|
|---|
Sunday, 27 December 2009
On 16 December 2009 Garrison Keillor wrote a brief editorial titled Nonbelievers, please leave Christmas alone, the thrust of which was "Christmas is a Christian holiday - if you're not in the club, then buzz off". What really caused a stir was:Unitarians listen to the Inner Voice and so they have no creed that they all stand up and recite in unison, and that's their perfect right, but it is wrong, wrong, wrong to rewrite "Silent Night." If you don't believe Jesus was God, OK, go write your own damn "Silent Night" and leave ours alone. This is spiritual piracy and cultural elitism, and we Christians have stood for it long enough. And all those lousy holiday songs by Jewish guys that trash up the malls every year, Rudolph and the chestnuts and the rest of that dreck. Did one of our guys write "Grab your loafers, come along if you wanna, and we'll blow that shofar for Rosh Hashanah"? No, we didn't.
Oh my. "Dreck", for those who don't know, is yiddish slang for shit.
The reaction from self-identified jews was unhinged. It follows a template including some or all of the following elements: denying Keillor's claim, condemning him for it, acknowledging its truth, and saying nastier things about Christians. I'll cite a few good examples. Here for instance is a response attached to the original editorial:I am astounded Mr. Keillor that It has taken you most of your life to realize the depravity of the non-believers. Where I live in Silicon Valley, every ethnicity can be found on my block. Probably half are not Christian, yet most have Christmas trees. Lets send these non-believers to Auschwitz where they and the Jews can learn the true meaning of Christ. The Jews. Oh the Jews . They have contaminated Christmas by writing music and making movies about it. They have ruined it by inventing running a toy train under the Christmas tree and hosting a parade in New York. They have dared to stand up to the WASP tradition of segregation and hate.They actually claim that Jesus was one of them. Mr. Keillor enjoy your Christmas, Jew-less with Mel Gibson. You may be the last true Christians.
This self-righteous fellow equates criticizing shitty Christmas songs written by jews to putting them in a concentration camp. He gets so lost in his sarcasm that he reveals an acceptance of a broadened version of Keillor's beef - that "the jews" righteously ruined Christmas, their hostility justified by "the WASP tradition of segregation and hate".
More reader comments were published as separate items. For example, Keillor has wrong villain for Chrismas' ills:Yesterday, perhaps at roughly the same moment you were putting the finishing touches on "Non-believers, please leave Christmas alone" (Dec. 16), I was swallowing back bile while watching the Christmas songs for which you and I share equal antipathy being etched into the psyche my 2-year-old Jewish daughter. The frustration and sorrow that you feel about the trite-making of Christmas is, to borrow a phrase from your (likewise appropriated) Yiddish-Minnesota phrasebook, bubkes compared with a Jew's sufferance of the Santa Claus tube-feeding to which we are subjected each year. You see, we have a little history that colors our feelings. I'll leave it there.
I think it's fair to summarize the sentiment here as: "No lowly Christian is fit to compare their sufferance to that of a jew. Yes, we wrote (and profit from) these shitty songs, but even mere disapproval of this infuriates us. Blame economics. Purely. Repent sinner, or feel our retribution."
That you included even the mere mention of Jews in your diatribe, you might imagine upon further reflection, is beyond infuriating. As an outsider to your traditions and holidays, I frankly agree with many of your conclusions, but you missed the point: the hijacking of Christmas is purely the result of capitalism and the free market economy. The fact that a bunch of Jews wrote your Christmas songs is solely a function thereof. I needn't lecture you on the confluence of commerce and artisanship, but suffice it to say, it is a two-way street. In other words, y'all bought the songs that we sold. You buy it, you break it.
The long reach of your words is based upon the popularity you enjoy among the intellectual elite. Just take another look at the numbers at the listenership of the public radio stations that carry your program, then re-read the opinion piece in question. If self-sabotage is your aim, my compliments. If not, you may consider apologies to: Jews, pinch-faced drones (those who strive to understand and forward the human condition), Harvard alumni and the sorry suckers who work too hard to make Christmas perfect. Admittedly a mixed bag -- your targets are either too elite for you or not elite enough.
Another response is notable for its superbly compact hypocrisy and falsehood. Jews aren't the ones who secularized Christmas: We can barely get our children excused from school on the Jewish High Holidays, and Mr. Keillor whines about Jews who wrote songs inspired by Christmas.
The author inverts reality, claiming her imagined concerns are concrete and Keillor's concrete concerns are imagined.
Lots of people have noted how and why jews have helped secularize Christmas. I'll provide some examples of that in a moment. What I'd like to see is some evidence of jews anywhere in the US not being excused from school on their high holidays. In the midst of the greatest ripoff in history, which absolutely, positively had to be dealt with immediately, or else, congress somehow found the time to observe a jewish high holiday. Beyond that, the full force and weight of the US government stands ready to defend jews and their jewish children against any discrimination, whether by race or religion. The media isn't at all shy about reporting anti-jewish "hate" within minutes of the mere hint of it being detected. Call it whining, but Christians, despite the supposed protection offered to religion, are treated to a different, lower standard than jews, and not only in schools. The assault goes on 24/7/365. Here's a small sample I've gathered over the past few months.
Even if it were restricted to the words and deeds of Larry David, Bill Maher, Tim Wise, or Bonnie Erbe alone this list could be much longer. Garrison Keillor is a weak and lonely voice in a media brimming with jews whose fame and fortune aren't at all threatened by their nasty attacks on Christians. For his crime Keillor will likely apologize and/or lose his soapbox. No such punishment awaits David, Maher, Wise, Erbe, or the hundreds of others guilty of saying far more hostile things than, say, shitty Christian music has ruined jewish holidays.
The point is that Keillor has a point. If anything, his complaint was too narrow. Similar defenses of Christianity - made by prominent voices in mainstream media - are increasingly timid and rare. The problem with Keillor's complaint is not that it is inaccurate or attacks "the jews" - it's that he implied one aspect of a tiny subset of jewish influence is bad. For that, under our thoroughly judaized regime, any man will be villified. This is especially true for anyone with a prominent voice.
In Garrison Keillor: 'Lousy Holiday Songs By Jews Trash Up Malls', Noel Sheppard describes the Keillor paragraph I quoted at the top as "rabid anti-Semitism", provided a long list of well-known Christmas songs written by jews, and then called Keillor an "anti-Semitic (expletive deleted)". There is no dispute about the contribution of jews. Keillor's use of the words "trash" and "dreck" to describe that contribution is what triggers the typically hyperbolic reaction.
Andy Lewis, writing in the LA Times, titled his article published on 24 December 2009, Bob Dylan joins long list of Jewish musicians performing Christmas music. Apparently unaware that the idea is controversial he also provided a window into the jewish rationale for secularizing Christmas:Diamond closed the album with a raucous performance of comedian Adam Sandler's "The Chanukah Song," which name-checks Jewish entertainers, including Kirk Douglas, Dinah Shore and "Star Trek's" William Shatner and Leonard Nimoy.
In An All-American Christmas, published on 22 December 2005, Harold Meyerson claims:
"I thought I'd throw one in there for my people too, because we always feel a little left out around this time of year," Diamond told the Telegraph in London recently. "Christmas music is amazingly evocative to people of all religions and cultures."
Others also cite the universal aspects of the holiday season -- and the role of music in it -- as their justification for taking on the subject of Christmas.
"I feel the Christmas holidays and the music are basically, for me, not religious," Neil Sedaka, one of the most prolific and successful songwriters of the '60s and '70s, said from his home in L.A. recently. "I'm proud to be Jewish, but I don't practice it. To me the holidays are about bringing friends and family together. I can remember vividly years ago listening to Bing Crosby's 'White Christmas' and thinking that Christmas music should be played throughout the year because it's so joyous."
Sedaka's 2008 double album, "Miracle of Christmas," brought together one disc of original songs he'd written, with a second disc of traditional songs and carols that he'd put together for the QVC cable channel.
"I started out as a concert pianist at the Juilliard School," Sedaka said, "and I'm a very studied musician. I think of the music first, and what it brings to the people emotionally."
Barry Manilow too says that the power of music, more than the scriptural messages, has spurred him to record three collections of Christmas music over the years.Irving Berlin invented the separation of church and song with “White Christmas.”
"White Christmas" was one of a dozen numbers that Berlin wrote for "Holiday Inn," each song commemorating a specific holiday. One hesitates to impute anything so vulgar as a message to a Crosby-Fred Astaire musical, but the message of this musical is that we are all Americans and these are our holidays. Easter belongs to all of us, even if it is about little more than strolling down Fifth Avenue. Christmas belongs to all of us. The religious content of those holidays was fine for Christian believers, but the composer of "God Bless America" preferred to celebrate a common national identity, complete with common holidays that had nonsectarian meanings.
Like Bonnie Erbe, Harold Meyerson has a powerful media amplifier he uses to vent his hostility towards Christians, especially White Christians. Here he lauds the recent imposition of a secularized Christmas while heaping fear and loathing on the original, secular Christmas. In Economy? What Economy?, published on 3 Sept 2008, Meyerson echoes Erbe:
Berlin kept Christmas in the public square and, more than anyone before or since, sent it out over the public airwaves. But it was an American, not a Christian, Christmas. And by the crass index of number of recordings sold, and the not-so-crass index of number of spirits touched, Berlin's nonsectarian holiday has been the predominant version of Christmas in this country for the past 60 years.
Now the Fox News demagogues want to impose a more sectarian Christmas on us, supplanting the distinctly American holiday we have celebrated lo these threescore years with a holiday that divides us along religious lines. Bill O'Reilly can blaspheme all he wants, but like millions of my countrymen, I take attacks on Irving Berlin's America personally. If O'Reilly doesn't like it here, why doesn't he go back to where he came from?this year's GOP convention is almost shockingly -- un-Americanly -- white. Long term, this whiteness is a huge problem
Jews are constantly complaining about the problems they have with Christains and Whites in terms far more broad, far more hateful, and far more common than what Garrison Keillor wrote. As Edmund Connelly's essay Daniel Jonah Goldhagen: Peddler of Hate makes clear, the problems extend far beyond shitty Christmas songs.
(The image above is from a pro-jewish rant at Garrison Keillor: 'Lousy Holiday Songs By Jews Trash Up Malls' at Thee Rant.)
Thursday, 24 December 2009
By way of preface I'll admit that like other deracinated, mainstream White Americans, most everything I have ever read or heard about Lyndon LaRouche has come from people, mainly via TV or in print news, who don't like him and take for granted that everyone should think LaRouche and the people who agree with him are insane clowns, fools, morons, losers, etc. I don't remember any specific reasons being offered to justify this attitude, but not wanting to waste time understanding something marginal and not wanting to be considered insane was enough reason for me, until recently, to simply ignore him.
Relatively late in life however I've come to understand that, at least some of the time, certain people get heaped with opprobrium not because what they're saying is wrong or insane, but because they pose a threat to people who have power. Incorrect, insane things can be said, even things that pose a threat, as long as they're said about powerless people.
I only recently stumbled on this book about LaRouche. Once again the view is hostile, in fact extremely hostile, but unlike the vague smears I've encountered in the past this author explicitly details just what it is about LaRouche that he sees as a threat.
Lyndon LaRouche and the New American Fascism, by William Dennis King, published in 1989. The excerpts below are taken from the Revised online HTML edition, 2007. OCR errors have been left intact. Emphasis added.
The archive.org introduction notes:Taken off Kings website, this is the most substantial mainstream book on the LaRouche movement. Has a definite anti-Larouche bias
From the beginning King makes it clear that he considers LaRouche not a "kook" to be dismissed but a serious threat, and refers frankly to the mechanisms by which such threats are usually contained.Why did society's containment system miss this "problem-case"? How did LaRouche break out of quarantine? Did powerful people know all along who and what he was, deciding simply to use him for their own purposes? Why did he remain invulnerable to prosecution for so many years? How did he inspire so much fear in those who should have led an early fight to drive him back into quarantine?
LaRouche apparently opposes "the oligarchy", but that's not who he really threatens.The lynchpin of LaRouchism, as of more primitive systems of paranoia, is the fear and hatred of an evil and secretive force. Although LaRouche calls this force the oligarchy, he really means the Jews. Given the total paranoia of the system, the fear and hatred veers into neo-Nazism.
The latter is not an acceptable ideology in today's America and so must remain partially disguised to evade the "donkey censor." LaRouche's conspiracy theory therefore becomes a double system: First, it extends the NCLC's paranoia and hatred into every aspect of thought; second, it attacks the supposed forces of evil in a euphemistic manner. This dual nature of the theory should be kept in mind as we step by step "decode" the bizarre formulations in which it is couched.
If LaRouche had been a traditional anti-Semite, he might have based his conspiracy theory on the Protocols of the Elders ofZion, the infamous forgery that purports to document a nineteenth-century conspiracy to establish a Jewish world government through various diabolical intrigues. But the Protocols is too narrow in scope for the purposes of total paranoia and also is too thoroughly discredited by scholars for practical use among most educated people. LaRouche hesitated, however, to reject out of hand one of the most effective Big Lies of the first half of the twentieth century. So he compromised: The Protocols, he said, has a "hard kernel of truth" but is only of limited significance-it represents only a small piece of the real conspiracy of the "oligarchy."
LaRouche's oligarchy makes the Elders of Zion seem mild. It supposedly has dominated the world for tens of thousands of years with unremittingly evil motives. Indeed, LaRouche accuses it of periodically killing off a large portion of the human race through famines and plagues. Today it is supposedly plotting a New Dark Ages, which will include nuclear holocaust, the massive spread of AIDS, Zero Growth, and total bestial heteronomy."The Secrets Known Only to the Inner Elites" is LaRouche's most thorough account of his version of world history. Apart from his schema of oligarchs versus humanists, this work and other NCLC pseudo-historical treatises appear to borrow heavily from the anti-Semitic "classics": Houston Stewart Chamberlain's Foundations of the Nineteenth Century {^ 899), Oswald Spengler's Decline of the l/Vesf (1918-22), Hitler's Mein Kampf {^ 925-26), Alfred Rosenberg's Myth of the Twentieth Century {^930), and Francis Parker Yockey's Imperium (1948), as well as assorted British and American Nazi tracts from the interwar years.
King sure knows exactly what he means.
LaRouche's attacks on the evil "Babylonians," for instance, strongly resemble theories found in Chamberlain, who claimed that the Jews of the Babylonian Captivity rose to great influence over their captors, and that Babylon rather than Jerusalem was the real headquarters of the ancient Jews. Chamberlain even remarked on the "Rothschilds" of Babylon. This theory is popularized for American white supremacists in pamphlets sold by the Louisiana-based Sons of Liberty~for instance. The l\/lerchants of Babylon by Rev. Bertrand L. Comparet, which features a photograph of four bearded rabbis on the cover. When LaRouche denounces the "Whore of Babylon," the Ku Klux Klan knows exactly what he means.It can be said that LaRouche's version of history not only begins with Nazi and proto-Nazi ideas (the Atlanteans from the North) but ends with them. His theory of the contemporary struggle between parasitic bankers and productive factory owners is suspiciously similar to the views of Hitler's early economics adviser, Gottfried Feder. The latter likewise urged the crushing and expropriation of speculative capital on behalf of industrial capital. Oswald Spengler, in a somewhat different version, hailed the "mighty contest between the two handfuls of steel-hard men of race and of immense intellect-which the simple citizen neither observes nor comprehends." Like LaRouche, SpengJer claimed that the "battle of mere interests" between capitalists and workers is insignificant in comparison.
Who's calling who paranoid here?
With all the above, it is still a long step to the conclusion that LaRouche's historical writings are genuine neo-Nazism. He does discuss the "British" as the racial enemy of humanity that must be crushed, destroyed, eliminated. But is he clearly referring to the Jews when he uses the word "British"?When LaRouche says the Queen of England pushes drugs or that Britain is the chief enemy of the United States, he is not merely indulging in eccentricity or a Freudian dislike of female authority figures. These statements have a serious meaning to anti-Semites and neo-Nazis in West Germany and the United States. They are eccentric only to those who have not studied the history of modern anti- Semitism, in which the theme of Jewish-British race mixing and Jewish domination of the British Empire looms large.
King concludes:
The original Nazis popularized this theory. In Mein Kampf, Hitler complained that the Jews in England exert an "almost unlimited dictatorship" through their manipulation of public opinion. Heinrich Himmler speculated in his unpublished notebooks on the "Jewish blood" of the English and Scots. Alfred Rosenberg's Myth of the Twentieth Cen^L/ry discussed the alleged identity of the policies of "Jewish high finance" with those of Great Britain and claimed that the British government had "handed over control of all financial transactions to Jewish bankers such as Rothschild, Montague, Cassell, Lazard, etc." Expressing a theory that the LaRouchians later would repeat in Dope, Inc., Rosenberg said that England had "allowed the opium trade to fall increasingly into Jewish hands."
Once Nazi Germany and Britain were at war, the Nazis developed a more exaggerated version. World-Battle, an official propaganda organ, depicted "English high finance" as Judaism incarnate. England's aggression against innocent Germany, it said, was the result of the Jews buying Churchill with piles of gold. Meanwhile Hitler's propaganda chief, Joseph Goebbels, came to regard the Jews and the British upper classes as virtually one racial entity. He wrote in his diary in 1 942: "Rothschild. ..took the floor [of the British House of Commons] and delivered a tearjerker bemoaning the fate of the Polish Jews....AII members of Parliament rose from their seats as a silent tribute to Jewry. That was quite appropriate for the British House of Commons, which is really a sort of Jewish exchange. The English, anyway, are the Jews among the Aryans. The perfumed British Foreign Minister, Eden, cuts a good figure among these characters from the synagogue. His whole education and his entire bearing can be characterized as thoroughly Jewish."Those who would project a political role onto law enforcement, hoping it will do what political leaders are unable or unwilling to do, only prove that the moral flabbiness on which demagogues thrive is still with us. Given this fact, the lessons of LaRouche's rise and apparent fall are important. If we study them seriously and act on them, it may turn out that the LaRouche phenomenon was a blessing in disguise — a dry run, under relatively safe conditions, that revealed our hitherto unsuspected weaknesses without our having to pay a heavy price for this knowledge. One thing seems certain: America is too violent and diverse — and too vulnerable to economic crisis — to avoid forever a major internal challenge from some form of totalitarian demagoguery. When that test comes, the story of Lyndon LaRouche may provide the key to an effective and timely response.
King's bio, from his blog:William Dennis King was born (1941) in Durham, N.C. and raised in Chapel Hill, N.C. He graduated from the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill in 1965. He has lived in New York City for over 40 years.
I'm reminded by this subject matter of Henry Ford's THE INTERNATIONAL JEW - THE WORLD'S FOREMOST PROBLEM, published in the 1920s, one of history's more prominent threats to "the oligarchs" and "parasitic bankers", which as per King, everybody ought to know really means "the jews".
King is the author of two books, Lyndon LaRouche and the New American Fascism (Doubleday, 1989) and Get the Facts on Anyone (Third Edition, Macmillan Reference USA, 1999) (the latter book is widely used as a manual by investigative journalists). He has written scores of articles for local and national newspapers and magazines, the majority relating to the LaRouche network and other political cults and anti-Semitic groups.
I would like to wish everyone a Happy Christmas, in the true sense of the festivity. Christmas has become a shopping carnival, with no mention of any spiritual significance apart from the oecumenical nonsense pushed by the internationalists (aka Satanists).We are in a struggle which appears to be Spiritual against Material, but is in fact the forces of Good against those of Evil. It is true that many Godless materialists fight alongside the Sabattean/Satanic elite, but that is through ignorance and brain-washing. We must help to awaken them and remove the support they give to the daemonic forces of international Zionism. For most, we must appeal to their basic selfish interests, but for others we may be able to reach them by showing them that there is more to reality than survival - there is real beauty (as opposed to the ugliness of Hollywood which we are supposed to find appealing), and real beauty is divine in creation or inspiration.
I have been contacted by a gentleman who is working on a music project called Music From The Vatican (visit:http://www.musicfromthevatican.com/) The album is entitled Alma Mater and is recorded in the honour of the Virgin Mary. To find out more about this project please view this Youtube channel:http://www.youtube.com/musicfromthevatican
Monday, 21 December 2009
The term 'Big Brother' is one which is often used as a label for some abstract and ephemeral phenomenon. It could be that our familiarity with the term has made us complacent. In England it is practically impossible to travel any distance without being tracked by an ever growing sea of surveillance. We are so used to being monitored that we hardly even notice the CCTV which is in place at every traffic junction, and in most urban streets. Add to this the alarming increase in the number of private cameras which are appearing all over the country, and one can understand that privacy in England is now nothing more than a memory. The Police even have video vans which patrol to ensure no area goes unmonitored.Sunday, 13 December 2009
In a previous article I discussed the irrational attacks upon those who strive to do what is best for their nations, and the almost religious devotion afforded to people who, in a sane society, would be classed amongst the deviant elements , and accordingly dealt with. In particular, I wrote about the pervert, Simon Sheppard. I have received requests that I provide evidence to support my assertion that the man is not the type who should be honoured for his service to the cause of freedom. I shall endeavour to do so here, using his own words to highlight exactly what kind of man is being held up as a hero of the Nationalist community.The following quotes come from Sheppard's book, The Tyranny of Ambiguity, the italics are my comments.
Thursday, 10 December 2009
‘White Male Privilege: A Social Construct for Political Oppression.’ by Hugh Murray, 1999, discusses how:Liberals seek to camouflage the overrepresentation of Jews by pointing the finger at alleged “white male privilege.”
Via Invisible Victims: White Males and Affirmative Action.
- - -
Another piece from fellist's excellent Songlight for Dawn, ‘Why Work?’ by Dorothy L. Sayers, circa 1940:Do you realize how we have had to alter our whole scale of values, now that we are no longer being urged to consume but to conserve?
- - -
Elizabeth Warren: America Without a Middle Class:Can you imagine an America without a strong middle class? If you can, would it still be America as we know it?
- - -
Tiger Woods alienates black community with white lovers. A window into blackness."Had Barack had a white wife, I would have thought twice about voting for him," Johnson Cooper said.
Contrast with the media's regard for Whites holding comparable views on race-mixing. Via Occidental Dissent.
- - -
El Centro holds position for highest jobless rateEl Centro, Calif., held its position of having the highest unemployment rate among the nation's metropolitan areas, with the jobless rate at 30%, according to government figures released Wednesday.
Look at the ethnic makeup of the Schools in El Centro, CA. Don't avert your eyes. This is where "diversity" leads. As Felipe Calderon put it: Where there are mexicans there is mexico.
While the figure fell from a revised 32.2% in September, it climbed from 26.8% a year ago and it is staggering even against the nation's 10.2% unemployment rate, which is at a 26-year high.
But the jobless picture has always been inferior in southern California's Imperial Valley.
- - -
The "cool jew" trend causes jews to complain about jews complaining about jews complaining about jews. Seriously.
Wednesday, 9 December 2009
Robert Jay Mathews was killed by US government agents 25 years ago yesterday. Here's why:The stronger my love for my people grew, the deeper became my hatred for those who would destroy my race, my heritage, and darken the future of my children.
In A Call to Arms - Part 1, recorded in 1991, William Pierce recounts his memories of Mathews in the introduction to a talk given by Mathews in 1981. Links to parts 1-13 are here at the bottom of the page.
By the time my son had arrived, I realized that White America, indeed my entire race, was headed for oblivion unless White men rose and turned the tide. The more I came to love my son the more I realized that unless things changed radically, by the time he was my age, he would be a stranger in his own land, a blonde-haired, blue-eyed Aryan in a country populated mainly by Mexicans, mulattoes, blacks and Asians. His future was growing darker by the day.
I came to learn that this was not by accident, that there is a small, cohesive alien group within this nation working day and night to make this happen. I learned that these culture distorters have an iron grip on both major political parties, on Congress, on the media, on the publishing houses, and on most of the major Christian denominations in this nation, even though these aliens subscribe to a religion which is diametrically opposed to Christianity.
These are the same people who Ex-Senator William J. Fulbright and the late General Brown tried to warn us about. Henry Ford and Charles Lindberg tried vainly to warn us also. Had we been more vigilant, my son's future would not be so dark and dismal.
Thus I have no choice. I must stand up like a White man and do battle. A secret war has been developing for the last year between the regime in Washington and an ever growing number of White people who are determined to regain what our forefathers discovered, explored, conquered, settled, built and died for.
The FBI has been able to keep this war secret only because up until now we have been doing nothing more than growing and preparing. The government, however, seems determined to force the issue, so we have no choice left but to stand and fight back. Hail Victory!
Friday, 4 December 2009
Born in 989 as the Anglo-Saxon Kingdom, England enjoyed absolute freedom as a fair and decent land, ruled with the compassion and wisdom inherent in our people. Although England was invaded in 1066 by anti-European elements and beaten down by years of Talmudic overlordship, she held on to her identity.In 2004 referenda were held to dismantle England and create a series of artificial governing regions. These were whole-heartedly rejected by the English people who voted overwhelmingly in defiance of the internationalist establishment to preserve England as one nation.
She suffered greatly, but held her head up high. It took the entire force of Talmudism to bring her to her knees. Sadly, the power of the traitors in the Establishment was not adequately fought, and she was killed whilst sleeping.
http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/news/danielhannan/100018459/at-midnight-last-night-the-united-kingdom-ceased-to-be-a-sovereign-state/
http://www.express.co.uk/posts/view/143557/Lisbon-Treaty-EU-takes-charge-of-Britain
Thursday, 3 December 2009
Eddy Morrison is a personal friend of mine. As all people do we have have arguments, however, he has never given me any reason to believe that he is anything but a committed patriot who sincerely loves his country and wishes to see her freed from the stranglehold her enemies have on her."Come outside, Eddy, and I'll do you."
In contrast to the vile treatment meted out to the likes of Eddy Morrison we have the undeserving hero-worship afforded to people such as Simon Sheppard and Stephen Whittle.
Simon Sheppard and Stephen Whittle were convicted of racial hatred for the publication of material which denies the use of gas chambers to kill Jews in the Second World War. A little background to this case shows the lunacy of the 'Heretical Two'. Sheppard and Whittle had written a range of articles which could not have been more provocative had they been designed to break the laws in existence in politically correct Britain. Amongst the articles, were discussions of the racial character of Africans - featuring images of monkeys. Not even Covert tactics was that extreme. The website, http://www.heretical.com/, was a gift to those who see themselves as custodians of acceptable thought.
Convicted in England for the offence of publishing racially inflammatory material via the internet, Sheppard and Whittle fled to Los Angeles to claim political asylum. Acting in a manner which should raise questions as to their sanity, the two men accused of 'anti-Semitic' offences fled Britain to seek asylum in the USA. If anything, the USA is even more in the grip of internationalism than is Great Britain. Claiming asylum in the USA showed a complete lack of intelligence. Had the pair sought refuge in Iran, they may have fared better. Their strategy was akin to Jerry the cartoon mouse seeking refuge from Tom in a cattery!
The Heretical website has been operating for several years. So why should the two Englishmen suddenly come under scrutiny by the Law? Bizarrely, somebody put a copy of a the illustrated magazine ‘Tales of the Holohoax’ through the door of Blackpool Reform Synagogue. Unsurprisingly, the magazine was handed to the Police who, with uncharacteristic efficiency, managed to identify the PO Box address as that of Simon Sheppard. They then raided his address in a manner which would have been more appropriate to a raid on a suspected serial killer than a publisher of a comic, and found on his computer articles entitled “Dumb Niggers, Gloating Jews” and “Make Niggers History”. For writing and publishing these juvenile articles, the Heretical Two became heroes in the eyes of those who get pleasure from infantile and inflammatory cartoons. Morrison, on the other hand, for focusing on the Zionist leadership, and not poking fun at ordinary Jews who are as much victims of Globalism as everyone else, has received threats at his own home. Something is very wrong in Nationalism in England.
To return to the heroes of the football-watching, yobbos who are courted by those who see mass membership of parties as a key goal for saving the nation, during their court case, the Crown Prosecution Service lawyer, Mari Reid (of the Counter Terrorism Division) stated that:
"(Tales of the Holohoax) went much further than simply denying the Holocaust, which is not in itself an offence in this country. The whole subject was treated in a way that was insulting and abusive and as a subject for humour...Another example was a leaflet called ‘Ohdruff, Auschwitz Holiday Resort’, where the general theme was that Auschwitz was in fact a holiday camp provided by the Nazi regime and to which Jews from all over Europe came to enjoy a free holiday...People are entitled to hold racist and extreme opinions which others may find unpleasant and obnoxious. What they are not entitled to do is to publish or distribute those opinions to the public in a threatening, abusive or insulting manner, either intending to stir up racial hatred or in circumstances where it is likely racial hatred will be stirred up."
Bassetlaw MP John Mann, chairman of the All-Party Parliamentary Group against Anti-Semitism (ie the Witch finder general of the Zionist Committee for the Suppression of Free Speech), remarked:
“The conviction of Simon Sheppard and Stephen Whittle is proof that if you write, disseminate and publish anti-Semitic racist propaganda in the UK, or on the internet from here in the UK, the police will come after you and the courts will convict. This case sets an excellent precedent — anti-Semitic hate is not welcome here in the UK."
To translate that into English, what was achieved by the Heretical Two was to give to the Zionist establishment a golden opportunity to further clamp down on freedom of speech. Skipping bail and fleeing to the USA was sheer idiocy, and an action which will hamper justice for all in future, as the State will now be able to cite a concrete example of alleged nationalists trying to evade justice.
I have never met Stephen Whittle so I feel unable to comment on the man, other than to say he showed extreme bad judgement in associating with Simon Sheppard. Simon Sheppard on the other hand, is a man I have spoken with at length. I also bought his bizarre and pointless cd (Musigeny), and his book, Tyranny of Ambiguity.
I found Sheppard to be a disturbed individual and conversation with him was uncomfortable. I discovered just why my neck hairs stood on end in his presence when I read his book from cover to cover. Sheppard tries to pass his book off as a work of science. It is nothing of the sort. Sheppard uses his book to brag about his sexual antics with children in the Netherlands. Thankfully his predatory approaches are generally rejected by his would be victims. The man is a paedophile who is so creepy that he scares the children in question - Thank heaven!
It is a real shame that Nationalists have supported the 'Heretical Two'. Comparing Auschwitz to Butlins is the sort of lunacy which the Zionist elite love, as it makes those who repeat it appear mentally retarded. It has the damaging effect of linking real serious revisionist research with stupidity. If the likes of Sheppard and Whittle think this is the way to expose the Holyhoax propaganda, they are very very wrong. Those who titter with delight at such antics are laughing at the foolish works which the Establishment use to justify repression.
The conviction of Whittle and Sheppard gives the establishment ammunition to use against genuine upholders of free speech and truth seeking. Whilst I find the conviction of anyone for thought crimes abhorrent, I cannot be anything but pleased that the sick pervert Sheppard is off the streets. He is finally somewhere where he cannot injure any more children. He is in a place where nonces are not well liked, and where he may well receive some real justice for his pederasty.
When one looks at the treatment of Simon Sheppard and Eddy Morrison, one cannot but wonder at the mentality of the rank and file of the Nationalist movement. On the one hand we have a man who has fought against his daemons and has helped to educate generations of people to the evils of the Zionist cabal who form a significant part of the leadership of the internationalist network. On the other we have a paedophile who is so proud of his perversion he has written a book on it. Likewise, Eddy Morrison was responsible for the White Nationalist Party which built a non-Sectarian movement in the North of Ireland in which Catholics and Protestants marched shoulder to shoulder against the common foe. The only 'achievement' of Sheppard was to help tighten up the repressive laws against free thought and speech, and to get himself and his hapless dupe, Whittle, locked up.
Unbelievably, Morrison is portrayed as an enemy of the nation, and Sheppard is treated as a shining example of how we should all behave. It is no wonder that those from outside the Nationalist community who are our natural allies in the struggle against internationalism, refuse to have anything to do with the Nationalist movement. The attitude of the foot soldiers which the leadership have carefully crafted is repugnant to anyone with any sense.
If we are to have any hope of saving our people, our culture and our lands, then we must accept that the petty divisions, the emphasis on party above all else, and the resulting back-biting and hostility, have caused an immeasurable amount of ill to our nation. The Party System has pitted activist against activist in a fratricidal war, whilst the real enemy has gained victory upon victory at our expense. It has created an image of Nationalist as 'thickos' who enjoy violence for the sake of it, and are politically illiterate. It has reinforced the left-right division which has ensured that genuine opponents of internationalism are kept from uniting to halt the progress of the real enemy.
Scum like Sheppard should be thrown to hungry dogs to be torn apart for their crimes against children. they most certainly should not be revered for their ability to get themselves (and others) locked up! I disagree with Eddy on the issue of Parties, but I respect him for his genuine love of his country and his determination to do something to halt its demise. Nationalists need to stop being sheeple, and start thinking for themselves. They need to stop following orders and fight the true enemy - internationalism. This means ditching parties, and reaching out to everyone in our society, regardless of politics. If we can do this we will beat the Zionist machine. If we continue to fight amongst ourselves, and let the Zionist mafia advance unhindered, then we deserve to lose our lands. The choice is stark. Think or die.
Tuesday, 1 December 2009
In England there is a law prohibiting 'Causing an Animal Un-necessary Suffering'. This is a good thing. People who are cruel to animals and cause them pain should be punished. This should apply to everyone. However, people who inflict pain on animals to appease their gods, are allowed to go about their sadistic pleasures unhindered. This is wholly unacceptable.Hindus profess a love of animals, yet every five years Hindus in India ritually sacrifice 250,000 cows to appease their goddess. This practice will soon be replicated in Europe as the number of Hindus here continues to rise. Thanks to the Zionist revolution in the 1960s, many people believe the rosy image of Hindus created during the Hippy era. Far from being the cuddly spiritual people enshrined in the haze of drugs foisted on the world by those who lapped up the 'freedoms' given to the West by the anti-European Zionist mafia, Hindus follow a faith which celebrates cruelty to animals, and is quite happy to butcher people on a massive scale. One would be forgiven for believing that in the Indian Partition War of 1948 the Hindus sat around smoking cannabis whilst the Muslims slaughtered them and stole the land which is now know as the nations of Pakistan and Bangladesh. The Zionist-orchestrated wars in Central Asia and the Middle East of course reinforce this myth. Hindus were just as bloodthirsty as Muslims in the Partition War, and their religion just as barbaric.
Monday, 30 November 2009
Power to the Swiss people and the Schweizerische Volkspartei (SVP). The image caption reads, "Swiss quality, the middle class' party".
Swiss Ban Building of Minarets on Mosques - NYTimes.com: The government must now draft a supporting law on the ban, a process that could take at least a year and could put Switzerland in breach of international conventions on human rights.
Apparently even the mildest, most indirect attempts to resist genocidal levels of immigration can put Whites in breach of "international conventions on human rights".Of 150 mosques or prayer rooms in Switzerland, only 4 have minarets, and only 2 more minarets are planned. None conduct the call to prayer. There are about 400,000 Muslims in a population of some 7.5 million people. Close to 90 percent of Muslims in Switzerland are from Kosovo and Turkey, and most do not adhere to the codes of dress and conduct associated with conservative Muslim countries like Saudi Arabia, said Manon Schick, a spokeswoman for Amnesty International in Switzerland.
Nothing to see here. Only 5 percent of Switzerland's population is muslim, close to 100 percent of them cultural and genetic aliens.“Most painful for us is not the minaret ban, but the symbol sent by this vote,” said Farhad Afshar, who runs the Coordination of Islamic Organizations in Switzerland. “Muslims do not feel accepted as a religious community.”
The kosovars, turks, and other muslims can go home, feel accepted, and build as many minarets as they like. Most painful for the Swiss is that if "international human rights" prevail it's only a matter of time before the Swiss will be entirely dispossessed of their one and only homeland.
To the consternation of anti-White internationalists resistance is beginning to come not just from the "nativist", "xenophobic", "racist", "nazi" SVP - but also from leftist feminists.
Women lead Swiss in vote to ban minarets - Times Online: A right-wing campaign to outlaw minarets on mosques in a referendum being held in Switzerland today has received an unlikely boost from radical feminists arguing that the tower-like structures are “male power symbols” and reminders of Islam’s oppression of women.
This resistance is "right-wing" with "an unlikely boost" only if seen from an anti-White internationalist cheerleading point of view. Media bias isn't "liberal", it's anti-White.
A “stop the minarets” campaign has provoked ferment in the land of Heidi, where women are more likely than men to vote for the ban after warnings from prominent feminists that Islam threatens their rights.Socialist politicians have been furious to see icons of the left joining what is regarded as an anti-immigrant campaign by the populist Swiss People’s party, the biggest group in parliament.
Normal, healthy people don't like being replaced by aliens who look, think, and act alien, obliterating their precious homeland and traditions before their very eyes, forever. Apparently, neither do radical feminists.
One of them, Julia Onken, warned that failure to ban minarets would be “a signal of the state’s acceptance of the oppression of women”. She has sent out 4,000 emails attacking Muslims who condone forced marriage, honour killings and beating women.Swiss business is horrified. There are fears of a reaction against Swiss products similar to the one suffered by Denmark over the publication of cartoons depicting the prophet Muhammad in 2005.
“The brand ‘Swiss’ must continue to represent values such as openness, pluralism and freedom of religion,” said Hanspeter Rentsch, a member of the board of Swatch, the watchmaker.
It's more horrorifying that Swiss businessmen feel free to favor "brand 'Swiss'" over people Swiss. The irony is that openness and pluralism will eventually destroy the Swiss and all their "brands", and the freedom to build minarets will ultimately be very, very bad for business.
Can you guess who else thinks openness, pluralism and freedom of religion are more important than Swiss self-determination?
Push to ban minarets in Switzerland a 'threat':Switzerland's biggest Jewish groups said Wednesday that a far-right push to ban the construction of minarets here was a "threat" to religious harmony and hindered the integration of Muslims.
- The referendum infringes religious freedom, a concept enshrined in the constitution - said the Swiss Federation of Jewish Communities and the Platform of Liberal Jews in Switzerland in a statement.
It - also poses a threat to peaceful relations between the religions and inhibits the integration endeavours of Muslims in Switzerland - they added.
This is pure double-talk. Immigration brings the threat to harmony. The Swiss citizenry, who to the extent they've been informed and consulted have expressed their disfavor for immigration, muslim or otherwise, and should not be forced to suffer it, whether the immigrants wish to "integrate" with them or not. It is their very existence which is being infringed. What gives "jewish communities", who have not integrated after more than two millenia among Europeans, any standing to lecture anyone about immigration or integration? They consider themselves jews first, not Swiss, so they can STFU or move to israel and lecture their own tribe about immigration and integration.The two Jewish groups said they - take seriously the fears of the population that extremist ideas could be disseminated in Switzerland. -
If creating a sense of alienation is the concern then surely the alienation the native Swiss feel at the sight of minarets in their homeland trumps the senses of migrant muslims and jews, who after all are only guests. What the Swiss and all other Whites should take seriously is how jews and muslims do not hesitate to "discriminate", i.e. identify with and advocate in favor of their own groups, even as they pathologize Whites for any attempt to do so.
- But banning minarets is no solution -- it only creates in Muslims in Switzerland a sense of alienation and discrimination - they said.
It's true that banning minarets is no solution. Deporting aliens would be better, but even that wouldn't solve the problem. The problem is "international human rights". What horrifies Swiss business is the precedent for internationalist punishment that has already been set by organized jewry. See The Jewish Declaration of War on Nazi Germany: The Economic Boycott of 1933.
Why would any normal, healthy people want to see the dysfunctional middle east recreated inside their country's borders? In part because we're constantly told, as we're reminded here in this case, that it harms peaceful relations, harmony, and integration to see it this way. And in part because if we set that concern aside and persist then we're threatened - all the double-talk about peaceful relations, harmony, and integration aside - with open war.
Some pundits characterize what's happening to every White country, and only White countries, as "suicide", or "self-destruction" caused by "liberalism". This story of resistance from Switzerland, among others, puts the lie to that poisonous, blame-shifting meme.
UPDATE 2 Dec 2009: In a comment on Interview: Arthur Kemp, Hunter Wallace writes:Banning minarets is treating symptoms, not the disease.
I disagree.
The disease is the idea, which produced its most fateful results during the Enlightenment in the service of emancipating jews, that Whites, and only Whites, must not "discriminate" against "minorities". Since this meme took root it has been fed and twisted to genocidal proportions. Whites everywhere now live under a regime which subsidizes, supports, and even directly imposes "discrimination" against Whites, defending the interests of interloping aliens over the interests of the native-born citizenry.
The banning of minarets by popular vote strikes only obliquely at this idea, but it is a blow against the disease itself. Organized jewry roundly condemns it for exactly this reason. "Liberal" feminists played a prominent part in the minaret ban, putting the lie to the corollary meme, pimped constantly by faux-White pro-jews and others, that "suicidal" White "liberalism" is to blame for all that ills us. Even "liberals", it turns out, resist when their "suicide" becomes too blatant. The genocide is inflicted in the name of "liberal" "non-discrimination" in name but not in fact, and it is inflicted by "the international community" - which means the plutocrats, their media, their jet-setting cosmopolitan courtiers, jewish groups, muslim groups, and the treaonous costume clowns who serve their interests in their governments.
"Treating symptoms" is more fairly applied to much of what conservatives do here in the US - for example, to their focus on the transfer of wealth via taxes or healthcare, never identifying who the wealth is transferred from or to; or to the "culture war", never identifying who's at war with whom.
England is a mess - not only England, but the entire European World. The decline of our world hasn't happened over night, but it certainly has accelerated in recent years. Apologists for the modern malaise will argue that those of us who object to our demise are 'dinosaurs' who yearn for a golden age which never existed. They are wrong. We object, not out of some misplaced romanticism, but out of an understanding of the bigger picture. We understand that the death of our way of life is not a natural and inevitable event, but is rather a carefully calculated assault on us which aims to remove all obstacles to the complete global slave state which our mis-rulers have been constructing for hundreds of years and are now near to realising. We now live in a ludicrous situation where the Welfare System provides a comfortable existence for people who know how to manipulate the system. The State have very kindly provided an army of 'do-gooders' to help people to scrounge their way to a life of leisure. By taxing workers beyond any measure of what is reasonable, and paying the rent and council tax of the unemployed (in addition to a fortnightly handout for beer etc), it has now become pointless to take minimum wage jobs as one can 'earn' as much sitting on one's backside as one can by working for the basic rate and then paying all one's own bills. People who own their own houses do not have their mortgages paid so must take slave wages or face eviction - and in the latter case, they will be housed at the expense of the tax-payer! This removes any incentive to own property - but of course that is the idea of the Communitarian, aka Communist, Establishment who spout the mantra "Property is Theft" (at least, Property for others). Madness.
The legal system has been equally distorted. Bleeding hearty liberals employed as Probation workers, Prison Governors etc have made prisons so lax that they no longer are a deterrent. The prisons are now so overcrowded that Courts are ordered by the State to only remand people in exceptional circumstances. Instead, criminals are tagged electronically and given curfews - thus allowing them to continue their criminal activities hindered only by having to be at home for set periods (usually night-time). They may also have to give urine samples for drug analysis once a week, and undertake a couple of hours unpaid work per week. It really does prove how lax the Prison system is that criminals will offend over and over whilst on a non-custodial Court Order in order to be incarcerated for a couple of weeks to quash the Probation requirements! They WANT to go to prison! But why wouldn't they? In prison they have access to more heroin, crack etc than they could dream of outside, and due to 'human rights' campaigners they do not have to do any work at all, and must be provided with leisure and educational facilities. For many people, Prison accommodation is preferable to that which they have in the real world, and it is a great place to network with other criminals.
