Beullogeo's

On Thursday the 2nd of April, the G20 are holding a summit in Great Britain. The G20’s own website (http://www.g20.org/) states that the Summit of the global financial elite (or at least their visible stooges) will focus on

“driving forward work between advanced and emerging economies to tackle the international financial and economic crisis, restore worldwide financial stability, lead the international economic recovery and secure a sustainable future for all countries”

Re-reading that, taking into account the propaganda ‘spin’ utilised by the masters of the lie, it can be seen that the G20 Summit is nothing less than a meeting to further consolidate global finacial integration under the control of the banking dynasties. The financial crisis is a wholly staged manipulation of international finance, which the G20 will use as an excuse to bring about their ‘solution’ to the contrived ‘problem’ – removal of financial power from sovereign nations with power passing to Global bodies such as the World Bank, IMF etc.

The propaganda piece continues

“The financial markets and the world economy continue to face serious global challenges and the severity of the crisis and ongoing uncertainties demonstrate the need for urgent action. During the United Kingdoms Chair, the immediate priority will be to gain further agreements for a concerted, co-ordinated international response.”

What could that ‘co-ordinated international response’ possibly be? Could it be the completion of the North American Union with the merging of the US Dollar, Canadian Dollar, and Mexican Peso into the Amero? Maybe it will be the merging of the fledgling NAU with the EU into the Transatlantic Union? You can gurantee that loss of sovereignty will be involved and centralisation of finacial power into the hands of the fathers of usury will result. All this will naturally be presented as being for the good of the people.
To continue

“The G-20 will need to send a strong signal that it is prepared to take whatever further actions are necessary to stabilise the financial system and to provide further macroeconomic support.” (World Bank, Global Common Currency to pave the way for the abolition of all currencies)…

“At the same time, the G-20 must commit to maintaining open trade and investment, to avoid a retreat to protectionism, and direct necessary additional support to emerging markets and developing countries.” (ie eroding National Law in favour of International Law to hand over taxation to the embryonic Global Government, and giving the emerging Global Army (NATO) authority to crush Nations which attempt to protect their people by controlling trade tariffs)

“The G-20 should also lay the foundations to move beyond the crisis to a sustainable recovery.” (more Globalist propaganda) “In 2009, it will be important to understand the roots of the international financial crisis and identify the lessons that we can learn to ensure that a crisis of this kind does not happen again.” (Sadly this doesn’t mean scrapping the Speculative Stock Markets and punishing the International Banking Mafia for Crimes against Humanity – it means rewarding these despots. Hows that for Orwellian Newspeak?)

“The G-20 should develop proposals that will restore global growth in the medium term, including the unwinding of emergency measures taken in response to the crisis. In addition, we should also make progress on long-term issues such as climate change and international development.” Aha! Climate Change! Now there we have the justification for Global Taxation to deal with the hoax problem of man-made Global Warming. Apart from the military weather manipulation via the spraying known as Chemtrails and the HAARP project, as used against the victims in New Orleans and Thailand, Climate Change is NOT man-made. The whole point of the Climate Change scare is to justify a Global Tax, administered by a Global Government/Police/Army/Bank etc. Hey ho, New World Order, here we go!

“In line with usual practice, the organisation of the G-20 events during the year will be shared between the Ministry of Finance and the Central Bank. We are looking forward to working closely and drawing on the valuable experience of our Troika colleagues, Brazil and South Korea, and the other G-20 members.” (And again more Globalist claptrap)

This is just a brief analysis of the propaganda of the G-20. It is to be expected that the controlled opposition will riot, thus justifying further militarising and de-Bobby-fying the British Police, but that is for another piece…

Isn't it great living in a democracy? How lucky are the people of England, nay all of Europe, that we live in open, free societies, where Government exists to serve the people. We look at nations such as Zimbabwe with great pity for they do not share our fortune - they live under tyranny and surveillance. How truly grateful we should be that we live in a veritable paradise of freedom, tolerance and opportunity. Right? Well, actually no.

Whatever happens politically and economically in Great Britain, is mirrored across all the other nations of the prison bloc known as the European Union. Through international Fabian implementation groups, such as Common Purpose, all the formerly free countries which have become entangled in the internationalist anti-human web of neo-Soviet enslavement, are losing their freedoms and identities at an alarming rate.

To focus on just one example of the on-going Orwellian erosion of freedom, the Bnai British puppet regime in Westminster is pushing for a complete end to privacy on the internet. Who are the targets? Is the Stasi electronic jackboot to be focused upon resurgent Fenian Terrorists? Considering that all MI5 would need to do to keep up-to-date on the movements of the IRA is to look in their files to see how well they are following orders, then no, the focus must be elsewhere, on people who may actually constitute a real threat to the anti-British establishment.

The great danger to the State is, apparently, social networking sites such as Facebook. Why are the establishment interested in the trivial conversations and associations of the general public? According to Home Office Minister Vernon Coaker, Social Networking sites need to be monitored and recorded in order for the Security Services to "...maintain a capability and a capacity to deal with crime and issues of national security..." Yes, you've read that right, MI5 needs to know who you are chatting to, what your interests are, what your favourite films are etc ad nauseum, as knowledge of these facts is essential to National Security.

This is another nail in the coffin of privacy in Great Britain. The nation is now awash with CCTV surveillance, both State and Privately operated static CCTV cameras, and in the form of mobile CCTV vans operated by the Police and Local Authorities. There are petty regulations which allow utility companies to enter private property and leave again without giving notice to the tenants. The MI5 listening posts at Rugby and Fylingdales, amongst others, listen to every telephone conversation within Great Britain, read every SMS text message and email, and monitor all internet activity. The technology is in place to record every recordable aspect of our lives.

'This security is here to help us and protect us from Terrorism' so goes the mantra. Well, violent crime has never been worse, the Real IRA can kill with no problems or trace (although of course that is a State operation anyway), heroin dealing and the pimping of prostitutes are rife, yet the perpetrators are seldom caught, and never adequately dealt with. No, this surveillance is not here to make us safe, it is to ensure we get used to having no privacy, no rights, no freedom, and become unthinking expendable slaves, who exist only for the benefit of the ruling elite.

This latest intrusion is just another step towards finishing the panopticon which Great Britain is fast becoming. By tacitly accepting this obscenity, we the people, are allowing our enslavers to destroy all we hold dear. We are no safer for these measures, in fact we are less safe, as all this data recording opens the doors for unimaginable fraud and civil liberty abuses. We have to wake up and realise that we are many, our abusers are few. They cannot enslave us without our passive cooperation. So, the choice is simple, shall we sleepwalk into absolute servitude, or refuse to cooperate and thus collapse their house of cards? The choice is ours. Time is of the essence. Either we stop this Sovietisation now, or condemn ourselves and following gnerations to suffer in perpetuity.

In The idiocy of Kevin MacDonald Auster takes offense at MacDonald's statement:

the racial Zionist movement that dominates the politics of Israel today

Auster is so angered by this that he attacks MacDonald personally. The problem, beyond this childish tantrum, is that MacDonald, in terms of Western norms, is entirely correct. Read for example Weston's analysis in The Israeli Election. Auster, who willfully ignores the disparity between what is considered "racism" in the West and normal in israel, can't help but list "well-known facts" that indicate only one thing: that racial zionism (Jabotinskyism) does not dominate israel as completely as he would like.

In throwing his tantrum Auster at least brings attention to some excellent writing of MacDonald's, including his recent post at VDare Memories Of Madison—My Life In The New Left, and his December 2008 TOO essay Ben Stein's Expelled: Was Darwinism a Necessary Condition for the Holocaust? where he provides some idea how far today's racial zionism goes beyond what is considered acceptable for today's White Westerners.

Auster here demonstrates two common tactics of pro-jewish argument: 1) throw nasty, personal insults at someone who says something you don't like, and 2) answer a complaint about some jewish disparity by claiming jews aren't powerful enough.

Tactic 2 is related to a tactic even more frequently used in similar circumstances: 3) answer a complaint about some jewish disparity by claiming that the complainer is insanely suggesting jewish power is absolute. In both cases examples are usually offered to demonstrate that jews aren't doing everything they could to further their own interests, or are doing something that harms themselves.

What these tactics seek to avoid is any acknowledgement that the disparity in question is real, and that that in itself is harm and injustice enough to those of us who aren't jews.

For other recent examples of these tactics see Melanie Phillips' Obama prepares to throw Israel to the Wolves, or the comments made by Anonymous to Whose Country is This Anyway?

What makes this phenomena especially annoying is that jews are, as a group, incredibly sensitive to disparities everywhere around them concerning the rights, wealth, and power of everyone, including themselves, at least when they feel victimized. However, when asked to face disparities that reflect negatively on themselves they abruptly become deaf, dumb, blind, and exhibit ZERO intellectual honesty. What's more, they treat anyone who presses a complaint against them as a mortal enemy. It seems to me a good example of projection.

At this point some philo-semite inevitably shows up to say, "yeah, but that's perfectly understandable because <insert sob story here>, and after all we're allies!" To which I say, no. The intellectually and morally bankrupt tactics described above are not only alien and inscrutable to White Western minds. They are indefensible. Two wrongs don't make a right. These tactics don't reflect the attitude of an ally. They reflect at best a self-aware and self-absorbed Other, and at worst a mortal enemy. In either case we are not obligated, intellectually or morally, to tolerate these tactics or the people using them.

After months of advertising, Alex Jones' new film, the Obama Deception, is out. The trailer proclaimed it an an exposure of the lies of Obama. I made sure I got a copy as soon as it came out, and having watched it twice now, I would like to share my opinions.

The film sees a welcome break from Alex Jones' usual approach. Previously his films have concentrated on the evils of the Republican Party, with Bush and Cheney being treated as demi-devils. He has always managed to target the politicians but not the puppet masters behind them. I am very pleased to say that the Obama Deception has not followed down this line.

The new film looks at who Obama has taken with him into the White House - contrary to his endlessly repeated promise of being the bringer of 'Change', the new President has surrounded himself with Bilderberg, Trilateral Commission and Council on Foreign Relations members. The Obama Deception looks behind the politicians to the organisations which pull the strings. This is refreshing.

Alex Jones also examines the broken promises of the new puppets, including promise to:

i) bring US soldiers home (30,000 more SO FAR have been sent to the Middle-East/Central Asia region);

ii) not let the banks profit from the multi-trillion dollar 'Stimulus' bailout (they have profited beyond what they were given and are actually reloaning money to the US and charging interest!);

iii) end the influence of lobbyists (more lobbyists and political sponsors are entrenched than in any previous regime EVER)

The list of broken promise and outright lies grows daily, so these three will do as examples.

The main emphasis on the film is not in fact Obama, but the shadowy elite who control him. This is commendable. Previous Infowars films have paid too much attention to personalities and character flaws. Obama's birth outside the USA is certainly a point of legal interest, but the power of his owners is what we must be fully aware of.

The Obama Deception looks at the CFR, Trilateral Commission, Bilderberg Group, Federal Reserve and other Zionist fronts. It highlights key Zionists without actually labelling them as such, and uses the term 'Anglo-American Imperialism' rather than Zionism. Anyone with an open-mind can see who these people really are. We don't need spoon-feeding. The Rothschilds, Rockerfellers and European Monarchies share the same bloodlines and political ideologies. Every single one of them is a Cabbalist and Talmud-hugger. The CFR, TC and BG are vehicles these supremacists use to organise their Goy agents. The fact that Alex Jones doesn't go into this is interesting, but anyone who does his/her research will soon find the real source of power.

The film does whitewash the Zionist criminal network, doesn't mention that the coming war for Greater Israel, which will see the destruction of Iran, and many millions of ordinary people, but I suppose given a 2 hour time limit, it can't go into everything!

The Obama Deception is an excellent film. I would advise everyone to download the film, make as many copies as possible and distribute them. We need to break the illusion that politicians have any say in running the USA or any nation, so long as the money power is controlled by private banks. Agitate for the setting up of Credit Unions, and alternative economic systems.

Be aware that the real enemy of humanity is the Talmudic ideology of Zionism, which is manifest most visibly in the banking system and stock exchanges. Do your own research, look at how this evil has corrupted the world we live in. Educate everyone about the true masters. Most importantly, take to heart the fact that whilst no one can do everything, everyone can do something.

In JournoList: Inside the echo chamber, at Politico, Michael Calderone writes (my emphasis):

For the past two years, several hundred left-leaning bloggers, political reporters, magazine writers, policy wonks and academics have talked stories and compared notes in an off-the-record online meeting space called JournoList.

Proof of a vast liberal media conspiracy?

Not at all, says Ezra Klein, the 24-year-old American Prospect blogging wunderkind who formed JournoList in February 2007. “Basically,” he says, “it’s just a list where journalists and policy wonks can discuss issues freely.”

But some of the journalists who participate in the online discussion say — off the record, of course — that it has been a great help in their work. On the record, The New Yorker’s Jeffrey Toobin acknowledged that a Talk of the Town piece — he won’t say which one — got its start in part via a conversation on JournoList. And JLister Eric Alterman, The Nation writer and CUNY professor, said he’s seen discussions that start on the list seep into the world beyond.

“I’m very lazy about writing when I’m not getting paid,” Alterman said. “So if I take the trouble to write something in any detail on the list, I tend to cannibalize it. It doesn’t surprise me when I see things on the list on people’s blogs.”

Last April, criticism of ABC’s handling of a Democratic presidential debate took shape on JList before morphing into an open letter to the network, signed by more than 40 journalists and academics — many of whom are JList members.

But beyond these specific examples, it’s hard to trace JList’s influence in the media, because so few JListers are willing to talk on the record about it.

POLITICO contacted nearly three dozen current JList members for this story. The majority either declined to comment or didn’t respond to interview requests — and then returned to JList to post items on why they wouldn’t be talking to POLITICO about what goes on there.In an e-mail, Klein said he understands that the JList’s off-the-record rule “makes it seems secretive.” But he insisted that JList discussions have to be off the record in order to “ensure that folks feel safe giving off-the-cuff analysis and instant reactions.”

One byproduct of that secrecy: For all its high-profile membership — which includes Nobel Prize-winning columnist Paul Krugman; staffers from Newsweek, POLITICO, Huffington Post, The New Republic, The Nation and The New Yorker; policy wonks, academics and bloggers such as Klein and Matthew Yglesias — JList itself has received almost no attention from the media.

A LexisNexis search for JournoList reveals exactly nothing. Slate’s Mickey Kaus, a nonmember, may be the only professional writer to have referred to it “in print” more than once — albeit dismissively, as the “Klein Klub.”

While members may talk freely about JList at, say, a Columbia Heights house party, there’s a “Fight Club”-style code of silence when it comes to discussing it for publication.

But a handful of JList members agreed to talk for this story — if only to push back against the perception that the group is some sort of secret, left-wing cabal.

Several members volunteered that JList is unlike listservs such as Townhouse, the private, activist-oriented group formed by liberal blogger Matt Stoller.

“No one’s pushing an agenda,” said Toobin.

Toobin joined JList about a year ago, and he said that he had to get a new e-mail address just for JList in order to keep up with the sheer volume of commentary that appears there every day. The frequent disputes among members, he said, are “what’s most entertaining on the list.”

John Judis, a senior editor at The New Republic, described JList in an e-mail as “a virtual coffeehouse” where participants get a chance to talk and argue.

“There is probably general agreement on the stupidity of today’s GOP,” he said. “But beyond that, I would say there is wide disagreement on trade, Israel, how exactly we got into this recession/depression and how to get out of it, the brilliance of various punk bands that I have never heard of, and on whether, at any given moment, the Obama administration is doing the right thing.”

But aren’t there enough forums for arguing about domestic and foreign policy — or even for partaking in the more idiosyncratic JList debates about the merits of Bruce Springsteen and whether The New Republic is liberal enough? And do those debates really have to happen behind a veil of secrecy?

“It’s sort of a chance to float ideas and kind of toss them around, back and forth, and determine if they have any value,” said New Republic associate editor Eve Fairbanks, “and get people’s input on them before you put them on a blog.”

Indeed, the advantage of JList, members say, is that it provides a unique forum for getting in touch with historians and policy people who provide journalists with a knowledge base for articles and blog posts.

Yglesias, who writes an eponymous blog hosted by the Center for American Progress, noted that “the combined membership has tentacles of knowledge that reach everywhere,” adding that “you can toss out a question about Japan or whatever and get some different points of view.”

Alterman said it’s important that there are “people with genuine expertise” on the list.

“For me, it’s enormously useful because I don’t like to spend my time reading blogs and reading up-to-the-minute political minutia,” he said. “This list allows me to make sure I’m not missing anything important.”

POLITICO’s Mike Allen, Ben Smith and Lisa Lerer are on the list. “The roster includes some of the savviest authorities on everything from behavioral economics to Ben’s Chili Bowl,” Allen said. “It’s a window into a world of passionate experts — an hourly graduate education.”

Said another JLister: “I don’t know any other place where working journalists, policy wonks and academics who write about current politics and political history routinely communicate with one another.”

But what if all the private exchanges got leaked?

That’s been the subject of some JList conversation, too, as members discuss the Weekly Standard’s publication of a 2006 e-mail posted to the private China Security Listserv by diplomat Charles Freeman, who last week withdrew his name from consideration for a top intelligence job.

Michael Goldfarb, a former McCain staffer and conservative blogger who published the e-mail, was not part of the China list and therefore hadn’t agreed to any off-the-record rules.

Asked about the existence of conservative listservs, Goldfarb said they’re much less prevalent.

“There is nothing comparable on the right. E-mail conversations among bloggers, journalists and experts on our side tend to be ad hoc,” Goldfarb said. “The JournoList thing always struck me as a little creepy.”

Kaus, too, has seemed put off by the whole idea, once talking on BloggingHeads about how the list “seems contrary to the spirit of the Web.”

“You don’t want to create a whole separate, like, private blog that only the elite bloggers can go into, and then what you present to the public is sort of the propaganda you’ve decided to go public with,” Kaus argued.

But Time’s Joe Klein, who acknowledged being on JList and several other listservs, said in an e-mail that “they’re valuable in the way that candid conversations with colleagues and experts always are.” Defending the off-the-record rule, Klein said that “candor is essential and can only be guaranteed by keeping these conversations private.”

And then Klein — speaking like the JLister he is — said there wasn’t “anything more that I can or want to say about the subject.”

Nearly every name in this article is jewish, even the outsiders, Kaus and Goldfarb. A preponderance of the signers of the aforementioned open letter to ABC are jewish as well.

Are the JournoList "liberals" embarassed with the lack of diversity in their cabal? Are they concerned how their ethnic networking appears to "liberal" anti-racists?

Not likely. Diversity is a weapon of ethnic warfare intended for use solely against Whites. Likewise anti-racism. If these jewish journalists were White, "liberals" would viciously attack their cabal as a form of racist "white privilege". Jews however are treated to a different standard.

Keep in mind now, the existence of this cabal in no way substantiates crazy conspiracy theories and old canards about jewish media influence. It is nothing special. There are dozens, maybe hundreds of cabals just like this one, all full of influential jews who disagree widely about what's best for jews, how to defend israel, whether Bernie Madoff deserves life in prison or death, who to pin the financial meltdown on, which holocaust movie deserves the Oscar, etc.

When Great Britain was an ethnically-pure and culturally-sound nation, this kind of disgraceful behaviour would never have occurred. Our military were respected as defenders of the Nation, of the People. They had not been humiliated and reduced to the status of Policemen for the Globalists. They were honourable and courageous people who passionately believed in and loved their country. They epitomised the active pursuance of the creed of the 14 Words.

Now, many servicemen and women are leaving the Armed Forces in droves, sickened by how the services have been debased. The Zionists who run this country have targeted the military as it has always been the backbone of the nation. US-based Zionist criminal Henry Kissinger summed up the attitude of the Jewish pariah mindset when he described Soldiers as "dumb, stupid animals to be used".

Now alongside the disgusting attitude of the establishment, our servicemen and women are subjected to abuse from resident dual-passport-holding foreigners. These outsiders have the option of leaving our shores and returning to the open sewers from which they slithered. If this country was sane, the choice would be made for them and they would be on their merry way.

Poor Britain, poor Europe. This is the fate awaiting all nations unless the scum behind the drive to complete Zionist Globalisation are not stopped immediately. Pride through National Freedom or genocide through cultural and racial mongrelisation - that is the choice.

Lord Ahmed, the anti-British Muslim Peer, is free. He crashed his car when texting on his mobile phone - killing an innocent native European, Martyn Gombar. An ordinary person without the support of the jihadi militia the State so love to fawn over, would have been banned from driving and incarcerated for a lengthy gaol term. Oddly, this friend of Elizardbeth Windsor, (arch traitor and 'royal' parasite) and member of the ruling Labour Party, has not received the punishment which would be expected by the average Brit. Why is this I wonder? Why has this worthless piece of sh*t been allowed to get away with murder?

The killing of 28 year old Martyn Gombar by Nazir Ahmed leaves 2 children fatherless. In modern multi-culti Britain, destroying European families is acceptable, but punishing high-placed, nay any aliens, is forbidden.

Nazir Ahmed is the Labour Peer who blackmailed Westminster by stating that if they allowed the Dutch MP, Geert Wilders to enter the UK, that he would mobilise 10,000 Muslims to 'deal with' him. He has now progressed from threatening to have someone killed by a mob under his control, to actually doing it himself. What a shining example of British Democracy and Tolerance he is. (See more HERE)

Sixty Years ago our forefathers were lied to by the Monarchy and their Government into fighting a fratricidal war. They were told that they would be fighting to keep the British Nation free from foreign rule, and that they would be preserving and defending our culture and race. Now the likes of Jacob Stravinsky, Nazir Ahmed and Trevor Philips dictate what we can say, do and think.

If our forefathers had known how their heroism would be betrayed, and their descendants turned into slaves of the Zionist-Communitarian Globalist mafia, it would have been the Churchills of this land who would have been butchered and not our brothers and sisters on the European mainland.

Whilst it is vital that we do not get bogged down in history, that we fight in the present to secure the future, it is important that we never forget the heroes of Europe who fell for our people in generations past. One such hero and martyr is Jose Antonio Primo de Rivera.

Jose Antonio was a true radical with a vision for a glorious future for all the peoples of Europe, not only for the Spanish. His life was cruelly cut short and his place in history side-lined by El Caudillo, Francisco Franco - a man who compromised the revolution and eventually betrayed it by allowing the despicable Juan Carlos (Los Juancar!) back into the Spanish political and cultural arena. Franco wasn't fit to lead the Spanish people, as he proved by supporting the Monarchy.

The true heroes of the revolution were the likes of Jose Antonio, Ramiro Ledesma Ramos and Emilio Mola Vidal. Let their memories burn in your hearts, not as figures from history, but as visionaries and inspirations for a future Europe, Nationally Free and Socially Just.

Venezuela is yet again under attack by the self-righteous racial supremacists who control America from their daemonic state of Israel. What has the Bolivarian Republic done now to outrage the Zionist mafia? Well, it seems some vicious "aren't-I-a-Semite" has desecrated the central synagogue in Caracas.

Horror of horrors, the enemies of Israel stormed the temple and daubed slogans on the walls in protest against the Jewish slaughter of Palestinians in their own country. A group of 15 armed men broke into the heavily fortified sinner-gog, climbing over electrified walls unseen (even though the city streets were crowded), daubed a few slogans and generally messed the place up, before escaping without leaving a trace of who they were! Although a treasure trove of Gold was in the temple, Nothing was stolen. No-one was hurt. No permanent damage was done.

Isn't it just a little convenient for the Pariah 'state' of Israel, that individuals within the territory of the free nation of Venezuela should commit anti-Jewish acts, at exactly the time that Israelis are indulging themselves in an orgy of Satanic genocide against their neighbours, and are fulfilling the goals of the Protocols of Zion in enslaving the world through their control of the international financial system, media and their puppet regimes in the UN, USA, NATO, EU etc?

Isn't it also strange that the mysterious invaders of the temple managed to escape without detection, even, according to the Rabbis, managing to steal the CCTV tapes which, if they hadn't miraculously found it, would have provided evidential proof of who the attackers were. These infamous anti-Semites were careful to lay the Menorahs, Scrolls and other 'sacred' items neatly on the floor of the temple, stealing and damaging Nothing!

This should be a joke, of the same level of absurdity as the tales of gold teeth being removed from the residents of Belsen and melted into gold bars. Or even more laughable, of human skin being made into lampshades! These lies are not amusing because they have been used as an excuse to murder non-Jews all for the benefit of satisfying Zionist blood-lust.

Hugo Chavez has angered the Zionist Globalist mafia by refusing to worship at the altar of Mammon. Indeed he has committed the unforgivable crime of working relentlessly to better the lot of the people of Venezuela. He is a Nationalist Hero who by defying the Zionist rulers of the USA, EU, Occupied Palestine and other territories under the Zionist heel, has made a stand for us all.

Stand by Chavez. His fight is our fight. Victory against Zionism means freedom for us all.

For more on the ludicrous lies of the Organised Jewry, visit:
http://endwhiteguilt.blogspot.com

If the Israel Lobby is a myth, then why is obsequience to israel a bipartisan litmus test for US officials? "Are you now, or have you ever been, a critic of israel?"

On 5 March 2009 the Washington Times reported Foreign ties of nominee questioned:

The director of national intelligence, Dennis C. Blair, last Thursday named Mr. [Chas W.] Freeman, a veteran former diplomat, to the chairmanship of the National Intelligence Council, known inside the government as the NIC. In that job, Mr. Freeman will have access to some of America's most closely guarded secrets and be charged with overseeing the drafting of the consensus view of all 16 intelligence agencies.

His selection was praised by some who noted his articulateness and experience as U.S. ambassador to Saudi Arabia and a senior envoy to China and other nations. But it sparked concerns among some members of Congress from both parties, who asked the Office of the Director of National Intelligence's inspector general, Edward McGuire, to investigate Mr. Freeman's potential conflicts of interest.

Why didn't these kind of questions sink Rahm Emanuel? After all:

Mr. Emanuel is arguably the second most powerful man in the country and, just a few days into his tenure, already one of the highest-profile chiefs of staff in recent memory.

Renowned as a fierce partisan, he has been an ardent ambassador to Republicans, including Mr. Obama’s defeated rival, Senator John McCain of Arizona. He has exerted influence on countless decisions; in meetings, administration officials say, Mr. Obama often allows him to speak first and last.

“You can see how he listens and reacts to Rahm,” said Ron Klain, the chief of staff to Vice President Joseph R. Biden Jr. “You can see that his opinion is being shaped.”

Emanuel has strong foreign ties. Haaretz writes U.S. Jews laud Obama pick of Rahm Emanuel for chief of staff:

"Rep. Emanuel is also a good friend of Israel, coming from good Irgun stock, davening at an Orthodox synagogue, and sending his children to Jewish day schools," Daroff concluded.

Ira N. Forman, Executive Director of the National Jewish Democratic Council (NJDC), echoed Daroff's approval, saying in a statement Thursday that "Obama made an outstanding selection. Emanuel has been a forceful and effective leader within the Democratic Party. His voting record and leadership in support of the U.S.-Israel relationship are outstanding."

"Emanuel has deep Jewish roots and strong ties to the Jewish community. Emanuel, the son of an Israeli immigrant, has a proven commitment to Israel's security and served as civilian volunteer on an Israeli military base during the Persian Gulf War of 1991," the statement continued.

"Good irgun stock" means his jewish "faith" is very strong. His middle name is Israel.

On 10 March 2009 Foreign Policy blog The Cable posted a letter from Freeman explaining his withdrawal from the position, Freeman speaks out on his exit (my emphasis):

You will by now have seen the statement by Director of National Intelligence Dennis Blair reporting that I have withdrawn my previous acceptance of his invitation to chair the National Intelligence Council.

I have concluded that the barrage of libelous distortions of my record would not cease upon my entry into office. The effort to smear me and to destroy my credibility would instead continue. I do not believe the National Intelligence Council could function effectively while its chair was under constant attack by unscrupulous people with a passionate attachment to the views of a political faction in a foreign country. I agreed to chair the NIC to strengthen it and protect it against politicization, not to introduce it to efforts by a special interest group to assert control over it through a protracted political campaign.

As those who know me are well aware, I have greatly enjoyed life since retiring from government. Nothing was further from my mind than a return to public service. When Admiral Blair asked me to chair the NIC I responded that I understood he was “asking me to give my freedom of speech, my leisure, the greater part of my income, subject myself to the mental colonoscopy of a polygraph, and resume a daily commute to a job with long working hours and a daily ration of political abuse.” I added that I wondered “whether there wasn’t some sort of downside to this offer.” I was mindful that no one is indispensable; I am not an exception. It took weeks of reflection for me to conclude that, given the unprecedentedly challenging circumstances in which our country now finds itself abroad and at home, I had no choice but accept the call to return to public service. I thereupon resigned from all positions that I had held and all activities in which I was engaged. I now look forward to returning to private life, freed of all previous obligations.

I am not so immodest as to believe that this controversy was about me rather than issues of public policy. These issues had little to do with the NIC and were not at the heart of what I hoped to contribute to the quality of analysis available to President Obama and his administration. Still, I am saddened by what the controversy and the manner in which the public vitriol of those who devoted themselves to sustaining it have revealed about the state of our civil society. It is apparent that we Americans cannot any longer conduct a serious public discussion or exercise independent judgment about matters of great importance to our country as well as to our allies and friends.

The libels on me and their easily traceable email trails show conclusively that there is a powerful lobby determined to prevent any view other than its own from being aired, still less to factor in American understanding of trends and events in the Middle East. The tactics of the Israel Lobby plumb the depths of dishonor and indecency and include character assassination, selective misquotation, the willful distortion of the record, the fabrication of falsehoods, and an utter disregard for the truth. The aim of this Lobby is control of the policy process through the exercise of a veto over the appointment of people who dispute the wisdom of its views, the substitution of political correctness for analysis, and the exclusion of any and all options for decision by Americans and our government other than those that it favors.

There is a special irony in having been accused of improper regard for the opinions of foreign governments and societies by a group so clearly intent on enforcing adherence to the policies of a foreign government – in this case, the government of Israel. I believe that the inability of the American public to discuss, or the government to consider, any option for US policies in the Middle East opposed by the ruling faction in Israeli politics has allowed that faction to adopt and sustain policies that ultimately threaten the existence of the state of Israel. It is not permitted for anyone in the United States to say so. This is not just a tragedy for Israelis and their neighbors in the Middle East; it is doing widening damage to the national security of the United States.

The outrageous agitation that followed the leak of my pending appointment will be seen by many to raise serious questions about whether the Obama administration will be able to make its own decisions about the Middle East and related issues. I regret that my willingness to serve the new administration has ended by casting doubt on its ability to consider, let alone decide what policies might best serve the interests of the United States rather than those of a Lobby intent on enforcing the will and interests of a foreign government.

In the court of public opinion, unlike a court of law, one is guilty until proven innocent. The speeches from which quotations have been lifted from their context are available for anyone interested in the truth to read. The injustice of the accusations made against me has been obvious to those with open minds. Those who have sought to impugn my character are uninterested in any rebuttal that I or anyone else might make.

Still, for the record: I have never sought to be paid or accepted payment from any foreign government, including Saudi Arabia or China, for any service, nor have I ever spoken on behalf of a foreign government, its interests, or its policies. I have never lobbied any branch of our government for any cause, foreign or domestic. I am my own man, no one else’s, and with my return to private life, I will once again – to my pleasure – serve no master other than myself. I will continue to speak out as I choose on issues of concern to me and other Americans.

I retain my respect and confidence in President Obama and DNI Blair. Our country now faces terrible challenges abroad as well as at home. Like all patriotic Americans, I continue to pray that our president can successfully lead us in surmounting them.

Later that same day Ben Smith at Politico posted Freeman hits 'Israel lobby' on way out:

Charles W. Freeman Jr.'s abrupt withdrawal from his appointment as chairman of the National Intelligence Council came after he drew fire on a number of fronts - including questions about his financial ties to China and Saudi Arabia.

But the most heated opposition came from supporters of Israel - and Freeman's departure shows Obama's reluctance to signal a dramatic change to a U.S. policy in the Middle East that centers on standing beside Israel.

Throughout his presidential campaign, Obama jettisoned aides and backed off statements that appeared to imply a change in the Bush Administration's firm support for hawkish Israeli governments.

On 12 March the Jerusalem Post, in Freeman blames 'Israel lobby' for ouster from NIC, wrote (my emphasis):

Critics of the selection of the former US ambassador to Saudi Arabia - among them members of Congress - cited statements he had made harshly criticizing Israel, praising Saudi Arabia and seeming to side with the Chinese government over democracy advocates, as well as business and financial ties to China and Saudi Arabia, in calling for Freeman to be denied the position overseeing the compilation of the US intelligence community's National Intelligence Estimates.

In his statement, Freeman also said, "The outrageous agitation that followed the leak of my pending appointment will be seen by many to raise serious questions about whether the Obama administration will be able to make its own decisions about the Middle East and related issues."

Those questions, which rebounded through the blogosphere Wednesday, have led some to argue that Israel advocates who believe they helped their cause by seeing Freeman shut out have only scored a Pyrrhic victory.

"The perception, almost universally held, that he was brought down because he is a strong and vocal opponent of Israel's West Bank and settlement policies, is not good for the Jewish community and the pro-Israel community in particular," M.J. Rosenberg of the Israel Policy Forum, wrote on his blog, pointing out that criticism of Freeman first surfaced in the pro-Israel community.

He told The Jerusalem Post that the community has been trying to argue that its alleged power is a myth, yet it will now be perceived as "bringing down" a top government appointee.

Prominent blogger Andrew Sullivan, not known to be a harsh Israel critic, called Freeman's "cardinal sin" his willingness to blame Israel for the situation it finds itself in in the Middle East.

"This is the third rail no one is allowed to touch and have access to real power in Washington," he wrote. "I find the hysterical bullying of this man to be repulsive."

Even some mainstream media outlets have picked up on this theme. Reuters called the controversy a "a test case for the strength of Washington's right-wing pro-Israel lobby" since remarks critical of Israel have previously been "virtually taboo in official Washington, whose elected leaders - or those running for office - tend to stress unflagging support for the Jewish state."

Still, pro-Israel groups who opposed Freeman's appointment openly welcomed the news that he would not be taking the post.

Ira Forman, executive director of the National Jewish Democratic Council, said that Freeman's comments blaming the Israel lobby only proved that he was ill-suited for the job.

"I understand someone being upset if people oppose an appointment, but to lash out at what appeared to be a conspiracy in his mind was not the type of temperament one would hope for in someone in such a position," he said.

Obviously Freeman's foreign ties weren't the real problem, it was his criticism of israel. And this was true before he wrote this letter about the Israel Lobby. Rahm Emanuel wasn't subjected to a different standard. It was the same standard: "what's good for the jewish community?", as M.J. Rosenberg would put it.

Ira Forman, who was quoted praising Emanuel above, here gleefully spells out the fate of anyone who notices that what's good for the jewish community isn't necessarily good for their own. If you speak out, you'll be punished. If you object to that, you'll be smeared as "crazy". Jewish power is a myth. If you doubt that, an invisible, imaginary, non-existent jewish conspiracy will crush you.

In related news, on 11 March 2009 AP published Officials: Iran does not have key nuclear material (my emphasis):

Iran does not yet have any highly enriched uranium, the fuel needed to make a nuclear warhead, two top U.S. intelligence officials told Congress Tuesday, disputing a claim by an Israeli official.

U.S. National Intelligence Director Dennis Blair and Defense Intelligence Agency Director Lt. Gen. Michael Maples said Tuesday that Iran has only low-enriched uranium - which would need to be refined into highly enriched uranium before it can fuel a warhead. Neither officials said there were indications that refining has occurred.

Their comments disputed a claim made last weekend by Israel's top intelligence military official, who said Iran has crossed a technical threshold and is now capable of producing atomic weapons.

The claim made by Israeli Maj. Gen. Amos Yadlin runs counter to estimates by U.S. intelligence that the earliest Iran could produce a weapon is 2010, with some analysts saying it is more likely that it is 2015.

Maples said the United States and Israel are interpreting the same facts, but arriving at different conclusions.

"The Israelis are far more concerned about it," Maples told the Senate Armed Services Committee.

Blair also stood firm behind former U.S. Ambassador Charles Freeman, his pick for a top analysis job, despite strong congressional criticism.

Freeman, who was U.S. ambassador to Saudi Arabia during the Persian Gulf war, had harshly criticized the Israeli government, the Iraq war and the war on terrorism in general.

A policy council Freeman headed also has been criticized for some ties to foreign governments, including Saudi Arabia and China. Blair's inspector general is investigating those ties while Freeman works with ethics advisers to scrub his personal finances for potential conflicts of interest.

Blair and Maples will very soon be following Freeman. Then Rahm Emanuel can tap Ira Forman or someone else Ira Forman approves of as National Intelligence Director. Then Obomba will get the "correct" intel. Then he can bomb bomb bomb bomb bomb iran. And then jews everywhere will live happily ever after.

American Goy notes the relative silence of the media and other curious details in Irony overload- the strange case of Charles W. "Chas" Freeman.

UPDATE 12 March 2009: On 11 March 2009 American Jewish Committee Executive Director David A. Harris issued the following statement:

Apparently, Chas Freeman can dish it out but can't take it.

Like all appointments to key national security positions, Freeman's merited public scrutiny. His views on "Abdullah the Great," on Israel, on September 11, and on Tiananmen Square were a matter of public record, and respected officials on both sides of the aisle raised legitimate concerns about them.

Ambassador Freeman could have defended those beliefs in an open debate. Instead, he chose to fire off nasty emails scapegoating the "Israel Lobby" for his own decision to withdraw.

The only "libels" and "smears" here are Freeman's tired cliches about a nefarious "Israel Lobby" that stifles debate. In truth, it's Freeman, a charter member of the Saudi Fan Club, who wanted the debate to be silenced - since he found himself on the losing side once it started.

If Freeman's conspiratorial rant reflects the quality of his analysis and his temperament under pressure, it's just further evidence that he wasn't the right man for this critical job.

This statement, and especially the last sentence, sounds just like Ira Forman, executive director of the National Jewish Democratic Council, already quoted above. It's as if they're conspiring or something. But that's just conspiratorial talk.

Scapegoating, in my dictionary, means blaming someone who isn't responsible. When criticism is aimed at any other powerful entity it's called "speaking truth to power". When jewish power is criticized many jews insinuate the critic is insane, others revel in crushing the critic's windpipe, and a few "self-hating jews" affirm his criticism.

On 6 March 2009 Richard Silverstein wrote Chas. Freeman: Aipac Smells Blood in the Water (links in original):

Admiral Dennis Blair’s appointment of Chas. Freeman as chair of the National Intelligence Council becomes more troubled by the day. Not because of any real taint on Ambassador Freeman’s record, but because Aipac and its Congressional water carriers are upping the ante day by day in a campaign to oust him due to his strongly critical views about the Israeli Occupation.

His critics veil their criticism in an attack on Freeman’s close ties to Chinese and Saudi business and government interests, but make no mistake–Freeman’s sin is his outspokenness on Israel and his sympathies for Palestinian suffering.

This coordinated attack fits Aipac’s modus operandi to a tee. First, you will probably not hear the group’s name directly associated with the assault. The phone calls go from Aipac headquarters to their mostly Republican minions on the Hill. But it’s entirely possible that unlike the Manchurian Candidate, Aipac doesn’t even need to activate their operatives. They’ve been so indoctrinated that the Congress members know what is expected of them and they start the campaign themselves.

And by the by, Jim Lobe notes notes that most of the seven Congress members who signed a letter asking for an investigation of Freeman were heavy recipients of pro-Israel campaign donations closely affiliated with Aipac.

Even Chuck Schumer, now New York’s leading pro-Israel political leader after Hillary’s promotion to State, is getting in on the act. He picked up the phone to call his good friend and fellow pro-Israel Dem., Rahm Emanuel, to rail about Freeman. What’s especially significant about Schumer’s involvement is that until now the opposition was led by straight neo-con Republican forces and the pro-Israel right: Steve Rosen, Michael Goldfarb, the Republican Jewish Coalition, John Boehner, Eric Cantor, Mark Kirk, Marty Peretz, Jonathan Tobin, etc. Schumer is the first Democratic leader to get into the tussle.

AJC, NJDC, AIPAC, Schumer, Emanuel, ... how many more nonentities of the mythical Israel Lobby are involved here?

Read more about AIPAC at Secrecy News. Among other things you might be interested to find out more about Steve Rosen, Freeman critic and alleged spy for israel:

AIPAC Case Lingers On | Secrecy News
AIPAC Appeals Court Rules Against Prosecutors | Secrecy News
The Jewish Chronicle - Classifieds, News, Business, and Events

American Goy sums up why spying for israel isn't considered wrong:

You see, the defense team can point out to the 2008 AIPAC meeting, and show a few short films showing Obama, Clinton, McCain, Pelosi, Reid, Boehner all saying the same thing - that Israel is America's greatest friend.

Well then, since Israel is America's greatest friend, giving our greatest friend and ally, the best thing to happen to the world since sliced bread was invented, a few measly "top secret" documents stolen from the Pentagon, is not treason, nor can it be proven to cause injury to the United States.

Because Israel is our greatest friend and ally.

Because American and Israeli interests and goals are the same.

Steve Rosen's response posted 10 March 2009, Chas Freeman withdraws from NIC nomination:

Democratic Representative Steve Israel said that he spoke of his concerns last week to White House Chief of Staff Rahm Emanuel and later sent him materials about the former ambassador's statements and associations. Israel, a member of the House Appropriations Committee's Select Intelligence Oversight Panel, said in a phone interview, "As I was leaving the White House this afternoon, they told me of Blair's statement" of Freeman's withdrawal. "I think Blair's defense of Freeman was indefensible, and people in the White House realized that."

Freeman is indefensible in the sense that at this point anyone who defends him will just as surely be drummed out of government by the same mythical conspiracy.

A powerful US politician whose middle name is Israel, and another whose last name is Israel, join together with a collection of well-funded, well-organized pro-Israel organizations to snuff the appointment of a critic of Israel, while a gaggle of jews waves their hands, Jedi-style, saying "it was his conspiratorial temperament".

What can I say? This is absolutely mindnumbing. The scandal is already over-the-top and the ADL and SPLC haven't even piped up to claim that it's just another example of how the poor powerless jews get scapegoated by "old canards" of "the anti-semites".

Today, the 11th March 2009 marks the third anniversary of the murder by the United Nations of Serbian Nationalist and Socialist Hero, Slobodan Milosevic.

Slobodan Milosevic bravely campaigned for the freedom of the Serbian people from the yoke of international capitalism. He was a heroic defender of the European people against the intrigues of globalist Zionists. He was kidnapped at the behest of Organised Jewry for the 'crime' of wanting a free and strong homeland for his people - a crime for which the Zionist United Nations punishes all transgressors with unrestricted brutality, all transgressors except Israel which is allowed to live as a Nationalist entity with no criticism.

For Europeans, the murder of President Milosevic and the genocidal war against the Slavic people by the Judaised NATO forces saw a betrayal of the heroic defenders of Europe against the Muslim hordes at Kosovo Poje in 1389. That battle saw the beginning of a resurgence of European resistance against the Turkish enemy and eventually led to the overthrow of Islam in Europe. The Zionist aggressors of NATO/UN, supported, funded and organised the murderous Muslim terrorist butchers in occupied Jugoslavija, in order to destabilise the region of the Balkans, and to bolster the anti-European parasites resident there, who had previously been contained in the open sewer of Albania. The butchers of Bosnia, re-emerged as the KLA, then as Al-Qaeda. They were originally recruited by the CIA to fight the USSR in Afghanistan. These murderers may be Islamic by faith, but are 100% owned by the Jewish CIA.

Never forget the heroes of Europe who have fought to defend our homeland from alien aggression. At every stage they have been betrayed by Zionists who put wealth and power above National Pride and Social Morality. On this day we honour our brave comrade, Patriot and Socialist, Slobodan Milosevic.

Slobodan Milosevic - ¡Presente!

During this past month has Lawrence Auster has expressed a considerable shift in rhetoric, fundamentally altering his depiction of "liberalism" by adopting, without explanation, ideas he had previously ignored, dismissed, or denounced.

In First thoughts on the PWC conference, posted on 8 Feb 2009, we see Auster was giving speeches "meticulously describing" non-discrimination and writing about "suicidal white guilt that results from ignorance of race differences".

In What is good discrimination?, posted on 24 Feb 2009, Auster wrote:

We need to distinguish between necessary/proper/good discrimination and unnecessary/improper/bad discrimination. This is something that liberalism never does, because liberalism considers all discrimination to be bad; moreover, it considers every type of discrimination to be equally bad.

At Oz Conservative, around 17 Feb 2009, something had changed. Suddenly Sailer's "competition between whiter people", which Auster had previously judged useless, was transformed into war and became his own idea. Auster wrote:

The signs are gathering that the Western societies are heading into an age of civil wars. Not between white and nonwhite, not between Christian and Muslim, but between liberal whites and non-liberal whites. That's shaping up as the major divide of our time.

Next he transformed "suicidal white guilt" into "murder". In The cause of the white race will not go away, posted on 5 Mar 2009, Auster wrote:

when I consider today's systematic campaign, organized and backed by all the ruling powers of society, to put down, demonize, disempower, and marginalize the white race, I think it is shaping up as the greatest crime in the history of mankind

Today, 10 Mar 2009, Auster posts The supposedly race-blind liberal media defines a "true American", finally realizing (or finally admitting) that non-discrimination isn't at all what "liberalism" is about. He writes:

Liberalism is not about making race unimportant. Liberalism is about elevating nonwhites, particularly blacks, over whites, and about turning whites into non-persons. Liberalism is pure racism under the guise of anti-racism. What "anti-racism" really means is simply anti-whiteness.

It is extraordinary watching Auster break so much new ground so quickly. Where on earth is he getting these insane ideas?

Here are three more major related pieces he has yet to cough up:

• Note that "liberalism" does not turn jews into non-persons. Quite the contrary, both jews and "liberalism" sees jews as non-White and elevates them over everyone else, including blacks.

• Note that "liberalism" has become more anti-White at the same time and in the same proportion as jewish influence over Western sociopolitical thought has increased.

• Note that even in his own shifty estimation all of the above is "anti-semitism", move to israel to find himself and repent his sins, blog exclusively in hebrew from this point on, and never again try to command "the majority" (to which he is alien) what to say or do.

I see the MI5, sorry Real IRA are up to their usual shenanigans again. Funny isn't it that at the exact time that the State are using programmes like Eastenders to push for race riots, and the Police are being inflicted with cutbacks so they can't cope with civil disorder, then just at that moment, along comes Real MI5, oh dear IRA, and starts killing squaddies! Ordinary Soldiers, not deserving scum like 'Global Warming' Prince Charles.

How long are the British people going to keep believing that the IRA are the enemy? The 'real' enemy are the people who train the IRA puppets, arm them, and decide who should be murdered. The enemy are the bosses of MI5, who pretend to care about the security of the British nation, but in reality are the perpetrators of the most heinous crimes against our people. The foot-soldiers of the IRA are only the visible part of the terrorist machine. The most dangerous part is the organisation which controls every aspect of the war against freedom. That is Her Majesty's Military Intelligence. Next time someone asks you to stand for 'God Save The Queen' remember the deeds committed for the benefit of that despicable set of vermin.

The great irony of the conflict is that the people of Ulster are the descendants of the Scots, who in turn came from Ireland! The whole religious side to the war is a farce. Many leading Fenian's are died-in-wool Marxists, with no religion whatsoever. They use Catholicism as a means to divide the Ulster folk. Likewise, many of the Orangemen are nothing but Freemasons, who have no commitment to any hue of Christianity. The war is a massive lie.

The conflict in Ulster has allowed the British State to conduct exercises in social control and urban warfare. The Masons behind the Orange and Green Nationalists are tied to MI5 and the British monarchy. The ordinary people of the British Isles from County Kerry to Caithness, from Derry to Dover, are sick of this war, and have no hostility against their neighbours. The War is for the benefit of the British ruling establishment as a means to acclimatise us to a military presence in our streets, and the constant fear of terrorism. It is a false flag operation. The enemy isn't Catholic, or Protestant, Irish or British, it is Globalist and Zionist, and Monarchist...

Real IRA? How stupid do they think we are?

From:
"Völkische Reichsbewegung" info-hm@voelkische-reichsbewegung.org

Horst Mahler's Closing Statement

Translated from the German by J M Damon

In My Show Trial Before Munich District Court II
Case No. 2 KLs 11 Js 42142/07

Closing Statement

The great mystery of human history has finally
entered our consciousness as knowledge of Truth.

The passage of God through the world that He
created is revealed to us as the eternal struggle
within God Himself, as He participates in the
struggle against evil on behalf of what we humans
consider the Good. Through us, God thus becomes
Absolute Spirit, which, transcending morality, is
neither good nor bad.

Man cannot judge God. We can exist only as a
Volk. Without a Volk, Man cannot exist as Man.

As Herder taught us, nations exist as thoughts of
God. They have identity and significance only
insofar as they can be distinguished from one
another.

An orchestra consisting of nothing except violins
would quickly bore the audience. Every Volk is a
separate thought or concept of God and has the
obligation to preserve itself as such, through
all changes and vicissitudes.

It is the destiny of Judaism, the diffused nation
within other nations, to exist as the spirit of
negation. Without this spirit of negation God
could not know what He is not as well as what He
intends to be. Because it exists as the spirit of
negation, Zion is and ever has been hated and
shunned by all nations. (Book of Isaiah, Chap.
60, Verses 14 and 15).

In our (Christian) age, however, Zion has been
redeemed by the nations through their
acknowledgment of Judaism as "the negation of the
lives of nations" (Martin Buber.)

Zion's redemption began with Jesus' words:

"You (the leaders of Zion) belong to your father,
the devil, and you want to carry out your
father's desire.
He was a murderer from the beginning, not holding
to the truth, for there is no truth in him.
When he lies, he speaks his native language, for
he is a liar and the father of lies.
Because I tell the truth, you do not believe me!"

(John 8, 44-45)

As servants of God the Trinity, the Jews
established the Empire of Mammon as a challenge
and admonition for the nations of the Earth. The
Empire of Mammon is now reaching its end,
however. It has the lie of Jewish "gas chamber
genocide" to thank for its culmination as well as
its fall. The gas chamber or "Auschwitz Lie" was
indeed the greatest lie in the history of mankind.

Now that the world monetary swindle has
culminated and been exposed, the world is asking
itself: "How could such a swindle have occurred?"
It came about through international illusions
about the role and the true nature of Judaism, in
particular illusions about Jewish plutocrats.
These illusions have now vanished, along with the
make-believe homicidal gas chambers utilizing
Zyklon B Insecticide at Auschwitz Concentration
Camp. The Auschwitz Lie has finally run its
course and the truth has triumphed.

The mighty protector of Israel, the United States
of America, is disintegrating before our eyes,
while the "Holocaust" Cult is devouring itself in
ratlike fury by persecuting those who dare to
expose it. If there were real empirical, forensic
or documentary evidence for the unique crime that
the Jewish-owned media call "Holocaust," they
would certainly have presented it long ago, and
this would have enabled them to neutralize their
skeptics with ridicule. But there is no such
evidence, since no gas chamber genocide occurred.

It is incumbent upon companions of our Volk to
deliver the death blow to the Judaic "Holocaust"
Cult, and this can be accomplished only through
self-sacrifice. Until now we have been duped by
the Jewish Media into opposing the compulsory
"Holocaust" dogma under the banner of freedom of
opinion. From now on, however, we are no longer
restricted to struggling for human rights under
this banner. Now there is more at stake than
winning freedom to express opinions. The
continuation of our existence as a German nation
is at stake, the survival of our Volk.

Guilt kills the human spirit, as mankind has
known since the pioneering discoveries by the
Jewish scientist Sigmund Freud. Section 130
Paragraph 3 of the Criminal Code is more than a
mere "muzzle" - it is a weapon for the spiritual
destruction of our Volk, used in relentless
attacks on our existence as a nation. Section 130
is illegal under international law. We are
compelled to defend ourselves against it - and
not just for our own sake. The German Volk is the
light of the nations. We have a God-given
obligation to keep it alive and beaming.

Germans must comprehend that, in the ancient
Talmudic spirit, world Jewry is now attacking our
right to defend ourselves and preserve our Volk
with life imprisonment! Such drastic punishment
is a good measure of their desperation. It has
become necessary because Germans of sound
character can no longer desist from speaking the
truth and calling the Auschwitz Lie by its name.

Everyone who acknowledges the right and the
necessity of self-defense has a duty to oppose
the Jewish genocide against the German spirit.
The way to oppose this genocide is to speak the
truth.

In our day, the German who does not kowtow to the
Jews will be relentlessly brought before the
courts and deprived of his freedom, so that he
will spend his life behind bars. I stand
convicted of exposing Talmudic perfidiousness by
ceaselessly calling the Auschwitz Lie by its name
and confronting it with the truth. I have been
doing this for many years now, since I swore a
sacred oath to my Volk never to relent in the
struggle against the "Holocaust" Cult.

At the age of 73, I can expect to spend the rest
of my days under the dictates of the foreign
interests that dominate our Fatherland. 21 months
of imprisonment have already been pronounced. In
addition to this, the vassals of foreign
domination in Potsdam District Court demand
another 57 months while those in Munich demand 72
months. For a 73-year-old man, a sentence of
twelve and a half years is life imprisonment.

Quod erat demonstrandum! [This is what had to be demonstrated.]

I ask my fellow Germans: do you want to languish forever?
Throw off the yoke of Jacob!
We have the most powerful weapon of all, the Truth.
We must make use of it!

Horst Mahler
Munich, 25 February 2009

Around the globe the carefully planned financial crisis is wreaking havoc. As the ripples spread to engulf the international transportation of food, even in Europe, the prospects of food shortages are becoming closer to reality than anyone has dared to consider. Whilst many people have rightly pointed the finger of blame in the direction of the Banking Industry, the real culprits are those who control that industry, and indeed the global Capitalist/Corporatist system and its twin evil, State Socialism/Communitarian Communism.

Who are these hidden enemies of humanity, and from where do they operate? Gordon Brown let slip who his real masters are when he was heard to say that he didn't care what happened to the UK, so long as the City of London was protected. He went so far as to say the nation should be left to rot, with nothing to offer but being a tourist destination. Such is the calibre of the politicians of Westminster.

Why is the City of London so important? Indeed what and where is the City of London? It is important because it is the financial headquarters of the global empire, the New World Order. Geographically it is situated around Temple Bar in the heart of old London - a very small area of the sprawling conurbation which also goes by the name of London. The City of London may be situated in the heart of the capital of the UK, but it is not in fact part of the UK. The City of London is an independent sovereign nation which is in no way responsible to the country in which it is physically located. That lack of responsibility goes both ways - and the British people need to wake up to that fact.

The City is the financial capital of the Globalist Empire, with the military capital in the City State of Washington DC (which likewise is independent of the USA), and the temporal capital in the Vatican (which is located in Rome, but is not part of Italy.) These three City States make up the unholy trinity which has driven the globalist agenda, and is now within a few moves of enslaving us all.

Contrary to the lie they like to push, one of the most powerful families in this anti-human network is the 'British' monarchy. Over many years they have manipulated the political face of Britain so as to give the false appearance that they are nothing but powerless figureheads from a bygone age. This is just one of the many lies of this sick family. They have never relinquished any real power.

The Bankers are certainly a part of the global problem, but only insofar as they are tools of the hidden elite. It is the trinity of Washington DC, the Vatican and the City of London who pull the strings, and behind them it is the 13 Satanic bloodlines who call the shots.

So what is the solution to the Zionist New World Order? The first step towards freedom is accepting that we are in a state of war and acting accordingly. We need to stop supporting these monsters. We need ultimately to destroy the power of the City States. This is a massive task. We need to start somewhere. We cannot fight in the traditional manner. We need to refuse to co-operate with these tyrants. That means not accepting their economic rule, not supporting their military conquests, and not supporting their twisted heresies. The City in truth an anti-economy which serves to impoverish the masses whilst the elite gain everything, likewise the military elite defend no-one except the anti-human butchers, and the religious leaders lead the people away from salvation into absolute damnation and service of evil.

This is a massive battle, which this article can only touch upon. We need to educate everyone we can as to the true nature of our oppressors before we can tackle them. Exposing the Unholy Trinity and the paedophile rapists who occupy the Throne, is a place to start.

I'd like to shine a light on Andrew Breitbart's Big Hollywood.

Hollywood’s Second Class Jewish Chicks & “Two Lovers”

Hollywood’s Second Class Jewish Chicks & “Two Lovers”
by Debbie Schlussel

Why is it that on the silver screen, the Jewish chick is always the undesirable one, the safe choice, the ugly/annoying one? Even women who are Jewish (or half) in real life play the “desirable gentile goddess” while the Jewish woman character is the second fiddle. It might have something to do with the self-hatred of many male Jews in Hollywood for whom the Jewish woman is exactly that stereotype; besides, many of them need to justify marrying outside of the faith. Or maybe it’s just the self-hatred.

I ask this because in “Two Lovers,” which hit nationwide release this week, Joaquin Phoenix plays a Jewish guy whose parents want him to date (and marry) the beautiful Jewish daughter (Vinessa Shaw), of the couple who are buying their business. But, instead, he prefers the hot blonde gentile woman (played by the half-Jewish Gwyneth Paltrow) who doesn’t want him. The Jewish woman as the safe, not-as-sexy-or-hot choice is nothing new in Hollywood. We’ve seen it in sooo many TV shows and flicks, like the 1972 incarnation of “The Heartbreak Kid” in which Elliott Gould Charles Grodin dumps the homely Jewish stereotype-ette for the hot (at that time) Cybill Shepherd.

Read my review of “Two Lovers” and note that this stereotype can also work if you reverse the roles of each sex. For example, in the far superior and much warmer “Crossing Delancey” (1988), Amy Irving (who was not Jewish, but reportedly converted to marry Steven Spielberg) plays a Jewish woman who was in love with the male version of the Gwyneth Paltrow character, an author who didn’t really love her back. At the urging of her grandmother, she dates (and falls in love with) the more nebbishe/geeky Peter Riegert.

“Delancey” was 21 years ago and I thought we’d advanced. But apparently, the same Jewish liberals who are embarrassed about the first of those two adjectives are still running the show. They just don’t like themselves any more. Plus, they’re still trying to get away from their mothers, apparently.

There are plenty of beautiful Jewish women (some even blonde) in Hollywood, including my cousin, actress Amelia Kingston (real name: Shannon Schlussel). Sad that Hollywood still wants you to think they’re the ugly, annoying caricatures in the Protocols of the Elders of Zion.

More sad that the ones doing the caricaturing are neither Muslims nor Nazis, but my own fellow co-religionists.

Note: This post has been updated. Both Vinessa Shaw and Joaquin Phoenix were incorrectly identified as not being Jewish. We regret the error and thank the readers who pointed this out.

Schlussel is an ugly/annoying jewish chick who cares deeply for the welfare of jews, so deeply that she dares to blame Hollywood jews for the promulgation of destructive values and negative stereotypes. Sad that she still wants you to think muslims, Nazis, and the Protocols of the Elders of Zion have anything to do with what she's complaining about. Her concern for purity and continuity is common amongst jews, as is the pretense that the basis for this concern is religious rather than genetic.

Of course when a White who cares deeply for the welfare of Whites dares to blame jews anywhere for anything we're accused of being delerious with jew-hate. It's almost as bad if we express even the slightest concern about marriage outside of "the faith", or object to Hollywood jews casting annoying "half-faith" or outright alien chicks as our desirable goddess ideal.

The comments from Schlussel's readers are mildly interesting. As usual we non-jews are to blame. America is suffused with a "nordic" female standard of beauty and we are simply not jewish enough to understand the romantic sub-genre in which jewish producers, directors, and actors change their surnames to better lust after hot button-nosed Aryan babes. What's worse, in spite of unwritten rules to the contrary, "they" keep recycling the same handful of White Anglo-Saxons to play jews!

As eager as Schlussel is to discriminate jews from non-jews she makes mistakes and underestimates jewish influence. Perhaps only someone delerious with hate could say that it might be because:

Hollywood is chock full of Jewish celebrities, although some fly under the radar more than others. For every proud and outspoken Jewish star like Adam Sandler or Jon Stewart, there's someone that you might not realize is Jewish, like Rachel Bilson or Harrison Ford.

Or Vinessa Shaw. Or Joaquin Phoenix. Schlussel should check with the Jewish United Fund before she complains about the black muslim actor that self-hating jews miscast as a jewish action hero in Tropic Thunder.

James Edwards takes issue with Rush Limbaugh's early praise for Breitbart and Big Hollywood:

No, it’s how conservatives are going to spin their wheels and do absolutely nothing about the problem. Breitbart’s site isn’t “crucial” to changing the Hollywood culture. It’s the exact opposite. Worse than being irrelevant, it’s going to enable the people who run Hollywood and the news media to keep doing what they’ve been doing for decades - destroying our culture.

Note to Limbaugh: “Liberals” don’t run Hollywood. Jews run Hollywood, and Jews are to culture what Muslims are to tall buildings. Jews promote conservatism and traditional moral values the same way Muslims promote wearing bikinis. Of course, Limbaugh knows this. So does Breitbart, and everyone writing for his site. So does just about every right wing or conservative commentator and writer. They all know it, which is why they never, ever discuss it. Does anyone doubt for a minute that if were Muslims putting out all this filth Limbaugh and Breitbart and everyone else would pretend not to notice?

Well, to be fair, at least Schlussel notices that Hollywood jews are motivated by hate and are harming someone. However, the larger BH deception remains - there is no About page that explains their cause, but plainly they are concerned more about what's good for jews than Hollywood or whoever else Hollywood might be harming. That would certainly seem to be the point of Confessions of a Recovering Anti-Semite (my emphasis):

But despite my aversion to them, and the harsh judgments I kept strictly to myself, I was jealous of Jews. I had been for a long time. Like Italians, Jews had all the attributes WASPs seemed to lack - namely passion, determination, and a fierce self-respect. They knew when to get mad, and they had no problem raising their voices - even yelling - when necessary.

They didn’t care what other people thought. Good behavior wasn’t the point. Anger and indignation were healthy emotions to express, to act on - the motivators for justice. And nobody recognizes injustice better than a Jew.

By comparison, the WASPs I knew were obliging doormats with no convictions about anything except pleasing the right people. Reformed people pleasers know what a dead end that is; ultimately, you please no one, least of all yourself. People who have been beaten understand this. That’s why they fight.

I spent most of my life in a people-pleasing coma. But since the attacks of 9/11, unWASPy waves of outrage wash over me more and more everyday. I have found my inner Jew. Meanwhile, the self-hatred that fueled my former mousy modesty seems to have caught on - and spread across an entire nation like some enervating cultural contagion.

Today, like it or not, we are all Jews. If you live in Israel, Great Britain or America, you are a Jew. If you are black, white, Latino, Asian, gay, straight, bi, questioning, Buddhist, Hindu, atheist, married, single, divorced, male, female, rich, poor, young, old, if you love cats, dogs, monkeys, pigs, Britney Spears, Amy Winehouse or opera - you are a Jew.

Because without our even realizing it, right beneath our very feet, the playing field has been leveled. At long last, we really are all equal. (Hear that, Human Rights Campaign?) We’re as equal as expendable, interchangeable, nothing-special, mass targets can be.

The horrors of Auschwitz, Dachau and Bergen-Belsen didn’t die with Hitler; they’ve gone global in a new kind of war that’s largely subliminal, psychological. And we’re nodding off fast when we should be popping No-Doz.

Islamic supremacists, who daily beat the drum for their imperialistic vision of a Jew-free, Great Satan-free world, have passion to spare. They are fired up, and united by the ferocious clarity of their convictions - just the way it once seemed to me the Jews were.

The BH distain for WASPs appears just as poisonous as Hollywood's. Though it is more clumsily disguised by BH than "anti-liberal" jew Lawrence Auster, the common ulterior purpose is to recruit Whites to serve jewish interests.

I am not a jew. I see duplicity and disrespect directed toward myself and my people from a broad range of jews. Under no circumstances will I serve them.