offended mexicans. That made me laugh quite a bit, though I sobered up when I realized it's only a matter of time before the selfless advocates for all "people of color" decide to call it White flu and blame blue-eyed people for engineering it. Nobody will care if that causes us any offense.

- - -

In "Swine flu" Sailer writes:

Some people are puzzled as to how human, pig, and bird strains of the flu have mixed together, but if you have spent any time in rural Mexico the answer is obvious: these creatures all live together in close quarters.

Commenter El Caudillo quotes this and suggests a more accurate term would be mestizo flu. I didn't bother testing if Sailer would permit a comment suggesting genocidal globalist flu is even more accurate. Ben Tillman said as much in a subtle way:

It's the evolution of virulence through horizontal transmission. Immigration policy is designed to foster such increased virulence.

Indeed, that's the science of it. Obviously the politics are instead driven by what is financially and biologically profitable for the mendacious few at the tip of the pyramid. The rest of us be damned.

As a true englishman, it is my duty to uphold the values of my land. Therefore I feel I must comply with the request by the Government that I report terrorists wherever I find them.

I would like to report a certain Anthony Blair, formerly employed as Prime Minister of the United Kingdom plc (a subsidiary of the Rothschilds New Jerusalem Global consortium), and formerly resident at 11 Downing Street, London, current whereabouts unknown, presently employed as spokesman for the Zionist Cartel as crusader for war with Iran and related duties in the service of Greater Israel, with prospects for becoming Vozhd of the new Soviet Union in Strasburg/Bruxelles.

Mr Blair is a member of a terrorist gang who have organised and financed a series of terrorist attrocities, including the 11th September 2001 New York World Trade Centre bombing, and the subsequent bombings in London, Madrid, Bali amongst other targets. Perhaps the worst terrorist atrocities of this cartel have been the massacres in Jugoslavija, Afghanistan, Iraq, Sudan, Panama, and many other nations. Hiding behind the front of NATO, the US-UK Coalition Forces, and the War on Terror, this coalition is responsible for the murder of in excess of 1 million Iraqi civilians through bombing and starvation warfare, and millions more globally through terrorist campaigns including pharmaceutical/biological warfare (AIDS, Ebola, Vaccinations) as well as military assaults and disruption of food supplies (Monsanto, IMF). The numbers already murdered run into many millions, with a further 7,000 million targeted as boasted in the Georgia Guidestones - effectively their war manifesto and Ten Satanic Commandments as listed below:

1. Maintain humanity under 500,000,000 in perpetual balance with nature.
2. Guide reproduction wisely - improving fitness and diversity.
3. Unite humanity with a living new language.
4. Rule passion - faith - tradition - and all things with tempered reason.
5. Protect people and nations with fair laws and just courts.
6. Let all nations rule internally resolving external disputes in a world court.
7. Avoid petty laws and useless officials.
8. Balance personal rights with social duties.
9. Prize truth - beauty - love - seeking harmony with the infinite.
10.Be not a cancer on the earth - Leave room for nature - Leave room for nature.

Mr Blair's Cartel colleagues include the Trilateral Commission, Round table Group, Bilderbergers, European Union Commission, Rockerfeller Institute, Rothschild family, and associated criminal gangs. These groups front for an organisation which goes by names such as the Illuminati, Zionist Lobby, International Banking Industry, Big Pharma... at the head of this terrorist group are figures such as the British Monarchy, the Israeli government and the Vatican II Group.

Before being elevated to the international wing of this infamous terrorist gang, Blair was a runner for the British branch, and responsible for the atrocities in Ireland committed under the name of IRA, UVF etc (as branches of Queen Elizabeth II's MI5).

I report Tony Blair and his terrorist collaborators, sure in the knowledge that British justice will prevail.

Your Gullible, brain-washed, TV-watching servant...

Third Positionism is twenty years old. The 10 points of Third Positionism which were formulated in 1989 have proven their worth. Not only do they remain as valid as they did in 1989, but they become more valid as each day passes.

It is true that the likes of Gri££in publicly espoused Third Positionism, then went on to advocate reactionary 'right-wing' politics. By accepting the left-right Masonic spectrum and seeking a place in it, these people have proven that they only paid lip service to the Spiritual Purpose encapsulated in the ideology they flirted with.

Those who now call themselves National Bolsheviks, National Anarchists, (Ziono-)Populists, Third Wayists etc have slipped into a materialist way of thinking - if they ever escaped it at all. This does not in any way dilute the importance of the Third Position.

Third Positionism is not merely an ideology, it is a way of life. All the movements which have been touched by this creed have benefited as a result. It is those which cling to materialist and establishment dogma (Monarchism, Zionism, Capitalism, Communism, Imperialism, Sectarianism, Addiction to Westminster &c)who have fallen into the traps set for them by the dogmas they adhere to.

As we race towards 2012 and the Global Superstate, Third Positionism is the only creed for those who refuse to sacrifice themselves and their families on the altar of International Materialism.

Let Gri££in and co accept the microchip and all that comes with it. Our concern is not with those who refuse to see the world for what it is; less so for those who purposely squeeze their eyes shut to block out the truth.

See the Ten Point Declaration of the Third Position HERE

The Globalists' Messiah and puppet President of the USA, Ehud Barak Obama, has once again shown how democratic the establishment of the USA is, and how much value can be placed in the words which spew forth from the mouths of politicians. Further emphasising his commitment to 'Change', Obama has taken the bold step of adjusting US policy as regards subservience to Israel through the fifth column of AIPAC. American policy used to be almost completely tailored to follow Israeli instruction. Now, Obama has 'Changed' this so that the tailoring need no longer be described as 'almost'.

As reported in the Israeli Ynet News, speaking at a pilgrimage to the Washington (DC) Wiesel Institute for fleecing the Goyim, devotee of Holocaustianity, Obama, in true sermonising manner stated:

"To this day, there are those who insist the Holocaust never happened, who perpetrate every form of intolerance. We have an opportunity as well as an obligation to confront these scourges… That is my commitment as president. How do we ensure that 'never again' [Never again? The Holyhoax Never happened once, how can a non-event happen Again?] isn't an empty slogan or merely an aspiration, but also a call to action? I believe we start by doing what we are doing today – by bearing witness, by fighting the silence that is evil's greatest co-conspirator." - Or to translate the Newspeak, by upping the lying propaganda and further persecuting those who dare to stand up for truth.

Obama prostrated himself before his self-chosen masters, in a manner which would make any African-American with hang-ups about Slavery, physically sick, bragging about his visit to the Zionist Satanic Synagogue, Yad Vashem, stating that the bandit state Israel had risen "from the destruction of the Holocaust." This of course is true - Israel has been built on the holocaust of Palestine. Without the ritual slaughter of the Semitic people of Palestine, the Ashkenazi butchers would not be in possesion of the stolen land of Palestine.

High Priest of Holocaustianity, Elie Wiesel, asked the hand-wringing question "Will the world ever learn?" and in true democratic fashion lamented the attendance of Iranian President Ahmadinejad at a UN forum to discuss racism, asking "Why was he invited...if Auschwitz could not cure the world of anti-Semitism, what will?" - Perhaps not supporting the anti-Semitic, murdering, criminal state of Israel eh Mr Obama?

Au Weh indeed!

See the blog below for comments which sum up the puppet Obama and his inhuman masters...

http://obamboozled.blogspot.com/2009/04/obama-vows-to-battle-holocaust-denial.html

Source: http://blackouteurope.eu/

URGENT - VOTING IN EU PARLIAMENT 5th of MAY 2009
Don't let the EU parliament lock up the Internet! There will be no way back!

Act now!
Internet access is not conditional


Everyone who owns a website has an interest in defending the free use of Internet... so has everyone who uses Google or Skype... everyone who expresses their opinions freely, does research of any kind, whether for personal health problems or academic study ... everyone who shops online...who dates online...socialises online... listens to music...watches video...

Millions of Europeans now depend on the Internet, directly or indirectly, for their livelihood. Taking it away, chopping it up, ‘restricting it', ‘limiting it' and placing conditions on our use of it, will have a direct impact on people's earnings. And in the current financial climate, that can't be good.

The internet as we know it is at risk because of proposed new EU rules going through end of April. Under the proposed new rules, broadband providers will be legally able to limit the number of websites you can look at, and to tell you whether or not you are allowed to use particular services. It will be dressed up as ‘new consumer options' which people can choose from. People will be offered TV-like packages - with a limited number of options for you to access.

It means that the Internet will be packaged up and your ability to access and to put up content could be severely restricted. It will create boxes of Internet accessibility, which don't fit with the way we use it today. This is because internet is now permitting exchanges between persons which cannot be controlled or "facilitated" by any middlemen (the state or a corporation) and this possibility improves the citizen's life but force the industry to lose power and control. that's why they are pushing governments to act those changes.

The excuse is to control the flow of music, films and entertainment content against the alleged piracy by downloading for free, using P2P file-sharing. However, the real victims of this plan will be all Internet users and the democratic and independent access to information, culture goods.

Think about how you use the Internet! What would it mean to you if free access to the Internet was taken away?

These days, the Internet is about life and freedom. It's about shopping, booking theatre tickets ... holidays, learning, job-seeking, banking, and trade. It's also about the fun things - dating, chatting, invitations, music, entertainment, joking and even a Second Life. It is a tool to express ourselves, to collaborate, innovate, share, stimulate new business ideas, reach new markets - thrive without middlemen..

Just think - what's your web address? Unless people have that address in their "package" of regular websites - they won't be able to find you. That means they can't buy, or book, or register, or even view you online. Your business won't be able to find niche suppliers of goods - and compare prices. If you get any money at all from advertising on your site, it will diminish. Yes, Amazon and a select few will be OK, they will be the included in the package. But your advertising on Google or any other website, will be increasingly worthless. Skype could be blocked. (As it is in Germany in the use from iPhone, already). Small businesses could literally disappear, especially specialist, niche or artisan businesses.

If we don't do something now - we could lose free and open use of the internet. Our freedom (of choice in information, market, culture, pleasure) will be curtailed. The EU proposals hold an enormous risk for our future. They are about to become Law - and will be virtually impossible to reverse. People (even the members of the European Parliament who are voting on it) don't really seem to understand the full implications and the legal changes are wrapped up in something called "Telecoms Package" which lulls people into thinking it is just about industry.

However, in reality, hiding from public view, the amendments are about the way the Internet will operate in future! Text that expresses your rights to access and distribute content, services and applications, is being crossed out. And the text that is being brought in, says that broadband providers must inform you of any limitations, or restrictions to your broadband service. Alternative versions use the word ‘conditions' - and it is seriously being proposed that you will be told the conditions of use of Internet services. This is made to sound good - it is dressed up as ‘transparency' - except that of course it means that the broadband provider will have the legal right restrict your access or impose conditions,otherwise why would they need tell you? If the Telecoms Package amendmentsare voted in, the changes will not be reversible.

We all have a stake in the Internet! You need to act now to save it!
What can you do about it?

Tell the European Parliament to vote against conditional access to the Internet! Remind them that they need your vote in June and that internet still give us the tools to be watching and judging what they are doing! (link a la quadrature du net) You must know you are not alone: hundreds of organisations are working on that and thousands of people have already contact their parliamentarians about this issue.

So, act now:
1 - Email, write to or phone your MEP - follow this link to get theirdetails - a suggested template letter is attached. You can also use the following software that send the letter directly to all the parliamentarians. Believe, they will really receive it and they will really feel the pressure. You are welcome to personalize the letter and include information that will make MEPs wake up, take note and take appropriate action.

2 - Forward this email to everyone you know so that they can take action.

3 - Syndicate this page so that you keep been informed: disinformation is what they count on, we must be aware. Text for people to cut and paste to MEP: The coalition version needs to have instructions for people from each country. coalition members need to get a translated version online in their own languages and link to the LQ site for their own MEPs.

Suggest you indicate:


Here are the MEPs who are important in the process.
Here are the MEPs from [your country] [or list each country of the coalition] .

This is suggested letter / email to send to your MEP. Personalise this email to include your own Internet use in your personal and business life. Change the sentence in red to personalise the email and tell the MEP how you individually use the Internet or just take it off.

Former Prime Minister of the UK, Tony Blair, when in the British Embassy in Washington, USA, just before Easter wrote in the Vilest Inbred Parasites (VIP) book, that his home is Jerusalem. Tony Blair is currently prostituting himself before his Globalist bosses as Middle East Peace Envoy. So does this mean he identifies with Jerusalem because he instinctively abhors the occupation of Palestine and the persecution of the Palestinians in their own capital? Or does it mean he identifies himself with the brutal criminals who illegally occupy the land of Palestine using the farcical, historically incorrect, Israel?

Why is Tony Blair doing the rounds as a Middle East Envoy? What is his interest in Ersatz, sorry Eretz Y'Israel?

Well, perhaps we can find clues in his address to the Labour Party Conference on the 2nd October 2001, just weeks after the 11th September MOSSAD/CIA/MI5 atrocities in New York. He stated:

"In retrospect, the Millennium marked only a moment in time. It was the events of September 11 that marked a turning point in history,...What happened on 11 September was without parallel in the bloody history of terrorism....We know those responsible...Whatever the dangers of the action we take, the dangers of inaction are far, far greater...The action we take will be proportionate; targeted; we will do all we humanly can to avoid civilian casualties...

"Round the world, 11 September is bringing Governments and people to reflect, consider and change. And in this process, amidst all the talk of war and action, there is another dimension appearing. There is a coming together. The power of community is asserting itself. We are realising how fragile are our frontiers in the face of the world's new challenges...I have long believed this interdependence defines the new world we live in...To the Afghan people we make this commitment. The conflict will not be the end. We will not walk away, as the outside world has done so many times before...

"..our self-interest and our mutual interests are today inextricably woven together. This is the politics of globalisation...We watch aspects of it with trepidation. We feel powerless, as if we were now pushed to and fro by forces far beyond our control...globalisation is a fact and, by and large, it is driven by people. Not just in finance, but in communication, in technology, increasingly in culture, in recreation. In the world of the internet, information technology and TV, there will be globalisation. And in trade, the problem is not there's too much of it; on the contrary there's too little of it...

"..round the world, nations are instinctively drawing together. In Quebec, all the countries of North and South America deciding to make one huge free trade area, rivalling Europe...In Europe, the most integrated grouping of all, we are now 15 nations. Another 12 countries negotiating to join, and more beyond that.

"A new relationship between Russia and Europe is beginning. And will not India and China, each with three times as many citizens as the whole of the EU put together, once their economies have developed sufficiently as they will do, not reconfigure entirely the geopolitics of the world and in our lifetime? That is why, with 60 per cent of our trade dependent on Europe, three million jobs tied up with Europe, much of our political weight engaged in Europe, it would be a fundamental denial of our true national interest to turn our backs on Europe. We will never let that happen...

"This is a moment to seize. The Kaleidoscope has been shaken. The pieces are in flux. Soon they will settle again. Before they do, let us re-order this world around us."

(Full text: part one; part two)

This speech was B.Liar at his Globalist worst. His speech contained nothing about serving Great Britain - the nation of which he was Prime Minister - but instead prattled on about the need for Global Integration. Perhaps this explains why he feels more at home in the occupied capital of Palestine, Jerusalem, which is the proposed Global Capital for the 'New World Order' as laid out in the blueprints of the Protocols of Zion.

Were Tony Blair just another former Prime Minister doing the international junket, then his professed allegiance to Israel would be inconsequential. However, Blair is on the campaign trail to become the first President of the EU. This makes his public statement of subservience to the Zionist State very disturbing indeed. People with little understanding of the significance of his public expressions of fidelity will argue that he made a mistake. This is nonsense. His writing that his home is Jerusalem, when signing the VIP book, was a deliberate act of openly devoting himself to his masters.

Should the Lisbon Treaty be ratified, whether Blair becomes President or not, we can be sure that the judaisation of the EU into the Jeuropean Soviet Union will be accelerated. With the accession of the Zionist State of Turkey, the death of Europe will be virtually guaranteed. Now is the time to stop this monster.

Recently in the United Kingdom, the spectre of Irish terrorism reared its head again. The spiral of violence which had been a feature of life in the British Isles since the 1960s had stopped altogether, with terrorists from the Green and Orange factions declaring ceasefires. Why then has the violence restarted?

The reason the IRA has been reactivated is to scare the people of Ireland into accepting the Lisbon Treaty, which will be the basis for the Constitution of the European Union.

The IRA (Irish Republican Army) grew from the IRB (Irish Republican Brotherhood). In the pantomime of British politics, the IRA were given the role of being opponents of the UVF (Ulster Volunteer Force), which was an outgrowth of the Orange Order.

In official political history, the IRA are portrayed as fighters defending the 6 Counties in the North of Ireland from the British occupiers. The UVF are portrayed as fighters defending the British people of Ulster against the aggression of Irish invaders. In truth, the province of Ulster is at once British AND Irish. The entire conflict is a farce, with Celt fighting Celt for no valid reason. The people of Ulster are Scots-Irish on both sides of the divide. They are kinsmen who have been manipulated into identifying themselves with contrived sectarian issues. The entire Protestant vs Catholic, Green vs Orange division would be the stuff of comedy, were it not for the lives of real people which had been snuffed out or ruined.

Putting the official history of the Ulster conflict in the box of lies where it belongs, the truth is somewhat different to what the establishment would have us believe. The Irish Tricolour clearly shows the reality of who is behind the bloodshed in Ireland. The flag contains the colours Green, White and Orange. The Nationalist faction (IRA) in the conflict use the colour Green, whites the Loyalist faction (UVF) use the Colour Orange. The significance of this is that the IRB and Orange Order are both Masonic Lodges, and Freemasons chose the colours of the flag. The IRB and Orange Lodge are made up of brother Masons, who use the IRA and UVF to terrify the ordinary populations into submitting to their agenda.

Violence has been used in the British Isles by the Masonic Brethren to justify the transformation of the nations into Police States. Now, with the possibility of the Lisbon treaty being defeated by the freedom-loving Irish, the IRA has been wheeled out to terrorise the people into accepting a single European Superstate as the alternative to a divided Ireland with civil war on the streets. Who are the Real IRA? They are operatives of the British Government and its puppets in the Irish Republic. The same is true of the UVF.

It is not the Irish or the British who are to blame for the bloodshed in the Isles, but the establishment, and ultimately the Monarchy who control them.

Say No to the Lisbon Treaty, and No to the Monarchy. A free Europe of many nations is the solution to the threat of terrorism. A Europe where all Monarchies are memories and where the corpses of the British Royal family are on display to dissuade any would-be traitors form ever again murdering and raping our people to satisfy their depravity and bloodlust, and to increase their power and wealth.

One of the great ironies of the move towards a New World Order is that in the process of building Super States such as the European Union, the controlled media are being used to whip up hatred amongst the indigenous peoples, whilst pushing the melting pot propaganda.

In Great Britain, the tabloids (which laughingly masquerade as ‘news’ papers), daily push propaganda attacking the new arrivals from Eastern Europe. To read the stories in such rags as the ‘Sun’ and ‘Mirror’, one could be forgiven for believing that every crime in the country was committed by people from Poland, Slovakia, the Czech Republic etc.

This hysteria has even found expression amongst members of the Nationalist community. It saddens me to say that I have heard otherwise sensible people speaking of the need to deport all the Poles as they are threatening the character of Britain!

In truth, with the exception of certain groups of European passport holders, typically from Romania, the vast majority of the people from the East of Europe have caused no problems in Britain, and have in fact had a positive impact upon the communities in which they have become resident. Those who have acted as criminals acted as scum in the lands in which they lived before coming to our shores, and were it not for the plague of political correctness, would certainly never have been granted citizenship in the lands they have infested. True to the false reporting of the British press, these parasites have been labelled as Romanians, Hungarians, Bulgarians etc, rather than having their real identities revealed.

In contrast to the scapegoating of our European Brothers and sisters, the controlled press have been silent in exposing the mafia who control the people-trafficking, prostitution, heroin-dealing, and serious organised crime. These people tend to have European passports, and generally British ones at that. However, the media remain silent. I would comment as to why this is, but doing so would contravene legislation which is in place to aid the bedding down of the those who are ancestors would never have allowed to remain on our shores. Such is our faux democracy.

I appeal to all who have the sense to see through the lies of the media, to see our brethren from the East for what they are – our kinfolk. In areas where Britons have been unable to go for decades, the newcomers have made inroads for all of us.

We need to get away from seeing Nationality as being based on bits of paper. This is pure judicial nonsense. We need to start seeing the importance of kinship above all else.

You can guarantee that the media will welcome the accession of Turkey to the EU, even though the Zionist nation is not in any way European, but is, as it always has been, a mortal enemy of all things European.

The time has come to take a stand. From Galway to the Urals, long live the real Europe. The land of the Celts, Germans, Norse, Dinarics and Slavs!

оклик Россия оклик европа

Today, the 20th April 2009, marks the 120th anniversary of the birth of Adolf Hitler, leader of the NSDAP. To National Socialists this is a day of celebration. To others the day comes with other feelings.

There are those who proclaim Hitler to be the Devil himself - to have been the man who ordered the destruction of European Jewry, and planned to take over the world. This accusation must be dismissed as the ripple throughout history of crude propaganda by the establishments of the nations militarily organised against the Third Reich. The professed goal of the NSDAP was Lebensraum for the German |people, not global conquest. Likewise, the alleged holocaust is a lie of the biggest magnitude, and when looked at objectively, an insult to all the peoples of Europe who have ever since been attacked using this falsehood.

So, what then should we make of Adolf Hitler and his contributi0on to World History?

Adolf Hitler was a man who presented himself as the saviour of Germany. However, in 1945, Germany was in ruins, with millions of Germans dead, wounded, raped, destitute, and vilified throughout the world. The proudest of all the nations of Europe was subjected to the basest humiliation with the sickest crimes committed by the victor against its people. Surely we cannot blame Hitler for that, can we? Wasn’t Hitler fighting a life and death struggle to save Germany from the amassed forces of bolshevism and plutocracy? How can those of us who weren’t even born at the time of the Second World War judge the man who fought to save his nation from the Satanic forces which conquered Europe?

I would say that because we find ourselves living in a European super-state controlled by what can only be called dæmonic forces, we must examine how this came to pass, and what was Hitler’s rôle in destroying the old Europe to pave the way for the new anti-Europe in which we live.

There is great controversy over Hitler’s political and ethnic background. It has been claimed that he was an illegitimate member of the Rothschild dynasty. For those who appreciate the importance of bloodlines in the unfolding of history, this is no small matter. Ironically it is professed National Socialists, often the most vehemently anti-Judaic, who refuse to discuss this issue. If Hitler was related by blood to the most prominent of the Zionist families, then this is no insignificant detail – it is in fact a very important detail, which demands attention.

Another question that must be addressed is Hitler’s war strategy. Having defeated France in 1940, Hitler could have finished the War on the Western Front by capturing the British Expeditionary Force. The result would have been to put Britain in a position where her establishment would have been forced to negotiate a peace in order to ensure the safe return of her fighting men. Did Hitler take the golden opportunity presented by the stranding of the BEF in Belgium and France, as a means to end the war with the Germanic-Celtic nation of Great Britain? No. He allowed the BEF to retreat to the British mainland, even going so far as ordering his generals not to attempt to prevent the rescue of the stranded British Servicemen. Hitler often spoke of the necessity of grabbing hold of whatever the ‘Goddess of Fortune’ proffered, lest the opportunity never be repeated. The BEF incident showed a refusal to take advantage of the situation, and forced a multi-front war on Germany and his allies. Can this be put down to a mere misjudgement of the British establishment? Or was it a calculated tactic to ensure Total War and the destruction of Germany?

Following the debacle on the Western Front, Hitler launched Unternehmen Barbarossa against the Soviet Union. The Armies of the Third Reich achieved unimaginable victories and looked set to smash the USSR. Again, Hitler’s orders are bizarre. The European people who had suffered under the non-European, non-Christian, Soviet Kommisariat, greeted the armies led by Germany as liberators. They had suffered under the heel of Talmudic Bolshevism, and rushed to greet their European brothers from the West. Hitler ordered the German military to treat the people of Eastern Europe as sub-humans. Rather than enlisting the populations of the liberated nations to the side of Free Europe, the civilians were treated as cattle, in much the same ,manner as they had been under the Soviets. These legions of potential allies were forced into the arms of the Soviets to fight in what Stalin termed the ‘Great Patriotic War’. Again, defeat was clasped form the jaws of victory.

In 1941, the Geramn Army had reached Volgograd. General Paulus of the Sixth Army advised Hitler that supply lines were over stretched. Incredibly, rather than encircling the city (renamed Stalingrad), and driving forward to the oil-rich lands beyond, Hitler ordered that Volgograd-Stalingrad be captured at any costs. Paulus was over-ruled and the infamous Battle of Stalingrad proceeded. The Goddess of Fortune had offered the Axis armies the oil foields of the Caucasus and almost certain vicory over the Soviets. This would have completed the war on the Eastern Front. Hitler instead chose to force his soldiers into the charnel house of Stalingrad, which led to the deaths through combat, starvation, frost, and execution, of some of Europe’s finest men. This defeat was in truth the death blow for Europe, from which our continent has never recovered.

The Blitzkrieg air raids over Great Britain were a well conceived strategy to break the military capabilities of Britain. Taken alongside the highly successful U-boat blockades, it was only a matter of time before Great Britain would have been unable to feed herself or continue the war effort. Hitler ordered the air-raids to shift away from attacking military and industrial tragets, and to focus upon civilians, in terror raids like those being inflicted upon German civilians. The result of this was to galvanise British support for the War, and to allow for increased military efficiency. Was this mere misjudgement on behalf of Hitler, or was it intentional and designed to lenghten the war and further wreck all Europena natins involved?

Hitler’s treatment of the Jews is another point which has to be examined without the blinkers of ideology. The lie of the Holocaust is a huge smokecreen. Hitler’s regime had many Jews in prominent positions, and the policy regarding Organised Jewry cannot really be described as anything less than Zionist. The film ‘Schindler’s List’ portrays Herr Schindler as an exceptional nan who smuggled Jews into Palestine. He was not exceptional in any way. Jews were routinely removed from Europe to Palestine as a matter of German policy. The real result of Hitler’s anti-Jewish policies was to put a stop to the process of assimilation which had been threatening the very existence of a separate Jewish people in Europe. By detaining ordinary Jews, the Hitler regime actually aided the Zionist agenda of creating a Jewish persecution complex in order to ensure the survival of the Jews as an ethnic group. When one considers that ethnically, apart from the Sephardim (who are persecuted by the dominant Ashkenazi false Jews), there really is no such thing as a Jewish Race, Hitler’s policy cannoyt be seen as anything but disasterous for all nations of the World. Without the anti-Jewish hysteria, there would have been no justification for the establishment of Eretz Yisrael. The anti-Jewish policy of the Nazi regime was 100% Ashke-Nazi.

Today marks 120 years since the birth of Adolf Hitler. His National Socialist Movement presented the world with policies to overthrow the Freemasonic network, to defeat Globalism and ensure National Freedom and Social Justice for all. With the advent of the War, the ideology of National Socialism has been so tarred by the propaganda of the victors and the self-destructive actions ordered by Hitler, that any oppostion to the Globalist agenda which attempts to utilise realistic and effective means to oppose the New World Order, is reacted to in a Pavlovian manner as being ‘evil’.

The only solution to Globalism is Nationalism. The only solution to the concentration of power and property (whether Capitalist or Communist) is the widest practicable Distribution. On Hitler’s 120th birthday, we need to face the reality that National Distributism, as a core tenet of National Socialism, is the solution to the Satanic-Imperialist-Masonic-Zionist New World Order. And we need to face up to the fact that we will forever be linked to Hitler for this.

We need to ask ourselves how we are to deal with the Hitler issue. It matters whether Hitler was manipulated into destroying Europe and building Israel; whether his mistakes were genuine and without hindsight may have been unavoidable; whether his involvement was more sinister and guided by the Rothschilds to whom he may have been related.

I know this artcle will offend Hitlerian National Socialists. It is not my intention to please anyone, rather to find real ways to halt and to unravel the fast solidifying Global Super-state. Hitlerite, Strasserite, Nazi, Anti-Nazi? What difference will it make when the One World Government is completed and all freedoms abolished? All comments are welcome. So fans of Hitler and opponents alike, what do you think?

Are you feeling marginalized, cheated, or otherwise oppressed? Disturbed by abortion? Angry about the current economic and political climate? Upset about millions of illegal immigrants our government won't arrest or deport? If you said yes to any of these questions and you're White then be advised that the Department of Homeland Security considers you a potential enemy of the state.

Rightwing Extremism: Current Economic and Political Climate Fueling Resurgence in Radicalization and Recruitment (via Washington Times):

The DHS/Office of Intelligence and Analysis (I&A) has no specific information that domestic rightwing* terrorists are currently planning acts of violence, but rightwing extremists may be gaining new recruits by playing on their fears about several emergent issues. The economic downturn and the election of the first African American president present unique drivers for rightwing radicalization and recruitment.

Rightwing extremists have capitalized on the election of the first African American president, and are focusing their efforts to recruit new members, mobilize existing supporters, and broaden their scope and appeal through propaganda, but they have not yet turned to attack planning.

Note that "rightwing extremists" are being accused of reacting to actual facts and events, while the writers of this report are the ones "playing on fears". This report is a perfect example of propaganda. It not only demonizes an opposing cause, it does so by inverting reality.

* Rightwing extremism in the United States can be broadly divided into those groups, movements, and adherents that are primarily hate-oriented (based on hatred of particular religious, racial or ethnic groups), and those that are mainly antigovernment, rejecting federal authority in favor of state or local authority, or rejecting government authority entirely. It may include groups and individuals that are dedicated to a single issue, such as opposition to abortion or immigration.

This is the footnote many media reports have focused on.

Note that the hate rhetoric is another inversion. The effect of this report, if not its desired purpose, is to fuel ill will towards Whites who are reacting to what we perceive as aggression and dispossession.
The "rightwing extremist" and "white supremacist" smears used to describe the disparate and well-intentioned people who favor state or local authority or oppose abortion or immigration reveals the report writers' hypocritical hatred of even the weakest and most disjoint expressions of racial/religious self-interest from a particular racial/religious group: White Christians.

The report specifically targets and deliberately pathologizes Whites who are disturbed by anything we consider harmful to our interests.

Proposed imposition of firearms restrictions and weapons bans likely would attract new members into the ranks of rightwing extremist groups, as well as potentially spur some of them to begin planning and training for violence against the government. The high volume of purchases and stockpiling of weapons and ammunition by rightwing extremists in anticipation of restrictions and bans in some parts of the country continue to be a primary concern to law enforcement.

The founders of our country clearly trusted in and recognized the value of a well-armed citizenry and unambiguously expressed these beliefs in the 2nd amendment. Those who propose the imposition of firearms restrictions and weapons bans without amending the constitution are the extremists.

A recent example of the potential violence associated with a rise in rightwing extremism may be found in the shooting deaths of three police officers in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, on 4 April 2009. The alleged gunman’s reaction reportedly was influenced by his racist ideology and belief in antigovernment conspiracy theories related to gun confiscations, citizen detention camps, and a Jewish-controlled “one world government.”

Note that this report is not only specifically antagonistic toward Whites acting in our own defense, it is also specifically sympathetic to jews.

Rightwing extremist chatter on the Internet continues to focus on the economy, the perceived loss of U.S. jobs in the manufacturing and construction sectors, and home foreclosures. Anti-Semitic extremists attribute these losses to a deliberate conspiracy conducted by a cabal of Jewish “financial elites.” These “accusatory” tactics are employed to draw new recruits into rightwing extremist groups and further radicalize those already subscribing to extremist beliefs. DHS/I&A assesses this trend is likely to accelerate if the economy is perceived to worsen.

The chain of causation is reversed. The very real foreclosures and loss of jobs fuels the perceived disastrous costs of the globalist, materialist, consumerist pyramid scheme euphemistically referred to as "the economy".

The writers of this report are so keen to protect "financial elites" (and specifically jews) who have perpetrated fraud that they use the very accusatory tactics they decry to direct blame and hate instead onto what they imagine is deliberate conspiracy conducted by a cabal of admittedly powerless "rightwing extremist groups".

Rightwing extremists are harnessing this historical election as a recruitment tool. Many rightwing extremists are antagonistic toward the new presidential administration and its perceived stance on a range of issues, including immigration and citizenship, the expansion of social programs to minorities, and restrictions on firearms ownership and use. Rightwing extremists are increasingly galvanized by these concerns and leverage them as drivers for recruitment. From the 2008 election timeframe to the present, rightwing extremists have capitalized on related racial and political prejudices in expanded propaganda campaigns, thereby reaching out to a wider audience of potential sympathizers.

Once again the word "perceived" marks an inversion.

Whites were the most evenly split racial group in the presidential election. The more lopsided votes of every other group are justifiably understood to reflect antagonism toward Whites because the new presidential administration's support for immigration is in fact reducing Whites to a minority. The new presidential administration has and continues to capitalize on related racial and political prejudices against Whites - this report being a prime example.

Paralleling the current national climate, rightwing extremists during the 1990s exploited a variety of social issues and political themes to increase group visibility and recruit new members. Prominent among these themes were the militia movement’s opposition to gun control efforts, criticism of free trade agreements (particularly those with Mexico), and highlighting perceived government infringement on civil liberties as well as white supremacists’ longstanding exploitation of social issues such as abortion, inter-racial crimes, and same-sex marriage. During the 1990s, these issues contributed to the growth in the number of domestic rightwing terrorist and extremist groups and an increase in violent acts targeting government facilities, law enforcement officers, banks, and infrastructure sectors.

Here's how "longstanding exploitation" works.

Some Whites recognize and complain about the unrelenting assault on our social and political interests and try to defend them. In this defense we constantly face smooth-talking dishonest aggressors just like the people who wrote this DHS report. This fills some Whites with frustration and despair, and they react violently. Then we're all smeared as "extremists" and the violent reactions are exploited, even decades later, to justify and continue the assault against us. This report again provides a prime example. In seven pages of text Timothy McVeigh and the Oklahoma City bombing are mentioned three times.

Historically, domestic rightwing extremists have feared, predicted, and anticipated a cataclysmic economic collapse in the United States. Prominent antigovernment conspiracy theorists have incorporated aspects of an impending economic collapse to intensify fear and paranoia among like-minded individuals and to attract recruits during times of economic uncertainty. Conspiracy theories involving declarations of martial law, impending civil strife or racial conflict, suspension of the U.S. Constitution, and the creation of citizen detention camps often incorporate aspects of a failed economy. Antigovernment conspiracy theories and “end times” prophecies could motivate extremist individuals and groups to stockpile food, ammunition, and weapons. These teachings also have been linked with the radicalization of domestic extremist individuals and groups in the past, such as violent Christian Identity organizations and extremist members of the militia movement.

Over the past five years, various rightwing extremists, including militias and white supremacists, have adopted the immigration issue as a call to action, rallying point, and recruiting tool. Debates over appropriate immigration levels and enforcement policy generally fall within the realm of protected political speech under the First Amendment, but in some cases, anti-immigration or strident pro-enforcement fervor has been directed against specific groups and has the potential to turn violent.

The constitution describes the political structure of a government. The fear that this structure has been subverted and illegitimately replaced with what amounts to a new kind of government is based on the very real evidence (the report we're examining here for example) that the current government and its defense is based primarily on economics. In addition, the writers of this report are clearly antipathetic to the constitutional principles codified in the 1st and 2nd amendments. Their strident fervor is directed specifically against Whites who would defend and uphold the constitution.

Rightwing extremist paranoia of foreign regimes could escalate or be magnified in the event of an economic crisis or military confrontation, harkening back to the “New World Order” conspiracy theories of the 1990s.

The report writers seem to resent that theories with predictive value are naturally magnified. They present no evidence to substantiate their paranoid theories concerning "rightwing extremist paranoia of foreign regimes". The bulk of their report makes the case that "rightwing extremists" are most concerned about the domestic regime.

— (U//LES) DHS/I&A has concluded that white supremacist lone wolves pose the most significant domestic terrorist threat because of their low profile and autonomy—separate from any formalized group—which hampers warning efforts.

— (U//FOUO) Similarly, recent state and municipal law enforcement reporting has warned of the dangers of rightwing extremists embracing the tactics of “leaderless resistance” and of lone wolves carrying out acts of violence.

Note that the biggest threat they perceive to the deliberately organized and government-supported demonization, disarming, and dispossession of Whites is the disorganized resistance of individual Whites acting independently. The moral: native Whites who conclude that our current government is acting against our interests are by this very act justifying the government to work that much harder against us. Regardless of what they might think or do however, immigrants and financial elites can rest assured that the government is actively defending their interests.

A prominent civil rights organization reported in 2006 that “large numbers of potentially violent neo-Nazis, skinheads, and other white supremacists are now learning the art of warfare in the [U.S.] armed forces.”

The "prominent civil rights organization" is not specified, but the source of the quote indicates that it is actually an anti-White-rights group.

Racist Extremists Active in U.S. Military - SPLC urges Rumsfeld to adopt zero-tolerance policy:

Southern Poverty Law Center President Richard Cohen urged Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld to adopt a zero-tolerance policy regarding racist extremism among members of the U.S. military.

"Because hate group membership and extremist activity are antithetical to the values and mission of our armed forces, we urge you to adopt a zero-tolerance policy when it comes to white supremacy in the military and to take all necessary steps to ensure that the policy is rigorously enforced," Cohen wrote in a letter to Rumsfeld.

Military extremists present an elevated threat both to their fellow soldiers and the general public. Today's white supremacists become tomorrow's domestic terrorists.

Zero tolerance for Whites pretty much sums up the hate-oriented nature of the domestic terrorists who have insinuated themselves and their anti-White ideas into the very highest levels of our government.

Stood on the westbound platform of Cruddersfield Railway Station today, I was reminded of childhood færy tales. Everywhere I looked were the most bizarre creatures imaginable. There were tall and thin elvish beings with the darkest blue skin, and squat orange gnomes with beards longer than their entire bodies. Amongst the most comical of the creatures was a bizarre coupling of a tiny emaciated 'grey' alien with a multi-ocular rat-dæmon, which slithered along the platform gracefully and effortlessly - in spite of its gravity defying mass.

I boarded my train and waited for it to depart for Pixiechester. Along came the ticket inspector - a bright crimson coloured entity who spoke in clicks and bleeps. It took all my efforts to work out what he was saying. I would have asked one of the other beings in the carriage to translate but alas, amongst the multitude of diverse beings from every imaginable dimension and space-time zone, not one shared the same tonal wavescale as the inspector, nor was a single human in sight aboard.

The train arrived at Pixadilly Station where I disembarked. Heading out towards the City Centre I passed rows of non-humans begging for cash to spend on poppy essence. This was much the same as back in Cruddersfield. The only difference was that the non-humans here were more persistent in their begging ways, and to my horror a good many humans were also lining the streets with their hands outstretched begging for poppy-buying cash.

I thought back to happier times before the Reptilian Shape-shifters had completely taken over the Government. In those days, the gateway to the other dimensions had remained closed, and the only people one would come across were actually humans who spoke with the same words and had the same cultures. Certainly there were differences from area to area, but at least we were all of a common source. As I pondered this, the grey from Cruddersfield emerged from the Station, having climbed aboard the same train as myself.

My plan had worked! Unbeknownst to the grey and the rat-dæmon, I knew that the area adjacent to Pixadilly was a portal to the hell realm, from whence the rat-dæmon had come. Carefully invoking Alocer, the Guardian of the Seventh Gate to open the portal, I side-stepped the grey and its companion who were sucked through the portal to a dimension from which not even their reptoid masters could retrieve them.

A job well done, I returned to Cruddersfield to see which other beings I could lure to the portal in Pixichester, the City of the Damned. But that, as they say, is another story...

I originally wrote the following article on the 11th July 2008 for inclusion in the BPP magazine, 'Vanguard'. The article was not published at the time, and to my understanding had been discarded. However, over the weekend I was informed that the article is now in circulation - published in order to cause mischief, and published against my wishes. I am reproducing the article in order to answer questions which have been posted in various fora. I have written my comments in bold after each section

Open letter to the National Front (11.7.8)

I write this with a degree of sadness. I strongly believe in Nationalist Unity and have up to this point refrained from commenting adversely on any organisation that belongs to the Nationalist family. However, I feel that I can no longer remain silent with regards to the National Front. I have remained silent in spite of the National Front proscribing the British People’s Party. This proscription was an act of spite, coming from the jealousy of the National Front for the British People’s Party being stronger numerically and ideologically. This pettiness is indicative of a profound malaise at the heart of the National Front.

....I do not believe in the proscribing of any legal organisation. Certainly, taking steps to ensure that members do not fraternise with terrorists (IRA, UVF) and Police honey traps (C18), is vital. No serious organisation can tolerate those who advocate violence. The BPP wholeheartedly opposed terrorism. If it had been any other away, I would not have given the BPP my support.

The National Front is an organisation with an impressive history. In the 1970s it was a serious force in British politics. Had the Conservative Party not cynically stolen the NF’s policies, life in this country may well have been much better than it is today. The developments in the 1980s that led to Third Positionism becoming an important aspect of Nationalist thought also deserve much praise. Unfortunately these advances tend to be forgotten due to the personality clashes and schisms that resulted. They remain praiseworthy nonetheless.

The National Front of today is not even a shadow of its former self. It has neither the physical impact of the original Front nor the spiritual and moral ideological presence of the Political Soldier stage of the NF. Both stages of the NF were impressive, the latter even more so than the former for the continuing influence of the radical ideas the NF infused into the greater Nationalist movement.

Such have been the splits and regroupings that aside from the name, the current NF has virtually nothing in common with the great party whose name the modern pretenders have usurped. It is a shame that the name ‘National Front’ has not been given a decent burial so it may be remembered with respect as the inspiration to generations of Nationalists. By continuing to use the NF name, the current grouping is tarring that memory. The Beatles are remembered as a band which had a significant impact on popular culture (for good or ill is a matter of debate!) Their strength is in part due to knowing when to quit on a high, the Rolling Stones lamentably stumbled on and lost their way. Such is the situation with the NF today.

....Whilst I still stand by my point that the NF name should have been dropped in order to preserve it as an inspiration, we find ourselves in a situation where nostalgia is a luxury we cannot afford. The NF continues, and it offers an organisational platform for driving the opposition to Globalism which is destroying every nation of the world. We need organised groups to fight the New World Order. The NF is one such group. We could get involved in romantic reminiscing for the movement that was, but it would do none of us any good. The group exists, and as such provides a vehicle for exposing the despotism of Westminster and Bruxelles. History is important, but the present is where we must fight if we are to have any chance of securing a viable future for our people.

On Thursday, 10th July, the group that calls itself the National Front stood in the Haltemprice and Howden by-election. They never stood a chance in this Conservative stronghold. The result they achieved is an embarrassment. The National Front came 4th, behind the Conservatives who won with 71.6% of the vote (17,113 votes), the Greens (7.4%, 1,758 votes) and the English Democrats (7.2%, 1,174 votes).

The National Front achieved a pathetic 2.3% of the vote – a mere 544 votes, losing their deposit. They only managed to get 23 more votes than Gemma Garrett (Miss Great Britain Party). The fact that the English Democrats trounced the NF shows just how out of touch with the electorate these pseudo-political dinosaurs are. If the NF had not stood, the English Democrats would have come in second and denied the internationalist Greens second place. The NF standing was a disaster all round.

It is a shame that Tess Culnane allowed herself to be involved in this farce. Tess is a lady for whom there is great esteem in the nationalist community. She did not need to stand in the election to prove her worth and decency – she has already done that.

....Not long after the ill-conceived election campaign, Tess Culnane left the NF due to the refusal of the old leadership to face up to the realities of political life in the Police State which is twentyfirst century Britain. It is to the shame of the immovable dinosaurs who misled the NF into the July 2008 election, that they treated Tess in such a deplorable manner. The rank and file, and Tess Culnane, are to be applauded for the effort they put into the campaign. However, the leadership should not have been so short sighted as to have pushed this petty political ploy.

The tactic of standing against David Davis in order to gain publicity was pure publicity seeking opportunism. It was wholly unprincipled. The National Front had no chance of even saving their deposit in the Haltemprice and Howden by-election. By standing they sent out a message that they oppose an honourable politician (now how often does one of those appear?) in his campaign to stop the Government grabbing the obscenely draconian power to hold suspects for 42 days without charge.

The Stalinist policy of the Brown regime is a threat to everyone - Do the National Front believe they are immune to this evil? History shows that Nationalists will suffer as much as, if not more than everyone else. David Davis stood for the sole purpose of raising awareness of the dictatorial nature of the government’s policy of detaining anyone they wish to, without trial and without reason, for 42 hours.

Tess Culnane stated that she wished to broaden the debate to cover the reasons for the current terrorist attacks, covering issues such as immigration and the wars in Iraq, Afghanistan, and Occupied Palestine etc. These are important factors, which need addressing. However, the Haltemprice and Howden by-election was not an appropriate arena for this. The 42-hour detention issue is so important that no distraction should be indulged in. Tess is a lady with convictions. Sadly the National Front leadership have taken advantage of Tess. They have proven themselves to be inappropriately opportunistic. Our complaint is not against Tess or the decent hardworking members of the National Front (and other individuals) who campaigned for her, far from it, these people acted honourably. Our objection is with the leadership of the National Front who chose to indulge in petty politics to the detriment of us all.

....I absolutely 100% stand by this statement. Fighting an unwinnable election at great expense, against a candidate who was at least discussing the tyranny of the State (albeit as a lackey of the same establishment he feigned to oppose), was in my opinion a huge error in judgement.

The NF is run by amateurs who seem incapable of formulating a coherent political strategy. The lack of direction has been apparent for some time, but this year this has palpably worsened. We have witnessed marches of around twenty people, which have served only to show the weakness of the Front and have been easy target for the opposition. We have seen failure to expel a member for proven pædophilia. We have seen tolerance of members who espouse terrorism. We have seen participation in an election that has sent out a message of support for the Brown regime and resulted in the vote received being an embarrassment. This is not all - I could go on.

....Again, I stand resolutely behind this statement. Marches of tiny bands of activists only serve to display weakness. Failing to expel pædophile scum Martyn Gilleard was an affront to decency. For this, the leadership of the time should hang their heads in shame. Ordinary members are not to blame for this lack of action by the higher echelons. It is to be hoped that the shame brought on the party will be remembered should the old leadership call on the support of the rank and file who they dishonoured with this failure to uphold the good name of the party.

This letter is an appeal to the ordinary members of the National Front who do not indulge in fantasies of armed struggle – to the vast majority. Anyone who lives under the illusion that terrorism can achieve anything other than to give the State an excuse to take away even more of our freedoms is not welcome in our ranks. This is an appeal to the decent Nationalists in the National Front, including those in the leadership who can see beyond the idea of being a big fish in a tiny murky puddle, to see that the time has come to accept that the National Front has had its day. The time has come to consign the National Front to history, to remember it with fondness and to move on.

....As I’ve written above, we are now in such a dire situation, with the imminent imposition of the European Constitution through the bogus Lisbon Treaty, that we have to fight with very legal weapon at our disposal. It matters not one jot if the NF name is dropped, and in the time lost, the slim chance of defeating the completion of the Soviet European Union, is lost. If we do not stop the shift from the current EU to the Fabian wet dream of the Communitarian Superstate, then all hope is lost. It is as simple as that.

The National Front is a Royalist Party. The Monarchy of this country is directly responsible for the unprecedented betrayal of the indigenous population and associated kinfolk. Under the First Queen Elizabeth, ordinary people (including children) were press-ganged into the Queens Navy. They were enslaved to make the Royals rich. The Royal Family claim the ‘divine right’ to rule over us. This blasphemy comes from King James who ordered the rewriting of the English translation of the Bible to give him non-existent God-given authority. This tyrant is the man who planted the Protestant Scots in Ulster. These Scots became the Loyalists who the NF supports in the ongoing sectarian warfare. We do not support the IRA – we do not support anyone who encourages intra-ethnic warfare, however we do appreciate that the Loyalists are the descendants of people who were not originally native to Ulster. This ethnic difference, with its most noticeable expression in terms of religious variation does not merit conflict – from either faction. Both Orange and Green Nationalists need to see the bigger picture. The outcome of sectarian warfare is the ultimate demise of all, to the benefit of people who have no kinship whatsoever with the folk of the British Isles.

The internationalist agenda of the burgeoning New World Order has been pushed relentlessly by the British Monarchy. It was the Royal Family who encouraged General Kitchener in his policy of murdering farmers and their families in Southern Africa. The tyrannical Queen Victoria presided over the invention of Concentration Camps, the burning of Pretoria, the rape and murder of entire Boer families – men, women, children and babies – all for the pursuit of increasing her despotic family’s wealth. The wholesale slaughter of civilians continued with the destruction of Dresden, Hamburg and other cities. The present Queen rewarded Rudi Giuliani for his part in the murderous attacks on the New York World Trade Centre. The present wars for oil and empire in the Middle East. Asia and elsewhere all fit the Globalist agenda which the Royals not only support, but revel in. The NF supports these imperialist criminals. The BPP feel that there is no justification for the British people giving their loyalty to a family who have been demonstrably disloyal to the people of the nation they purport to serve.

....Again, I stand by this statement. The Monarchy are the smiling face of our financial, social and cultural enemy. The NF must drop all support for these monsters. I hope that by working with the NF, I can expose the Royal Family for the murderers, rapists, and all round Satanic usurious vermin that they are. This may offend some people, but those who tug their forelocks and sing ‘God Save the Queen’ need to be woken up to see the reality that those they misguidedly genuflect to, are the vilest, sickest family on the planet.

All decent members of the NF, from top to bottom, who genuinely believe in putting the interests of our Nation and People before all other matters, are welcome to come to the BPP. Ours is a movement of principles.

Our movement does not indulge in petty politics but sees the bigger picture. We will not contest elections as a reaction to the political wind. We will certainly not oppose those whose ideals we share!

....I would question the principles of the BPP and the commitment to not indulge in petty politics: What else would one call mischievously publishing an article I wrote 9 months ago? Perhaps where I wrote ‘We will certainly not oppose those whose ideals we share’, I should have written ‘I’ in place of ‘We’.

We will not put our people in danger by going on marches in inadequate numbers. We do not say that we will never have marches – we may, when our numbers are sufficient to send out a message that we are strong. That time will come.

....This commitment was abandoned when the BPP held a demo against racist rap music. Whilst I applaud the initiative, the fact is that BPP personnel were put at risk. On a positive note, the hypocrisy of AFA/ACF & ANaL/SWP was exposed, with their much-vaunted anti-racism shown to be a complete sham.

We will never tolerate pædophiles in our ranks. Our movement is a family in which comradeship matters. We have a support network unrivalled in the broader Nationalist movement.

We fight for all our people, not just for a particular religious faction. We reject the sectarianism of the National Front. It is ludicrous for people of European stock to be killing one another over matters such as whether divorce is or isn’t allowed, whilst all the time we are losing our territory to outsiders. This if even less tolerable when one considers that the sectarian factions (Sinn Fein, Orange Order etc) embrace the very multiculturalism that is destroying our lands.

....The anti-Sectarian stance of the BPP has been eroded since this article was written, with badges being sold in support of Loyalist paramilitaries. I personally oppose all terrorists operating in or from the North of Ireland. They are all, trained, funded and often staffed by British Military Intelligence (MI5). Doubtless there will be some members of the NF who support these agents of British tyranny, and they will need to be educated to awareness of how they are being hoodwinked into supporting their enemies, else kicked out for the agents provocateur and idiots they must otherwise be. However, in the light of BPP leaders selling terrorist fund-raising material, this naïvety pales into near insignificance.

The NF is imperialist, sectarian, royalist and rooted in the dark history of a past we need to overcome. People who support this agenda have no part in the Nationalist movement. The NF has no part in the Nationalist movement.

....So long as the NF aids in the fight against the Global prison, then it is a useful part of the struggle. Its Imperialist, Royalist, Sectarian past is a major problem, which must be dealt with. Right now, however, it is urgent that all opponents of the New World Order march against this peril. I would go so far as to say that we should be encouraging the rank and file of groups such as UKIP and the BNP in fighting the EU totalitarian superstate.

The time has come to join a movement rooted in the present, which looks to the future. The past is gone forever – remember it but don’t try to recreate it. Join the movement, which can and will, make a real difference!

....If I was writing this article now, I would say that the time has come to get involved with any and all movements which oppose the rapid move to a Global Superstate. It is certainly not the time for poaching members to boost membership lists. Parties must now be seen as regiments in the battle against the common enemy, and not as part of the Westminster circus. To that end, we must be steering each and every organisation we can in this battle for national and cultural life and death. If you think that winning seats in Parliament will make any difference, then you may as well join one of the Parties who are already in Parliament and feed from the rotting carcass of your nation, alongside the willing servants of the establishment.

Environmentalism is an emotive issue - and naturally so. We all have to live on this planet and it is important that we take care of it. We need to protect the animals and vegetation. Also we must be more careful in ensuring we do not turn the planet into a giant rubbish heap. To that end, being environmentally conscientious is a good and laudable thing.

However, the 'Environmentalism' being preached by the likes of Al Gore, is not about caring for the planet. Sustainability is a propaganda technique to brainwash us into falling for the lie of man-made climate change. The climate is changing - it always has done so, regardless of human activity. What is the cause then? In a nutshell, the temperature of the Earth is regulated by the Sun. Increased Solar activity results in increased Earth temperature. For that matter, the other planets are influenced in the same manner. Mars, Uranus, Saturn and the rest are also experiencing 'Global Warming', but I don't think we can blame 4 by 4 drivers for that!

Why then the constant propaganda saying that ordinary people are killing the planet? Why the silencing of Science which exposes the Man-made Global Warming fraud? Why? To justify a Global tax, administered by a Global Government, enforced by a Global Police and Army. What better way to ensure compliance with the new Global Superstate than to create a new Religion for the masses to blindly follow?

Religion has long been a means of manipulating the people into serving their rulers. Fear of the big daddy in the sky watching everyone and damning all transgressors (of Priestly/State laws) to eternal suffering amid fire and brimstone, no longer works. Fear of unprovable environmental destruction is the new bogeyman to beat the masses into obedience. It is the new 'Faith' for the New World Order.

..Thanks to 'la bella senorina' for questioning this new dogma, and being a heretic swimming against the sea of political correctness - you know who you are!

Lawrence Auster's latest fruitloopery - the "rebuttable presumption", a term he introduces in the course of smearing Pat Buchanan:

The obvious explanation is animus against Jews. Let's call it a rebuttable presumption. If Buchanan and others want to rebut it, let them do so.

Let's call it a new name for a very old, very jewish tactic. The mechanics are simple. They cry "hate", and you waste your time protesting that it's not true. Or not. Either way the subject has been changed, you've been smeared, and anyone who might come to your defense knows they will be treated likewise.

A few days later an acolyte troubled The Fruitloopy One with an impertinent question. Must my analysis of Buchanan be applied to the Jews?

Is it a rebuttable presumption that any organized Jewish attacks on conservative Christian politicians in the West (America, Western Europe) are motivated by an animus against gentiles? I was under the impression that you attributed Jewish animus towards conservative America as being motivated by their utopian liberalism.

Note how the power of fruitloopery so effortlessly transforms "organized Jewish attacks on conservative Christian politicians in the West" into "The Jews".

"No, no, no", protests The Fruity One. "The Jews are compleeeeeetely different. It's not at all valid to take a standard or line of reasoning I've concocted for The Someone Elses and apply it to someone else I wasn't thinking of. I used "rebuttable presumption" to defend The Jews. You can't take it and use it against The Jews. That's just not right. But it sure does remind me of the time another person tried to apply my logic about The Blacks and The Muslims to The Jews."

That would be Auster's First Law of Majority/Minority Relations in Liberal Society, whereby The Loopster freely generalizes about groups qua groups:

The more egregiously any non-Western or non-white group behaves, the more evil whites are made to appear for noticing and drawing rational conclusions about that group's bad behavior.

Does this not fit Whites whom have noticed and drawn rational conclusions about the jewish group's bad behavior? "Not fair", scolds His Loopiness, "I only intended My Law (it's mine, you can't use it) to apply to the under-achievement and dysfunction of The Blacks and The Muslims, not the border-opening, financial-fraud-creating, minority-under-achievement-and-dysfunction-celebrating, free-speech-snuffing over-achievements of The Jews!"

- - -

In Explaining the anti-Semites' psychology Fructus Maximus Loopus tries to gyrate his way out of answering for his serial intellectual gyrations. He actually places special emphasis on stating, without rebutting, a "rebuttable presumption" he sees aimed at himself:

by the very fact of speaking in defense of white people and white society, what I am really doing is advancing the false and pernicious belief that Jews are on the side of whites. What I am really up to is helping Jews get accepted by whites as part of the white race

He has pondered this before. If he wants to rebut it, let him do so.

It is Mr. F. Loop's preoccupation with israel and "anti-semites" that reveals what he is really up to. That and his "defense of white people" which includes blaming us for suiciding ourselves, and admonishing us to fix all of the West's problems by reasserting ourselves. * In pursuing their own interests jews have led the pathologization of White racialism for more than a hundred years. They proudly led the long march of the cultural marxists through our institutions, inverting and/or obliterating our societal norms to soothe their undying alienation. But we don't need Abe Foxman or Morris Dees to "defend" us from such truths. Ever-ready friends like the Fruitinator will gladly do it for them. That's how much he cares about us "white people".

Of course, like so many of the other famous white people defenders throughout history - selfless, censorious men like Ian Jobling - Rooty Tooty Fresh n'Fruity permits himself to distinguish between jewish and non-jewish whites. He is first and foremost pro-jew. In his defense of white people however he will not tolerate anyone who would distinguish between jew and non-jew who is first and foremost non-jew.

- - -

So here's another "rebuttable presumption" for Loopenstein. He wrote in The cause of the white race will not go away:

when I consider today's systematic campaign, organized and backed by all the ruling powers of society, to put down, demonize, disempower, and marginalize the white race, I think it is shaping up as the greatest crime in the history of mankind

I don't belive he actually believes this. Fruitby Doo, if you believe this, then when will you call for the arrest and prosecution of the criminals who are responsible? Not "The Jews" Loopadoop - but those jews responsible for this crime you say you've noticed, along with everyone else who is responsible. No, of course you won't. Your "defense of white people" ends where jewish culpability begins.

* Here's the usual Toucan Sam "defense of white people":

But never forget: blacks keep indulging in such appalling behavior, decade after decade, because white America keeps giving them the moral sanction to do so--because in the 1960s whites out of a misplaced sense of racial guilt gave up their moral legitimacy and their moral leadership in this country. From which it follows that a decent social and racial order can be only restored in America if whites resume their position of leadership.

"Never forget - Whites are to blame for black behavior." What would we do without such inspired defense? How would we ever set aside our misplaced sense of racial guilt without Austard's guilt-tripping us into it?